Search results for 'Yon Pérez Laraudogoitia' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Yon Pérez Laraudogoitia (1985). Interpretación Modal de la Mecánica Cuántica. Theoria 1 (1):235-251.score: 870.0
    In this paper, we present a (propositionaI) modal-Iogic approximation to Quantum Mechanics from a reduced and characteristic number of “crucial experiments” and so independently of the lattice of subspaces of Hilbert space. Kripke’s semantics, which determinates this system, allows to define, from a new point of view, the notions of “measurement process” and “virtual world” and admits a natural interpretation which in turn can help us to understand the measurement problem. In this way, we can attempt a “many-worlds” interpretation of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (1999). Why Dynamical Self-Excitation is Possible. Synthese 119 (3):313-323.score: 520.0
    In Pérez Laraudogoitia (1996), I introduced a simple example of a supertask that involved the possibility of spontaneous self-excitation and, therefore, of a particularly interesting form of indeterminism in classical dynamics. Alper and Bridger (1998) criticised (among other things) this result. In the present article, I answer their criticisms. In what follows I assume familiarity both with Pérez Laraudogoitia (1996) and Alper and Bridger’s subsequent article.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2002). On the Dynamics of Alper and Bridger. Synthese 131 (2):157 - 171.score: 520.0
    Bridger and Alper (1999) maintain that the nonphysical featuresof the supertasks described by Pérez Laraudogoitia (1996) involving a system containing an infinite number of particles may be avoided by introducing, in a specific way, Hilbert space in classical dynamics. I argue that it is possible to interpret their proposal in two ways, neither of which is acceptable for the purpose for which it was introduced.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jon Perez Laraudogoitia (1990). This Article Should Not Be Rejected by Mind. Mind 99 (396):599-600.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jon Perez Laraudogoitia (1998). Some Relativistic and Higher Order Supertasks. Philosophy of Science 65 (3):502-517.score: 240.0
    The first aim of this paper is to introduce a new way of looking at supertasks in the light of special relativity which makes use of the elementary dynamics of relativistic point particles subjected to elastic binary collisions and constrained to move unidimensionally. In addition, this will enable us to draw new physical consequences from the possibility of supertasks whose ordinal type is higher than the usual ω or ω * considered so far in the literature. Thus, the paper shows (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2014). The Supertask Argument Against Countable Additivity. Philosophical Studies 168 (3):619-628.score: 240.0
    This paper proves that certain supertasks constitute counterexamples to countable additivity even in the frame of an objective (not subjective, à la de Finetti) conception of probability. The argument requires taking conditional probability as a primitive notion.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2010). Erik-Jon Gaizka, the Magician of Infinity. Analysis 70 (3):451 - 456.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2009). Physical Action Without Interaction. Erkenntnis 70 (3):365 - 377.score: 240.0
    In “Action without interaction” (2005) I showed that one might act on a physical system (there, a particle), without interacting with it, by the procedure of making it disappear. This paper presents further extensions and a critique of that result. These extensions show why physical actions without interaction are possible, while underscoring the philosophical fertility of a characteristic approach to the actual infinite inaugurated by Benardete.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia, Supertasks. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2006). Global Interaction in Classical Mechanics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 20 (2):173 – 183.score: 240.0
    In this paper, an example is presented for a dynamic system analysable in the framework of the mechanics of rigid bodies. Interest in the model lies in three fundamental features. First, it leads to a paradox in classical mechanics which does not seem to be explainable with the conceptual resources currently available. Second, it is possible to find a solution to it by extending in a natural way the idea of global interaction in the context of what is called interaction (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jon Perez Laraudogoitia (1998). Infinity Machines and Creation Ex Nihilo. Synthese 115 (2):259-265.score: 240.0
    In this paper a simple model in particle dynamics of a well-known supertask is constructed (the supertask was introduced by Max Black some years ago). As a consequence, a new and simple result about creation ex nihilo of particles can be proved compatible with classical dynamics. This result cannot be avoided by imposing boundary conditions at spatial infinity, and therefore is really new in the literature. It follows that there is no reason why even a world of rigid spheres should (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jon Perez Laraudogoitia (1996). A Beautiful Supertask. Mind 105 (417):81-83.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jon Perez Laraudogoitia (2010). A Flawed Argument Against Actual Infinity in Physics. Foundations of Physics 40 (12):1902-1910.score: 240.0
