Search results for 'antilogism' (try it on Scholar)

19 found
Sort by:
  1. Susanne Bobzien (1996). Stoic Syllogistic. Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 14:133-92.score: 9.0
    ABSTRACT: For the Stoics, a syllogism is a formally valid argument; the primary function of their syllogistic is to establish such formal validity. Stoic syllogistic is a system of formal logic that relies on two types of argumental rules: (i) 5 rules (the accounts of the indemonstrables) which determine whether any given argument is an indemonstrable argument, i.e. an elementary syllogism the validity of which is not in need of further demonstration; (ii) one unary and three binary argumental rules which (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Susanne Bobzien (1999). Logic: The Stoics (Part Two). In Keimpe Algra, Jonathan Barnes & et al (eds.), The Cambridge History of Hellenistic Philosophy. CUP.score: 9.0
    ABSTRACT: A detailed presentation of Stoic theory of arguments, including truth-value changes of arguments, Stoic syllogistic, Stoic indemonstrable arguments, Stoic inference rules (themata), including cut rules and antilogism, argumental deduction, elements of relevance logic in Stoic syllogistic, the question of completeness of Stoic logic, Stoic arguments valid in the specific sense, e.g. "Dio says it is day. But Dio speaks truly. Therefore it is day." A more formal and more detailed account of the Stoic theory of deduction can be (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. C. F. Ladd-Franklin (1928). The Antilogism. Mind 37 (148):532-534.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Christine Ladd-Franklin (1913). The Antilogism--An Emendation. Journal of Philosophy, Psychology and Scientific Methods 10 (2):49-50.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Eugene Shen (1927). The Ladd-Franklin Formula in Logic: The Antilogism. Mind 36 (141):54-60.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ray H. Dotterer (1943). A Supplementary Note on the Rules of the Antilogism. Journal of Symbolic Logic 8 (1):24.score: 9.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. W. C. Wilcox (1969). The Antilogism Extended. Mind 78 (310):266-269.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ray H. Dotterer (1941). A Generalization of the Antilogism. Journal of Symbolic Logic 6 (3):90-95.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. J. C. C. McKinsey (1942). Review: Ray H. Dotterer, A Generalization of the Antilogism. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 7 (1):38-39.score: 9.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Ru Michael Sabre (1987). Extending the Antilogism. Logique Et Analyse 30:103-111.score: 9.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Evandro L. Gomes & Ítala M. L. D.?Ottaviano (2011). Aristotle's Theory of Deduction and Paraconsistency. Principia 14 (1):71-97.score: 6.0
    No Órganon Aristóteles descreve alguns esquemas dedutivos nos quais a presença de inconsistências não acarreta a trivialização da teoria lógica envolvida. Esta tese é corroborada por três diferentes situações teóricas estudadas por ele, as quais são apresentadas neste trabalho. Analizamos o esquema de inferência utilizado por Aristóteles no Protrepticus e o método de demonstração indireta para os silogismos categóricos. Ambos os métodos exemplificam como Aristóteles emprega estratégias de redução ao absurdo logicamente clássicas. Na sequência, discutimos os silogismos válidos a partir (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Ru Michael Sabre (1991). An Alternative Logical Framework for Dialectical Reasoning in the Social and Policy Sciences. Theory and Decision 30 (3):187-211.score: 6.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Alexander Nehamas (1990). Eristic, Antilogic, Sophistic, Dialectic: Plato's Demarcation of Philosophy From Sophistry. History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (1):3 - 16.score: 3.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Agostinho Almeida (2009). Canonical Extensions and Relational Representations of Lattices with Negation. Studia Logica 91 (2):171 - 199.score: 3.0
    This work is part of a wider investigation into lattice-structured algebras and associated dual representations obtained via the methodology of canonical extensions. To this end, here we study lattices, not necessarily distributive, with negation operations. We consider equational classes of lattices equipped with a negation operation ¬ which is dually self-adjoint (the pair (¬,¬) is a Galois connection) and other axioms are added so as to give classes of lattices in which the negation is De Morgan, orthonegation, antilogism, pseudocomplementation (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Gerard Allwein, Hilmi Demir & Lee Pike (2004). Logics for Classes of Boolean Monoids. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (3):241-266.score: 3.0
    This paper presents the algebraic and Kripke modelsoundness and completeness ofa logic over Boolean monoids. An additional axiom added to thelogic will cause the resulting monoid models to be representable as monoidsof relations. A star operator, interpreted as reflexive, transitiveclosure, is conservatively added to the logic. The star operator isa relative modal operator, i.e., one that is defined in terms ofanother modal operator. A further example, relative possibility,of this type of operator is given. A separate axiom,antilogism, added to the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Benoît Castelnérac & Mathieu Marion (2013). Antilogic. Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 8 (1).score: 3.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Alexander Nehamas (1986). Eristic, Antilogic, Sophistic, Dialectic. History of Philosophy Quarterly 7:3-16.score: 3.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Michael Mendelson (2001). Quintilian and the Pedagogy of Argument. Argumentation 15 (3):277-294.score: 2.0
    Originating in the Sophistic pedagogy of Protagoras and reflecting the sceptical practice of the New Academy, Quintilian's rhetorical pedagogy places a special emphasis on the juxtaposition of multiple, competing claims. This inherently dialogical approach to argumentation is referred to here as controversia and is on full display in Quintilian's own argumentative practice. More important to this paper, however, is the role of controversia as an organizing principle for Quintilian's rhetorical curriculum. In particular, Quintilian introduces the protocols of controversia through a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Steven D. Hales (1996). Nietzsche on Logic. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (4):819-835.score: 1.0
    Nietzsche is infamous for denouncing logic, but despite the importance of logic in contemporary philosophy, there has been very little scholarly attention paid to his criticisms. This paper argues that Nietzsche's antilogic polemics are directed against semantics, which he regards as being committed to a realist metaphysics. It is this metaphysical realism that Nietzsche abhors, not logical syntax or proof theory. Nietzsche is also at pains to critique logicians who naively accept realist semantics. Other interpreters who cast Nietzsche as a (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation