Search results for 'William O.’Neill' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  13
    H. J. Blumenthal (1970). Proclus' Commentary on Alcibiades I William O'Neill: Proclus, Alcibiades I. A Translation and Commentary. Pp. Ix+247. The Hague: Nijhoff, 1965. Cloth, Fl. 23.50. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 20 (01):32-34.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  4
    Sadhbh O' Neill, Louis Caruana, Gayle Kenny & Garin V. Dowd (1997). Books Briefly Noted. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (2):341 – 346.
    This Sacred Earth: Religion, Nature, Environment Edited by Roger S. Gottlieb Routledge, 1996. Pp. 673. ISBN 0-415-91233-4. 45.00 (hbk) 16.99 (pbk) Moderate Realism and its Logic By D.W. Mertz Yale University Press, 1996. Pp. xvi + 310. ISBN 0-300-06561-2. 27.50 (hbk) William James Remembered Edited by Linda Simon University of Nebraska Press, 1996. Pp. 275. ISBN 0-8032-4248-4. 28.50 (hbk). Cybermonde: La politique du pire. Entretien avec Philippe Petit. By Paul Virilio Les ditions Textuel, 1996.pp. 110. ISBN 2-909317-21-8. FF 79 (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  9
    Vincent C. Punzo (1975). "With Charity Toward None: An Analysis of Ayn Rand's Philosophy," by William F. O'Neill. Modern Schoolman 52 (3):333-333.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  3
    Roland J. Teske (1975). "With Charity Toward None: An Analysis of Ayn Rand's Philosophy," by William F. O'Neill. Modern Schoolman 52 (3):333-333.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Thomas M. Besch (2008). Constructing Practical Reason: O'Neill on the Grounds of Kantian Constructivism. Journal of Value Inquiry 42 (1):55-76.
    The paper addresses O'Neill's view that her version of Kant's Categorical Imperative, namely, the requirement of followability (RF), marks the supreme principle of reason; it takes issue with her claim that RF commits us to Kantian constructivism in practical philosophy. The paper distinguishes between two readings of RF: on a weak reading, RF ranges over all (practical) reasoning but does not commit to constructivism, and on a strong version RF commits to constructivism but fails to meet its own test, and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  15
    Eric Watkins & William Fitzpatrick (2002). O'Neill and Korsgaard on the Construction of Normativity. Journal of Value Inquiry 36 (2-3):349-367.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  7.  4
    William H. Hughes (1999). Time Hayward and John O'Neill (Eds.), Justice, Property and the Environment: Social and Legal Perspectives. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):249-252.
  8. Onora O'Neill (1998). Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature: Onora O'Neill. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):211–228.
    [Allen W. Wood] Kant's moral philosophy is grounded on the dignity of humanity as its sole fundamental value, and involves the claim that human beings are to be regarded as the ultimate end of nature. It might be thought that a theory of this kind would be incapable of grounding any conception of our relation to other living things or to the natural world which would value nonhuman creatures or respect humanity's natural environment. This paper criticizes Kant's argumentative strategy for (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  29
    Onora O'Neill (1998). Kant on Duties Regarding Nonrational Nature: Onora O'Neill. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):211-228.
    [Allen W. Wood] Kant's moral philosophy is grounded on the dignity of humanity as its sole fundamental value, and involves the claim that human beings are to be regarded as the ultimate end of nature. It might be thought that a theory of this kind would be incapable of grounding any conception of our relation to other living things or to the natural world which would value nonhuman creatures or respect humanity's natural environment. This paper criticizes Kant's argumentative strategy for (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  17
    John O'Neill (1998). Against Reductionist Explanations of Human Behaviour: John O'Neill. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):173–188.
    [John Dupré] This paper attacks some prominent contemporary attempts to provide reductive accounts of ever wider areas of human behaviour. In particular, I shall address the claims of sociobiology (or evolutionary psychology) to provide a universal account of human nature, and attempts to subsume ever wider domains of behaviour within the scope of economics. I shall also consider some recent suggestions as to how these approaches might be integrated. Having rejected the imperialistic ambitions of these approaches, I shall briefly advocate (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  6
    John O'Neill (1998). Against Reductionist Explanations of Human Behaviour: John O'Neill. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 72 (1):173-188.
    [John Dupré] This paper attacks some prominent contemporary attempts to provide reductive accounts of ever wider areas of human behaviour. In particular, I shall address the claims of sociobiology (or evolutionary psychology) to provide a universal account of human nature, and attempts to subsume ever wider domains of behaviour within the scope of economics. I shall also consider some recent suggestions as to how these approaches might be integrated. Having rejected the imperialistic ambitions of these approaches, I shall briefly advocate (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. James A. Robinson (1982). Eugene O'neill and Oriental Thought a Divided Vision.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  14
    Gianluca Verrucci (2010). Ragion pratica e normatività. Il costruttivismo kantiano di Rawls, Korsgaard e O'Neill. Mimesis.
  14.  11
    William R. O'Neill (1994). The Ethics of Our Climate: Hermeneutics and Ethical Theory. Georgetown University Press.
    In this book, William O'Neill, S.J., offers an interpretation of the nature and scope of practical reasoning in light of postmodern philosophical criticism.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  57
    G. M. Stirrat (2005). Autonomy in Medical Ethics After O'Neill. Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):127-130.
    Next SectionFollowing the influential Gifford and Reith lectures by Onora O’Neill, this paper explores further the paradigm of individual autonomy which has been so dominant in bioethics until recently and concurs that it is an aberrant application and that conceptions of individual autonomy cannot provide a sufficient and convincing starting point for ethics within medical practice. We suggest that revision of the operational definition of patient autonomy is required for the twenty first century. We follow O’Neill in recommending a principled (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  16. Alexander Brown (2014). What Should Egalitarians Believe If They Really Are Egalitarian? A Reply to Martin O'Neill. European Journal of Political Theory 13 (4):453-469.
    In his article, ‘What Should Egalitarians Believe?’, Martin O’Neill argues, amongst other things, that egalitarians should reject both Telic and Deontic Egalitarianism and that they should adopt in their place a version of Non-Intrinsic Egalitarianism, specifically, the Pluralist Non-Intrinsic Egalitarian View. The central purpose of my article is to challenge O’Neill’s assumption that he can defend each of the various propositions that make up his position simultaneously. I do this with two arguments. First, I argue that in order to justify (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Ilkka Niiniluoto (1991). Goldstick and O'Neill on "Truer Than". Philosophy of Science 58 (3):491-495.
    In a recent article, Goldstick and O'Neill propose a definition for the comparative "truer than" relation between rival propositions. This definition is studied here in a context where the concept of "convexity" is well defined for propositions. It turns out that the Goldstick-O'Neill definition gives a reasonable but very restricted sufficient condition for the "truer than" relation, but fails as a necessary condition.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18. Thomas M. Besch (2011). Kantian Constructivism, the Issue of Scope, and Perfectionism: O'Neill on Ethical Standing. European Journal of Philosophy 19 (1):1-20.
    Kantian constructivists accord a constitutive, justificatory role to the issue of scope: they typically claim that first-order practical thought depends for its authority on being suitably acceptable within the right scope, or by all relevant others, and some Kantian constructivists, notably Onora O'Neill, hold that our views of the nature and criteria of practical reasoning also depend for their authority on being suitably acceptable within the right scope. The paper considers whether O'Neill-type Kantian constructivism can coherently accord this key role (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Kimberley Brownlee (2009). Normative Principles and Practical Ethics: A Response to O'Neill. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):231-237.
    abstract This article briefly examines Onora O'Neill's account of the relation between normative principles and practical ethical problems with an eye to suggesting that philosophers of practical ethics have reason to adopt fairly high moral ambitions to be edifying and instructive both as educators and as advisors on public policy debates.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. John O'neill (1993). Future Generations: Present Harms: John O'Neill. Philosophy 68 (263):35-51.
    There is a special problem with respect to our obligations to future generations which is that we can benefit or harm them but that they cannot benefit or harm us. Goodin summarizes the point well: No analysis of intergenerational justice that is cast even vaguely in terms of reciprocity can hope to succeed. The reason is the one which Addison… puts into the mouth of an Old Fellow of College, who when he was pressed by the Society to come into (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  21.  10
    Kerstin Budde (2009). Constructivism All the Way Down – Can O’Neill Succeed Where Rawls Failed? Contemporary Political Theory 8 (2):199-223.
    While universalist theories have come under increasing attack from relativist and post-modern critics, such as Walzer, MacIntyre and Rorty, Kantian constructivism can be seen as a saviour of universalist ethics. Kantian constructivists accept the criticism that past universalist theories were foundational and philosophically comprehensive and thus contestable, but dispute that universalist principles are unattainable. The question then arises if Kantian constructivism can deliver a non-foundational justification of universal principles. Rawls, the first Kantian constructivist, has seemingly retreated from the universalist ambitions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  8
    Brian Baxter (1999). Environmental Ethics – Values or Obligations? A Reply to O'Neill. Environmental Values 8 (1):107 - 112.
    Onora O'Neill recently argued that environmental ethics could and should be reformulated in terms of a search for the obligations held by moral agents towards each other, with respect to the non-human world. The more popular alternative, which seeks to establish the intrinsic value of the non-human, is plagued with various theoretical difficulties attaching to the concept of value. It is here argued that O'Neill's attempt to determine fundamental obligations of moral agents on the basis of a non-universalisability criterion does (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  5
    Ilsup Ahn (2014). Feminist Justice and the Case of Undocumented Migrant Women and Children: A Critical Dialog with Benhabib, Nussbaum, Young, and O'Neill. Journal of Global Ethics 10 (2):199-215.
    In recent years, scholars and researchers have discovered a new trend in the migration of unauthorized people into the United States: while the total numbers of unaccompanied migrant children crossing the border have grown exponentially in the past few years, human rights violations against migrant women have also increased significantly. This unfortunate trend is not unrelated to the intensifying border militarization and the criminalization of all unauthorized migrants. This paper attempts to provide an ethical solution to the political conundrum of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  9
    Alasdair Maclntyre (1983). Iv. Moral Rationality, Tradition, and Aristotle: A Reply to Onora O'Neill, Raimond Gaita, and Stephen R. L. Clark. Inquiry 26 (4):447 – 466.
    O'Neill's critique of my account of Kant does point to serious inadequacies in that treatment, but I argue in reply that on some central points she is mistaken and that Kant's moral rigorism and his conception of what it is to be a rational agent are more open to the conventional objections than she allows. What needs to be put in question is the whole nature of rational justification in morality, for justification always in fact requires the context of a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  1
    Michael O'Neill (1987). Confession as Artifice in the Plays of Eugene O'Neill. Renascence 39 (3):430-441.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. David Archard, Monique Deveaux, Neil Manson & Daniel Weinstock (eds.) (2013). Reading Onora o’Neill. Routledge.
    Onora O’Neill is one of the foremost moral philosophers writing today. Her work on ethics and bioethics, political philosophy and the philosophy of Kant is extremely influential. Her landmark Reith Lectures on trust did much to establish the subject not only on the philosophical and political agenda but in the world of media, business and law more widely. Reading Onora O’Neill is the first book to examine and critically appraise the work of this important thinker. It includes specially (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. David Archard, Monique Deveaux, Neil Manson & Daniel Weinstock (eds.) (2013). Reading Onora o’Neill. Routledge.
    Onora O’Neill is one of the foremost moral philosophers writing today. Her work on ethics and bioethics, political philosophy and the philosophy of Kant is extremely influential. Her landmark Reith Lectures on trust did much to establish the subject not only on the philosophical and political agenda but in the world of media, business and law more widely. Reading Onora O’Neill is the first book to examine and critically appraise the work of this important thinker. It includes specially commissioned chapters (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. O. O'Neill (1997). Herlinde Pauer-Studer on Tugend Und Gerechtigkeit: Eine Konstruktive Darstellung des Praktischen Denkens by Onora O'Neill (Towards Justice and Virtue: A Constructive Account of Practical Reasoning). European Journal of Philosophy 5:331-333.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  11
    Kerstin Budde (2009). Constructivism All the Way Down |[Ndash]| Can O|[Rsquo]|Neill Succeed Where Rawls Failed|[Quest]|. Contemporary Political Theory 8 (2):199.
    While universalist theories have come under increasing attack from relativist and post-modern critics, such as Walzer, MacIntyre and Rorty, Kantian constructivism can be seen as a saviour of universalist ethics. Kantian constructivists accept the criticism that past universalist theories were foundational and philosophically comprehensive and thus contestable, but dispute that universalist principles are unattainable. The question then arises if Kantian constructivism can deliver a non-foundational justification of universal principles. Rawls, the first Kantian constructivist, has seemingly retreated from the universalist ambitions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  17
    Lawrence O. Gostin (2008). O'Neill Institute for National & Global Health Law Scholarship. Hastings Center Report 10:11.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. O. Höffe (1993). Onora O'Neill: Constructions of Reason. Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1989, 249 S. [REVIEW] Philosophische Rundschau 40 (1-2):83-86.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  4
    William Stephens, By William O. Stephens.
