Search results for 'method of the Critique of Pure Reason' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1.  6
    Of Reason (2011). Section I Phenomenology of Life in the Critique of Reason. Analecta Husserliana: Phenomenology/Ontopoiesis Retrieving Geo-Cosmic Horizons of Antiquity: Logos and Life 110:14.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2. Melissa McBay Merritt (2006). Science and the Synthetic Method of the Critique of Pure Reason. Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):517-539.
    Kant maintains that his Critique of Pure Reason follows a “synthetic method” which he distinguishes from the analytic method of the Prolegomena by saying that the Critique “rests on no other science” and “takes nothing as given except reason itself”. The paper presents an account of the synthetic method of the Critique, showing how it is related to Kant’s conception of the Critique as the “science of an a priori judging (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. Melissa Mcbay Merritt (2007). Analysis in the Critique of Pure Reason. Kantian Review 12 (1):61-89.
    The paper argues that existing interpretations of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as an "analysis of experience" (e.g., those of Kitcher and Strawson) fail because they do not properly appreciate the method of the work. The author argues that the Critique provides an analysis of the faculty of reason, and counts as an analysis of experience only in a derivative sense.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  61
    Edward Willatt, Understanding Kant’s Architectonic Method in the Critique of Pure Reason and its Role in the Work of Gilles Deleuze.
    How we read Kant's Critique of Pure Reason has a huge influence on how convincing we find the parts of which it is composed. This thesis will argue that by taking its arguments and concepts in isolation we neglect the unifying architectonic method that Kant employed. Understanding this text as a response to a single problem, that of the possibility of synthetic a priori judgement, will allow us to evaluate it more fully. We will explore Kant's (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5.  35
    Gabriele Gava (2015). Kant's Synthetic and Analytic Method in the Critique of Pure Reason and the Distinction Between Philosophical and Mathematical Syntheses. European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):728-749.
    This article addresses Kant's distinction between a synthetic and an analytic method in philosophy. I will first consider how some commentators have accounted for Kant's distinction and analyze some passages in which Kant defined the analytic and the synthetic method. I will suggest that confusion about Kant's distinction arises because he uses it in at least two different senses. I will then identify a specific way in which Kant accounts for this distinction when he is differentiating between mathematical (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6. Konstantin Pollok (2010). The 'Transcendental Method': On the Reception of the Critique of Pure Reason in Neo-Kantianism. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press
  7. Stefano Bacin (2010). The Meaning of the Critique of Practical Reason for Moral Beings: The Doctrine of Method of Pure Practical Reason. In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8.  1
    Werner Beierwaltes (1974). Transcendental Dialectic. A Commentary on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Part IV: The Doctrine of Method. [REVIEW] Philosophy and History 7 (1):15-16.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  9.  10
    Norman Kemp Smith (1915). Kant's Method of Composing the Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophical Review 24 (5):526-532.
  10. Miguel Alejandro Herszenbaun (2016). Illustrated Shades on the Critique of Pure Reason The Kantian Strategy Regarding the Problem of the German Enlightenment. Ideas Y Valores 65 (161):23-42.
    Se busca precisar cómo la Crítica de la razón pura responde al problema fundamental del Iluminismo alemán: la articulación entre la autoridad de la razón y la fe. Kant busca rescatar las intenciones del racionalista dogmático -compatibilizar la fe y la razón-, pero rechaza el racionalismo y su método. La "Antinomia de la razón pura" y la "Disciplina de la razón pura" llevan a cabo esta estrategia: la primera evidencia que el racionalismo no puede fundamentar la fe por medio de (...)
    No categories
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  11.  12
    Jean Grondin (1993). The Conclusion of the Critique of Pure Reason. Graduate Faculty Philosophy Journal 16 (1):165-178.
    Based on some interpretations about the Critique of Pure Reason, the author holds a real answer to the question about the possibility of Metaphysics remains in the uncertainty there. Without any proper Conclusion of the work, this question is displaced to the background and it is, in certain way, superseded by the question about God's existence and a future life. In II, The Transcendental Doctrine of Method, Kant points towards the Highest Good as a determining ground (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  5
    Gary Hatfield (2001). The Prolegomena and the Critiques of Pure Reason. In Volker Gerhardt, Rolf-Peter Horstmann & Ralph Schumacher (eds.), Kant Und Die Berliner Aufklärung: Akten des IX Internationalen Kant-Kongresses. Walter de Gruyter 185-208.
    This chapter considers Kant's relation to Hume as Kant himself understood it when he wrote the Critique of Pure Reason and the Prolegomena. It first seeks to refine the question of Kant's relation to Hume's skepticism, and it then considers the evidence for Kant's attitude toward Hume in three works: the A Critique, Prolegomena, and B Critique. It argues that in the A Critique Kant viewed skepticism positively, as a necessary reaction to dogmatism and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  13.  49
    Rogério Passos Severo (2007). A Puzzle About Incongruent Counterparts and the Critique of Pure Reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):507–521.
    Kant uses incongruent counterparts in his work before and after 1781, but not in the first Critique. Given the relevance that incongruent counterparts had for his thought on space, and their persistence in his work during the 1780s, it is plausible to think that he had a reason for leaving them out of both editions of the Critique. Two implausible conjectures for their absence are here considered and rejected. A more plausible alternative is put forth, which explains (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  14.  5
    Gary Hatfield (ed.) (2004). Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections From the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
    This new, revised edition of Kant's Prolegomena, the best introduction to the theoretical side of his philosophy, presents his thought clearly through careful attention to his original language. Also included are selections from the Critique of Pure Reason, which fill out and explicate some of Kant's central arguments (including famous sections of the Schematism and Analogies), and in which Kant himself explains his special terminology. The first reviews of the Critique, to which Kant responded in the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15. Christian Onof & Dennis Schulting (2015). Space as Form of Intuition and as Formal Intuition: On the Note to B160 in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophical Review 124 (1):1-58.
    In his argument for the possibility of knowledge of spatial objects, in the Transcendental Deduction of the B-version of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant makes a crucial distinction between space as “form of intuition” and space as “formal intuition.” The traditional interpretation regards the distinction between the two notions as reflecting a distinction between indeterminate space and determinations of space by the understanding, respectively. By contrast, a recent influential reading has argued that the two notions can (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  16. Sebastian Gardner (1999). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. Routledge.
    Kant's The Critique of Pure Reason is arguably the single most important philosophical work in Western philosophy. It is also one of the most difficult philosophical texts to study. This clear, straightforward guide to the Critique recasts Kant's thought in more familiar language, avoiding the technicalities that plague other secondary sources on Kant. Sebastian Gardner examines Kant's thought by contrasting two interpretive traditions--those of Strawson and Allison--while setting the Critique in the context of both pre-Kantian (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  17.  31
    Jay F. Rosenberg (2005). Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford University Press.
    Jay Rosenberg introduces Immanuel Kant's masterwork, the Critique of Pure Reason, from a "relaxed" problem-oriented perspective which treats Kant as an especially insightful practicing philosopher, from whom we still have much to learn, intelligently and creatively responding to significant questions that transcend his work's historical setting. Rosenberg's main project is to command a clear view of how Kant understands various perennial problems, how he attempts to resolve them, and to what extent he succeeds. At the same time (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  18.  32
    Eric Entrican Wilson (2008). Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 649-650.
    In the Preface to his impressive and engaging new commentary on the Critique of Pure Reason, Jay Rosenberg informs us that the book is both a product of his own lectures and a “direct descendent of Wilfrid Sellars’ legendary introduction to Kant” . Its origins in the classroom give Accessing Kant a refreshingly pedagogical tone. Throughout, Rosen-berg—who was a student of Sellars’ at the University of Pittsburgh—makes felicitous use of clear examples, familiar problems and authors, and visual (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. Kenneth R. Westphal (2010). The Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press
    This paper critically examines three key works of analytic Kantianism: C. I. Lewis, Mind and the World Order (1929), P. F. Strawson, The Bounds of Sense (1966) and Wilfrid Sellars, Science and Metaphysics (1968), focusing on their very different approaches to Kant’s Transcendental Deduction.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Aaron M. Griffith (2012). Perception and the Categories: A Conceptualist Reading of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):193-222.
    Abstract: Philosophers interested in Kant's relevance to contemporary debates over the nature of mental content—notably Robert Hanna and Lucy Allais—have argued that Kant ought to be credited with being the original proponent of the existence of ‘nonconceptual content’. However, I think the ‘nonconceptualist’ interpretations that Hanna and Allais give do not show that Kant allowed for nonconceptual content as they construe it. I argue, on the basis of an analysis of certain sections of the A and B editions of the (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  21. Immanuel Kant (2004). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science: With Two Early Reviews of the Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford University Press.
    This accessible and practical edition of Kant's best introduction to his own work is designed especially for students. Assuming no prior knowledge of the Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, esteemed scholar Gunter Zoller provides an extensive introduction that covers Kant's life, the origin and reception of the Prolegomena, the organization of the work, its principal arguments, and its philosophical significance. Detailed notes, a chronology, a glossary, an annotated bibliography, and two reviews of the Critique of Pure Reason--which (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  22.  9
    Graham Bird (1966). Kant's Theory of Knowledge: An Outline of One Central Argument in the Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophical Review 75 (1):113-116.
    First published in 1962. Kant’s philosophical works, and especially the _Critique of Pure Reason_, have had some influence on recent British philosophy. But the complexities of Kant’s arguments, and the unfamiliarity of his vocabulary, inhibit understanding of his point of view. In _Kant’s Theory of Knowledge _an attempt is made to relate Kant’s arguments in the _Critique of Pure Reason _to contemporary issues by expressing them in a more modern idiom. The selection of issues discussed is intended (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  23. Robert Sears (1999). Kant's Leibniz-Critique in the Amphiboly Chapter of the "Critique of Pure Reason". Dissertation, University of Ottawa (Canada)
    In this dissertation it is argued that Kant's critique of Leibniz as found in the amphiboly chapter of the Critique of Pure Reason derives from his theory of reflection. It is argued further that this unfocused and fragmentary amphiboly chapter, which contains the Leibniz-critique, can be seen to have a previously unsuspected unity to it. The keys to perceiving this unity are the appendix's purpose, structure and mosaic composition. ;The primary purpose of the appendix is (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  3
    Immanuel Kant (2004). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections From the Critique of Pure Reason, Ed. By Gary Hatfield, 2nd Edition. Cambrdge University Press.
    This new, revised edition of Kant's Prolegomena, the best introduction to the theoretical side of his philosophy, presents his thought clearly through careful attention to his original language. Also included are selections from the Critique of Pure Reason, which fill out and explicate some of Kant's central arguments (including famous sections of the Schematism and Analogies), and in which Kant himself explains his special terminology. The first reviews of the Critique, to which Kant responded in the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  25.  32
    Lawrence Pasternack (2001). The Ens Realissimum and Necessary Being in the Critique of Pure Reason. Religious Studies 37 (4):467-474.
    Just prior to The Critique of Pure Reason's examination of the various arguments for God's existence, Kant discusses the conceptual relationship between the idea of an ens realissimum and that of a necessary being. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the extent to which this discussion informs his claim that the cosmological argument depends upon the ontological argument.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  11
    Francisco Iracheta Fernández (2012). Practical and Transcendental Freedom in the Critique of Pure Reason. Ideas Y Valores 61 (150):91-125.
    Se problematiza la conexión entre la libertad práctica y trascendental en la Crítica de la razón pura. La intención es explicitar las dificultades que enfrenta Kant al relacionar estos sentidos de libertad dentro del marco de la filosofía crítica. Por lo general, los intérpretes entienden la relación entre estos dos sentidos de libertad como ontológica o como conceptual. Se quiere mostrar que ninguna de estas interpretaciones alcanza a superar los presuntos dogmatismos racionalista y empirista que, en conformidad con Kant, sustentan (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  8
    Guenter Zoeller (1993). Main Developments in Recent Scholarship on the Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (2):445-466.
    The paper is a critical discussion of scholarship on the "Critique of Pure Reason" published during the past ten years. The emphasis is on Anglo-American authors. I identify and discuss three main trends in the field: a shift from the general discussion of transcendental arguments to the analysis and evaluation of particular proofs in Kant; a renewed interest in the doctrine of transcendental idealism and the distinction between things in themselves and appearances; and the emergence of an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Graham Bird (2016). Kant's Theory of Knowledge: An Outline of One Central Argument in the 'Critique of Pure Reason'. Routledge.
    First published in 1962. Kant’s philosophical works, and especially the _Critique of Pure Reason_, have had some influence on recent British philosophy. But the complexities of Kant’s arguments, and the unfamiliarity of his vocabulary, inhibit understanding of his point of view. In _Kant’s Theory of Knowledge _an attempt is made to relate Kant’s arguments in the _Critique of Pure Reason _to contemporary issues by expressing them in a more modern idiom. The selection of issues discussed is intended (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Jay F. Rosenberg (2005). Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford University Press Uk.
    Jay Rosenberg introduces Immanuel Kant's masterwork, the Critique of Pure Reason, from a 'relaxed' problem-oriented perspective which treats Kant as an especially insightful practising philosopher, from whom we still have much to learn, intelligently and creatively responding to significant questions that transcend his work's historical setting. Rosenberg's main project is to command a clear view of how Kant understands various perennial problems, how he attempts to resolve them, and to what extent he succeeds. The constructive portions of (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Anthony Savile (2005). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Orientation to the Central Theme. Wiley-Blackwell.
    This fresh orientation to Kant's _Critique of Pure Reason_ presents his central theme, the development of his Transcendental Idealism, as a ground-breaking response to perceived weaknesses in his predecessors' accounts of experiential knowledge. Traces the central theme of the Critique, the development of Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Offers new and original readings of the central arguments in both the Transcendental Aesthetic and the Transcendental Analytic. Appraises the success and failure of Kant's project in the _Critique_.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  31. Daniel Dahlstrom (2010). The Critique of Pure Reason and Continental Philosophy: Heidegger's Interpretation of Transcendental Imagination. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press
  32. Sebastian Gardner (2003). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. Routledge.
    Kant's _Critique of Pure Reason_ is arguably the single most important work in western philosophy. The book introduces and assesses: * Kant's life and background of the _Critique of Pure Reason_ * the ideas and text of the _Critique of Pure Reason_ * the continuing relevance of Kant's work to contemporary philosophy. Ideal for anyone coming to Kant's thought for the first time. This guide will be vital reading for all students of Kant in philosophy.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Kent Baldner (1985). Intentionality and the "Critique of Pure Reason". Dissertation, University of California, Irvine
    My dissertation is concerned with Kant's theory of our experience of objects as presented in his Critique of Pure Reason. I begin by considering two distinct approaches that one can take in analyzing intentional experiences--i.e., experiences of or about things. I note that one may analyze such experiences either in terms of the sorts of things that we can have experience of or in terms of the sorts of experiences that we can have of things. It is (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  34.  69
    Paul Guyer (ed.) (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
    Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, first published in 1781, is one of the landmarks of Western philosophy, a radical departure from everything that went before and an inescapable influence on all philosophy since its publication. This Companion is the first collective commentary on this work in English. The seventeen chapters have been written by an international team of scholars, including some of the best-known figures in the field as well as emerging younger talents. The first two (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35. Gary Hatfield (ed.) (2004). Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections From the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
    Kant is the central figure of modern philosophy. He sought to rebuild philosophy from the ground up, and he succeeded in permanently changing its problems and methods. This revised edition of the Prolegomena, which is the best introduction to the theoretical side of his philosophy, presents his thought clearly by paying careful attention to his original language. Also included are selections from the Critique of Pure Reason, which fill out and explicate some of Kant's central arguments, and (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Gary Hatfield (ed.) (2012). Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: With Selections From the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
    Kant is the central figure of modern philosophy. He sought to rebuild philosophy from the ground up, and he succeeded in permanently changing its problems and methods. This new translation of the Prolegomena, which is the best introduction to his philosophy, presents his thought clearly by paying careful attention to his original language. Also included are selections from the Critique of Pure Reason, which fill out and explicate some of Kant's central arguments, and in which Kant himself (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  37. Anthony Savile (2005). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Orientation to the Central Theme. Wiley-Blackwell.
