165 found
Order:
Disambiguations:
Alan C. Love [33]Bradley C. Love [25]Nancy S. Love [8]Alan Love [8]
Jeff Love [6]Nancy Sue Love [6]Frederick R. Love [5]Rosaleen Love [4]

Not all matches are shown. Search with initial or firstname to single out others.

See also:
Profile: Alan Love (University of Minnesota)
Profile: Jamie Love (Barstow College)
Profile: Archer Love
Profile: Lisa Love (Riverside Community College)
Profile: Ally Love
Profile: Lawrence Love
Profile: Awesome Love
Profile: Martha Char Love (Sonoma State University)
Profile: Becka Love (Mount Royal University)
Profile: Mathew Love
Other users were found but are not shown.
  1.  12
    Matt Jones & Bradley C. Love (2011). Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment? On the Explanatory Status and Theoretical Contributions of Bayesian Models of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (4):169-188.
    The prominence of Bayesian modeling of cognition has increased recently largely because of mathematical advances in specifying and deriving predictions from complex probabilistic models. Much of this research aims to demonstrate that cognitive behavior can be explained from rational principles alone, without recourse to psychological or neurological processes and representations. We note commonalities between this rational approach and other movements in psychology that set aside mechanistic explanations or make use of optimality assumptions. Through these comparisons, we identify a number of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  2. Ingo Brigandt & Alan Love, Reductionism in Biology. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Reductionism encompasses a set of ontological, epistemological, and methodological claims about the relation of different scientific domains. The basic question of reduction is whether the properties, concepts, explanations, or methods from one scientific domain (typically at higher levels of organization) can be deduced from or explained by the properties, concepts, explanations, or methods from another domain of science (typically one about lower levels of organization). Reduction is germane to a variety of issues in philosophy of science, including the structure of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   21 citations  
  3.  12
    Ingo Brigandt & Alan C. Love (2012). Conceptualizing Evolutionary Novelty: Moving Beyond Definitional Debates. Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution 318:417-427.
    According to many biologists, explaining the evolution of morphological novelty and behavioral innovation are central endeavors in contemporary evolutionary biology. These endeavors are inherently multidisciplinary but also have involved a high degree of controversy. One key source of controversy is the definitional diversity associated with the concept of evolutionary novelty, which can lead to contradictory claims (a novel trait according to one definition is not a novel trait according to another). We argue that this diversity should be interpreted in light (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   12 citations  
  4.  7
    Alan C. Love & Gary L. Lugar (2013). Dimensions of Integration in Interdisciplinary Explanations of the Origin of Evolutionary Novelty. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4):537-550.
    Many philosophers of biology have embraced a version of pluralism in response to the failure of theory reduction but overlook how concepts, methods, and explanatory resources are in fact coordinated, such as in interdisciplinary research where the aim is to integrate different strands into an articulated whole. This is observable for the origin of evolutionary novelty—a complex problem that requires a synthesis of intellectual resources from different fields to arrive at robust answers to multiple allied questions. It is an apt (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  5. M. Jones & B. C. Love (forthcoming). Bayesian Fundamentalism or Enlightenment. Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
  6.  12
    Bradley C. Love (forthcoming). Cognitive Models as Bridge Between Brain and Behavior. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  50
    Alan C. Love (2008). Explaining Evolutionary Innovations and Novelties: Criteria of Explanatory Adequacy and Epistemological Prerequisites. Philosophy of Science 75 (5):874-886.
    It is a common complaint that antireductionist arguments are primarily negative. Here I describe an alternative nonreductionist epistemology based on considerations taken from multidisciplinary research in biology. The core of this framework consists in seeing investigation as coordinated around sets of problems (problem agendas) that have associated criteria of explanatory adequacy. These ideas are developed in a case study, the explanation of evolutionary innovations and novelties, which demonstrates the applicability and fruitfulness of this nonreductionist epistemological perspective. This account also bears (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   15 citations  
  8.  6
    Steven A. Sloman, Bradley C. Love & Woo‐Kyoung Ahn (1998). Feature Centrality and Conceptual Coherence. Cognitive Science 22 (2):189-228.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   32 citations  
  9.  19
    Alan C. Love (2013). Erratum To: Theory is as Theory Does: Scientific Practice and Theory Structure in Biology. [REVIEW] Biological Theory 7 (4):430 - 430.
    Using the context of controversies surrounding evolutionary developmental biology (EvoDevo) and the possibility of an Extended Evolutionary Synthesis, I provide an account of theory structure as idealized theory presentations that are always incomplete (partial) and shaped by their conceptual content (material rather than formal organization). These two characteristics are salient because the goals that organize and regulate scientific practice, including the activity of using a theory, are heterogeneous. This means that the same theory can be structured differently, in part because (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  10.  47
    Alan Love (2009). Typology Reconfigured: From the Metaphysics of Essentialism to the Epistemology of Representation. Acta Biotheoretica 57 (1-2):51-75.
    The goal of this paper is to encourage a reconfiguration of the discussion about typology in biology away from the metaphysics of essentialism and toward the epistemology of classifying natural phenomena for the purposes of empirical inquiry. First, I briefly review arguments concerning ‘typological thinking’, essentialism, species, and natural kinds, highlighting their predominantly metaphysical nature. Second, I use a distinction between the aims, strategies, and tactics of science to suggest how a shift from metaphysics to epistemology might be accomplished. Typological (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  11.  5
    Alan C. Love & Marco J. Nathan (2015). The Idealization of Causation in Mechanistic Explanation. Philosophy of Science 82 (5):761-774.
    Causal relations among components and activities are intentionally misrepresented in mechanistic explanations found routinely across the life sciences. Since several mechanists explicitly advocate accurately representing factors that make a difference to the outcome, these idealizations conflict with the stated rationale for mechanistic explanation. We argue that these idealizations signal an overlooked feature of reasoning in molecular and cell biology—mechanistic explanations do not occur in isolation—and suggest that explanatory practices within the mechanistic tradition share commonalities with model-based approaches prevalent in population (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  12.  75
    Andreas Hüttemann & Alan C. Love (2011). Aspects of Reductive Explanation in Biological Science: Intrinsicality, Fundamentality, and Temporality. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (3):519-549.
    The inapplicability of variations on theory reduction in the context of genetics and their irrelevance to ongoing research has led to an anti-reductionist consensus in philosophy of biology. One response to this situation is to focus on forms of reductive explanation that better correspond to actual scientific reasoning (e.g. part–whole relations). Working from this perspective, we explore three different aspects (intrinsicality, fundamentality, and temporality) that arise from distinct facets of reductive explanation: composition and causation. Concentrating on these aspects generates new (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  13. Alan C. Love & Andreas Hüttemann (2011). COMPARING PART-WHOLE REDUCTIVE EXPLANATIONS IN BIOLOGY AND PHYSICS. In Dennis Dieks, Wenceslao Gonzalo, Thomas Uebel, Stephan Hartmann & Marcel Weber (eds.), Explanation, Prediction, and Confirmation. Springer 183--202.
    Many biologists and philosophers have worried that importing models of reasoning from the physical sciences obscures our understanding of reasoning in the life sciences. In this paper we discuss one example that partially validates this concern: part-whole reductive explanations. Biology and physics tend to incorporate different models of temporality in part-whole reductive explanations. This results from differential emphases on compositional and causal facets of reductive explanations, which have not been distinguished reliably in prior philosophical analyses. Keeping these two facets distinct (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  14. Alan C. Love (2013). Experiments, Intuitions and Images of Philosophy and Science. Analysis 73 (4):785-797.
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  31
    Alan C. Love (2003). Evolutionary Morphology, Innovation, and the Synthesis of Evolutionary and Developmental Biology. Biology and Philosophy 18 (2):309-345.
    One foundational question in contemporarybiology is how to `rejoin evolution anddevelopment. The emerging research program(evolutionary developmental biology or`evo-devo) requires a meshing of disciplines,concepts, and explanations that have beendeveloped largely in independence over the pastcentury. In the attempt to comprehend thepresent separation between evolution anddevelopment much attention has been paid to thesplit between genetics and embryology in theearly part of the 20th century with itscodification in the exclusion of embryologyfrom the Modern Synthesis. This encourages acharacterization of evolutionary developmentalbiology as (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   16 citations  
  16.  51
    Alan C. Love (2007). Functional Homology and Homology of Function: Biological Concepts and Philosophical Consequences. Biology and Philosophy 22 (5):691-708.
    “Functional homology” appears regularly in different areas of biological research and yet it is apparently a contradiction in terms—homology concerns identity of structure regardless of form and function. I argue that despite this conceptual tension there is a legitimate conception of ‘homology of function’, which can be recovered by utilizing a distinction from pre-Darwinian physiology (use versus activity) to identify an appropriate meaning of ‘function’. This account is directly applicable to molecular developmental biology and shares a connection to the theme (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  17.  9
    F. W. J. Schelling, Jeff Love & Johannes Schmidt (eds.) (2006). Philosophical Investigations Into the Essence of Human Freedom. State University of New York Press.