    More than 2,200 years have passed since a group of sober people gathered in a covered colonnade, or stoa, in the marketplace of Athens to discuss the good life – a life of virtue and honor. They became known as Stoics, and their ancient creed is enjoying a renaissance today in, of all things, popular culture.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Rudolf Schüßler (1994). Comment on John O'Neill. Analyse & Kritik 16 (2):217-219.
    The comment focusses on O,Neills advocacy of Classical Institutionalism and the problems of the ideal-regarding approach to the construction of institutions. It maintains that CI shows no signs of progress which would justify a renewed exclusive interest in this paradigm and that the ideal-regarding approach needs some consequentialist balancing to avoid obvious risks of totalitarian denaturation.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  1
    Tanya Baytor & Oscar Cabrera (2014). Using Experiential Learning to Develop Interprofessional Skills in Global Health: Perspectives From the O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 42 (s2):65-68.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  47
    Patrick Riley (2003). Review Essay Of O’Neill And Flikschuh. Political Theory 31 (2):315-318.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  20
    Andrew Fiala (2014). Marcus Aurelius. A Guide for the Perplexed, by William O. Stephens. Ancient Philosophy 34 (2):458-462.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  36
    David Archard (2009). Applying Philosophy: A Response to O'Neill. Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (3):238-244.
    abstract I consider the putative originality of applied philosophy and seek to defend a version of it often called 'bottom up'. I review ways in which imagined cases may cause us to reconsider our normative commitments, and endorse a general attentiveness to the matter of how the world is and how it might reasonably be imagined. This is important if practical philosophers want to form the correct normative judgements, to be able to recognize the sui generis character of some moral (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  10
    Louis F. Doyle (1964). The Myth of Eugene O'Neill. Renascence 17 (2):59-62.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  1
    Paul Laverdure (2015). Michel O’Neill, L’épopée des Petits frères de la Croix. Histoire d’une nouvelle communauté monastique québécoise dans l’Église catholique d’aujourd’hui. Préface de Raymond Lemieux. Québec, Presses de l’Université Laval, 2014, xxii-232 p.Michel O’Neill, L’épopée des Petits frères de la Croix. Histoire d’une nouvelle communauté monastique québécoise dans l’Église catholique d’aujourd’hui. Préface de Raymond Lemieux. Québec, Presses de l’Université Laval, 2014, xxii-232 p. [REVIEW] Laval Théologique et Philosophique 71 (2):339-341.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  4
    Carla Bagnoli (2015). Review: David Archard, Monique Deveaux, Neil Manson, and Daniel Weinstock, Eds., Reading Onora O’Neill. [REVIEW] Ethics 125 (4):1184-1189.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  7
    Joshua Alexander (2014). "Experimental Philosophy and its Critic," Ed. Joachim Horvath and Thomas Grundmann; "Experimental Philosophy," Volume 2, Ed. Joshua Knobe and Shaun Nichols; and "Current Controversies in Experimental Philosophy," Ed. Edouard Machery and Elizabeth O’Neill. [REVIEW] Teaching Philosophy 37 (3):411-414.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  4
    Carla Bagnoli (2015). Archard, David; Deveaux, Monique; Manson, Neil; and Weinstock, Daniel, Eds.Reading Onora O’Neill.New York: Routledge, 2013. Pp. 250. $44.95. [REVIEW] Ethics 125 (4):1184-1189.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  14
    Terrie A. Becerra (2010). Karen M. O'Neill: Rivers by Design: State Power and the Origins of U.S. Flood Control. [REVIEW] Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):303-307.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  6
    Kate Soper (2007). Markets, Deliberation and Environment. By John O'Neill. Journal of Critical Realism 6 (2):318-323.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  35
    Stephen Engstrom (1992). Review: O'Neill, Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant's Practical Philosophy. [REVIEW] Ethics 102 (3):653-.
  46.  11
    Kenneth Einar Himma (2002). Onora O'Neill, Bounds of Justice. Philosophical Inquiry 24 (1-2):111-113.
  47. Thomas Pogge (1992). O'Neill on Rights and Duties. Grazer Philosophische Studien 43:233-47.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48. Sean Sayers (2001). Review of Onora O'Neill, Bounds of Justice. [REVIEW] First Review.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  33
    Lisa Parker (2008). Review of Neil C. Manson and Onora O'Neill, Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics. [REVIEW] American Journal of Bioethics 8 (8):68-69.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  3
    Review by: Carla Bagnoli (2015). Review: David Archard, Monique Deveaux, Neil Manson, and Daniel Weinstock, Eds., Reading Onora O’Neill. [REVIEW] Ethics 125 (4):1184-1189,.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000