    This fresh orientation to Kant's _Critique of Pure Reason_ presents his central theme, the development of his Transcendental Idealism, as a ground-breaking response to perceived weaknesses in his predecessors' accounts of experiential knowledge. Traces the central theme of the Critique, the development of Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Offers new and original readings of the central arguments in both the Transcendental Aesthetic and the Transcendental Analytic. Appraises the success and failure of Kant's project in the _Critique_.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  38. Paul Guyer (ed.) (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
    Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, first published in 1781, is one of the landmarks of Western philosophy, a radical departure from everything that went before and an inescapable influence on all philosophy since its publication. This Companion is the first collective commentary on this work in English. The seventeen chapters have been written by an international team of scholars, including some of the best-known figures in the field as well as emerging younger talents. The first two (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Anthony Savile (2008). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Orientation to the Central Theme. Wiley-Blackwell.
    This fresh orientation to Kant's _Critique of Pure Reason_ presents his central theme, the development of his Transcendental Idealism, as a ground-breaking response to perceived weaknesses in his predecessors' accounts of experiential knowledge. Traces the central theme of the Critique, the development of Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Offers new and original readings of the central arguments in both the Transcendental Aesthetic and the Transcendental Analytic. Appraises the success and failure of Kant's project in the _Critique_.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Anthony Savile (2008). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Orientation to the Central Theme. Wiley-Blackwell.
    This fresh orientation to Kant's _Critique of Pure Reason_ presents his central theme, the development of his Transcendental Idealism, as a ground-breaking response to perceived weaknesses in his predecessors' accounts of experiential knowledge. Traces the central theme of the Critique, the development of Kant's Transcendental Idealism. Offers new and original readings of the central arguments in both the Transcendental Aesthetic and the Transcendental Analytic. Appraises the success and failure of Kant's project in the _Critique_.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41.  43
    Murray Miles (2006). Kant's 'Copernican Revolution': Toward Rehabilitation of a Concept and Provision of a Framework for the Interpretation of the Critique of Pure Reason. Kant-Studien 97 (1):1-32.
    1. Introductory It is a commonplace by now that the expressions ‘Copernican revolution’ and ‘the Copernican hypothesis’ do not actually occur in that portion of the preface to the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason that contains the only references to Copernicus to be found in the Kantian corpus. Kant speaks rather of “der erste Gedanke des Copernicus” – literally, “the original idea” or “the initial thought” of Copernicus. Still, the word ‘revolution’ occurs no fewer (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42.  17
    Brent Adkins (1999). The Satisfaction of Reason: The Mathematical/Dynamical Distinction in the Critique of Pure Reason. Kantian Review 3 (1):64-80.