    In “Nonconservation of Energy and loss of Determinism II. Colliding with an Open Set” (2010) Atkinson and Johnson argue in favour of the idea that an actual infinity should be excluded from physics, at least in the sense that physical systems involving an actual infinity of component elements should not be admitted. In this paper I show that the argument Atkinson and Johnson use is erroneous and that an analysis of the situation considered by them is possible without requiring any (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2013). On Norton's Dome. Synthese 190 (14):2925-2941.score: 240.0
    Norton’s very simple case of indeterminism in classical mechanics has given rise to a literature critical of his result. I am interested here in posing a new objection different from the ones made to date. The first section of the paper expounds the essence of Norton’s model and my criticism of it. I then propose a specific modification in the absence of gravitational interaction. The final section takes into consideration a surprising consequence for classical mechanics from the new model introduced (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (1997). Classical Particle Dynamics, Indeterminism and a Supertask. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (1):49-54.score: 240.0
    In this paper a model in particle dynamics of a well-known supertask is constructed. As a consequence, a new and simple result about the failure of determinism of classical particle dynamics can be proved which is related to the non-existence of boundary conditions at spatial infinity. This result is much more accessible to the non-technical reader than similar ones in the scientific literature.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2004). On a (Supposedly) Plausible Extension of Newtonian Collision Dynamics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (2):365-370.score: 240.0
    In a recent volume of this journal, L. Angel ([2002]) proposed a collision mechanics leading to such strange results as the possibility that a particle may be in several places at the same time, or the existence of unprepared spatially-separated correlations. I will here show that neither of these results follows from his theory or, if it does, the theory, contrary to what Angel claims, is not a plausible extension of Newtonian collision dynamics. No bilocation No quantum leap No unprepared (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2013). Zeno and Flow of Information. Synthese 190 (3):439-447.score: 240.0
    Although the current literature on supertasks concentrates largely on their supposed physical implications (extending the tradition of Zeno’s classical paradoxes of movement), in this study I propose a new model of supertask that explores for the first time some of their information-related consequences and I defend these consequences from a possible criticism.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2000). CORNEA Against Theism. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (2):81 - 87.score: 240.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2000). Priest on the Paradox of the Gods. Analysis 60 (266):152–155.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2001). Indeterminism, Classical Gravitation and Non-Collision Singularities. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 15 (3):269 – 274.score: 240.0
    Until the present, the Newtonian theory of gravitation has only been studied in any detail through the usual, presupposed ontology of point particles. This paper shows that changing our ontology into one which makes use of continuous bodies (non-point particles) allows us to obtain in a simple way two important results relevant to the theory: (a) The Newtonian theory of gravitation is indeterministic in a way apparently unparalleled when non-point particle models of it are used. (b) In the Newtonian theory (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jon pérez Laraudogoitia (2003). A Variant of Benardete's Paradox. Analysis 63 (278):124–131.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2013). No Train Paradox. Philosophia 41 (1):217-220.score: 240.0
    In “The Train Paradox”(Philosophia (2006) 34: 437–438) Gwiazda proposes the use of the relativity of simultaneity to formulate a new paradox. My purpose here is to show that there is no Train Paradox in Gwiazda’s sense.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2013). Dispositions and the Trojan Fly. Noûs 48 (3).score: 240.0
    A detailed consideration of the Trojan fly supertask reveals certain unsuspected characteristics relating to determinism and causation. I propose here a solution to the new difficulty in terms of bare dispositions.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2003). Taking Self-Excitations Seriously: On Angel's Initial Condition. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):319-326.score: 240.0
    In a recent article, L. Angel ([2001]) argues that if we do not implement Newtonian physics adding to it a certain usual type of boundary condition, then this leads to the rejection of what he calls the P principle: ‘the composition of contact interactions does not create a noncontact interaction.’ Here I shall demonstrate that this conclusion does not follow. However, as will be made clear, this in no way diminishes the interest or importance of the model introduced by Angel (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2005). An Interesting Fallacy Concerning Dynamical Supertasks. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (2):321 - 334.score: 240.0
    Recently, Alper, Bridger, Earman and Norton have all proposed examples of dynamic systems that, in their view, are incompatible with classical (Newtonian) mechanics. In the first section of the present paper I shall show that their arguments are all undermined by the same fallacy. The second section proves that their conclusions of incompatibility are indeed false, and that what we are really looking at are new forms of indeterminist evolution of the same kind as that found recently in the literature (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2002). Just as Beautiful but Not (Necessarily) a Supertask. Mind 111 (442):281-288.score: 240.0
    In this paper I will put forward a simple case of a dynamical system which can exhibit both the indeterminism linked to escape to infinity and that linked to self-excitation. The case depends neither on the gravitational interaction between particles nor on their mutual collisions, and thus reveals the existence of a new kind of constraint that Newton's laws lay on the predictive power of classical dynamics.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2013). The New String Paradox. Philosophy of Science 80 (1):143-154.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Jon Perez Laraudogoitia (1990). A Doxastic Paradox. Analysis 50 (1):47 - 48.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Jon Perez Laraudogoitia (2005). Action Without Interaction. Analysis 65 (286):140-143.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2014). What the Tortoise Said to Achilles. Philosophia 42 (2):405-411.score: 240.0
    Continuing the conversation between Achilles and the tortoise begun by Carroll, this paper proves that, in a supertask context, there are free actions (in general, contingent states of affairs) that can be predicted by means of purely logical reasons.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (1999). Earman and Norton on Supertasks That Generate Indeterminism. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 50 (1):137 - 141.score: 240.0
    In a recent discussion, Earman and Norton [(1998)] propose a classification of supertasks that generate indeterminism which is flawed. An emendation is presented here.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (1996). New Difficulties with 'If... Then': The Paradox of the Businessman. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 11 (26):85-89.score: 240.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2006). A Look at the Staccato Run. Synthese 148 (2):433-441.score: 240.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Jon Pérez Laraudogoitia (2004). Essays on the History of Mechchanics: In Memory of Clifford Ambrose Truesdell and Edoardo Benvenuto. Theoria 19 (2):233-234.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jon Perez Laraudogoitia (1989). On Paradoxes in Naive Set Theory. Logique Et Analyse 32 (128):241-245.score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Yon Pérez Laraudogoitia (1985). Interpretación modal de la mecánica cuántica. Theoria 1 (1):235-251.score: 87.0
    In this paper, we present a (propositionaI) modal-Iogic approximation to Quantum Mechanics from a reduced and characteristic number of “crucial experiments” and so independently of the lattice of subspaces of Hilbert space. Kripke’s semantics, which determinates this system, allows to define, from a new point of view, the notions of “measurement process” and “virtual world” and admits a natural interpretation which in turn can help us to understand the measurement problem. In this way, we can attempt a “many-worlds” interpretation of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Gilberto Perez (1998). The Material Ghost: Films and Their Medium. Johns Hopkins University Press.score: 60.0
    "Tough, smart, superbly engaging, The Material Ghost is a terrific book." -- Edward W. Said In The Material Ghost , Gilberto Perez draws on his lifelong love of the movies as well as his work as a film scholar to write a lively, wide-ranging, penetrating study of films and filmmakers and the nature of the art form. For Perez, film is complex and richly contradictory, lifelike and dreamlike at once, a peculiar mix of reality and imagination. "The images on the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Mark Bridger & Joseph S. Alper (1999). On the Dynamics of Perez Lauraudogoitia's Supertask. Synthese 119 (3):325-337.score: 58.0
    The supertasks described by Perez Laraudogoitia, involving the dynamics of a system containing an infinite number of particles in a bounded region of space, are characterized by the nonconservation of energy and by the spontaneous motion of particles (“self-excitation”'). We argue that these features arise from the inadequacy of the local, particle-by-particle description used to analyze the supertasks. A global analysis, involving embeddings in Hilbert spaces, clarifies these supertasks and avoids what we regard as their nonphysical features.
