Search results for 'ancient logic' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Susanne Bobzien (2006). Logic, History Of: Ancient Logic. In Donald M. Borchert (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Thomson Gale.score: 234.0
    ABSTRACT: A comprehensive introduction to ancient (western) logic from earliest times to the 6th century CE, with a focus on issues that may be of interest to contemporary logicians and covering important topics in Post-Aristotelian logic that are frequently neglected (such as Peripatetic hypothetical syllogistic, the Stoic axiomatic system of propositional logic and various later ancient developments).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Jonathan Barnes (2007/2009). Truth, Etc.: Six Lectures on Ancient Logic. Oxford University Press.score: 228.0
    Truth, etc. is a wide-ranging study of ancient logic based upon the John Locke lectures given by the eminent philosopher Jonathan Barnes in Oxford. The book presupposes no knowledge of logic and no skill in ancient languages: all ancient texts are cited in English translation; and logical symbols and logical jargon are avoided so far as possible. Anyone interested in ancient philosophy, or in logic and its history, will find much to learn and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John Corcoran (ed.) (1974). Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretations. Boston,Reidel.score: 198.0
  4. Susanne Bobzien (2006). Ancient Logic. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 186.0
    ABSTRACT: A comprehensive introduction to ancient (western) logic from earliest times to the 6th century CE, with an emphasis on topics which may be of interest to contemporary logicians. Content: 1. Pre-Aristotelian Logic 1.1 Syntax and Semantics 1.2 Argument Patterns and Valid Inference 2. Aristotle 2.1 Dialectics 2.2 Sub-sentential Classifications 2.3 Syntax and Semantics of Sentences 2.4 Non-modal Syllogistic 2.5 Modal Logic 3. The early Peripatetics: Theophrastus and Eudemus 3.1 Improvements and Modifications of Aristotle's Logic (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. John Mulhern (1974). Modern Notations and Ancient Logic. In John Corcoran (ed.), Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretations. Boston,Reidel. 71--82.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Raul Corazzon, The History of Ancient Logic in the Hellenistic Period.score: 174.0
    "General Survey. The succession of thinkers and schools. The history of ancient philosophy covers about eleven centuries, from Thales who lived during the sixth century B.C. to Boethius and Simplicius who flourished at the beginning of the sixth A.D. From the point of view of the history of formal logic this long epoch may be divided into three periods. (1) The pre-Aristotelian period, from the beginnings to the time at which Aristotle..
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Sten Ebbesen (2007). The Traditions of Ancient Logic-Cum-Grammar in the Middle Ages—What's the Problem? Vivarium 45 (s 2-3):136-152.score: 174.0
    Clashes between bits of non-homogeneous theories inherited from antiquity were an important factor in the formation of medieval theories in logic and grammar, but the traditional categories of Aristotelianism, Stoicism and Neoplatonism are not quite adequate to describe the situation. Neoplatonism is almost irrelevant in logic and grammar, while there might be reasons to introduce a new category, LAS = Late Ancient Standard, with two branches: (1) logical LAS = Aristotle + Boethius, and (2) grammatical LAS (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. John Corcoran (1972). Completeness of an Ancient Logic. Journal of Symbolic Logic 37 (4):696-702.score: 156.0
    In previous articles, it has been shown that the deductive system developed by Aristotle in his "second logic" is a natural deduction system and not an axiomatic system as previously had been thought. It was also stated that Aristotle's logic is self-sufficient in two senses: First, that it presupposed no other logical concepts, not even those of propositional logic; second, that it is (strongly) complete in the sense that every valid argument expressible in the language of the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Paolo Fait (2008). Jonathan Barnes, Truth, Etc.: Six Lectures on Ancient Logic. Rhizai. A Journal for Ancient Philosophy and Science:345-353.score: 156.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Nicholas Denyer (2008). Truth, Etc.: Six Lectures on Ancient Logic – Jonathan Barnes. Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):176–177.score: 150.0
  11. Lorenzo Corti (2011). Ancient Logic (M.) Alessandrelli, (M.) Nasti De Vincentis (Edd.) La Logica Nel Pensiero Antico. Atti Del Colloquio, Roma, 28–29 Novembre 2000. (Elenchos 52.) Pp. 295. Naples: Bibliopolis, 2009. Paper, €30. ISBN: 978-88-7088-585-9. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 61 (1):60-62.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Martin Lenz (2004). Kongreßbericht: The Traditions of Ancient Logic in the Middle Ages. The 15th European Symposium on Medieval Logic and Semantics (Trinity College, Cambridge, 1.-4. Juli 2004). [REVIEW] Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch Fur Antike Und Mittelalter 9 (1):203-208.score: 150.0
  13. J. R. Trevaskis (1958). Ancient Logic. The Classical Review 8 (3-4):246-.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Francesco Ademollo (2009). Truth, Etc.: Six Lectures on Ancient Logic. Philosophical Review 118 (4):546-551.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Czesław Lejewski (1967). Ancient Logic. In Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York, Macmillan. 4--513.score: 150.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. J. R. Trevaskis (1958). Ancient Logic Oskar Becker: Zwei Untersuckungen Zur Antiken Logik. (Klass.-Philol. Studien, 17.) Pp. 55. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 1957. Paper, DM. 6. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 8 (3-4):246-248.score: 150.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Silviu Guiasu (2011). Three Ancient Problems Solved by Using the Game Theory Logic Based on the Shapley Value. Synthese 181 (1):65 - 79.score: 144.0
    The ancient problems of bankruptcy, contested garment, and rights arbitration have generated many studies, debates, and controversy. The objective of this paper is to show that the Shapley value from game theory, measuring the power of each player in a game, may be consistently applied for getting the general one-step solution of all these three problems viewed as -person games. The decision making is based on the same tool, namely the game theory logic based on the use of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Mi-Kyoung Lee (ed.) (2014). Strategies of Argument: Essays in Ancient Ethics, Epistemology, and Logic. Oup Usa.score: 144.0
    This volume features new papers by an international group of scholars in ancient philosophy, with a particular focus on new work in ancient Greek and Roman ethics, epistemology, logic, and science.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Luca Castagnoli (2010). Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine. Cambridge University Press.score: 138.0
    Machine generated contents note: Introduction; Part I. Truth, <span class='Hi'>Falsehood</span> and Self-Refutation: 1. Preliminaries; 2. A modern approach: Mackie on the absolute self-refutation of 'nothing is true'; 3. Setting the ancient stage: Dissoi Logoi 4.6; 4. Self-refutation and dialectic: Plato; 5. Speaking to Antiphasis: Aristotle; 6. Introducing peritroph: Sextus Empiricus; 7. Augustine's turn; 8. Interim conclusions; Part II. Pragmatic, Ad Hominem and Operational Self-Refutation: 9. Epicurus against the determinist: blame and reversal; 10. Anti-sceptical dilemmas: pragmatic or ad hominem self-refutations?; (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Satis Chandra Vidyabhusana (1921/1971). A History of Indian Logic: Ancient, Mediaeval, and Modern Schools. Delhi,Motilal Banarsidass.score: 138.0
    The Conciliatory Character of Jaina Logic. In the previous pages there has been given an indication of the services rendered by the Jainas and N° Brihrna^1 H,e the Buddhists in the formation of the Mediaeval School of Indian Logic. Since the  ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Józef M. Bocheński (1951). Ancient Formal Logic. Amsterdam, North-Holland Pub. Co..score: 132.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Joseph M. Bochenski (1951). Ancient Formal Logic. Amsterdam, North-Holland Pub. Co..score: 132.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Janusz Chmielewski (2009). Language and Logic in Ancient China: Collected Papers on the Chinese Language and Logic. Pan.score: 132.0
  24. Maria Liatsi (2006). Interpretation der Antike: Die Pragmatistische Methode Historischer Forschung: Ein Kommentar Zur Abhandlung von Charles S. Peirce "on the Logic of Drawing History From Ancient Documents, Especially From Testimonies". Olms.score: 132.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Weimin Sun (2009). Chinese Logic and the Absence of Theoretical Sciences in Ancient China. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (4).score: 126.0
    In this essay, I examine the nature of Chinese logic and Chinese sciences in the history of China. I conclude that Chinese logic is essentially analogical, and that the Chinese did not have theoretical sciences. I then connect these together and explain why the Chinese failed to develop theoretical sciences, even though they enjoyed an advanced civilization and great scientific and technological innovations. This is because a deductive system of logic is necessary for the development of theoretical (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Allan Silverman (2012). Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine. By Luca Castagnoli. Ancient Philosophy 32 (2):458-461.score: 126.0
  27. Robert Feys (1953). Review: I. M. Bochenski, Ancient Formal Logic. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 18 (1):81-82.score: 126.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Angelo Montanari & Alberto Policriti (1997). Review: Peter Ohrstrom, Per F. V. Hasle, Temporal Logic. From Ancient Ideas to Artificial Intelligence. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (3):1044-1046.score: 126.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Robin Smith (2002). Ancient Philosophical Logic. In Dale Jacquette (ed.), A Companion to Philosophical Logic.score: 126.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Susanne Bobzien (1996). Logic. In Simon Hornblower & A. Spawforth (eds.), The Oxford Classical Dictionary, 3rd edition. Oxford University Press.score: 120.0
    ABSTRACT: A very brief summary presentation of western ancient logic for the non-specialized reader, from the beginnings to Boethius. For a much more detailed presentation see my "Ancient Logic" in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosopy (also on PhilPapers).
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Claus Oetke (1996). Ancient Indian Logic as a Theory of Non-Monotonic Reasoning. Journal of Indian Philosophy 24 (5):447-539.score: 120.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. J. Barnes (2012). Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine, by Luca Castagnoli. Mind 121 (482):478-485.score: 120.0
  33. Jonardon Ganeri (2003). Ancient Indian Logic as a Theory of Case-Based Reasoning. Journal of Indian Philosophy 31 (1/3):33-45.score: 120.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Mary Katrina Krizan (2011). Luca Castagnoli. Ancient Self-Refutation: The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine. Augustinian Studies 42 (2):316-319.score: 120.0
  35. Jinmei Yuan (2005). "Kinds, Lei" in Ancient Chinese Logic: A Comparison to "Categories" in Aristotelian Logic. History of Philosophy Quarterly 22 (3):181 - 199.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. A. C. Lloyd (1955). Ancient Formal Logic. Philosophical Quarterly 5 (19):175-178.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Vasilis Politis (2012). Self-Refutation (L.) Castagnoli Ancient Self-Refutation. The Logic and History of the Self-Refutation Argument From Democritus to Augustine. Pp. Xx + 394, Ills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. Cased, £60. ISBN: 978-0-521-89631-3. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 62 (1):86-88.score: 120.0
  38. Gert Heinz Müller (1954). I. M. Bocheński: Ancient Formal Logic. Dialectica 8 (1):78-80.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jaakko Hintikka & Unto Remes (1976). Ancient Geometrical Analysis and Modern Logic. In R. S. Cohen, P. K. Feyerabend & M. Wartofsky (eds.), Essays in Memory of Imre Lakatos. Reidel. 253--276.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Sun Weimin (2009). Chinese Logic and the Absence of Theoretical Sciences in Ancient China. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (4):403-423.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Antonio S. Cua (1984). Language and Logic in Ancient China. Review of Metaphysics 37 (3):634-635.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Sten Ebbesen (1982). Ancient Scholastic Logic as the Source of Medieval Scholastic Logic. In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge. 101--27.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Chad Hansen (1983). Language and Logic in Ancient China. University of Michigan Press.score: 120.0
  44. G. Movia (1995). The Scepticism of the Ancient Philosophers and Kantian Antinomies-Hegelian Logic of Quality. Rivista di Filosofia Neo-Scolastica 87 (4):551-595.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John Corcoran (1974). A Panel Discussion on the Future Research in Ancient Logical Theory. In , Ancient Logic and its Modern Interpretations. Boston,Reidel. 189--208.score: 100.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Susanne Bobzien (2003). Stoic Logic. In Brad Inwood (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Stoic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.score: 96.0
    ABSTRACT: An introduction to Stoic logic. Stoic logic can in many respects be regarded as a fore-runner of modern propositional logic. I discuss: 1. the Stoic notion of sayables or meanings (lekta); the Stoic assertibles (axiomata) and their similarities and differences to modern propositions; the time-dependency of their truth; 2.-3. assertibles with demonstratives and quantified assertibles and their truth-conditions; truth-functionality of negations and conjunctions; non-truth-functionality of disjunctions and conditionals; language regimentation and ‘bracketing’ devices; Stoic basic principles of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Susanne Bobzien (1999). Logic: The Stoics (Part Two). In Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. CUP.score: 96.0
    ABSTRACT: A detailed presentation of Stoic theory of arguments, including truth-value changes of arguments, Stoic syllogistic, Stoic indemonstrable arguments, Stoic inference rules (themata), including cut rules and antilogism, argumental deduction, elements of relevance logic in Stoic syllogistic, the question of completeness of Stoic logic, Stoic arguments valid in the specific sense, e.g. "Dio says it is day. But Dio speaks truly. Therefore it is day." A more formal and more detailed account of the Stoic theory of deduction can (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Susanne Bobzien (1999). Logic: The Megarics. In Keimpe Algra & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.score: 96.0
    ABSTRACT: Summary presentation of the surviving logic theories of Philo the Dialectician (aka Philo of Megara) and Diodorus Cronus, including some general remarks on propositional logical elements in their logic, a presentation of their theories of the conditional and a presentation of their modal theories, including a brief suggestion for a solution of the Master Argument.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jonathan Barnes (2012). Logical Matters. Clarendon Press.score: 94.0
    This volume presents 27 essays on logic in ancient philosophy by Jonathan Barnes, one of the most admired philosophers of his generation.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000