Search results for 'Zofia Stemplowska Carl' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska Carl (2011). Responsibility and Distributive Justice: An Introduction. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.score: 870.0
    This introductory chapter provides an overview of the recent debate about responsibility and distributive justice. It traces the recent philosophical focus on distributive justice to John Rawls and examines two arguments in his work which might be taken to contain the seeds of the focus on responsibility in later theories of distributive justice. It examines Ronald Dworkin's ‘equality of resources’, the ‘luck egalitarianism’ of Richard Arneson and G. A. Cohen, as well as the criticisms of their work put forward by (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.) (2011). Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.score: 810.0
    Under what conditions are people responsible for their choices and the outcomes of those choices? How could such conditions be fostered by liberal societies? Should what people are due as a matter of justice depend on what they are responsible for? For example, how far should healthcare provision depend on patients' past choices? What values would be realized and which hampered by making justice sensitive to responsibility? Would it give people what they deserve? Would it advance or hinder equality? The (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Carina Fourie (2012). Carl Knight and Zofia Stemplowska, Eds. , Responsibility and Distributive Justice . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 32 (2):111-113.score: 435.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Zofia Stemplowska (2008). What's Ideal About Ideal Theory? Social Theory and Practice 34 (3):319-340.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Zofia Stemplowska (2008). Holding People Responsible for What They Do Not Control. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):355-377.score: 240.0
    A crucial question for egalitarians, and theorists of distributive justice in general, is whether people can be held responsible for disadvantages they bring upon themselves. One response to this question states that it would be inegalitarian to hold people responsible on the basis of their actions if their actions are not ultimately under their control and reflect instead the good or bad luck the agent had in being the type of person who happens to act in a given way. I (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Zofia Stemplowska (2009). On the Real World Duties Imposed on Us by Human Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (4):466-487.score: 240.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Kimberley Brownlee & Zofia Stemplowska (2010). Introduction. Ethics 120 (2):209-211.score: 240.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Zofia Stemplowska (2013). Harmful Choices: Scanlon and Voorhoeve on Substantive Responsibility. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):1-488.score: 240.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Miriam Ronzoni & Zofia Stemplowska (2014). Introduction to Symposium on G.A. Cohen and Socialism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (2):117-118.score: 240.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Zofia Stemplowska (2013). Rescuing Luck Egalitarianism. Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (4):402-419.score: 240.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Shlomi Segall, Hillel Steiner, Zofia Stemplowska, Andrew Williams & Jo Wolff (2011). 8.1 The Concept of Agent Responsibility. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Zofia Stemplowska (2013). Brill Online Books and Journals. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4).score: 240.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Zofia Stemplowska (2011). Responsibility and Respect. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press. 115--35.score: 240.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. T. M. Scanlon (2013). Reply to Zofia Stemplowska. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):508-514.score: 140.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Matthew Lister (2012). Review of Carl Knight, Luck Egalitarianism. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):127-30.score: 24.0
  16. Michael Salter (1999). Neo-Fascist Legal Theory on Trial: An Interpretation of Carl Schmitt's Defence at Nuremberg From the Perspective of Franz Neumann's Critical Theory of Law. Res Publica 5 (2):161-193.score: 24.0
    This article addresses, from a Frankfurt School perspective on law identified with Franz Neumann and more recently Habermas, the attack upon the principles of war criminality formulated at the Nuremberg trials by the increasingly influential legal and political theory of Carl Schmitt. It also considers the contradictions within certain of the defence arguments that Schmitt himself resorted to when interrogated as a possible war crimes defendant at Nuremberg. The overall argument is that a distinctly internal, or “immanent”, form of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Matthias Lievens (2011). Singularity and Repetition in Carl Schmitts Vision of History. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):105-129.score: 24.0
    Despite the problematic political positions he adopted during his life span, the work of Carl Schmitt contains a fascinating argument in favour of `the political', which is understood as a plural symbolic space composed of friends and enemies who reciprocally recognise each other. Schmitt's struggle for the political is a struggle for a public spirit which accounts for this plurality. One of the terrains on which Schmitt wages this struggle is that of historical meaning. The image of history is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Mika Ojakangas (2012). Potentia Absoluta Et Potentia Ordinata Dei: On the Theological Origins of Carl Schmitt's Theory of Constitution. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 45 (4):505-517.score: 24.0
    In line with his theory of secularization according to which all significant concepts of the modern theory of the state are secularized theological concepts, Carl Schmitt argues in Constitutional Theory that people’s (Volk) constitution-making power in modern democracy is analogical to God’s potestas constituens in medieval theology. It is also undoubtedly possible to find a resemblance between Schmitt’s constitution-making power and God’s power as it is described in medieval theology. In the same sense as the constitution-making power is absolutely (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Michael Salter (2013). Carl Schmitt on the Secularisation of Religious Texts as a Resacralisation of Jurisprudence? International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):113-147.score: 24.0
    Carl Schmitt, an increasingly influential German law professor, developed a provocative and historically oriented model of “political theology” with specific relevance to legal scholarship and the authorship of constitutional texts. His “political theology” is best understood neither as an expressly theological discourse within constitutional law, nor as a uniquely legal discourse shaped by a hidden theological agenda. Instead, it addresses the possibility of the continual resurfacing of theological ideas and beliefs within legal discourses of, for instance, sovereignty, the force (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Jean-Christophe Angaut (2009). Carl Schmitt, lecteur de Bakounine. Astérion 6.score: 24.0
    Mentionné à plusieurs reprises bien qu’aucun de ses écrits ne soit cité, Bakounine occupe une place particulière dans quelques-uns des principaux textes de Carl Schmitt (Théologie politique, La dictature, Le concept de politique). Les thèmes que Schmitt choisit de repérer chez Bakounine (satanisme, naturalisme, nature religieuse de l’autorité, refus de la médiation), s’ils sont l’indice d’une connaissance précise de l’œuvre du révolutionnaire russe, permettent également de l’inscrire dans une opposition terme à terme avec les théoriciens de la contre-révolution. La (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Michael S. Jones (2010). Carl E. Braaten, No Other Gospel! Christianity Among the World's Religions. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 3 (9):162-167.score: 24.0
    Carl E. Braaten, No Other Gospel! Christianity among the World's Religions Minneapolis, USA: Fortress Press, 1992. Paperback: 146 pp. including endnotes and index.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. José Daniel Parra Quintero (2010). Between Carl Schmitt and Thomas Hobbes: A Study of Modern Liberalism From Leo Strauss' Thought. [Spanish]. Eidos 12:48-86.score: 24.0
    Normal 0 21 false false false ES-CO X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabla normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} This essay presents a reading of modern liberalism from Leo Strauss´thought. Starting with his analysis of Carl Schmitt’s Concept of the Political and its critique of liberal “neutralization and depolitization”, Strauss posits an affirmation of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Christian E. Roques (2009). Radiographie de l'ennemi : Carl Schmitt et le romantisme politique. Astérion 6.score: 24.0
    C’est grâce à son essai Politische Romantik, publié en 1919, que Carl Schmitt fait une entrée remarquée sur la scène intellectuelle allemande. L’ouvrage se présente comme une charge systématique et radicale contre la tradition allemande du « romantisme politique », et fut vivement discuté dans les années qui suivirent sa publication. Mais aujourd’hui il se trouve relégué parmi les œuvres de jeunesse de Schmitt et reste rarement étudié par la recherche, qui le lit au mieux comme une belle contribution (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Martin Amrein & Kärin Nickelsen (2008). The Gentleman and the Rogue: The Collaboration Between Charles Darwin and Carl Vogt. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 41 (2):237 - 266.score: 24.0
