Search results for 'William O.’Neill' (try it on Scholar)

684 found
Sort by:
  1. Sadhbh O' Neill, Louis Caruana, Gayle Kenny & Garin V. Dowd (1997). Books Briefly Noted. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):341 – 346.score: 150.0
    This Sacred Earth: Religion, Nature, Environment Edited by Roger S. Gottlieb Routledge, 1996. Pp. 673. ISBN 0-415-91233-4. 45.00 (hbk) 16.99 (pbk) Moderate Realism and its Logic By D.W. Mertz Yale University Press, 1996. Pp. xvi + 310. ISBN 0-300-06561-2. 27.50 (hbk) William James Remembered Edited by Linda Simon University of Nebraska Press, 1996. Pp. 275. ISBN 0-8032-4248-4. 28.50 (hbk). Cybermonde: La politique du pire. Entretien avec Philippe Petit. By Paul Virilio Les ditions Textuel, 1996.pp. 110. ISBN 2-909317-21-8. FF 79 (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Curtis Clements, John D. Neill & O. Scott Stovall (2009). An Analysis of International Accounting Codes of Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (1):173 - 183.score: 120.0
    The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) has recently issued a revised "Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants" (IFAC Code). As a requirement for membership in IFAC, a national accounting organization must either adopt the IFAC Code or adopt a code of conduct that is not "less stringent" than the IFAC Code. In this paper, we examine the extent to which 158 national accounting organizations have adopted the revised IFAC Code as their own. Our results indicate that 80 of our sample (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Curtis Clements, John D. Neill & O. Scott Stovall (2009). The Impact of Cultural Differences on the Convergence of International Accounting Codes of Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 90 (3):383 - 391.score: 120.0
    The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) has issued a revised “Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants” (IFAC Code). The IFAC Code is intended to be a model code of ethics for national accounting organizations throughout the world. Prior research demonstrates that approximately 50% of IFAC member organizations have adopted the IFAC Code as their organizational code of conduct. There is therefore empirical evidence that international convergence of accounting ethical standards is occurring. We employ Hofstede’s ( 2008 , http://www.geert-hofstede.com/hofstede_dimensions.php ) cultural (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. David Lamb, Sadhbh O' Neill, Alan P. F. Sell, Patrick Gorevan, Feargal Murphy & Brendan Purcell (1997). Book Briefly Noted. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1):138 – 146.score: 120.0
    Introducing Applied Ethics Edited by Brenda Almond, Blackwell, 1995. Pp. 375. ISBN 0-631-19389-8. 45.00 (hbk), 14.99 (pbk). Environmental Ethics Edited by Robert Elliot, Oxford University Press, 1995. Pp. 255. ISBN 9-19-875144-3. 9.95 (pbk) Medicine and Moral Reasoning Edited by K.W.M. Fulford, Grant Gillett and Janet Martin Soskice Cambridge University Press, 1994. Pp. 207. ISBN 0-521-45325-9 37.50 (hbk), 12.95 (pbk). Enlightenment and Religion. Rational Dissent in Eighteenth-century Britain Edited by Knud Haakonssen, Cambridge University Press, 1996. Pp. xii + 348. ISBN 0-521-56060-8. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John D. Neill, O. Scott Stovall & Darryl L. Jinkerson (2005). A Critical Analysis of the Accounting Industry's Voluntary Code of Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1-2):101 - 108.score: 120.0
    The public accounting industry’s voluntary code of conduct in the United States is the American Institute of CPA’s Code of Professional Conduct. Based on our analysis, we conclude that the accounting industry’s current code is limited in its ability to serve the public interest in three respects. Specifically, the code is input-based, requires no third-party attestation of compliance with the code, and contains no public reporting process of code compliance/noncompliance at the accounting firm level. We propose that the accounting profession (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. W. Michael Hoffman, John D. Neill & O. Scott Stovall (2008). An Investigation of Ethics Officer Independence. Journal of Business Ethics 78 (1-2):87 - 95.score: 120.0
    In this paper, we examine whether ethics officers are able to perform their assigned duties independently of organizational management. Specifically, we investigate whether inherent conflicts of interest with company management potentially hinder the ability of ethics officers to serve as an effective monitor and deterrent of unethical activity throughout the organization. As part of our analysis, we conducted 10 detailed phone interviews with current and retired ethics officers in order to determine whether practicing ethics officers feel the need for additional (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. William H. D. Neill (1966). Some Attacks on Causality Prior to Hume. Vivarium 4 (1):58-65.score: 120.0
  8. O. Scott Stovall, John D. Neill & David Perkins (2004). Corporate Governance, Internal Decision Making, and the Invisible Hand. Journal of Business Ethics 51 (2):221-227.score: 120.0
