Search results for 'exemplary political judgment' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  35
    Mihaela Mihai (2013). When the State Says “Sorry”: State Apologies as Exemplary Political Judgments. Journal of Political Philosophy 21 (2):200-220.
    This paper aims to offer an account of state apologies that discloses their potential function as catalysing political acts within broader processes of democratic change. While lots of ink has been spilled on analysing the relationship between apologies and processes of recognising the victims and their descendants, more needs to be said about how apologies can challenge the presence of self-congratulatory, distorted visions of history within the public sphere of liberal democracies. My account will be delineated through a critical (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  60
    Avery Goldman (2010). An Antinomy of Political Judgment: Kant, Arendt, and the Role of Purposiveness in Reflective Judgment. Continental Philosophy Review 43 (3):331-352.
    This article builds on Arendt’s development of a Kantian politics from out of the conception of reflective judgment in the Critique of Judgment. Arendt looks to Kant’s analysis of the beautiful to explain how political thought can be conceived. And yet Arendt describes such Kantian reflection as an empirical undertaking that justifies itself only in relation to the abstract principle of the moral law. The problem for such an account is that the autonomy of the moral law (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  36
    Ricardo Blaug (2000). Citizenship and Political Judgment: Between Discourse Ethics and Phronesis. Res Publica 6 (2):179-198.
    Political judgment is notoriously hard to theorise, and in the recent debates surrounding Habermas's discourse ethics we encounter classic disagreements around the nature, operation and validity of such judgments. This paper evaluates Habermas's account of political judgment and explores the problems raised by his critics. It then focuses on the contentious role played by universals within his account. What emerges is a reformulated theory of judgment based on the thin universalism of fair deliberation, and a (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  17
    Albena Azmanova (2012). The Scandal of Reason: A Critical Theory of Political Judgment. Columbia University Press.
    Preface -- Introduction: the scandal of reason and the paradox of judgment -- Political judgment and the vocation of critical theory -- Critical theory: political judgment as ideologiekritik -- Philosophical liberalism: reasonable judgment -- Liberalism and critical theory in dispute -- Judgment unbound: Arendt -- From critique of power to a theory of critical judgment -- The political epistemology of judgment -- The critical consensus model -- Judgment, criticism, innovation (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  13
    Henrik Kaare Nielsen (2012). Aesthetic Judgement and Political Judgement. Nordic Journal of Aesthetics 23 (43).
    Prominent positions in the contemporary theoretical field of the humanities tend to conceptualize late modern communities in general as aesthetic communities of taste. In regard to political communities, this means reducing the political to an implication of the aesthetic discourse. This article argues for addressing the aesthetic and the political as distinct discourses that are, on the other hand, always engaged with each other in a conflictual interplay. Both discourses draw on and appeal to the ability of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  2
    Maša Mrovlje (forthcoming). Forgiveness, Representative Judgement and Love of the World: Exploring the Political Significance of Forgiveness in the Context of Transitional Justice and Reconciliation Debates. Philosophia:1-20.
    The article examines the political challenge and significance of forgiveness as an indispensable response to the inherently imperfect and tragic nature of political life through the lens of the existential, narrative-inspired judging sensibility. While the political significance of forgiveness has been broadly recognized in transitional justice and reconciliation contexts, the question of its importance and appropriateness in the wake of grave injustice and suffering has commonly been approached through constructing a self-centred, rule-based framework, defining forgiveness in terms (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  13
    Alessandro Ferrara (1999). Justice and Judgment: The Rise and the Prospect of the Judgment Model in Contemporary Political Philosophy. Sage.
    This text is an integrated and comprehensive account of theories of justice and judgement in contemporary political and moral philosophy. It offers a critical examination of judgement and normative validity in the recent works of Rawls, Habermas, Ackerman, Michaleman, and Dworkin. Ferrara demonstrates how the understanding of justice and normative validity, since the linguistic turn in philosophy, is defined in terms of reflective judgement. This demonstration comprises of an historical overview of the judgement model in contemporary political philosophy (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Ronald Beiner (1980). Hannah Arendt's Contribution to a Theory of Political Judgement.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  78
    Mathias Thaler (2011). Political Judgment Beyond Paralysis and Heroism. European Journal of Political Theory 10 (2):225–253.
    This paper seeks to contribute to the literature on political judgment by proposing that the faculty of judgment is essential for responsibly coping with the undeniable fact of distant suffering and the controversial duty of humanitarian intervention. To achieve this end, Mahmood Mamdani’s text ‘The Politics of Naming: Genocide, Civil War, Insurgency’ will be mobilized for a constructive dialogue about which specific conception of political judgment is at stake when we debate a situation like Darfur (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  4
    L. M. Atkison (2016). Antigones Remainders: Choral Ruminations and Political Judgment. Political Theory 44 (2):219-239.
    This paper reads Antigone from the perspective of the Chorus. Whereas most interpreters read Antigone from the perspective of Creon and Antigone’s respective laws, I maintain that the protagonists represent laws that are distinctly apolitical. Alternatively, I argue that the Chorus make the polis—past, present, and future—the center of their thought and action and are therefore uniquely political. Through close attention to the Chorus’s composition as a body that is both one and many at the same time, and by (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  3
    George E. Marcus, W. Russell Neuman & Michael MacKuen (2000). Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. University of Chicago Press.
    Remarkably accessible, Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment urges social scientists to move beyond the idealistic notion of the purely rational citizen to form a more complete, realistic model that includes the emotional side of ...
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  12.  39
    Majid Yar (2000). From Actor to Spectator: Hannah Arendt's 'Two Theories' of Political Judgment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 26 (2):1-27.
    The question of judgment has become one of the central problems in recent social, political and ethical thought. This paper explores Hannah Arendt's decisive contribution to this debate by attempting to reconstruct analytically two distinctive perspectives on judgment from the corpus of her writings. By exploring her relation to Aristotelian and Kantian sources, and by uncovering debts and parallels to key thinkers such as Benjamin and Heidegger, it is argued that Arendt's work pinpoints the key antinomy within (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13. Peter J. Steinberger (1993). The Concept of Political Judgment. University of Chicago Press.
    What is good political judgment? Is it a science subject to strict standards of logic and inference, or is it more like an art, the product of intuition, feeling, or even chance? Peter J. Steinberger shows how the seemingly contradictory claims of inference and intuition are reconciled in the concept of political judgment. Resting his argument on the larger notion of judgment itself, Steinberger develops an original model of how political judgments are made and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14. Karin A. Fry (2002). In the Spirit of Kant: Political Judgment in Arendt and Lyotard. Dissertation, The University of Memphis
    My dissertation is an exploration of two theories of political judgment that are inspired by Kant's Critique of Judgment. Both Hannah Arendt and Jean Francois Lyotard appropriate different versions of Kantian reflective judgment as a model for making political decisions because it allows for differences in thought and action, and does not reduce politics to a fabrication guided by a universal conception. This dissertation examines the viability of both theories of judgment, and assesses the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. Raymond Geuss (2009). What is Political Judgement? In Richard Bourke, Raymond Geuss & John Dunn (eds.), Political Judgement: Essays for John Dunn. Cambridge University Press 29--46.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  4
    Richard Bourke, Raymond Geuss & John Dunn (eds.) (2009). Political Judgement: Essays for John Dunn. Cambridge University Press.
    This book by leading international scholars in the fields of history, philosophy and politics restores the subject to a place at the very centre of political theory and practice.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  56
    Mark C. Murphy (1997). Surrender of Judgment and the Consent Theory of Political Authority. Law and Philosophy 16 (2):115 - 143.
    The aim of this paper is to take the first steps toward providing a refurbished consent theory of political authority, one that rests in part on a reconception of the relationship between the surrender of judgment and the authoritativeness of political institutions. On the standard view, whatever grounds political authority implies that one ought to surrender one's judgment to that of one's political institutions. On the refurbished view, it is the surrender of one's (...) – which can plausibly be considered a form of consent – that makes political institutions practically authoritative. (shrink)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  6
    M. Mihai (2016). Theorizing Change: Between Reflective Judgment and the Inertia of Political Habitus. European Journal of Political Theory 15 (1):22-42.
    In an effort to delineate a more plausible account of political change, this paper reads Pierre Bourdieu’s social theory as a corrective to exaggerated enthusiasm about the emancipatory force of reflection. This revised account valorizes both Bourdieu’s insights into the acquired, embodied, durable nature of the political habitus and judgment theorists’ trust in individuals’ reflection as a perpetual force of novelty and spontaneity in the public sphere of democratic societies. The main purpose of this exercise is to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Lawrence Hamilton (2009). Human Needs and Political Judgment. In Boudewijn Paul de Bruin & Christopher F. Zurn (eds.), New Waves in Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Lawrence Hamilton (2009). Human Needs and Political Judgment Lawrence Hamilton. In Boudewijn Paul de Bruin & Christopher F. Zurn (eds.), New Waves in Political Philosophy. Palgrave Macmillan 40.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21. J. R. Martel (2008). Review Essays: Who Am I to Judge?: The Heart of Judgment: Practical Wisdom, Neuroscience, and Narrative, by Leslie Paul Thiele. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2006. 321 Pp. $85.00 . Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? By Philip E. Tetlock. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005. 321 Pp. $19.95. [REVIEW] Political Theory 37 (2):290-295.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22. Joseph M. Schwartz (1995). CHAPTER 5. Lenin on the Sciences of Consciousness and Production: The Abolition of Political Judgment. In The Permanence of the Political: A Democratic Critique of the Radical Impulse to Transcend Politics. Princeton University Press 146-188.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  28
    Dann G. Fisher & John T. Sweeney (1998). The Relationship Between Political Attitudes and Moral Judgment: Examining the Validity of the Defining Issues Test. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 17 (8):905-916.
    Most ethics studies employing accounting subjects have utilized the Defining Issues Test, generally finding the moral judgment abilities of accounting students and accountants to be less advanced than those of the general population. This study assesses the validity of the DIT by examining whether an individual can achieve a higher moral judgment score on the DIT by responding from the role of a political liberal. Accounting undergraduates, defining themselves as liberal, moderate or conservative, completed the DIT once (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  24.  60
    A. Degryse (2011). Sensus Communis as a Foundation for Men as Political Beings: Arendt's Reading of Kant's Critique of Judgment. Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (3):345-358.
    In the literature on Hannah Arendt’s Lectures on Kant’s Political Philosophy, two sorts of claim have been made by different interpreters. First, there is Beiner’s observation that there is a shift in Arendt’s thoughts on judgment, which has led to the idea that Arendt develops two distinct theories of judgment. The second sort of claim concerns Arendt’s use of Kant’s transcendental principles. At its core, it has led to the critique that Arendt detranscendentalizes — or empiricalizes — (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  17
    Michael L. Gross (1997). Ethics and Activism: The Theory and Practice of Political Morality. Cambridge University Press.
    Responsible citizens are expected to combine ethical judgement with judiciously exercised social activism to preserve the moral foundation of democratic society and prevent political injustice. But do they? Utilizing a research model integrating insights from rational choice theory and cognitive developmental psychology this book carefully explores three exemplary cases of morally inspired activism: Jewish rescue in wartime Europe, abortion politics in the United States, and peace and settler activism in Israel. From all three analyses a single conclusion emerges: (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  26.  44
    Torjus Midtgarden (2013). Practice, Judgement, and the Challenge of Moral and Political Disagreement: A Pragmatist Account by Roberto Frega (Review). Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 49 (1):112-117.
    Roberto Frega’s Practice, Judgement, and the Challenge of Moral and Political Disagreement is exegetically, as well as systematically, ambitious: it explores several key texts of Charles Peirce and John Dewey in order to develop a pragmatist conception of practical rationality in the context of contemporary moral and political philosophy. Frega’s book differs from other recent comparable contributions, such as those of Cheryl Misak, Eric MacGilvray, and Robert Talisse, by drawing most heavily on Dewey’s works. Yet, similar to Misak, (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  37
    Roberto Frega (2012). Practice, Judgment, and the Challenge of Moral and Political Disagreement: A Pragmatist Account. Lexington Books.
    Introduction -- Inquiry as the logic of practical reasoning -- From reasoning to judgment -- Expressive inquiry -- The public sphere -- Pragmatism, pluralism, and the fact of relativism -- A pragmatic theory of objectivity -- Why justification matters? -- Pragmatism as an epistemology of practice.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  28.  4
    Luke Bretherton (2012). Coming to Judgment: Methodological Reflections on the Relationship Between Ecclesiology, Ethnography and Political Theory. Modern Theology 28 (2):167-196.
    This essay theoretically frames the inter‐relationship between ecclesial and political life and suggests how the ethnographic study of this intersection might generate theological conceptualisations of both. It argues there is a dialectical relationship between conceptualisations of ecclesial and political life and that their proper study requires attention to practice in order to generate judgments on both. The key issue here is the kind of rationality from which judgments on practice are derived. A case is made for practical reason (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. C. M. (1997). Surrender of Judgment and the Consent Theory of Political Authority. Law and Philosophy 16 (2):115-143.
    The aim of this paper is to take the first steps toward providing a refurbished consent theory of political authority, one that rests in part on a reconception of the relationship between the surrender of judgment and the authoritativeness of political institutions. On the standard view, whatever grounds political authority implies that one ought to surrender one's judgment to that of one's political institutions. On the refurbished view, it is the surrender of one's (...) ndash which can plausibly be considered a form of consent ndash that makes political institutions practically authoritative. (shrink)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  7
    David Owen, Genealogy as Exemplary Critique: Reflections on Foucault and the Imagination of the Political.
    This paper suggests that genealogy is an exemplary form of critique. The stakes of this argument are established in the course of on intial response to critics of genealogy such as Habermas and Fraser throght the distinguishing of legislative and exemplary forms or critique. The essay then goes on to to show how Foucault's central concern, namely, the relation of humanism and bio-power, leads him to articulate an ethics of creativity which exhibits an ethods of ironic heroization and (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Joshua Mills-Knutsen (2011). Kant's Critique of Judgment and Its Political Potential. Gnosis 11 (3):1-21.
    Rousseau’s influence on Kant in the realm of ethical theory is well established. Just as Kant credits Hume with inspiring his critique of metaphysics, Kant admits a debt to Rousseau as an inspiration for his egalitarian approach to ethics. There is reason to suspect, however, that Rousseau’s influence extends beyond the realm of ethics, and into Kant’s Critique of Judgment. While ostensibly a work about aesthetic and teleological judgment stemming from the line of aesthetic thought that includes the (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  6
    Meili Steele (2002). Arendt Versus Ellison on Little Rock: The Role of Language in Political Judgment. Constellations 9 (2):184-206.
  33.  15
    Philip E. Tetlock (2010). Second Thoughts Aboutexpert Political Judgment:Reply to the Symposium. Critical Review 22 (4):467-488.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  7
    K. Hutchings (1997). Moral Deliberation and Political Judgement: Reflections on Benhabib's Interactive Universalism. Theory, Culture and Society 14 (1):131-142.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  10
    Fred R. Dallmayr (1988). Between Kant and Aristotle: Beiner's Political Judgment. New Vico Studies 6:147-154.
  36.  14
    Kevin Olson (2013). Judgment or Justification? Two Paths for Rethinking the Discursive Turn On Albena Azmanova, The Scandal of Reason: A Critical Theory of Political Judgment. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012 and Rainer Forst, The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice, Trans. Jeffrey Flynn. New York: Columbia University Press, 2012. [REVIEW] Constellations 20 (2):361-365.
  37.  9
    Aletta J. Norval (2008). A Democratic Politics of Acknowledgement: Political Judgment, Imagination, and Exemplarity. Diacritics 38 (4):59-76.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  26
    Kyriaki Goudeli (2003). Kants Reflective Judgment: The Normalisation of Political Judgment. Kant-Studien 94 (1):51-68.
  39.  3
    Geoff Wells (1997). The Aesthetics of Political Judgment. The European Legacy 2 (3):523-529.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  1
    Oliver Feltham (forthcoming). A Pragmatics of Political Judgment in Advance. Philosophy Today.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  3
    Michael E. Snyder (2013). The Scandal of Reason: A Critical Theory of Political Judgment. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 21 (4):617 - 622.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  4
    Tracy B. Strong (1995). The Concept of Political Judgment. History of European Ideas 21 (4):581-582.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  2
    Eric L. Weislogel (1990). The Irony of Richard Rorty and the Question of Political Judgment. Philosophy Today 34 (4):303-311.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  1
    James P. Clarke (1994). A Kantian Theory of Political Judgement. Philosophy Today 38 (2):135-148.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Howard Caygill (2000). Levinas’s Political Judgement: The Esprit Articles 1934–1983. Radical Philosophy 104.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Fred R. Dallmayr (1988). Between Kant and Aristotle: Ronald Beiner's "Political Judgment": Review of Ronald Beiner, "Political Judgment". [REVIEW] New Vico Studies 6:145.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Oliver Feltham (2016). A Pragmatics of Political Judgment. Philosophy Today 60 (1):45-70.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. John Forester (1996). Beyond Dialogue to Transformative Learning: How Deliberative Rituals Encourage Political Judgment in Community Planning Processes. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 46:295-334.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Raymond Geuss (2009). I. Political Judgment in Its Historical Context. In Politics and the Imagination. Princeton University Press 1-16.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Lawrence Hamilton (2006). Needs, Rights and Political Judgement: Replies to Commentators. South African Journal of Philosophy 25 (3):258-270.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000