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jon Pérez Laaraudogoitia, Mark Bridger & Joseph S. Alper (2002). Two Ways of Looking at a Newtonian Supertask. Synthese 131 (2):173 - 189.score: 34.0
    A supertask is a process in which an infinite number of individuated actions are performed in a finite time. A Newtonian supertask is one that obeys Newton''s laws of motion. Such supertasks can violate energy and momentum conservation and can exhibit indeterministic behavior. Perez Laraudogoitia, who proposed several Newtonian supertasks, uses a local, i.e., particle-by-particle, analysis to obtain these and other paradoxical properties of Newtonian supertasks. Alper and Bridger use a global analysis, embedding the system of particles in a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Diana I. Pérez (2008). Why Should Our Mind-Reading Abilities Be Involved in the Explanation of Phenomenal Consciousness? Análisis Filosófico 28 (1):35-84.score: 30.0
    In this paper I consider recent discussions within the representationalist theories of phenomenal consciousness, in particular, the discussions between first order representationalism (FOR) and higher order representationalism (HOR). I aim to show that either there is only a terminological dispute between them or, if the discussion is not simply terminological, then HOR is based on a misunderstanding of the phenomena that a theory of phenomenal consciousness should explain. First, I argue that we can defend first order representationalism from Carruthers' attacks (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. J. P. Laraudogoitia (2003). An Infinite System with Gravitation. Synthese 135 (3):339 - 346.score: 30.0
    The paper shows a new example of nonuniqueness of the solutionto Newtonian equations of motion for infinite gravitational systems. Unlike otherexamples, the gravitational field presents no singularity, nor are the non-gravitational forcesintroduced in the model singular (in particular, there are no collisions). The result is also ofinterest because it points to an interesting limitation of the elementary (Newtonian) formulationof classical mechanics.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Gustavo E. Romero & Daniela Pérez (2012). New Remarks on the Cosmological Argument. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 72 (2):103-113.score: 30.0
    We present a formal analysis of the Cosmological Argument in its two main forms: that due to Aquinas, and the revised version of the Kalam Cosmological Argument more recently advocated by William Lane Craig. We formulate these two arguments in such a way that each conclusion follows in first-order logic from the corresponding assumptions. Our analysis shows that the conclusion which follows for Aquinas is considerably weaker than what his aims demand. With formalizations that are logically valid in hand, we (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Berta M. Pérez (2012). El arte y su otro, o la estética antiidealista de Adorno. Dianoia 57 (68):29-63.score: 30.0
    A partir de la reivindicación de Adorno del poder crítico del arte, este trabajo confronta la posición de este pensador con las de Kant y Hegel a propósito de la cuestión de la autonomía del ámbito estético. Explica por qué Adorno considera que ni Kant, quien afirma esa autonomía, ni Hegel, quien, por el contrario, asume su heteronomía, logran reconocer (el poder de) la obra de arte y de la experiencia estética. Muestra luego que Adorno tomó conciencia de que ello (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Nahshon Perez (2011). On Compensation and Return: Can The 'Continuing Injustice Argument' for Compensating for Historical Injustices Justify Compensation for Such Injustices or the Return of Property? Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (2):151-168.score: 30.0
    This paper offers a critique of recent attempts, by George Sher and others to justify compensation to be paid to descendants of deceased victims of past wrongs. This recent attempt (the ‘continuing injustice argument’) is important as it endeavours to avoid some well-known critiques of previous attempts, such as the non-identity problem. Furthermore, this new attempt is grounded in individual rights, without invoking a more controversial collectivist assumption. The first step in this critique is to differentiate between compensation and restitution. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Enrique Bigné Alcañiz, Ruben Chumpitaz Cáceres & Rafael Currás Pérez (2010). Alliances Between Brands and Social Causes: The Influence of Company Credibility on Social Responsibility Image. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 96 (2):169-186.score: 30.0