    This paper investigates the relationship between the eminent 19th-century naturalists Charles Darwin and Carl Vogt. On two separate occasions, Vogt asked Darwin for permission to translate some of the latter’s books into German, and in both cases Darwin refused. It has generally been assumed that Darwin turned down Vogt as a translator because of the latter’s reputation as a radical libertine who was extremely outspoken in his defence of scientific materialism and atheism. However, this explanation does not fit the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Carl Knight & Zofia Stemploska (eds.) (2011). Justice and Responsibility. Oxford University Press.score: 24.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Carl G. Hempel (2001). The Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel: Studies in Science, Explanation, and Rationality. Oxford University Press.score: 21.0
    Editor James Fetzer presents an analytical and historical introduction and a comprehensive bibliography together with selections of many of Carl G. Hempel's most important studies to give students and scholars an ideal opportunity to appreciate the enduring contributions of one of the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Celina Maria Bragagnolo (2011). Secularization, History, and Political Theology: The Hans Blumenberg and Carl Schmitt Debate. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):84-104.score: 21.0
    Considering the enormous outpouring of scholarly work on Schmitt over the last two decades, the absence of an adequate treatment in English of Schmitt's concept of history and the problem of secularization is quite surprising. After all, it is Schmitt himself who claims that “all human beings who plan and attempt to unite the masses behind their plans engage in some form of philosophy of history,” such that the attempt to make sense of Schmitt's program remains incomplete without a serious (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Nikolay Milkov (2013). Carl Hempel: Whose Philosopher? In N. Milkov & V. Peckhaus (eds.), The Berlin Group and the Philosophy of Logical Empiricism. Springer, pp. 293-308. 293--309.score: 21.0
    Recently, Michael Friedman has claimed that virtually all the seeds of Hempel’s philosophical development trace back to his early encounter with the Vienna Circle (Friedman 2003, 94). As opposed, however, to Friedman’s view of the principal early influences on Hempel, we shall see that those formative influences originated rather with the Berlin Group. Hempel, it is true, spent the fall term of 1929 as a student at the University of Vienna, and, thanks to a letter of recommendation from Hans Reichenbach, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Lothar Schäfer (2006). A Response to Carl Helrich: The Limitations and Promise of Quantum Theory. Zygon 41 (3):583-591.score: 21.0
  30. Alejandro Celis (2006). Congruencia, integridad y transparencia. El legado de Carl Rogers. Polis 15.score: 21.0
    En los orígenes de la psicología humanista, diversos autores claves -entre ellos, Rogers- destacaron la importancia que la congruencia o autenticidad tiene para la salud integral de las personas. Tomando esta referencia como punto de partida, el autor examina lo que considera un momento crítico en la historia, teñido de escepticismo y cinismo, y sus manifestaciones en la vida actual. Finalmente, propone un modelo de autodesarrollo que considera tres niveles en cada ser humano: el nivel animal, el propiamente humano y (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Ramón Campderrich Bravo (2009). ¿ Derecho internacional O Guerra imperial? Hans Kelsen Y Carl Schmitt Ante la pacificación de las relaciones interestatales Por medio Del derecho. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 43:19 - 38.score: 21.0
    Th e mai n idea s o f Han s K else n an d Car l Schmit t abou t w a r an d peac e i n inte r national relation s are , i n thi s a r ticle , unfolde d sta r tin g fro m th e ide a o f ‘juridica l paci f ism’ . Their usefulnes s fo r th e contempora r y debat e o n “humanitaria n (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Nadia Moro (2013). Carl Stumpf. [REVIEW] de Musica 17:97-102.score: 21.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Afschin Gandjour & Karl Wilhelm Lauterbach (2003). Inductive Reasoning in Medicine: Lessons From Carl Gustav Hempel's 'Inductive‐Statistical' Model. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):161-169.score: 21.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Aleksandar Molnar (2010). Carl Schmitt's Attitude Towards Total War and Total Enemy on the Eve of the Outbreak of WWII. Filozofija I Društvo 21 (1):31-49.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Tristan Storme (2012). Carl Schmitt, un marcionite moderne ? Revue des Sciences Philosophiques Et Théologiques 4:835-860.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2003). Wozu Brauchte Carl Stumpf Sachverhalte? Brentano Studien 10:67-82.score: 21.0
  37. Carl G. Hempel, Donald Davidson & Nicholas Rescher (eds.) (1970). Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht,D. Reidel.score: 21.0
