Search results for 'laws of physics' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Nancy Cartwright (1983). How the Laws of Physics Lie. Oxford University Press.
    In this sequence of philosophical essays about natural science, the author argues that fundamental explanatory laws, the deepest and most admired successes of modern physics, do not in fact describe regularities that exist in nature. Cartwright draws from many real-life examples to propound a novel distinction: that theoretical entities, and the complex and localized laws that describe them, can be interpreted realistically, but the simple unifying laws of basic theory cannot.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   379 citations  
  2.  20
    Renat Nugayev (1991). The Fundamental Laws of Physics Can Tell the Truth. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5 (1):79 – 87.
    INTERNATIONAL STUDIES IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Vol. 5, number 1, Autumn 1991, pp. 79-87. R.M. Nugayev. -/- The fundamental laws of physics can tell the truth. -/- Abstract. Nancy Cartwright’s arguments in favour of phenomenological laws and against fundamental ones are discussed. Her criticisms of the standard cjvering-law account are extended using Vyacheslav Stepin’s analysis of the structure of fundamental theories. It is argued that Cartwright’s thesis 9that the laws of physics lie) is too (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3.  54
    Paul Davies (2010). The Nature of the Laws of Physics and Their Mysterious Bio-Friendliness. In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell 767--788.
    This chapter contains sections titled: * 1 The Universe Is Weirdly Fine-Tuned for Life * 2 The Cosmic Code * 3 The Concept of Laws * 4 Are the Laws Real? * 5 Does a Multiverse Explain the Goldilocks Enigma? * 6 Many Scientists Hate the Multiverse Idea * 7 Who Designed the Multiverse? * 8 If There Were a Unique Final Theory, God Would Be Redundant * 9 What Exists and What Doesn’t: Who or What Gets (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  35
    Edgar Zilsel (1941). Physics and the Problem of Historico-Sociological Laws. Philosophy of Science 8 (4):567-579.
    The question as to the existence of laws in history has frequently been discussed. A new a discussion may yet be useful, since some mis- conceptions based on incorrect comparisons with the natural sciences have been brought forward by both advocates and opponents of historical laws. We shall try to clarify the problem by applying a few ideas familiar to physicists and astronomers to the condi- tions peculiar to history. Physics is the most mature of all empirical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5. Victor J. Stenger (2006). The Comprehensible Cosmos: Where Do the Laws of Physics Come From? Prometheus Books.
    What are the laws of physics? -- The stuff that kicks back -- Point-of-view invariance -- Gauging the laws of physics -- Forces and broken symmetries -- Playing dice -- After the bang -- Out of the void -- The comprehensible cosmos -- Models of reality.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Geert Keil (2005). How the Ceteris Paribus Laws of Physics Lie. In Jan Faye, Paul Needham, Uwe Scheffler & Max Urchs (eds.), Nature's Principles. Springer 167-200.
    After a brief survey of the literature on ceteris paribus clauses and ceteris paribus laws (1), the problem of exceptions, which creates the need for cp laws, is discussed (2). It emerges that the so-called skeptical view of laws of nature does not apply to laws of any kind whatever. Only some laws of physics are plagued with exceptions, not THE laws (3). Cp clauses promise a remedy, which has to be located among (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7.  90
    Ulrich Mohrhoff (2002). Why the Laws of Physics Are Just So. Foundations of Physics 32 (8):1313-1324.
    Does a world that contains chemistry entail the validity of both the standard model of elementary particle physics and general relativity, at least as effective theories? This article shows that the answer may very well be affirmative. It further suggests that the very existence of stable, spatially extended material objects, if not the very existence of the physical world, may require the validity of these theories.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  8.  28
    Roger Penrose (2011). Godel, the Mind, and the Laws of Physics. In Matthias Baaz (ed.), Kurt Gödel and the Foundations of Mathematics: Horizons of Truth. Cambridge University Press 339.
    Gödel appears to have believed strongly that the human mind cannot be explained in terms of any kind of computational physics, but he remained cautious in formulating this belief as a rigorous consequence of his incompleteness theorems. In this chapter, I discuss a modification of standard Gödel-type logical arguments, these appearing to strengthen Gödel’s conclusions, and attempt to provide a persuasive case in support of his standpoint that the actions of the mind must transcend computation. It appears that Gödel (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9. P. P. Allport (1993). Are the Laws of Physics 'Economical with the Truth'? Synthese 94 (2):245 - 290.
    It has been argued that the fundamental laws of physics are deceitful in that they give the impression of greater unity and coherence in our theories than is actually found to be the case. Causal stories and phenomenological relationships are claimed to provide a more acceptable account of the world, and only theoretical entities — not laws — are considered as perhaps corresponding to real features of the world.This paper examines these claims in the light of the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  8
    Rinat M. Nugayev (1992). How the Laws of Physics Can Be Confronted with Experience. Theoria Et Historia Scientiarum:24-36.
    Nancy Cartwright’s arguments in favor of the phenomenological laws and against the fundamental ones are discussed. I support and strengthen her criticism of the standard covering-law account but I am skeptical in respect to her radical conclusion that the laws of physics lie. Arguments in favor of the opposite stance are based on V.S. Stepin’s analysis of mature theory structure. A mature theory-change model presented here demonstrates how the fundamental laws of physics can be confronted (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  58
    A. David Kline & Carl A. Matheson (1986). How the Laws of Physics Don't Even Fib. Psa 1986:33--41.
    The most recent challenge to the covering-law model of explanation (N. Cartwright, How the laws of Physics Lie) charges that the fundamental explanatory laws are not true. In fact explanation and truth are alleged to pull in different directions. We hold that this gets its force from confusing issues about the truth of the laws in the explanation and the precision with which those laws can yield an exact description of the event to be explained. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12. Yuri Balashov, Laws of Physics and the Universe.
    Are the laws of nature real? Do they belong to the world or merely reflect the way we speak about it? And if they are real, what sort of entity are they? These questions have been intensely debated by philosophers. Modern cosmology, however, has given such questions a new twist by introducing a unique perspective on physical reality, the perspective which I shall call the cosmological point of view. In this perspective, the universe as a whole presents itself as (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  13. David Jon Spurrett (1999). Fundamental Laws and the Completeness of Physics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 13 (3):261 – 274.
    The status of fundamental laws is an important issue when deciding between the three broad ontological options of fundamentalism (of which the thesis that physics is complete is typically a sub-type), emergentism, and disorder or promiscuous realism. Cartwright’s assault on fundamental laws which argues that such laws do not, and cannot, typically state the facts, and hence cannot be used to support belief in a fundamental ontological order, is discussed in this context. A case is (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  19
    Roger Penrose (1999). The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. OUP Oxford.
    In his bestselling work of popular science, Sir Roger Penrose takes us on a fascinating roller-coaster ride through the basic principles of physics, cosmology, mathematics, and philosophy to show that human thinking can never be emulated by a machine.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   20 citations  
  15.  98
    Alan Chalmers (1999). Making Sense of Laws of Physics. In Howard Sankey (ed.), Causation and Laws of Nature. Kluwer 3--16.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  16. John Earman, Christopher Smeenk & Christian Wüthrich (2009). Do the Laws of Physics Forbid the Operation of Time Machines? Synthese 169 (1):91 - 124.
    We address the question of whether it is possible to operate a time machine by manipulating matter and energy so as to manufacture closed timelike curves. This question has received a great deal of attention in the physics literature, with attempts to prove no-go theorems based on classical general relativity and various hybrid theories serving as steps along the way towards quantum gravity. Despite the effort put into these no-go theorems, there is no widely accepted definition of a time (...)
    Direct download (12 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   8 citations  
  17.  1
    Ricardo Karam (2015). Obtaining Laws Through Quantifying Experiments: Justifications of Pre-Service Physics Teachers in the Case of Electric Current, Voltage and Resistance. Science and Education 24 (5 - 6):699-723.
    The language of physics is mathematics, and physics ideas, laws and models describing phenomena are usually represented in mathematical form. Therefore, an understanding of how to navigate between phenomena and the models representing them in mathematical form is important for a physics teacher so that the teacher can make physics understandable to students. Here, the focus is on the “experimental mathematization,” how laws are established through quantifying experiments. A sequence from qualitative experiments to mathematical (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Roger Penrose (2016). The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford University Press Uk.
    For many decades, the proponents of `artificial intelligence' have maintained that computers will soon be able to do everything that a human can do. In his bestselling work of popular science, Sir Roger Penrose takes us on a fascinating tour through the basic principles of physics, cosmology, mathematics, and philosophy to show that human thinking can never be emulated by a machine.Oxford Landmark Science books are 'must-read' classics of modern science writing which have crystallized big ideas, and shaped the (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  77
    Christian Wüthrich (2009). Do the Laws of Physics Forbid the Operation of Time Machines? Synthese 169 (1):91 - 124.
    We address the question of whether it is possible to operate a time machine by manipulating matter and energy so as to manufacture closed timelike curves. This question has received a great deal of attention in the physics literature, with attempts to prove no- go theorems based on classical general relativity and various hybrid theories serving as steps along the way towards quantum gravity. Despite the effort put into these no-go theorems, there is no widely accepted definition of a (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  62
    Aaron Sloman (1992). The Emperor's Real Mind -- Review of Roger Penrose's The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers Minds and the Laws of Physics. Artificial Intelligence 56 (2-3):355-396.
    "The Emperor's New Mind" by Roger Penrose has received a great deal of both praise and criticism. This review discusses philosophical aspects of the book that form an attack on the "strong" AI thesis. Eight different versions of this thesis are distinguished, and sources of ambiguity diagnosed, including different requirements for relationships between program and behaviour. Excessively strong versions attacked by Penrose (and Searle) are not worth defending or attacking, whereas weaker versions remain problematic. Penrose (like Searle) regards the notion (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  59
    Ronald Laymon (1989). Cartwright and the Lying Laws of Physics. Journal of Philosophy 86 (7):353-372.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  22.  64
    Marc Lange (2009). Must the Fundamental Laws of Physics Be Complete? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (2):312-345.
    The beauty of electricity, or of any other force, is not that the power is mysterious and unexpected, touching every sense at unawares in turn, but that it is under law... Michael Faraday, Wheatstone's Electric Telegraph's Relation to Science (being an argument in favour of the full recognition of Science as a branch of Education), 1854.
    No categories
    Direct download (13 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  23.  65
    Alan Chalmers (1993). So the Laws of Physics Needn't Lie. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 71 (2):196 – 205.
  24.  20
    Kenneth G. Wilson, George E. Smith, Constance K. Barsky & Stanislaw D. Glazek (2010). Could Testing of the Laws of Physics Ever BE Complete? In Harald Fritzsch & K. K. Phua (eds.), Proceedings of the Conference in Honour of Murray Gell-Mann's 80th Birthday. World Scientific
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  38
    Malcolm R. Forster (1985). Book Review:How the Laws of Physics Lie Nancy Cartwright. [REVIEW] Philosophy of Science 52 (3):478-.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  34
    Allan Franklin, Are the Laws of Physics Inevitable?
    Social constructionists believe that experimental evidence plays a minimal role in the production of scientific knowledge, while rationalists such as myself believe that experimental evidence is crucial in it. As one historical example in support of the rationalist position, I trace in some detail the theoretical and experimental research that led to our understanding of beta decay, from Enrico Fermi’s pioneering theory of 1934 to George Sudarshan and Robert Marshak’s and Richard Feynman and Murray Gell-Mann’s suggestion in 1957 and 1958, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    Arthur Fine (1984). How the Laws of Physics Lie by Nancy Cartwright. [REVIEW] Isis: A Journal of the History of Science 75:386-387.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. David Park (1975). Laws of Physics and Ideas of Time. In J. T. Fraser & Nathaniel M. Lawrence (eds.), The Study of Time Ii. Springer-Verlag 258--266.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Nancy Cartwright (1980). Do the Laws of Physics State the Facts? In M. Curd & J. A. Cover (eds.), Pacific Philosophical Quarterly. Norton 865-877.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  30.  26
    Jonathan Walmsley (1998). How the Laws of Physics Still Lie. The Philosophers' Magazine 4:36-38.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  68
    Oliver Schulte (2000). Inferring Conservation Laws in Particle Physics: A Case Study in the Problem of Induction. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):771-806.
    This paper develops a means–end analysis of an inductive problem that arises in particle physics: how to infer from observed reactions conservation principles that govern all reactions among elementary particles. I show that there is a reliable inference procedure that is guaranteed to arrive at an empirically adequate set of conservation principles as more and more evidence is obtained. An interesting feature of reliable procedures for finding conservation principles is that in certain precisely defined circumstances they must introduce hidden (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  32.  20
    James H. Fetzer (1985). How the Laws of Physics Lie. [REVIEW] Philosophical Books 26 (2):120-124.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33.  76
    Mary Tiles (1985). How the Laws of Physics Lie By Nancy Cartwright Oxford University Press, 1983, 221 Pp., £7.95Representing and Intervening By Ian Hacking Cambridge University Press, 1983, Xv + 287 Pp., £20.00, £5.95 Paper. [REVIEW] Philosophy 60 (231):133-.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34.  28
    Harold I. Brown (1988). How the Laws of Physics Lie. [REVIEW] International Studies in Philosophy 20 (3):102-103.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35. Richard Rorty (1997). Thomas Kuhn, Rocks, and the Laws of Physics. Common Knowledge 6:6-16.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36.  4
    M. L. G. Redhead (1984). Nancy Cartwright, "How the Laws of Physics Lie". [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 34 (37):513.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. C. Dilworth (1987). Review of HOW the Laws of Physics Lie, by N. Cartwright. [REVIEW] Epistemologia 10:143-145.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38.  8
    Yvon Gauthier (1984). How the Laws of Physics Lie Nancy Cartwright Oxford: Clarendon Press; New York: Oxford University Press, 1983. 221 P. Dialogue 23 (3):522-525.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Jeffrey Bub (1985). Nancy Cartwright, How The Laws of Physics Lie Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 5 (3):104-107.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Orest Bedrij (2000). Revelation and Verification of Ultimate Reality and Meaning Through Direct Experience and the Laws of Physics. Ultimate Reality and Meaning 23 (1):36-84.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Jeffrey Bub (1985). Nancy Cartwright, How The Laws of Physics Lie. [REVIEW] Philosophy in Review 5:104-107.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. R. Hughes (1999). Laws of Nature, Laws of Physics, and the Representational Account of Theories. Protosociology 12.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  43. Władysław Krajewski (1986). Czy prawa fizyki są prawdziwe? (N. Cartwright, \"How the Laws of Physics Lie\", New York 1983). [REVIEW] Studia Filozoficzne 246 (5).
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Carlos P. Otero (1990). The Emergence of Homo Loquens and the Laws of Physics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13 (4):747-750.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  12
    D. Costantini & U. Garibaldi (1996). Predictive Laws of Association in Statistics and Physics. Erkenntnis 45 (2-3):399 - 422.
    In the present paper we face the problem of estimating cell probabilities in the case of a two-dimensional contingency table from a predictive point of view. The solution is given by a double stochastic process. The first subprocess, the unobservable one, is supposed to be exchangeable and invariant. For the second subprocess, the observable one, we suppose it is independent conditional on the first one.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  36
    Karl Schmidt (1933). The Existential Status of Facts and Laws in Physics. The Monist 43 (2):161-172.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  10
    Thomas E. Phipps Jr (1990). Weber-Type Laws of Action-at-a-Distance in Modern Physics. Apeiron 8:8-14.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48. Lydia Jaeger (2010). The Contingency of Laws of Nature in Science and Theology. Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1611-1624.
    The belief that laws of nature are contingent played an important role in the emergence of the empirical method of modern physics. During the scientific revolution, this belief was based on the idea of voluntary creation. Taking up Peter Mittelstaedt’s work on laws of nature, this article explores several alternative answers which do not overtly make use of metaphysics: some laws are laws of mathematics; macroscopic laws can emerge from the interplay of numerous subsystems (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  49.  40
    Jon Dorling (1978). On Explanations in Physics: Sketch of an Alternative to Hempel's Account of the Explanation of Laws. Philosophy of Science 45 (1):136-140.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Laurence Devillairs (2001). Leibnizian Mathematics and Physics-(2e Partie) Divine Immutability as the Foundation of Nature Laws in Descartes and the Arguments Involved in Leibnizs Criticism. Revue d'Histoire des Sciences 54 (3):303-324.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000