Search results for 'dialogue' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Christian-Buddhist Dialogue (2004). Dialogue and Universausm No. 1-2/2004. Dialogue and Universalism 14 (1-4):25.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Secular Universalist Dialogue & A. Multifaith (2003). Dialogue and Universal1sm No. 5/2003. Dialogue and Universalism 13 (5-8).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Inter-Religious Dialogue (2001). Religious Dialogue. In Gbola Aderibigbe & Deji Ayegboyin (eds.), Religion and Social Ethics. National Association for the Study of Religions and Education (Nasred) 15.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  69
    Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod (2004). Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.
    Traditional mechanistic accounts of language processing derive almost entirely from the study of monologue. Yet, the most natural and basic form of language use is dialogue. As a result, these accounts may only offer limited theories of the mechanisms that underlie language processing in general. We propose a mechanistic account of dialogue, the interactive alignment account, and use it to derive a number of predictions about basic language processes. The account assumes that, in dialogue, the linguistic representations (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   84 citations  
  5. Ulrich Diehl (2005). On the Art of Intercultural Dialogue. Some Forms, Conditions and Structures. In P. N. Liechtenstein & Ch M. Gueye (eds.), Peace and Intercultural Dialogue. Universitätsverlag Winter
    This essay begins with the claim that intercultural dialogue is an art rather than a science or technique and it attempts to point out what it takes to learn the art of intercultural dialogue. In PART ONE some basic forms of intercultural dialogue are presented which correlate to some basic forms of human life, such as family, politics, economy, science, art and religion. Also a few common traits about how intercultural dialogue is practised today are specified. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  12
    Napoleon Ono Imaah (2006). Synergy and Dialogue. Dialogue and Universalism 16 (11/12):57-67.
    This paper acknowledges the fact human beings are social animals, as they tend to live in well-organized societies. However, human population expansion explodes into internal implosions that continue to wreck havoc globally on the social, economic, political, architectural, and aesthetic environments. To harness the universal territorial imperatives, of contending components harmoniously, the world requires synergy and dialogue.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  21
    Tineke A. Abma, Bert Molewijk & Guy A. M. Widdershoven (2009). Good Care in Ongoing Dialogue. Improving the Quality of Care Through Moral Deliberation and Responsive Evaluation. Health Care Analysis 17 (3):217-235.
    Recently, moral deliberation within care institutions is gaining more attention in medical ethics. Ongoing dialogues about ethical issues are considered as a vehicle for quality improvement of health care practices. The rise of ethical conversation methods can be understood against the broader development within medical ethics in which interaction and dialogue are seen as alternatives for both theoretical or individual reflection on ethical questions. In other disciplines, intersubjectivity is also seen as a way to handle practical problems, and methodologies (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   19 citations  
  8.  32
    Seung Chul Kim (2015). Śūnyatā and Kokoro: Science–Religion Dialogue in the Japanese Context. Zygon 50 (1):155-171.
    When we read books or essays about the dialogue between “religion and science,” or when we attend conferences on the theme of “religion and science,” we cannot avoid the impression that they actually are dealing, almost without exception, not with a dialogue between “religion and science,” but with a dialogue between “Christianity and science.” This could easily be affirmed by looking at the major publications in this field. But how can the science–religion dialogue take place in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  9.  30
    Domingo García-Marzá (2005). Trust and Dialogue: Theoretical Approaches to Ethics Auditing. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 57 (3):209 - 219.
    . The aim of this paper is to put forward an ethical framework for the conceptualization and development of ethics audits, here understood as a catalyst for company dialogue and in general, for management of ethics in the company. Ethics auditing is understood as the opportunity and agreement to devise a system to inform on ethical corporate behavior. This system essentially aims to increase the transparency and credibility of the companys commitment to ethics. At the same time, the process (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   23 citations  
  10.  5
    Magdalena Kacprzak & Olena Yaskorska (2014). Dialogue Protocols for Formal Fallacies. Argumentation 28 (3):349-369.
    This paper presents a dialogue system called Lorenzen–Hamblin Natural Dialogue (LHND), in which participants can commit formal fallacies and have a method of both identifying and withdrawing formal fallacies. It therefore provides a tool for the dialectical evaluation of force of argument when players advance reasons which are deductively incorrect. The system is inspired by Hamblin’s formal dialectic and Lorenzen’s dialogical logic. It offers uniform protocols for Hamblin’s and Lorenzen’s dialogues and adds a protocol for embedding them. This (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  11.  20
    Jon Burchell & Joanne Cook (2013). Sleeping with the Enemy? Strategic Transformations in Business–NGO Relationships Through Stakeholder Dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics 113 (3):505-518.
    Campaigning activities of non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have increased public awareness and concern regarding the alleged unethical and environmentally damaging practices of many major multinational companies. Companies have responded by developing corporate social responsibility strategies to demonstrate their commitment to both the societies within which they function and to the protection of the natural environment. This has often involved a move towards greater transparency in company practice and a desire to engage with stakeholders, often including many of the campaign organisations that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  12.  15
    Kathleen Rehbein, Jeanne M. Logsdon & Harry J. Buren (2013). Corporate Responses to Shareholder Activists: Considering the Dialogue Alternative. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 112 (1):137-154.
    This empirical study examines corporate responses to activist shareholder groups filing social-policy shareholder resolutions. Using resource dependency theory as our conceptual framing, we identify some of the drivers of corporate responses to shareholder activists. This study departs from previous studies by including a fourth possible corporate response, engaging in dialogue. Dialogue, an alternative to shareholder resolutions filed by activists, is a process in which corporations and activist shareholder groups mutually agree to engage in ongoing negotiations to deal with (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  13. Joseph Tham (2014). A Catholic Reflects on Dialogue in the Abortion Debate. Journal of Clinical Research and Bioethics 5 (1):168.
    The recent comments by Pope Francis on abortion have caused a bit of a stir in the media. His nuanced responses are often lost in the media, and also by advocates on both sides of the abortion debate. While the Catholic position against abortion is common knowledge, this does not preclude an openness to dialogue. This article looks at some recent attempts at dialogue on the controversial topic of abortion. The first example comes from a book that surveys (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  13
    Dominique Knutsen, Christine Ros & Ludovic Le Bigot (2016). Generating References in Naturalistic Face‐to‐Face and Phone‐Mediated Dialog Settings. Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (3).
    During dialog, references are presented, accepted, and potentially reused. Two experiments were conducted to examine reuse in a naturalistic setting. In Experiment 1, where the participants interacted face to face, self-presented references and references accepted through verbatim repetition were reused more. Such biases persisted after the end of the interaction. In Experiment 2, where the participants interacted over the phone, reference reuse mainly depended on whether the participant could see the landmarks being referred to, although this bias seemed to be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  33
    Tasos Kazepides (2012). Education as Dialogue. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (9):913-925.
    The purpose of this paper is to show that genuine dialogue is a refined human achievement and probably the most valid criterion on the basis of which we can evaluate educational or social policy and practice. The paper explores the prerequisites of dialogue in the language games, the common certainties, the rules of logic and the variety of common virtues; defends dialogue as a normative concept and interprets the principles of dialogue as extensions of its prerequisite (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  16. Antje Jackelen & Philip Hefner (2004). Concluding Dialogue: Challenging the Past, Grasping the Future. Zygon 39 (2):401-412.
    . A dialogue between the outgoing and incoming directors of the Zygon Center for Religion and Science took place as part of the inaugural symposium. In their conversation they speak of the past and present challenges and goals of the Center, outline what is foremost in their minds, and offer glimpses into what they see as the Center’s priorities for future work.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  55
    Mitchell Miller (2012). Review Essays-Dialectic and Dialogue-by Dmitri Nikulin. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 32 (1):177.
    Dmitri Nikulin extends his earlier study of oral dialogue (On Dialogue [Lexington, 2006]) to an investigation of dialectic, moving from a narrative of its development in Plato and the history of philosophy (ch.s 1-3) through a renewed phenomenological account of oral dialogue (ch.s 4-5) to a critique, from the perspective of oral dialogue, of the limitations of written dialectic (ch. 6). I take up some of the provocations of his bold and open-ended argument. Does his own (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  47
    Alain Lecomte & Myriam Quatrini (2011). Figures of Dialogue: A View From Ludics. Synthese 183 (S1):59-85.
    In this paper, we study dialogue as a game, but not only in the sense in which there would exist winning strategies and a priori rules. Dialogue is not governed by game rules like for chess or other games, since even if we start from a priori rules, it is always possible to play with them, provided that some invariant properties are preserved. An important discovery of Ludics is that such properties may be expressed in geometrical terms. The (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  19.  31
    T. J. M. Bench-Capon, T. Geldard & P. H. Leng (2000). A Method for the Computational Modelling of Dialectical Argument with Dialogue Games. Artificial Intelligence and Law 8 (2-3):233-254.
    In this paper we describe a method for the specification of computationalmodels of argument using dialogue games. The method, which consists ofsupplying a set of semantic definitions for the performatives making upthe game, together with a state transition diagram, is described in full.Its use is illustrated by some examples of varying complexity, includingtwo complete specifications of particular dialogue games, Mackenzie's DC,and the authors' own TDG. The latter is also illustrated by a fully workedexample illustrating all the features of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  20.  4
    André Habisch, Lorenzo Patelli, Matteo Pedrini & Christoph Schwartz (2011). Different Talks with Different Folks: A Comparative Survey of Stakeholder Dialog in Germany, Italy, and the U.S. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 100 (3):381 - 551.
    Although theoretical underpinnings of stakeholder dialog (SD) have been extensively discussed in the extant literature, there is a lack of empirical studies presenting evidence on the SD initiatives undertaken by firms. In this article, we provide information about 294 SD initiatives collected through a content analysis of the sustainability reports published by large firms in Germany, Italy, and the U. S. In addition to a country-based description of the different forms, stakeholder categories, and topics of the SD initiatives, we explore (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  21.  86
    Paul Piwek (2011). Dialogue Structure and Logical Expressivism. Synthese 183 (S1):33-58.
    This paper aims to develop the implications of logical expressivism for a theory of dialogue coherence. I proceed in three steps. Firstly, certain structural properties of cooperative dialogue are identified. Secondly, I describe a variant of the multi-agent natural deduction calculus that I introduced in Piwek (J Logic Lang Inf 16(4):403–421, 2007 ) and demonstrate how it accounts for the aforementioned structures. Thirdly, I examine how the aforementioned system can be used to formalise an expressivist account of logical (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  23
    Marianne Benard, Huib de Vriend, Paul van Haperen & Volkert Beekman (2010). Science and Society in Dialogue About Marker Assisted Selection. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (4):317-329.
    Analysis of a European Union funded biotechnology project on plant genomics and marker assisted selection in Solanaceous crops shows that the organization of a dialogue between science and society to accompany technological innovations in plant breeding faces practical challenges. Semi-structured interviews with project participants and a survey among representatives of consumer and other non-governmental organizations show that the professed commitment to dialogue on science and biotechnology is rather shallow and has had limited application for all involved. Ultimately, other (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23.  28
    J. Anthony Blair (1998). The Limits of the Dialogue Model of Argument. Argumentation 12 (2):325-339.
    The paper's thesis is that dialogue is not an adequate model for all types of argument. The position of Walton is taken as the contrary view. The paper provides a set of descriptions of dialogues in which arguments feature in the order of the increasing complexity of the argument presentation at each turn of the dialogue, and argues that when arguments of great complexity are traded, the exchanges between arguers are turns of a dialogue only in an (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  24.  27
    Martin Parker & Gordon Pearson (2005). Capitalism and its Regulation: A Dialogue on Business and Ethics. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 60 (1):91 - 101.
    This dialogue engages with the ethics of politics of capitalism, and enacts a debate between two participants who have divergent views on these matters. Beginning with a discussion concerning definitions of capitalism, it moves on to cover issues concerning our different understandings of the costs and benefits of global capitalist systems. This then leads into a debate about the nature and purposes of regulation, in terms of whether regulation is intended to make competition work better for consumers, or to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  25.  25
    Marianna Papastephanou (2012). Crossing the Divide Within Continental Philosophy: Reconstruction, Deconstruction, Dialogue and Education. Studies in Philosophy and Education 31 (2):153-170.
    In this article I explore some points of convergence between Habermas and Derrida that revolve around the intersection of ethical and epistemological issues in dialogue. After some preliminary remarks on how dialogue and language are viewed by Habermas and Derrida as standpoints for departing from the philosophy of consciousness and from logocentric metaphysics, I cite the main points of a classroom dialogue in order to illustrate the way in which the ideas of Habermas and Derrida are sometimes (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  24
    W. J. Morgan & Alexandre Guilherme (2012). I and Thou: The Educational Lessons of Martin Buber's Dialogue with the Conflicts of His Times. Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (9):979-996.