    Reminiscences of Peter, by P. Oppenheim.--Natural kinds, by W. V. Quine.--Inductive independence and the paradoxes of confirmation, by J. Hintikka.--Partial entailment as a basis for inductive logic, by W. C. Salmon.--Are there non-deductive logics?, by W. Sellars.--Statistical explanation vs. statistical inference, by R. C. Jeffre--Newcomb's problem and two principles of choice, by R. Nozick.--The meaning of time, by A. Grünbaum.--Lawfulness as mind-dependent, by N. Rescher.--Events and their descriptions: some considerations, by J. Kim.--The individuation of events, by D. Davidson.--On properties, by (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Nathan Nobis (2004). Carl Cohen's 'Kind' Arguments for Animal Rights and Against Human Rights. Journal of Applied Philosophy 21 (1):43–59.score: 18.0
    Carl Cohen's arguments against animal rights are shown to be unsound. His strategy entails that animals have rights, that humans do not, the negations of those conclusions, and other false and inconsistent implications. His main premise seems to imply that one can fail all tests and assignments in a class and yet easily pass if one's peers are passing and that one can become a convicted criminal merely by setting foot in a prison. However, since his moral principles imply (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Arnon Levy (2009). Explaining What? Review of Explaining the Brain: Mechanisms and the Mosaic Unity of Neuroscience by Carl F. Craver. Biology and Philosophy 24 (1).score: 18.0
    Carl Craver’s recent book offers an account of the explanatory and theoretical structure of neuroscience. It depicts it as centered around the idea of achieving mechanistic understanding, i.e., obtaining knowledge of how a set of underlying components interacts to produce a given function of the brain. Its core account of mechanistic explanation and relevance is causal-manipulationist in spirit, and offers substantial insight into casual explanation in brain science and the associated notion of levels of explanation. However, the focus on (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. John P. McCormick (1994). Fear, Technology, and the State: Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, and the Revival of Hobbes in Weimar and National Socialist Germany. Political Theory 22 (4):619-652.score: 18.0
    It is striking that one of the most consequential representatives of [the] abstract scientific orientation of the seventeenth century [Thomas Hobbes] became so personalistic. This is because as a juristic thinker he wanted to grasp the reality of societal life just as much as he, as a philosopher and a natural scientist, wanted to grasp the reality of nature.... [J]uristic thought in those days had not yet become so overpowered by the natural sciences that he, in the intensity of his (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Carlo Altini (2010). 'Potentia' as 'Potestas': An Interpretation of Modern Politics Between Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt. Philosophy and Social Criticism 36 (2):231-252.score: 18.0
    The present article discusses the relationship between might ( potentia ) and power ( potestas ) as it has unfolded throughout the modern age, from Thomas Hobbes to Carl Schmitt. Hobbes indicates the way forward for a progressive linguistic and conceptual coincidence of potentia and potestas : the goal of Hobbesian political philosophy (the search for peace and security) necessitates the reduction of potentia to potestas through the elimination of the content of actus . Schmitt accepts this reduction, by (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Wesley C. Salmon (1999). The Spirit of Logical Empiricism: Carl G. Hempel's Role in Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Science 66 (3):333-350.score: 18.0
    In this paper, I discuss the key role played by Carl G. Hempel's work on theoretical realism and scientific explanation in effecting a crucial philosophical transition between the beginning and the end of the twentieth century. At the beginning of the century, the dominant view was that science is incapable of furnishing explanations of natural phenomena; at the end, explanation is widely viewed as an important, if not the primary, goal of science. In addition to its intellectual benefits, this (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. H. G. Callaway (1996). Review: Carl R. Hausman, Charles S. Peirce's Evolutionary Philosophy. [REVIEW] Dialectica 50 (No. 2):153-161.score: 18.0
    Carl Hausman is a former editor of The Journal of Speculative Philosophy, a revival of one of the first American philosophy journals, where Peirce published some of his early work; and Hausman has devoted a good deal of his career to Peirce scholarship. He interprets Peirce’s thought “as a fallibilistic foundationalism that affirms a unique realism according to which what is real is a dynamic, evolving extramental condition.” The theme is an interesting one partly in view of the many (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Marc de Wilde (2011). Meeting Opposites: The Political Theologies of Walter Benjamin and Carl Schmitt. Philosophy and Rhetoric 44 (4):363-381.score: 18.0
