Search results for 'agent causation' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Ned Markosian (2012). Agent Causation as the Solution to All the Compatibilist's Problems. Philosophical Studies 157 (3):383 - 398.score: 90.0
    In a recent paper I argued that agent causation theorists should be compatibilists. In this paper, I argue that compatibilists should be agent causation theorists. I consider six of the main problems facing compatibilism: (i) the powerful intuition that one can't be responsible for actions that were somehow determined before one was born; (ii) Peter van Inwagen's modal argument, involving the inference rule (β); (iii) the objection to compatibilism that is based on claiming that the ability (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ishtiyaque Haji (2004). Active Control, Agent-Causation and Free Action. Philosophical Explorations 7 (2):131-148.score: 90.0
    Key elements of Randolph Clarke's libertarian account of freedom that requires both agent-causation and non-deterministic event-causation in the production of free action is assessed with an eye toward determining whether agent-causal accounts can accommodate the truth of judgments of moral obligation.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Ned Markosian (1999). A Compatibilist Version of the Theory of Agent Causation. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (3):257-277.score: 90.0
    The problem of freedom and determinism has vexed philosophers for several millennia, and continues to be a topic of lively debate today. One of the proposed solutions to the problem that has received a great deal of attention is the Theory of Agent Causation. While the theory has enjoyed its share of advocates, and perhaps more than its share of critics, the theory’s advocates and critics have always agreed on one thing: the Theory of Agent Causation (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Manuel Dries (2013). The Feeling of Doing – Nietzsche on Agent Causation. Nietzscheforschung 20 (1).score: 90.0
    This article examines Nietzsche’s analysis of the phenomenology of agent causation. Sense of agent causation, our sense of self-efficacy, is tenacious because it originates, according to Nietzsche’s hypothesis, in the embodied and situated experience of effort in overcoming resistances. It arises at the level of the organism and is sustained by higher-order cognitive functions. Based on this hypothesis, Nietzsche regards the sense of self as emerging from a homeostatic system of drives and affects that unify such (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Daniel von Wachter (2003). Agent Causation Before and After the Ontological Turn. In Edmund Runggaldier, Christian Kanzian & Josef Quitterer (eds.), Persons: An Interdisciplinary Approach. öbvhpt.score: 90.0
    Chisholm's theory of agent causation is criticised. An alternative theory of agent causation is proposed.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Neil Levy (forthcoming). Luck and Agent-Causation: A Response to Franklin. Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-6.score: 78.0
    Christopher Franklin argues that the hard luck view, which I have recently defended, is misnamed: the arguments turn on absence of control and not on luck. He also argues that my objections to agent-causal libertarianism depend on a demand, for a contrastive explanation that guarantees the choice the agent makes, which would be question-begging in the dialectical context. In response to the first objection, I argue that though Franklin may be right that it is absence of control that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. David Widerker (2005). Agent-Causation and Control. Faith and Philosophy 22 (1):87-98.score: 75.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ralph D. Ellis (1983). Agent Causation, Chance, and Determinism. Philosophical Inquiry 5 (1):29-42.score: 75.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. E. J. Lowe (2001). Event Causation and Agent Causation. Grazer Philosophische Studien 61 (1):1-20.score: 75.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Stuart Silvers (2003). Agent Causation, Functional Explanation, and Epiphenomenal Engines: Can Conscious Mental Events Be Causally Efficacious? Journal of Mind and Behavior 24 (2):197-228.score: 75.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Timothy O'Connor (1995). Agent Causation. In , Agents, Causes, and Events: Essays on Indeterminism and Free Will. Oxford University Press. 61-79.score: 61.0
    In what follows, I will contend that the commonsense view of ourselves as fundamental causal agents - for which some have used the term “unmoved movers" but which I think might more accurately be expressed as “not wholly moved movers” - is theoretically understandable, internally consistent, and consistent with what we have thus far come to know about the nature and workings of the natural world. In the section that follows, I try to show how the concept of ‘agent (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Chris Tucker (2007). Agent Causation and the Alleged Impossibility of Rational Free Action. Erkenntnis 67 (1):17 - 27.score: 60.0