    Most of what has been written about Buber and education tend to be studies of two kinds: theoretical studies of his philosophical views on education, and specific case studies that aim at putting theory into practice. The perspective taken has always been to hold a dialogue with Buber's works in order to identify and analyse critically Buber's views and, in some cases, to put them into practice; that is, commentators dialogue with the text. In this article our aims (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  20
    D. V. Nikulin (2010). Dialectic and Dialogue. Stanford University Press.
    In the beginning : dialogue and dialectic in Plato -- Dialectic : via antiqua -- Dialectic : via moderna -- Dialogue : a systematic outlook -- Dialogue : interruption -- Against writing -- (Dialectical) conclusion.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  28.  23
    Douglas N. Walton (1989). Dialogue Theory for Critical Thinking. Argumentation 3 (2):169-184.
    A general outline of a theory of reasoned dialogue is presented as an underlying basis of critical analysis of a text of argument discourse. This theory is applied to the analysis of informal fallacies by showing how textual evidence can be brought to bear in argument reconstruction. Several basic types of dialogue are identified and described, but the persuasive type of dialogue is emphasized as being of key importance to critical thinking theory.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  29.  17
    Gordon Pearson & Martin Parker (2001). The Relevance of Ancient Greeks to Modern Business? A Dialogue on Business and Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 31 (4):341 - 353.
    What follows is a dialogue, in the Platonic sense, concerning the justifications for "business ethics" as a vehicle for asking questions about the values of modern business organisations. The protagonists are the authors, Gordon Pearson – a pragmatist and sceptic where business ethics is concerned – and Martin Parker – a sociologist and idealist who wishes to be able to ask ethical questions of business. By the end of the dialogue we come to no agreement on the necessity (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  30.  12
    Shanta Premawardhana (2011). GREED AS VIOLENCE: Methodological Challenges in Interreligious Dialogue on the Ethics of the Global Financial Crisis. Journal of Religious Ethics 39 (2):223-245.
    The current financial crisis is one rooted not in recent deregulation but in the breaking of ancient (religious) laws, and this crisis is one of many ethical problems today that have religious roots. The tone of this essay is informed by a document from the World Council of Churches, which affirms "greed as violence" and that Christians do not have all the answers to the problem of greed; therefore, Christians need to seek solutions with other religious communities. Furthermore, religious leaders, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  61
    Paul Piwek (2007). Meaning and Dialogue Coherence: A Proof-Theoretic Investigation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):403-421.
    This paper presents a novel proof-theoretic account of dialogue coherence. It focuses on an abstract class of cooperative information-oriented dialogues and describes how their structure can be accounted for in terms of a multi-agent hybrid inference system that combines natural deduction with information transfer and observation. We show how certain dialogue structures arise out of the interplay between the inferential roles of logical connectives (i.e., sentence semantics), a rule for transferring information between agents, and a rule for information (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  32. Raymond Kolcaba (2000). Loss of the World: A Philosophical Dialogue. [REVIEW] Ethics and Information Technology 2 (1):3-9.
    Humanity has begun to move from the natural world intothe cyber world. Issues surrounding this mentalmigration are debated in philosophical dialogue. Thelead character is Becket Geist, a romantic philosopherwith views tempered by 20th century science. He openswith a monologue in which he argues that loss of theworld in exchange for the cyber world is dark andinevitable. His chief adversary is Fortran McCyborg,a cyborg with leanings toward Scottish philosophy. The moderating force is Nonette Naturski who championsnaturalism, conservation of humanist ideals, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  24
    Yiftach J. H. Fehige (2010). The "Art of Dialogue" and the Christian-Jewish Encounter. A First Approach. Jahrbuch für Religionsphilosophie 9:67-93.
    In this paper I raise awareness of a crucial blind spot in scholarship on the Christian-Jewish dialogue. The main argument of the paper is that a closer examination of the dialogue form is necessary in order to assess the tenability of Christian-Jewish dialogue. Despite the widespread talk and intensive scholarship about the Jewish-Christian dialogue two things remain unclear: what concept of dialogue is presupposed; what makes the dialogue form appropriate for the Christian-Jewish encounter. This (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  34.  9
    Simon Goldhill (ed.) (2008). The End of Dialogue in Antiquity. Cambridge University Press.
    'Dialogue' was invented as a written form in democratic Athens and made a celebrated and popular literary and philosophical style by Plato. Yet it almost completely disappeared in the Christian empire of late antiquity. This book, the first general and systematic study of the genre in antiquity, asks: who wrote dialogues and why? Why did dialogue no longer attract writers in the later period in the same way? Investigating dialogue goes to the heart of the central issues (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  3
    Sara Greco (forthcoming). Using Argumentative Tools to Understand Inner Dialogue. Argumentation:1-28.
    The starting point of this paper is the acknowledgement that individual reasoning, understood as inner dialogue, and social argumentation, albeit they are two different phenomena, share some similarities. On this basis, this paper sets out to apply instruments from argumentation theory to inner dialogue in order to better explain it. Within this framework, some limitations to the study of inner dialogue are also discussed; and methodological suggestions are provided in order to grasp what could be considered data (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  11
    Josep M. Lozano & Alfons Sauquet (1999). Integrating Business and Ethical Values Through Practitioner Dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics 22 (3):203 - 217.
    In practice, the relationship between business and ethics is not well-settled. In the past, organisations have developed an interest in setting value charts but this has been approached from a purely managerial perspective following the momentum and interest aroused by research on organisational cultures. Although interest in managing organisational cultures has slowly died down, for both theoretical and practical reasons we argue that there are feasible ways to explore values as part of an organisational culture. Indeed it is our claim (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  37.  7
    Tangming Yuan, David Moore & Alec Grierson (2003). Computational Agents as a Test-Bed to Study the Philosophical Dialogue Model "DE": A Development of Mackenzie's DC. Informal Logic 23 (3):263-284.
    This paper reports research concerning a suitable dialogue model for human computer debate. In particular, we consider the adoption of Moore's (1993) utilization of Mackenzie's (1979) game DC, means of using computational agents as the test-bed to facilitate evaluation of the proposed model, and means of using the evaluation results as motivation to further develop a dialogue model, which can prevent fallacious argument and common errors. It is anticipated that this work will contribute toward the development of human (...)
    Direct download (14 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  38.  4
    Jacky Visser (forthcoming). Speech Acts in a Dialogue Game Formalisation of Critical Discussion. Argumentation:1-22.
    In this paper a dialogue game for critical discussion is developed. The dialogue game is a formalisation of the ideal discussion model that is central to the pragma-dialectical theory of argumentation. The formalisation is intended as a preparatory step to facilitate the development of computational tools to support the pragma-dialectical study of argumentation. An important dimension of the pragma-dialectical discussion model is the role played by speech acts. The central issue addressed in this paper is how the speech (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  17
    Peter Cramer (2016). Story Problems: Where Do the Agonists of the Dialogue Model of Argument Interact? Argumentation 30 (2):129-144.
    When discussing dialogue, argumentation researchers rarely draw the distinction between the story world and interactional world. While mediators often help to shape the interactions among agonists in the emerging flow of spoken discourse, writers of postulated dialogues narrate them, constructing a story world that depicts the agonists, depicts their utterances and their circumstances. In this paper, I ask where the agonists of the dialogue model of argument interact, and I show that they often interact in the story world (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  11
    Roderic A. Girle (2016). Proof and Dialogue in Aristotle. Argumentation 30 (3):289-316.
    Jan Łukasiewicz’s analysis of Aristotle’s syllogism drew attention to the nature of syllogisms as conditionals rather than premise-conclusion arguments. His further idea that syllogisms should be understood as theorems of an axiom system seems a step too far for many logicians. But there is evidence to suggest that Aristotle’s syllogism was to regularise some of the steps made in ‘dialogue games.’ This way of seeing the syllogism is explored in the framework of modern formal dialogue systems. A modern (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  18
    Maya Wardeh, Trevor Bench-Capon & Frans Coenen (2009). Padua: A Protocol for Argumentation Dialogue Using Association Rules. [REVIEW] Artificial Intelligence and Law 17 (3):183-215.
    We describe PADUA, a protocol designed to support two agents debating a classification by offering arguments based on association rules mined from individual datasets. We motivate the style of argumentation supported by PADUA, and describe the protocol. We discuss the strategies and tactics that can be employed by agents participating in a PADUA dialogue. PADUA is applied to a typical problem in the classification of routine claims for a hypothetical welfare benefit. We particularly address the problems that arise from (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  13
    Bruce Drake, Kristi Yuthas & Jesse F. Dillard (2000). It'sonly Words -- Impacts of Information Technology on Moral Dialogue. Journal of Business Ethics 23 (1):41-59.
    New forms of information technology, such as email, webpages and groupware, are being rapidly adopted. Intended to improve efficiency and effectiveness, these technologies also have the potential to radically alter the way people communicate in organizations. The effects can be positive or negative. This paper explores how technology can encourage or discourage moral dialogue -- communication that is open, honest, and respectful of participants. It develops a framework that integrates formal properties of ideal moral discourse, based on Habermas' theory (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43. A. Guilherme & W. John Morgan (2010). Martin Buber: Dialogue and the Concept of the Other. Pastoral Review.
    Martin Buber (1878-1965) is one of the most significant existentialist philosophers of the twentieth century and a leading scholar of the Hasidic tradition in Judaism; even more important for this article is that Buber is considered by many to be the philosopher of dialogue par excellence. This article expounds Buber’s conception of dialogue and its implications for our conception of the Other.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  36
    Douglas Walton & David Godden (2005). Persuasion Dialogue in Online Dispute Resolution. Artificial Intelligence and Law 13 (2):273-295.
    In this paper we show how dialogue-based theories of argumentation can contribute to the construction of effective systems of dispute resolution. Specifically we consider the role of persuasion in online dispute resolution by showing how persuasion dialogues can be functionally embedded in negotiation dialogues, and how negotiation dialogues can shift to persuasion dialogues. We conclude with some remarks on how persuasion dialogues might be modelled is such a way as to allow them to be implemented in a mechanical or (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  45.  24
    Jeanne Cornillon & Duska Rosenberg (2004). Dialogue Organisation in Argumentative Debates. AI and Society 19 (1):48-64.
    This paper presents a conceptual framework for the study of social intelligence in a real-life environment. It is focussed on the dialogue organisation in argumentation, in particular how our understanding of dialogue phenomena in mediated communication may help us to support natural interaction in classroom debates. Dialogue organisation is explored in terms of the cohesive structure of dialogue that emerges as the result of information maintenance and change, specified locally by the adjacency pair and turn-taking, and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  9
    Raquel Fernández & Ulle Endriss (2007). Abstract Models for Dialogue Protocols. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (2):121-140.
    We examine a variety of dialogue protocols, taking inspiration from two fields: natural language dialogue modelling and multiagent systems. In communicative interaction, one can identify different features that may increase the complexity of the dialogue structure. This motivates a hierarchy of abstract models for protocols that takes as a starting point protocols based on deterministic finite automata. From there, we proceed by looking at particular examples that justify either an enrichment or a restriction of the initial model.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  11
    Christoph Lumer (1988). The Disputation ? A Special Type of Cooperative Argumentative Dialogue. Argumentation 2 (4):441-464.
    This article consists of three parts, two introductory, in which the limits and the methods of analysis of dialogues are expounded, and the major part, in which the main features of a philosophical theory of disputation are outlined.It was an essential aim of the philosophical analysis of argumentative dialogues to develop tools of substantiation for cases in which logic doesn't help any more. In the first part of this paper I show that such tools can and will be developed only (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  48.  12
    Gilbert Burgh (2003). The World of Dialogue. [REVIEW] Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis 23 (2):162-164.
    This is a book review of: Thinking Through Dialogue: Essays on Philosophy in Practice, byTrevor Curnow (editor), 2001, Surrey, UK: Practical Philosophy Press, 251 pages.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  10
    Douglas Walton (2006). How to Make and Defend a Proposal in a Deliberation Dialogue. Artificial Intelligence and Law 14 (3):177-239.
    In this paper it is shown how tools developed in argumentation theory and artificial intelligence can be applied to the development of a new dialectical analysis of the speech act of making a proposal in a deliberation dialogue. These tools are developed, modified and used to formulate dialogue pre-conditions, defining conditions and post-conditions for the speech act of making a proposal in a deliberation dialogue. The defining conditions set out what is required for a move in a (...)
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  9
    Ana Cristina Zimmermann & W. John Morgan (2016). A Time for Silence? Its Possibilities for Dialogue and for Reflective Learning. Studies in Philosophy and Education 35 (4):399-413.
    From the beginning of history sounds have played a fundamentally important role in humanity’s development as ways of expression and of communication. However in contemporary western society, and indeed globally, we are experiencing an excess of speech and a relentless encouragement to expression. Such excess indicates a misunderstanding about what expression and dialogue should be. This condition encourages us to think about silence, solitude and contemplation and the role they might play in restoring the realm of personal understanding of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000