    On 9 December 1930, Walter Benjamin sent a copy of his book The Origin of German Tragic Drama to Carl Schmitt, accompanied by a letter in which he expressed his indebtedness to Schmitt: "You will very quickly recognize how much my book is indebted to you for its presentation of the doctrine of sovereignty in the seventeenth century. Perhaps I may say, in addition, that I have also derived from your later works, especially Die Diktatur, a confirmation of my (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Andrew Johnson, Viral Politics: Jacques Derrida's Account of the Auto-Immune Logic of Carl Schmitt's Political Philosophy.score: 18.0
    pseudo-Master's thesis Since Jacques Derrida’s 1989 essay “Force of Law: the Mystical Foundations of Authority,” Carl Schmitt has been a perennial subject of Derrida’s political critique. I will argue that Derrida’s concept of auto-immunity is uniquely applicable to Derrida’s interpretation of Schmitt’s political philosophy. Therefore, my argument will consist of two interrelated but equally divergent parts; the digressive structure will attempt to mimic Derrida’s complex style of weaving opposed concepts into a coherent whole. First, I will demonstrate the many (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. John P. McCormick (1997). Carl Schmitt's Critique of Liberalism: Against Politics as Technology. Cambridge University Press.score: 18.0
    This is the first in-depth critical appraisal in English of the political, legal, and cultural writings of Carl Schmitt, perhaps this century's most brilliant critic of liberalism. It offers an assessment of this most sophisticated of fascist theorists without attempting either to apologise for or demonise him. Schmitt's Weimar writings confront the role of technology as it finds expression through the principles and practices of liberalism. Contemporary political conditions such as disaffection with liberalism and the rise of extremist political (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. James H. Fetzer (ed.) (2000). Science, Explanation, and Rationality: Aspects of the Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel. Oxford University Press.score: 18.0
    Carl G. Hempel exerted greater influence upon philosophers of science than any other figure during the 20th century. In this far-reaching collection, distinguished philosophers contribute valuable studies that illuminate and clarify the central problems to which Hempel was devoted. The essays enhance our understanding of the development of logical empiricism as the major intellectual influence for scientifically-oriented philosophers and philosophically-minded scientists of the 20th century.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Richard Wolin (1992). Carl Schmitt: The Conservative Revolutionary Habitus and the Aesthetics of Horror. Political Theory 20 (3):424-447.score: 18.0
    Carl Schmitt's polemical discussion of political Romanticism conceals the aestheticizing oscillations of his own political thought. In this respect, too, a kinship of spirit with the fascist intelligentsia reveals itself. Jürgen Habermas, “The Horrors of Autonomy: Carl Schmitt in English”The pinnacle of great politics is the moment in which the enemy comes into view in concrete clarity as the enemy.Carl Schmitt, The Concept of the Political (1927).
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Thomas Moore (2011). The Paradox of the Political: Carl Schmitt's Autonomous Account of Politics. The European Legacy 15 (6):721-734.score: 18.0
    Carl Schmitt's Concept of the Political advances an understanding of the political in which the political is assessed in terms of the autonomy of the friend-and-enemy distinction. This article questions the autonomous foundations of Schmitt's concept of the political. Ultimately, Schmitt's desire to establish the autonomous nature of the political, allowing the specifically political antithesis to achieve mastery over all other forms of discourse, is replete with paradox. Whilst Schmitt endeavours to establish the autonomy of the political?where the political (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Johan Tralau (2010). Thomas Hobbes, Carl Schmitt, and Three Conceptions of Politics. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (2):261-274.score: 18.0
    In this introduction, the author argues that Thomas Hobbes and Carl Schmitt can help us rediscover the foundations of politics and political thought. In the years since World War II, the prevailing paradigm of politics has largely centred on the redistribution of resources. Hobbes and Schmitt, by contrast, help us appreciate two other conceptions of politics. Firstly, these thinkers averred that it is the problem of order ? not redistribution ? which is the fundamental concern for any society. Secondly, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000