    Schelling’s masterpiece investigating evil and freedom.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  18.  15
    Bradley C. Love (2015). The Algorithmic Level Is the Bridge Between Computation and Brain. Topics in Cognitive Science 7 (2):230-242.
    Every scientist chooses a preferred level of analysis and this choice shapes the research program, even determining what counts as evidence. This contribution revisits Marr's three levels of analysis and evaluates the prospect of making progress at each individual level. After reviewing limitations of theorizing within a level, two strategies for integration across levels are considered. One is top–down in that it attempts to build a bridge from the computational to algorithmic level. Limitations of this approach include insufficient theoretical constraint (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19. Kim A. Bard, Brenda K. Todd, Chris Bernier, Jennifer Love & David A. Leavens (2006). Self-Awareness in Human and Chimpanzee Infants: What is Measured and What is Meant by the Mark and Mirror Test? Infancy 9 (2):191-219.
  20. Veljko Jeremic, Dragan Vukmirovic, Zoran Radojicic, Todd M. Gureckis, Bradley C. Love, Michael D. Lee, Barbara W. Sarnecka, Bruno Estigarribia, Kentaro Nakatani & Edward Gibson (2010). Subject Index to Volume 34. Cognitive Science 34:1596-1601.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  25
    Maureen O'Malley, Ingo Brigandt, Alan C. Love, John W. Crawford, Jack A. Gilbert, Rob Knight, Sandra D. Mitchell & Forest Rohwer (2014). Multilevel Research Strategies and Biological Systems. Philosophy of Science 81 (5):811-828.
    Multilevel research strategies characterize contemporary molecular inquiry into biological systems. We outline conceptual, methodological, and explanatory dimensions of these multilevel strategies in microbial ecology, systems biology, protein research, and developmental biology. This review of emerging lines of inquiry in these fields suggests that multilevel research in molecular life sciences has significant implications for philosophical understandings of explanation, modeling, and representation.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  3
    Levi B. Larkey & Bradley C. Love (2003). CAB: Connectionist Analogy Builder. Cognitive Science 27 (5):781-794.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  23.  99
    Divine Love (2009). We Acknowledge with Thanks Receipt of the Following Titles. Inclusion in This List Neither Implies nor Precludes Subsequent. Studies in Christian Ethics 22:510-512.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Nancy Sue Love (2002). "Singing for Our Lives": Women's Music and Democratic Politics. Hypatia 17 (4):71-94.
    : Although democratic theorists often employ musical metaphors to describe their politics, musical practices are seldom analyzed as forms of political communication. In this article, I explore how the music of social movements, what is called "movement music," supplements deliberative democrats' concept of public discourse as rational argument. Invoking energies, motions, and voices beyond established identities and institutions anticipates a different, more musical democracy. I argue that the "women's music" of Holly Near, founder of Redwood Records and Redwood Cultural Work, (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25.  8
    Alan C. Love (2015). ChINs, Swarms, and Variational Modalities: Concepts in the Service of an Evolutionary Research Program. Biology and Philosophy 30 (6):873-888.
    Günter Wagner’s Homology, Genes, and Evolutionary Innovation collects and synthesizes a vast array of empirical data, theoretical models, and conceptual analysis to set out a progressive research program with a central theoretical commitment: the genetic theory of homology. This research program diverges from standard approaches in evolutionary biology, provides sharpened contours to explanations of the origin of novelty, and expands the conceptual repertoire of evolutionary developmental biology. I concentrate on four aspects of the book in this essay review: the genetic (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  26.  91
    Gregory Anderson Love (forthcoming). Book Review: Before God. [REVIEW] Interpretation 60 (3):350-352.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Todd M. Gureckis & Bradley C. Love (2009). Short-Term Gains, Long-Term Pains: How Cues About State Aid Learning in Dynamic Environments. Cognition 113 (3):293-313.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  28.  5
    Alan C. Love & Michael Travisano (2013). Microbes Modeling Ontogeny. Biology and Philosophy 28 (2):161-188.
    Model organisms are central to contemporary biology and studies of embryogenesis in particular. Biologists utilize only a small number of species to experimentally elucidate the phenomena and mechanisms of development. Critics have questioned whether these experimental models are good representatives of their targets because of the inherent biases involved in their selection (e.g., rapid development and short generation time). A standard response is that the manipulative molecular techniques available for experimental analysis mitigate, if not counterbalance, this concern. But the most (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  29.  17
    Bradley C. Love & Marc T. Tomlinson (2011). When Learning to Classify by Relations is Easier Than by Features. Thinking and Reasoning 16 (4):372-401.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  30.  27
    Alan C. Love (2012). Formal and Material Theories in Philosophy of Science: A Methodological Interpretation. In Henk W. de Regt (ed.), Epsa Philosophy of Science: Amsterdam 2009. Springer 175--185.
    John Norton’s argument that all formal theories of induction fail raises substantive questions about the philosophical analysis of scientific reasoning. What are the criteria of adequacy for philosophical theories of induction, explanation, or theory structure? Is more than one adequate theory possible? Using a generalized version of Norton’s argument, I demonstrate that the competition between formal and material theories in philosophy of science results from adhering to different criteria of adequacy. This situation encourages an interpretation of “ (...)” and “material” as indicators of divergent criteria that accompany different philosophical methodologies. I characterize another criterion of adequacy associated with material theories, the avoidance of imported problems, and conclude that one way to negotiate between conflicting criteria is to adopt a pluralist stance toward philosophical theories of scientific reasoning. (shrink)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31.  42
    Colin Klein & Gabriel Love (2007). Kicking the Kohler Habit. Philosophical Psychology 20 (5):609 – 619.
    Kohler's experiments with inverting goggles are often thought to support enactivism by showing that visual re-inversion occurs simultaneous with the return of sensorimotor skill. Closer examination reveals that Kohler's work does not show this. Recent work by Linden et al. shows that re-inversion, if it occurs at all, does not occur when the enactivist predicts. As such, the empirical evidence weighs against enactivism.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  32.  4
    Kevin Love (2008). Higher Education, Pedagogy and the 'Customerisation' of Teaching and Learning. Journal of Philosophy of Education 42 (1):15-34.
    It is well documented that the application of business models to the higher education sector has precipitated a managerialistic approach to organisational structures ( Preston, 2001 ). Less well documented is the impact of this business ideal on the student-teacher encounter. It is argued that this age-old relation is now being configured (conceptually and organisationally) in terms peculiar to the business sector: as a customer-product relation. It is the applicability and suitability of such a configuration that specifically concerns this contribution. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  33.  9
    Todd M. Gureckis & Bradley C. Love (2010). Direct Associations or Internal Transformations? Exploring the Mechanisms Underlying Sequential Learning Behavior. Cognitive Science 34 (1):10-50.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34.  3
    Stefan Caris Love (2016). The Jazz Solo as Virtuous Act. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 74 (1):61-74.
    This article presents a new aesthetic of the improvised jazz solo, an aesthetic grounded in the premise that a solo is an act indivisible from the actor and the context. The solo's context includes the local and large-scale conventions of jazz performance as well as the soloist's other work. The theme on which a solo is based serves not as a “work,” but as part of the solo's stylistic context. Knowledge of this context inheres directly into proper apprehension of the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  17
    Alan C. Love (2003). Evolvability, Dispositions, and Intrinsicality. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1015-1027.
    In this paper I examine a dispositional property that has been receiving increased attention in biology, evolvability. First, I identify three compatible but distinct investigative approaches, distinguish two interpretations of evolvability, and treat the difference between dispositions of individuals versus populations. Second, I explore the relevance of philosophical distinctions about dispositions for evolvability, isolating the assumption that dispositions are intrinsically located. I conclude that some instances of evolvability cannot be understood as purely intrinsic to populations and suggest alternative strategies for (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  36. Nathaniel J. Blanco, A. Ross Otto, W. Todd Maddox, Christopher G. Beevers & Bradley C. Love (2013). The Influence of Depression Symptoms on Exploratory Decision-Making. Cognition 129 (3):563-568.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  37.  13
    Bradley C. Love (2001). Uncovering Analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5 (10):454-455.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38.  10
    Alan Love, Evolutionary Morphology, Innovation, and the Synthesis of Evolution and Development.
    One foundational question in contemporary biology is how to integrate evolution and development. The emerging synthesis (evolutionary developmental biology or ‘evo-devo’) requires a meshing of disciplines, concepts, and explanations (inter alia) that have been developed largely in independence over the past century. The nature of the hoped for synthesis is not wholly agreed upon due to divergent viewpoints resulting from this disciplinary independence and, consequently, the mechanics for accomplishing the task are not clearly specified. This paper utilizes historical investigation for (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  39.  23
    Alan C. Love (2003). Evolvability, Dispositions, and Intrinsicality. Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1015-1027.
    In this paper I examine a dispositional property that has been receiving increased attention in biology, evolvability. First, I identify three compatible but distinct investigative approaches, distinguish two interpretations of evolvability, and treat the difference between dispositions of individuals versus populations. Second, I explore the relevance of philosophical distinctions about dispositions for evolvability, isolating the assumption that dispositions are intrinsically located. In conclusion, I argue that some instances of evolvability cannot be understood as purely intrinsic to populations and suggest alternative (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  40.  9
    Alfred Allan & A. Love (eds.) (2010). Ethical Practice in Psychology: Reflections From the Creators of the Aps Code of Ethics. John Wiley.
