Contemporary universities are characteristic of an evident proliferation of corporate discourse. A sole concentration on the production of new knowledge and the education of students does not ensure the prosperity or even survival of universities any longer, and equally important are the admission of elite students, the outcome-based evaluation of academic performance, the establishment of alumni network and also fundraising. This article examines how and to what extent this trend of marketization has invaded the order of discourse of Chinese universities. (...) The research methodology combines the paradigms of critical discourse analysis and the tenets of critical genre analysis [Bhatia VK Towards critical genre analysis. In: Bhatia VK, Flowerdew J and Jones RH Advances in Discourse Studies. London: Routledge, pp. 166–177], with particular attention paid to the notion of genre, interdiscursivity and conversationalization. The texts examined include ceremonial speeches, regulatory documents, insiders’ accounts and field notes. Analytical results show that the trend of marketization, in spite of a potential threat for academic integrity, does facilitate the institutional restructuring and transformation of universities in the context of Mainland China. (shrink)

This work illustrates China’s values and how they are practiced. After introducing readers to the theories, systematical structure, historical status, and influence of traditional Chinese values, it points out major developmental trends in connection with modernization. Further, it explores the significance of the contemporary reconstruction of Chinese values and argues that these values can be divided into three layers: values-based goals of national development, Chinese values concepts, and norms of values in a civil society. On this basis, it subsequently interprets (...) the core socialist values “Prosperity, Democracy, Civility and Harmony,” the value concepts “Freedom, Equality, Justice and Rule of Law” and values-based norms “Patriotism, Dedication, Integrity and Friendship.”. (shrink)

本书从历史诠释的历史、历史本体的诠释性、历史认识的诠释性、历史叙述的诠释性等多方面对历史诠释性进行了探索。.

本书从历史诠释的历史、历史本体的诠释性、历史认识的诠释性、历史叙述的诠释性等多方面对历史诠释性进行了探索。.

本书结合青年思想实际,阐述马克思主义的世界观和方法论,论述了矛盾分析,辩证否定,统筹兼顾,科学预见等25种思想和工作方法。.

本书分物质观、运动观、时空观、联系观、发展观、矛盾观、否定观、本质观、实践观等30个篇目,阐述了马克思主义世界观的基本观点。.

本书收入北京师范大学哲学系师生纪念该校成立20周年研究成果的17篇论文。文集就新世纪哲学、马克思主义哲学理论、社会科学的方法论、伦理学、古代美学思想、语言哲学、宗教哲学等方面进行了论述。.

本书收入北京师范大学哲学系师生纪念该校成立20周年研究成果的17篇论文。文集就新世纪哲学、马克思主义哲学理论、社会科学的方法论、伦理学、古代美学思想、语言哲学、宗教哲学等方面进行了论述。.

Name der Zeitschrift: Semiotica Jahrgang: 2018 Heft: 221 Seiten: 279-300.

If modernity is manifested as essentialism, postmodernity is manifested as anti-essentialism. Modernity is, in essence, human beings’ discovery of their own power, and is based on rational knowledge that has grasped the essence of things. In fact, in the discourse system of modernity, the various concepts of “essence” connote nothing but people’s imaginative constructions and rational conjectures about objects. In the past, our order, be it internal or external, was in essence guaranteed by God. Afterwards, all “essences”, as essences, must (...) rationally prove the reason for their existence. In the postmodern context and discourse system, God, and also the “human being” who has created essence, has “died”. We should not simply resume the belief in traditional essence, but should reconstruct, on the basis of a full understanding of the intellectual meaning of postmodernity’s challenges, some historicity, practicality, and the concept of essence that accords with the historical as well as communicative rationality. We must realize that the essence of things is the essence of particular things in a particular stage of development, internally containing infinite differences and variety. Only things with postmodern traits contain modernity, and only the concept of essence that conceives difference accords with time. (shrink)

本书是系统、深入总结中国社会价值观及其经验的一部具有代表性的著作。在介绍中国传统价值观的理论内涵、体系结构、历史地位与影响的同时,揭示其现代转化的理论创新点与发展新趋势；探讨当代中国社会进行价值观建构 的意义，分析当代中国社会主义核心价值体系建构过程中的经验和问题;提出价值观可以分成“国家发展的价值目标”“社会进步的价值理念”“公民素养的价值规范”三个层面，在此基础上，对当代中国国家发展的价值目标“ 富强、民主、文明、和谐”，当代中国社会进步的价值理念“自由、平等、公正、法治”,当代中国公民素养的价值规范“爱国、敬业、诚信、友善”的内容进行了系统阐释。本书是系统、深入总结中国社会价值观及其经验的一 部具有代表性的著作。在介绍中国传统价值观的理论内涵、体系结构、历史地位与影响的同时,揭示其现代转化的理论创新点与发展新趋势；探讨当代中国社会进行价值观建构的意义，分析当代中国社会主义核心价值体系建构过 程中的经验和问题;提出价值观可以分成“国家发展的价值目标”“社会进步的价值理念”“公民素养的价值规范”三个层面，在此基础上，对当代中国国家发展的价值目标“富强、民主、文明、和谐”，当代中国社会进步的价 值理念“自由、平等、公正、法治”,当代中国公民素养的价值规范“爱国、敬业、诚信、友善”的内容进行了系统阐释。.

Political discourse studies presuppose a necessary integration of the conventionally dichotomized analytical paradigms through inter- or intro-disciplinary endeavors. Interdisciplinary integration...