You are accessing PhilPapers from Open University (UK), an institution that is not subscribed to PhilPapers. Starting on July 1, 2014, we ask institutions that grant philosophy degrees and are based in high-GDP countries to contribute to PhilPapers' maintenance and development through a subscription. See this page for details. Please show your support by contacting your librarian.

Search results for 'knowledge of action' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Thor Grünbaum (2011). Perception and Non-Inferential Knowledge of Action. Philosophical Explorations 14 (2):153 - 167.score: 537.0
    I present an account of how agents can know what they are doing when they intentionally execute object-oriented actions. When an agent executes an object-oriented intentional action, she uses perception in such a way that it can fulfil a justificatory role for her knowledge of her own action and it can fulfil this justificatory role without being inferentially linked to the cognitive states that it justifies. I argue for this proposal by meeting two challenges: in an agent's (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Ladislav Tondl (2007). Rational Actions and the Integration of Knowledge. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (1):91 - 110.score: 405.0
    The paper emphasizes the role of knowledge dimensions of an action which could be regarded as rational. Rational action usually results of specific decision — making process including selection, evaluation and acceptance of a preferred alternative. This process should integrate not only various types of knowledge but also the interdisciplinary or interdepartmental knowledge integration. The integration of knowledge may cover various forms, especially integration of knowledge relating to different domains, of different quality, of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. John Schwenkler (2012). Non-Observational Knowledge of Action. Philosophy Compass 7 (10):731-740.score: 400.0
    Intuitively, the knowledge of one’s own intentional actions is different from the knowledge of actions of other sorts, including those of other people and unintentional actions of one's own. But how are we to understand this phenomenon? Does it pertain to all actions, under every description under which they are known? If so, then how is this possible? If not, then how should we think about cases that are exceptions to this principle? This paper is a critical survey (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jonathan Weisberg (2013). Knowledge in Action. Philosophers' Imprint 13 (22).score: 375.0
    Recent proposals that frame norms of action in terms of knowledge have been challenged by Bayesian decision theorists. Bayesians object that knowledge-based norms conflict with the highly successful and established view that rational action is rooted in degrees of belief. I argue that the knowledge-based and Bayesian pictures are not as incompatible as these objectors have made out. Attending to the mechanisms of practical reasoning exposes space for both knowledge and degrees of belief to (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Brian Ball (forthcoming). The Knowledge Rule and the Action Rule. Southern Journal of Philosophy.score: 372.0
    In this paper I compare Timothy Williamson’s knowledge rule of assertion with Ishani Maitra and Brian Weatherson’s action rule. The paper is in two parts. In the first part I present and respond to Maitra and Weatherson’s master argument against the knowledge rule. I argue that while its second premise, to the effect that an action X can be the thing to do though one is in no position to know that it is, is true, its (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Biswatosh Saha & Ram Kumar Kakani (2007). Knowledge, Power and Action: Towards an Understanding of Implementation Failures in a Government Scheme. [REVIEW] AI and Society 21 (1-2):72-92.score: 362.0
    Conceptual knowledge inspires imagination. On the other hand, it is a claim to power as well. Multiple knowledge claims often, therefore, are engaged in a contest. This contest can take the form of several discourses. Extant power structures play a significant role in lending (or not lending) a voice to one or several such discourses. To one with the power to govern, knowledge claims flowing from abstract concepts generated in an elite discourse not only inspires imagination but (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Matthew Chrisman (2012). The Normative Evaluation of Belief and the Aspectual Classification of Belief and Knowledge Attributions'. Journal of Philosophy 109 (10):588–612.score: 360.0
    It is a piece of philosophical commonsense that belief and knowledge are states. Some epistemologists reject this claim in hope of answering certain difficult questions about the normative evaluation of belief. I shall argue, however, that this move offends not only against philosophical commonsense but also against ordinary common sense, at least as far as this is manifested in the semantic content of the words we use to talk about belief and knowledge. I think it is relatively easily (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Elia Zardini (2013). Knowledge-How, True Indexical Belief, and Action. Philosophical Studies 164 (2):341-355.score: 357.0
    Intellectualism is the doctrine that knowing how to do something consists in knowing that something is the case. Drawing on contemporary linguistic theories of indirect questions, Jason Stanley and Timothy Williamson have recently revived intellectualism, proposing to interpret a sentence of the form ‘s knows how to F’ as ascribing to s knowledge of a certain way w of Fing that she can F in w. In order to preserve knowledgehow’s connection to action and thus avoid an overgeneration (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Xiaomei Yang (2009). How to Make Sense of the Claim “True Knowledge is What Constitutes Action”: A New Interpretation of Wang Yangming's Doctrine of Unity of Knowledge and Action. Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 8 (2):173-188.score: 357.0
    No one denies the importance of applying knowledge to actions. But claiming identity (unity) of knowledge and action is quite another thing. There seem to be two problems with the claim: (1) the identity claim implies that the sole cause for one to fail to act on what one judges to be right is ignorance, but it is obviously false that the sole cause of failure in moral actions is ignorance. (2) The identity statement implies non-separation of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Igal Kvart, Rational Assertibility, the Steering Role of Knowledge, and Pragmatic Encroachment.score: 351.0
    Igal Kvart RATIONAL ASSERTIBILITY, THE STEERING ROLE OF KNOWLEDGE, AND PRAGMATIC ENCROACHMENT Abstract In the past couple of decades, there were a few major attempts to establish the thesis of pragmatic encroachment – that there is a significant pragmatic ingredient in the truth-conditions for knowledge-ascriptions. Epistemic contextualism has flaunted the notion of a conversational standard, and Stanley's subject-sensitive invariantism (SSI) promoted stakes, each of which, according to their proponents, play a major role as pragmatic components in the truth (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jérôme Dokic & Joëlle Proust (eds.) (2002). Simulation and Knowledge of Action. John Benjamins.score: 351.0
    CHAPTER Simulation theory and mental concepts Alvin I. Goldman Rutgers University. Folk psychology and the TT-ST debate The study of folk psychology, ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Nicolas Georgieff & Yves Rossetti (1999). How Does Implicit and Explicit Knowledge Fit in the Consciousness of Action? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):765-766.score: 348.0
    Dienes & Perner's (D&P's) target articles proposes an analysis of explicit knowledge based on a progressive transformation of implicit into explicit products, applying this gradient to different aspects of knowledge that can be represented. The goal is to integrate a philosophical concept of knowledge with relevant psychophysical and neuropsychological data. D&P seem to fill an impressive portion of the gap between these two areas. We focus on two examples where a full synthesis of theoretical and empirical data (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Dr Eugenie Georgaca (2000). Participation, Knowledge and Power in 'New' Forms of Action Research. Outlines. Critical Practice Studies 2 (1):43-59.score: 348.0
    The paper uses the Offenders' Social Reintegration Project, run between 1988 and 1998 by the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece, to discuss the characteristics of new forms of action research and to reflect on the main debates within action research literature. Firstly, new forms of action research dealing with community issues tend to take place within complex systems, aiming to bring potential partners together and to facilitate the development of networks of organisations. Networking presupposes a more open-ended (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. James R. Beebe & Mark Jensen (2012). Surprising Connections Between Knowledge and Action: The Robustness of the Epistemic Side-Effect Effect. Philosophical Psychology 25 (5):689 - 715.score: 344.0
    A number of researchers have begun to demonstrate that the widely discussed ?Knobe effect? (wherein participants are more likely to think that actions with bad side-effects are brought about intentionally than actions with good or neutral side-effects) can be found in theory of mind judgments that do not involve the concept of intentional action. In this article we report experimental results that show that attributions of knowledge can be influenced by the kinds of (non-epistemic) concerns that drive the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. R. I. Ingalalli (1992). Knowledge of Action: Logico-Epistemological Analysis. Sri Satguru Publications.score: 342.0
  16. Hanna Pickard (2004). Knowledge of Action Without Observation. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (3):203–228.score: 336.0
    This paper argues that perception of one's body ‘from the inside’ provides one with an awareness of acting, and that this awareness explains a previously overlooked feature of one's knowledge of one's own actions. Actions are events: they occur during periods of time. Knowledge of such events must be sensitive to their course through time. Perception of one's body ‘from the inside’ allows one to monitor one's actions as they unfold, thereby sustaining one's knowledge of what one (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Cheng-Hung Tsai (forthcoming). Knowledge of Language in Action. Philosophical Explorations:1-22.score: 336.0
    Knowledge of a language is a kind of knowledge, the possession of which enables a speaker to understand and perform a variety of linguistic actions in that language. In this paper, I pursue an agency-oriented approach to knowledge of language. I begin by examining two major agency-oriented models of knowledge of language: Michael Dummett's Implicit Knowledge Model and Jennifer Hornsby's Practical Knowledge Model. I argue that each of these models is inadequate for different reasons. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. John Dewey (1929/1960). The Quest for Certainty: A Study of the Relation of Knowledge and Action. New York, Putnam.score: 333.0
    John Dewey's Gifford Lectures, given at Edinburgh in 1929.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Steven Gross, Knowledge of Meaning, Conscious and Unconscious. Meaning, Understanding and Knowledge (Vol 5: The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication).score: 327.0
    This paper motivates two bases for ascribing propositional semantic knowledge (or something knowledgelike): first, because it’s necessary to rationalize linguistic action; and, second, because it’s part of an empirical theory that would explain various aspects of linguistic behavior. The semantic knowledge ascribed on these two bases seems to differ in content, epistemic status, and cognitive role. This raises the question: how are they related, if at all? The bulk of the paper addresses this question. It distinguishes a (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. John Law (ed.) (1986). Power, Action, and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? Routledge & Kegan Paul.score: 315.0
  21. Junjun Liu (2005). Zhi Shi Yu She Hui Xing Dong de Jie Gou: Zhi Shi She Hui de Li Lun Yu Shi Jian Yan Jiu = Knowledge and the Structure of Social Action: Theoretical and Practical Aspects of Knowledge Society. Tianjin Ren Min Chu Ban She.score: 315.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Thor Grunbaum (2009). Anscombe and Practical Knowledge of What Is Happening. Grazer Philosophische Studien 78 (1):41-67.score: 306.0
  23. Samira Guennif (2002). From Knowledge to Individual Action. Confidence, the Hidden Face of Uncertainty. A Rereading of the Works of Knight and Keynes. Mind and Society 3 (2):13-28.score: 297.0
    The works of Knight (1921) and Keynes (1921, 1936) seek to clarify confusion about uncertainty. According to these authors, a precise analysis of uncertainty is required, in order to obtain a clear significance of the concept and understand the consequences for the decision process. Consequently, Knight and Keynes study the content of the decision process in uncertainty and converge towards similar views on the mobilization of confidence. Their works thus go beyond a simple examination of uncertainty, by also throwing light (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Vinayak Chaturvedi (2010). Rethinking Knowledge with Action: V. D. Savarkar, the Bhagavad Gita, and Histories of Warfare. Modern Intellectual History 7 (2):417-435.score: 297.0
    This essay examines the significance of the Bhagavad Gita for V. D. Savarkar's interpretations of religion, nationalism, and the idea of Hindu India. As one of the intellectual founders of Hindu nationalism, Savarkar has emerged as the most controversial Indian political thinker of the last century, gaining notoriety for his program to , for his anti-Muslim and anti-Christian politics, and for his advocacy of violence in everyday life. By bringing together key selections from Savarkar's seminal historical writings, the essay also (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Warren G. Frisina (2002). The Unity of Knowledge and Action: Toward a Nonrepresentational Theory of Knowledge. State University of New York Press.score: 297.0
    Uses the thought of Wang Yang-ming, John Dewey, and Alfred North Whitehead to explain a more coherent theory of knowledge.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. John Hawthorne & Jason Stanley (2008). Knowledge and Action. Journal of Philosophy 105 (10):571-590.score: 294.0
    Judging by our folk appraisals, then, knowledge and action are intimately related. The theories of rational action with which we are familiar leave this unexplained. Moreover, discussions of knowledge are frequently silent about this connection. This is a shame, since if there is such a connection it would seem to constitute one of the most fundamental roles for knowledge. Our purpose in this paper is to rectify this lacuna, by exploring ways in which knowing something (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Ishani Maitra & Brian Weatherson (2010). Assertion, Knowledge, and Action. Philosophical Studies 149 (1):99 - 118.score: 291.0
    We argue against the knowledge rule of assertion, and in favour of integrating the account of assertion more tightly with our best theories of evidence and action. We think that the knowledge rule has an incredible consequence when it comes to practical deliberation, that it can be right for a person to do something that she can't properly assert she can do. We develop some vignettes that show how this is possible, and how odd this consequence is. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Daniele Moyal-Sharrock (2000). Words as Deeds: Wittgenstein's ''Spontaneous Utterances'' and the Dissolution of the Explanatory Gap. Philosophical Psychology 13 (3):355 – 372.score: 282.0
    Wittgenstein demystified the notion of 'observational self-knowledge'. He dislodged the long-standing conception that we have privileged access to our impressions, sensations and feelings through introspection, and more precisely eliminated knowing as the kind of awareness that normally characterizes our first-person present-tense psychological statements. He was not thereby questioning our awareness of our emotions or sensations, but debunking the notion that we come to that awareness via any epistemic route. This makes the spontaneous linguistic articulation of our sensations and impressions (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Hans Chr Garmann Johnsen, James Karlsen, Roger Normann & Jens Kristian Fosse (2009). The Contradictory Nature of Knowledge: A Challenge for Understanding Innovation in a Local Context and Workplace Development and for Doing Action Research. [REVIEW] AI and Society 23 (1):85-98.score: 279.0
    The argument in this article is that knowledge is an important phenomenon to understand in order to discuss development and innovation in modern workplaces. Predominant theories on knowledge in organisation and innovation literature, we argue, are based on a dualist concept of knowledge. The arguments found in these theories argue for one type of knowledge in contrast to another. The most prevailing dualism is that between local and universal knowledge. We believe that arguing along this (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. John Bengson & Marc A. Moffett (2011). Two Conceptions of Mind and Action: Knowledge How and the Philosophical Theory of Intelligence. In John Bengson & Marc Moffett (eds.), Knowing How: Essays on Knowledge, Mind, and Action. Oxford University Press. 3.score: 279.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Arthur B. Markman, C. Miguel Brendl & Kyungil Kim (2009). From Goal-Activation to Action: How Does Preference and Use of Knowledge Intervene? In Ezequiel Morsella, John A. Bargh & Peter M. Gollwitzer (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Human Action. Oxford University Press.score: 279.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. David-Hillel Ruben (2008). Disjunctive Theories of Perception and Action. In Adrian Haddock & Fiona Macpherson (eds.), Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge. Oxford University Press. 227--243.score: 270.0
    A comparison of disjunctive theories of action and perception. The development of a theory of action that warrants the name, a disjunctive theory. On this theory, there is an exclusive disjunction: either an action or an event (in one sense). It follows that in that sense basic actions do not have events intrinsic to them.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Duncan Pritchard (2010). The Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations. Oxford University Press.score: 270.0
    The value problem -- Unpacking the value problem -- The swamping problem -- fundamental and non-fundamental epistemic goods -- The relevance of epistemic value monism -- Responding to the swamping problem I : the practical response -- Responding to the swamping problem II : the monistic response -- Responding to the swamping problem III : the pluralist response -- Robust virtue epistemology -- Knowledge and achievement -- Interlude : is robust virtue epistemology a reductive theory of knowledge? -- (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Steven Davis (ed.) (1983). Causal Theories Of Mind: Action, Knowledge, Memory, Perception, And Reference. Ny: De Gruyter.score: 270.0
    INTRODUCTION SECTION I In the last 20 years or so philosophers in the analytic tradition have taken an increasing interest in causal theories of a wide ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. T. Ramayah, Jasmine A. L. Yeap & Joshua Ignatius (2013). An Empirical Inquiry on Knowledge Sharing Among Academicians in Higher Learning Institutions. Minerva 51 (2):131-154.score: 270.0
    Universities are expected to be places where knowledge is shared freely among academicians. However, the reality shows that knowledge sharing is barely present within universities these days. As Malaysia shifts towards building a knowledge-based society, academic institutions, particularly the public universities, now face ever-growing faculty demands for sharing quality resources and expertise. As a result, knowledge sharing in academia has become a rising concern. The purpose of this study, then, is to uncover the factors that propel (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. John Allen Tucker (1985). A.S. Cua, The Unity of Knowledge and Action: A Study of Wang Yang-Ming's Moral Psychology, University Press of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1982 (12.95, 133pp.). [REVIEW] Journal of Chinese Philosophy 12 (1):97-100.score: 270.0
  37. Ton Baars (2011). Experiential Science; Towards an Integration of Implicit and Reflected Practitioner-Expert Knowledge in the Scientific Development of Organic Farming. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 24 (6):601-628.score: 270.0
    For further development of organic agriculture, it will become increasingly essential to integrate experienced innovative practitioners in research projects. The characteristics of this process of co-learning have been transformed into a research approach, theoretically conceptualized as “experiential science” (Baars 2007 , Baars and Baars 2007 ). The approach integrates social sciences, natural sciences, and human sciences. It is derived from action research and belongs to the wider field of transdiscliplinary research. In a dialogue-based culture of equality and mutual exchange (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Peter Brödner (2013). Reflective Design of Technology for Human Needs. AI and Society 28 (1):27-37.score: 270.0
    Inspired by an economic interpretation of the Faustus drama allegorically disclosing the ‘alchemical’ nature of modern economy, the paper presents a critical view on the development of technology as concomitant phenomenon of work practices with particular focus on manufacturing. It starts with a theoretical perspective on the dynamics of creating explicit propositional knowledge and its re-appropriation for practical use. This lays the ground for understanding how technical artefacts emerge from and, in turn, affect social practices. It further helps to (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Robert C. Neville (1983). The Unity of Knowledge and Action. Review of Metaphysics 36 (3):703-706.score: 270.0
  40. Guido Gainotti, Pietro Spinelli, Eugenia Scaricamazza & Camillo Marra (2013). The Evaluation of Sources of Knowledge Underlying Different Conceptual Categories. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7.score: 270.0
  41. Mark Johnson (2007). Review of "Realising Systems Thinking: Knowledge and Action in Management Science". By John Mingers. New York: Springer, 2006. [REVIEW] Journal of Critical Realism 6 (2):312-315.score: 270.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. William J. Rapaport (1988). Review: Leora Morgenstern, A First Order Theory of Planning, Knowledge, and Action. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 53 (2):664-665.score: 270.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. William Child (2002). Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.score: 270.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Burkart Holzner (1991). Knowledge and Action in the Emerging World: Social Science, the Shocks of Global Structural Change, and Policy. Knowledge and Policy 4 (1-2):18-36.score: 270.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Peter Janich (1988). Truth as Success of Action. The Constructive Approach in the Philosophy of Science in Scientific Knowledge Socialized. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 108:313-326.score: 270.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Inderjeet Parmar (2002). `To Relate Knowledge and Action': The Impact of the Rockefeller Foundation on Foreign Policy Thinking During America's Rise to Globalism 1939–1945. [REVIEW] Minerva 40 (3):235-263.score: 270.0
    The Rockefeller Foundation played a key role inthe shift from `isolationism' to globalism inUS foreign policy between 1939 and 1945. TheFoundation utilised its considerable financialresources in a conscious and systematic attemptto assist official policymakers and academicsto build a new globalist consensus within thestate and public opinion. The article testsfour theoretical models that have been used todescribe Rockefeller initiatives. It concludesthat a Gramscian analysis provides the mosthelpful way of understanding the Foundation'srole in American foreign affairs.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Donald M. Peterson (2002). Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.score: 270.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. François Recanati (2002). Simulation and Knowledge of Action. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.score: 270.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. William R. Stoeger (2009). Describing God's Action in the World in Light of Scientific Knowledge of Reality. In F. LeRon Shults, Nancey C. Murphy & Robert J. Russell (eds.), Philosophy, Science and Divine Action. Brill.score: 270.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Zdravko Radman (ed.) (2012). Knowing Without Thinking: Mind, Action, Cognition and the Phenomenon of the Background. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 267.0
    Machine generated contents note: -- Preface -- Acknowledgements -- Notes on Contributors -- Introduction; Z.Radman -- The Mystery of the Background qua Background; H.L.Dreyfus -- PART I: ECHOING SEARLE'S AND DREYFUS' VIEWS ON THE BACKGROUND -- Ground-Level Intelligence:Action-Oriented Representation and the Dynamics of the Background; M.Cappuccio& M.Wheeler -- Exposing the Background: Deep and Local; D.D.Hutto -- The Background as Intentional, Conscious, and Nonconceptual; M.Schmitz -- Social Cognition, the Chinese Room, and the Robot Replies; S.Gallagher -- Contesting John's Searle' Social (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000