    In the preface to the second edition of the Critique of Pure Reason Kant explicitly states that his motivation for writing this work is to make room for faith or the practical employment of reason . How does Kant accomplish this? The topics of God and the immortality of the soul do not arise until the conclusion of the antinomies. How does Kant get from the desire to make room for faith to its fulfilment in the (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  14
    J. D. G. Evans (1999). Kant's Analysis of the Paralogism of Rational Psychology in Critique of Pure Reason Edition B. Kantian Review 3 (1):99-105.
    One third of the transcendental dialectic in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason is devoted to demolishing the pseudo-science of rational psychology. In this part of his work Kant attacks the idea that there is an ultimate subject of experience — the ‘I’ or Self — which can only be investigated and understood intellectually. The belief that such a study is possible is natural to human reason; but it is based on demonstrable error. Kant tries to exorcize (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  65
    Houston Smit (1999). The Role of Reflection in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):203–223.
    There are two prevailing interpretations of the status which Kant accorded his claims in the Critique of Pure Reason: 1) he is analyzing our concepts of cognition and experience; 2) he is making empirical claims about our cognitive faculties. I argue for a third alternative: on Kant's account, all cognition consists in a reflective consciousness of our cognitive faculties, and in critique we analyze the content of this consciousness. Since Strawson raises a famous charge of incoherence (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  45.  20
    Desmond Bell, Studies in the Dissolution of Classical Epistemology : The Role of Philosophical Critique in an Age of Sociological Reason and Historical Method.
    What is the relation between philosophical analysis and sociological method? Sociology has traditionally looked to Philosophy to provide either an indubitable epistemic foundation for its practices or alternatively to legislate invariant criteria of scientificity which might guide the social sciences in questions of methodology. But has Philosophy itself such an autonomy from the developing knowledge domains of the different sciences,natural and social? A structural analysis of philosophic discourse in the twentieth century reveals as a key element of recent philosophic'al (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Dennis J. Sweet (1989). Objective Knowledge and Self-Consciousness: The Role of Kant's Theory of Apperceptive Self-Identity in the "Critique of Pure Reason". Dissertation, The University of Iowa
    Kant's purpose in the Critique of Pure Reason was to describe the nature and set the boundaries of human knowledge. At the heart of this ambitious enterprise is his doctrine of apperceptive self-identity. He insists that in order for us to know anything, there must be a unitary self capable of being aware of its own identity over time. Unfortunately, Kant's descriptions of this unitary 'I think' are extremely obscure, and his accounts of how it functions in (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Rolf-Peter Horstmann (2010). The Reception of the Critique of Pure Reason in German Idealism. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Charles Nussbaum (1988). The Manifold of Intuition and the Form-Matter Distinction in Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason". Dissertation, Emory University
    Kant is the last classical practitioner of foundationalist epistemology in the Cartesian tradition, a tradition which saw the major problem of the theory of knowledge as one of providing a metaphysical account of the way in which the subjective contents of the individual mind come to have indubitable objective reference. But he is also the inaugurator of a very different approach to epistemology, one that sees methodology or rules of cognitive procedure as fundamental in determining the objectivity of knowledge. An (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  7
    Sofie C. Møller (2013). The Court of Reason in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Kant-Studien 104 (3):301-320.
    : The aim of the present paper is to discuss how the legal metaphors in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason can help us understand the work’s transcendental argumentation. I discuss Dieter Henrich’s claim that legal deductions form a methodological paradigm for all three Critiques that exempts the deductions from following a stringent logical structure. I also consider Rüdiger Bubner’s proposal that the legal metaphors show that the transcendental deduction is a rhetorical argument. On the basis of my (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Bryan Hall (2010). The Arguments of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Lexington Books.
    This book reconstructs, using the tools of propositional logic, thirty-six of the central arguments from Immanuel Kant's landmark work, the Critique of Pure Reason. Although there are many excellent companions to and commentaries on the Critique, none of these books straightforwardly reconstructs so many of Kant's arguments premise by premise, using the tools of propositional logic.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000