Search results for 'de re and de dicto' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  39
    Ezra Keshet (2010). Split Intensionality: A New Scope Theory of de Re and de Dicto. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (4):251-283.
    The traditional scope theory of intensionality (STI) (see Russell 1905; Montague 1973; Ladusaw 1977; Ogihara 1992, 1996; Stowell 1993) is simple, elegant, and, for the most part, empirically adequate. However, a few quite troubling counterexamples to this theory have lead researchers to propose alternatives, such as positing null situation pronouns (Percus 2000) or actuality operators (Kamp 1971; Cresswell 1990) in the syntax of natural language. These innovative theories do correct the undergeneration of the original scope theory, but at a cost: (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2. Emar Maier (2009). Presupposing Acquaintance: A Unified Semantics for de Dicto, de Re and de Se Belief Reports. Linguistics and Philosophy 32 (5):429--474.
    This paper deals with the semantics of de dicto , de re and de se belief reports. First, I flesh out in some detail the established, classical theories that assume syntactic distinctions between all three types of reports. I then propose a new, unified analysis, based on two ideas discarded by the classical theory. These are: (i) modeling the de re/de dicto distinction as a difference in scope, and (ii) analyzing de se as merely a special case of (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  3. Sean Crawford (2012). De Re and De Dicto Explanation of Action. Philosophia 40 (4):783-798.
    This paper argues for an account of the relation between thought ascription and the explanation of action according to which de re ascriptions and de dicto ascriptions of thought each form the basis for two different kinds of action explanations, nonrationalizing and rationalizing ones. The claim that de dicto ascriptions explain action is familiar and virtually beyond dispute; the claim that that de re ascriptions are explanatory of action, however, is not at all familiar and indeed has mostly (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4. Adèle Mercier (1998). On Communication-Based De Re Thought, Commitments De Dicto and Word Individuation. In Robert Stainton & Kumiko Murasagi (eds.), Philosophy and Linguistics. Westview Press 85--111.
    Provides an account of how necessary subjective syntactic investments on the part of speakers affect the semantic contents of their words and the possibilities for their thought-contents.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  14
    Andrzej Cieśluk (2009). De re i de dicto. Diametros 22:134-150.
    The aim of the article is to systematize the de re/de dicto distinctions that are most frequently used in philosophy. The paper highlights the main contexts in which these distinctions may be found and their syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic definitions. The article consists of four points, which are discussed in turn: 1) the principal moments in the early history of the distinction between de re and de dicto; 2) the main theoretical contexts of this distinction; 3) contemporary attempts (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  18
    Michael Wreen (1986). Plantinga on the De Dicto/De Re Distinction. Grazer Philosophische Studien 27:49-55.
    Over the past fifteen years or so the distinction between de diclo and de re modality has been revived and pressed into service in a number of areas of philosophy. In "Plantinga on the De Dicto/De Re Distinction" it is argued that one prominent argument/persuasion advanced for making the distinction in the first place is unsound. The argument for making the distinction attempts to elicit rational acceptance of it by clearly illustrating it with a proposition that is false when (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  38
    Manuel Rebuschi & Tero Tulenheimo (2011). Between de Dicto and de Re: De Objecto Attitudes. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):828-838.
    Hintikka's second generation epistemic logic introduces a syntactic device allowing to express independence relations between certain logical constants. De re knowledge attributions can be reformulated in terms of quantifier independence, but the reformulation does not extend to non-factive attitudes like belief. There, formulae with independent quantifiers serve to express a new type of attitude, intermediate between de dicto and de re, called ‘de objecto’: in each possible world compatible with the agent's belief, there is an individual with the specified (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  50
    Ken Taylor (2002). De Re And De Dicto: Against The Conventional Wisdom. Noûs 36 (s16):225-265.
    Conventional wisdom has it that there is a class of attitude ascriptions such that in making an ascription of that sort, the ascriber undertakes a commitment to specify the contents of the ascribee’s head in what might be called a notionally sensitive, ascribee-centered way. In making such an ascription, the ascriber is supposed to undertake a commitment to specify the modes of presentation, concepts or notions under which the ascribee cognizes the objects (and properties) that her beliefs are about. Consequently, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  37
    Ulrich Nortmann (2002). The Logic of Necessity in Aristotle--An Outline of Approaches to the Modal Syllogistic, Together with a General Account of de Dicto - and de Re -Necessity. History and Philosophy of Logic 23 (4):253-265.
    This article investigates the prospect of giving de dicto- and de re-necessity a uniform treatment. The historical starting point is a puzzle raised by Aristotle's claim, advanced in one of the modal chapters of his Prior Analytics, that universally privative apodeictic premises simply convert. As regards the Prior and the Posterior Analytics, the data suggest a representation of propositions of the type in question by doubly modally qualified formulae of modal predicate logic that display a necessity operator in two (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  6
    Tero Tulenheimo Manuel Rebuschi (2011). Between de Dicto and de Re: De Objecto Attitudes. Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):828-838.
    Hintikka's second generation epistemic logic introduces a syntactic device allowing to express independence relations between certain logical constants. De re knowledge attributions can be reformulated in terms of quantifier independence, but the reformulation does not extend to non‐factive attitudes like belief. There, formulae with independent quantifiers serve to express a new type of attitude, intermediate between de dicto and de re, called ‘de objecto’: in each possible world compatible with the agent's belief, there is an individual with the specified (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Marie Duží (2000). De Re Vs. De Dicto. Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 7 (4):365-378.
    The paper solves the problems connected with the occurrences of expressions in the de re or de dicto supposition. It is shown that some expressions, e.g. definite descriptions, that are seemingly ambiguous are in no way ambiguous, they denote in all the contexts one and the same “thing” and have a precise definite meaning which is best explicated by the TIL logical construction. What differs is only the supposition in which they occur. The precise definition of the distinction between (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Marie Duží (2001). Homonymie, de Dicto/de Re a Význam. Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 8 (3):235-251.
    The paper completes a “serial” of my contributions to the hot problems of current semantics, i.e. propositional / notional attitudes, de dicto / de re, synonymy, homonymy, equivalence, meaning, sense, denotation, reference. Two kinds of believing, knowing, etc. are distinguished, namely implicit believing of an ideal believer and explicit believing of a logical / mathematical ignorant . A special case of a week, hidden homonymy is considered and we show that when claiming two expressions being synonymous we have to (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Kit Fine (1978). ModelTtheory for Modal Logic. Part I — The de Re/de Dicto Distinction. Journal of Philosophical Logic 7 (1):125 - 156.
  14.  10
    Márta Ujvári (2012). Prior's Fable and the Limits of de Re Possibility. Synthese 188 (3):459-467.
    Prior's hitherto unpublished "Fable of the Four Preachers" illuminates the connection of the metaphysical issues of trans-world identity with moral trans-world continuity. The paper shows Prior's position with regard to genuine de re temporal possibility of individuals on the basis of chapter VIII of his Papers on Time and Tense. His position is that radical coming-into-being is not a genuine de re temporal possibility of individuals since there is no identifiable individual, before birth, who could be the subject of such (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  48
    G. W. Fitch (1981). Names and the 'de Re — de Dicto' Distinction. Philosophical Studies 39 (1):25 - 34.
  16.  19
    Saul A. Kripke (1985). Review: Kit Fine, Model Theory for Modal Logic. Part I--The de Re/De Dicto Distinction; Kit Fine, Model Theory for Modal Logic--Part II. The Elimination of de Re Modality; Kit Fine, Model Theory for Modal Logic--Part III. Existence and Predication. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (4):1083-1093.
  17. Thomas McKay & Michael Nelson (2005). The de Re/de Dicto Distinction. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved 15:2010.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  22
    James D. Carney (1983). Names and the de Re/de Dicto Distinction. Philosophia 12 (3-4):357-361.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  14
    Richard Aquila (1981). De Re, de Dicto, and Naturalism. Journal of Philosophy 78 (11):718-719.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Marie Duží (2001). Znovu o homonymii, de re / de dicto a významu. Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 8 (3):409-411.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. Saul A. Kripke (1985). Fine Kit. Model Theory for Modal Logic. Part I—the de Re/de Dicto Distinction. Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 7 , Pp. 125–156.Fine Kit. Model Theory for Modal Logic—Part II. The Elimination of de Re Modality. Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 7 , Pp. 277–306.Fine Kit. Model Theory for Modal Logic—Part III. Existence and Predication. Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 10 , Pp. 293–307. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 50 (4):1083-1093.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Luis Vega Reñón (2011). De dicto/de re. In Luis Vega and Paula Olmos (ed.), Compendio de Lógica, Argumentación y Retórica. Editorial Trotta
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  1
    Gérold Stahl (1976). Quelques relations entre temporalité de re et temporalité de dicto et leur extension aux modalités. Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 166 (2):165 - 178.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. M. Nida-Rümelin (1992). De-re-versus de-dicto-Bewertungen der Existenz von Personen: eine anomalie der Ex-post-facto-Beurteilung von Entscheidungen. Conceptus: Zeitschrift Fur Philosophie 26 (68-69):97-105.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Roderick Chisholm (1976). Knowledge and Belief: 'De Dicto' and 'de Re'. [REVIEW] Philosophical Studies 29 (1):1 - 20.
  26. Ernest Sosa (1970). Propositional Attitudes De Dicto and De Re. Journal of Philosophy 67 (21):883-896.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  27. Ernest Sosa (1971). Sosa on Propositional Attitudes de Dicto and de Re: Rejoinder to Hintikka. Journal of Philosophy 68 (16):498-501.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  31
    Nathan Salmon (1997). Is de Re Belief Reducible to de Dicto? Canadian Journal of Philosophy 27 (sup1):85-110.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  29. Alvin Plantinga (1969). De Re Et de Dicto. Noûs 3 (3):235-258.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  30.  4
    Jimmy Plourde (2015). Autonomie de la logique et fondement des modalités de re syntaxique et de dicto sur la modalité de re ontique. Philosophiques 42 (2):367-373.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  31
    Pavel Tichý (1978). De Dicto and de Re. Philosophia 8 (1):1-16.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  32.  69
    Baruch A. Brody (1972). De Re and de Dicto Interpretations of Modal Logic or a Return to an Aristotelean Essentialism. Philosophia 2 (1-2):117-136.
  33.  46
    A. N. Prior (1952). Modality de Dicto and Modality de Re. Theoria 18 (3):174-180.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34.  9
    Duží Marie (2000). De Re Vs. De Dicto. Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 7 (4):365-378.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  37
    Justin Broackes (1986). Belief de Re and de Dicto. Philosophical Quarterly 36 (144):374-383.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  5
    Kenneth A. Taylor (2002). De Re and De Dicto: Against the Conventional Wisdom. Noûs 36 (s16):225 - 265.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  26
    Jaakko Hintikka (1971). Sosa on Propositional Attitudes de Dicto and de Re. Journal of Philosophy 68 (16):489-497.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  10
    Roland J. Teske (1992). William of Auvergne on De Re and De Dicto Necessity. Modern Schoolman 69 (2):111-121.
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  10
    Duží Marie (2001). Homonymie, de Dicto/de Re a Význam. Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 8 (3):235-251.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  33
    J. N. Mohanty (1982). Husserlian Phenomenology and the de Re and de Dicto Intentionalities. Research in Phenomenology 12 (1):1-12.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  29
    Richard Campbell (1964). Modality de Dicto and de Re. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 42 (3):345 – 359.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  16
    Joseph L. Camp Jr (1971). Plantinga on de Dicto and de Re. Noûs 5 (2):215-225.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  6
    Duží Marie (2001). Znovu o Homonymii, de Dicto/de Re a Významu. Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 8 (4):409-411.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Jaegwon Kim (1997). Chisholm on Intentionality: De Se, de Re, and de Dicto. In Lewis Edwin Hahn (ed.), The Philosophy of Roderick M. Chisholm. Chicago: Open Court
  45.  15
    Thomas Jager (1987). De Re and de Dicto. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29 (1):81-90.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  6
    Martin Bell (1982). The "De Dicto/De Re" Distinction in Relation to Actions. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 83:159 - 173.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  1
    A. R. Turquette (1955). Review: A. N. Prior, Modality de Dicto and Modality de Re. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (2):167-167.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. G. Cora (1988). 'De Re'and'de Dicto'-Modal Reference and Possibility in Aristotle. Verifiche: Rivista Trimestrale di Scienze Umane 17 (1-2):3-60.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. R. E. Jennings (1978). "De re" and "de dicto beliefs". Logique Et Analyse 21 (84):451.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. A. R. Turquette (1955). Prior A. N.. Modality de Dicto and Modality de Re. Theoria , Vol. 18 , Pp. 174–180. Journal of Symbolic Logic 20 (2):167.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000