    Galen Strawson has claimed that “the impossibility of free will and ultimate moral responsibility can be proved with complete certainty.” Strawson, I take it, thinks that this conclusion can be established by one argument which he has developed. In this argument, he claims that rational free actions would require an infinite regress of rational choices, which is, of course, impossible for human beings. In my paper, I argue that agent causation theorists need not be worried by Strawson’s argument. (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Andrei A. Buckareff (1999). Can Agent-Causation Be Rendered Intelligible?: An Essay on the Etiology of Free Action. Dissertation, Texas A&M Universityscore: 60.0
    The doctrine of agent-causation has been suggested by many interested in defending libertarian theories of free action to provide the conceptual apparatus necessary to make the notion of incompatibility freedom intelligible. In the present essay the conceptual viability of the doctrine of agent-causation will be assessed. It will be argued that agent-causation is, insofar as it is irreducible to event-causation, mysterious at best, totally unintelligible at worst. First, the arguments for agent-causation (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. B. P. Dauenhauer (2013). Ricoeur and Agent Causation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (6):523-537.score: 60.0
    It is common today to find in philosophical and scientific works the idea of agent causation dismissed as unintelligible. This article is meant to challenge that view. It argues that the conception of agent causation that Paul Ricoeur has defended is by no means unintelligible. Indeed there are compelling, even if not definitive, reasons for acknowledging the existence of such causation. The point of departure for this argument is Ricoeur’s reflection on the discursive character of (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. John Lemos (2006). Flanagan and Cartesian Free Will: A Defense of Agent Causation. Disputatio 2 (21):1 - 22.score: 60.0
    In a recent book, The Problem of the Soul, Owen Flanagan discusses the Cartesian, or agent causation, view of free will. According to this view, when a person acts of his own free will his action is not caused by antecedent events but is caused by the agent himself, and in acting the agent acts as an uncaused cause. Flanagan argues at length that this view is false. In this article, I defend the agent (...) view against Flanagan�s criticisms and I go on to critically address his own �neo-compatibilist� alternative to the agent causation view. In doing so, I hope to exhibit some common misconceptions about the nature of the agent causation view and to show that this is a view that deserves more serious consideration. (shrink)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Markus E. Schlosser (2008). Agent-Causation and Agential Control. Philosophical Explorations 11 (1):3-21.score: 57.0
    According to what I call the reductive standard-causal theory of agency, the exercise of an agent's power to act can be reduced to the causal efficacy of agent-involving mental states and events. According to a non-reductive agent-causal theory, an agent's power to act is irreducible and primitive. Agent-causal theories have been dismissed on the ground that they presuppose a very contentious notion of causation, namely substance-causation. In this paper I will assume, with the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Meghan Griffith (2007). Freedom and Trying: Understanding Agent-Causal Exertions. [REVIEW] Acta Analytica 22 (1):16-28.score: 54.0
    In this paper, I argue that trying is the locus of freedom and moral responsibility. Thus, any plausible view of free and responsible action must accommodate and account for free tryings. I then consider a version of agent causation whereby the agent directly causes her tryings. On this view, the agent is afforded direct control over her efforts and there is no need to posit—as other agent-causal theorists do—an uncaused event. I discuss the potential advantages (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Eric LaRock (2013). Aristotle and Agent-Directed Neuroplasticity. International Philosophical Quarterly 53 (4):385-408.score: 54.0
    I propose an Aristotelian approach to agent causation that is consistent with the hypothesis of strong emergence. This approach motivates a wider ontology than materialism by maintaining (1) that the agent is generated by the brain without being reducible to it on grounds of the unity of experience and (2) that the agent possesses (formal) causal power to affect (i.e., mold, sculpt, or organize) the brain on grounds of agent-directed neuroplasticity. After providing recent empirical evidence (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Randolph Clarke (2005). Agent Causation and the Problem of Luck. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (3):408-421.score: 51.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Robert F. Allen, Agent Causation and Ultimate Responsibility.score: 48.0
    Positions taken in the current debate over free will can be seen as responses to the following conditional: If every action is caused solely by another event and a cause necessitates its effect, then there is no action to which there is an alternative. The Libertarian, who believes that alternatives are a requirement of free will, responds by denying the right conjunct of C’s antecedent, maintaining that some actions are caused, either mediately or immediately, by events whose effects could be (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Terry Horgan (2007). Mental Causation and the Agent-Exclusion Problem. Erkenntnis 67 (2):183 - 200.score: 48.0
    The hypothesis of the mental state-causation of behavior (the MSC hypothesis) asserts that the behaviors we classify as actions are caused by certain mental states. A principal reason often given for trying to secure the truth of the MSC hypothesis is that doing so is allegedly required to vindicate our belief in our own agency. I argue that the project of vindicating agency needs to be seriously reconceived, as does the relation between this project and the MSC hypothesis. Vindication (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Christopher Evan Franklin (2013). Agent-Causation, Explanation, and Akrasia: A Reply to Levy's Hard Luck. [REVIEW] Criminal Law and Philosophy:1-18.score: 48.0
    I offer a brief review of, and critical response to, Neil Levy’s fascinating recent book Hard Luck, where he argues that no one is ever free or morally responsible not because of determinism or indeterminism, but because of luck. Two of Levy’s central arguments in defending his free will nihilism concern the nature and role of explanation in a theory of moral responsibility and the nature of akrasia. With respect to explanation, Levy argues that an adequate theory of moral responsibility (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Jonathan D. Jacobs & Timothy O'Connor (2013). Agent Causation in a Neo-Aristotelian Metaphysics. In Sophie C. Gibb & Rögnvaldur Ingthorsson (eds.), Mental Causation and Ontology. Oxford University Press.score: 48.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Rebekah L. H. Rice (2011). Agent Causation and Acting for Reasons. American Philosophical Quarterly 48 (4):333-346.score: 48.0
    The Agent-Causal Theory of Action claims that an event counts as an action when, and only when, it is caused by an agent. The central difference between the Causal Theory of Action (CTA) and the Agent-Causal view comes down to a disagreement about what sort of item (or items) occupies the left-hand position in the causal relation. For CTA, the left-hand position is occupied by mental items within the agent, typically construed in terms of mental events (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Stefaan E. Cuypers (1998). Robust Activity, Event-Causation, and Agent-Causation. In. In J. A. M. Bransen & S. E. Cuypers (eds.), Human Action, Deliberation and Causation. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 271--294.score: 48.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. John D. Bishop (1983). Agent-Causation. Mind 92 (January):61-79.score: 45.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Susanne Bobzien (ed.) (2011). Afterword to The Philosophy of Aristotle. Signet.score: 45.0
    ABSTRACT: This is a little piece directed at the newcomer to Aristotle, making some general remarks about reading Aristotle at the beginning and end, with sandwiched in between, a brief and much simplified discussion of some common misunderstandings of Aristotle's philosophy, concerning spontaneity, causal indeterminism, freedom-to-do-otherwise, free choice, agent causation, logical determinism, teleological determinism, artistic creativity and freedom (eleutheria).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Derk Pereboom (2004). Is Our Conception of Agent-Causation Coherent? Philosophical Topics 32 (1/2):275-286.score: 45.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Timothy O'Connor (1996). Why Agent Causation? Philosophical Topics 24 (2):143-58.score: 45.0
    I Introduction The question of this paper is, what would it be to act with freedom of the will? What kind of control is inchoately in view when we speak, pretheoretically, of being ‘self- determining’ beings, of ‘freely making choices in view of consciously considered reasons’ (pro and con) - of its being ‘up to us’ how we shall act? My question here is not whether we have (or have any reason to think we have) such freedom, or what is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. G. E. Zuriff (2004). Conscious Will and Agent Causation. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (5):678-679.score: 45.0
    Wegner (2002) fails to (1) distinguish conscious will and voluntariness; (2) account for everyday willed acts; and (3) individuate thoughts and acts. Wegner incorrectly implies that (4) we experience acts as willed only when they are caused by unwilled thoughts; (5) thoughts are never true causes of actions; and (6) we experience ourselves as first performing mental acts which then cause our intentional actions.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Laurence BonJour (1976). Deeterminism, Libertarianism, and Agent Causation. Southern Journal of Philosophy 14 (2):145-56.score: 45.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Randolph Clarke (1996). Agent Causation and Event Causation in the Production of Free Action. Philosophical Topics 24 (2):19-48.score: 45.0
  33. William L. Rowe (1991). Responsibility, Agent-Causation, and Freedom: An Eighteenth-Century View. Ethics 101 (2):237-257.score: 45.0
  34. Xiangdong Xu (2011). Thomas Reid on Active Power and Free Agency. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):369-389.score: 45.0
    The paper argues that it is a mistake to interpret Thomas Reid as holding a libertarian notion of freedom, and to make use of Reid to argue in support of a libertarian position. More precisely, this paper shows that Reid’s theory of agent-causation may not be what these philosophers take it to be, once such crucial notions as agent-causation and active power in Reid’s theory of free agency have been fully explicated. Reid is more committed to (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Michael Bergmann (2003). Agent Causation and Responsibility. Faith and Philosophy 20 (2):229-235.score: 45.0
  36. John Martin Fischer (2003). Responsibility and Agent-Causation. In David Widerker & Michael McKenna (eds.), Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities. Ashgate.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. William L. Rowe (2003). Alternate Possibilities and Reid's Theory of Agent-Causation. In David Widerker & Michael McKenna (eds.), Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities. Ashgate. 219.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Jack Martin (2012). Agent Causation and Compatibilism Reconsidered The Evolutionary and Developmental Emergence of Self-Determining Persons. Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (5-6):5-6.score: 45.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Paul Van Rooy (2013). Review of James Swindal, Action and Existence: A Case for Agent Causation. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Social Criticism 39 (7):717-722.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Daniel von Wachter (2003). Agent Causation: Before and After the Ontological Turn. In C. Kanzian, J. Quitterer & E. Runggaldier (eds.), Persons: An Interdisciplinary Approach. öBvhpt. 276-278.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. R. D. Ellis (1983). Agent Causation, Chance, and Determinism. Philosophical Inquiry 5 (1):29-42.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. John Lemos (2006). Critical Notice Flanagan and Cartesian Free Will: A Defense of Agent Causation. Disputatio 2 (21).score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. E. J. Lowe (2006). Agent Causation. In D. M. Borchert (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy (2nd Edition). Macmillan.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. William Rowe (2003). Responsibility and Agent-Causation. In David Widerker & Michael McKenna (eds.), Moral Responsibility and Alternative Possibilities: Essays on the Importance of Alternative Possibilities. Ashgate. 235.score: 45.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Sigrid Sarnoff (1985). A Bergsonian View of Agent-Causation. International Philosophical Quarterly 25 (2):185-196.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. James Swindal (2012). Action and Existence: A Case for Agent Causation. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 45.0
    Introduction : action, thought, pragmatism -- Neo-pragmatism and its critics -- Methodology : reconstructive dialectics -- A history of action theory -- Defining actions -- The explanation of action -- A material explication of agency -- Agency and existence.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Robert Reuter (1993). The Radical Agent: A Deweyan Theory of Causation. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 29 (2):239 - 257.score: 36.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Eric Marcus (2012). Rational Causation. Harvard University Press.score: 36.0
1 — 50 / 1000