Search results for 'causal theory of perception' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Naomi Eilan (2013). A Relational Response to Newman's Objection to Russell's Causal Theory of Perception. Theoria 80 (4).score: 1632.0
    The causal theory of perception (CTP) has come under a great deal of critical scrutiny from philosophers of mind interested in the nature of perception. M. H. Newman's set-theoretic objection to Russell's structuralist version of the CTP, in his 1928 paper “Mr Russell's Causal Theory of Perception” has not, to my knowledge, figured in these discussions. In this paper I aim to show that it should: Newman's objection can be generalized to yield a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Walter Horn (2012). Note on Two Snowdon Criticisms of the Causal Theory of Perception. Acta Analytica 27 (4):441-447.score: 1248.0
    Two arguments Paul Snowdon has brought against the causal theory of perception are examined. One involves the claim that, based on the phenomenology of perceptual situations, it cannot be the case that perception is an essentially causal concept. The other is a reductio , according to which causal theorists’ arguments imply that a proposition Snowdon takes to be obviously non-causal ( A is married to B ) can be analyzed into some sort of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Tadeusz Szubka (2002). The Causal Theory of Perception and Direct Realism. In Pragmatism and Realism. New York: Routledge.score: 1248.0
  4. Valtteri Arstila & Kalle Pihlainen (2009). The Causal Theory of Perception Revisited. Erkenntnis 70 (3):397 - 417.score: 1224.0
    It is generally agreed upon that Grice's causal theory of perception describes a necessary condition for perception. It does not describe sufficient conditions, however, since there are entities in causal chains that we do not perceive and not all causal chains yield perceptions. One strategy for overcoming these problems is that of strengthening the notion of causality (as done by David Lewis). Another is that of specifying the criteria according to which perceptual experiences should (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Jan Almäng (2013). The Causal Self‐Referential Theory of Perception Revisited. Dialectica 67 (1):29-53.score: 1206.0
    This is a paper about The Causal Self-Referential Theory of Perception. According to The Causal Self-Referential Theory as developed by above all John Searle and David Woodruff Smith, perceptual content is satisfied by an object only if the object in question has caused the perceptual experience. I argue initially that Searle's account cannot explain the distinction between hallucination and illusion since it requires that the state of affairs that is presented in the perceptual experience must (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Gerald Vision (1997). Problems of Vision: Rethinking the Causal Theory of Perception. New York: Oxford University Press.score: 1158.0
    In this book Gerald Vision argues for a new causal theory, one that engages provocatively with direct realism and makes no use of a now discredited subjectivism.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. J. Watling (1950). The Causal Theory of Perception. Mind 59 (October):539-540.score: 1128.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. H. P. Grice (1961). The Causal Theory of Perception, Part I. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 121:121-152.score: 1128.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Alan R. White (1961). The Causal Theory of Perception, Part II. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 153:153-168.score: 1128.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Thomas B. Frost (1990). In Defense of the Causal Representative Theory of Perception. Dialogue 32 (2-3):43-50.score: 1101.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Robert A. Oakes (1978). How to Rescue the Traditional Causal Theory of Perception. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 38 (March):370-383.score: 1072.0
  12. John Hyman (1992). The Causal Theory of Perception. Philosophical Quarterly 42 (168):277-296.score: 1068.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. L. Jonathan Cohen (1977). The Causal Theory of Perception. Aristotelian Society 127:127-141.score: 1068.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. F. R. Pickering (1974). A Refutation of an Objection to the Causal Theory of Perception. Analysis 34 (March):129-132.score: 1068.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. C. H. Whiteley (1940). The Causal Theory of Perception. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 40:89-102.score: 1056.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. M. H. A. Newman (1928). Mr. Russell's Causal Theory of Perception. Mind 5 (146):26-43.score: 1044.0
  17. Gerald Vision (1993). Animadversions on the Causal Theory of Perception. Philosophical Quarterly 44 (172):344-356.score: 1044.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Virgil C. Aldrich (1932). Taking the Causal Theory of Perception Seriously. Journal of Philosophy 29 (3):69-78.score: 1032.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Johannes Roessler (2011). 1 Strawson's Rationale for the Causal Theory of Perception. In Johannes Roessler, Hemdat Lerman & Naomi Eilan (eds.), Perception, Causation, and Objectivity. Oxford University Press. 103.score: 1032.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. H. P. Grice (1988). The Causal Theory of Perception. In Jonathan Dancy (ed.), Perceptual Knowledge. Oxford University Press.score: 1020.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Michael P. Bradie (1976). The Causal Theory of Perception. Synthese 33 (2-4):41 - 74.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. H. P. Grice & Alan R. White (1961). Symposium: The Causal Theory of Perception. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 35:121 - 168.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Clement Dore (1964). Ayer on the Causal Theory of Perception. Mind 73 (290):287-290.score: 1020.0
  24. Grover Maxwell (1972). Scientific Methodology and the Causal Theory of Perception. In Herbert Feigl, Wilfrid Sellars & Keith Lehrer (eds.), New Readings in Philosophical Analysis. Appleton-Century-Crofts. 289-314.score: 1020.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. John Heffner (1981). The Causal Theory of Visual Perception. International Philosophical Quarterly 21 (3):301-330.score: 1005.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Lawrence Hass (1991). The Antinomy of Perception: Merleau-Ponty and Causal Representation Theory. [REVIEW] Man and World 24 (1):13-25.score: 990.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Patrick Joseph McDonald (2003). Demonstration by Simulation: The Philosophical Significance of Experiment in Helmholtz's Theory of Perception. Perspectives on Science 11 (2):170-207.score: 786.0
    : Understanding Helmholtz's philosophy of science requires attention to his experimental practice. I sketch out such a project by showing how experiment shapes his theory of perception in three ways. One, the theory emerged out of empirical and experimental research. Two, the concept of experiment fills a critical conceptual gap in his theory of perception. Experiment functions not merely as a scientific technique, but also as a general epistemological strategy. Three, Helmholtz's experimental practice provides essential (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Stephen A. Dinan (1979). Spontaneity and Perception in Sartre's Theory of the Body. Philosophy Today 23 (3):279-291.score: 768.0
    It is commonly recognized that sartre's philosophy rests upon a doctrine of radical freedom or, More technically, The absolute spontaneity of conscious acts. Simply put, Sartre believes that consciousness alone determines its own intentional mode of being. But one such intentional mode of being is perception, In which sensible appearances seem to be radically dependent upon changes in the body's sense organs. The purpose of this paper is to examine sartre's theory of the body and critically analyze his (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Valer Ambrus (1999). Is Putnam's Causal Theory of Meaning Compatible with Internal Realism? Journal for General Philosophy of Science 30 (1):1-16.score: 711.0
    Putnam originally developed his causal theory of meaning in order to support scientific realism and reject the notion of incommensurability. Later he gave up this position and adopted instead what he called ‘internal realism’, but apparently without changing his mind on topics related to his former philosophy of language. The question must arise whether internal realism, which actually is a species of antirealism, is compatible with the causal theory of meaning. In giving an answer I begin (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Kirk Ludwig (1992). Brains in a Vat, Subjectivity, and the Causal Theory of Reference. Journal of Philosophical Research 17:313-345.score: 711.0
    This paper evaluates Putnam’s argument in the first chapter of Reason, Truth and History, for the claim that we can know that we are not brains in a vat (of a certain sort). A widespread response to Putnam’s argument has been that if it were successful not only the world but the meanings of our words (and consequently our thoughts) would be beyond the pale of knowledge, because a causal theory of reference is not compatible with our having (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Steven Davis (ed.) (1983). Causal Theories Of Mind: Action, Knowledge, Memory, Perception, And Reference. Ny: De Gruyter.score: 706.0
    INTRODUCTION SECTION I In the last 20 years or so philosophers in the analytic tradition have taken an increasing interest in causal theories of a wide ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Sonam Thakchoe (2012). Candrakīrti’s Theory of Perception: A Case for Non-Foundationalist Epistemology in Madhyamaka. Acta Orientalia Vilnensia 11 (1):93-125.score: 702.0
    Some argue that Candrakīrti is committed to rejecting all theories of perception in virtue of the rejection of the foundationalisms of the Nyāya and the Pramāṇika. Others argue that Candrakīrti endorses the Nyāya theory of perception. In this paper, I will propose an alternative non-foundationalist theory of perception for Candrakīriti. I will show that Candrakrti’s works provide us sufficient evidence to defend a typical Prāsagika’s account of perception that, I argue, complements his core non-foundationalist (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Sharon R. Ford (2012). Objects, Discreteness, and Pure Power Theories: George Molnar’s Critique of Sydney Shoemaker’s Causal Theory of Properties. [REVIEW] Metaphysica 13 (2):195-215.score: 702.0
    Sydney Shoemaker’s causal theory of properties is an important starting place for some contemporary metaphysical perspectives concerning the nature of properties. In this paper, I discuss the causal and intrinsic criteria that Shoemaker stipulates for the identity of genuine properties and relations, and address George Molnar’s criticism that holding both criteria presents an unbridgeable hypothesis in the causal theory of properties. The causal criterion requires that properties and relations contribute to the causal powers (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Sharon Ford (2012). Objects, Discreteness, and Pure Power Theories: George Molnar’s Critique of Sydney Shoemaker’s Causal Theory of Properties. [REVIEW] Metaphysica 13 (2):195-215.score: 702.0
    Sydney Shoemaker’s causal theory of properties is an important starting place for some contemporary metaphysical perspectives concerning the nature of properties. In this paper, I discuss the causal and intrinsic criteria that Shoemaker stipulates for the identity of genuine properties and relations, and address George Molnar’s criticism that holding both criteria presents an unbridgeable hypothesis in the causal theory of properties. The causal criterion requires that properties and relations contribute to the causal powers (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Matthew McAdam (2007). Self-Movement and Natural Normativity: Keeping Agents in the Causal Theory of Action. Dissertation, Georgetown Universityscore: 702.0
    Most contemporary philosophers of action accept Aristotle’s view that actions involve movements generated by an internal cause. This is reflected in the wide support enjoyed by the Causal Theory of Action (CTA), according to which actions are bodily movements caused by mental states. Some critics argue that CTA suffers from the Problem of Disappearing Agents (PDA), the complaint that CTA excludes agents because it reduces them to mere passive arenas in which certain events and processes take place. Extant (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Jonathan D. Payton (2014). Con-Reasons and the Causal Theory of Action. :1-14.score: 702.0
    Con-reasons and the causal theory of action. . ???aop.label???. doi: 10.1080/13869795.2014.910309.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Ram Neta (2009). Causal Theories of Knowledge and Perception. In Helen Beebee, Christopher Hitchcock & Peter Menzies (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Causation. Oup Oxford.score: 630.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. John Michael & Miles Macleod (2013). Applying the Causal Theory of Reference to Intentional Concepts. Philosophy of Science 80 (2):212-230.score: 623.3
  39. Seymour Wapner, Heinz Warner, Jan H. Bruell & Alvin G. Goldstein (1953). Experiments on Sensory-Tonic Field Theory of Perception: VII. Effect of Asymmetrical Extent and Starting Positions of Figures on the Visual Apparent Median Plane. Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (4):300.score: 623.3
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. E. J. Lowe (1993). Perception: A Causal Representative Theory. In Edmond Leo Wright (ed.), New Representationalisms: Essays in the Philosophy of Perception. Brookfield: Avebury.score: 618.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. David Premack & Guy Woodruff (1978). Chimpanzee Theory of Mind: Part I. Perception of Causality and Purpose in the Child and Chimpanzee. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1 (4):616.score: 615.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. C. S. Vyas (1991). Buddhist Theory of Perception with Special Reference to Pramāṇa Vārttika of Dharmakīrti. Navrang.score: 609.8
