Search results for 'illocutionary act' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Adjr Act (forthcoming). 75B of the TP Act (Gleeson CJ, Gummow, Hayne, Heydon, Cren-Nan JJ). Migration-Refugee Status-Fear of" Serious Harm" In VBAO V MIMIA [2006] HCA 60;(14 December 2006) the High Court Concluded That the Reference to the Threat of Serious. [REVIEW] Ethos.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Trade Practises Act (forthcoming). ACT Administrative Appeals Tribunal Decisions. Ethos.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. An Act (1983). The Louisiana Creationism Act (1981). In J. Peter Zetterberg (ed.), Evolution Versus Creationism: The Public Education Controversy. Oryx Press. 394.score: 180.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Christopher New (1988). Permissions And Illocutionary Act Taxonomy. Analysis 48 (October):209-216.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Dorota Rybarkiewicz (2002). Is Metaphor an Illocutionary Act? Bulletin of the Section of Logic 31 (1):47-57.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Paul J. Hoven (1988). Legal Argumentation as an Illocutionary Act Complex: A Critical Analysis. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 1 (1):29-45.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Amy Tsui (1987). Aspects of the Classification of Illocutionary Acts and the Notion of the Perlocutionary Act. Semiotica 66 (4):359-378.score: 130.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. G. Lanemercier (1996). Voice, Identities, Responsibilities, the Role of Illocutionary Scenarios in the Act of Reading. Semiotica 110 (3-4):231-271.score: 120.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Mark Siebel (2003). Illocutionary Acts and Attitude Expression. Linguistics and Philosophy 26 (3):351-366.score: 100.0
    In the classic Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts,Kent Bach and Robert M. Harnish advocated the idea that to perform an illocutionary actoften just means to express certain attitudes. The underlying definition of attitudeexpression, however, gives rise to serious problems because it requires intentions of a peculiarkind. Recently, Wayne Davis has proposed a different analysis of attitude expression whichis not subject to these difficulties and thus promises a more plausible account of illocutions.It will be shown, however, that this account is (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Friedrich Christoph Dörge, Illocutionary Acts : Austin's Account and What Searle Made Out of It.score: 100.0
    As is shown in the introduction of the book, the notion "illocutionary act" is used with quite a number of essentially different meanings; consequently, it is quite unclear what an "illocutionary act" is actually supposed to be. This problem is the starting point of the thesis. An argument is stated, to the effect that the introduction and use of scholarly terms like, for instance, "illocutionary act", or "performative sentence", is not entirely arbitrary. It is argued that technical (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Vera Peetz (1975). Ifs, Hooks and Illocutionary Acts. Analysis 36 (1):13 - 17.score: 100.0
    "ifs", Apart from counterfactuals, Are considered in the context of illocutionary acts. First, Austin's distinction between normal/causal "ifs" and stipulative "ifs" is amended to: normal/causal "ifs" contrapose within the context of the illocutionary act, Stipulative "ifs" do not. Using this criterion, Normal/causal "ifs" are found only in the contents of austin's classes of verdictives and expositives, And in some behabitives; stipulative "ifs" are found in exercitives and commissives and in some behabitives. But all types of illocutionary act (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Gila Sher & Cory D. Wright (2007). Truth as a Normative Modality of Cognitive Acts. In Geo Siegwart & Dirk Griemann (eds.), Truth and Speech Acts: Studies in the Philosophy of Language. Routledge. 5--280.score: 84.0
    Attention to the conversational role of alethic terms seems to dominate, and even sometimes exhaust, many contemporary analyses of the nature of truth. Yet, because truth plays a role in judgment and assertion regardless of whether alethic terms are expressly used, such analyses cannot be comprehensive or fully adequate. A more general analysis of the nature of truth is therefore required – one which continues to explain the significance of truth independently of the role alethic terms play in discourse. We (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Tomoyuki Yamada (2008). Logical Dynamics of Some Speech Acts That Affect Obligations and Preferences. Synthese 165 (2):295 - 315.score: 84.0
    In this paper, illocutionary acts of commanding will be differentiated from perlocutionary acts that affect preferences of addressees in a new dynamic logic which combines the preference upgrade introduced in DEUL (dynamic epistemic upgrade logic) by van Benthem and Liu with the deontic update introduced in ECL II (eliminative command logic II) by Yamada. The resulting logic will incorporate J. L. Austin’s distinction between illocutionary acts as acts having mere conventional effects and perlocutionary acts as acts having real (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Maciej Witek (2010). Naturalising Illocutionary Rules. In Marcin Miłkowski & Konrad Talmont-Kaminski (eds.), Beyond Description: Naturalism and Normativity. College Publications.score: 84.0
    In this paper I consider the concept of an illocutionary rule - i.e., the rule of the form "X counts as 7 in context C" - and examine the role it plays in explaining the nature of verbal communication and the conventionality of natural languages. My aim is to find a middle ground between John R. Searle's view, according to which every conventional speech act has to be explained in terms of illocutionary rules that underlie its performance, and (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Maciej Witek (forthcoming). How to Establish Authority with Words: Imperative Utterances and Presupposition Accommodation. In Anna Brożek (ed.), Logic, Methodology and Philosophy of Science at Warsaw University, Warszawa 2013.score: 76.0
    The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it aims at providing an account of an indirect mechanism responsible for establishing one's power to issue biding directive acts; second, it is intended as a case for an externalist account of illocutionary interaction. The mechanism in question is akin to what David Lewis calls presupposition accommodation: a rule-governed process whereby the context of an utterance is adjusted to make the utterance acceptable; the main idea behind the proposed account is that (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Aaron Sloman (1969). Transformations of Illocutionary Acts. Analysis 30 (2):56 - 59.score: 76.0
    Speech-Act analyses of words like 'good', 'true', 'know' and 'probable' were criticised by j.R. Searle in "speech acts". I have tried to show how his criticisms can be met by an analysis in terms of operators on speech acts which 'transform' them into other speech-Acts. I conclude, Not that speech-Act analyses are correct, But that they survive searle's criticism.
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Friedrich Christoph Doerge (2006). Re-Definition and Alston's 'Illocutionary Acts'. Grazer Philosophische Studien 73 (1):97-111.score: 72.0
    The original definition of a technical term, the paper argues, should not be altered without a good reason. This notion is applied to the conception of illocutionary acts suggested by Alston, which markedly differs from the conception originally introduced by John L. Austin. Alston appears to agree with the argument; at least, he does attempt to justify his re-definition. The paper argues, however, that the reasons he gives fail.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Acts Alston’S.‘Illocutionary (2007). Re Definition and Alston's 'Illocutionary Acts'friedrich Christoph Doerge University of Tübingen. Grazer Philosophische Studien 73:97-111.score: 72.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Jacques Mœschler (1992). The Pragmatic Aspects of Linguistic Negation: Speech Act, Argumentation and Pragmatic Inference. [REVIEW] Argumentation 6 (1):51-76.score: 66.0
    This paper is an attempt to give a general explanation of pragmatic aspects of linguistic negation. After a brief survey of classical accounts of negation within pragmatic theories (as speech act theory, argumentation theory and polyphonic theory), the main pragmatic uses of negation (illocutionary negation, external negation, lowering and majoring negation) are discussed within relevance theory. The question of the relevance of negative utterance is raised, and a general inferential schema (based on the so-called invited inference) is proposed and (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. John R. Searle (1968). Austin on Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts. Philosophical Review 77 (4):405-424.score: 60.0
  21. Manuel Garcia-Carpintero (2007). Fiction-Making as a Gricean Illocutionary Type. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 65 (2):203–216.score: 60.0
    There are propositions constituting the content of fictions—sometimes of the utmost importance to understand them—which are not explicitly presented, but must somehow be inferred. This essay deals with what these inferences tell us about the nature of fiction. I will criticize three well-known proposals in the literature: those by David Lewis, Gregory Currie, and Kendall Walton. I advocate a proposal of my own, which I will claim improves on theirs. Most important for my purposes, I will argue on this basis, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Mari Mikkola (2011). Illocution, Silencing and the Act of Refusal. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 92 (3):415-437.score: 60.0
    Rae Langton and Jennifer Hornsby argue that there may be a free-speech argument against pornography, if pornographic speech has the power to illocutionarily silence women: women's locution ‘No!’ that aims to refuse unwanted sex may misfire because pornography creates communicative conditions where the locution does not count as a refusal. Central to this is the view that women's speech lacks uptake, which is necessary for illocutionary acts like that of refusal. Alexander Bird has critiqued this view by arguing that (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Maximilian De Gaynesford (2009). Illocutionary Acts, Subordination and Silencing. Analysis 69 (3):488-490.score: 60.0
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Stephen Barker (2002). Review: Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. [REVIEW] Mind 111 (443):633-639.score: 60.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. C. R. Carr (1978). Speaker Meaning and Illocutionary Acts. Philosophical Studies 34 (3):281 - 291.score: 60.0
  26. John T. Kearns (2006). Conditional Assertion, Denial, and Supposition as Illocutionary Acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (4):455 - 485.score: 60.0
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Bede Rundle (2001). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. International Philosophical Quarterly 41 (2):246-247.score: 60.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. David Simpson (1992). Communicative Skills in the Constitution of Illocutionary Acts. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (1):82 – 92.score: 60.0
  29. Mark Siebel (2001). William P. Alston: Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning, Cornell University Press: Ithaca and London 2000. Grazer Philosophische Studien 62 (1):249-261.score: 60.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Robert M. Harnish (2002). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning William P. Alston Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2000, Xiii + 327 Pp., $48.50. [REVIEW] Dialogue 41 (03):589-.score: 60.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Gregory Currie (1986). Works of Fiction and Illocutionary Acts. Philosophy and Literature 10 (2):304-308.score: 60.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. M. Simons (2002). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Philosophical Review 111 (1):152-155.score: 60.0
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Edward S. Shirley (1975). The Impossibility of a Speech Act Theory of Meaning. Philosophy and Rhetoric 8 (2):114 - 122.score: 60.0
    I argue that john r searle's speech-Act theory of meaning violates his own requirement that such a theory specify a set of conditions for the performance of a certain illocutionary (speech) act which does not include the performance of any other illocutionary act. For the "propositional act" mentioned in searle's analysans is in actuality an illocutionary act. Then I show that any speech-Act theory must include a subsidiary speech act in the analysans. Since the analysans must not (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Jeff Coulter (1983). Contingent and a Priori Structures in Sequential Analysis: Introduction: On the Combinatorial Logic for Illocutionary Acts. Human Studies 6 (4):361 - 376.score: 60.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Haig Khatchadourian (1974). Conditions of Illocutionary Acts. Philosophical Studies 26 (1):1 - 22.score: 60.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. F. B. A. Asiedu (2001). Illocutionary Acts and the Uncanny: On Nicholas Wolterstorff's Idea of Divine Discourse. Heythrop Journal 42 (3):283–310.score: 60.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Mary Sirridge (1987). Donkeys, Stars, and Illocutionary Acts. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 45 (4):381-388.score: 60.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Stewart Thau (1972). The Distinction Between Rhetic and Illocutionary Acts. Analysis 32 (6):177 - 183.score: 60.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. J. W. Roxbee Cox & Mats Furberg (1966). Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts: A Main Theme in J. L. Austin's Philosophy. Philosophical Quarterly 16 (62):80.score: 60.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. K. Mandoki (1999). Aesthetics and Pragmatics: Conversion, Constitution and the Dimensions of Illocutionary Acts: Conversion, Constitution and the Dimensions of Illocutionary Acts. Pragmatics and Cognition 7 (2):313-338.score: 60.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. William P. Alston (2002). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Dialogue 41 (3):589-590.score: 60.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. S. V. Bokil (2003). Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Indian Philosophical Quarterly 30 (2):347-355.score: 60.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Mats Furberg (1963). Locutionary and Illocutionary Acts. Almqvist & Wiksell.score: 60.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Maximilian De Gaynesford (2009). Illocutionary Acts, Subordination and Silencing. Analysis 69 (3):488 - 490.score: 60.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Katya Mandoki (1999). Aesthetics and Pragmatics: Conversion, Constitution and the Dimensions of Illocutionary Acts. Pragmatics and Cognition 7 (2):313-337.score: 60.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Masahide Yotsu (2012). On Illocutionary Acts: An Attempt at Analysis on the Basis of the Concepts of “Socially Regarded^|^quot; and “Ostensible Attitudes^|^Quot. Kagaku Tetsugaku 45 (1):35-46.score: 60.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Jerrold J. Katz (1977). Propositional Structure and Illocutionary Force: A Study of the Contribution of Sentence Meaning to Speech Acts. Harvester.score: 58.0
    Katz offers such a grammatical account, in which makes it possible for the first time to explain the illocutionary potential of sentences within grammar.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Maciej Witek (2015). An Interactional Account of Illocutionary Practice. Language Sciences 47:43-55.score: 58.0
    The paper aims to develop an interactional account of illocutionary practice, which results from integrating elements of Millikan's biological model of language within the framework of Austin's theory of speech acts. The proposed account rests on the assumption that the force of an act depends on what counts as its interactional effect or, in other words, on the response that it conventionally invites or attempts to elicit. The discussion is divided into two parts. The first one reconsiders Austin's and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Antonio Blanco Salgueiro (2008). Cómo Hacer Cosas Malas Con Palabras: Actos Ilocucionarios Hostiles y Los Fundamentos de la Teoría de Los Actos de Habla (How to Do Bad Things with Words: Hostile Speech Acts and the Foundations of Speech Act Theory). Critica 40 (118):3 - 27.score: 56.0
    En el presente artículo se defiende que el estudio de una familia particular de actos de habla, los actos ilocucionarios hostiles, nos da la clave para reexaminar cuatro importantes cuestiones fundacionales de la teoría de los actos de habla: la distinción ilocucionario/perlocucionario, la noción de infortunio, la cuestión de la primacía de la primera sobre la tercera persona en el estudio de la fuerza, y la cuestión de la posibilidad de una teoría general y sistemática del fenómeno de la fuerza. (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Ray S. Yeo (2014). Scripture's Practical Authority and the Response of Faith From a Speech‐Act Theoretic Perspective. Heythrop Journal 55 (6).score: 56.0
    This paper brings together the work of Nicholas Wolterstorff and William Alston in speech-act theory with the aim of providing a deeper understanding of the nature of divine speaking through the medium of Scripture. Despite the fecundity of Wolterstorff's seminal work on the philosophical theology of Scripture, aspects of his speech-act centric account are underdeveloped and would benefit from the contributions of William Alston. In particular, his account of divine speech-acts could be fruitfully expanded by incorporating the concept of ‘taking (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000