Search results for 'liberal feminism' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  40
    Black Feminism (1995). A Black Feminist Statement. In Beverly Guy-Sheftal (ed.), Words of Fire: An Anthology of African American Feminist Thought. The New Press
  2.  54
    Simon Căbulea May (2012). Liberal Feminism and the Ethics of Polygamy. In Daniela Cutas & Sarah Chan (eds.), Families - Beyond the Nuclear Ideal. Bloomsbury Academic
    I distinguish two ways that a cultural practice may be inherently objectionable. I reject the claim that polygamy is inherently "vicious" because asymmetric marriages are inevitably inegalitarian. I argue that there is good reason to think polygamy is inherently "bankrupt" insofar as a cultural ideal of asymmetric marriage presupposes stereotypical gender roles.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3. Mariana Szapuova (2006). Mill's Liberal Feminism: Its Legacy and Current Criticism. Prolegomena 5 (2):179-191.
    This paper highlights John Stuart Mill’s views on the problem of gender equality as expressed in The Subjection of Women, which is commonly regarded as one of the core texts of Enlightenment liberal feminism of the 19th century. In this paper, the author outlines the historical context of both Mill’s views and his personal biography, which influenced his argumentation for the emancipation of women, and considers Mill’s utilitarianism and liberalism, as the main philosophical background for his criticism of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  51
    Susan Wendell (1987). A (Qualified) Defense of Liberal Feminism. Hypatia 2 (2):65 - 93.
    Liberal feminism is not committed to a number of philosophical positions for which it is frequently criticized, including abstract individualism, certain individualistic approaches to morality and society, valuing the mental/rational over the physical/emotional, and the traditional liberal way of drawing the line between the public and the private. Moreover, liberal feminism's clearest political commitments, including equality of opportunity, are important to women's liberation and not necessarily incompatible with the goals of socialist and radical feminism.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  73
    L. Ryan Musgrave (2003). Liberal Feminism, From Law to Art: The Impact of Feminist Jurisprudence on Feminist Aesthetics. Hypatia 18 (4):214-235.
    : This essay explores how early approaches in feminist aesthetics drew on concepts honed in the field of feminist legal theory, especially conceptions of oppression and equality. I argue that by importing these feminist legal concepts, many early feminist accounts of how art is political depended largely on a distinctly liberal version of politics. I offer a critique of liberal feminist aesthetics, indicating ways recent work in the field also turns toward critical feminist aesthetics as an alternative.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  11
    Loretta Kensinger (1997). (In)Quest of Liberal Feminism. Hypatia 12 (4):178 - 197.
    I am interested in exploring the usefulness and limits of traditional categories of feminist theory, such as those laid out by Alison Jaggar (1977; 1983). I begin the analysis by critically comparing various treatments of liberal feminism. I focus throughout this investigation on uncovering ways that current frameworks privilege white authors and concerns, recreate the split between theory and activism, and obscure long histories of theoretical and practical coalition and alliance work.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7. Amy Baehr (2013). Liberal Feminism: Comprehensive and Political. In Feminist Interpretations of John Rawls. 150-166.
  8. L. Susan Brown (1993). The Politics of Individualism Liberalism, Liberal Feminism and Anarchism. Monograph Collection (Matt - Pseudo).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  2
    Hagar Kotef (2009). On Abstractness: First Wave Liberal Feminism and the Construction of the Abstract Woman. Feminist Studies 35 (3):495-522.
  10. Kristina Rolin (2004). Three Decades of Feminism in Science: From?Liberal Feminism? And?Difference Feminism? To Gender Analysis of Science. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 19 (1):292-296.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11. Wendy Donner (1993). John Stuart Mill's Liberal Feminism. Philosophical Studies 69 (2-3):155 - 166.
