Results for 'knowing who'

999 found
Order:
  1.  4
    Knowing who occupies an office; purely contingent, necessary and impossible offices.Marie Duzi & Martina Číhalová - unknown
    This paper examines different kinds of definite descriptions denoting purely contingent, necessary or impossible objects. The discourse about contingent/impossible/necessary objects can be organised in terms of rational questions to ask and answer relative to the modal profile of the entity in question. There are also limits on what it is rational to know about entities with this or that modal profile. We will also examine epistemic modalities; they are the kind of necessity and possibility that is determined by epistemic constraints (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  2.  99
    Knowing Who.Steven Boër & William Lycan - 1986 - MIT Press.
    This is the first detailed study to explore the little-understood notions of "knowing who someone is," "knowing a person's identity," and related locutions. It locates these notions within the context of a general theory of believing and a semantical theory of belief- and knowledge-ascriptions.The books's main contention is that what one knows, when one knows who someone is, is not normally an identity in the numerical sense of "a = b," but rather a certain sort of predication to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   59 citations  
  3.  6
    Knowing Who you Are.William J. Devlin - 2019-10-03 - In Richard B. Davis (ed.), Disney and Philosophy. Wiley. pp. 107–117.
    Disney's computer‐animated musical film, Moana tells the tale of Moana, the daughter of Tui, the chief of a Polynesian island, Motunui. Bound by the legendary tradition of her ancestors, Moana is expected to follow her lineage and take over as chief when she grows up. As the authors dig beneath the surface level of the story, they find a metaphorical and philosophical level to Moana's journey. The story of Moana has layers. First, it is literally a tale of Moana's voyage (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  4.  14
    Knowing-Who in Quantified Epistemic Logic.Maria Aloni - 2018 - In Hans van Ditmarsch & Gabriel Sandu (eds.), Jaakko Hintikka on Knowledge and Game Theoretical Semantics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer. pp. 109-129.
    This article proposes an account of knowing-who constructions within a generalisation of Hintikka’s quantified epistemic logic employing the notion of a conceptual cover Aloni PhD thesis [1]. The proposed logical system captures the inherent context-sensitivity of knowing-wh constructions Boër and Lycan, as well as expresses non-trivial cases of so-called concealed questions Heim. Assuming that quantifying into epistemic contexts and knowing-who are linked in the way Hintikka had proposed, the context dependence of the latter will translate into a (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  5. Knowing who.Steven E. Boër & William G. Lycan - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 28 (5):299 - 344.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   78 citations  
  6.  16
    Knowing Who.Mark Richard - 1993 - Noûs 27 (2):235-243.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   29 citations  
  7.  31
    Knowing Who.Carol A. Rovane - 1989 - Philosophical Review 98 (3):392.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  8. Knowing Who.William G. Lycan - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):654-656.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   17 citations  
  9.  14
    Knowing Who.Scott Soames - 1988 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):657.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   15 citations  
  10.  22
    Knowing Who Your Friends Are: Aspects of the Politics of Logical Empiricism.Thomas Uebel - 2009 - Science & Education 18 (2):161-168.
  11.  51
    Knowing who to trust: exploring the role of 'ethical metadata' in mediating risk of harm in collaborative genomics research in Africa.Jantina de Vries, Thomas N. Williams, Kalifa Bojang, Dominic P. Kwiatkowski, Raymond Fitzpatrick & Michael Parker - 2014 - BMC Medical Ethics 15 (1):62.
    The practice of making datasets publicly available for use by the wider scientific community has become firmly integrated in genomic science. One significant gap in literature around data sharing concerns how it impacts on scientists’ ability to preserve values and ethical standards that form an essential component of scientific collaborations. We conducted a qualitative sociological study examining the potential for harm to ethnic groups, and implications of such ethical concerns for data sharing. We focused our empirical work on the MalariaGEN (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   5 citations  
  12.  66
    "I Know Who I Am": Don Quixote, Self-Fashioning, and the Humanness of Ordinary Identity.Martinez Felicia - 2016 - Philosophy and Literature 40 (2):511-525.
    What does it mean to know who you are? Is it a matter of knowing your name? The things that you’ve done? The people you love? Such indispensible knowledge is somehow not enough; I can know all of these things, and still feel puzzled about who I am. “I am not the person I once was,” “I am not myself today,” and “I am learning who I am,” are all commonplace poems of a kind: expressive sentences completely at home (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  13.  39
    Knowing Who Knows: Laypersons' Capabilities to Judge Experts' Pertinence for Science Topics.Rainer Bromme & Eva Thomm - 2016 - Cognitive Science 40 (1):241-252.
    Because modern societies are built on elaborate divisions of cognitive labor, individuals remain laypersons in most knowledge domains. Hence, they have to rely on others' expertise when deciding on many science-related issues in private and public life. Even children already locate and discern expertise in the minds of others. This study examines how far university students accurately judge experts' pertinence for science topics even when they lack proficient knowledge of the domain. Participants judged the pertinence of experts from diverse disciplines (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  14.  96
    On Knowing Who I Am.John Perry - 2023 - Belgrade Philosophical Annual 36 (1):25-32.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  15. Knowing Who.William G. Lycan & Steven E. Boër - 1987 - Mind 96 (382):278-280.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   3 citations  
  16.  39
    Knowing Who by Stephen E. Boer, William G. Lycan.Kim Sterelny - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):654-656.
  17.  17
    Knowing who to trust: women and public health.Cressida Auckland - 2022 - Journal of Medical Ethics 48 (8):501-503.
    In this issue of the JME, age-old questions around how to balance the interests of mother and fetus are revisited in two separate contexts: alcohol consumption during pregnancy, and maternal request caesarean sections. Both have been the subject of recent controversy in the UK, with March 2022 seeing the introduction of new National Institute for Clinical Excellence Quality Standards on combatting foetal alcohol spectrum disorder 1; and the publication of the long-awaited Ockenden Review into a series of failures in NHS (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  18. Now you know who Hong oak yun is.David Braun - 2006 - Philosophical Issues 16 (1):24-42.
    Hong Oak Yun is a person who is over three inches tall. And now you know who Hong Oak Yun is. For if someone were to ask you ‘Who is Hong Oak Yun?’, you could answer that Hong Oak Yun is a person who is over three inches tall, and you would know what you were saying. So you know an answer to the question ‘Who is Hong Oak Yun?’, and that is sufficient for knowing who Hong Oak Yun (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   33 citations  
  19.  74
    Knowing Who: How Perspectives and Contexts Interact.Maria Aloni & Bruno Jacinto - 2014 - In Franck Lihoreau & Manuel Rebuschi (eds.), Epistemology, Context, and Formalism. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  20.  21
    Knowing who you want to be when you grow up: Implications for pediatric assent.Richard R. Sharp & Rosemary B. Quigley - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (4):14 – 15.
  21.  4
    On Knowing Who One Is.Sydney Shoemaker - 1966 - Common Factor 4:49-56.
  22.  25
    On Not Knowing Who We Are: The Ethical Importance of Transcendent Anthropology.Bojan Žalec - 2011 - Synthesis Philosophica 26 (1):105-115.
    The article is dealing with the ethical importance of the acceptance of the transcendence of every person. The author argues in favor of the following thesis: Transcendent anthropology is a positive factor of personalism; Violation of solidarity is fundamental evil; Apophatic anthropology is a realistic view; We should avoid the extreme positions regarding identities: nihilist or neutralist at one hand and non-critical acceptance and their ossification at the other. The proper approach to identities is critical realism and dialogic universalism; The (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  23.  42
    How do we know who we are?: a biography of the self.Arnold M. Ludwig - 1997 - New York: Oxford University Press.
    "The terrain of the self is vast," notes renowned psychiatrist Arnold Ludwig, "parts known, parts impenetrable, and parts unexplored." How do we construct a sense of ourselves? How can a self reflect upon itself or deceive itself? Is all personal identity plagiarized? Is a "true" or "authentic" self even possible? Is it possible to really "know" someone else or ourselves for that matter? To answer these and many other intriguing questions, Ludwig takes a unique approach, examining the art of biography (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  24.  7
    A Radical Afterthought: We Know Who the Students Are, but Who Will Be the Teachers?Alexander Riegler - 2023 - Constructivist Foundations 18 (2):348-350.
