Search results for 'distributive ethics' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Russell Hardin (1999). From Bodo Ethics to Distributive Justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (4):399-413.score: 64.0
    Concern with material equality as the central form of distributive justice is a very modern idea. Distributive justice for Aristotle and many other writers for millennia after him was a matter of distributing what each ought to get from merit or desert in some sense. Many, such as Hume, thought material equality a pernicious idea. In the medieval village life of Bodo, villagers knew enough about each other to govern relations through norms, including, when necessary, a norm of (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Eric O. Jacobsen (2008). Mr Walzer's Neighborhood: The Need for Geographic Particularity in Distributive Ethics. Ethics, Place and Environment 11 (1):1 – 16.score: 63.0
    In Spheres of Justice, Michael Walzer articulates an approach to distributive ethics based on complex equality that is closely attentive to the specific ways particular communities value goods. A renewed interest in place and geography among practitioners and theoreticians is giving rise to questions that are beyond the scope of Walzer's system and reveal abstractions at the geographic level that undercut his overall approach. This internal inconsistency weakens, but does not ultimately discount, Walzer's overall system of distributive (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Albino Barrera (2007). Globalization and Economic Ethics: Distributive Justice in the Knowledge Economy. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 54.0
    What is the appropriate criterion to use for distributive justice? Is it efficiency, need, contribution, entitlement, equality, effort, or ability? Globalization and Economic Ethics maintains that far from being rival principles of distributive justice, efficiency and need satisfaction are, in fact, complementary norms in our emerging knowledge economy. After all, human capital plays the central role in effecting and sustaining long-term efficiency in the Digital Age. This book explores the vital link between human capital formation and allocative (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. E. Wesley & F. Peterson (1999). The Ethics of Burden-Sharing in the Global Greenhouse. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):167-196.score: 48.0
    The Kyoto Protocol on global warming has provoked great controversy in part because it calls for heavier burdens on wealthy countries than on developing countries in the effort to control climate change. The U.S. Senate voted unanimously to oppose any agreement that does not require emissions reductions in low-income countries. The ethics of this position are examined in this paper which shows that there are good moral reasons for supporting the provisions of the Kyoto Protocol. Such a conclusion follows (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Stephen Maguire (1997). Business Ethics: A Compromise Between Politics and Virtue. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 16 (12-13):1411-1418.score: 48.0
    This article examines and synthesizes two different approaches to determining the content of business ethics courses and the manner in which they ought to be taught. The first approach, from a political perspective, argues that the institutional framework within which business operates ought to be tested by theories of distributive justice. The second approach, from the perspective of virtue theory, argues that we ought to examine the character of individual employees and the responsibilities associated with the roles which (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Dieter Birnbacher (1999). Ethics and Social Science: Which Kind of Co-Operation? [REVIEW] Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2 (4):319-336.score: 46.0
    The relation between ethics and social science is often conceived as complementary, both disciplines cooperating in the solution of concrete moral problems. Against this, the paper argues that not only applied ethics but even certain parts of general ethics have to incorporate sociological and psychological data and theories from the start. Applied ethics depends on social science in order to asses the impact of its own principles on the concrete realities which these principles are to regulate (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Elizabeth E. Umphress, Lily Run Ren, John B. Bingham & Celile Itir Gogus (2009). The Influence of Distributive Justice on Lying for and Stealing From a Supervisor. Journal of Business Ethics 86 (4):507 - 518.score: 42.0
    In a controlled laboratory experiment, we found evidence for our predictions that participants who received fair distributive treatment were more likely to lie to give a supervisor a good performance evaluation than those treated unfairly, and those who received unfair distributive treatment were more likely to steal money from a supervisor than those treated fairly. We further proposed that the presence of an ethical code of conduct would moderate these relationships such that when the code was present these (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. David Keyt (1985). Distributive Justice in Aristotle's Ethics and Politics. Topoi 4 (1):23-45.score: 39.0
    The symbolism introduced earlier provides a convenient vehicle for examining the status and consistency of Aristotle's three diverse justifications and for explaining how he means to avoid Protagorean relativism without embracing Platonic absolutism. When the variables ‘ x ’ and ‘ y ’ are allowed to range over the groups of free men in a given polis as well as over individual free men, the formula for the Aristotelian conception of justice expresses the major premiss of Aristotle's three justifications: (1) (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Jeffrey Moriarty (2011). Does Distributive Justice Pay? Sternberg's Compensation Ethics. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 25 (1):33-48.score: 39.0
    Compensation has received a great deal of attention from social scientists. Characteristically, they have been concerned with the causes and effects of various compensation schemes. By contrast, few theorists have addressed the normative aspects of compensation. An exception is Elaine Sternberg, who offers in Just Business a comprehensive theory of compensation ethics. This paper critically examines her theory, and argues that the justification she gives for it fails. Its failure is instructive, however. The main argument Sternberg gives for her (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Debabrata Talukdar (2011). Patterns of Research Productivity in the Business Ethics Literature: Insights From Analyses of Bibliometric Distributions. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 98 (1):137 - 151.score: 39.0
    In any academic discipline, published articles in respective journals represent "production units" of scientific knowledge, and bibliometric distributions reflect the patterns in such outputs across authors or "producers." Closely following the analysis approach used for similar studies in the economics and finance literature, we present the first study to examine whether there exists an empirical regularity in the bibliometric patterns of research productivity in the business ethics literature. Our results present strong evidence that there indeed exists a distinct empirical (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Nancy S. Jecker (2012). Ethics Committees and Distributive Justice. In D. Micah Hester & Toby Schonfeld (eds.), Guidance for Healthcare Ethics Committees. Cambridge University Press.score: 39.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Lynn A. Jansen & Steven Wall (2009). Paternalism and Fairness in Clinical Research. Bioethics 23 (3):172-182.score: 36.0
    In this paper, we defend the ethics of clinical research against the charge of paternalism. We do so not by denying that the ethics of clinical research is paternalistic, but rather by defending the legitimacy of paternalism in this context. Our aim is not to defend any particular set of paternalistic restrictions, but rather to make a general case for the permissibility of paternalistic restrictions in this context. Specifically, we argue that there is no basic liberty-right to participate (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Michael L. Gross (2011). Comradery, Community, and Care in Military Medical Ethics. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 32 (5):337-350.score: 36.0
    Medical ethics prohibits caregivers from discriminating and providing preferential care to their compatriots and comrades. In military medicine, particularly during war and when resources may be scarce, ethical principles may dictate priority care for compatriot soldiers. The principle of nondiscrimination is central to utilitarian and deontological theories of justice, but communitarianism and the ethics of care and friendship stipulate a different set of duties for community members, friends, and family. Similar duties exist among the small cohesive groups that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. David Braybrooke (1962). Collective and Distributive Generalization in Ethics. Analysis 23 (2):45 - 48.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. P. J. Naude (2005). In Defence of Partisan Justice: What Can African Business Ethics Learn From John Rawls? African Journal of Business Ethics 1 (1):31.score: 36.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Alex Voorhoeve (forthcoming). How Should We Aggregate Competing Claims? Ethics.score: 33.0
    Many believe that we ought to save a large number from being permanently bedridden rather than save one from death. Many also believe that we ought to save one from death rather than a multitude from a very minor harm, no matter how large this multitude. I argue that a principle I call “Aggregate Relevant Claims” satisfactorily explains these judgments. I offer a rationale for this principle and defend it against objections.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Leslie J. Vermillion, Walfried M. Lassar & Robert D. Winsor (2002). The Hunt–Vitell General Theoryof Marketing Ethics: Can It Enhance Our Understanding of Principal-Agent Relationships in Channels of Distribution? [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 41 (3):267 - 285.score: 33.0
    This paper advances the Hunt–Vitell General Theory of Marketing Ethics as a framework for enriching current understanding of both long-term marketing relationships in general, and principal-agent associations specifically. Under economic models of agency theory, manufacturer-distributor relationships are conceptualized as principal-agent associations where both parties are assumed be motivated exclusively by short-term financial self-interest within the logical constraints of zero-sum game conditions. As a general model of ethical decision making and behavior in marketing, the Hunt–Vitell theory illustrates how ethical decisions (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Michael J. Selgelid (2007). Ethics and Drug Resistance. Bioethics 21 (4):218–229.score: 33.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Marjorie Chan (2002). Violations of Service Fairness and Legal Ramifications: The Case of the Managed Care Industry. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 36 (4):315 - 336.score: 33.0
    Adapted from Chan's (2000) model depicting success of litigation, this paper argues that with the application of various legislation, health maintenance organizations' (HMOs') violations of service fairness to each group: enrollees, physicians, and hospitals give rise to each group's lawsuits against the HMOs. Various authors (Bowen et al., 1999; Seiders and Berry, 1998) indicate that justice concepts such as distributive, procedural, and interactional justice can be applied to the area of service fairness. The violation of these underlying justice principles (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Fiona Robinson (2013). Global Care Ethics: Beyond Distribution, Beyond Justice. Journal of Global Ethics 9 (2):131 - 143.score: 33.0
    This article defends an ethics of care approach to global justice, which begins with an empirically informed account of injustices resulting from the workings and effects of contemporary neo-liberalism and hegemonic masculinities. Dominant distributive approaches to global justice see the unequal distribution of resources or ?primary goods? as the basic source of injustice. Crucially, however, most of these liberal theories do not challenge the basic structural and ideational ?frames? that govern the global political economy. Instead, they seek to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Alex Voorhoeve, Should Losses Count? A Critique of the Complaint Model. Choice Group Working Papers.score: 31.0
    The Complaint Model is an interpretation of Scanlon’s contractualism which holds that (1) an individual can reasonably reject a distribution of well-being when her complaint against that distribution is larger than any other person’s complaint against any other distribution. The Complaint Model further holds that (2) the size of an individual’s complaint against a distribution is a function of (2a) her absolute level of well-being under that distribution, with the size of her complaint increasing as her absolute level of well-being (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Marc Fleurbaey & Alex Voorhoeve (2012). Egalitarianism and the Separateness of Persons. Utilitas 24 (3):381-398.score: 30.0
    The difference between the unity of the individual and the separateness of persons requires that there be a shift in the moral weight that we accord to changes in utility when we move from making intrapersonal tradeoffs to making interpersonal tradeoffs. We examine which forms of egalitarianism can, and which cannot, account for this shift. We argue that a form of egalitarianism which is concerned only with the extent of outcome inequality cannot account for this shift. We also argue that (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Paul B. Thompson (2010). Food Aid and the Famine Relief Argument (Brief Return). Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 23 (3):209-227.score: 30.0
    Recent publications by Pogge ( Global ethics: seminal essays. St. Paul: Paragon House 2008 ) and by Singer ( The life you can save: acting now to end world poverty. New York: Random House 2009 ) have resuscitated a debate over the justifiability of famine relief between Singer and ecologist Garrett Hardin in the 1970s. Yet that debate concluded with a general recognition that (a) general considerations of development ethics presented more compelling ethical problems than famine relief; and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Toby Svoboda, Klaus Keller, Marlos Goes & Nancy Tuana (2011). Sulfate Aerosol Geoengineering: The Question of Justice. Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (3):157-180.score: 30.0
    Some authors have called for increased research on various forms of geoengineering as a means to address global climate change. This paper focuses on the question of whether a particular form of geoengineering, namely deploying sulfate aerosols in the stratosphere to counteract some of the effects of increased greenhouse gas concentrations, would be a just response to climate change. In particular, we examine problems sulfate aerosol geoengineering (SAG) faces in meeting the requirements of distributive, intergenerational, and procedural justice. We (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Michael Otsuka & Alex Voorhoeve (2011). Reply to Crisp. Utilitas 23 (1):109-114.score: 30.0
    In 'Why It Matters that Some Are Worse off than Others,' we offer a new critique of the Priority View. In a recent article, Roger Crisp has argued that our critique is flawed. In this reply Crisp, we show that Crisp fails to grapple with, much less defeat, the central claim of our critique. We also show that an example that Crisp offers in support of the Priority View in fact lends support to our critique of that view.
    No categories
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Anca Gheaus (2009). The Challenge of Care to Idealizing Theories of Distributive Justice. In Lisa Tessman (ed.), Feminist Ethics and Social and Political Philosophy: Theorizing the Non-Ideal. Springer. 105--119.score: 30.0
    The ideal of distributive justice as a means of ensuring fair distribution of social opportunities is a cornerstone of contemporary feminist theory. Feminists from various disciplines have developed arguments to support the redistribution of the work of care through institutional mechanisms. I discuss the limits of such distribution under the conditions of theories that do not idealize human agents as independent beings. People’s reliance on care, understood as a response to needs, is pervasive and infuses almost all human interaction. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Victor P. Lau & Yin Yee Wong (2009). Direct and Multiplicative Effects of Ethical Dispositions and Ethical Climates on Personal Justice Norms: A Virtue Ethics Perspective. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 90 (2):279 - 294.score: 30.0
    From virtue ethics and interactionist perspectives, we hypothesized that personal justice norms (distributive and procedural justice norms) were shaped directly and multiplicatively by ethical dispositions (equity sensitivity and need for structure) and ethical climates (egoistic, benevolent, and principle climates). We collected multisource data from 123 companies in Hong Kong, with personal factors assessed by participants’ self-reports and contextual factors by aggregations of their peers. In general, LISREL analyses with latent product variables supported the direct and multiplicative relationships. Our (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Albino Barrera (1999). The Evolution of Social Ethics: Using Economic History to Understand Economic Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (2):285 - 304.score: 30.0
    In the development of Roman Catholic social thought from the teachings of the scholastics to the modern social encyclicals, changes in normative economics reflect the transformation of an economic terrain from its feudal roots to the modern industrial economy. The preeminence accorded by the modern market to the allocative over the distributive function of price broke the convenient convergence of commutative and distributive justice in scholastic just price theory. Furthermore, the loss of custom, law, and usage in defining (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Marcel Bahro, Christian Kämpf & Jindrich Strnad (2001). Die Verteilungsgerechtigkeit Medizinischer Leistungen. Ein Beitrag Zur Rationierungsdebatte Aus Wirtschaftsethischer Sicht. Ethik in der Medizin 13 (1-2):45-60.score: 30.0
    Definition of the problem: Rationing medical health care has been debated in the industrialized Western hemisphere for at least two decades. Many factors have contributed to the fact that medical care can no longer be provided free of charge, which used to be an explicit political goal in all countries with a well-established welfare system. Considerable shortage of public financial resources is now generally accepted to pertain also to the health care system. Arguments: So far, efforts have been made to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Wolfgang Grassl & André Habisch (2011). Ethics and Economics: Towards a New Humanistic Synthesis for Business. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 99 (1):37 - 49.score: 30.0
    The Encyclical-Letter Caritas in Ventate by Pope Benedict XVI suggests to advance towards a new conceptualization of the tenuous relationship between economics and ethics, proposing a "new humanistic synthesis" Where social encyclicals have traditionally justified policy proposals by natural law and theological reasoning alone, Caritas in Ventate gives great relevance to economic arguments. The encyclical defines the framework for a new business ethics which appreciates allocative and distributive efficiency, and thus both markets and institutions as improving the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Alison Adam (2008). Ethics for Things. Ethics and Information Technology 10 (2-3):149-154.score: 27.0
    This paper considers the ways that Information Ethics (IE) treats things. A number of critics have focused on IE’s move away from anthropocentrism to include non-humans on an equal basis in moral thinking. I enlist Actor Network Theory, Dennett’s views on ‹as if’ intentionality and Magnani’s characterization of ‹moral mediators’. Although they demonstrate different philosophical pedigrees, I argue that these three theories can be pressed into service in defence of IE’s treatment of things. Indeed the support they lend to (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Douglas MacKay (2013). Standard of Care, Institutional Obligations, and Distributive Justice. Bioethics 28 (2).score: 27.0
    The problem of standard of care in clinical research concerns the level of treatment that investigators must provide to subjects in clinical trials. Commentators often formulate answers to this problem by appealing to two distinct types of obligations: professional obligations and natural duties. In this article, I investigate whether investigators also possess institutional obligations that are directly relevant to the problem of standard of care, that is, those obligations a person has because she occupies a particular institutional role. I examine (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Mark T. Nelson (1998). An Aristotelian Business Ethics? Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (1):89–104.score: 27.0
    Elaine Sternberg's Just Business is one of the first book-length Aristotelian treatments of business ethics. ^It is Aristotelian in the sense that Sternberg begins by defining the nature of business in order to identify its end, and, thence, normative principles to regulate it. According to Sternberg, the nature of business is 'the selling of goods or services in order to maximise long-term owner value', therefore all business behaviour must be evaluated =with reference to the maximisation of long-term owner value, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. E. Clinton Gardner (1995). Justice and Christian Ethics. Cambridge University Press.score: 27.0
    Justice and Christian Ethics is a study in the meaning and foundations of justice in modern society. Written from a theological perspective, its focus is upon the interaction of religion and law in their common pursuit of justice. Consideration is given, first, to the historical roots of justice in the classical tradition of virtue (Aristotle and Aquinas) and in the biblical ideas of covenant and the righteousness of God. Subsequent chapters trace the relationships between justice, law, and virtue in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.) (2005). Business Ethics. Sage Publications.score: 27.0
    Business Ethics is a three-volume collection which provides students and researchers with the historically most important of the classic articles in business ethics, as well as the best of the contemporary and trendsetting work in this burgeoning area. The collection will serve as a sourcebook for academics and researchers entering or already established in the area of business ethics. The editors bring together a breadth of articles across business ethics, with an orientation that is diverse as (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Stuart Rennie (2006). Is It Ethical to Study What Ought Not to Happen? Developing World Bioethics 6 (2):71–77.score: 27.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Thomas Gutmann (1998). Medizinische Ethik Und Organtransplantation. Ethik in der Medizin 10 (1):58-67.score: 27.0
    During the last two decades a broad and intensive discussion has taken place in the field of medical ethics. Especially in the English-speaking countries, “Biomedical Ethics” have developed as a part of secular, philosophical moral theory. Two ethical problems in organ transplantation – living organ donation and organ allocation – illustrate that this transition reflects both the complex ethical questions raised by rapid changes in the biological sciences and in health care, and the fact that traditional Hippocratic (...) have proven to be inadequate in several respects. (shrink)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Steven E. Kaplan, Janet A. Samuels & Jeffrey Cohen (forthcoming). An Examination of the Effect of CEO Social Ties and CEO Reputation on Nonprofessional Investors' Say-on-Pay Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics.score: 27.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Marita Nordhaug & Per Nortvedt (2011). Justice and Proximity: Problems for an Ethics of Care. [REVIEW] Health Care Analysis 19 (1):3-14.score: 27.0
    This paper aims at addressing some questions considering the conflicting normative claims of partiality, i.e. to provide for the caring needs of the particular patient, and impartial claims of treating all patients with a relevant need equally. This ethical conflict between different conceptions of moral responsibilities within professional ethics relates to debates between an ethics of care and an ethics of justice. An ethics of care is a particularistic position that endorses some form of partiality, i.e. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Johannes Siegrist (2001). Distributive Gerechtigkeit Und Gesundheit: Eine Medizinsoziologische Perspektive. [REVIEW] Ethik in der Medizin 13 (1-2):33-44.score: 27.0
    Definition of the problem: While the main focus of the discussion on medical ethics concerns the physician’s conflicts as a result of rationing medical care, this paper postulates that resource allocation with indirect impact on the level of morbidity and mortality of a population also provides an important topic in medical ethics. In particular, increasing social inequalities in health are observed in many of the economically most advanced societies. Arguments: The social gradient of mortality in midlife is widening (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Stephen Wilmot (2011). Evidence, Ethics and Inclusion: A Broader Base for NICE. [REVIEW] Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (2):111-121.score: 27.0
    The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (hereafter NICE) was created in 1998 to give guidance on which treatments should be provided by the British National Health Service, and to whom. So it has a crucial role as an agent of distributive justice. In this paper I argue that it is failing to adequately explain and justify its decisions in the public arena, particularly in terms of distributive justice; and that this weakens its legitimacy, to the detriment (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Orly Shapira-Lishchinsky & Zehava Rosenblatt (2009). Perceptions of Organizational Ethics as Predictors of Work Absence: A Test of Alternative Absence Measures. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4):717 - 734.score: 26.0
    The study examined the distinction between two traditional work absence measures: frequency, reflecting voluntary absence, and duration, reflecting non-voluntary absence. The two measures were compared in a test of the relationship between work absence and employees’ perceptions of organizational ethics. Questionnaires and archive data were collected from 1,016 teachers in Israel. Organizational ethics was represented by three variables: ethical climate (caring and formal), organizational justice (distributive and procedural), and teacher’s tendency to misbehave. Results showed that four (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Anca Gheaus (2013). Care Drain as an Issue of Global Gender Justice. Ethical Perspectives 20 (1).score: 25.0
  44. Bridget Haire & Christopher Jordens (2013). Mind the Gap: An Empirical Study of Post‐Trial Access in HIV Biomedical Prevention Trials. Developing World Bioethics 14 (1).score: 25.0
    The principle of providing post-trial access for research participants to successful products of that research is widely accepted and has been enshrined in various declarations and guidelines. While recent ethical guidelines recognise that the responsibility to provide post-trial access extends to sponsors, regulators and government bodies as well as to researchers, it is the researchers who have the direct duty of care to participants. Researchers may thus need to act as advocates for trial participants, especially where government bodies, sponsors, and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Pablo Gilabert (2010). Global Justice. In Mark Bevir (ed.), Encyclopedia of Political Theory. Sage.score: 24.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Mark S. Schwartz (2004). Effective Corporate Codes of Ethics: Perceptions of Code Users. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 55 (4):323 - 343.score: 24.0
    The study examines employee, managerial, and ethics officer perceptions regarding their companies codes of ethics. The study moves beyond examining the mere existence of a code of ethics to consider the role that code content and code process (i.e. creation, implementation, and administration) might play with respect to the effectiveness of codes in influencing behavior. Fifty-seven in-depth, semi-structured interviews of employees, managers, and ethics officers were conducted at four large Canadian companies. The factors viewed by respondents (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Matt Zwolinski (2009). Price Gouging, Non-Worseness, and Distributive Justice. Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2):295-306.score: 24.0
    This paper develops my position on the ethics of price gouging in response to Jeremy Snyder's article, "What's the Matter with Price Gouging." First, it explains how the "nonworseness claim" supports the moral permissibility of price gouging, even if it does not show that price gougers are morally virtuous agents. Second, it argues that questions about price gouging and distributive justice must be answered in light of the relevant possible institutional alternatives, and that Snyder's proposed alternatives to price (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000