Search results for 'Zofia Stemplowska Carl' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska Carl (2011). Responsibility and Distributive Justice: An Introduction. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press
    This introductory chapter provides an overview of the recent debate about responsibility and distributive justice. It traces the recent philosophical focus on distributive justice to John Rawls and examines two arguments in his work which might be taken to contain the seeds of the focus on responsibility in later theories of distributive justice. It examines Ronald Dworkin's ‘equality of resources’, the ‘luck egalitarianism’ of Richard Arneson and G. A. Cohen, as well as the criticisms of their work (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.) (2011). Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press.
    Under what conditions are people responsible for their choices and the outcomes of those choices? How could such conditions be fostered by liberal societies? Should what people are due as a matter of justice depend on what they are responsible for? For example, how far should healthcare provision depend on patients' past choices? What values would be realized and which hampered by making justice sensitive to responsibility? Would it give people what they deserve? Would it advance or hinder equality? The (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  3. Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.) (2014). Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press Uk.
    This volume presents new essays investigating a difficult theoretical and practical problem: how do we find a place for individual responsibility in a theory of distributive justice? Does what we choose affect what we deserve? Would making justice sensitive to responsibility give people what they deserve? Would it advance or hinder equality?
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  4
    Carina Fourie (2012). Carl Knight and Zofia Stemplowska, Eds. , Responsibility and Distributive Justice . Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 32 (2):111-113.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Zofia Stemplowska (2008). What's Ideal About Ideal Theory? Social Theory and Practice 34 (3):319-340.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   17 citations  
  6.  24
    Zofia Stemplowska (2013). Rescuing Luck Egalitarianism. Journal of Social Philosophy 44 (4):402-419.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  67
    Zofia Stemplowska (2013). Harmful Choices: Scanlon and Voorhoeve on Substantive Responsibility. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):1-488.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  24
    Timothy Fowler & Zofia Stemplowska (2015). The Asymmetry Objection Rides Again: On the Nature and Significance of Justificatory Disagreement. Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (2):133-146.
    Political liberalism offers perhaps the most developed and dominant account of justice and legitimacy in the face of disagreement among citizens. A prominent objection states that the view arbitrarily treats differently disagreement about the good, such as on what makes for a good life, and disagreement about justice. In the presence of reasonable disagreement about the good, political liberals argue that the state must be neutral, but they do not suggest a similar response given reasonable disagreement about what justice requires. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  4
    Matthew Clayton & Zofia Stemplowska (2015). Dignified Morality. Jurisprudence 6 (2):309-326.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  80
    Zofia Stemplowska (2008). Holding People Responsible for What They Do Not Control. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 7 (4):355-377.
    A crucial question for egalitarians, and theorists of distributive justice in general, is whether people can be held responsible for disadvantages they bring upon themselves. One response to this question states that it would be inegalitarian to hold people responsible on the basis of their actions if their actions are not ultimately under their control and reflect instead the good or bad luck the agent had in being the type of person who happens to act in a given way. I (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  58
    Zofia Stemplowska (2009). On the Real World Duties Imposed on Us by Human Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 40 (4):466-487.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12. Zofia Stemplowska (2014). Sen's Modest Justice. Jurisprudence 5 (2):376-384.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13.  12
    Miriam Ronzoni & Zofia Stemplowska (2014). Introduction to Symposium on G.A. Cohen and Socialism. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 13 (2):117-118.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  41
    Kimberley Brownlee & Zofia Stemplowska (2010). Introduction. Ethics 120 (2):209-211.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  5
    Ben Jackson and Zofia Stemplowska (2015). On Frank Knight’s “Freedom as Fact and Criterion”. Ethics 125 (2):552-554,.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16. Shlomi Segall, Hillel Steiner, Zofia Stemplowska, Andrew Williams & Jo Wolff (2011). 8.1 The Concept of Agent Responsibility. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press
  17. Ben Jackson & Zofia Stemplowska (2015). On Frank Knight’s “Freedom as Fact and Criterion”. Ethics 125 (2):552-554.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Zofia Stemplowska (2013). Brill Online Books and Journals. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Zofia Stemplowska (2011). Responsibility and Respect. In Carl Knight & Zofia Stemplowska (eds.), Responsibility and Distributive Justice. Oxford University Press 115--35.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  34
    T. M. Scanlon (2013). Reply to Zofia Stemplowska. Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):508-514.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21. Emily McTernan (2014). Responsibility and Distributive Justice, Ed.Carl Knight andZofia Stemplowska.Oxford University Press,2011, 309 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 30 (3):529-534.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  60
    Uwe Steinhoff, The Uselessness of Rawls’s “Ideal Theory”.
