Search results for 'archimedes' (try it on Scholar)

75 found
Sort by:
  1. Mayeul Arminjon (2004). Gravity as Archimedes' Thrust and a Bifurcation in That Theory. Foundations of Physics 34 (11):1703-1724.score: 18.0
    Euler’s interpretation of Newton’s gravity (NG) as Archimedes’ thrust in a fluid ether is presented in some detail. Then a semi-heuristic mechanism for gravity, close to Euler’s, is recalled and compared with the latter. None of these two ‘‘gravitational ethers’’ can obey classical mechanics. This is logical since the ether defines the very reference frame, in which mechanics is defined. This concept is used to build a scalar theory of gravity: NG corresponds to an incompressible ether, a compressible ether (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Roshdi Rashed (1993). Al-Kindī's Commentary on Archimedes' 'The Measurement of the Circle'. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 3 (01):7-.score: 18.0
    The author examines the relationship between mathematics and philosophy in the works of al-Kind on the approximation of 's knowledge of mathematics, and on the history of the transmission of The Measurement of the Circle of Archimedes. The author shows that al-Kind M, and that it was one of the sources of the Florence Versions, the Latin commentary on the same proposition.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Huw Price (1996). Time's Arrow & Archimedes' Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. Oxford University Press.score: 18.0
    Why is the future so different from the past? Why does the past affect the future and not the other way around? What does quantum mechanics really tell us about the world? In this important and accessible book, Huw Price throws fascinating new light on some of the great mysteries of modern physics, and connects them in a wholly original way. Price begins with the mystery of the arrow of time. Why, for example, does disorder always increase, as required by (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Wilfrid Sellars (1981). Foundations for a Metaphysics of Pure Process, I: The Lever of Archimedes. The Monist 64 (1):3-36.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Peggy Marchi (1978). Lakatos Versus Archimedes: How New is the Idea That Mathematics Grows by Trial and Error? Philosophia 8 (2-3):295-315.score: 15.0
  6. Huw Price (1997). Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. OUP USA.score: 15.0
    `splendidly provocative ... enjoy it as a feast for the imagination.' John Gribbin, Sunday Times -/- Why is the future so different from the past? Why does the past affect the future and not the other way round? The universe began with the Big Bang - will it end with a 'Big Crunch'? This exciting book presents an innovative and controversial view of time and contemporary physics. Price urges physicists, philosophers, and anyone who has ever pondered the paradoxes of time (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. George Goe (1972). Archimedes' Theory of the Lever and Mach's Critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 2 (4):329-345.score: 15.0
  8. Reviel Netz (2003). The Goal of Archimedes' "Sand-Reckoner". Apeiron 36 (4):251 - 290.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Gordon Belot (1998). Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point. Philosophical Review 107 (3):477-480.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. D. L. Simms (1990). The Trail for Archimedes's Tomb. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 53:281-286.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John J. Cleary (2005). From Archimedes to Omar R. Netz: The Transformation of Mathematics in the Early Mediterranean World: From Problems to Equations . Pp. X + 198, Figs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Cased, £45, US$70. ISBN: 0-521-82996-. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 55 (02):450-.score: 15.0
  12. Ivor Bulmer Thomas (1958). Archimedes E. J. Dijksterhuis: Archimedes. Pp. 422; 173 Figs. Copenhagen: Munksgaard, 1956. Paper, Kr. 60. The Classical Review 8 (01):43-45.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Betsy Macken (1995). The Archimedes Project: Providing Leverage for Individuals with Disabilities Through Information Technology. Acm Sigcas Computers and Society 25 (2):19-23.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. G. Burniston Brown (1940). Why Do Archimedes and Eddington Both Get $\Text{IO}^{79}$ for the Total Number of Particles in the Universe? Philosophy 15 (59):269 - 284.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. D. R. Dicks (1973). The Budé Archimedes Charles Mugler: Archimède. Tome I. (Collection Budé) Pp. Xxx+259 (Text Double). Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1970. Paper, 45 Fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 23 (01):28-30.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Philippa Lang (2005). (R.) Netz The Works of Archimedes 1. Cambridge UP, 2004. Pp. X + 375, Illus. £75. 0521661609. Journal of Hellenic Studies 125:193-194.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. J. B. Trapp (1990). Archimedes's Tomb and the Artists: A Postscript. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 53:286-288.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jean Christianidis, Dimitris Dialetis & Kostas Gavroglu (2002). Having a Knack for the Non-Intuitive: Aristarchus's Heliocentrism Through Archimedes's Geocentrism. History of Science 40:147-168.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jean Christianidis (2013). The Archimedes Palimpsest: The Definitive Edition. [REVIEW] Metascience 22 (1):137-142.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. D. R. Dicks (1973). The Budé Archimedes. The Classical Review 23 (01):28-.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. G. Burniston Brown (1940). Why Do Archimedes and Eddington Both Get 1079 for the Total Number of Particles in the Universe? Philosophy 15 (59):269-.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Mario Geymonat (2009). Archimedes and the Roman Imagination (Review). Classical World 103 (1):111-112.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. J. L. Heiberg (1909). A Newly Discovered Treatise of Archimedes. The Monist 19 (2):202-224.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. P. Dowe (1998). Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):333-335.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Nick Huggett (1999). Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 59 (4):1093-1096.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Paul Keyser (2013). The Archimedes Palimpsest. By Reviel Netz, William Noel, Natalie Tchernetska, and Nigel Wilson (Eds.).(Review). Classical World 106 (4):708-709.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Andreola Rossi (2009). Archimedes and the Roman Imagination (Review). American Journal of Philology 130 (1):139-142.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Ivor Bulmer-Thomas (1974). The Budé Archimedes Ii and Iii. The Classical Review 24 (02):200-.score: 15.0
  29. Ivor Bulmer-Thomas (1974). The Budé Archimedes Ii and Iii Charles Mugler : Archiméde. (Collection Budé) Tomeii: Des Spirales, de l'Equilibre des Figures Planes, l'Arénaire, la Quadrature de la Parabole. Tome Iii: Des Corps Flottants, Stomachion, la Méthode, le Livre des Lemmes, le Probléme des Bœfs. Pp. 208, 184. Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 1971. Paper, 40, 35 Fr. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 24 (02):200-201.score: 15.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Craig Callender (1997). Review of H. Price, Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point'. [REVIEW] Metascience 11:68-71.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. R. J. Hankinson (1987). Richard H. Schlagel, From Myth to the Modern Mind: Volume I, Animism to Archimedes Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 7 (4):161-163.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jean Jolivet (1993). Al-Kindi's Commentary on Archimedes' The Measurement of the Circle Roshdi Rashed The Author Examines the Relationship Between Mathematics and Philosophy in the Works of Al-Kindi, and Suggests That the Real Character of His Contri-Bution Will Become Clear Only When We Restore to Mathematics Their Proper. Arabic Sciences and Philosophy 3:3-6.score: 15.0
  33. Philippa Lang (2005). The Works of Archimedes. Journal of Hellenic Studies 125:193-194.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. A. W. Lawrence (1946). Archimedes and the Design of Euryalus Fort. Journal of Hellenic Studies 66:99.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Michael Macrone (1995/2002). A Little Knowledge: What Archimedes Really Meant and 80 Other Key Ideas Explained. Ebury Press.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. George Molland (1981). Archimedes and the Middle Ages, Vol. Iii, by Marshall Clagett. History of Science 19:143-147.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Clemency Montelle (2013). R. Netz, W. Noel, N. Tchernetska, N. Wilson (Edd.) The Archimedes Palimpsest. Volume I: Catalogue and Commentary. Pp. Viii + 342, B/W & Colour Figs, B/W & Colour Ills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, for the Walters Art Museum, 2011. Cased, £85, US$140 (£150, US$215 Set). ISBN: 978-1-107-01457-2 (978-1-107-01684-2 Set).R. Netz, W. Noel, N. Tchernetska, N. Wilson (Edd.) The Archimedes Palimpsest. Volume II: Images and Transcriptions. Pp. 344, Colour Ills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, for the Walters Art Museum, 2011. Cased, £85, US$140 (£150, US$215 Set). ISBN: 978-1-107-01437-4 (978-1-107-01684-2 Set). [REVIEW] The Classical Review 63 (2):377-381.score: 15.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Joseph F. O'Callaghan (2005). José Chabás and Bernard R. Goldstein, The Alfonsine Tables of Toledo. (Archimedes: New Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science and Technology, 8.) Dordrecht, Boston, and London: Kluwer, 2003. Pp. Xiii, 341; Black-and-White Figures and Tables. $154. [REVIEW] Speculum 80 (4):1246-1248.score: 15.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Clifford A. Pickover (2008). Archimedes to Hawking: Laws of Science and the Great Minds Behind Them. Oxford University Press.score: 15.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Michalis Sialaros (2013). Netz R., Noel W., Tchernetska N. And Wilson N. Eds. The Archimedes Palimpsest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, for the Walters Art Museum, 2012. 2 Vols. Pp. 340 + 344. £150. 9781107016842. [REVIEW] Journal of Hellenic Studies 133:292-293.score: 15.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. David Eugene Smith (1909). A Commentary on the Heiberg Manuscript of Archimedes. The Monist 19 (2):225-230.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. J. F. Woodward (1996). Where Does the Weirdness Go? And Time's Arrow and Archimedes' Point. Foundations of Physics 26:955-964.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Maarten Van Dyck (2009). On the Epistemological Foundations of the Law of the Lever. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 40 (3):315-318.score: 9.0
    In this paper I challenge Paolo Palmieri’s reading of the Mach-Vailati debate on Archimedes’s proof of the law of the lever. I argue that the actual import of the debate concerns the possible epistemic (as opposed to merely pragmatic) role of mathematical arguments in empirical physics, and that construed in this light Vailati carries the upper hand. This claim is defended by showing that Archimedes’s proof of the law of the lever is not a way of appealing to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Solomon Marcus (2013). Starting From the Scenario Euclid–Bolyai–Einstein. Synthese:1-11.score: 9.0
    Our aim is to propose several itineraries which follow the scenario having as a first step Euclid’s Fifth Postulate; as a second step the Bolyai–Lobachevsky’s non-Euclidean geometries and as a third step Einstein’s relativity theory. The role of Euclid’s fifth postulate is successively assumed by Archimedes’ axiom; Zermelo’s choice axiom; Cantor’s continuum hypothesis; von Neumann’s foundation axiom for set theory; Church–Turing thesis and Turing’s computability; the validity of classical logic under the form of the principles of identity, non-contradiction and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. W. Randolph Kloetzli (2013). Myriad Concerns: Indian Macro-Time Intervals (Yugas, Sandhyās and Kalpas) as Systems of Number. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 41 (6):631-653.score: 6.0
    This article examines the structures of the epico-Purāṇic divisions of time (yugas/sandhyās/kalpas) and asks what is joined by the Purāṇic ages known as yugas or joinings. It concludes that these structures reflect a combining of three systems of number—Greek acrophonic, Babylonian sexagesimal and Hindu decimal— represented as divisions of time. Since most interpretations of these structures, particularly yugas, focus on questions of dharma and its decline over the various ages rather than on number, it asks in conclusion if there is (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. G. E. R. Lloyd (1990). Dimitris K. Raïos: Archimède, Ménélaos d'Alexandrie et le 'Carmen de ponderibus et mensuris': contributions à l'histoire des sciences. (ΠΑΝΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΙΟ ΙΩΑΝΝΙΝΩΝ ΕΠΙΣΤΗΜΟΝΙΚΗ ΝΠΝΤΗΡΔΑ φΙΛΟΣΟφΙΚΗΣ ΣΧΟΛΗΣ 'ΔΩΔΩξ039D;Η': ΠΑΡΑΡΤΗΜΑ, 29.) Pp. 256; 16 figures. Ioannina: University of Ioannina, 1989. Paper. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 40 (02):525-526.score: 5.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Giuseppe Cambiano (1998). Archimede meccanico e la meccanica di Archita. Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 19 (2):289-324.score: 5.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Jean-Louis Gardies (1981). Pascal Et l'Axiome D'Archimède. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 171 (4):425 - 440.score: 5.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Jean-Louis Gardies (1980). La méthode mécanique et le platonisme d'archimède. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 170 (1):39 - 43.score: 5.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. André Gardies (1981). Pascal et l'axiome d'Archimède. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 4:425-440.score: 5.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 75