Search results for 'analysis of knowledge' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Jerome Gellman (2010). A New Gettier-Type Refutation of Nozick´s Analysis of Knowledge. Principia 8 (2):279-283.score: 150.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. A. Ule (2008). Circles of Analysis: Essays on Logic, Mind and Knowledge. Lit.score: 135.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Masaharu Mizumoto (2011). A Theory of Knowledge and Belief Change - Formal and Experimental Perspectives. Hokkaido University Press.score: 132.0
    This work explores the conceptual and empirical issues of the concept of knowledge and its relation to the pattern of our belief change, from formal and experimental perspectives. Part I gives an analysis of knowledge (called Sustainability) that is formally represented and naturalistically plausible at the same time, which is claimed to be a synthesized view of knowledge, covering not only empirical knowledge, but also knowledge of future, practical knowledge, mathematical knowledge, (...) of general facts. Part II tries to formalize the natural pattern of belief change assumed in Sustainability in terms of a specific formal theory of belief change, after carefully examining the notions of belief, belief change, and Information, from which the cognitive function F in Chapter 3 is actually constructed, which is later implemented by a computer program and its behavior against random input is demonstrated. In Part III we proceed to examine the analysis empirically. In particular, we will investigate Sustainability from the developmental point of view. We first justify experimental approach in philosophy as a legitimate method of philosophical investigation, and then developmental approach in particular. The specific proposal of experiment here is what we call the Gettier Task, an analogue of the famous false-belief task in developmental psychology, which has been much discussed in philosophy of mind. Two versions of the Gettier Task were tested on children aged from 6 to 12, and we claim that the data obtained empirically supports our analysis of knowledge, or Sustainability. (shrink)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Mark McEvoy (2009). The Lottery Puzzle and Pritchard's Safety Analysis of Knowledge. Journal of Philosophical Research 34:7-20.score: 129.0
    Duncan Pritchard's version of the safety analysis of knowledge has it that for all contingent propositions, p, S knows that p iff S believes that p, p is true, and (the “safety principle”) in most nearby worlds in which S forms his belief in the same way as in the actual world, S believes that p only if p is true. Among the other virtues claimed by Pritchard for this view is its supposed ability to solve a version (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Robin Pope & Reinhard Selten (2010/2011). ‘Risk in a Simple Temporal Framework for Expected Utility Theory and for SKAT, the Stages of Knowledge Ahead Theory’, Risk and Decision Analysis, 2(1), 5-32. Selten Co-Author. Risk and Decision Analysis 2 (1).score: 125.0
    The paper re-expresses arguments against the normative validity of expected utility theory in Robin Pope (1983, 1991a, 1991b, 1985, 1995, 2000, 2001, 2005, 2006, 2007). These concern the neglect of the evolving stages of knowledge ahead (stages of what the future will bring). Such evolution is fundamental to an experience of risk, yet not consistently incorporated even in axiomatised temporal versions of expected utility. Its neglect entails a disregard of emotional and financial effects on well-being before a particular risk (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Luís M. Augusto (2011). Putting the horse before the cart: A pragmatist analysis of knowledge. Trans/Form/Ação 34 (2):135-152.score: 120.0
    The de! nition of knowledge as justfied true belief is the best we presently have. However, the canonical tripartite analysis of knowledge does not do justice to it due to a Platonic conception of a priori truth that puts the cart before the horse. Within a pragmatic approach, I argue that by doing away with a priori truth, namely by submitting truth to justi! cation, and by accordingly altering the canonical analysis of knowledge, this is (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Frank Hindriks (2007). The Status of the Knowledge Account of Assertion. Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (3):393-406.score: 119.0
    According to the increasingly popular knowledge account, assertion is governed by the rule that speech acts of that kind require knowledge of their content. Timothy Williamson has argued that this knowledge rule is the constitutive rule of assertion. It is argued here that it is not the constitutive rule of assertion in any sense of the term, as it governs only some assertions rather than all of them. A (qualified) knowledge rule can in fact be derived (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Gunter W. Remmling (1975). The Sociology of Karl Mannheim: With a Bibliographical Guide to the Sociology of Knowledge, Ideological Analysis, and Social Planning. Routledge & K. Paul.score: 118.0
    The significance and development of Mannheim's sociology Ancient data such as the Code of Hammurabi, the Old Testament, the Confucian Classics, ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. León Olivé (1993). Knowledge, Society, and Reality: Problems of the Social Analysis of Knowledge and of Scientific Realism. Rodopi.score: 117.0
    INTRODUCTION Human knowledge has two central aspects that demand attention: On one hand, it is a social construct and on the other it aspires to be ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Ben Bronner (2012). Problems with the Dispositional Tracking Theory of Knowledge. Logos and Episteme 3 (3):505-507.score: 116.0
    Rachael Briggs and Daniel Nolan attempt to improve on Nozick’s tracking theory of knowledge by providing a modified, dispositional tracking theory. The dispositional theory, however, faces more problems than those previously noted by John Turri. First, it is not simply that satisfaction of the theory’s conditions is unnecessary for knowledge – it is insufficient as well. Second, in one important respect, the dispositional theory is a step backwards relative to the original tracking theory: the original but not the (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. C. I. Lewis (1946). An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. Open Court.score: 114.0
    We are republishing these classic works in affordable, high quality, modern editions, using the original text and artwork.
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. John B. Gatewood (2012). Cultural Models, Consensus Analysis, and the Social Organization of Knowledge. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (3):362-371.score: 114.0
    The introductory essay to this collection correctly observes that there are many “challenges for rapprochement” between anthropology and (the rest of) cognitive science. Still, the possibilities of fruitful interchanges provide some hope for the parties getting back together, at least on an intermittent basis. This response offers some views concerning the “incompatibility” of psychology and anthropology, reviews why cognitive anthropology drifted away from cognitive science, and notes two areas of contemporary interest within cognitive anthropology that may lead to a re-engagement.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Anneli Sarvimäki (1988). Knowledge in Interactive Practice Disciplines: An Analysis of Knowledge in Education and Health Care. Dept. Of Education, University of Helsinki.score: 114.0
  14. Ledger Wood (1940). The Analysis of Knowledge. London, G. Allen & Unwin Ltd..score: 114.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. M. S. Burgin (1992). The Structure-Nominative Analysis of Theoretical Knowledge: Ideas, Results and Perspectives. Institute of Philosophy, Academy of Sciences of Ukraine.score: 111.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Stefano Fiori (2009). Hayek's Theory on Complexity and Knowledge: Dichotomies, Levels of Analysis, and Bounded Rationality. Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (3):265-285.score: 111.0
    Hayek maintains that models of complexity must consider two closely interrelated factors: the large number of variables and the connections among them. These two conditions, which define complex phenomena, exhibit a different logical dimension. The former (the ?large number of variables?) describes complexity in quantitative (numerical) terms; the latter provides a view of complex phenomena in logical-relational terms, and it is evoked to explain the emergent properties of the whole. Despite the close relation between these concepts, the first notion essentially (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Xiaogang Ke (2006). A Phenomenological Reading of Hegel's Concept of History of Philosophy: An Analysis of “the Gallery of Opinions”, “the Gallery of Knowledge” and “the Gallery of Dresden”. [REVIEW] Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):51-59.score: 110.0
    From a phenomenological perspective of game-space and horizon, this paper tries to make a deconstructive reading of Hegel's "two galleries", namely, "the gallery of opinions" and "the gallery of knowledge", which are mentioned in the introduction of Hegel's Lectures on the History of Philosophy. The reading shows that the Game-space or the ab-gruendiger Grund of the Hegelian concept of philosophical history lies in an originally differencing space that is keeping in absence, which is called by Edmund Husserl and Jacques (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Julie Ingram (2008). Agronomist–Farmer Knowledge Encounters: An Analysis of Knowledge Exchange in the Context of Best Management Practices in England. [REVIEW] Agriculture and Human Values 25 (3):405-418.score: 110.0
    This paper explores how knowledge is exchanged between agricultural advisors and farmers in the context of sustainable farming practices in England. Specifically the paper examines the nature of the knowledge exchange at the encounters between one group of advisors, agronomists, and farmers. The promotion of best management practices, which are central to the implementation of sustainable agricultural policies in England, provide the empirical context for this study. The paper uses the notion of expert and facilitative approaches as a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Markus F. Peschl & Chris Stary (1998). The Role of Cognitive Modeling for User Interface Design Representations: An Epistemological Analysis of Knowledge Engineering in the Context of Human-Computer Interaction. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 8 (2):203-236.score: 108.0
    In this paper we review some problems with traditional approaches for acquiring and representing knowledge in the context of developing user interfaces. Methodological implications for knowledge engineering and for human-computer interaction are studied. It turns out that in order to achieve the goal of developing human-oriented (in contrast to technology-oriented) human-computer interfaces developers have to develop sound knowledge of the structure and the representational dynamics of the cognitive system which is interacting with the computer.We show that in (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. R. I. Ingalalli (1992). Knowledge of Action: Logico-Epistemological Analysis. Sri Satguru Publications.score: 105.0
  21. Henk Zandvoort (2005). Knowledge, Risk, and Liability. Analysis of a Discussion Continuing Within Science and Technology. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 84 (1):469-498.score: 102.0
    In this paper I present my reflections on the ethics of science as described by Merton and as actually practiced by scientists and technologists. This ethics was the subject of Kuipers' paper "'Default norms' in Research Ethics" (Kuipers 2001). There is an implicit assumption in this ethics, notably in Merton's norm of communism, that knowledge is always, or unconditionally good, and hence that scientific research, and the dissemination of its results, is unconditionally good. I will give here reasons why (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Mohammadreza Zolfagharian, Reza Akbari & Hamidreza Fartookzadeh (forthcoming). Theory of Knowledge in System Dynamics Models. Foundations of Science:1-19.score: 102.0
    Having entered into the problem structuring methods, system dynamics (SD) is an approach, among systems’ methodologies, which claims to recognize the main structures of socio-economic behaviors. However, the concern for building or discovering strong philosophical underpinnings of SD, undoubtedly playing an important role in the modeling process, is a long-standing issue, in a way that there is a considerable debate about the assumptions or the philosophical foundations of it. In this paper, with a new perspective, we have explored theory of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Murat Bac & Nurbay Irmak (2011). Knowing Wrongly: An Obvious Oxymoron, or a Threat for the Alleged Universality of Epistemological Analyses? Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):305-321.score: 101.0
    The traditional tripartite and tetrapartite analyses describe the conceptual components of propositional knowledge from a universal epistemic point of view. According to the classical analysis, since truth is a necessary condition of knowledge, it does not make sense to talk about “false knowledge” or “knowing wrongly.” There are nonetheless some natural languages in which speakers ordinarily make statements about a person’s knowing a given subject matter wrongly. In this paper, we first provide a brief analysis (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Michel Foucault (1972/2002). Archaeology of Knowledge. Routledge.score: 99.0
    "Next to Sartre's Search for a Method and in direct opposition to it, Foucault's work is the most noteworthy effort at a theory of history in the last 50 years." -- Library Journal.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Jérôme Dokic & Paul Égré (2009). Margin for Error and the Transparency of Knowledge. Synthese 166 (1):1 - 20.score: 99.0
    In chapter 5 of Knowledge and its Limits, T. Williamson formulates an argument against the principle (KK) of epistemic transparency, or luminosity of knowledge, namely “that if one knows something, then one knows that one knows it”. Williamson’s argument proceeds by reductio: from the description of a situation of approximate knowledge, he shows that a contradiction can be derived on the basis of principle (KK) and additional epistemic principles that he claims are better grounded. One of them (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Karin Knorr-Cetina (1988). The Internal Environment of Knowledge Claims: One Aspect of the Knowledge-Society Connection. [REVIEW] Argumentation 2 (3):369-389.score: 99.0
    In the sociology of knowledge, the relationship between society and knowledge —or rather what separates them — remains an unsolved problem. A critical analysis of various solutions that we must look for to this problem suggests the plausibility of a passage between social groups, styles of argumentation and objects of knowledge. An empirical model of “decision displacements” is proposed on the basis of a corpus of texts and of observations derived from concrete analysis of a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Martti Kuokkanen & Timo Tuomivaara (1994). The Threshold Model of Scientific Change and the Continuity of Scientific Knowledge. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 25 (2):327 - 335.score: 96.0
    The continuity thesis of the Poznań school threshold model of the growth of scientific knowledge is considered in the light of the example of Van der Waals' and Boyle-Mariotte's laws. It is argued - using both traditional logical means and the structuralist reconstruction of the example - that the continuity thesis does not hold. A distinction between 'a historical and a systematic point of view' is introduced and it is argued that the continuity thesis of the threshold model presupposes (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Charlotte Bax, Rune Elvik & Knut Veisten (2009). Knowledge Utilisation in Road Safety Policy: Barriers to the Use of Knowledge From Economic Analysis. Knowledge, Technology and Policy 22 (4):275-285.score: 96.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Carl de Wet, Nick Bradley & Paul Bowie (2011). Significant Event Analysis: A Comparative Study of Knowledge, Process and Attitudes in Primary Care. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 17 (6):1207-1215.score: 96.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Andrew Miles (2007). Science: A Limited Source of Knowledge and Authority in the Care of Patients*. A Review and Analysis Of: 'How Doctors Think. Clinical Judgement and the Practice of Medicine.'Montgomery, K. [REVIEW] Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 13 (4):545-563.score: 96.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Ke Xiaogang (2006). A Phenomenological Reading of Hegel's Concept of History of Philosophy: An Analysis of “The Gallery of Opinions”, “The Gallery of Knowledge” and “The Gallery of Dresden”. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 1 (1):51-59.score: 96.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Paul Guyer (1987). Kant and the Claims of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press.score: 95.0
    This book offers a radically new account of the development and structure of the central arguments of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: the defense of the objective validity of such categories as substance, causation, and independent existence. Paul Guyer makes far more extensive use than any other commentator of historical materials from the years leading up to the publication of the Critique and surrounding its revision, and he shows that the work which has come down to us is the result (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Michael Gibbons (ed.) (1994). The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. Sage Publications.score: 95.0
    As we approach the end of the twentieth century, the ways in which knowledge--scientific, social, and cultural--is produced are undergoing fundamental changes. In The New Production of Knowledge, a distinguished group of authors analyze these changes as marking the transition from established institutions, disciplines, practices, and policies to a new mode of knowledge production. Identifying such elements as reflexivity, transdisciplinarity, and heterogeneity within this new mode, the authors consider their impact and interplay with the role of (...) in social relations. While the knowledge produced by research and development in science and technology is accorded central focus, the authors also outline the changing dimensions of social scientific and humanities knowledge and the relations between the production of knowledge and its dissemination through education. Placing science policy and scientific knowledge within the broader context of contemporary society, this book will be essential reading for all those concerned with the changing nature of knowledge, with the social study of science, with educational systems, and with the correlation between research and development and social, economic, and technological development. "Thought-provoking in its identification of issues that are global in scope; for policy makers in higher education, government, or the commercial sector." --Choice "By their insightful identification of the recent social transformation of knowledge production, the authors have been able to assert new imperatives for policy institutions. The lessons of the book are deep." --Alexis Jacquemin, Universite Catholique de Louvain and Advisor, Foreign Studies Unit, European Commission "Should we celebrate the emergence of a 'post-academic' mode of postmodern knowledge production of the post-industrial society of the 21st Century? Or should we turn away from it with increasing fear and loathing as we also uncover its contradictions. A generation of enthusiasts and/or critics will be indebted to the team of authors for exposing so forcefully the intimate connections between all the cognitive, educational, organizational, and commercial changes that are together revolutionizing the sciences, the technologies, and the humanities. This book will surely spark off a vigorous and fruitful debate about the meaning and purpose of knowledge in our culture." --Professor John Ziman, (Wendy, Janey at Ltd. is going to provide affiliation. Contact if you don't hear from her.) "Jointly authored by a team of distinguished scholars spanning a number of disciplines, The New Production of Knowledge maps the changes in the mode of knowledge production and the global impact of such transformations. . . . The authors succeed . . . at sketching out, in very large strokes, the emerging trends in knowledge production and their implications for future society. The macro focus of the book is a welcome change from the micro obsession of most sociologists of science, who have pretty much deconstructed institutions and even scientific knowledge out of existence." --Contemporary Sociology "This book is a timely contribution to current discussion on the breakdown of and need to renegotiate the social contract between science and society that Vannevar Bush and likeminded architects of science policy constructed immediately after World War II. It goes far beyond the usual scattering of fragmentary insights into changing institutional landscapes, cognitive structures, or quality control mechanisms of present day science, and their linkages with society at large. Tapping a wide variety of sources, the authors provide a coherent picture of important new characteristics that, taken altogether, fundamentally challenge our traditional notions of what academic research is all about. This well-founded analysis of the social redistribution of knowledge and its associated power patterns helps articulate what otherwise tends to remain an--albeit widespread--intuition. Unless they adapt to the new situation, universities in the future will find the centers of gravity of knowledge production moving even further beyond their ken. Knowledge of the social and cognitive dynamics of science in research is much needed as a basis of science and technology policymaking. The New Production of Knowledge does a lot to fill this gap. Another unique feature is its discussion of the humanities, which are usually left out in works coming out of the social studies of science." --Aant Elzinga, University od Goteborg. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Giorgio Marchetti (2000). Observation Levels and Units of Time: A Critical Analysis of the Main Assumption of the Theory of the Artificial. [REVIEW] AI and Society 14 (3-4):331-347.score: 95.0
    Negrotti's theory of the artificial is based on the fundamental assumption that the human being cannot select more than one observation level per unit of time. Since this assumption has important consequences for the theory of knowledge — knowledge cannot be synthesised but only further differentiated — its plausibility is tested against two aspects that characterise any theory of knowledge: knowledge production and knowledge application. The way in which the human being produces and applies (...) is analysed, and a model of mind based on the transitoriness of its elements is proposed. The analysis confirms that only one observation level can be selected per unit of time. (shrink)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Elizabeth Ramsden Eames (1969). Bertrand Russell's Theory of Knowledge. London, Allen & Unwin.score: 95.0
    When future generations come to analyze and survey twentieth-century philosophy as a whole, Bertrand Russell’s logic and theory of knowledge is assured a place of prime importance. Yet until this book was first published in 1969 no comprehensive treatment of his epistemology had appeared. Commentators on twentieth-century philosophy at the time assumed that Russell’s important contributions to the theory of knowledge were made before 1921. This book challenges that assumption and draws attention to features of Russell’s later work (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Richard Fardon (ed.) (1995). Counterworks: Managing the Diversity of Knowledge. Routledge.score: 94.0
    Globalization is often described as the spread of western culture to other parts of the world. How accurate is the depiction of "cultural" flow? In Counterworks , ten anthropologists examine the ways in which global processes have affected particular localities where they have carried out research. They challenge the validity of anthropological concepts of culture in the light of the pervasive connections which exist between local and global factors everywhere. Rather than assuming that the world is culturally diverse, this book (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Matthias Steup, The Analysis of Knowledge. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 93.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Ernest Sosa (1964). The Analysis of 'Knowledge That P'. Analysis 25 (1):1 - 8.score: 93.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Michael Williams (1978). Inference, Justification, and the Analysis of Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 75 (5):249-263.score: 93.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Virgil G. Hinshaw Jr (1949). Basic Propositions in Lewis's Analysis of Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 46 (7):176-184.score: 93.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Joseph Margolis (1973). Alternative Strategies for the Analysis of Knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):461 - 469.score: 93.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Oleg Zhuravlev, Daneil Kondov & Natalia Savel’eva (2009). The European University at St. Petersburg: A Case Study in Sociology of Post-Soviet Knowledge. Studies in East European Thought 61 (4):291 - 308.score: 93.0
    The article presents results of an ongoing study of centers of intellectual innovations in post-Soviet Russia. Using the European University at St. Petersburg as the main object of their analysis, the authors demonstrate how new models of academic careers, which became available in the 1980s and 1990s, were eventually institutionalized as new models of knowledge production and educational practices. Supported by American foundations, this private university had to invent a new institutional structure and to position itself within the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Earl B. Conee (1980). The Analysis of Knowledge in the Second Edition of Theory of Knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):295 - 300.score: 93.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Andrew Miles, Michael Loughlin & Andreas Polychronis (2008). Evidence‐Based Healthcare, Clinical Knowledge and the Rise of Personalised Medicine. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 14 (5):621-649.score: 93.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Oliver A. Johnson (1972). Some Problems in the Standard Analysis of Knowledge. Southern Journal of Philosophy 10 (4):409-421.score: 93.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Carl G. Hempel (1948). Review: Clarence Irving Lewis, An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 13 (1):40-45.score: 93.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Keith Lehrer (1979). The Gettier Problem and the Analysis of Knowledge. In. In George Pappas (ed.), Justification and Knowledge. Boston: D. Reidel. 65--78.score: 93.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Rulon S. Wells (1949). An Analysis of Knowledge and Valuation. Review of Metaphysics 2 (3):99-115.score: 93.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Peter Unger (1968). An Analysis of Factual Knowledge. Journal of Philosophy 65 (6):157-170.score: 90.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Jan Helge Solbakk (2003). Use and Abuse of Empirical Knowledge in Contemporary Bioethics: A Critical Analysis of Empirical Arguments Employed in the Controversy Surrounding Stem Cell Research. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (04):384-392.score: 90.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000