  12.  14
    Amy R. Baehr (2013). Liberal Feminism. In Edward Zalta (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  13.  25
    Susan Hekman (1992). John Stuart Mill'sthe Subjection of Women: The Foundations of Liberal Feminism. History of European Ideas 15 (4-6):681-686.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  14.  50
    Ruth E. Groenhout (2002). Essentialist Challenges to Liberal Feminism. Social Theory and Practice 28 (1):51-75.
  15.  5
    Chairperson June Purvis & Joyce Senders Pedersen (1996). The Historiography of the Women's Movement in Victorian and Edwardian England: Varieties of Contemporary Liberal Feminist Interpretation. The European Legacy 1 (3):1052-1057.
  16.  55
    Kristina Rolin (2004). Three Decades of Feminism in Science: From "Liberal Feminism" and "Difference Feminism" to Gender Analysis of Science. [REVIEW] Hypatia 19 (1):292 - 296.
  17.  5
    Joyce S. Pedersen (1999). Love, Politics, and the Victorians: Liberal Feminism and the Politics of Social Integration. The European Legacy 4 (6):42-57.
  18.  2
    L. Ryan Musgrave (2003). Liberal Feminism, From Law to Art: The Impact of Feminist Jurisprudence on Feminist Aesthetics. Hypatia 18 (4):214-235.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  2
    Kristina Rolin (2004). Three Decades of Feminism in Science: From “Liberal Feminism” and “Difference Feminism” to Gender Analysis of Science. Hypatia 19 (1):292-296.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20.  7
    Julinna C. Oxley (2011). Liberal Feminism. In Michael Bruce & Steven Barbone (eds.), Just the Arguments: 100 of the Most Important Arguments in Western Philosophy. Wiley-Blackwell 258--262.
  21.  6
    Susan Leigh Anderson (1987). Criticisms of Liberal/Feminist Views on Abortion. Public Affairs Quarterly 1 (2):83-96.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  4
    Karen Offen (1987). Pariahs Stand Up! The Founding of the Liberal Feminist Movement in France, 1858–1889. History of European Ideas 8 (6):726-729.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  5
    Chairperson Mary Nash & Tjitske Akkerman (1996). Liberal Feminism and the Language of Slavery: A Legacy of the Colonial Past? The European Legacy 1 (3):975-980.
  24.  1
    Susan Wendell (1987). A Defense of Liberal Feminism. Hypatia 2 (2):65-93.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  8
    Gail Tulloch (1989). Mill's Epistemology in Practice in His Liberal Feminism. Educational Philosophy and Theory 21 (2):32–39.
  26.  3
    Joyce Senders Pedersen (1987). Education, Gender and Social Change in Victorian Liberal Feminist Theory. History of European Ideas 8 (4-5):503-519.
    The author would like to thank Karen Offen, David Nye and her husband Johannes Pedersen for helpful criticisms they offered of an earlier draft of this essay.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  2
    Robert Almeder (1994). Liberal Feminism and Academic Feminism. Public Affairs Quarterly 8 (4):299-315.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Loretta Kensinger (1997). Quest of Liberal Feminism. Hypatia 12 (4):178-197.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Lisa Schwartzman (1999). Liberal Rights Theory and Social Inequality: A Feminist Critique. Hypatia 14 (2):26-47.
    : Liberal rights theory can be used either to challenge or to support social hierarchies of power. Focusing on Ronald Dworkin's theory of rights and Catharine MacKinnon's feminist critique of liberalism, I identify a number of problems with the way that liberal theorists conceptualize rights. I argue that rights can be used to chal-lenge oppressive practices and structures only if they are defined and employed with an awareness and critique of social relations of power.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Elizabeth Brake (2004). Rawls and Feminism: What Should Feminists Make of Liberal Neutrality? Journal of Moral Philosophy 1 (3):293-309.
    the issue of liberal neutrality, a topic suggested by the work of Catharine MacKinnon. I discuss two kinds of neutrality: neutrality at the level of justifying liberalism itself, and state neutrality in political decision-making. Both kinds are contentious within liberal theory. Rawls’s argument for justice as fairness has been criticized for non-neutrality at the justificatory level, a problem noted by Rawls himself in Political Liberalism . I will defend a qualified account of neutrality at the justificatory level, taking (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  18
    Maria Christine Bernadetta Voet (1995). Feminism and Citizenship: Feminist Critiques of the Concept of Social-Liberal Citizenship. M.C.B. Voet.
    Until recently, feminist theory and citizenship theory have seemed two distinct areas, with writers in both camps seldom discussing the other's work.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. Elizabeth Frazer (1993). The Politics of Community: A Feminist Critique of the Liberal-Communitarian Debate. University of Toronto Press.
  33. Kate Nash (1998). Universal Difference: Feminism and the Liberal Undecidability of "Women". St. Martin's Press.
  34. Lisa Schwartzman (1999). Liberal Rights Theory and Social Inequality: A Feminist Critique. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy 14 (2):26-47.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  6
    Michael Burke (2012). A Feminist Reconstruction of Liberal Rights and Sport. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 37 (1):11-28.
  36.  20
    Marion Tapper (1986). Can a Feminist Be a Liberal? Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64 (sup1):37-47.
  37.  20
    Valerie R. Renegar & Stacey K. Sowards (2003). Liberal Irony, Rhetoric, and Feminist Thought: A Unifying Third Wave Feminist Theory. Philosophy and Rhetoric 36 (4):330-352.
  38. Frazer Elizabeth & Lacey Nicola (1997). [Book Review] the Politics of Community, a Feminist Critique of the Liberal-Communitarian Debate. [REVIEW] Social Theory and Practice 23 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  39.  36
    Gordon Graham (1994). Liberal Vs Radical Feminism Revisited. Journal of Applied Philosophy 11 (2):155-170.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  18
    John Exdell (1994). Feminism, Fundamentalism, and Liberal Legitimacy. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):441 - 463.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  15
    Samantha Brennan, The Liberal Rights of Feminist Liberalism.
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  13
    Kevin M. Graham (2002). The Ideal of Objectivity in Political Dialogue: Liberal and Feminist Approaches. Social Epistemology 16 (3):295 – 309.
  43.  14
    Amy R. Baehr (2003). A Feminist Liberal Approach to Hate Crime Legislation. Journal of Social Philosophy 34 (1):134–152.
  44.  4
    Mihaela Frunza (2010). Feminismul ca/si ideologie/ Feminism as/and Ideology. Journal for the Study of Religions and Ideologies 2 (6):4-28.
    This paper analyses the relations between feminism and its various ideological cores. Three tendancies are discussed here: acceptance of the ideological core, criticism and rejection of this core and, more intricately, acceptance of one core and rejection of the other. The emphasis is placed on Anglo- American second-wave liberal feminism, whose ideological nature is almost unanomously accepted, in all the meanings of the term – positive, negative, and neutral. The author adopts Christine di Stefano’s idea, that a (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  1
    Joyce Pedersen (1994). Liberal Ideals and Feminist Organisation in Victorian England: One Cause or Many? History of European Ideas 19 (4-6):733-739.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46.  6
    Michaeleen J. Kelly (1994). Rights and Power: A Feminist Re-Thinking of Liberal Rights. Journal of Social Philosophy 25 (2):73-88.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  1
    Naomi Zack (2014). Proposal for a Feminist Kantian Liberal Obligation to Resist Oppression. [REVIEW] Radical Philosophy Review 17 (1):313-317.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Gregory Bassham (1992). Feminist Legal Theory: A Liberal Response. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy 6 (2):293-320.
  49. Ratna Kapur (2010). Emancipatory Feminist Theory in Postcolonial India: Unmasking the Ruse of Liberal Internationalism. In Aakash Singh & Silika Mohapatra (eds.), Indian Political Thought: A Reader. Routledge
  50. Johanna Oksala (2011). The Neo-Liberal Subject of Feminism: From Discipline to Self-Advancement. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 42 (1):104.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000