Search results for 'correspondence theory of truth' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. James O. Young (2002). The Slingshot Argument and the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Acta Analytica 17 (2):121-132.score: 1452.0
    The correspondence theory of truth holds that each true sentence corresponds to a discrete fact. Donald Davidson and others have argued (using an argument that has come to be known as the slingshot) that this theory is mistaken, since all true sentences correspond to the same “Great Fact.” The argument is designed to show that by substituting logically equivalent sentences and coreferring terms for each other in the context of sentences of the form ‘P corresponds to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andrew Newman (2002). The Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Predication. Cambridge University Press.score: 1452.0
    This work presents a version of the correspondence theory of truth based on Wittgenstein's Tractatus and Russell's theory of truth and discusses related metaphysical issues such as predication, facts, and propositions. Like Russell and one prominent interpretation of the Tractatus it assumes a realist view of universals. Part of the aim is to avoid Platonic propositions, and although sympathy with facts is maintained in the early chapters, the book argues that facts as real (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. D. J. O'Connor (1975). The Correspondence Theory of Truth. Hutchinson.score: 1248.0
  4. Gaetano Licata (2011). Truth and Facts: Rejection of the Slingshot Argument in Defence of the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Aracne.score: 1248.0
  5. Marian David, The Correspondence Theory of Truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 1236.0
    Narrowly speaking, the correspondence theory of truth is the view that truth is correspondence to a fact -- a view that was advocated by Russell and Moore early in the 20 th century. But the label is usually applied much more broadly to any view explicitly embracing the idea that truth consists in a relation to reality, i.e., that truth is a relational property involving a characteristic relation (to be specified) to some portion (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Marian David (2004). Don't Forget About the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (1):42 – 47.score: 1233.0
    Contra Lewis, it is argued that the correspondence theory is a genuine rival theory of truth: it goes beyond the redundancy theory; it competes with other theories of truth; it is aptly summarized by the slogan 'truth is correspondence to fact'; and it really is a theory of truth.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Alberto Vanzo (2008). A Correspondence Theory of Objects? On Kant's Notions of Truth, Object, and Actuality. History of Philosophy Quarterly 25 (3):259-275.score: 1227.0
    Ernst Cassirer claimed that Kant's notion of actual object presupposes the notion of truth. Therefore, Kant cannot define truth as the correspondence of a judgement with an actual object. In this paper, I discuss the relations between Kant's notions of truth, object, and actuality. I argue that's notion of actual object does not presuppose the notion of truth. I conclude that Kant can define truth as the correspondence of a judgement with an actual (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David Lewis (2001). Forget About the ‘Correspondence Theory of Truth’. Analysis 61 (272):275–280.score: 1224.0
    There is no distinct correspondence theory of truth, truth is correspondence to fact. If facts are taken to be true propositions, we wind up with just another version of the correspondence theory's ostensible competitor, the redundancy theory of truth. If instead facts are taken to be Armstrong's states of affairs, or Tractarian facts, or Mellor's _facta, we get a _truthmaker principle, that for every truth there is a truthmaker; something whose (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. D. Patterson (2003). What is a Correspondence Theory of Truth? Synthese 137 (3):421 - 444.score: 1224.0
    It is often thought that instances of the T-schema such as snow is white is true if and only if snow is white state correspondences between sentences andthe world, and that therefore such sentences play a crucial role in correspondence theories oftruth. I argue that this assumption trivializes the correspondence theory: even a disquotationaltheory of truth would be a correspondence theory on this conception. This discussionallows one to get clearer about what a correspondence (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Frank Hofmann, The Correspondence Theory of Truth.score: 1224.0
    Ever since the works of Alfred Tarski and Frank Ramsey, two views on truth have seemed very attractive to many people. On the one hand, the correspondence theory of truth seemed to be quite promising, mostly, perhaps, for its ability to accomodate a realistic attitude towards truth. On the other hand, a minimalist conception seemed appropriate since it made things so simple and unmysterious. So even though there are many more theories of truth around (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Richard Kenneth Atkins (2010). Pragmatic Scruples and the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Dialogue 49 (3):365-380.score: 1224.0
    ABSTRACT: Cheryl Misak has offered a pragmatic argument against a position she calls Scientific transcendentalists hold that truth is something different from what would be believed at the end of inquiry; more specifically, they adhere to a correspondence theory of truth. Misak thinks scientific transcendentalists thereby undermine the connection between truth and inquiry, for (a) pragmatically speaking, it adds nothing to truth and inquiry to ask whether what would be the results of sufficiently rigorous (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Paul Weingartner (1978). Brentano's Criticism of the Correspondence Theory of Truth and the Principle "Ens Et Verum Convertuntur". Grazer Philosophische Studien 5:183-195.score: 1224.0
    This paper investigates Brentano's criticism of the correspondence theory of truth within the context of a discussion of his ontological assumptions. Brentano's interpretation of the formula Veritas est adaequatio rei et intellectus and of the principle ens et verum convertuntur is shown to fit into the history of these principles and into modern interpretations like that of Tarski.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. James Danaher (2002). Toward a Postmodern Correspondence Theory of Truth. Sophia 41 (2):55-62.score: 1224.0
    The correspondence theory of truth no longer holds the privileged place it once held. In a postmodern world there simply does not appear to be any objective reality to which our ideas might correspond in order to be true. Thus, today other theories of truth have become popular. Most theists bemoan the loss of correspondence and muster arguments to oppose the postmodern perspective. This paper argues that even given the postmodern perspective of our age a (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Mario Bunge (2012). The Correspondence Theory of Truth. Semiotica 2012 (188):65-75.score: 1221.0
    Two concepts of truth as correspondence of ideas with facts are analyzed. One of them is the thought-external fact relation, and the other is the fact-proposition one. The two maps are then composed, and the resulting map is assumed to formalize the concept of truth as adequacy or correspondence of ideas to facts. Besides, some desiderata for a correspondence theory of partial truth are proposed. Finally, the truth criteria employed in science and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Herbert Keuth (1978). Tarski's Definition of Truth and the Correspondence Theory. Philosophy of Science 45 (3):420-430.score: 1203.0
    Tarski's definition of truth has rehabilitated the application of the word "true" to sentences of formalized languages. But a correspondence theory according to which a sentence is true if, And only if, It is related in the peculiar way of correspondence to the facts, Is incompatible with tarski's definition. Actually no theory of truth, Which claims to make proper assertions about sentences when calling them true, Is compatible with tarski's definition. Hence they all have (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Patricia Marino (2008). Toward a Modest Correspondence Theory of Truth: Predicates and Properties. Dialogue 47 (01):81-.score: 1134.0
    Correspondence theories are frequently charged with being either implausible -- metaphysically troubling and overly general -- or trivial -- collapsing into deflationism's "'P' is true iff P." Philip Kitcher argues for a "modest" correspondence theory, on which reference relations are causal relations, but there is no general theory of denotation. In this paper, I start by showing that, understood this way, "modest" theories are open to charges of triviality. I then offer a refinement of modesty, and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. R. Fumerton (2002). Realism and the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Rowman & Littlefield.score: 1068.0
    This book is a defense of realism about truth.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Ullin T. Place (1997). Linguistic Behaviorism and the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Behavior and Philosophy 25 (2):83 - 94.score: 1044.0
    Linguistic Behaviorism (Place, 1996) is an attempt to reclaim for the behaviorist perspective two disciplines, linguistics and linguistic philosophy, most of whose practitioners have been persuaded by Chomsky's (1959) Review of B. F. Skinner's (1957) "Verbal Behavior" that behaviorism has nothing useful to contribute to the study of language. It takes as axiomatic (a) that the functional unit of language is the sentence, and (b) that sentences are seldom repeated word-for-word, but are constructed anew on each occasion of utterance out (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Joseph Ratner (1935). The Correspondence Theory of Truth. Journal of Philosophy 32 (6):141-152.score: 1032.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Roy Wood Sellars (1941). A Correspondence Theory of Truth. Journal of Philosophy 38 (24):645-654.score: 1032.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jouni-Matti Kuukkanen (2007). Kuhn, the Correspondence Theory of Truth and Coherentist Epistemology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (3):555-566.score: 1032.0
    Kuhn argued against both the correspondence theory of truth and convergent realism. Although he likely misunderstood the nature of the correspondence theory, which it seems he wrongly believed to be an epistemic theory, Kuhn had an important epistemic point to make. He maintained that any assessment of correspondence between beliefs and reality is not possible, and therefore, the acceptance of beliefs and the presumption of their truthfulness has to be decided on the basis (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Lorenz Krüger (1995). Has the Correspondence Theory of Truth Been Refuted? From Gottlob Frege to Donald Davidson. European Journal of Philosophy 3 (2):157-172.score: 1032.0
  23. H. B. Acton (1934). The Correspondence Theory of Truth. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 35:177 - 194.score: 1032.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Richard Fumerton (2013). Alethic Pluralism and the Correspondence Theory of Truth. In Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding Pedersen & Cory D. Wright (eds.), Truth and Pluralism: Current Debates. Oxford University Press. 197.score: 1032.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Raymond Woller (2003). Newman, Andrew. The Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Predication. Review of Metaphysics 57 (1):167-168.score: 1032.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. A. N. Prior (1967). Correspondence Theory of Truth. In P. Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Vol. 2. Macmillan Publishing Co. &Amp; the Free Press.score: 1032.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. D. W. Hamlyn (1962). The Correspondence Theory of Truth. Philosophical Quarterly 12 (48):193-205.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Herbert Hochberg (2003). Review of Andrew Newman, The Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Predication. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2003 (1).score: 1020.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Hubert L. Dreyfus (2002). 10 How Heidegger Defends the Possibility of a Correspondence Theory of Truth with Respect to the Entities of Natural Science. In Hubert L. Dreyfus & Mark A. Wrathall (eds.), Heidegger Reexamined. Routledge. 4--219.score: 1020.0
  30. Matthew McGrath (2004). Review: The Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Predication. [REVIEW] Mind 113 (450):379-383.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Douglas Patterson (2004). Correspondence and Metaphysics: Andrew Newman's the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Inquiry 47 (5):490 – 504.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Gerald Vision (2003). Lest We Forget ‘the Correspondence Theory of Truth’. Analysis 63 (278):136–142.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Gonzalo Rodriguez-Pereyra (1998). Searle's Correspondence Theory of Truth and the Slingshot. Philosophical Quarterly 48 (193):513-522.score: 1020.0
  34. D. Liggins (2007). Review: Bare Facts and Naked Truths: A New Correspondence Theory of Truth. [REVIEW] Mind 116 (463):746-749.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Dorothy Grover (2004). The Correspondence Theory of Truth. International Philosophical Quarterly 44 (3):438-440.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. John Tietz (1993). Heidegger on Realism and the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Dialogue 32 (01):59-.score: 1020.0
  37. Alexander Miller (2006). Russell, Multiple Relations, and the Correspondence Theory of Truth. The Monist 89 (1):85-101.score: 1020.0
  38. Hugo Meynell (2009). Bare Facts and Naked Truths: A New Correspondence Theory of Truth. By George Englebretsen. Heythrop Journal 50 (3):524-525.score: 1020.0
  39. Robert Hanna (2006). Review: Underwood, Kant's Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Analysis and Critique of Anglo-American Alternatives. [REVIEW] Kantian Review 11 (1):136-138.score: 1020.0
  40. James M. Brown (1976). The Correspondence Theory of Truth. Philosophical Studies 25:338-340.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Patricia Marino (2008). This is a Postprint. For Citation Etc., Please See the Published Version" Toward a Modest Correspondence Theory of Truth: Predicates and Properties," Dialogue: The Canadian Philosophical Review 47 (2008), 81-102. [REVIEW] Philosophical Review 47:81-102.score: 1020.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Herbert E. Hendry (1977). "The Correspondence Theory of Truth," by D. J. O'Connor. Modern Schoolman 55 (1):92-95.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. John T. Wilcox (1986). Nietzsche Scholarship and “the Correspondence Theory of Truth”: The Danto Case. Nietzsche-Studien 15 (1):337.score: 1020.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. James R. Beebe (2003). Andrew Newman, The Correspondence Theory of Truth: An Essay on the Metaphysics of Predication Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 23 (3):195-197.score: 1020.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. G. Englebretsen (2006). Bare Facts and Truth: An Essay on the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Ashgate Publishing Company.score: 1020.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. G. A. Kursanov (1969). On Contemporary Forms of the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Russian Studies in Philosophy 8 (1):26-44.score: 1020.0
    In a number of contemporary writings on epistemology, the theory of coherence is contrasted to the correspondence theory of truth, according to which the logical truth of forms of cognition is determined by correspondence to their external referent: material reality, an object, a fact, an event, etc. This counterposition makes a certain kind of sense but, as we shall see, the coherence and correspondence theories are not mutually exclusive.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Gaetano Licata (2010). The Slingshot Argument Troubles for the Correspondence Theory of Truth. Giornale di Metafisica 32 (1):53-82.score: 1020.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000