72 found
Order:
See also:
  1.  80
    Axel Gosseries (2004). Historical Emissions and Free-Riding. Ethical Perspectives 11 (1):36-60.
    Should the current members of a community compensate the victims of their ancestor’s emissions of greenhouse gases? I argue that the previous generation of polluters may not have been morally responsible for the harms they caused.I also accept the view that the polluters’ descendants cannot be morally responsible for their ancestor’s harmful emissions. However, I show that, while granting this, a suitably defined notion of moral free-riding may still account for the moral obligation of the polluters’ descendants to compensate the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   14 citations  
  2.  76
    Axel Gosseries (2008). On Future Generations' Future Rights. Journal of Political Philosophy 16 (4):446-474.
  3.  56
    A. Demertzi, E. Racine, M.-A. Bruno, D. Ledoux, O. Gosseries, A. Vanhaudenhuyse, M. Thonnard, A. Soddu, G. Moonen & S. Laureys (2013). Pain Perception in Disorders of Consciousness: Neuroscience, Clinical Care, and Ethics in Dialogue. [REVIEW] Neuroethics 6 (1):37-50.
    Pain, suffering and positive emotions in patients in vegetative state/unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (VS/UWS) and minimally conscious states (MCS) pose clinical and ethical challenges. Clinically, we evaluate behavioural responses after painful stimulation and also emotionally-contingent behaviours (e.g., smiling). Using stimuli with emotional valence, neuroimaging and electrophysiology technologies can detect subclinical remnants of preserved capacities for pain which might influence decisions about treatment limitation. To date, no data exist as to how healthcare providers think about end-of-life options (e.g., withdrawal of artificial nutrition (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  4.  7
    F. Gaspart & A. Gosseries (2007). Are Generational Savings Unjust? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):193-217.
    In this article, we explore the implications of a Rawlsian theory for intergenerational issues. First, we confront Rawls's way of locating his `just savings' principle in his Theory of Justice with an alternative way of doing so. We argue that both sides of his intergenerational principle, as they apply to the accumulation phase and the steady-state stage, can be dealt with on the bases, respectively, of the principle of equal liberty and of the difference principle. We then proceed by focusing (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  5. Ole Fritjof Norheim, Trygve Ottersen, Bonah Chitah, Richard Cookson, Norman Daniels, Nir Eyal, Walter Flores, Axel Gosseries, Daniel Hausman, Samia Hurst, Lydia Kapiriri, Toby Ord, Shlomi Segall, Frehiwot Defaye & Alex Voorhoeve (2014). Making Fair Choices on the Path to Universal Health Coverage. World Health Organisation.
    This report by the WHO Consultative Group on Equity and Universal Health Coverage addresses how countries can make fair progress towards the goal of universal coverage. It explains the relevant tradeoffs between different desirable ends and offers guidance on how to make these tradeoffs.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  6.  30
    Axel Gosseries (2001). What Do We Owe the Next Generation(S)? Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review 35 (1):293-354.
  7.  16
    Axel Gosseries (2004). Penser la Justice Entre les Générations. De l'Affaire Perruche À la Réforme des Retraites. Aubier (Flammarion).
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  8.  18
    Athina Demertzi, Eric Racine, Marie-Aurélie Bruno, Didier Ledoux, Olivia Gosseries, Audrey Vanhaudenhuyse, Marie Thonnard, Andrea Soddu, Gustave Moonen & Steven Laureys (forthcoming). Pain Perception in Disorders of Consciousness: Neuroscience, Clinical Care, and Ethics in Dialogue. Neuroethics.
  9.  30
    Axel Gosseries (2008). Theories of Intergenerational Justice: A Synopsis. Surv. Perspect. Integr. Environ. Soc 1:39-49.
    In this paper, the author offers a synoptic view of different theories of intergenerational justice, along two dimensions (savings/dissavings) and three modalities (prohibition, authorisation, obligation). After presenting successively the indirect reciprocity, the mutual advantage, the utilitarian and the Lockean approaches, special attention is given to the egalitarian theory of intergenerational justice. Two key differences between the egalitarian view on intergenerational justice and the sufficientarian interpretation of sustainability are highlighted.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10.  38
    Axel Gosseries (2007). Cosmopolitan Luck Egalitarianism and the Greenhouse Effect. Canadian Journal of Philosophy (sup1):279-309.
  11.  14
    Axel Gosseries & Frédéric Gaspart (2007). Are Generational Savings Unjust? Politics, Philosophy and Economics 6 (2):193-217.
    In this article, we explore the implications of a Rawlsian theory for intergenerational issues. First, we confront Rawls's way of locating his `just savings' principle in his Theory of Justice with an alternative way of doing so. We argue that both sides of his intergenerational principle, as they apply to the accumulation phase and the steady-state stage, can be dealt with on the bases, respectively, of the principle of equal liberty (and its priority) and of the difference principle. We then (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  12.  26
    Axel Gosseries (2008). Constitutions and Future Generations. The Good Society 17 (2):32-37.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13.  7
    David Alvarez, Axel Gosseries, Martin Marchman Andersen, Lasse Nielsen, David V. Axelsen, Daniel Weinstock & Shlomi Segall (2012). Symposium & Debate. Ethical Perspectives 19 (2):277-334.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  14
    Axel Gosseries (2004). Are Seniority Privileges Unfair? Economics and Philosophy 20 (2):279-305.
    What should maximin egalitarians think about seniority privileges? We contrast a good-specific and an all-things-considered perspective. As to the former, inertia and erasing effects of a seniority-based allocation of benefits from employment are identified, allowing us to spot the categories of workers and job-seekers made involuntarily worse off by such a practice. What matters however is to find out whether abolishing seniority privileges will bring about a society in which the all-things-considered worst off people are better off than in the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  15.  44
    Olivia Gosseries, Erik Ziegler, Steven Laureys, Aurore Thibaut & Camille Chatelle, Spasticity After Stroke: Physiology, Assessment and Treatment.
    Background: Spasticity following a stroke occurs in about 30% of patients. The mechanisms underlying this disorder, however, are not well understood. Method: This review aims to define spasticity, describe hypotheses explaining its development after a stroke, give an overview of related neuroimaging studies as well as a description of the most common scales used to quantify the degree of spasticity and finally explore which treatments are currently being used to treat this disorder.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  5
    Axel Gosseries (2011). Qu'est-ce que le suffisantisme ? Philosophiques 38 (2):465-491.
    La présente contribution vise à offrir au lecteur une présentation de la doctrine suffisantiste de la justice, de ses justifications générales et spécifiques et de son articulation possible avec d’autres théories de la justice. Elle explore certains aspects plus particuliers tels que la place de la responsabilité en son sein, son applicabilité au domaine intergénérationnel ou son positionnement par rapport à la question des « vies-complètes ». Elle montre aussi en quoi, quelles que soient les faiblesses possibles de cette doctrine, (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  17.  6
    Axel Gosseries (2015). Introduction: Representing Future Generations? Jurisprudence 6 (3):492-495.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  49
    Axel Gosseries (2012). Equality and Non-Discrimination in Hiring - Introduction. Journal of Moral Philosophy 9 (1):3-7.
    In this introduction, the author briefly presents the way in which Clayton, Segall and Lippert-Rasmussen deal with what egalitarianism has to say about non-discrimination in hiring. Parallels and differences between their approaches are stressed.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  20
    Axel Gosseries (2008). Radiological Protection and Intergenerational Justice. In G. Eggermont & B. Feltz (eds.), Ethics and Radiological Protection. Academia-Bruylant
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  25
    Axel Gosseries (2007). Should They Honor the Promises of Their Parents' Leaders? Ethics and International Affairs 21 (s1):99-125.
    Should the foreign debt of the world’s poorest countries be cancelled? In this essay, I am concerned with whether a generational perspective makes a difference in answering this question. I will show that it does, and that alternative accounts of repayment obligations are possible. I argue that a distributive theory of justice is not only appropriate to address the challenges to justice raised by long-term sovereign indebtedness, but that it is also superior to the solution offered by the odious debt (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  25
    Axel Gosseries (forthcoming). Cosmopolitan Luck Egalitarianism and Climate Change. Canadian Journal of Philosophy.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  55
    Axel Gosseries (2003). Intergenerational Justice. In LaFollette H. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. Oxford University Press
    Is it fair to leave the next generation a public debt? Is it defensible to impose legal rules on them through constitutional constraints? From combating climate change to ensuring proper funding for future pensions, concerns about ethics between generations are everywhere. In this volume sixteen philosophers explore intergenerational justice. Part One examines the ways in which various theories of justice look at the matter. These include libertarian, Rawlsian, sufficientarian, contractarian, communitarian, Marxian and reciprocity-based approaches. In Part Two, the authors look (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  16
    Axel Gosseries, Publicity. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  24.  1
    Gosseries (2014). What Makes Age Discrimination Special? A Philosophical Look at the ECJ Case Law. Netherlands Journal of Legal Philosophy 43 (1):59-80.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  10
    Axel Gosseries & Mathias Hungerbühler (2006). 6 Rule Change and Intergenerational Justice. In Tremmel J. (ed.), The Handbook of Intergenerational Justice. Edward Elgar 106.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Axel Gosseries (2004). Penser la Justice Entre les Générations. De l'Affaire Perruche À la Réforme des Retraites. Paris,: Aubier , "Alto" Series, 320p. [REVIEW] Aubier (Flammarion).
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  27. Axel Gosseries (2008). How (Un)Fair is Intellectual Property? In Gosseries Axel, Marciano A. & Strowel A. (eds.), Intellectual Property and Theories of Justice. Basingstoke & N.Y.: Palgrave McMillan
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  22
    Axel Gosseries (1998). L'éthique environnementale aujourd'hui. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 96 (3):395-426.
  29.  4
    Axel Gosseries (2002). La justice entre les générations. Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 33 (1):61.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  3
    Axel Gosseries (2015). Introduction: Representing Future Generations? Jurisprudence 6 (3):492-495.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31. Axel Gosseries (2009). Three Models of Intergenerational Reciprocity. In Axel Gosseries & Lukas H. Meyer (eds.), Intergenerational Justice. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  6
    Axel Gosseries (2003). A-t-on des obligations envers les morts? Revue Philosophique De Louvain 101 (1):80-104.
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33.  17
    Axel Gosseries (2005). The Myth of Ownership: Taxes and Justice, by Liam Murphy and Thomas Nagel. Disputatio.
  34. Alex Gosseries (2005). Inter-Generational Justice. In Hugh LaFollette (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Practical Ethics. OUP Oxford
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35.  4
    Axel Gosseries (2015). Les générations, le fleuve et l’océan. Philosophiques 42 (1):153-176.
    Axel Gosseries1 | : À la suggestion de Jefferson,3 nous nous proposons de prendre au sérieux la comparaison entre nations et générations dans le cadre d’une théorie philosophique de la justice et de la démocratie préoccupée par nos devoirs envers les membres d’autres générations. Nous nous concentrons ici sur trois des caractéristiques propres aux relations intergénérationnelles, à travers une comparaison avec des situations internationales spécifiques. La première a trait à l’immobilité temporelle des personnes au delà de la période s’étendant de (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  25
    Axel Gosseries (2006). Democracy and Transparency. Swiss Political Science Review 12 (3):83-90.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  25
    Axel Gosseries (2009). La Question Générationnelle Et l'Héritage Rawlsien. Raisons Politiques (34):31-56.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  21
    Axel Gosseries (2002). La justice entre les générations. Faut-il renoncer au maximin intergénérationnel ? Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 107 (1):61-81.
    For maximin egalitarians, the intergene rational context raises a threefold challenge. First, doesn't intergenerational maximin simply require a prohibition on dissavings, as a commutative conception of justice based on indirect reciprocity does ? Second, shouldn't we take seriously the aggregative worries of utilitarians in order not to remain eternally stuck into misery. Thus, shouldn't we abandon maximin ? Third, don't we find ourselves in a context where standard egalitarianism and maximin egalitarianism would coincide ? The A. provides a negative answer (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  10
    Axel Gosseries (2011). A Justiça Intergeracional E A Metáfora Do Refúgio de Montanha. Philosophica 38:121-141.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  21
    Axel Gosseries (2003). A Case for Restricted Access. Journal of Information Ethics, 12 (1):56-66.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  21
    Axel Gosseries (2009). Left-Libertarianism and Left-Hobbesianism. Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 65 (1/4):197-215.
    This paper provides a comparative analysis of the way in which, as well as the extent to which, two key variables potentially allow for the development of more left-wing versions of libertarianism and hobbesianism. It turns out that hobbesianism, while disposing of ways to extend the scope of what should be seen as the “cooperative surplus”, is in trouble when it comes to justifying “equal division” as a general rule to divide up such a surplus. In contrast, libertarianism can meaningfully (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  6
    Axel Gosseries (2014). The Intergenerational Case for Constitutional Rigidity. Ratio Juris 27 (4):528-539.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43.  6
    Nir Eyal & Axel Gosseries (2013). Obamacare and Conscientious Objection. Ethical Perspectives 20 (1):109-117.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Axel Gosseries (2002). The Demands of Consequentialism. European Journal of Philosophy 10 (2):251-254.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  2
    Axel Gosseries (2001). Christine Tappolet, Émotions et valeurs. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 99 (3):507-511.
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  2
    Axel Gosseries (2001). Global Justice. Edited by Thomas Pogge. Revue Philosophique De Louvain 99 (3):519-521.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  2
    Axel Gosseries (2003). Émissions historiques et free-riding. Archives de Philosophie du Droit 47:301-331.
    Doit-on attendre des membres actuels d'une communauté qu'ils compensent les victimes des émissions de gaz à effet de serre causées par leurs ancêtres? Nous défendons l'idée que les générations précédentes de pollueurs peuvent très bien ne pas être mo-ralement responsables des dommages qu'elles ont causés. Et nous acceptons aussi la position selon laquelle les descendants d'une génération de pollueurs ne sauraient être tenus pour res-ponsables des dommages engendrés par leurs ancêtres. Il n'en subsiste pas moins que même si l'on effectue (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  9
    Axel Gosseries (2003). Book Review: Wilfried Beckerman & Joana Pasek, Justice, Posterity and the Environment. [REVIEW] Ethics 113 (2):391-393.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  1
    Marie-Christine Nizzi, Athena Demertzi, Olivia Gosseries, Marie-Aurélie Bruno, François Jouen & Steven Laureys (2012). From Armchair to Wheelchair: How Patients with a Locked-in Syndrome Integrate Bodily Changes in Experienced Identity. Consciousness and Cognition 21 (1):431-437.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50.  8
    Axel Gosseries (2001). Child Versus Childmaker: Future Persons and Present Duties in Ethics and the Law (Review). [REVIEW] Ethics and the Environment 6 (2):114-118.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 72