    I ponder what the rapid progress of AI means for education in the 21st century. Is it feasible to expect embodied autonomous tools that, through participatory sense-making, can construct knowledge ready to be taught to students?
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  25.  12
    Do you know who you are?: reading the Buddha's discourses.Krishnan Venkatesh - 2018 - Macon, Georgia: Mercer University Press.
    A unique study of the earliest recorded "discourses" of the Buddha, taking an approach that is at once psychological, philosophical, and literary. The book is a series of essays on specific passages from the Buddha's original Discourses and is an introduction to the Buddha's radical empiricism for all people who like to read, think, and investigate.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  26. Belief De Re, Knowing Who, and Singular Thought.Michaelis Michael - 2010 - Journal of Philosophy 107 (6):293-310.
  27.  63
    “We Won't Know Who You Are”: Contesting Sex Designations in New York City Birth Certificates.Paisley Currah & Lisa Jean Moore - 2008 - Hypatia 24 (3):113-135.
    This article examines shifts in the legal, medical, and common-sense logics governing the designation of sex on birth certificates issued by the City of New York between 1965 and 2006. In the initial iteration, the stabilization of legal sex categories was organized around the notion of “fraud”; in the most recent iteration, “permanence” became the measure of authenticity. We frame these legal constructions of sex with theories about the “natural attitude” toward gender.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   2 citations  
  28.  21
    How do we know who we are?Janet Carsten - 2007 - In Rita Astuti, Jonathan P. Parry & Charles Stafford (eds.), Questions of Anthropology. Berg. pp. 76--29.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  29.  18
    “Do You Know Who You Are?” Radical Existential Doubt and Scientific Certainty in the Search for the Kidnapped Children of the Disappeared in Argentina.Ari Gandsman - 2009 - Ethos: Journal of the Society for Psychological Anthropology 37 (4):441-465.
  30. Do you Know who your Experts are?Michael Idinopulos & Lee Kempler - 2006 - In Laurence Prusak & Eric Matson (eds.), Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning: A Reader. Oxford University Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  31.  4
    How do we know who may replace each other in triadic conflict roles?Lotte Thomsen - 2022 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 45.
    Group representations need not reduce to triadic conflict roles, although we infer group membership from them. A conceptual primitive of as one solidary, bounded unity or clique may motivate and facilitate reasoning about cooperative group interactions in context with and without intergroup conflict and may also be necessary for representing which agents would replace one another in a triadic conflict.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  32.  37
    Does anyone know who baptised G. K. Chesterton?Bernadette Sheridan - 1990 - The Chesterton Review 16 (3/4):292-294.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  33.  73
    More Radical Hermeneutics: On Not Knowing Who We Are.John D. Caputo - 2000 - Indiana University Press.
    In these spirited essays, John D. Caputo continues the project he launched with Radical Hermeneutics of making hermeneutics and deconstruction work together.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   18 citations  
  34.  23
    The book; on the taboo against knowing who you are.Alan Watts - 1966 - New York,: Vintage Books.
    Drawing upon ancient Hindu philosophy, the author explores the human psyche and the importance of personal identity.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   13 citations  
  35.  41
    Book Review:Knowing Who Stephen E. Boer, William G. Lycan. [REVIEW]Kim Sterelny - 1988 - Philosophy of Science 55 (4):654-.
  36.  29
    A Tale of Two Owens: Xiao 孝 as Trusting Others to Know Who You Are.Sai Ying Ng - forthcoming - Philosophy East and West.
    This paper offers an account of xiao 孝, often translated as filial piety or familial deference, which is compatible with Bernard Williams’s insistence that ethical deliberation should be indeterminate and open-ended, rather than pre-established on the basis of one’s social relationships. Through a critical reading of Williams’s account of ethical knowledge localized to an advisor model, I suggest that we trust those who share similar experiences in social relationships to offer advice specific to our social roles. This trust exhibits itself (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  37.  3
    Chapter 4. J. R. Jones: 'How do I know who I am?' the passage from objects to grammar.Walford Gealy - 2009 - In John T. Edelman (ed.), Sense and reality: essays out of Swansea. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag. pp. 69-102.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  38. Do we need to know how we know who.Be Fleming - 1987 - Semiotica 66 (4):423-429.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  39. Stephen E. Boër and William G. Lycan, Knowing Who Reviewed by.Robert M. Martin - 1987 - Philosophy in Review 7 (1):3-5.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  40.  42
    The Inaugural Address: How Do I Know Who I Am?J. R. Jones - 1967 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 41 (1):1 - 18.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  41.  1
    The Inaugural Address: How do I Know who I am?J. R. Jones - 1967 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 41 (1):1-18.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  42.  10
    Meet the philosophers of ancient Greece: everything you always wanted to know about Ancient Greek philosophy but didn't know who to ask.Patricia F. O'Grady (ed.) - 2005 - Ashgate.
    An accessible guide to philosophy, presenting a collection of 70 essays covering the major themes, theories and arguments of the most prominent thinkers of ancient Greece.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  43. Belonging: everything you always wanted to know about existentialism but didn't know who to ask.John P. Hollis - 1989 - Boerne, TX (P.O. Box 841, Boerne 78006): Corp. for Essentialist Philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  44.  10
    Who Knows Anything about Anything about AI?Stuart Armstrong & Seán ÓhÉigeartaigh - 2014-08-11 - In Russell Blackford & Damien Broderick (eds.), Intelligence Unbound. Wiley. pp. 46–60.
    This chapter provides a classification scheme for artificial intelligence (AI) predictions, and tools for analyzing their reliability and uncertainties. It presents a series of brief case studies of some of the most famous AI predictions: the initial Dartmouth AI conference; Hubert Dreyfus' criticism of AI; Ray Kurzweil's predictions in The Age of Spiritual Machines; and Stephen Omohundro's AI Drives. The chapter takes every falsifiable statement about future AI to be a prediction. Thus the following four categories are all predictions: Timelines (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  45. Who knows: from Quine to a feminist empiricism.Lynn Hankinson Nelson - 1990 - Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
    INTRODUCTION Reopening a Discussion The empiricist-derived epistemology that has directed most social and natural scientific inquiry for the last three ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   119 citations  
  46. Boer, S. E. and Lycan, W. G., "Knowing Who". [REVIEW]G. Mcculloch - 1987 - Mind 96:278.
  47.  1
    Ruthless: knowing the God who fights for you.Bo Stern - 2014 - Colorado Springs: NavPress.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark  
  48. Who Knows: From Quine to a Feminist Empiricism.Lynn Hankinson Nelson - 1992 - Hypatia 7 (1):100-114.
    I argue that Nelson's feminist transformation of empiricism provides the basis of a dialogue across three currently competing feminist epistemologies: feminist empiricism, feminist standpoint theories, and postmodern feminism, a dialogue that will result in a dissolution of the apparent tensions between these epistemologies and provide an epistemology with the openness and fluidity needed to embrace the concerns of feminists.
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   112 citations  
  49.  23
    Women Who Know Ritual.Hwa Yeong Wang - 2022 - Journal of Chinese Philosophy 49 (2):113-124.
    Too often Confucian women’s voices and experiences are neglected as insignificant. This paper provides a wide and diverse set of examples of traditional Chinese and Korean women who knew and practiced Confucian ritual. Though representing only a small percentage of traditional women, these examples provide clear evidence and compelling arguments that support the following three conclusions. First, that the Confucian tradition did not deny women’s ability to know and perform rituals; second, that Confucian women read, learned, evaluated, decided, and contributed (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    Bookmark   1 citation  
  50.  31
    Comment peut-on être un Américain continental? ** _Portraits of American Continental Philosophers. Edited by James R. Watson_** _American Continental Philosophy. A Reader. Edited by Walter Brogan and James Risser_** _God, the Gift, and Postmodernism. Edited by John D. Caputo and Michael J. Scanlon_** _John D. Caputo, The Prayers and Tears of Jacques Derrida. Religion without Religion_** _John D. Caputo, More Radical Hermeneutics. On not Knowing Who We Are_** Richard Rorty, Truth and Progress. [REVIEW]André Berten - 2001 - Revue Philosophique De Louvain 99 (2):291-297.
1 — 50 / 999