Search results for 'Yuchaio Chang' (try it on Scholar)

788 found
Order:
  1.  6
    Michael J. Barry, Pamela H. Wescott, Ellen J. Reifler, Yuchaio Chang & Benjamin W. Moulton (2008). Reactions of Potential Jurors to a Hypothetical Malpractice Suit Alleging Failure to Perform a Prostate-Specific Antigen Test. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):396-402.
    We conducted focus groups with 47 potential jurors who were presented with diferent scenarios in a hypothetical malpractice case involving failure to order a PSA test. Better documentation that a patient made an informed decision to decline a PSA test appeared to provide more medical-legal protection for physicians, especially with the use of a decision aid.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Michael J. Barry, Pamela H. Wescott, Ellen J. Reifler, Yuchaio Chang & Benjamin W. Moulton (2008). Reactions of Potential Jurors to a Hypothetical Malpractice Suit Alleging Failure to Perform a Prostate-Specific Antigen Test. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 36 (2):396-402.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  51
    Hasok Chang (2013). Hasok Chang. 2012. Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 28 (2):331-334.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Se-ho Chang (2007). Sagye Kim Chang-Saeng Ŭi Yehak Sasang. Kyŏngin Munhwasa.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  20
    Hasok Chang (2004). Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. OUP Usa.
    In Inventing Temperature, Chang takes a historical and philosophical approach to examine how scientists were able to use scientific method to test the reliability of thermometers; how they measured temperature beyond the reach of thermometers; and how they came to measure the reliability and accuracy of these instruments without a circular reliance on the instruments themselves. Chang discusses simple epistemic and technical questions about these instruments, which in turn lead to more complex issues about the solutions (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   44 citations  
  6.  62
    Rachel Ankeny, Hasok Chang, Marcel Boumans & Mieke Boon (2011). Introduction: Philosophy of Science in Practice. [REVIEW] European Journal for Philosophy of Science 1 (3):303-307.
    Introduction: philosophy of science in practice Content Type Journal Article Category Editorial Article Pages 303-307 DOI 10.1007/s13194-011-0036-4 Authors Rachel Ankeny, School of History & Politics, University of Adelaide, Napier Building, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia Hasok Chang, Department of History and Philosophy of Science, University of Cambridge, Free School Lane, Cambridge, CB2 3RH UK Marcel Boumans, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Amsterdam, Valckenierstraat 65-67, 1018 XE Amsterdam, The Netherlands Mieke Boon, Department of Philosophy, University (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  7. Hasok Chang (2008). Inventing Temperature: Measurement and Scientific Progress. Oxford University Press Usa.
    What is temperature, and how can we measure it correctly? These may seem like simple questions, but the most renowned scientists struggled with them throughout the 18th and 19th centuries. In Inventing Temperature, Chang examines how scientists first created thermometers; how they measured temperature beyond the reach of standard thermometers; and how they managed to assess the reliability and accuracy of these instruments without a circular reliance on the instruments themselves. In a discussion that brings together the history of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  8. Garma C. C. Chang (2001). The Buddhist Teaching of Totality: The Philosophy of Hwa Yen Buddhism. Penn State University Press.
    The Hwa Yen school of Mahāyāna Buddhism bloomed in China in the 7th and 8th centuries A.D. Today many scholars regard its doctrines of Emptiness, Totality, and Mind-Only as the crown of Buddhist thought and as a useful and unique philosophical system and explanation of man, world, and life as intuitively experienced in Zen practice. For the first time in any Western language Garma Chang explains and exemplifies these doctrines with references to both oriental masters and Western philosophers. The (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. Garma C. C. Chang (1990). The Buddhist Teaching of Totality: The Philosophy of Hwa Yen Buddhism. Penn State University Press.
    The Hwa Yen school of Mahāyāna Buddhism bloomed in China in the 7th and 8th centuries A.D. Today many scholars regard its doctrines of Emptiness, Totality, and Mind-Only as the crown of Buddhist thought and as a useful and unique philosophical system and explanation of man, world, and life as intuitively experienced in Zen practice. For the first time in any Western language Garma Chang explains and exemplifies these doctrines with references to both oriental masters and Western philosophers. The (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  65
    Ruth Chang (ed.) (1997). Incommensurability, Incomparability and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press.
    And what are the implications for moral and legal decision making? In this book, some of the sharpest minds in philosophy struggle with these questions.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   68 citations  
  11.  44
    Ruth Chang (2016). Parity, Imprecise Comparability, and the Repugnant Conclusion. Theoria 82 (2):183-215.
    This article explores the main similarities and differences between Derek Parfit’s notion of imprecise comparability and a related notion I have proposed of parity. I argue that the main difference between imprecise comparability and parity can be understood by reference to ‘the standard view’. The standard view claims that 1) differences between cardinally ranked items can always be measured by a scale of units of the relevant value, and 2) all rankings proceed in terms of the trichotomy of ‘better than’, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Ruth Chang (2002). The Possibility of Parity. Ethics 112 (4):659-688.
    This paper argues for the existence of a fourth positive generic value relation that can hold between two items beyond ‘better than’, ‘worse than’, and ‘equally good’: namely ‘on a par’.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   58 citations  
  13. Sheng‐Nan Chang, Jou‐Wei Lin, Shi‐Chi Liu & Juey‐Jen Hwang (2008). Measuring the Process of Quality of Care for ST‐Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction Through Data‐Mining of the Electronic Discharge Notes. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (1):116-120.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  32
    Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang (2013). Greenwash and Green Trust: The Mediation Effects of Green Consumer Confusion and Green Perceived Risk. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 114 (3):489-500.
    The paper explores the influence of greenwash on green trust and discusses the mediation roles of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk. The research object of this study focuses on Taiwanese consumers who have the purchase experience of information and electronics products in Taiwan. This research employs an empirical study by means of the structural equation modeling. The results show that greenwash is negatively related to green trust. Therefore, this study suggests that companies must reduce their greenwash behaviors to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  15.  52
    Ruth Chang (2015). Transformative Choices. Res Philosophica 92 (2):237-282.
    This paper proposes a way to understand transformative choices, choices that change ‘who you are.’ First, it distinguishes two broad models of transformative choice: 1) ‘event-based’ transformative choices in which some event—perhaps an experience—downstream from a choice transforms you, and 2) ‘choice-based’ transformative choices in which the choice itself—and not something downstream from the choice—transforms you. Transformative choices are of interest primarily because they purport to pose a challenge to standard approaches to rational choice. An examination of the event-based transformative (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  16. Ruth Chang (2013). Grounding Practical Normativity: Going Hybrid. Philosophical Studies 164 (1):163-187.
    In virtue of what is something a reason for action? That is, what makes a consideration a reason to act? This is a metaphysical or meta-normative question about the grounding of reasons for action. The answer to the grounding question has been traditionally given in ‘pure’, univocal terms. This paper argues that there is good reason to understand the ground of practical normativity as a hybrid of traditional ‘pure’ views. The paper 1) surveys the three leading ‘pure’ answers to the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  17.  30
    Ruth Chang (2016). “Comparativism: The Ground of Rational Choice,” in Errol Lord and Barry McGuire, Eds., Weighing Reasons (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 2016. In B. Maguire & E. Lord (eds.), Weighing Reasons. Oxford 213-240.
    What, normatively speaking, are the grounds of (objective) <span class='Hi'>rational</span> choice? This paper defends ‘comparativism’, the view that a comparative fact grounds <span class='Hi'>rational</span> choice. It examines three of the most serious challenges to comparativism: 1) that sometimes what grounds <span class='Hi'>rational</span> choice is an exclusionary-type relation among alternatives; 2) that an absolute fact such as that it’s your duty or conforms to the Categorial Imperative grounds <span class='Hi'>rational</span> choice; and 3) that <span class='Hi'>rational</span> choice between incomparables is possible, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  71
    Man Kit Chang (1998). Predicting Unethical Behavior: A Comparison of the Theory of Reasoned Action and the Theory of Planned Behavior. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (16):1825-1834.
    This study is a comparison of the validity of theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behavior as applied to the area of moral behavior (i.e., illegal copying of software) using structural equation modeling. Data were collected from 181 university students on the various components of the theories and used to asses the influence of attitude, subjective norm, and perceived behavioral control on the intention to make unauthorized software copies. Theory of planned behavior was found to be better than (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   49 citations  
  19. Ruth Chang (2009). Voluntarist Reasons and the Sources of Normativity. In David Sobel & Steven Wall (eds.), Reasons for Action. Cambridge University Press 243-71.
    This paper investigates two puzzles in practical reason and proposes a solution to them. First, sometimes, when we are practically certain that neither of two alternatives is better than or as good as the other with respect to what matters in the choice between them, it nevertheless seems perfectly rational to continue to deliberate, and sometimes the result of that deliberation is a conclusion that one alternative is better, where there is no error in one’s previous judgment. Second, there are (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  20.  19
    Won Yong Oh, Young Kyun Chang & Aleksey Martynov (2011). The Effect of Ownership Structure on Corporate Social Responsibility: Empirical Evidence From Korea. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):283-297.
    Relatively little research has examined the effects of ownership on the firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR). In addition, most of it has been conducted in the Western context such as the U.S. and Europe. Using a sample of 118 large Korean firms, we hypothesize that different types of shareholders will have distinct motivations toward the firm’s CSR engagement. We break down ownership into different groups of shareholders: institutional, managerial, and foreign ownerships. Results indicate a significant, positive relationship between CSR ratings (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  21. Ruth Chang (2005). Parity, Interval Value, and Choice. Ethics 115 (2):331-350.
    This paper begins with a response to Josh Gert’s challenge that ‘on a par with’ is not a sui generis fourth value relation beyond ‘better than’, ‘worse than’, and ‘equally good’. It then explores two further questions: can parity be modeled by an interval representation of value? And what should one rationally do when faced with items on a par? I argue that an interval representation of value is incompatible with the possibility that items are on a par (a mathematical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  22.  98
    Hasok Chang (2011). The Persistence of Epistemic Objects Through Scientific Change. Erkenntnis 75 (3):413-429.
    Why do some epistemic objects persist despite undergoing serious changes, while others go extinct in similar situations? Scientists have often been careless in deciding which epistemic objects to retain and which ones to eliminate; historians and philosophers of science have been on the whole much too unreflective in accepting the scientists’ decisions in this regard. Through a re-examination of the history of oxygen and phlogiston, I will illustrate the benefits to be gained from challenging and disturbing the commonly accepted continuities (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  23. Ruth Chang (2012). Are Hard Choices Cases of Incomparability? Philosophical Issues 22 (1):106-126.
    This paper presents an argument against the widespread view that ‘hard choices’ are hard because of the incomparability of the alternatives. The argument has two parts. First, I argue that any plausible theory of practical reason must be ‘comparativist’ in form, that is, it must hold that a comparative relation between the alternatives with respect to what matters in the choice determines a justified choice in that situation. If comparativist views of practical reason are correct, however, the incomparabilist view of (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  24.  13
    Yu-Shan Chen & Ching-Hsun Chang (2013). The Determinants of Green Product Development Performance: Green Dynamic Capabilities, Green Transformational Leadership, and Green Creativity. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 116 (1):107-119.
    Because no previous literature discusses the determinants of green product development performance, this study develops an original framework to fill the research gap. This study explores the influences of green dynamic capabilities and green transformational leadership on green product development performance and investigates the mediation role of green creativity. The results demonstrate that green dynamic capabilities and green transformational leadership positively influence green creativity and green product development performance. Besides, this study indicates that the positive relationships between green (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  25. H. Chang & S. Yi (2004). The Absolute and its Measurement; William Thomson on Temperature. Annals of Science 62 (3):281-308.
    In this paper we give a full account of the work of William Thomson on absolute temperature, which to this day provides the theoretical underpinnings for the most rigorous measurements of temperature. When Thomson fashioned his concepts of ‘absolute’ temperature, his main concern was to make the definition of temperature independent of the properties of particular thermometric substances . He tried out a succession of definitions based on the thermodynamics of ideal heat engines; most notably, in 1854 he gave the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  18
    Ruth Chang (2015). Value Incomparability and Incommensurability. In Iwao Hirose & Jonas Olson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. Oxford University Press
    This introductory article describes the phenomena of incommensurability and incomparability, how they are related, and why they are important. Since incomparability is the more significant phenomenon, the paper takes that as its focus. It gives a detailed account of what incomparability is, investigates the relation between the incomparability of values and the incomparability of alternatives for choice, distinguishes incomparability from the related phenomena of parity, indeterminacy, and noncomparability, and, finally, defends a view about practical justification that vindicates the importance of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Hasok Chang (2003). Preservative Realism and its Discontents: Revisiting Caloric. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):902-912.
    A popular and plausible response against Laudan's “pessimistic induction” has been what I call “preservative realism,” which argues that there have actually been enough elements of scientific knowledge preserved through major theory‐change processes, and that those elements can be accepted realistically. This paper argues against preservative realism, in particular through a critical review of Psillos's argument concerning the case of the caloric theory of heat. Contrary to his argument, the historical record of the caloric theory reveals that beliefs about the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  28.  21
    Ruth Chang (2004). Can Desires Provide Reasons for Action? In R. Jay Wallace, Philip Pettit, Samuel Scheffler & Michael Smith (eds.), Reason and Value: Themes From the Moral Philosophy of Joseph Raz. Oxford University Press 56--90.
    What sorts of consideration can be normative reasons for action? If we systematize the wide variety of considerations that can be cited as normative reasons, do we find that there is a single kind of consideration that can always be a reason? Desire-based theorists think that the fact that you want something or would want it under certain evaluatively neutral conditions can always be your normative reason for action. Value-based theorists, by contrast, think that what plays that role are evaluative (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  29.  52
    Ruth Chang (2002). Making Comparisons Count. Routledge.
    The central aim of this book is to answer two questions: Are alternatives for choice ever incomparable? and, In what ways can items be compared? The arguments offered suggest that alternatives for choice no matter how different are never incomparable, and that the ways in which items can be compared are richer and more varied than commonly supposed. This work is the first book length treatment of the topics of incomparability, value, and practical reason.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  30. Patricia M. Y. Chang (forthcoming). Book Review: Christian America? What Evangelicals Really Want. [REVIEW] Interpretation 57 (2):230-230.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Won-Yong Oh, Young Kyun Chang & Zheng Cheng (2016). When CEO Career Horizon Problems Matter for Corporate Social Responsibility: The Moderating Roles of Industry-Level Discretion and Blockholder Ownership. Journal of Business Ethics 133 (2):279-291.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32. Ruth Chang (2013). Commitment, Reasons, and the Will. In Russ Shafer-Landau (ed.), Oxford Studies in Metaethics, Vol. 8. Oxford University Press 74-113.
    This paper argues that there is a particular kind of ‘internal’ commitment typically made in the context of romantic love relationships that has striking meta-normative implications for how we understand the role of the will in practical normativity. Internal commitments cannot plausibly explain the reasons we have in committed relationships on the usual model – as triggering reasons that are already there, in the way that making a promise triggers a reason via a pre-existing norm of the form ‘If you (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  3
    Caroline F. Rowland, Franklin Chang, Ben Ambridge, Julian M. Pine & Elena Vm Lieven (2012). The Development of Abstract Syntax: Evidence From Structural Priming and the Lexical Boost. Cognition 125 (1):49-63.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  34.  24
    Hasok Chang (2010). The Hidden History of Phlogiston: How Philosophical Failure Can Generate Historiographical Refinement. Hyle 16 (2):47 - 79.
    Historians often feel that standard philosophical doctrines about the nature and development of science are not adequate for representing the real history of science. However, when philosophers of science fail to make sense of certain historical events, it is also possible that there is something wrong with the standard historical descriptions of those events, precluding any sensible explanation. If so, philosophical failure can be useful as a guide for improving historiography, and this constitutes a significant mode of productive interaction between (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  35.  5
    K. BocK, G. Dell, F. Chang & K. Onishi (2007). Persistent Structural Priming From Language Comprehension to Language Production☆☆☆. Cognition 104 (3):437-458.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  36.  3
    Jean D. Kabongo, Kiyoung Chang & Ying Li (2013). The Impact of Operational Diversity on Corporate Philanthropy: An Empirical Study of U.S. Companies. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 116 (1):49-65.
    This paper investigates the impact of diversity on corporate philanthropy. Compared to previous studies that have considered the influence of board diversity and CEO gender on corporate philanthropy, this study introduces the concept of operational diversity, which is the implementation of diversity programs at management, employee, and supply chain levels, and further, it explains why operational diversity influences corporate philanthropy, by using the premises of resource dependence theory. Second, this study also investigates the influence of board diversity on corporate philanthropy. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  37. Ruth Chang (2004). All Things Considered. Philosophical Perspectives 18 (1):1–22.
    One of the most common judgments of normative life takes the following form: With respect to some things that matter, one item is better than the other, with respect to other things that matter, the other item is better, but all things considered – that is, taking into account all the things that matter – the one item is better than the other. In this paper, I explore how all-things-considered judgments are possible, assuming that they are. In particular, I examine (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  38.  92
    Hasok Chang (2011). The Philosophical Grammar of Scientific Practice. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 25 (3):205 - 221.
    I seek to provide a systematic and comprehensive framework for the description and analysis of scientific practice?a philosophical grammar of scientific practice, ?grammar? as meant by the later Wittgenstein. I begin with the recognition that all scientific work, including pure theorizing, consists of actions, of the physical, mental, and ?paper-and-pencil? varieties. When we set out to see what it is that one actually does in scientific work, the following set of questions naturally emerge: who is doing what, why, and how? (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  39. Ruth Chang (2003). Introduction.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  40.  1
    Hasok Chang (2012). Is Water H2O? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Boston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  41.  74
    Hasok Chang, Operationalism. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  42.  11
    Hasok Chang (2015). The Chemical Revolution Revisited. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 49:91-98.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43. Ruth Chang (1997). Introduction. In Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason. Harvard University Press 1-34.
    This paper is the introduction to the volume. It gives an argumentative view of the philosophical landscape concerning incommensurability and incomparability. It argues that incomparability, not incommensurability, is the important phenomenon on which philosophers should be focusing and that the arguments for the existence of incomparability are so far not compelling.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  44. C. C. Chang (1967). Omitting Types of Prenex Formulas. Journal of Symbolic Logic 32 (1):61-74.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  45. Hasok Chang & Nancy Cartwright (1993). Causality and Realism in the EPR Experiment. Erkenntnis 38 (2):169 - 190.
    We argue against the common view that it is impossible to give a causal account of the distant correlations that are revealed in EPR-type experiments. We take a realistic attitude about quantum mechanics which implies a willingness to modify our familiar concepts according to its teachings. We object to the argument that the violation of factorizability in EPR rules out causal accounts, since such an argument is at best based on the desire to retain a classical description of nature that (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  46. Ruth Chang (2014). Practical Reasons: The Problem of Gridlock. In Barry Dainton & Howard Robinson (eds.), The Bloomsbury Companion to Analytic Philosophy. Continuum Publishing Corporation 474-499.
    The paper has two aims. The first is to propose a general framework for organizing some central questions about normative practical reasons in a way that separates importantly distinct issues that are often run together. Setting out this framework provides a snapshot of the leading types of view about practical reasons as well as a deeper understanding of what are widely regarded to be some of their most serious difficulties. The second is to use the proposed framework to uncover and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47. Ruth Chang (2015). Value Pluralism. In James Wright (ed.), International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edition, Vol. 25. Elsevier 21-26.
    ‘Value pluralism’ as traditionally understood is the metaphysical thesis that there are many values that cannot be ‘reduced’ to a single supervalue. While it is widely assumed that value pluralism is true, the case for value pluralism depends on resolution of a neglected question in value theory: how are values properly individuated? Value pluralism has been thought to be important in two main ways. If values are plural, any theory that relies on value monism, for example, hedonistic utilitarianism, is mistaken. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  17
    Hasok Chang (2009). Ontological Principles and the Intelligibility of Epistemic Activities. In Henk De Regt, Sabina Leonelli & Kai Eigner (eds.), Scientific Understanding: Philosophical Perspectives. University of Pittsburgh Press 64--82.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  49.  9
    Franklin Chang, Kathryn Bock & Adele E. Goldberg (2003). Can Thematic Roles Leave Traces of Their Places? Cognition 90 (1):29-49.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  50.  4
    Alan G. Sanfey, Mirre Stallen & Luke J. Chang (2014). Norms and Expectations in Social Decision-Making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 18 (4):172-174.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
1 — 50 / 788