Search results for 'co-evolution' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Max Velmans (2007). The Co-Evolution of Matter and Consciousness. Velmans, Prof Max (2007) the Co-Evolution of Matter and Consciousness. [Journal (Paginated)] 44 (2):273-282.score: 264.0
    Theories about the evolution of consciousness relate in an intimate way to theories about the distribution of consciousness, which range from the view that only human beings are conscious to the view that all matter is in some sense conscious. Broadly speaking, such theories can be classified into discontinuity theories and continuity theories. Discontinuity theories propose that consciousness emerged only when material forms reached a given stage of evolution, but propose different criteria for the stage at which this occurred. Continuity (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Helena Knyazeva & Sergei Kurdyumov (2001). Nonlinear Synthesis and Co-Evolution of Complex Systems. World Futures 57 (3):239-261.score: 240.0
    Today a change is imperative in approaching global problems: what is needed is not arm-twisting and power politics, but searching for ways of co-evolution in the complex social and geopolitical systems of the world. The modern theory of self-organization of complex systems provides us with an understanding of the possible forms of coexistence of heterogeneous social and geopolitical structures at different stages of development regarding the different paths of their sustainable co-evolutionary development. The theory argues that the evolutionary channel (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Pierre De Loor, Kristen Manac’H. & Jacques Tisseau (2009). Enaction-Based Artificial Intelligence: Toward Co-Evolution with Humans in the Loop. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 19 (3):319-343.score: 240.0
    This article deals with the links between the enaction paradigm and artificial intelligence. Enaction is considered a metaphor for artificial intelligence, as a number of the notions which it deals with are deemed incompatible with the phenomenal field of the virtual. After explaining this stance, we shall review previous works regarding this issue in terms of artificial life and robotics. We shall focus on the lack of recognition of co-evolution at the heart of these approaches. We propose to explicitly (...)
    Direct download (18 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Carla C. J. M. Millar, Chong-Ju Choi & Philip Y. K. Cheng (2009). Co-Evolution: Law and Institutions in International Ethics Research. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 87 (4):455 - 462.score: 240.0
    Despite the importance of the co-evolution approach in various branches of research, such as strategy, organisation theory, complexity, population ecology, technology and innovation (Lewin et al., 1999; March, 1991), co-evolution has been relatively neglected in international business and ethics research (Madhok and Phene, 2001). The purpose of this article is to show how co-evolution theory provides a theoretical framework within which some issues of ethics research are addressed. Our analysis is in the context of the contrasts between (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Frank Kressing, Matthis Krischel & Heiner Fangerau (2014). The 'Global Phylogeny' and its Historical Legacy: A Critical Review of a Unified Theory of Human Biological and Linguistic Co-Evolution. [REVIEW] Medicine Studies 4 (1-4):15-27.score: 240.0
    In a critical review of late twentieth-century gene-culture co-evolutionary models labelled as ‘global phylogeny’, the authors present evidence for the long legacy of co-evolutionary theories in European-based thinking, highlighting that (1) ideas of social and cultural evolution preceded the idea of biological evolution, (2) linguistics played a dominant role in the formation of a unified theory of human co-evolution, and (3) that co-evolutionary thinking was only possible due to perpetuated and renewed transdisciplinary reticulations between scholars of different disciplines—especially within (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Stephan Greiner & Ralph Bock (2013). Tuning a Ménage à Trois: Co‐Evolution and Co‐Adaptation of Nuclear and Organellar Genomes in Plants. Bioessays 35 (4):354-365.score: 210.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Stephen Gough (2009). Co-Evolution, Knowledge and Education: Adding Value to Learners' Options. Studies in Philosophy and Education 28 (1):27-38.score: 210.0
  8. Nigel Nicholson (2011). The Evolved Self, Self-Regulation, and the Co-Evolution of Leadership. Biological Theory 6 (4):399-412.score: 210.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. James R. Hurford (2008). Niche-Construction, Co-Evolution, and Domain-Specificity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):526-526.score: 180.0
    That language is shaped to fit the human brain is close to the Chomskyan position. The target article by Christiansen & Chater (C&C) assumes an entity, outside individual heads. What is the nature of this entity? Linguistic niche-construction and co-evolution of language and genes are possible, with some of what evolved being language-specific. Recent generative theory postulates much less than the old Universal Grammar (UG).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. James R. Hurford & Simon Kirby (1998). Co-Evolution of Language-Size and the Critical Period. In [Book Chapter] (Unpublished).score: 180.0
    Species evolve, very slowly, through selection of genes which give rise to phenotypes well adapted to their environments. The cultures, including the languages, of human communities evolve, much faster, maintaining at least a minimum level of adaptedness to the external, non- cultural environment. In the phylogenetic evolution of species, the transmission of information across generations is via copying of molecules, and innovation is by mutation and sexual recombination. In cultural evolution, the transmission of information across generations is by learning, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. W. Tecumseh Fitch (2008). Co-Evolution of Phylogeny and Glossogeny: There is No “Logical Problem of Language Evolution”. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5):521-522.score: 180.0
    Historical language change (), like evolution itself, is a fact; and its implications for the biological evolution of the human capacity for language acquisition () have been ably explored by many contemporary theorists. However, Christiansen & Chater's (C&C's) revolutionary call for a replacement of phylogenetic models with glossogenetic cultural models is based on an inadequate understanding of either. The solution to their lies before their eyes, but they mistakenly reject it due to a supposed Gene/;culture co-evolution poses a series (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Urooj Quezon Amjad (2006). A System of Innovation? Integrated Water Resources Management Complemented with Co-Evolution: Examples From Palestinian and Israeli Joint Water Management. World Futures 62 (3):157 – 170.score: 180.0
    A concept of co-evolution is argued to complement Integrated Water Resource Management's gap in administrative integration. Co-evolution's complement to Integrated Water Resource Management is explored through issues surrounding joint water management arrangements between the Israelis and Palestinians in the late 1990s and early 21st century. How co-evolution contributes to such a water management approach highlights how we might think about what it means to encourage innovation. Conclusions of the article suggest co-evolution provides the language and description (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Ben Jeffares (2010). The Co-Evolution of Tools and Minds: Cognition and Material Culture in the Hominin Lineage. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 9 (4):503-520.score: 168.0
    The structuring of our environment to provide cues and reminders for ourselves is common: We leave notes on the fridge, we have a particular place for our keys where we deposit them, making them easy to find. We alter our world to streamline our cognitive tasks. But how did hominins gain this capacity? What pushed our ancestors to structure their physical environment in ways that buffered thinking and began the process of using the world cognitively? I argue that the capacity (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Michael A. Arbib (2001). Co-Evolution of Human Consciousness and Language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 929:195-220.score: 162.0
  15. Ehud Lamm & Ohad Kammar (forthcoming). Inferring Co-Evolution. Philosophy of Science.score: 162.0
    We discuss two inference patterns for inferring the coevolution of two characters based on their properties at a single point in time and determine when developmental interactions can be used to deduce evolutionary order. We discuss the use of the inference patterns we present in the biological literature and assess the arguments’ validity, the degree of support they give to the evolutionary conclusion, how they can be corroborated with empirical evidence, and to what extent they suggest new empirically addressable questions. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Peter S. Albin & Duncan K. Foley (2001). The Co‐Evolution of Cooperation and Complexity in a Multi‐Player, Local‐Interaction Prisoners' Dilemma. Complexity 6 (3):54-63.score: 162.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Graciela Kuechle & Diego Rios (2012). Frequency Dependence Arguments for the Co-Evolution of Genes and Culture. In Martin H. Brinkworth & Friedel Weinert (eds.), Evolution 2.0: Implications of Darwinism in Philosophy and the Social and Natural Sciences. Springer.score: 156.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Christian Arnsperger, Probing the “Moralization of Capitalism” Problem: Democratic Experimentalism and the Co-Evolution of Norms.score: 150.0
    In what sense can we aim to moralize the very system upon which we rely to formulate our notions of morality? This is the most fundamental issue raised by any discussion around the “moralization of capitalism”. In an even more general manner, one could express the issue in terms of the puzzle of second-order morality: How exactly is it possible to pass a moral judgment on our categories of moral judgment? How can our norms of morality be said to be (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Michael Cavanaugh (1999). Review: The Symbolic Species: The Co-Evolution of Language and the Brain By Terrence W. Deacon. [REVIEW] Zygon 34 (1):195-198.score: 150.0
  20. Richard Dawkins (1989). Universal Parasitism and the Co-Evolution of Extended. Whole Earth Review.score: 150.0
    IN MANY RELIGIOUS CULTS AROUND THE world, ancestors Features are worshipped. And well they may be, for ancestors, not gods, hold..
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Ulrich Fiedeler (2011). When Does the Co-Evolution of Technology and Science Overturn Into Technoscience? Poiesis and Praxis 8 (2-3):83-101.score: 150.0
    In this paper, the relations between science and technology, intervention and representation, the natural and the artificial are analysed on the background of the formation of modern science in the sixteenth century. Due to the fact that technique has been essential for modern science from its early beginning, modern science is characterised by a hybridisation of knowledge and intervention. The manipulation of nature in order to measure its properties has steadily increased until artificial things have been produced, such as laser (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ken Baskin (2000). Corporate DNA: Organizational Learning, Corporate Co-Evolution. [REVIEW] Emergence 2 (1):34-49.score: 150.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Ronnie Zoe Hawkins (2006). Introduction: Beyond Nature/Culture Dualism: Let's Try Co-Evolution Instead of "Control". Ethics and the Environment 11 (2):1-11.score: 150.0
  24. Iris van Rooij (2005). Barbara Gorayska and Jacob L. Mey (Eds), Cognition and Technology: Co-Existence, Convergence and Co-Evolution. [REVIEW] Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (3):647-655.score: 150.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Diana Hicks (2012). One Size Doesn't Fit All: On the Co-Evolution of National Evaluation Systems and Social Science Publishing. Confero Essays on Education Philosophy and Politics 1 (1):67-90.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. David Katerndahl (2012). Co‐Evolution of Departmental Research Collaboration and Scholarly Outcomes. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (6):1241-1247.score: 150.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Lorenzo Magnani (2011). External Diagrammatization and Iconic Brain Co-Evolution. Semiotica 2011 (186):213-238.score: 150.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Max Velmans (2008). La Co-Évolution de la Matière Et de la Conscience. Synthesis Philosophica 22 (2):273-282.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Jonathan Bach & David Stark (2004). Link, Search, Interact: The Co-Evolution of NGOs and Interactive Technology. Theory, Culture and Society 21 (3):101-117.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Philippe Beaujard (2013). Systèmes-mondes anciens. Processus de domination, de co-évolution et de résistance. L'exemple de la côte est-africaine avant le XVIIe siècle. Actuel Marx 1 (1):40-62.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Henry Etzkowitz (2010). From Conflict to Confluence of Interest : The Co-Evolution of Academic Entrepreneurship and Intellectual Property Rights. In Thomas H. Murray & Josephine Johnston (eds.), Trust and Integrity in Biomedical Research: The Case of Financial Conflicts of Interest. Johns Hopkins University Press.score: 150.0
  32. Steven Feld (1996). A Poetics of Place: Ecological and Aesthetic Co-Evolution in a Papua New Guinea Rainforest Community. In R. F. Ellen & Katsuyoshi Fukui (eds.), Redefining Nature: Ecology, Culture, and Domestication. Berg. 61--87.score: 150.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Katsuyoshi Fukui (1996). Co-Evolution Between Humans and Domesticates: The Cultural Selection of Animal Coat-Colour Diversity Among the Bodi. In R. F. Ellen & Katsuyoshi Fukui (eds.), Redefining Nature: Ecology, Culture, and Domestication. Berg. 319--386.score: 150.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Juan Carlos Pérez Jiménez (2001). Bruce Mazlish: The Fourth Discontinuity. The Co-Evolution of Humans and Machines. Yale University Press, New Haven y Londres, 1993. Foro Interno. Anuario de Teoría Política 1:155-156.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Nikolai Krementsov (2010). Darwinism, Marxism, and Genetics in the Soviet Union: The Dialectics of Co-Evolution. In Denis Alexander & Ronald L. Numbers (eds.), Biology and Ideology From Descartes to Dawkins. The University of Chicago Press.score: 150.0
  36. Jordan Zlatev (2008). The Co-Evolution of Intersubjectivity and Bodily Mimesis. In J. Zlatev, T. Racine, C. Sinha & E. Itkonen (eds.), The Shared Mind: Perspectives on Intersubjectivity. John Benjamins. 215--244.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Brian McLoone (2012). Collaboration and Human Social Evolution: Review of Michael Tomasello's Why We Cooperate (MIT Press, 2009). [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 27 (1):137-147.score: 144.0
    Michael Tomasello’s new book Why We Cooperate explores the ontogeny and evolution of human altruism and human cooperation, paying particular attention to how such behaviors allow humans to create social institutions.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Ariel D. Chipman (2010). Parallel Evolution of Segmentation by Co‐Option of Ancestral Gene Regulatory Networks. Bioessays 32 (1):60-70.score: 132.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. J. Landes (forthcoming). Evolution and Rationality: Decisions, Co-Operation and Strategic Behaviour. Philosophical Quarterly.score: 126.0
    This monograph is a collection of conference contributions chosen by the editors who led a three-year project on evolution, cooperation, and rationality. The collected works are held together by a six-page introduction identifying common strands and differences of positions in the different chapters. Since no two chapters have a common author, the chapters do not build on each other. Rather, they offer a variety of perspectives on a number of different aspects of rationality and evolution. The monograph thus does not (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. C. Lloyd Morgan (1927). Holism and Evolution. By General The Right Honourable J. C. Smuts . (London: Macmillan & Co. 1926. Pp. 361 + Ix. Price, 18s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 2 (05):93-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. C. Prendergast (1977). Book Reviews : Between Experience and Metaphysics: Philosophical Problems of the Evolution of Science. By Stefan Amsterdamski. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Volume 35. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel Publ. Co. $22.00. [REVIEW] Philosophy of the Social Sciences 7 (4):410-412.score: 120.0
  42. A. I. Richards (1936). Race, Sex and Environment: A Study of Mineral Deficiency in Human Evolution. By J. R. De la H. Marett. (London: Hutchinson & Co. 1936. Pp. 342. Price 21s.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 11 (43):373-.score: 120.0
  43. John Laird (1930). Modern Materialism and Emergent Evolution. By W. McDougall M.B., F.R.S. (London: Methuen & Co. 1929. Pp. Xi + 295. Price 7s. 6d. Net.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 5 (17):119-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. F. B. Jevons (1898). Ihering's Evolution of the Aryan The Evolution of the Aryan. By Rudolph Von Ihering. Translated From the German by A. Drucker, M.P. London: Swan, Sonnenschein & Co. 1897. Pp. 412. Price 10s. 6d. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 12 (08):418-419.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. John C. Lucchesi (1984). The Genetics of Sex. Evolution of Sex Determining Mechanisms. By JAMES J. BBULL. The Benjamin/Cummings Publ. Co., Inc. 1983. Pp. 269. £16.95. [REVIEW] Bioessays 1 (2):89-89.score: 120.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Vivian Bohl & Alan P. Fiske (2014-02). In and Out of Each Other's Bodies: Theory of Mind, Evolution, Truth, and the Nature of the Social. Maurice Bloch. Boulder, CO: Paradigm, 2012. 161 Pp. [REVIEW] American Ethnologist 41 (1):214-215.score: 120.0
  47. L. Doncaster (1914). Evolution by Co-Operation. A Study in Bioeconomics. The Eugenics Review 6 (2):164.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. F. A. E. Crew (1937). Head, Heart and Hands in Human Evolution. By R. R. Marett D.Sc., LL.D.. (London: Hutchinson & Co. 1935. Pp. 303. Price 10s. 6d.). [REVIEW] Philosophy 12 (47):376-.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Rory Smead (2013). Evolution and Apparent Irrationality (Reviewing S. Okasha and K. Binmore, Eds, Evolution and Rationality: Decisions, Co-Operation and Strategic Behavior). Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (3):451-454.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. N. Curcio (1998). " Co-Being" and Ereignis. Notes on the Evolution of" Being Together" in the Thought of Heidegger. Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 27 (3-4).score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000