37 found
Sort by:
  1. Winfried Nöth (forthcoming). Are Signs the Instruments? Semiotics:683-694.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Winfried Nöth (2014). The Semiotics of Learning New Words. Journal of Philosophy of Education 48 (3):446-456.
    In several of his papers, Charles S. Peirce illustrates processes of interpreting and understanding signs by examples from second language vocabulary teaching and learning. The insights conveyed by means of these little pedagogical scenarios are not meant as contributions to the psychology of second language learning, but they aim at elucidating fundamental semiotic implications of knowledge acquisition in general. Peirce's semiotic premise that a well-understood sign is one that represents an object and creates an interpretant is essential to the understanding (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Winfried Nöth (2012). Перевод и семиотическое посредничество. Резюме. Sign Systems Studies 40 (3-4):298-298.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Winfried Nöth (2012). Translation and Semiotic Mediation. Sign Systems Studies 40 (3-4):279-298.
    Translation, according to Charles S. Peirce, is semiotic mediation. In sign processes in general, the sign mediates between the object, which it represents, and its interpretant, the idea it evokes, the interpretation it creates, or the action it causes. To what extent does the way a translator mediates correspond to what a sign does in semiosis? The paper inquires into the parallels between the agency of the sign in semiosis and the agency of the interpreter (and translator) in translation. It (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Winfried Nöth (2012). Tõlkimine ja semiootiline vahendamine. Kokkuvõte. Sign Systems Studies 40 (3-4):298-298.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Winfried Nöth (2011). From Representation to Thirdness and Representamen to Medium: Evolution of Peircean Key Terms and Topics. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 47 (4):445-481.
    The nature of representation has been a central but controversial issue of cognitive philosophy. After 2,500 years of reflection (cf. Rolf 2006), opinions are still divided. On the one hand, there are those who are convinced that we have reached a crisis of representation in the arts, the media, and cultural theory; on the other hand, representation has remained right at the top of the agenda of cognitive science and Artificial Intelligence research (cf. Nöth & Ljungberg, eds. 2003; Nöth 1997). (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Winfried Nöth (2011). Self-Referential Postmodernity. Semiotica 2011 (183):199-217.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Winfried Nöth (2010). The Criterion of Habit in Peirce's Definitions of the Symbol. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 46 (1):82-93.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Winfried Nöth (2008). Mediale Selbstreferenz: Grundlagen Und Fallstudien Zu Werbung, Computerspiel Und den Comics. Von Halem.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Winfried Nöth (2008). Sign Machines in the Framework of Semiotics Unbounded. Semiotica 2008 (169):319-341.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Winfried Nöth (2007). Narrative Self-Reference in a Literary Comic: M.-A. Mathieu's L'Origine. Semiotica 2007 (165):173-190.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Winfried Noth (2006). Representations of Imaginary, Nonexistent, or Nonfigurative Objects. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofía 7:277-291.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Winfried Nöth (2006). Representações de Objetos Imaginários, Não-existentes ou Não-figurativos. Cognitio: Revista de Filosofia. Issn (Impresso) 1518-7187;(Eletrônico) 2316-5278 7 (2):277-291.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Winfried Nöth (2006). Yuri Lotman on Metaphors and Culture as Self-Referential Semiospheres. Semiotica 2006 (161):249-263.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Winfried Nöth (2004). Semiotics of Ideology. Semiotica 2004 (148).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Winfried Nöth (2003). Семиотические основания к изучению изображений. Резюме. Sign Systems Studies 31 (2):392-392.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Winfried Nöth (2003). Crisis of Representation? Semiotica 2003 (143):9-15.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Winfried Nöth (2003). Kujutiste uurimise semiootilised alused. Kokkuvõte. Sign Systems Studies 31 (2):392-392.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Winfried Nöth (2003). Semiotic Foundations of the Study of Pictures. Sign Systems Studies 31 (2):377-391.
    Are pictures signs? That pictures are signs is evident in the case of pictures that “represent”, but is not “representation” a synonym of “sign”, and if so, can non-representational paintings be considered signs? Some semioticians have declared that such pictures cannot be signs because they have no referent, and in phenomenology the opinion prevails that they are not signs because they are phenomena sui generis. The present approach follows C. S. Peirce’s semiotics: representational and non-representational pictures and even mental pictures (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Winfried Nöth & Christina Ljungberg (2003). Introduction. Semiotica 2003 (143).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Winfried Nöth (2001). Ecosemiotics and the Semiotics of Nature. Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):71-81.
    Ecosemiotics is the study of sign processes (semioses) in relation to the natural environment in which they occur. The paper examines the cultural, biological, and evolutionary dimensions of ecosemioses on the basis of C. S. Peirce's theory of continuity between matter and mind and investigates the ecosemiotic dimensions of natural signs. Ecosemiotics and the semiotics of nature are distinguished from pansemiotism, and the coevolution of sign processes with their natural enviromnent is discussed as a determining factor of ecosemiosis.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Winfried Nöth (2001). German Italian Colloquium" The Semiotic Threshold From Nature to Culture, Kassell, Germany, 16±17 February at the Center for Cultural Studies, University of Kassel; Papers Published Together with the Imatra 2000 Ecosemiotics Colloquium in The Semiotics of Nature, a Special Issue Of. [REVIEW] Sign Systems Studies 100 (29.1).
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Winfried Nöth (2001). Ökosemiootika ja looduse semiootika Kokkuvõte. Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):81-81.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Winfried Nöth (2001). Protosemiotics and Physicosemiosis. Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):13-25.
    Protosemiotics is the study of the rudiments of semiosis, primarily in nature. The extension of the semiotic field from culture to nature is both necessary and possible in the framework of Peirce's semiotic theory. Against this extension, the critique of pansemiotism has been raised. However, Peirce's semiotics is not pansemiotic since it is based on the criterion of thirdness, which is not ubiquitous in nature. The paper examines the criteria of protosemiosis in the domain of physical and mechanical processes.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Winfried Nöth (2001). Protosemiootika ja füsikosemioosis. Kokkuvõte. Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):26-26.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Winfried Nöth (2001). Semiosis and the Umwelt of a Robot. Semiotica 2001 (134).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Winfried Nöth & Kalevi Kull (2001). Introduction. Sign Systems Studies 29 (1):9-11.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Robert P. Puła, Vincent M. Colapietro & Winfried Noth (2001). Robert P. puła. Studia Semiotyczne 23:193.
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Winfried Nöth (2000). Umberto Eco. Sign Systems Studies 28:61-61.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Winfried Nöth (2000). Umberto Eco "semiootiline lävi". Kokkuvõte. Sign Systems Studies 28:61-61.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Winfried Nöth (2000). Umberto Eco's Semiotic Threshold. Sign Systems Studies 28:49-60.
    The "semiotic threshold" is U. Eco's metaphor of the borderline between the world of semiosis and the nonsemiotic world and hence also between semiotics and its neighboring disciplines. The paper examines Eco's threshold in comparison to the views of semiosis and semiotics of C. S. Peirce. While Eco follows the structuralist tradition, postulating the conventionality of signs as the main criterion of semiosis, Peirce has a much broader concept of semiosis, which is not restricted to phenomena of culture but includes (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Winfried Nöth & Kalevi Küll (2000). Discovering Ecoserniotics. Sign Systems Studies 28:421-424.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Winfried Nöth (1999). Peircean Semiotics in the Study of Iconicity in Language. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 35 (3):613 - 619.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Winfried Nöth (1998). 1. Ecology and Ecosemiotics. Sign Systems Studies 26:332-343.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Winfried Nöth (1997). Representation in Semiotics and in Computer Science. Semiotica 115 (3-4):203-214.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Winfried Nöth (1977). Semiotics of the Old English Charm. Semiotica 19 (1-2).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Winfried Nöth (1975). Homeostasis and Equilibrium in Linguistics and Text Analysis. Semiotica 14 (3).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation