Search results for 'Yitzhak' (try it on Scholar)

140 found
Order:
  1.  59
    Yitzhak Melamed (2013). Symposium on Yitzhak Y. Melamed, Spinoza’s Metaphysics,. Leibniz Review 23:207-222.
  2.  22
    Don Garrett (2014). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought by Yitzhak Y. Melamed. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophy 111 (11):641-647.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  16
    Sheldon Richmond (2013). The View From Within: Normativity and the Limits of Self-Criticism by Menachem Fisch and Yitzhak Benbaji. Tradition and Discovery 40 (3):50-52.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  24
    Martin Lin (2013). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought by Yitzhak Y. Melamed. The Leibniz Review 23:195-205.
  5.  2
    Alison Peterman (2016). The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making Ed. By Yitzhak Y. Melamed. Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (1):169-170.
    What passes as Spinozism in most circles can be found in the first two parts of the Ethics, and even Spinoza scholars can be guilty of making only opportunistic use of weirder works such as the Short Treatise and Cogitata Metaphysica. The goal of The Young Spinoza, Melamed explains in the introduction, is to stimulate research on Spinoza’s early works, both because of what serious consideration of those works can tell us about the Ethics and because they contain plenty of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  5
    Isabel Moreira (2006). Yitzhak Hen and Rob Meens, Eds., The Bobbio Missal: Liturgy and Religious Culture in Merovingian Gaul. (Cambridge Studies in Palaeography and Codicology, 11.) Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. Xii, 232; 2 Black-and-White Figures, 8 Black-and-White Plates, 1 Table, and 1 Map. $90. [REVIEW] Speculum 81 (3):860-861.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  8
    Colin Marshall (2013). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought, by Yitzhak Melamed. The Leibniz Review 23:187-194.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  15
    Michael LeBuffe (2012). Reply to Yitzhak Melamed. The Leibniz Review 21:161-164.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  15
    Henry Southgate (2013). Spinoza and German Idealism Ed. By Eckart Förster, Yitzhak Y. Melamed (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 51 (3):495-496.
    It turns out that you can teach an old dog—even a “dead dog,” as Lessing would describe Spinoza—new tricks. In Spinoza and German Idealism, we learn not only how Spinoza influenced the German Idealists, but also how they transformed and gave new life to the key concepts of his system. In this collection of fourteen essays, we see how Kant, Schleiermacher, Herder, Goethe, Fichte, Schelling, Hegel, and Trendelenburg understood (and misunderstood) Spinoza’s conception of God, intellectual intuition, human freedom, and the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  3
    Alberto Ferreiro (2009). Yitzhak Hen, Roman Barbarians: The Royal Court and Culture in the Early Medieval West.(Medieval Culture and Society.) Basingstoke, Eng., and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007. Pp. Xiii, 213; 6 Maps. $69.95 (Cloth); $26.95 (Paper). [REVIEW] Speculum 84 (2):447-449.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  6
    Alfred I. Tauber (2012). Menachem Fisch and Yitzhak Benbaji , The View From Within: Normativity and the Limits of Self-Criticism . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 32 (4):266-269.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  1
    Michael LeBuffe (2011). Reply to Yitzhak Melamed. Leibniz Society Review 21:161-164.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  1
    Martin Lin (2013). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought by Yitzhak Y. Melamed. Leibniz Society Review 23:195-205.
  14.  1
    Colin Marshall (2013). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought, by Yitzhak Melamed. Leibniz Society Review 23:187-194.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  3
    Mayke de Jong (1999). Yitzhak Hen, Culture and Religion in Merovingian Gaul, AD 481–751.(Cultures, Beliefs and Traditions: Medieval and Early Modern Peoples, 1.) Leiden, New York, and Cologne: EJ Brill, 1995. Pp. Xiv, 308; Tables. $80. [REVIEW] Speculum 74 (2):428-429.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  1
    Thomas F. X. Noble (2002). Yitzhak Hen and Matthew Innes, Eds., The Uses of the Past in the Early Middle Ages. Cambridge, Eng.: Cambridge University Press, 2000. Pp. Ix, 283. $64.95 (Cloth); $23.95 (Paper). [REVIEW] Speculum 77 (4):1307-1309.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Bartholomew Begley (2015). The Young Spinoza: A Metaphysician in the Making, Edited by Yitzhak Y. Melamed, New York, Oxford University Press, 2015, 387 Pp., £64 , ISBN 978-0-19-997165-7 / £20 , ISBN 978-0-19-997166-4. [REVIEW] International Journal of Philosophy and Theology 76 (2):168-170.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. IsaiahHG Berlin (2014). Yitzhak Sadeh. In Personal Impressions: Third Edition. Princeton University Press 252-268.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Erik Bormanis (2013). Spinoza and German Idealism Förster Eckart, and Melamed Yitzhak Y., Eds. Cambridge University Press, 2012; VII+ 285 Pp.; $100.95 (Hardback). [REVIEW] Dialogue 52 (2):403-404.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. M. A. Heller (1998). The Rabin Memoirs. By Yitzhak Rabin, with Afterword by Yoram Peri. The European Legacy 3:109-109.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Christopher Martin (2014). Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance and Thought by Yitzhak Y. Melamed. Journal of the History of Philosophy 52 (2):377-378.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Thomas F. X. Noble (2003). Yitzhak Hen, The Royal Patronage of Liturgy in Frankish Gaul to the Death of Charles the Bald . Woodbridge, Eng., and Rochester, N.Y.: Boydell and Brewer, for the Henry Bradshaw Society, 2001. Pp. Xii, 180. $60. [REVIEW] Speculum 78 (2):514-515.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23. H. J. Rindisbacher (2001). Reinventing Russia: Russian Nationalism and the Soviet State, 1953-1991. By Yitzhak M. Brudny. The European Legacy 6 (3):419-420.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. A. D. Smith (2015). Spinoza's Metaphysics: Substance and Thought, by Yitzhak Y. Melamed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013, Xxii + 232 Pp. ISBN 978-0-19-539405-4 Hb $74.00. [REVIEW] European Journal of Philosophy 23:e6-e8.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  47
    Uwe Steinhoff (2010). Benbaji on Killing in War and 'the War Convention'. Philosophical Quarterly 60 (240):616-623.
    Yitzhak Benbaji defends the view that soldiers on both the ‘just’ and the ‘unjust’ side in a war have the same liberty right to kill one another, because soldiers have ‘tacitly accepted’ the egalitarian laws of war and thereby waived their moral rights not to be attacked. I argue that soldiers on the ‘just’ side have not accepted the egalitarian laws of war; even if they had, they would not thereby have waived their moral rights not to be attacked. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  16
    Yitzhak Melamed (forthcoming). Eternity in Early Modern Philosophy. In Yitzhak Y. Melamed (ed.), Eternity: A History. Oxford Unuversity Press 129-167.
    Modernity seemed to be the autumn of eternity. The secularization of European culture provided little sustenance to the concept of eternity with its heavy theological baggage. Yet, our hero would not leave the stage without an outstanding performance of its power and temptation. Indeed, in the first three centuries of the modern period – the subject of the third chapter by Yitzhak Melamed - the concept of eternity will play a crucial role in the great philosophical systems of the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2013). Spinoza's Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford University Press Usa.
    Yitzhak Melamed here offers a new and systematic interpretation of the core of Spinoza's metaphysics. In the first part of the book, he proposes a new reading of the metaphysics of substance in Spinoza: he argues that for Spinoza modes both inhere in and are predicated of God. Using extensive textual evidence, he shows that Spinoza considered modes to be God's propria. He goes on to clarify Spinoza's understanding of infinity, mereological relations, infinite modes, and the flow of finite (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  28.  22
    Eckart Förster & Yitzhak Y. Melamed (eds.) (2012). Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: 1. Rationality, idealism, monism, and beyond Michael Della Rocca; 2. Kant's idea of the unconditioned and Spinoza's the fourth antinomy and the ideal of pure reason Omri Boehm; 3. The question is whether a purely apparent person is possible Karl Ameriks; 4. Herder and Spinoza Michael Forster; 5. Goethe's Spinozism Eckart Förster; 6. Fichte on freedom: the Spinozistic background Allen Wood; 7. Fichte on the consciousness of Spinoza's God Johannes Haag; 8. Spinoza in Schelling's early conception (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2007). Radical Protestantism in Spinoza's Thought. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 45 (2):333-334.
    Yitzhak Y. Melamed - Radical Protestantism in Spinoza's Thought - Journal of the History of Philosophy 45:2 Journal of the History of Philosophy 45.2 333-334 Muse Search Journals This Journal Contents Reviewed by Yitzhak Y. Melamed University of Chicago Graeme Hunter. Radical Protestantism in Spinoza's Thought. Aldershot, UK–Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2005. Pp. vii + 196. Cloth, $89.95. If this book's announced and modest aim—"to present the Christian dimension of Spinoza's thought positively and directly" —were all the author meant (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  38
    Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Michael A. Rosenthal (eds.) (2010). Spinoza's 'Theological-Political Treatise': A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
    Machine generated contents note: List of contributors; Acknowledgements; List of abbreviations; Introduction Yitzhak Y. Melamed and Michael Rosenthal; Spinoza's exchange with Albert Burgh Edwin Curley; The text of Spinoza's Tractatus Theologico-Politicus Piet Steenbakkers; Spinoza on Ibn Ezra's Secret of the Twelve Warren Zev Harvey; Reflections of the medieval Jewish-Christian debate in the Theological-Political Treatise and the Epistles Daniel J. Lasker; The early Dutch and German reaction to the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus: foreshadowing the Enlightenment's more general Spinoza reception? Jonathan (...); G. W. Leibniz's two readings of the Tractatus Theologico-Politicus Mogens Laerke; The metaphysics of the Theological-Political Treatise Yitzhak Y. Melamed; Spinoza's conception of law: metaphysics and ethics Donald Rutherford; Getting his hands dirty: Spinoza's criticism of the rebel Michael Della Rocca; 'Promising' ideas: Hobbes and contract in Spinoza's political philosophy Don Garrett; Spinoza's curious defense of toleration Justin Steinberg; Miracles, wonder, and the state in Spinoza's Theological-Political Treatise Michael A. Rosenthal; Narrative as the means to freedom: Spinoza on the uses of imagination Susan James; Bibliography. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2015). Spinoza's Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford University Press Usa.
    Yitzhak Melamed here offers a new and systematic interpretation of the core of Spinoza's metaphysics. In the first part of the book, he proposes a new reading of the metaphysics of substance in Spinoza: he argues that for Spinoza modes both inhere in and are predicated of God. Using extensive textual evidence, he shows that Spinoza considered modes to be God's propria. He goes on to clarify Spinoza's understanding of infinity, mereological relations, infinite modes, and the flow of finite (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2010). Acosmism or Weak Individuals?: Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite. Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (1):pp. 77-92.
    Like many of his contemporaries, Hegel considered Spinoza a modern reviver of ancient Eleatic monism, in whose system “all determinate content is swallowed up as radically null and void”. This characterization of Spinoza as denying the reality of the world of finite things had a lasting influence on the perception of Spinoza in the two centuries that followed. In this article, I take these claims of Hegel to task and evaluate their validity. Although Hegel’s official argument for the unreality of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  33.  78
    Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2009). Spinoza's Metaphysics of Substance: The Substance-Mode Relation as a Relation of Inherence and Predication. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (1):17-82.
  34.  15
    Yitzhak Y. Melamed (forthcoming). The Causes of Our Belief in Free Will: Spinoza on Necessary, ‘Innate,’ yet False Cognition. In Spinoza’s Ethics: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
    This chapter will discuss Spinoza’s critique of free will, though our brief study of this topic in the first part of the chapter will aim primarily at preparing us to address the main topic of the chapter, which is Spinoza’s explanation of the reasons which force us to believe in free will. At times, Spinoza seems to come very close to asserting the paradoxical claim that we are not free to avoid belief in free will. In the second part (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2013). Spinoza's Metaphysics of Thought: Parallelisms and the Multifaceted Structure of Ideas. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 86 (3):636-683.
    In this paper, I suggest an outline of a new interpretation of core issues in Spinoza’s metaphysics and philosophy of mind. I argue for three major theses. (1) In the first part of the paper I show that the celebrated Spinozistic doctrine commonly termed “the doctrine of parallelism” is in fact a confusion of two separate and independent doctrines of parallelism. Hence, I argue that our current understanding of Spinoza’s metaphysics and philosophy of mind is fundamentally flawed. (2) The clarification (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2012). “Omnis Determinatio Est Negatio” – Determination, Negation and Self-Negation in Spinoza, Kant, and Hegel. In Eckart Forster & Yitzhak Y. Melamed (eds.), Spinoza and German Idealism. Cambridge University Press
    Spinoza ’s letter of June 2, 1674 to his friend Jarig Jelles addresses several distinct and important issues in Spinoza ’s philosophy. It explains briefly the core of Spinoza ’s disagreement with Hobbes’ political theory, develops his innovative understanding of numbers, and elaborates on Spinoza ’s refusal to describe God as one or single. Then, toward the end of the letter, Spinoza writes: With regard to the statement that figure is a negation and not anything positive, it is obvious that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2010). Spinoza's Anti-Humanism. In Smith Justin & Fraenkel Carlos (eds.), The Rationalists. Springer/Synthese
    A common perception of Spinoza casts him as one of the precursors, perhaps even founders, of modern humanism and Enlightenment thought. Given that in the twentieth century, humanism was commonly associated with the ideology of secularism and the politics of liberal democracies, and that Spinoza has been taken as voicing a “message of secularity” and as having provided “the psychology and ethics of a democratic soul” and “the decisive impulse to… modern republicanism which takes it bearings by the dignity of (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  38. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2013). Spinoza's Metaphysics: Substance and Thought. Oxford University Press.
    This book is comprised of two parts. The first four chapters concentrate on the metaphysics of substance, while the last two address Spinoza’s metaphysics of thought. These two parts are closely connected, and several crucial claims in the last two chapters rely on arguments advanced in the first four. I intentionally use the term ‘metaphysics of thought’ rather than ‘philosophy of mind’ for two main reasons. First, the domain of thought in Spinoza is far more extensive than anything associated with (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2012). “’Christus Secundum Spiritum’: Spinoza, Jesus, and the Infinite Intellect”. In Neta Stahl (ed.), The Jewish Jesus. Routledge
  40. Jacob Blair (2011). Honor in the Military and the Possible Implication for the Traditional Separation of Jus Ad Bellum and Jus in Bello. In Applied Ethics Series (Center for Applied Ethics and Philosophy). 94-102.
    Traditional just war theory maintains that the two types of rules that govern justice in times of war, jus ad bellum (justice of war) and jus in bello (justice in war), are logically independent of one another. Call this the independence thesis. According to this thesis, a war that satisfies the ad bellum rules does not guarantee that the in bello rules will be satisfied; and a war that violates the ad bellum rules does not guarantee that the in bello (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Yitzhak Melamed (forthcoming). Spinoza's Amor Dei Intellectualis. In Noa Naaman (ed.), Descartes and Spinoza on the Passions. Cambridge University Press
    The notion of divine love was essential to medieval Christian conceptions of God. Jewish thinkers, though, had a much more ambivalent attitude about this issue. While Maimonides was reluctant to ascribe love, or any other affect, to God, Gersonides and Crescas celebrated God’s love. Though Spinoza is clearly sympathetic to Maimonides’ rejection of divine love as anthropomorphism, he attributes love to God nevertheless, unfolding his notion of amor Dei intellectualis at the conclusion of his Ethics. But is this a legitimate (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Yitzhak Melamed & Martin Lin, Principle of Sufficient Reason. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    The Principle of Sufficient Reason is a powerful and controversial philosophical principle stipulating that everything must have a reason or cause. This simple demand for thoroughgoing intelligibility yields some of the boldest and most challenging theses in the history of metaphysics and epistemology. In this entry we begin with explaining the Principle, and then turn to the history of the debates around it. A section on recent discussions of the Principle will be added in the near future.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  43. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2013). Charitable Interpretations and the Political Domestication of Spinoza, or, Benedict in the Land of the Secular Imagination. In Mogens Laerke Eric Schilsser (ed.), The Methodology of the History of Philosophy. Oxford University Press
    In a beautiful recent essay, the philosopher Walter Sinnott-Armstrong explains the reasons for his departure from evangelical Christianity, the religious culture in which he was brought up. Sinnot-Armstrong contrasts the interpretive methods used by good philosophers and fundamentalist believers: Good philosophers face objections and uncertainties. They follow where arguments lead, even when their conclusions are surprising and disturbing. Intellectual honesty is also required of scholars who interpret philosophical texts. If I had distorted Kant’s view to make him reach a conclusion (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2012). Spinoza's Deification of Existence. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6:75-104.
    The aim of this paper is to clarify Spinoza’s views on some of the most fundamental issues of his metaphysics: the nature of God’s attributes, the nature of existence and eternity, and the relation between essence and existence in God. While there is an extensive literature on each of these topics, it seems that the following question was hardly raised so far: What is, for Spinoza, the relation between God’s existence and the divine attributes? Given Spinoza’s claims that there are (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Yitzhak Y. Melamed (forthcoming). The Building Blocks of Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance, Attributes and Modes. In Michael Della Rocca (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Spinoza. Oxford University Press
  46.  90
    Yitzhak Melamed (2014). Hasdai Crescas and Spinoza on Actual Infinity and the Infinity of God’s Attributes. In Steven Nadler (ed.), Spinoza and Jewish Philosophy. Cambridge University Press 204-215.
    The seventeenth century was an important period in the conceptual development of the notion of the infinite. In 1643, Evangelista Torricelli (1608-1647)—Galileo’s successor in the chair of mathematics in Florence—communicated his proof of a solid of infinite length but finite volume. Many of the leading metaphysicians of the time, notably Spinoza and Leibniz, came out in defense of actual infinity, rejecting the Aristotelian ban on it, which had been almost universally accepted for two millennia. Though it would be another two (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  6
    Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2016). Divine Teaching and the Way of the World: A Defense of Revealed Religion. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 125 (1):151-154.
  48. Yitzhak Melamed (2012). The Sirens of Elea: Rationalism, Monism and Idealism in Spinoza. In Antonia Lolordo & Duncan Stewart (eds.), Debates in Early Modern Philosophy. Blackwell
    The main thesis of Michael Della Rocca’s outstanding Spinoza book (Della Rocca 2008a) is that at the very center of Spinoza’s philosophy stands the Principle of Sufficient Reason (PSR): the stipulation that everything must be explainable or, in other words, the rejection of any brute facts. Della Rocca rightly ascribes to Spinoza a strong version of the PSR. It is not only that the actual existence and features of all things must be explicable, but even the inexistence – as well (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  7
    Yitzhak Y. Melamed (forthcoming). Descartes' Method. In Larry Nolan (ed.), Cambridge Descartes Lexicon. Cambride University Press
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  20
    Yitzhak Y. Melamed (2012). Spinoza on Inherence, Causation, and Conception. Journal of the History of Philosophy 50 (3):365-386.
    Spinoza’s philosophy is bold and rich in challenges to our “common-sense intuitions”, and insofar as it provides powerful arguments to motivate these challenges, I believe that we cannot ask for more. Bold and well-argued philosophy has the indispensable virtue of being able to unsettle and try us, to move us to reconsider what seems natural and obvious, and possibly even to change our most basic beliefs. Indeed, for those who seek to test – rather than confirm - their old and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
1 — 50 / 140