Search results for 'domination' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Shane Duarte (2012). Leibniz and Monadic Domination. Oxford Studies in Early Modern Philosophy 6:209-48.score: 24.0
    In this paper, I aim to offer a clear explanation of what monadic domination, understood as a relation obtaining exclusively among monads, amounts to in the philosophy of Leibniz (and this insofar as monadic domination is conceived by Leibniz not to account for the substantial unity of composite substances). Central to my account is the Aristotelian notion of a hierarchy of activities, as well as a particular understanding of the relations that obtain among the perceptions of monads that (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. M. Victoria Costa (2009). Rawls on Liberty and Domination. Res Publica 15 (4):397--413.score: 24.0
    One of the central elements of John Rawls’ argument in support of his two principles of justice is the intuitive normative ideal of citizens as free and equal. But taken in isolation, the claim that citizens are to be treated as free and equal is extremely indeterminate, and has virtually no clear implications for policy. In order to remedy this, the two principles of justice, together with the stipulation that citizens have basic interests in developing their moral capacities and pursuing (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Lena Halldenius (1998). Non-Domination and Egalitarian Welfare Politics. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 1 (3):335-353.score: 24.0
    In this article I will do three things: I will argue that solidarity is not necessary for political legitimacy, that non-domination is a strong candidate for legitimacy criterion, and, finally, that non-domination can legitimate the egalitarian welfare state.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Alan M. S. J. Coffee (2012). Mary Wollstonecraft, Freedom and the Enduring Power of Social Domination. European Journal of Political Theory 12 (2):116-135.score: 24.0
    Even long after their formal exclusion has come to an end, members of previously oppressed social groups often continue to face disproportionate restrictions on their freedom, as the experience of many women over the last century has shown. Working within in a framework in which freedom is understood as independence from arbitrary power, Mary Wollstonecraft provides an explanation of why such domination may persist and offers a model through which it can be addressed. Republicans rely on processes of rational (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Mark Rigstad (2011). Republicanism and Geopolitical Domination. Journal of Political Power 4 (2):279-300.score: 24.0
    Philip Pettit’s neo-Roman republican theory of non-domination is billed as a more egalitarian alternative to classical liberal theories of non-interference. As a theory of geopolitical affairs, however, his republicanism fails to fulfill this egalitarian promise in ways that closely echo John Rawls’s liberal law of peoples. Pettit’s republican law of peoples is ill equipped to address structural sources of transnational and global domination because it exaggerates the ontological separateness of peoples, it overvalues the self-sufficiency of states for purposes (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. M. Victoria Costa (2009). Rawls on Liberty and Domination. Res Publica 15 (4):397-413.score: 24.0
    One of the central elements of John Rawls’ argument in support of his two principles of justice is the intuitive normative ideal of citizens as free and equal. But taken in isolation, the claim that citizens are to be treated as free and equal is extremely indeterminate, and has virtually no clear implications for policy. In order to remedy this, the two principles of justice, together with the stipulation that citizens have basic interests in developing their moral capacities and pursuing (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Zeus Leonardo (2003). Interpretation and the Problem of Domination: Paul Ricoeur's Hermeneutics. Studies in Philosophy and Education 22 (5):329-350.score: 24.0
    Hermeneutics, or the science of interpretation,is well accepted in the humanities. In thefield of education, hermeneutics has played arelatively marginal role in research. It isthe task of this essay to introduce thegeneral methods and findings of Paul Ricoeur'shermeneutics. Specifically, the essayinterprets the usefulness of Ricoeur'sphilosophy in the study of domination. Theproblem of domination has been a target ofanalysis for critical pedagogy since itsinception. However, the role of interpretationas a constitutive part of ideology critique isrelatively understudied and it is (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Iseult Honohan (2014). Domination and Migration: An Alternative Approach to the Legitimacy of Migration Controls. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1):31-48.score: 24.0
    Freedom as non-domination provides a distinctive criterion for assessing the justifiability of migration controls, different from both freedom of movement and autonomy. Migration controls are dominating insofar as they threaten to coerce potential migrants. Both the general right of states to control migration, and the wide range of discretionary procedures prevalent in migration controls, render outsiders vulnerable to arbitrary power. While the extent and intensity of domination varies, it is sufficient under contemporary conditions of globalization to warrant limits (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Marie Garrau & Alice Le Goff (2009). Vulnérabilité, non-domination et autonomie : l'apport du néorépublicanisme. Astérion 6.score: 24.0
    L’anthropologie philosophique est l’un des fronts sur lesquels s’est développée, ces dernières années, la critique du libéralisme politique : à la figure d’un sujet rationnel et souverain, déjà autonome, certains courants de la théorie politique ont tenté d’opposer une conception alternative du sujet et c’est dans ce contexte qu’a émergé la thématique de la vulnérabilité dont le développement est apparu comme le fondement éventuel d’un dépassement de la problématique libérale. On ne s’étonnera pas de voir la référence à la vulnérabilité (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Iseult Honohan & Marit Hovdal-Moan (2014). Introduction: Domination, Migration and Non-Citizens. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 17 (1):1-9.score: 24.0
    In Europe and other regions of the world public debate concerning how many immigrants should be admitted, which rights those admitted should have, and which conditions can be required for access to citizenship is intense and enduring, and these have increasingly become central electoral issues. On the one hand, the harsh treatment of migrants is often a matter of public criticism; on the other hand, states are concerned about problems of welfare, security and social unrest that they have come to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Christopher McCammon (forthcoming). Domination: A Rethinking. Ethics.score: 24.0
    Sometimes dictators are benevolent. Sometimes masters are kind and gentle to their slaves. John Adams was a pretty good "husband" to Abigail Adams. But it seems like there’s something very wrong with being a dictator or a master or a spouse with the power that John Adams had over Abigail Adams in late 18th Century America. A theory of domination tries to pinpoint what’s distinctive about dictatorship and mastery and traditional husbanding, and what is distinctively wrong with such—even the (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Pantelis E. Eleftheriou (2009). Compact Domination for Groups Definable in Linear o-Minimal Structures. Archive for Mathematical Logic 48 (7):607-623.score: 24.0
    We prove the Compact Domination Conjecture for groups definable in linear o-minimal structures. Namely, we show that every definably compact group G definable in a saturated linear o-minimal expansion of an ordered group is compactly dominated by (G/G 00, m, π), where m is the Haar measure on G/G 00 and π : G → G/G 00 is the canonical group homomorphism.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Alan M. S. J. Coffee (2013). Two Spheres of Domination: Republican Theory, Social Norms and the Insufficiency of Negative Freedom. Contemporary Political Theory.score: 24.0
    Republicans understand freedom as the guaranteed protection against any arbitrary use of coercive power. This freedom is exercised within a political community, and the concept of arbitrariness is defined with reference to the actual ideas of its citizens about what is in their shared interests. According to many current defenders of the republican model, this form of freedom is understood in strictly negative terms representing an absence of domination. I argue that this assumption is misguided. First, it is internally (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Marie Garrau & Alice Le Goff (2009). Vulnérabilité, non-domination et autonomie : vers une critique du néorépublicanisme. Astérion 6.score: 24.0
    L’anthropologie philosophique est l’un des fronts sur lesquels s’est développée, ces dernières années, la critique du libéralisme politique : à la figure d’un sujet rationnel et souverain, déjà autonome, certains courants de la théorie politique ont tenté d’opposer une conception alternative du sujet et c’est dans ce contexte qu’a émergé la thématique de la vulnérabilité dont le développement est apparu comme le fondement éventuel d’un dépassement de la problématique libérale. On ne s’étonnera pas de voir la référence à la vulnérabilité (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Slavoj Žižek (2004). The Structure of Domination Today: A Lacanian View. Studies in East European Thought 56 (4):383-403.score: 21.0
    Two topics determine today's liberal tolerant attitude towards Others: the respect of Otherness and the obsessive fear of harassment: the Other is OK insofar as its presence is not intrusive, insofar as the Other is not really Other. The central human right in late-capitalist society, namely the right to be free from all harassment by the Other including the violent imposition of ethical norms, contrasts sharply with the violent imposition of divine Mosaic law – the Decalogue – from which the (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. David E. Diamondstone, Damir D. Dzhafarov & Robert I. Soare (2010). $\Pi^0_1$ Classes, Peano Arithmetic, Randomness, and Computable Domination. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 51 (1):127-159.score: 21.0
    We present an overview of the topics in the title and of some of the key results pertaining to them. These have historically been topics of interest in computability theory and continue to be a rich source of problems and ideas. In particular, we draw attention to the links and connections between these topics and explore their significance to modern research in the field.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Jean-Philippe Deranty (2011). Travail et expérience de la domination dans le néolibéralisme contemporain. Actuel Marx 1 (1):73-89.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Danièle Linhart (2011). De la domination et de son déni. Actuel Marx 1 (1):90-103.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Michael Burawoy (2011). La Domination Est-Elle Si Profonde? Au-Delà de Bourdieu Et de Gramsci. Actuel Marx 2 (2):166-190.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Claude Gautier (2011). La domination en sociologie n'est-elle qu'une fiction? Actuel Marx 1 (1):32-45.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Stephen G. Simpson (2007). Almost Everywhere Domination and Superhighness. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 53 (4):462-482.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Natacha Borgeaud-Garciandía & Bruno Lautier (2011). La Personnalisation de la Relation de Domination au Travail: Les Ouvrières des Maquilas Et les Employées Domestiques En Amérique Latine. Actuel Marx 1 (1):104-120.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Bernard Lahire (2011). Kafka Et le Travail de la Domination. Actuel Marx 1 (1):46-59.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Emmanuel Renault (2011). Comment Marx se réfère-t-il au travail et à la domination? Actuel Marx 1 (1):15-31.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Stephen G. Simpson (2007). Mass Problems and Almost Everywhere Domination. Mathematical Logic Quarterly 53 (4):483-492.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. John Darling & Maaike Van De Pijpekamp (1994). Rousseau on the Education, Domination and Violation of Women. British Journal of Educational Studies 42 (2):115 - 132.score: 18.0
    This article argues that Rousseau's endorsement of male domination and his illiberal views of rape, punishment and the education of women have been seriously underestimated by twentieth century commentators who tend to produce expoisitions of his work that evade, ignore or marginalise this 'darker side' of his educational philosophy.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. M. Victoria Costa (2009). Neo-Republicanism, Freedom as Non-Domination, and Citizen Virtue. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 8 (4):401-419.score: 18.0
    This article discusses Philip Pettit’s neo-republicanism in light of the criterion of self-sustenance: the requirement that a political theory be capable of serving as a self-sustaining public philosophy for a pluralist democracy. It argues that this criterion can only be satisfied by developing an adequate politics of virtue. Pettit’s theory is built around the notion of freedom as non-domination, and he does not say much about the virtues of citizens or the policies the state may employ to encourage their (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Michael P. Allen (2006). Hegel Between Non-Domination and Expressive Freedom: Capabilities, Perspectives, Democracy. Philosophy and Social Criticism 32 (4):493-512.score: 18.0
    Hegel may be read as endorsing a republican conception of freedom as non-domination. This may then be allied to an expressive conception of freedom not as communal integration and non-alienation, but rather as the development of new powers and capabilities. To this extent, he may be understood as occupying a position between nondomination and expressive freedom. This not only informs contemporary discussions of republicanism and democracy, but also suggests a ‘capabilities solution’ to the otherwise intractable problem of the rabble. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Kristoffer Ahlstrom-Vij (2012). Review of Frank Lovett, A General Theory of Domination and Justice (Oxford UP, 2010). [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 62 (246):190-192.score: 18.0
    The review argues that Lovett’s theory of domination suffers from a problem. Lovett is aware of the problem and bites a fairly large bullet in response to it. What he does not seem aware of is that the problem can be avoided by opting for an account of welfare that he unfortunately ignores, despite the fact that it would serve his purposes well.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. M. D. Harbour (2012). Non-Domination and Pure Negative Liberty. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (2):186-205.score: 18.0
    The central insights of Philip Pettit’s republican account of liberty are that (1) freedom consists in the absence of domination and (2) non-domination is not reducible to what is commonly called ‘negative liberty’. Recently, however, Matthew Kramer and Ian Carter have questioned whether the harms identified by Pettit under the banner of domination are not equally well accounted for by what they call the ‘pure negative’ view. In this article, first I argue that Pettit’s response to their (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Amy Allen (1999). The Power of Feminist Theory: Domination, Resistance, Solidarity. Westview Press.score: 18.0
    Power is clearly a crucial concept for feminist theory. Insofar as feminists are interested in analyzing power, it is because they have an interest in understanding, critiquing, and ultimately challenging the multiple array of unjust power relations affecting women in contemporary Western societies, including sexism, racism, heterosexism, and class oppression.In The Power of Feminist Theory, Amy Allen diagnoses the inadequacies of previous feminist conceptions of power, and draws on the work of a diverse group of theorists of power, including Michel (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. James Bohman (2011). Is Hegel a Republican? Pippin, Recognition, and Domination in the Philosophy of Right. Inquiry 53 (5):435-449.score: 18.0
    Robert Pippin's masterful account of rational agency in Hegel emphasizes important dimensions of freedom and independence, where putative independence is always bound up with a profound dependence on others. This insistence on the complex relationships between freedom, dependence and independence raise an important question that Pippin does not consider: is Hegel a republican? This is especially significant given the fact that modern republicanism has explored this same conceptual terrain. I argue that a form of republicanism is in fact an important (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Pamela Pansardi (2012). A Non-Normative Theory of Power and Domination. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 16 (5):1-20.score: 18.0
    Despite the variety of competing interpretations of domination, a common feature of the most influential analyses of the concept is their reliance on a normative criterion: the detrimental effect of domination on those subject to it. This article offers a non-evaluative, non-consequence-based definition of domination, in line with the perspective on power developed by the theory of the social exchange. Domination, it is argued, should be seen as a structural property of a power relation, and consists (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Amy L. Goff-Yates (2000). Karen Warren and the Logic of Domination: A Defense. Environmental Ethics 22 (2):169-181.score: 18.0
    Karen Warren claims that there is a “logic of domination” at work in the oppressive conceptual frameworks informing both sexism and naturism. Although her account of the principle of domination as a connection between oppressions has been an influential one in ecofeminist theory, it has been challenged by recent criticism. Both Karen Green and John Andrews maintain that the principle of domination,as Warren articulates it, is ambiguous. The principle, according to Green, admits of two possible readings, each (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Sandra Bartky (1993). Reply to Commentators on "Femininity and Domination". Hypatia 8 (1):192 - 196.score: 18.0
    Sandra Bartky's reply to the paper in the Symposium on her book Femininity and Domination.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. James Bohman (2012). Domination, Epistemic Injustice and Republican Epistemology. Social Epistemology 26 (2):175-187.score: 18.0
    With her conception of epistemic injustice, Miranda Fricker has opened up new normative dimensions for epistemology; that is, the injustice of denying one?s status as a knower. While her analysis of the remedies for such injustices focuses on the epistemic virtues of agents, I argue for the normative superiority of adapting a broadly republican conception of epistemic injustice. This argument for a republican epistemology has three steps. First, I focus on methodological and explanatory issues of identifying epistemic injustice and argue, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Patricia M. Lengermann & Jill Niebrugge (1995). Intersubjectivity and Domination: A Feminist Investigation of the Sociology of Alfred Schutz. Sociological Theory 13 (1):25-36.score: 18.0
    This paper argues the case for a renewed interest in Schutz's work by extending his theory of the conscious subject to the feminist concern with the issue of domination. We present a theoretical analysis of the subjective and intersubjective experiences of individuals relating to each other as dominant and subordinate; as our theoretical point of departure we use Schutz's concepts of the we-relation, the assumption of reciprocity of perspectives, typification, working, taken-for-grantedness, and relevance. Schutz's sociology of the conscious subject (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. J. Robert G. Williams (2012). Generalized Probabilism: Dutch Books and Accuracy Domination. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (5):811-840.score: 18.0
    Jeff Paris (2001) proves a generalized Dutch Book theorem. If a belief state is not a generalized probability (a kind of probability appropriate for generalized distributions of truth-values) then one faces ‘sure loss’ books of bets. In <span class='Hi'>Williams</span> (manuscript) I showed that Joyce’s (1998) accuracy-domination theorem applies to the same set of generalized probabilities. What is the relationship between these two results? This note shows that (when ‘accuracy’ is treated via the Brier Score) both results are easy corollaries (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jacob T. Levy (2008). Self-Determination, Non-Domination, and Federalism. Hypatia 23 (3):pp. 60-78.score: 18.0
    This article summarizes the theory of federalism as non-domination Iris Marion Young began to develop in her final years, a theory of self-government that tried to recognize interconnectedness. Levy also poses an objection to that theory: non-domination cannot do the work Young needed of it, because it is a theory about the merits of decisions not about jurisdiction over them. The article concludes with an attempt to give Young the last word.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Eoin Daly (2011). Non-Domination as a Primary Good: Re-Thinking the Frontiers of the 'Political' in Rawls's Political Liberalism. Jurisprudence 2 (1):37-72.score: 18.0
    The republican project of freedom as non-domination commits the State to endowing citizens with the resources and attitudes necessary to both apprehend domination and abstain from dominating others. This, some have argued, renders it incompatible with political liberalism, which eschews the promotion of personal liberal virtues, being derived independently of any 'comprehensive doctrine'. Republican freedom is therefore depicted as penetrating deeper, in its application, into intimate and 'private' spheres. I argue, through a Rousseauist interpretation of Rawls's social contract, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Christian Nadeau (2003). Non-Domination as a Moral Ideal. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 6 (1):120-134.score: 18.0
    In this article, I wish to show the importance of the consequentialist method for the realisation of the ideal of non-domination. If, as stated by Philip Pettit, consequentialist ethics helps to better conceive republican political institutions, we then have to see how the fundamental principles of republican liberty can meet the norms traditionally associated with consequentialism. After a brief presentation of consequentialism and republican liberty (as Pettit defines it), I criticize the idea that liberty as non-domination could be (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Katherine Chambers (2013). Slavery and Domination as Political Ideas in Augustine'scity of God. Heythrop Journal 54 (1):13-28.score: 18.0
    The purpose of this article is to explore the meaning of domination and slavery in the political philosophy of Augustine of Hippo (354–430), particularly in the major work of his later years, the City of God. It offers an exploration of this aspect of Augustine's thought in the light of relatively recent scholarship on the meaning of these terms for political philosophy (in particular, the work of Quentin Skinner and Philip Pettit). It finds that, in Augustine's eyes, the nature (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. J. Robert G. Williams, Dutch Books and Accuracy Domination.score: 18.0
    Jeff Paris (2001) proves a generalized Dutch Book theorem. If a belief state is not a generalized probability (a kind of probability appropriate for generalized distributions of truth-values) then one faces ‘sure loss’ books of bets. In Williams (manuscript) I showed that Joyce’s (1998) accuracy-domination theorem applies to the same set of generalized probabilities. What is the relationship between these two results? This note shows that (when ‘accuracy’ is treated via the Brier Score) both results are easy corollaries of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Eric Katz (1992). The Call of the Wild: The Struggle Against Domination and the Technological Fix of Nature. Environmental Ethics 14 (3):265-273.score: 18.0
    In this essay, I use encounters with the white-tailed deer of Fire Island to explore the “call of the wild”—the attraction to value that exists in a natural world outside of human control. Value exists in nature to the extent that it avoids modification by human technology. Technology “fixes” the natural world by improving it for human use or by restoring degraded ecosystems. Technology creates a “new world,” an artifactual reality that is far removed from the “wildness” of nature. The (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Brandon Look (2002). On Monadic Domination in Leibniz's Metaphysics. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 10 (3):379 – 399.score: 18.0
    I shall proceed in the following way. In parts II and III of this paper, I shall discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the interpretation put forward by Robert Merrihew Adams in his recent book, and I shall expand upon this account, discussing a crucial but hitherto unexamined aspect of the relation between dominant and subordinate monads, reconstructed from Leibniz's letters to Des Bosses and his essays of 1714, _Principles of Nature and Grace and Monadology. In part IV of this (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. William Leiss (1972/1974). The Domination of Nature. Boston,Beacon Press.score: 18.0
    In Part One Leiss traces the idea of the domination of nature from the Renaissance to the nineteenth century.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Carol A. Mickett (1993). Comments on Sandra Lee Bartky's "Femininity and Domination". Hypatia 8 (1):173 - 177.score: 18.0
    To illustrate the strength of Bartky's clarity of insight I focus on her discussion of shame found in two essays in Femininity and Domination. I argue that these essays as well as the other in the collection identify and offer a clear analysis of many issues central to feminism and call for Bartky to write a sequel which offers constructive suggestions of ways out.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. René Ceceña Alvarez (2012). L'inventio de la Nouvelle Espagne. Rhétorique et domination territoriale du Nouveau Monde. Astérion. Philosophie, Histoire des Idées, Pensée Politique 10 (10).score: 18.0
    Ce texte propose une analyse des mécanismes argumentatifs mis en œuvre dans les lettres que Hernán Cortés, conquistador du Mexique, a adressées à Charles V (Cartas de Relación) pour légitimer sa conquête du territoire qui deviendra la Nouvelle Espagne et, par ce biais, le Nouveau Monde. Il s’agit en particulier de montrer l’emploi du concept rhétorique d’inventio dans le passage d’une appropriation conceptuelle du « Nouveau Monde » (par l’élaboration de ce concept) à sa domination territoriale (la fondation de (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Roger Nash (1990). Adam's Place in Nature: Respect or Domination? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 3 (2):102-113.score: 18.0
    The creation story in Genesis speaks of humankind being given dominion over nature. Does this support the view that nature has solely instrumental value, and is of worth only insofar as it serves the necessities and conveniences of the human species? Does dominion amount to unfettered domination here? An interpretation of the story is advanced employing procedures of practical criticism. Three central images are focussed on: Adam's being given dominion over the other creatures, his naming of them, and his (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Rochelle M. Green, Bonnie Mann & Amy E. Story (2006). Care, Domination, and Representation. Journal of Mass Media Ethics 21 (2 & 3):177 – 195.score: 18.0
    Some photographs, more than mere representations, are ethical commands, calling us to respond to human suffering. Photos of Abu Graib, like iconic photos of Vietnam, called us to a posture of care, and confronted us with ourselves, with our national domination, and with how we represent ourselves to the world. This article, drawing on Kittay (1999), Butler (2004), and Levinas (1961, 1974, 1985), attempts to untangle the relation among care, domination, and representation. Implications for philosophers and journalists are (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000