    Close-up insights on how experts in the field are re-interpreting ethical principles to create workable policies for today and tomorrow, from the creators of ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  41.  21
    R. Clayton Trotter, Susan G. Day & Amy E. Love (1989). Bhopal, India and Union Carbide: The Second Tragedy. [REVIEW] Journal of Business Ethics 8 (6):439-454.
    The paper examines the legal, ethical, and public policy issues involved in the Union Carbide gas leak in India which caused the deaths of over 3000 people and injury to thousands of people. The paper begins with a historical perspective on the operating environment in Bhopal, the events surrounding the accident, then discusses an international situation audit examining internal strengths and weaknesses, and external opportunities and threats faced by Union Carbide at the time of the accident. There is a discussion (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  42.  1
    W. Todd Maddox, Bradley C. Love, Brian D. Glass & J. Vincent Filoteo (2008). When More is Less: Feedback Effects in Perceptual Category Learning. Cognition 108 (2):578-589.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  43.  2
    Arlene M. Davis, Michele Rivkin-Fish & Deborah J. Love (2012). Addressing “Difficult Patient” Dilemmas: Possible Alternatives to the Mediation Model. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (5):13-14.
    The American Journal of Bioethics, Volume 12, Issue 5, Page 13-14, May 2012.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  44.  7
    Alan C. Love (2002). Darwin and "Cirripedia" Prior to 1846: Exploring the Origins of the Barnacle Research. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Biology 35 (2):251-289.
    Phillip Sloan has thoroughly documented the importance of Darwin's general invertebrate research program in the period from 1826 to 1836 and demonstrated how it had an impact on his conversion to transformism. Although Darwin later spent eight years of his life investigating barnacles, this period has received less treatment in studies of Darwin and the development of his thought. The most prominent question for the barnacle period that has been attended to is why Darwin "delayed" in publishing his theory of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  45.  15
    Roberta E. Love & Claudius M. Kessler (1995). Focusing in Wason's Selection Task: Content and Instruction Effects. Thinking and Reasoning 1 (2):153 – 182.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  46.  6
    Alan C. Love (2006). Reflections on the Middle Stages of EvoDevo's Ontogeny. Biological Theory 1 (1):94-97.
  47.  20
    Jeff Love & Todd May (2008). From Universality to Inequality. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 12 (2):51-69.
    Alain Badiou argues in “Rancière and Apolitics” that Rancière has appropriated his central idea of equality from Badiou’s own work. We argue that Badiou’s characterisation of Rancière’s project is correct, but that his self-characterisation is mistaken. What Badiou’s ontology of events opens out onto is not necessarily equality, but instead universality. Equality is only one form of universality, but there is nothing in Badiou’s thought that prohibits the (multiple) universality he positsfrom being hierarchical. In the end, then, Badiou’s thought moves (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  48.  24
    Sandra M. Estanek & Patrick G. Love (2003). Critical Thinking and Seamless Learning. Inquiry 23 (1-2):63-68.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  2
    Jeff Love & Todd May (2008). From Universality to Inequality: Badiou’s Critique of Rancière. Symposium: The Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy 12 (2):51-69.
    Alain Badiou argues in “Rancière and Apolitics” that Rancière has appropriated his central idea of equality from Badiou’s own work. We argue that Badiou’s characterisation of Rancière’s project is correct, but that his self-characterisation is mistaken. What Badiou’s ontology of events opens out onto is not necessarily equality, but instead universality. Equality is only one form of universality, but there is nothing in Badiou’s thought that prohibits the universality he positsfrom being hierarchical. In the end, then, Badiou’s thought moves in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  50.  3
    Janet K. Kern, David A. Geier, Richard C. Deth, Lisa K. Sykes, Brian S. Hooker, James M. Love, Geir Bjørklund, Carmen G. Chaigneau, Boyd E. Haley & Mark R. Geier (forthcoming). Systematic Assessment of Research on Autism Spectrum Disorder and Mercury Reveals Conflicts of Interest and the Need for Transparency in Autism Research. Science and Engineering Ethics:1-30.
    Historically, entities with a vested interest in a product that critics have suggested is harmful have consistently used research to back their claims that the product is safe. Prominent examples are: tobacco, lead, bisphenol A, and atrazine. Research literature indicates that about 80–90 % of studies with industry affiliation found no harm from the product, while only about 10–20 % of studies without industry affiliation found no harm. In parallel to other historical debates, recent studies examining a possible relationship between (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 165