1.  3
    Zsuzsanna Chappell (2011). Justifying Deliberative Democracy: Are Two Heads Always Wiser Than One? Contemporary Political Theory 10 (1):78-101.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  50
    Zsuzsanna Chappell (2008). Rational Choice and Democratic Deliberation: A Theory of Discourse Failure, by Guido Pincione and Fernando R. Tesón, 2006, XI + 258 Pages. [REVIEW] Economics and Philosophy 24 (1):105-111.
  3.  11
    Zsuzsanna Chappell (2011). Justifying Deliberative Democracy: Are Two Heads Always Wiser Than One|[Quest]|. Contemporary Political Theory 10 (1):78.
    Democracy is usually justified either on intrinsic or instrumental, particularly epistemic, grounds. Intrinsic justifications stress the values inherent in the democratic process itself, whereas epistemic ones stress that it results in good outcomes. This article examines whether epistemic justifications for deliberative democracy are superior to intrinsic ones. The Condorcet jury theorem is the most common epistemic justification of democracy. I argue that it is not appropriate for deliberative democracy. Yet deliberative democrats often explicitly state that the process will favour the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography