16 found
Sort by:
  1. William Berkson (2000). Book Review:The Holistic Inspirations of Physics: The Underground History of Electromagnetic Theory Val Dusek. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 67 (3):536-.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. William Berkson (1994). Some Practical Issues in the Recent Controversy on the Nature of Scientific Revolutions. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14:197-210.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. William Berkson (1990). In Defense of Good Reasons. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):84-91.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. William Berkson (1990). Methodology is Pragmatic: A Response to Miller. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 20 (1):95-98.
  5. William Berkson (1989). Testability in the Social Sciences. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 19 (2):157-171.
  6. William Berkson & John Wettersten (1989). Learning From Error, Karl Popper's Psychology of Learning. Synthese 78 (3):357-358.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. William Berkson (1987). Research Problems and the Understanding of Science. In Nancy J. Nersessian (ed.), The Process of Science: Contemporary Philosophical Approaches to Understanding Scientific Practice. Distributors for the United States and Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. William Berkson (1987). Skeptical Rationalism. In Joseph Agassi & I. C. Jarvie (eds.), Inquiry. Distributors for the U.S. And Canada, Kluwer Academic Publishers 21--43.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. William Berkson (1979). Skeptical Rationalism. Inquiry 22 (1-4):281 – 320.
    To improve our methods of rational inquiry and decision-making we need to recognize that such methods should guide but not fully determine the choices of individuals. Failure to acknowledge the essential incompleteness of rational methods made the methods of Classical Rationalism quite impractical and opened them to skeptical refutation. Mitigated Skepticism and Fideism failed to correct the error, and as a result put undesirable limits on rational inquiry. When the guiding character of rational methods is recognized, existing methods of scientific (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. William Berkson (1978). Reply to L. Pearce Williams. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (3):243-248.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. William Berkson (1978). The Formal and the Informal. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1978:297 - 308.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. William Berkson (1976). Lakatos One and Lakatos Two: An Appreciation. In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Reidel 39--54.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. William Berkson (1975). Fields of Force: The Development of a World View From Faraday to Einstein. Philosophical Review 84 (4):595-598.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. William Berkson (1975). "The Structure of Scientific Inference" by Mary Hesse. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 5 (3):361.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. William Berkson (1974). Fields of Force. New York,Wiley.
    This book tells how a series of very remarkable men tried to get a better understanding of the world. These men are Michael Faraday and those he influenced: ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. William Berkson (1972). Critical Review: Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Proceedings of the International Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science, London 1965, Vol. 4. Journal of Critical Analysis 4 (3):112-116.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation