Search results for 'internal relations' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  23
    Michael Hymers (1996). Internal Relations and Analyticity: Wittgenstein and Quine. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):591 - 612.
    L'A. défend la thèse selon laquelle Wittgenstein développe une conception pragmatique et linguistique des relations internes qui définissent les vérités nécessaires: 1) qui n'implique pas l'analyticité de toutes les propositions exprimant des relations internes, 2) qui établit une distinction entre l'analytique et le synthétique, 3) qui s'avère compatible avec la critique de l'analyticité entreprise par Quine.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  2. Marie McGinn (2010). Wittgenstein and Internal Relations. European Journal of Philosophy 18 (4):495-509.
    Abstract: Interpretations of the Tractatus divide into what might be called a metaphysical and an anti-metaphysical approach to the work. The central issue between the two interpretative approaches has generally been characterised in terms of the question whether the Tractatus is committed to the idea of ‘things’ that cannot be said in language, and thus to the idea of a distinctive kind of nonsense: nonsense that is an attempt to say what can only be shown. In this paper, I look (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  54
    Andreas Blank (2007). Wittgenstein on Expectation, Action, and Internal Relations, 1930-1932. Inquiry 50 (3):270 – 287.
    According to Wittgenstein, internal relations are such that, once their terms are given, it is unthinkable that they do not hold. In his early philosophy, the concept of internal relation plays a central role in his views on meaning. The present paper addresses the question of how Wittgenstein's views about internal relations develop during his years of transition (1930-32). In particular, it investigates the connections between the concepts of internal relation, logical multiplicity, and aspect (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  4.  4
    A. R. Manser (1982). Bradley and Internal Relations. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 13:181-195.
    Bradley is often described as an Anglo-Hegelian, and hence it is assumed that his doctrines derive from Hegel. It is true that his first two works ‘The Presuppositions of Critical History’ and Ethical Studies are heavily influenced by Hegel. The Principles of Logic is much less so: it certainly contains a number of both laudatory and critical references to Hegel, but the whole design of the book is completely unrelated to his treatment of logic. Appearance and Reality seems to me (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  48
    Ian Underwood (2010). Cross-Count Identity, Distinctness, and the Theory of Internal and External Relations. Philosophical Studies 151 (2):265 - 283.
    Baxter (Australas J Philos 79: 449-464, 2001) proposes an ingenious solution to the problem of instantiation based on his theory of cross-count identity. His idea is that where a particular instantiates a universal it shares an aspect with that universal. Both the particular and the universal are numerically identical with the shared aspect in different counts. Although Baxter does not say exactly what a count is, it appears that he takes ways of counting as mysterious primitives against which different numerical (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  38
    Helge Malmgren (1975). Internal Relations in the Analysis of Consciousness. Theoria 41 (2):61-83.
  7. Martin Shuster (2010). Internal Relations and the Possibility of Evil: On Cavell and Monstrosity. European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy 2:74-84.
    In this article, I examine Cavell's understanding and deployment of the catego-ries of 'evil' and the 'monstrous' in The Claim of Reason. Arguing that these notions can-not be understood apart from Cavell's reliance on the notion of an 'internal relation,' I trace this notion to its Wittgensteinian roots. Ultimately, I show that Cavell's view of evil allows us to navigate between two horns of a classic dilemma in thinking about evil: it al-lows us to see evil as neither a (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  8.  73
    J. Michael Dunn (1990). Relevant Predication 2: Intrinsic Properties and Internal Relations. Philosophical Studies 60 (3):177-206.
  9. Mark H. Bickhard (2003). Some Notes on Internal and External Relations and Representation. Consciousness and Emotion 4 (1):101-110.
    Internal relations are those relations that are intrinsic to the nature of one or more of the relata. They are a kind of essential relation, rather than an essential property. For example, an arc of a circle is internally related to the center of that circle in the sense that.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  10. G. E. Moore (1919). External and Internal Relations. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 20:40 - 62.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  11.  29
    Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2010). Composed Objects, Internal Relations, and Purely Intentional Negativity. Ingarden's Theory of States of Affairs. Polish Journal of Philosophy 4 (2):63-80.
    Ingarden’s official ontology of states of affairs is by no means reductionist. According to him there are states of affairs, but they are ontologically dependent onother entities. There are certain classical arguments for the introduction of states of affairs as extra entities over and above the nominal objects, that can be labelled “the problem of composition,” “the problem of relation” and “the problem of negation.” To the first two Ingarden proposes rather traditional solutions, while his treatment of negation proves to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  39
    Ralph W. Church (1935). On Dr. Ewing's Neglect of Bradley's Theory of Internal Relations. Journal of Philosophy 32 (10):264-273.
  13.  28
    Brand Blanshard (1967). Internal Relations and Their Importance to Philosophy. Review of Metaphysics 21 (2):227 - 236.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  11
    Rupert Read (1997). The Career of" Internal Relations" in Wittgenstein's Work. Wittgenstein-Studien 4 (2).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15.  36
    A. C. Ewing (1935). On Dr. Ewing's Neglect of Bradley's Theory of Internal Relations: Reply. Journal of Philosophy 32 (10):273.
  16.  24
    Branwen Gruffydd Jones (2007). International Relations as Internal Relations. Review of After International Relations: Critical Realism and the (Re)Construction of World Politics by Heikki Patomäki. Journal of Critical Realism 1 (1):147-157.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  27
    David J. Crossley (1977). Holism, Individuation, and Internal Relations. Journal of the History of Philosophy 15 (2):183-194.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  10
    Robert A. Oakes (1971). Professor Blanshard, Causality, and Internal Relations. Idealistic Studies 1 (2):172-178.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  14
    Frederick L. Will (1940). Internal Relations and the Principle of Identity. Philosophical Review 49 (5):497-514.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. James Guetti & Rupert Read (1996). Acting From Rules: Internal Relations Versus Logical Existentialism. International Studies in Philosophy 28 (2):43-62.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  21.  13
    Louise N. Roberts (1976). Internal Relations and the Work of Art. Tulane Studies in Philosophy 25:71-78.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  15
    Bruce Aune (1967). Blanshard and Internal Relations. Review of Metaphysics 21 (2):237 - 243.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  5
    Barbara Muraca (2005). Welt, Umwelt, Mitwelt: Cultural, Natural, and Social World as Complex Intertwined Field of Internal Relations. Process Studies 34 (1):98-116.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  11
    Dennis A. Rohatyn (1974). Internal Relations. Philosophical Papers 3 (2):99-103.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  2
    B. Muraca (2005). Welt, Umwelt, Mitwelt: Cultural, Natural, and Social World as Complex Intertwined Field of Internal Relations: The Contribution of Process Thought to a General Theory of Sustainability. Process Studies 34 (1):98-116.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  10
    Alvin F. Nelson (1972). Internal Relations. Southwestern Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):23-31.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  11
    G. Ryle & A. J. Ayer (1935). Symposium: Internal Relations. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 14:154 - 185.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28.  9
    Alice Ambrose Lazerowitz (1967). Internal Relations. Review of Metaphysics 21 (2):256 - 261.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29.  10
    Philip P. Hanson (2004). Idealism, Scepticism, and Internal Relations: Remarks on Hymers's Philosophy and its Epistemic Neuroses. Dialogue 43 (3):577-586.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  3
    Josep Lluís Prades (2006). Varieties of Internal Relations: Intention, Expression and Norms. Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 25 (1):137-154.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  11
    Richard Hudelson (1984). Marx and the Theory of Internal Relations: A Critical Note on Ollman's Interpretation of Marx. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14 (4):505-507.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. G. Ryle & A. J. Ayer (1935). Internal Relations. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 14:154-185.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  33. A. Ambrose (1968). Internal Relations. Review of Metaphysics 21:256-261.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Aldo Gargani (1985). Internal Relations. Syntax and Use in Wittgenstein's Philosophical Analysis. Theoria 2:61-71.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Nicholas Griffin (2007). Bertrand Russell and Harold Joachim: The Paper is Partly Biographical and Partly Philosophical. It Traces Russell’s Philosophical Interactions with the British Neo-Hegelian Philosopher, Harold Joachim, From Russell’s Days as an Undergraduate in the 1890s to His Scathing Review of Joachim’s Inaugural Lecture as Wykeham Professor of Logic at Oxford in 1920. The Philosophical Part Attempts to Evaluate Russell’s Main Argument Against Joachim’s Coherence Theory of Truth, That It is Equivalent to the Doctrine of Internal Relations. The Paper Makes Use of Russell’s Recently Discovered Letters to Joachim. [REVIEW] Russell 27 (2).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Dennis A. Rohatyn (1975). Internal Relations. Philosophical Papers 4 (2):116-120.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37.  43
    Bo R. Meinertsen (2011). Distinguishing Internal, External and Grounded Relations. Grazer Philosophische Studien 83:113-22.
    I defend an ontological distinction between three kinds of relation: internal,external and grounded relations. Even though, as we shall see, this trichotomy is basic, it is not found in influential contemporary metaphysics. Specifically, the widespread tendency, exemplified notably by David Armstrong, of not recognizing grounded relations as distinct from external relations, can be shown to be mistaken. I propose a definition of each of the three kinds of relation. Of vital importance to the parsimony of metaphysics, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  64
    Arkadiusz Chrudzimski (2005). Internal, External and Intra-Individual Relations. Axiomathes 15 (4):487-512.
    In this paper I argue that there are in fact external relations in Russell’s sense. The level at which we are forced to acknowledge them is, however, not the level of relations between concrete individual objects. All relations of this kind, which I will call “inter-individual” relations, can be construed as supervenient on the monadic properties of their terms. But if we pursue our ontological analysis a little bit deeper and consider the internal structure of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  19
    Rodger Kibble (2007). Generating Coherence Relations Via Internal Argumentation. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (4):387-402.
    A key requirement for the automatic generation of argumentative or explanatory text is to present the constituent propositions in an order that readers will find coherent and natural, to increase the likelihood that they will understand and accept the author’s claims. Natural language generation systems have standardly employed a repertoire of coherence relations such as those defined by Mann and Thompson’s Rhetorical Structure Theory. This paper models the generation of persuasive monologue as the outcome of an “inner dialogue”, where (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  37
    Fraser MacBride (2016). Relations. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    In this paper I provide a state of the art survey and assessment of the contemporary debate about relations. After (1) distinguishing different varieties of relations, symmetric from non-symmetric, internal from external relations etc. and relations from their set-theoretic models or sequences, I proceed (2) to consider Bradley’s regress and whether relations can be eliminated altogether. Next I turn (3) to the question whether relations can be reduced, bringing to bear considerations from the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. David Yates (2016). Is Powerful Causation an Internal Relation? In Anna Marmodoro & David Yates (eds.), The Metaphysics of Relations. OUP 138-156.
    In this paper I consider whether a powers ontology facilitates a reduction of causal relations to intrinsic powers of the causal relata. I first argue that there is a tension in the view that powerful causation is an internal relation in this sense. Powers are ontologically dependent on other powers for their individuation, but in that case—given an Aristotelian conception of properties as immanent universals—powers will not be intrinsic on several extant analyses of ‘intrinsic’, since to possess a (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Richard Rorty (1967). Relations, Internal and External. In Paul Edwards (ed.), The Encyclopedia of Philosophy. New York, Macmillan 8--125.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43. Colin McGinn (1982). According to Fodor, Beliefs (and I Shall Take These as Exemplary) Involve Relations to Internal Representations: To Believe That P is to Be in a Certain Relation to Some Internal State s Which Represents. In Andrew Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object: Essays on Intentionality. Oxford: Clarendon Press 207.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  44.  69
    Daniel von Wachter (1998). On Doing Without Relations. Erkenntnis 48 (2/3):355-358.
    Internal relations are nothing over and above the terms of the relation.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  11
    Graham S. Clarke (2008). The Internal Conversation: A Personal Relations Theory Perspective. Journal of Critical Realism 7 (1):57-82.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  4
    Mary Hegarty (2004). Diagrams in the Mind and in the World: Relations Between Internal and External Visualizations. In A. Blackwell, K. Marriott & A. Shimojima (eds.), Diagrammatic Representation and Inference. Springer 1--13.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  47.  14
    H. M. (2003). Some Notes on Internal and External Relations and Representation. Consciousness and Emotion 4 (1):101-110.
  48. Hilan Bensusan & Manuel de Pinedo, Priority Monism, Physical Intentionality and the Internal Relatedness of All Things.
    Schaffer (2010) argues that the internal relatedness of all things, no matter how it is conceived, entails priority monism. He claims that a sufficiently pervasive internal relation among objects implies the priority of the whole, understood as a concrete object. This paper shows that at least in the case of an internal relatedness of all things conceived in terms of physical intentionality - one way to understand dispositions - priority monism not only doesn't follow but also is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  88
    Anna Marmodoro & David Yates (eds.) (2016). The Metaphysics of Relations. Oxford University Press Uk.
    Fifteen philosophers offer new essays exploring the metaphysics of relations from antiquity to the present day. They address topics as diverse as ancient and medieval reasons for scepticism about polyadic properties; recent attempts to reduce causal and spatiotemporal relations; recent work on the directionality of relational properties; powers ontologies and their associated problems; whether the most promising interpretations of quantum mechanics posit a fundamentally relational world; and whether the very idea of such a world is coherent. From those (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Fabrice Correia (2005). Existential Dependence and Cognate Notions. Philosophia Verlag.
    The purpose of the book is to clarify the notion of existential dependence and cognate notions, such as supervenience and the notion of an internal relation. I defend the view that such notions are best understood in terms of the concept of metaphysical grounding, i.e. the concept of one fact obtaining in virtue of other facts, where ‘in virtue of’ has a distinctively metaphysical meaning.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   38 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000