Search results for 'evo-devo' (try it on Scholar)

162 found
Order:
  1.  26
    Uwe Hoßfeld & Lennart Olsson (2003). The Road From Haeckel: The Jena Tradition in Evolutionary Morphology and the Origins of “Evo-Devo”. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 18 (2):285-307.
    With Carl Gegenbaur and Ernst Haeckel, inspiredby Darwin and the cell theory, comparativeanatomy and embryology became established andflourished in Jena. This tradition wascontinued and developed further with new ideasand methods devised by some of Haeckelsstudents. This first period of innovative workin evolutionary morphology was followed byperiods of crisis and even a disintegration ofthe discipline in the early twentieth century.This stagnation was caused by a lack ofinterest among morphologists in Mendeliangenetics, and uncertainty about the mechanismsof evolution. Idealistic morphology was stillinfluental in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  2.  5
    Verónica S. Di Stilio (2011). Empowering Plant Evo‐Devo: Virus Induced Gene Silencing Validates New and Emerging Model Systems. Bioessays 33 (9):711-718.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther (2015). Evo-Devo as a Trading Zone. In Alan Love (ed.), Conceptual Change in Biology: Scientific and Philosophical Perspectives on Evolution and Development. Springer Verlag, Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science
    Evo-Devo exhibits a plurality of scientific “cultures” of practice and theory. When are the cultures acting—individually or collectively—in ways that actually move research forward, empirically, theoretically, and ethically? When do they become imperialistic, in the sense of excluding and subordinating other cultures? This chapter identifies six cultures – three /styles/ (mathematical modeling, mechanism, and history) and three /paradigms/ (adaptationism, structuralism, and cladism). The key assumptions standing behind, under, or within each of these cultures are explored. Characterizing the internal structure (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  4. Ron Amundson (2005). The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge University Press.
    In this book Ron Amundson examines two hundred years of scientific views on the evolution-development relationship from the perspective of evolutionary developmental biology. This perspective challenges several popular views about the history of evolutionary thought by claiming that many earlier authors had made history come out right for the Evolutionary Synthesis. The book starts with a revised history of nineteenth-century evolutionary thought. It then investigates how development became irrelevant with the Evolutionary Synthesis. It concludes with an examination of the contrasts (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   41 citations  
  5.  55
    Lindsay R. Craig (2009). Defending Evo‐Devo: A Response to Hoekstra and Coyne. Philosophy of Science 76 (3):335-344.
    The study of evolutionary developmental biology (“evo‐devo”) has recently experienced a dramatic surge in popularity among researchers and theorists concerned with evolution. However, some biologists and philosophers remain skeptical of the claims of evo‐devo. This paper discusses and responds to the recent high profile criticisms of evo‐devo presented by biologists Hopi E. Hoekstra and Jerry A. Coyne. I argue that their objections are unconvincing. Indeed, empirical research supports the main tenets of evo‐devo, including the claim that morphological evolution is the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  78
    Paul Griffiths, Evo-Devo Meets the Mind: Toward a Developmental Evolutionary Psychology.
    _The emerging discipline of evolutionary developmental biology has opened up many new _ _lines of investigation into morphological evolution. Here I explore how two of the core _ _theoretical concepts in ‘evo-devo’ – modularity and homology – apply to evolutionary _ _psychology. I distinguish three sorts of module - developmental, functional and mental _ _modules and argue that mental modules need only be ‘virtual’ functional modules. _ _Evolutionary psychologists have argued that separate mental modules are solutions to _ _separate (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  37
    Simon M. Reader (2006). Evo-Devo, Modularity, and Evolvability: Insights for Cultural Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4):361-362.
    Evolutionary developmental biology (“evo-devo”) may provide insights and new methods for studies of cognition and cultural evolution. For example, I propose using cultural selection and individual learning to examine constraints on cultural evolution. Modularity, the idea that traits vary independently, can facilitate evolution (increase “evolvability”), because evolution can act on one trait without disrupting another. I explore links between cognitive modularity, evolutionary modularity, and cultural evolvability. (Published Online November 9 2006).
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  44
    Ingo Brigandt (2009). Accounting for Vertebrate Limbs: From Owen's Homology to Novelty in Evo-Devo. Philosophy & Theory in Biology 1 (20130604):e004.
    This article reviews the recent reissuing of Richard Owen’s On the Nature of Limbs and its three novel, introductory essays. These essays make Owen’s 1849 text very accessible by discussing the historical context of his work and explaining how Owen’s ideas relate to his larger intellectual framework. In addition to the ways in which the essays point to Owen’s relevance for contemporary biology, I discuss how Owen’s unity of type theory and his homology claims about fins and limbs compare with (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  35
    Ron Amundson, Accounting For Vertebrate Limbs: From Owen's Homology To Novelty In Evo-Devo.
    This article reviews the recent reissuing of Richard Owen’s On the Nature of Limbs and its three novel, introductory essays. These essays make Owen’s 1849 text very accessible by discussing the historical context of his work and explaining how Owen’s ideas relate to his larger intellectual framework. In addition to the ways in which the essays point to Owen’s relevance for contemporary biology, I discuss how Owen’s unity of type theory and his homology claims about fins and limbs compare with (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  22
    Jeffrey H. Schwartz (2006). Decisions, Decisions: Why Thomas Hunt Morgan Was Not the "Father" of Evo-Devo. Philosophy of Science 73 (5):918-929.
    Although the construction of neo-Darwinism grew out of Thomas Hunt Morgan's melding of Darwinism and Mendelism, his evidence did not soley support a model of gradual change. To the contrary, he was confronted with observations that could have led him to a more "evo-devo" understanding of the emergence of novel features. Indeed, since Morgan was an embryologist before he became a fruit-fly geneticist, one would have predicted that the combination of these two lines of research would have resulted in (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  16
    R. Allen Gardner (2005). Animal Cognition Meets Evo-Devo. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5):699-700.
    Sound comparative psychology and modern evolutionary and developmental biology (often called evo-devo) emphasize powerful effects of developmental conditions on the expression of genetic endowment. Both demand that evolutionary theorists recognize these effects. Instead, Tomasello et al. compares studies of normal human children with studies of chimpanzees reared and maintained in cognitively deprived conditions, while ignoring studies of chimpanzees in cognitively appropriate environments.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  8
    Laura Nuño de la Rosa & Arantza Etxeberria, Pattern and Process in Evo-Devo: Descriptions and Explanations.
    In the evolutionary biology of the Modern Synthesis the study of patterns refers to how to identify and systematise order in lineages, looking for hierarchies or for branching/splitting events in the tree of life, whereas the resulting order is supposed to be due to underlying processes or mechanisms. But patterns and processes play distinct roles in evo-devo: four different views on the role of patterns and processes in descriptions and explanations of development and evolution: A) transformational; B) generative; C) (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. Ron Amundson (2007). The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge University Press.
    In this book Ron Amundson examines two hundred years of scientific views on the evolution-development relationship from the perspective of evolutionary developmental biology. This perspective challenges several popular views about the history of evolutionary thought by claiming that many earlier authors had made history come out right for the Evolutionary Synthesis. The book starts with a revised history of nineteenth-century evolutionary thought. It then investigates how development became irrelevant with the Evolutionary Synthesis. It concludes with an examination of the contrasts (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Ron Amundson (2012). The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge University Press.
    In this book Ron Amundson examines two hundred years of scientific views on the evolution-development relationship from the perspective of evolutionary developmental biology. This perspective challenges several popular views about the history of evolutionary thought by claiming that many earlier authors had made history come out right for the Evolutionary Synthesis. The book starts with a revised history of nineteenth-century evolutionary thought. It then investigates how development became irrelevant with the Evolutionary Synthesis. It concludes with an examination of the contrasts (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  10
    Marion Blute (2008). Is It Time for an Updated 'Eco-Evo-Devo'Definition of Evolution by Natural Selection? Spontaneous Generations 2 (1):1.
    Abstract A lot of science has passed under the bridge since the classic definition of evolution as a change in gene frequencies in a population became common. Much knowledge has accumulated since then about evolution, heredity, ecology, development, phenotypic plasticity, niche construction and genetic drift. Building on Van Valen’s description of evolution as “the control of development by ecology,” it is suggested that the classic definition be replaced by a updated ‘eco‐evo-evo’ definition of evolution by natural selection which acknowledges this (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16. Sean Carroll (2007). Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo. Journal of the History of Biology 40 (3):594-597.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  17.  10
    Denis M. Walsh (2013). Mechanism, Emergence, and Miscibility: The Autonomy of Evo-Devo. In Philippe Huneman (ed.), Functions: Selection and Mechanisms. Springer 43--65.
  18. Manfred Laubichler & Jane Maienschein (2008). From Embryology to Evo-Devo: A History of Developmental Evolution. Journal of the History of Biology 41 (3):579-582.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  19.  26
    Scott F. Gilbert (2003). Evo-Devo, Devo-Evo, and Devgen-Popgen. Biology and Philosophy 18 (2):347-352.
  20.  13
    Walter Fontana (2002). Modelling 'Evo‐Devo' with RNA. Bioessays 24 (12):1164-1177.
  21.  9
    Erik L. Peterson (2011). The Excluded Philosophy of Evo-Devo? Revisiting CH Waddington's Failed Attempt to Embed Alfred North Whitehead's" Organicism" in Evolutionary Biology. History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (3).
  22.  3
    Adam S. Wilkins (2015). The Evolution of “Evo-Devo”. Bioessays 37 (12):1258-1260.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  6
    Lindsay R. Craig (2015). Neo-Darwinism and Evo-Devo: An Argument for Theoretical Pluralism in Evolutionary Biology. Perspectives on Science 23 (3):243-279.
    The relatively new field of evolutionary developmental biology continues to attract considerable attention from biologists, philosophers, and historians, in part, because work in this field demonstrates that important changes are underway within biology. Though studies of development and evolution were closely connected during the 19th century, continued work in genetics fostered a general split between the two during the first decades of the twentieth century (e.g., Allen 1978; Gilbert 1978; Mayr and Provine 1980; Gilbert, Opitz and..
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  48
    Andrew Hamilton (2009). Toward a Mechanistic Evo Devo. In Manfred Laubichler & Jane Maienschein (eds.), Form and Function in Developmental Evolution. Cambridge University Press
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Jason Scott Robert (2008). Evo-devo. In Michael Ruse (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  26.  6
    Courtney Babbitt, Matt Giorgianni & Alivia Price (2002). Evo-Devo Comes Into Focus. Bioessays 24 (7):677-679.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27.  8
    Bradford McCall (2012). The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. By Ron Amundson. Pp. Xiii, 280, Cambridge University Press, 2007, $26.99. [REVIEW] Heythrop Journal 53 (5):870-871.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  1
    Constanza Alexandra Rendón & Guillermo Folguera (2014). Evo-devo como disciplina integradora: la temporalidad de los procesos biológicos como estrategia de análisis. Theoria. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 29 (3):395.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  3
    Peter Bowler (2007). The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: The Roots of Evo-Devo. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 40 (3):460-462.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  10
    Ronald A. Jenner (2009). From Embryology to Evo-Devo: A History of Developmental Evolution (Review). Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 52 (3):458-462.
  31.  12
    Manfred D. Laubichler (2006). Does EvoDevo Equal Regulatory Evolution?: Endless Forms Most Beautiful: The New Science of Evo Devo and the Making of the Animal Kingdom Sean B. Carroll New York and London : Norton , 2005 (350 Pp; $25.95 Hbk; ISBN 0393060160); From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design (2nd Ed.) Sean B. Carroll , Jennifer K. Grenier , Scott D. Weatherbee Malden, MA : Blackwell , 2004 (258 Pp; $49.95 Pbk; ISBN 1405119500). [REVIEW] Biological Theory 1 (1):102-103.
  32.  13
    Michael Ruse (2005). Evo-Devo: A New Evolutionary Paradigm? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 80 (56):8-.
  33. Sergi Balari Ravera & Guillermo José Lorenzo González (2010). La biología evo-devo, el crecimiento del cerebro y la evolución del lenguaje. Ludus Vitalis 18 (33):49-78.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  3
    Anne Buchanan (2010). Quirks of Human Anatomy: An Evo‐Devo Look at the Human Body. Bioessays 32 (6):537-538.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  13
    Alan C. Love (2005). Review of Ron Amundson, The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo-Devo. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2005 (10).
  36.  3
    Andrew L. Hamilton (2009). Toward a Mechanistic Evo Devo. In Manfred Laubichler & Jane Maienschein (eds.), Form and Function in Developmental Evolution. Cambridge University Press 213.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  3
    M. Simon (2006). Evo-Devo, Modularity, and Evolvability: Insights for Cultural Evolution. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (4).
  38.  1
    Richard Burian (2009). From Embryology to Evo‐Devo: A History of Developmental Evolution. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 100:178-180.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  1
    Jean S. Deutsch (2001). Evo/Devo Coming to Age: The First Textbook. Bioessays 23 (8):757-758.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  2
    Manfred D. Laubichler (2009). Form and Function in Evo Devo: Historical and Conceptual Reflections. In Manfred Laubichler & Jane Maienschein (eds.), Form and Function in Developmental Evolution. Cambridge University Press 10.
  41.  1
    Laura Nuño De La Rosa García & Arantza Etxeberria, Pattern and Process in Evo-Devo.
    In the Modern Synthesis the study of patterns refers to how to identify and systematize order in lineages (description), attributed to underlying processes or mechanisms (explanation). But patterns and processes play distinct roles in evodevo. In this paper we (1) distinguish three different views (the transformational, the morphogenetic and the process approach) according to the role they play in the description and explanation of development and evolution, and (2) relate this discussion to the issues of homology and variation.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Peter J. Bowler (2007). Ron Amundson, The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: The Roots of Evo-Devo. Cambridge Studies in Philosophy and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Pp. Xiii+280. ISBN 0-521-80699-2. $75.00. [REVIEW] British Journal for the History of Science 40 (3):460.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Richard Burian (2009). Manfred D. Laubichler; Jane Maienschein .From Embryology to Evo‐Devo: A History of Developmental Evolution.Vii + 569 Pp., Figs., Tables, Index. Cambridge, Mass./London: MIT Press, 2007. $55. [REVIEW] Isis 100 (1):178-180.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Frederick B. Churchill (2006). Ron Amundson.The Changing Role of the Embryo in Evolutionary Thought: Roots of Evo‐Devo. Xiii + 280 Pp., Index. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. $75. [REVIEW] Isis 97 (2):375-375.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Verónica S. Di Stilio (2011). Empowering Plant Evo-Devo: Virus Induced Gene Silencing Validates New and Emerging Model Systems. Bioessays 33 (9):711-718.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Marco Fenici (2008). Forme del divenire. Evo‐devo: la biologia evoluzionistica dello sviluppo - Alessandro Minelli. [REVIEW] Humana.Mente 6.
    No categories
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Michael Ruse (2005). Evo-Devo: A New Evolutionary Paradigm? Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 56:8-9.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  6
    Anton Reiner & Mario F. Wullimann (2004). The Gain in the Brain is Plain When Evo Meets Devo. Bioessays 26 (9):1026-1030.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  4
    Jonathan Cooke (1992). Nato‐Limbo‐Devo‐Evo. Developmental Patterning of the Vertebrate Limb (Nato Asi Series A: Life Sciences Vol. 205) (1991). Edited by J. Richard Hinchcliffe. Juan M. Hurle and Dennis Summerbell. Plenum Publishing Co., New York and London. $115 in Usa/Canada, $138 Outside, $82.65 Uk. Pp. XI+452. Isbn 0‐306‐43927‐1. [REVIEW] Bioessays 14 (11):793-793.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Massimo Pigliucci (2013). Between Holism and Reductionism: A Philosophical Primer on Emergence. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 112 (2):261-267.
    Ever since Darwin a great deal of the conceptual history of biology may be read as a struggle between two philosophical positions: reductionism and holism. On the one hand, we have the reductionist claim that evolution has to be understood in terms of changes at the fundamental causal level of the gene. As Richard Dawkins famously put it, organisms are just ‘lumbering robots’ in the service of their genetic masters. On the other hand, there is a long holistic tradition that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 162