    Over the years a few authors have argued that Rawls’s ideal theory of justice is useless for the real world. This criticism has been largely ignored by Rawlsians, but in the light of a recent accumulation of such criticisms, some authors (in particular Holly Lawford-Smith, A. John Simmons, Zofia Stemplowska and Laura Valentini) have tried to defend ideal theory. In this article I will recapitulate the precise problem with Rawls’s ideal theory, argue that some of Rawls’s defenders misconceive (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  1
    William E. Scheuerman (1999). Carl Schmitt: The End of Law. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
    This is the first full-length study in English of twentieth-century Germany's most influential authoritarian right-wing political theorist, Carl Schmitt, that focuses on the central place of his attack on the liberal rule of law. This is also the first book in any language to devote substantial attention to Schmitt's subterranean influence on some of the most important voices in political thought in the United States after 1945.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  24.  66
    Matthew Lister (2012). Review of Carl Knight, Luck Egalitarianism. [REVIEW] Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):127-30.
  25.  38
    James H. Fetzer (ed.) (2000). Science, Explanation, and Rationality: Aspects of the Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel. Oxford University Press.
    Carl G. Hempel exerted greater influence upon philosophers of science than any other figure during the 20th century. In this far-reaching collection, distinguished philosophers contribute valuable studies that illuminate and clarify the central problems to which Hempel was devoted. The essays enhance our understanding of the development of logical empiricism as the major intellectual influence for scientifically-oriented philosophers and philosophically-minded scientists of the 20th century.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26.  23
    Michael Salter (1999). Neo-Fascist Legal Theory on Trial: An Interpretation of Carl Schmitt's Defence at Nuremberg From the Perspective of Franz Neumann's Critical Theory of Law. Res Publica 5 (2):161-193.
    This article addresses, from a Frankfurt School perspective on law identified with Franz Neumann and more recently Habermas, the attack upon the principles of war criminality formulated at the Nuremberg trials by the increasingly influential legal and political theory of Carl Schmitt. It also considers the contradictions within certain of the defence arguments that Schmitt himself resorted to when interrogated as a possible war crimes defendant at Nuremberg. The overall argument is that a distinctly internal, or “immanent”, form (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  27.  10
    Mika Ojakangas (2012). Potentia Absoluta Et Potentia Ordinata Dei: On the Theological Origins of Carl Schmitt's Theory of Constitution. [REVIEW] Continental Philosophy Review 45 (4):505-517.
    In line with his theory of secularization according to which all significant concepts of the modern theory of the state are secularized theological concepts, Carl Schmitt argues in Constitutional Theory that people’s (Volk) constitution-making power in modern democracy is analogical to God’s potestas constituens in medieval theology. It is also undoubtedly possible to find a resemblance between Schmitt’s constitution-making power and God’s power as it is described in medieval theology. In the same sense as the constitution-making power is (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  13
    Michael Salter (2013). Carl Schmitt on the Secularisation of Religious Texts as a Resacralisation of Jurisprudence? International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 26 (1):113-147.
    Carl Schmitt, an increasingly influential German law professor, developed a provocative and historically oriented model of “political theology” with specific relevance to legal scholarship and the authorship of constitutional texts. His “political theology” is best understood neither as an expressly theological discourse within constitutional law, nor as a uniquely legal discourse shaped by a hidden theological agenda. Instead, it addresses the possibility of the continual resurfacing of theological ideas and beliefs within legal discourses of, for instance, sovereignty, the force (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  7
    Jean-Christophe Angaut (2009). Carl Schmitt, lecteur de Bakounine. Astérion 6.
    Mentionné à plusieurs reprises bien qu’aucun de ses écrits ne soit cité, Bakounine occupe une place particulière dans quelques-uns des principaux textes de Carl Schmitt (Théologie politique, La dictature, Le concept de politique). Les thèmes que Schmitt choisit de repérer chez Bakounine (satanisme, naturalisme, nature religieuse de l’autorité, refus de la médiation), s’ils sont l’indice d’une connaissance précise de l’œuvre du révolutionnaire russe, permettent également de l’inscrire dans une opposition terme à terme avec les théoriciens de la contre-révolution. La (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  6
    Michael S. Jones (2010). Carl E. Braaten, No Other Gospel! Christianity Among the World's Religions. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 3 (9):162-167.
    Carl E. Braaten, No Other Gospel! Christianity among the World's Religions Minneapolis, USA: Fortress Press, 1992. Paperback: 146 pp. including endnotes and index.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  5
    Martin Amrein & Kärin Nickelsen (2008). The Gentleman and the Rogue: The Collaboration Between Charles Darwin and Carl Vogt. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 41 (2):237 - 266.
    This paper investigates the relationship between the eminent 19th-century naturalists Charles Darwin and Carl Vogt. On two separate occasions, Vogt asked Darwin for permission to translate some of the latter’s books into German, and in both cases Darwin refused. It has generally been assumed that Darwin turned down Vogt as a translator because of the latter’s reputation as a radical libertine who was extremely outspoken in his defence of scientific materialism and atheism. However, this explanation does not fit (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  5
    Christian E. Roques (2009). Radiographie de l'ennemi : Carl Schmitt et le romantisme politique. Astérion 6.
    C’est grâce à son essai Politische Romantik, publié en 1919, que Carl Schmitt fait une entrée remarquée sur la scène intellectuelle allemande. L’ouvrage se présente comme une charge systématique et radicale contre la tradition allemande du « romantisme politique », et fut vivement discuté dans les années qui suivirent sa publication. Mais aujourd’hui il se trouve relégué parmi les œuvres de jeunesse de Schmitt et reste rarement étudié par la recherche, qui le lit au mieux comme une belle contribution (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  4
    Aleksandar Molnar (2010). Carl Schmitt's Attitude Towards Total War and Total Enemy on the Eve of the Outbreak of WWII. Filozofija I Društvo 21 (1):31-49.
    Carl Schmitt is usually perceived as the theorist of total state, total war and total hostility. In the article, the author however tries to show that from 1937 to 1944, Schmitt was arguing that total war and total hostility were dangerous for Germany and warned against perpetuation of all efforts to totalize enemy that started in 1914. In his theoretical endeavors in this period there was place for the total state only - and especially for the total state strong (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  12
    Matthias Lievens (2011). Singularity and Repetition in Carl Schmitts Vision of History. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):105-129.
    Despite the problematic political positions he adopted during his life span, the work of Carl Schmitt contains a fascinating argument in favour of `the political', which is understood as a plural symbolic space composed of friends and enemies who reciprocally recognise each other. Schmitt's struggle for the political is a struggle for a public spirit which accounts for this plurality. One of the terrains on which Schmitt wages this struggle is that of historical meaning. The image of history is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  5
    José Daniel Parra Quintero (2010). Between Carl Schmitt and Thomas Hobbes: A Study of Modern Liberalism From Leo Strauss' Thought. [Spanish]. Eidos: Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad Del Norte 12:48-86.
    Normal 0 21 false false false ES-CO X-NONE X-NONE MicrosoftInternetExplorer4 /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Tabla normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-qformat:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-theme-font:minor-fareast; mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-bidi-font-family:"Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-theme-font:minor-bidi;} This essay presents a reading of modern liberalism from Leo Strauss´thought. Starting with his analysis of Carl Schmitt’s Concept of the Political and its critique of liberal “neutralization and depolitization”, Strauss posits an affirmation of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Carl Gustav Hempel, Nicholas Rescher & Donald Davidson (1970). Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. A Tribute on the Occasion of His Sixty-Fifth Birthday. Essays by Donald Davidson [and Others] Edited by Nicholas Rescher. --. [REVIEW] D. Reidel.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Carl Gustav Hempel, Wilhelm Karl Essler, Hilary Putnam & Wolfgang Stegmüller (1985). Epistemology, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science Essays in Honour of Carl G. Hempel on the Occasion of His 80th Birthday, January 8th, 1985. [REVIEW]
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Kay Herrmann (forthcoming). Klaus Hentschel and Dieter Hoffmann (Eds.), Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker: Physics – Philosophy – Peace Research. [REVIEW] Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie.
    Klaus Hentschel and Dieter Hoffmann (Eds.) Carl Friedrich von Weizsäcker: Physics – Philosophy – Peace Research -/- Review by Kay Herrmann.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Duncan Kelly (2003). The State of the Political: Conceptions of Politics and the State in the Thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Franz Neumann. OUP/British Academy.
