Search results for 'conceptual role semantics' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. What is Nonsolipsistic Conceptual Role Semantics (1987). Gilbert Harman. In Ernest Lepore (ed.), New Directions in Semantics. Academic Press. 55.score: 960.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ralph Wedgwood (2001). Conceptual Role Semantics for Moral Terms. Philosophical Review 110 (1):1-30.score: 720.0
    This paper outlines a new approach to the task of giving an account of the meaning of moral statements: a sort of "conceptual role semantics", according to which the meaning of moral terms is given by their role in practical reasoning. This role is sufficient both to distinguish the meaning of any moral term from that of other terms, and to determine the property or relation (if any) that the term stands for. The paper ends (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Daniel Whiting, Conceptual Role Semantics. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 714.0
    In the philosophy of language, conceptual role semantics (hereafter CRS) is a theory of what constitutes the meanings possessed by expressions of natural languages, or the propositions expressed by their utterance. In the philosophy of mind, it is a theory of what constitutes the contents of psychological attitudes, such as beliefs or desires. CRS comes in a variety of forms, not always clearly distinguished by commentators. Such versions are known variously as functional/causal/computational role semantics, and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gabor Forrai (2009). Brandom on Two Problems of Conceptual Role Semantics. In Barbara Merker (ed.), Vertehen nach Heidegger und Brandom.score: 624.0
    The paper examines how Brandom can respond to two objections raised against another sort of inferentialism, conceptual role semantics. After a brief explanation of the difference between the motivations and the nature of the two accounts (I), I argue that externalism can be accommodated within Brandomian inferentialism (II). Then I offer a reconstruction of how Brandom tries to explain mutual understanding (III-IV). Finally I point out a problem in Brandom’s account, which is this. Brandom’s inferential roles are (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Gabor Forrai (2008). Conceptual Role Semantics and Naturalizing Meaning. Croatian Journal of Philosophy 8 (24):337-348.score: 624.0
    In this paper I will do three things. One, to explain why conceptual role semantics seems an attractive theory of meaning (I). Two, to sketch a version of it which has a good chance of withstanding some of the standard objections (II-III). Three, to see what follows from this version with respect to the naturalization of meaning (IV).
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Ned Block (1998). Conceptual Role Semantics. In Edward Craig (ed.), Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Routledge. 242-256.score: 558.0
    According to Conceptual Role Semantics ("CRS"), the meaning of a representation is the role of that representation in the cognitive life of the agent, e.g. in perception, thought and decision-making. It is an extension of the well known "use" theory of meaning, according to which the meaning of a word is its use in communication and more generally, in social interaction. CRS supplements external use by including the role of a symbol inside a computer or (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. William J. Rapaport (2002). Holism, Conceptual-Role Semantics, and Syntactic Semantics. Minds and Machines 12 (1):3-59.score: 558.0
    This essay continues my investigation of `syntactic semantics': the theory that, pace Searle's Chinese-Room Argument, syntax does suffice for semantics (in particular, for the semantics needed for a computational cognitive theory of natural-language understanding). Here, I argue that syntactic semantics (which is internal and first-person) is what has been called a conceptual-role semantics: The meaning of any expression is the role that it plays in the complete system of expressions. Such a `narrow', (...)
    Direct download (20 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Ingo Brigandt (2004). Conceptual Role Semantics, the Theory Theory, and Conceptual Change. In Proceedings First Joint Conference of the Society for Philosophy and Psychology and the European Society for Philosophy and Psychology, Barcelona, Spain.score: 540.0
    The purpose of the paper is twofold. I first outline a philosophical theory of concepts based on conceptual role semantics. This approach is explicitly intended as a framework for the study and explanation of conceptual change in science. Then I point to the close similarities between this philosophical framework and the theory theory of concepts, suggesting that a convergence between psychological and philosophical approaches to concepts is possible. An underlying theme is to stress that using a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Barry M. Loewer (1982). The Role of 'Conceptual Role Semantics'. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (July):305-15.score: 534.0
  10. Ted A. Warfield (1993). On a Semantic Argument Against Conceptual Role Semantics. Analysis 53 (4):298-304.score: 534.0
  11. Ned Block (1997). Semantics, Conceptual Role. In [Book Chapter] (Unpublished). Routledge. 242--256.score: 525.0
    According to Conceptual Role Semantics ("CRS"), the meaning of a representation is the role of that representation in the cognitive life of the agent, e.g. in perception, thought and decision-making. It is an extension of the well known "use" theory of meaning, according to which the meaning of a word is its use in communication and more generally, in social interaction. CRS supplements external use by including the role of a symbol inside a computer or (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gilbert Harman (1982). Conceptual Role Semantics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (April):242-56.score: 468.0
  13. Robert C. Cummins (1992). Conceptual Role Semantics and the Explanatory Role of Content. Philosophical Studies 65 (1-2):103-127.score: 468.0
    I've tried to argue that there is more to representational content than CRS can acknowledge. CRS is attractive, I think, because of its rejection of atomism, and because it is a plausible theory of targets. But those are philosopher's concerns. Someone interested in building a person needs to understand representation, because, as AI researchers have urged for some time, good representation is the secret of good performance. I have just gestured in the direction I think a viable theory of representation (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Gilbert Harman (1987). (Nonsolipsistic) Conceptual Role Semantics. In Ernest LePore (ed.), New Directions in Semantics. Academic Press. 242-256.score: 459.0
  15. Carsten Hansen (1997). Conceptual Role Semantics and Verification-Transcendent Truth. In Dunja Jutronic (ed.), The Maribor Papers in Naturalized Semantics. Maribor. 43.score: 459.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Mark Greenberg & Gilbert Harman (2007). Conceptual Role Semantics. In Ernest LePore & Barry Smith (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford University Press. 242-256.score: 450.0
    CRS says that the meanings of expressions of a language or other symbol system or the contents of mental states are determined and explained by the way symbols are used in thinking. According to CRS one.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Brian Loar (1982). Conceptual Role and Truth-Conditions: Comments on Harman's Paper: &Quot;Conceptual Role Semantics&Quot;. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (3):272-283.score: 450.0
  18. Massimiliano Vignolo (2010). Why Non-Factualists Should Love Conceptual Role Semantics. Grazer Philosophische Studien 80 (1):1-19.score: 450.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Marion Vorms, Conceptual Role Semantics and Theory Understanding: The Case of Classical Mechanics.score: 450.0
  20. Mark Perlman (1997). The Trouble with Two-Factor Conceptual Role Theories. Minds and Machines 7 (4):495-513.score: 324.0
    Two-Factor conceptual role theories of mental content are often intended to allow mental representations to satisfy two competing requirements. One is the Fregean requirement that two representations, like public language expressions, can have different meanings even though they have the same reference (as in the case of ‘morning star’ and ‘evening star’). The other is Putnam's Twin-earth requirement that two representations or expressions can have the same conceptual role but differ in meaning due to differing references. (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Hartry Field (1977). Logic, Meaning, and Conceptual Role. Journal of Philosophy 74 (July):379-409.score: 282.0
  22. James E. Tomberlin (1988). Semantics, Psychological Attitudes, and Conceptual Roles. Philosophical Studies 53 (March):205-226.score: 239.0
  23. Jerry A. Fodor & Ernest LePore (1991). Why Meaning (Probably) Isn't Conceptual Role. Mind and Language 6 (4):328-43.score: 237.0
    It's an achievement of the last couple of decades that people who work in linguistic semantics and people who work in the philosophy of language have arrived at a friendly, de facto agreement as to their respective job descriptions. The terms of this agreement are that the semanticists do the work and the philosophers do the worrying. The semanticists try to construct actual theories of meaning (or truth theories, or model theories, or whatever) for one or another kind of (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Brian Loar (1982). Conceptual Role and Truth Conditions. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 23 (July):272-83.score: 228.0
  25. Brian P. McLaughlin (1993). On Punctate Content and on Conceptual Role. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (3):653-660.score: 228.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. J. A. Fodor & E. LePore (1993). Why Meaning (Probably) Isn't Conceptual Role. Philosophical Issues 3 (4):15-35.score: 219.0
    It's an achievement of the last couple of decades that people who work in linguistic semantics and people who work in the philosophy of language have arrived at a friendly, de facto agreement as to their respective job descriptions. The terms of this agreement are that the semanticists do the work and the philosophers do the worrying. The semanticists try to construct actual theories of meaning (or truth theories, or model theories, or whatever) for one or another kind of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Jess Gropen (1992). Affectedness and Direct Objects : The Role of Lexical Semantics in the Acquisition of Verb Argument Structure. In Beth Levin & Steven Pinker (eds.), Lexical & Conceptual Semantics. Blackwell. 153-195.score: 216.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Bradley Rives (2010). Concepts and Perceptual Belief: How (Not) to Defend Recognitional Concepts. Acta Analytica 25 (4):369-391.score: 198.0
    Recognitional concepts have the following characteristic property: thinkers are disposed to apply them to objects merely on the basis of undergoing certain perceptual experiences. I argue that a prominent strategy for defending the existence of constitutive connections among concepts, which appeals to thinkers’ semantic-cum-conceptual intuitions, cannot be used to defend the existence of recognitional concepts. I then outline and defend an alternative argument for the existence of recognitional concepts, which appeals to certain psychological laws.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Guido Gainotti (2012). The Role of Body-Related and Environmental Sources of Knowledge in the Construction of Different Conceptual Categories. Frontiers in Psychology 3.score: 197.0
    Controversies exist about: (a) the relationships between perceptual and conceptual activities and (b) the format and neuro-anatomical substrates of concepts. Some authors maintain that concepts are represented in the brain in an abstract manner, totally unrelated to the sensory-motor functions of the brain, whereas other authors argue that concepts are represented in the same format in which they have been constructed by the sensory-motor system. The present paper will survey two groups of investigations that play in favour of the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Bradley Rives (2009). The Empirical Case Against Analyticity: Two Options for Concept Pragmatists. Minds and Machines 19 (2):199-227.score: 192.0
    It is commonplace in cognitive science that concepts are individuated in terms of the roles they play in the cognitive lives of thinkers, a view that Jerry Fodor has recently been dubbed ‘Concept Pragmatism’. Quinean critics of Pragmatism have long argued that it founders on its commitment to the analytic/synthetic distinction, since without such a distinction there is plausibly no way to distinguish constitutive from non-constitutive roles in cognition. This paper considers Fodor’s empirical arguments against analyticity, and in particular his (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Massimo Warglien & Peter Gärdenfors (2013). Semantics, Conceptual Spaces, and the Meeting of Minds. Synthese 190 (12):2165-2193.score: 192.0
    We present an account of semantics that is not construed as a mapping of language to the world but rather as a mapping between individual meaning spaces. The meanings of linguistic entities are established via a “meeting of minds.” The concepts in the minds of communicating individuals are modeled as convex regions in conceptual spaces. We outline a mathematical framework, based on fixpoints in continuous mappings between conceptual spaces, that can be used to model such a (...). If concepts are convex, it will in general be possible for interactors to agree on joint meaning even if they start out from different representational spaces. Language is discrete, while mental representations tend to be continuous—posing a seeming paradox. We show that the convexity assumption allows us to address this problem. Using examples, we further show that our approach helps explain the semantic processes involved in the composition of expressions. (shrink)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Simone Gozzano (2006). Functional Role Semantics and Reflective Equilibrium. Acta Analytica 21 (38):62-76.score: 180.0
    In this paper it is argued that functional role semantics can be saved from criticisms, such as those raised by Putnam and Fodor and Lepore, by indicating which beliefs and inferences are more constitutive in determining mental content. The Scylla is not to use vague expressions; the Charybdis is not to endorse the analytic/synthetic distinction. The core idea is to use reflective equilibrium as a strategy to pinpoint which are the beliefs and the inferences that constitute the content (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Daniel J. Whiting (2008). Conservatives and Racists: Inferential Role Semantics and Pejoratives. Philosophia 36 (3):375-388.score: 180.0
    According to inferential role semantics (IRS), for any given expression to possess a particular meaning one must be disposed to make or, alternatively, acknowledge as correct certain inferential transitions involving it. As Williamson points out, pejoratives such as ‘Boche’ seem to provide a counter-example to IRS. Many speakers are neither disposed to use such expressions nor consider it proper to do so. But it does not follow, as IRS appears to entail, that such speakers do not understand pejoratives (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Herbert H. Clark & Stuart K. Card (1969). Role of Semantics in Remembering Comparative Sentences. Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):545.score: 168.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Francisco Calvo Garzón (2000). State Space Semantics and Conceptual Similarity: Reply to Churchland. Philosophical Psychology 13 (1):77-95.score: 156.0
    Jerry Fodor and Ernest Lepore [(1992) Holism: a shopper's guide, Oxford: Blackwell; (1996) in R. McCauley (Ed.) The Churchlands and their critics , Cambridge: Blackwell] have launched a powerful attack against Paul Churchland's connectionist theory of semantics--also known as state space semantics. In one part of their attack, Fodor and Lepore argue that the architectural and functional idiosyncrasies of connectionist networks preclude us from articulating a notion of conceptual similarity applicable to state space semantics. Aarre Laakso (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Gerard R. Ridgway Sebastian J. Crutch, Joshua Troche, Jamie Reilly (2013). Abstract Conceptual Feature Ratings: The Role of Emotion, Magnitude, and Other Cognitive Domains in the Organization of Abstract Conceptual Knowledge. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 156.0
    This study harnessed control ratings of the contribution of different types of information (sensation, action, emotion, thought, social interaction, morality, time, space, quantity and polarity) to 400 individual abstract and concrete verbal concepts. These abstract conceptual feature (ACF) ratings were used to generate a high dimensional semantic space, from which Euclidean distance measurements between individual concepts were extracted as a metric of the semantic relatedness of those words. The validity of these distances as a marker of semantic relatedness was (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Victoria von Groddeck (2011). Rethinking the Role of Value Communication in Business Corporations From a Sociological Perspective - Why Organisations Need Value-Based Semantics to Cope with Societal and Organisational Fuzziness. Journal of Business Ethics 100 (1):69 - 84.score: 156.0
    Why is it so plausible that business organisations in contemporary society use values in their communication? In order to answer this question, a sociological, system theoretical approach is applied which approaches values not pre-empirically as invisible drivers for action but as observable semantics that form organisational behaviour. In terms of empirical material, it will be shown that business organisations resort to a communication of values whenever uncertainty or complexity is very high. Inevitably, value semantics are applied in organisations (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Arvid Båve (2013). Compositional Semantics for Expressivists. Philosophical Quarterly 63 (253):633-659.score: 153.0
    I here propose a hitherto unnoticed possibility of solving embedding problems for noncognitivist expressivists in metaethics by appeal to Conceptual Role Semantics. I show that claims from the latter as to what constitutes various concepts can be used to define functions from states expressed by atomic sentences to states expressed by complex sentences, thereby allowing an expressivist semantics that satisfies a rather strict compositionality constraint (as well as a further, substantial explanatory constraint). The proposal can be (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Paul A. Boghossian (1994). Inferential-Role Semantics and the Analytic/Synthetic Distinction. Philosophical Studies 73 (2-3):109-122.score: 152.0
    This is a critical discussion of Jerry Fodor and Ernie Lepore's "Holism". The paper questions the existence of a slippery slope from some inferential liaisons are constitutive of meaning' to all inferential liaisons are constitutive of meaning'. "Interalia", it defends the existence of an analytic/synthetic distinction.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Paul A. Boghossian (1993). Does an Inferential Role Semantics Rest Upon a Mistake? Mind and Language 8 (1):27-40.score: 152.0
  41. William J. Rapaport (2003). What Did You Mean by That? Misunderstanding, Negotiation, and Syntactic Semantics. Minds and Machines 13 (3):397-427.score: 151.0
    Syntactic semantics is a holistic, conceptual-role-semantic theory of how computers can think. But Fodor and Lepore have mounted a sustained attack on holistic semantic theories. However, their major problem with holism (that, if holism is true, then no two people can understand each other) can be fixed by means of negotiating meanings. Syntactic semantics and Fodor and Lepore’s objections to holism are outlined; the nature of communication, miscommunication, and negotiation is discussed; Bruner’s ideas about the negotiation (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Katalin Balog (2009). Jerry Fodor on Non-Conceptual Content. Synthese 167 (3):311 - 320.score: 144.0
    Proponents of non-conceptual content have recruited it for various philosophical jobs. Some epistemologists have suggested that it may play the role of “the given” that Sellars is supposed to have exorcised from philosophy. Some philosophers of mind (e.g., Dretske) have suggested that it plays an important role in the project of naturalizing semantics as a kind of halfway between merely information bearing and possessing conceptual content. Here I will focus on a recent proposal by Jerry (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Luke Jerzykiewicz (2012). Mathematical Realism and Conceptual Semantics. In Oleg Prosorov & Vladimir Orevkov (eds.), Philosophy, Mathematics, Linguistics: Aspects of Interaction. Euler International Mathematical Institute.score: 144.0
    The dominant approach to analyzing the meaning of natural language sentences that express mathematical knowl- edge relies on a referential, formal semantics. Below, I discuss an argument against this approach and in favour of an internalist, conceptual, intensional alternative. The proposed shift in analytic method offers several benefits, including a novel perspective on what is required to track mathematical content, and hence on the Benacerraf dilemma. The new perspective also promises to facilitate discussion between philosophers of mathematics and (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Steven Horst, Goldilocks Searches for a Conceptual Semantics.score: 144.0
    This is a relatively breezy version of an exploration of some issues about how to provide a theory of concepts and conceptual semantics. I have also written more conventional versions of some of this material (without the Three Bears motif), though those are set in a broader context.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Claire Horisk (2007). The Expressive Role of Truth in Truth-Conditional Semantics. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):535–557.score: 144.0
    I define 'skim semantics' to be a Davidson-style truth-conditional semantics combined with a variety of deflationism about truth. The expressive role of truth in truth-conditional semantics precludes at least some kinds of skim semantics; thus I reject the idea that the challenge to skim semantics derives solely from Davidson's explanatory ambitions, and in particular from the 'truth doctrine', the view that the concept of truth plays a central explanatory role in Davidsonian theories of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Kristian Petrov (2008). Construction, Reconstruction, Deconstruction: The Fall of the Soviet Union From the Point of View of Conceptual History. Studies in East European Thought 60 (3):179 - 205.score: 144.0
    The fall of the Soviet Union is analysed in conceptual terms, drawing on Reinhart Koselleck’s Begriffsgeschichte. The author seeks to interpret the instrumental role of the concepts perestrojka, glasnost´, reform, revolution, socialist pluralism, and acceleration in the Soviet collapse. The semantics and pragmatics are related to a wider intellectual and political context, and the conceptual perspective is used to help explain the progress of events. The author argues that the common notion of the reform policy concepts (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Manuel Bremer (2008). Conceptual Atomism and Justificationist Semantics. Lang.score: 144.0
    Conceptual atomism of this type is incompatible with many other semantic approaches. One of these approaches is justificationist semantics. This book assumes conceptual atomism.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Veronica Rodriguez-Blanco (2003). A Defence of Hart's Semantics as Nonambitious Conceptual Analysis. Legal Theory 9 (2):99-124.score: 144.0
    Two methodological claims in Hart's TheConceptofLaw have produced perplexity: that it is a book on 1 and that it may also be regarded as an essay in 2 Are these two ideas reconcilable? We know that mere analysis of our legal concepts cannot tell us much about their properties, that is, about the empirical aspect of law. We have learned this from philosophical criticisms of conceptual analysis; yet Hart informs us that analytic jurisprudence can be reconciled with descriptive sociology. (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Abou-Malham Sabina, Hatem Marie & Leduc Nicole (2013). Understanding the Implementation of a Complex Intervention Aiming to Change a Health Professional Role: A Conceptual Framework for Implementation Evaluation. Open Journal of Philosophy 3 (4):491.score: 144.0
    This paper proposes a conceptual framework for understanding the implementation process of a complex intervention concerned with professional role change. The proposed framework holds that the intervention must address three interacting systems (socio-cultural, educational and disciplinary) through which a health professional role is evolved. Each system is operationalized by four dimensions (values, methods, actors and targets). As for the implementation, the framework posits that it can be analyzed, by depicting the barriers and facilitators located within the dimensions (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. V. V. Cifarelli & V. Sevim (2014). Examining the Role of Re-Presentation in Mathematical Problem Solving: An Application of Ernst von Glasersfeld's Conceptual Analysis. Constructivist Foundations 9 (3):360-369.score: 144.0
    Context: The paper utilizes a conceptual analysis to examine the development of abstract conceptual structures in mathematical problem solving. In so doing, we address two questions: 1. How have the ideas of RC influenced our own educational theory? and 2. How has our application of the ideas of RC helped to improve our understanding of the connection between teaching practice and students’ learning processes? Problem: The paper documents how Ernst von Glasersfeld’s view of mental representation can be illustrated (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000