    Proponents of the dominant contemporary model of corporate governance maintain that the shareholder is the primary constituent of the firm. The responsibility for managerial decision makers in this governance system is to maximize shareholder wealth. Neoclassical economists ethically justify this objective with their interpretation of Adam Smith's notion of the Invisible Hand. Using a famous quotation from The Wealth of Nations, they interpret the Invisible Hand as Smith's (An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, Methuen (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Patrick A. O'Connor & W. Trammell Neill (2011). Does Subliminal Priming of Free Response Choices Depend on Task Set or Automatic Response Activation? Consciousness and Cognition 20 (2):280-287.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. William Mc Neill (1988). Book Reviews. [REVIEW] British Journal of Aesthetics 28 (3).score: 120.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Onora O. Neill (1992). 9 Vindicating Reason. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant. Cambridge University Press. 3--280.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. O. Scott Stovall, John D. Neill & Brad Reid (2006). Institutional Impediments to Voluntary Ethics Measurement Systems. Journal of Business Ethics 66 (2/3):169 - 175.score: 120.0
    In this paper, we argue that calls for widespread implementation of ethics measurement systems would be better informed by institutional economic analysis. Specifically, we assert that proponents of such systems must first recognize and understand the institutions that potentially impede such efforts. We identify two potential institutional impediments to measuring ethics and social responsibility. First, we suggest that neoclassical economics, supported by traditional business education and legal precedent, serves to reinforce the notion that shareholders are the primary corporate constituency group. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. John D. Neill, O. Scott Stovall & Darryl L. Jinkerson (2005). A Critical Analysis of the Accounting Industry's Voluntary Code of Conduct. Journal of Business Ethics 59 (1-2):101-108.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. H. J. Blumenthal (1970). Proclus' Commentary on Alcibiades I William O'Neill: Proclus, Alcibiades I. A Translation and Commentary. Pp. Ix+247. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1965. Cloth, Fl. 23.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 20 (01):32-34.score: 90.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Vincent C. Punzo (1975). "With Charity Toward None: An Analysis of Ayn Rand's Philosophy," by William F. O'Neill. The Modern Schoolman 52 (3):333-333.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Roland J. Teske (1975). "With Charity Toward None: An Analysis of Ayn Rand's Philosophy," by William F. O'Neill. Modern Schoolman 52 (3):333-333.score: 87.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Thomas M. Besch (2008). Constructing Practical Reason: O'Neill on the Grounds of Kantian Constructivism. Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (1):55-76.score: 84.0
    The paper addresses O'Neill's view that her version of Kant's Categorical Imperative, namely, the requirement of followability (RF), marks the supreme principle of reason; it takes issue with her claim that RF commits us to Kantian constructivism in practical philosophy. The paper distinguishes between two readings of RF: on a weak reading, RF ranges over all (practical) reasoning but does not commit to constructivism, and on a strong version RF commits to constructivism but fails to meet its own test, and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Onora O'Neill (1998). Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature: Onora O'Neill. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):211–228.score: 70.0
    [Allen W. Wood] Kant's moral philosophy is grounded on the dignity of humanity as its sole fundamental value, and involves the claim that human beings are to be regarded as the ultimate end of nature. It might be thought that a theory of this kind would be incapable of grounding any conception of our relation to other living things or to the natural world which would value nonhuman creatures or respect humanity's natural environment. This paper criticizes Kant's argumentative strategy for (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. John O'Neill (1998). Against Reductionist Explanations of Human Behaviour: John O'Neill. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):173–188.score: 70.0
    [John Dupré] This paper attacks some prominent contemporary attempts to provide reductive accounts of ever wider areas of human behaviour. In particular, I shall address the claims of sociobiology (or evolutionary psychology) to provide a universal account of human nature, and attempts to subsume ever wider domains of behaviour within the scope of economics. I shall also consider some recent suggestions as to how these approaches might be integrated. Having rejected the imperialistic ambitions of these approaches, I shall briefly advocate (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. William R. O'Neill (1994). The Ethics of Our Climate: Hermeneutics and Ethical Theory. Georgetown University Press.score: 59.0
    In this book, William O'Neill, S.J., offers an interpretation of the nature and scope of practical reasoning in light of postmodern philosophical criticism.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Wendy Donner (1999). The Sources of Normativity Christine M. Korsgaard, with G. A. Cohen, Raymond Geuss, Thomas Nagel, and Bernard Williams Onora O'Neill, Editor Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996, Xv + 273 Pp. [REVIEW] Dialogue 38 (03):653-.score: 57.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Thomas M. Besch (2011). Kantian Constructivism, the Issue of Scope, and Perfectionism: O'Neill on Ethical Standing. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):1-20.score: 56.0
    Kantian constructivists accord a constitutive, justificatory role to the issue of scope: they typically claim that first-order practical thought depends for its authority on being suitably acceptable within the right scope, or by all relevant others, and some Kantian constructivists, notably Onora O'Neill, hold that our views of the nature and criteria of practical reasoning also depend for their authority on being suitably acceptable within the right scope. The paper considers whether O'Neill-type Kantian constructivism can coherently accord this key role (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Kimberley Brownlee (2009). Normative Principles and Practical Ethics: A Response to O'Neill. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):231-237.score: 56.0
    abstract This article briefly examines Onora O'Neill's account of the relation between normative principles and practical ethical problems with an eye to suggesting that philosophers of practical ethics have reason to adopt fairly high moral ambitions to be edifying and instructive both as educators and as advisors on public policy debates.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Alexander Brown (forthcoming). What Should Egalitarians Believe If They Really Are Egalitarian? A Reply to Martin O'Neill. European Journal of Political Theory:1474885113506710.score: 56.0
    In his article, ‘What Should Egalitarians Believe?’, Martin O’Neill argues, amongst other things, that egalitarians should reject both Telic and Deontic Egalitarianism and that they should adopt in their place a version of Non-Intrinsic Egalitarianism, specifically, the Pluralist Non-Intrinsic Egalitarian View. The central purpose of my article is to challenge O’Neill’s assumption that he can defend each of the various propositions that make up his position simultaneously. I do this with two arguments. First, I argue that in order to justify (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Ilkka Niiniluoto (1991). Goldstick and O'Neill on "Truer Than". Philosophy of Science 58 (3):491-495.score: 56.0
    In a recent article, Goldstick and O'Neill propose a definition for the comparative "truer than" relation between rival propositions. This definition is studied here in a context where the concept of "convexity" is well defined for propositions. It turns out that the Goldstick-O'Neill definition gives a reasonable but very restricted sufficient condition for the "truer than" relation, but fails as a necessary condition.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Alasdair Maclntyre (1983). Iv. Moral Rationality, Tradition, and Aristotle: A Reply to Onora O'Neill, Raimond Gaita, and Stephen R. L. Clark. Inquiry 26 (4):447 – 466.score: 56.0
    O'Neill's critique of my account of Kant does point to serious inadequacies in that treatment, but I argue in reply that on some central points she is mistaken and that Kant's moral rigorism and his conception of what it is to be a rational agent are more open to the conventional objections than she allows. What needs to be put in question is the whole nature of rational justification in morality, for justification always in fact requires the context of a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. G. M. Stirrat (2005). Autonomy in Medical Ethics After O'Neill. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):127-130.score: 56.0
    Next SectionFollowing the influential Gifford and Reith lectures by Onora O’Neill, this paper explores further the paradigm of individual autonomy which has been so dominant in bioethics until recently and concurs that it is an aberrant application and that conceptions of individual autonomy cannot provide a sufficient and convincing starting point for ethics within medical practice. We suggest that revision of the operational definition of patient autonomy is required for the twenty first century. We follow O’Neill in recommending a principled (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Brian Baxter (1999). Environmental Ethics – Values or Obligations? A Reply to O'Neill. Environmental Values 8 (1):107 - 112.score: 56.0
    Onora O'Neill recently argued that environmental ethics could and should be reformulated in terms of a search for the obligations held by moral agents towards each other, with respect to the non-human world. The more popular alternative, which seeks to establish the intrinsic value of the non-human, is plagued with various theoretical difficulties attaching to the concept of value. It is here argued that O'Neill's attempt to determine fundamental obligations of moral agents on the basis of a non-universalisability criterion does (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. David Archard, Monique Deveaux, Neil Manson & Daniel Weinstock (eds.) (2013). Reading Onora O'neill. Routledge.score: 56.0
    Onora O’Neill is one of the foremost moral philosophers writing today. Her work on ethics and bioethics, political philosophy and the philosophy of Kant is extremely influential. Her landmark Reith Lectures on trust did much to establish the subject not only on the philosophical and political agenda but in the world of media, business and law more widely. Reading Onora O’Neill is the first book to examine and critically appraise the work of this important thinker. It includes specially commissioned chapters (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Michael O'Neill (1987). Confession as Artifice in the Plays of Eugene O'Neill. Renascence 39 (3):430-441.score: 56.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. O. O'Neill (1997). Herlinde Pauer-Studer on Tugend Und Gerechtigkeit: Eine Konstruktive Darstellung des Praktischen Denkens by Onora O'Neill (Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning). European Journal of Philosophy 5:331-333.score: 56.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. William H. Hughes (1999). Time Hayward and John O'Neill (Eds.), Justice, Property and the Environment: Social and Legal Perspectives. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):249-252.score: 45.0
  33. Eric Watkins & William Fitzpatrick (2002). O'Neill and Korsgaard on the Construction of Normativity. Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2-3):349-367.score: 45.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. O. Höffe (1993). Onora O'Neill: Constructions of Reason. Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1989, 249 S. [REVIEW] Philosophische Rundschau 40 (1-2):83-86.score: 45.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Lawrence O. Gostin (2008). O'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law Scholarship. Hastings Center Report 10:11.score: 45.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Sarah Williams Holtman (1998). Comments on O'Neill: Instituting Principles: Between Duty and Action. Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (S1):97-102.score: 43.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Sarah Williams Holtman (1997). Comments on O'Neill. Southern Journal of Philosophy 36 (Supplement):97-102.score: 43.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Thomas M. Besch (2004). On Practical Constructivism and Reasonableness. Dissertation, University of Oxfordscore: 42.0
    The dissertation defends that the often-assumed link between constructivism and universalism builds on non-constructivist, perfectionist grounds. To this end, I argue that an exemplary form of universalist constructivism – i.e., O’Neill’s Kantian constructivism – can defend its universalist commitments against an influential particularist form of constructivism – i.e., political liberalism as advanced by Rawls, Macedo, and Larmore – only if it invokes a perfectionist view of the good. (En route, I show why political liberalism is a form of particularism and (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Adam Etinson (2013). Human Rights, Claimability and the Uses of Abstraction. Utilitas 25 (4):463-486.score: 42.0
    This article addresses the so-called to human rights. Focusing specifically on the work of Onora O'Neill, the article challenges two important aspects of her version of this objection. First: its narrowness. O'Neill understands the claimability of a right to depend on the identification of its duty-bearers. But there is good reason to think that the claimability of a right depends on more than just that, which makes abstract (and not welfare) rights the most natural target of her objection (section II). (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. David Archard (2009). Applying Philosophy: A Response to O'Neill. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):238-244.score: 42.0
    abstract I consider the putative originality of applied philosophy and seek to defend a version of it often called 'bottom up'. I review ways in which imagined cases may cause us to reconsider our normative commitments, and endorse a general attentiveness to the matter of how the world is and how it might reasonably be imagined. This is important if practical philosophers want to form the correct normative judgements, to be able to recognize the sui generis character of some moral (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Lisa Parker (2008). Review of Neil C. Manson and Onora O'Neill, Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):68-69.score: 42.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Stephen Engstrom (1992). Review: O'Neill, Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. [REVIEW] Ethics 102 (3):653-.score: 42.0
  43. Sean Sayers (2001). Review of Onora O'Neill, Bounds of Justice. [REVIEW] First Review.score: 42.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Yvette E. Pearson (2008). Onora O'Neill, Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), Pp. XI + 213. Utilitas 20 (2):248-250.score: 42.0
  45. Thomas M. Besch (2013). On a Reflexive Case for Human Rights. Journal of East-West Thought 3 (4):51-64.score: 42.0
    Can there be a "reflexive" or presuppositional, reasonably non-rejectable grounding of a Forst-type right to justification, or of a meaningful form of constitutive discursive standing? The paper argues that this is not so, and this for reasons that reflect more general limitations of presuppositional arguments for relevantly contested conclusions. To this end, the paper critically engages Forst's "reflexive" argument for human rights. It also considers O'Neill's presuppositional attempt to defend a form of cosmopolitanism, as well as the attempt to anchor (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Reviewed by Andrews Reath (2000). Onora O'Neill, Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning. Ethics 110 (4).score: 42.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Geoffrey Gorham (2005). Review of Christia Mercer (Ed.), Eileen O'Neill (Ed.), Early Modern Philosophy: Mind, Matter, and Metaphysics. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (9).score: 42.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Carolyn McLeod (2003). A Review of Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics, by Onora O'Neill. American Journal of Medical Genetics 121 (1):85-87.score: 42.0
1 — 50 / 684