    The State of the Political challenges traditional interpretations of the political thought of Max Weber, Carl Schmitt, and Franz Neumann. Focusing on their adaptation of a German tradition of state-legal theory, the book offers a scholarly, contextualized account of the interrelationship between their political thought and practical political criticism. Dr Kelly criticizes the typical separation of these writers, and offers a substantial reinterpretation of modern German political thought in a period of profound transition, in particular the relationship between (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Carl Knight & Zofia Stemploska (eds.) (2011). Justice and Responsibility. Oxford University Press.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  42
    Nikolay Milkov (2015). Carl Stumpf’s Debt to Hermann Lotze. In Denis Fisette & Riccardo Martinelli (eds.), Philosophy from an Empirical Standpoint: Essays on Carl Stumpf. Brill 101-122.
    Carl Stumpf (1848–1937) is a key figure in the fin de siècle germanophone philosophy. Unfortunately, after the World War One, the interest towards Stumpf as a philosopher waned. One of the reasons was that already in the 1920s the attention of the mainstream philosophers shifted in direction of the rising rivalry between analytic and continental philosophy. The interest towards Carl Stumpf’s philosophy was revived only in the last twenty years or so. Great service in this provided the Neo-Brentanists. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Carl G. Hempel, Donald Davidson & Nicholas Rescher (eds.) (1970). Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht,D. Reidel.
    Reminiscences of Peter, by P. Oppenheim.--Natural kinds, by W. V. Quine.--Inductive independence and the paradoxes of confirmation, by J. Hintikka.--Partial entailment as a basis for inductive logic, by W. C. Salmon.--Are there non-deductive logics?, by W. Sellars.--Statistical explanation vs. statistical inference, by R. C. Jeffre--Newcomb's problem and two principles of choice, by R. Nozick.--The meaning of time, by A. Grünbaum.--Lawfulness as mind-dependent, by N. Rescher.--Events and their descriptions: some considerations, by J. Kim.--The individuation of events, by D. Davidson.--On properties, by (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   36 citations  
  43. Chantal Mouffe (2003). The Challenge of Carl Schmitt. Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 65 (1):158-159.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  44. Nikolay Milkov (2013). Carl Hempel: Whose Philosopher? In N. Milkov & V. Peckhaus (eds.), The Berlin Group and the Philosophy of Logical Empiricism. Springer, Pp. 293-308 293--309.
    Recently, Michael Friedman has claimed that virtually all the seeds of Hempel’s philosophical development trace back to his early encounter with the Vienna Circle (Friedman 2003, 94). As opposed, however, to Friedman’s view of the principal early influences on Hempel, we shall see that those formative influences originated rather with the Berlin Group. Hempel, it is true, spent the fall term of 1929 as a student at the University of Vienna, and, thanks to a letter of recommendation from Hans Reichenbach, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  83
    Carl G. Hempel (2001). The Philosophy of Carl G. Hempel: Studies in Science, Explanation, and Rationality. Oxford University Press.
    Editor James Fetzer presents an analytical and historical introduction and a comprehensive bibliography together with selections of many of Carl G. Hempel's most important studies to give students and scholars an ideal opportunity to appreciate the enduring contributions of one of the most influential philosophers of science of the 20th century.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  46. Paul Gottfried (1990). Carl Schmitt: Politics and Theory. Greenwood Press.
  47.  19
    Lothar Schäfer (2006). A Response to Carl Helrich: The Limitations and Promise of Quantum Theory. Zygon 41 (3):583-591.
  48.  50
    Celina Maria Bragagnolo (2011). Secularization, History, and Political Theology: The Hans Blumenberg and Carl Schmitt Debate. Journal of the Philosophy of History 5 (1):84-104.
    Considering the enormous outpouring of scholarly work on Schmitt over the last two decades, the absence of an adequate treatment in English of Schmitt's concept of history and the problem of secularization is quite surprising. After all, it is Schmitt himself who claims that “all human beings who plan and attempt to unite the masses behind their plans engage in some form of philosophy of history,” such that the attempt to make sense of Schmitt's program remains incomplete without a serious (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  2
    Afschin Gandjour & Karl Wilhelm Lauterbach (2003). Inductive Reasoning in Medicine: Lessons From Carl Gustav Hempel's 'Inductive‐Statistical' Model. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 9 (2):161-169.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  8
    Ramón Campderrich Bravo (2009). ¿ Derecho internacional O Guerra imperial? Hans Kelsen Y Carl Schmitt Ante la pacificación de las relaciones interestatales Por medio Del derecho. Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez 43:19 - 38.
    Th e mai n idea s o f Han s K else n an d Car l Schmit t abou t w a r an d peac e i n inte r national relation s are , i n thi s a r ticle , unfolde d sta r tin g fro m th e ide a o f ‘juridica l paci f ism’ . Their usefulnes s fo r th e contempora r y debat e o n “humanitaria (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000