    This research extends previous findings related to the positive influence of company credibility on a social Cause–Brand Alliance’s (CBA) persuasion mechanism. This study analyzes the mediating role of two dimensions of company credibility (trustworthiness and expertise) with regard to the influence of altruistic attributions and two types of brand–cause fit (functional and image fit) on corporate social responsibility image. A structural equation model tests the proposed framework with a sample of 299 consumers, and the results suggest that (1) image fit (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Adam Feltz, Maegan Harris & Ashley Perez (2012). Perspective in Intentional Action Attribution. Philosophical Psychology 25 (5):673-687.score: 30.0
    In two experiments, we demonstrate that intentional action intuitions vary as a function of whether one brings about or observes an event. In experiment 1a (N?=?38), participants were less likely to judge that they intended (M?=?2.53, 7 point scale) or intentionally (M?=?2.67) brought about a harmful event compared to intention (M?=?4.16) and intentionality (M?=?4.11) judgments made about somebody else. Experiments 1b and 1c confirmed and extended this pattern of actor-observer differences. Experiment 2 suggested that these actor-observer differences are not likely (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Elsa González, José Felix Lozano & Pedro Jesús Pérez (2009). Beyond the Conflict: Religion in the Public Sphere and Deliberative Democracy. Res Publica 15 (3):251-267.score: 30.0
    Traditionally, liberals have confined religion to the sphere of the ‘private’ or ‘non-political’. However, recent debates over the place of religious symbols in public spaces, state financing of faith schools, and tax relief for religious organisations suggest that this distinction is not particularly useful in easing the tension between liberal commitments to equality on the one hand, and freedom of religion on the other. This article deals with one aspect of this debate, which concerns whether members of religious communities should (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Adam Feltz, A. Perez & M. Harris (2012). Free Will, Causes, and Decisions: Individual Differences in Written Reports. Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (9-10):166-189.score: 30.0
    We present evidence indicating new individual differences with people's intuitions about the relation of determinism to freedom and moral responsibility. We analysed participants' written explanations of why a person acted. Participants offered one of either 'decision' or 'causal' based explanations of behaviours in some paradigmatic cases. Those who gave causal explanations tended to have more incompatibilist intuitions than those who gave decision explanations. Importantly, the affective content of a scenario influenced the type of explanation given. Scenarios containing highly affective actions (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. J. P. Laraudogoitia (2011). The Inverse Spaceship Paradox. Synthese 178 (3):429 - 435.score: 30.0
    In this article I propose what I call the inverse spaceship paradox. The article's interest lies in the fact that, contrary to what appears to be an implicit agreement in the literature on indeterminism, it shows that coming from infinity can be a perfectly predictable and therefore deterministic process in a classical universe.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. B. Carballo Pérez & H. García-Compeán (2012). Rarita-Schwinger Quantum Free Field Via Deformation Quantization. Foundations of Physics 42 (3):362-368.score: 30.0
    Rarita-Schwinger (RS) quantum free field is reexamined in the context of deformation quantization (DQ). It is interesting to consider this alternative for the specific case of the spin 3/2 field because DQ avoids the problem of dealing from the beginning with the extra degrees of freedom which appears in the conventional canonical quantization. It is found out that the subsidiary condition does not introduce any change either in the Wigner function or in other aspects of the Weyl-Wigner-Groenewold-Moyal formalism, such as: (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000