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Steven L. Reynolds (2003). The Model Theoretic Argument, Indirect Realism, and the Causal Theory of Reference Objection. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 84 (2):146-154.score: 609.0
  44. Sean Wilkie (1996). The Causal Theory of Veridical Hallucinations. Philosophy 71 (276):245-254.score: 609.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. István Aranyosi (2009). The Reappearing Act. Acta Analytica 24 (1):1 - 10.score: 606.0
    In his latest book, Roy Sorensen offers a solution to a puzzle he put forward in an earlier article -The Disappearing Act. The puzzle involves various question about how the causal theory perception is to be applied to the case of seeing shadows. Sorensen argues that the puzzle should be taken as bringing out a new way of seeing shadows. I point out a problem for Sorensen’s solution, and offer and defend an alternative view, according to which (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. John D. Dunne (2006). Realizing the Unreal: Dharmakīrti's Theory of Yogic Perception. [REVIEW] Journal of Indian Philosophy 34 (6):497-519.score: 594.0
    The Buddhist epistemologist Dharmakīrti (fl. ca. 7th century C.E.) developed a theory of yogic perception that achieved much influence among Buddhist thinkers in India and Tibet. His theory includes an odd problem: on Dharmakīrti’s view, many of the paradigmatic objects of the adept’s meditations do not really exist. How can one cultivate a meditative perception of the nonexistent? This ontological difficulty stems from Dharmakīrti’s decision to construe the Four Noble Truths as the paradigmatic objects of yogic (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Athanassios Raftopoulos (2001). Reentrant Neural Pathways and the Theory-Ladenness of Perception. Philosophy of Science 3 (September):S187-S199.score: 594.0
    In this paper I argue for the cognitive impenetrability of perception by undermining the argument from reentrant pathways. To do that I will adduce psychological and neuropsychological evidence showing that (a) early vision processing is not affected by our knowledge about specific objects and events, and (b) that the role of the descending pathways is to enable the early-vision processing modules to participate in higher-level visual or cognitive functions. My thesis is that a part of observation, which I will (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Christian Lotz (2007). Depiction and Plastic Perception. A Critique of Husserl's Theory of Picture Consciousness. Continental Philosophy Review 40 (2):171-185.score: 585.0
    In this paper, I will present an argument against Husserl’s analysis of picture consciousness. Husserl’s analysis of picture consciousness (as it can be found primarily in the recently translated volume Husserliana 23) moves from a theory of depiction in general to a theory of perceptual imagination. Though, I think that Husserl’s thesis that picture consciousness is different from depictive and linguistic consciousness is legitimate, and that Husserl’s phenomenology avoids the errors of linguistic theories, such as Goodman’s, I submit (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Nini Praetorius (2007). The Problems of Consciousness and Content in Theories of Perception. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 6 (3):349-367.score: 574.0
    The paper aims to show, first, that O’Regan’s and Noë’s Sensorimotor Theory of Vision and Visual Experiences suffers from circularity, and that evidence from empirical research within perception psychology unequivocally invalidates their theory. Secondly, to show that the circularity in O’Regan’s and Noë’s theory of vision and in other general causal and functional theories of perception (i.e. Gibson’s and Marr’s theories of perception) is the inevitable consequence of mutually conflicting assumption of Cartesian dualism (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Alan Weir (2004). An Ultra-Realist Theory of Perception. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (2):105-128.score: 553.5
    In this paper I argue for a theory of perception distinct both from classical sense-datum theories and from intentionalist theories, that is theories according to which one perceives external objects by dint of a relation with a propositional content. The alternative I propose completely rejects any representational element in perception. When one sees that an object has a property, the situation or state of affairs of its having that property is one's perception, so that the object (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000