Search results for 'method of the Critique of Pure Reason' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Of Reason (2011). Section I Phenomenology of Life in the Critique of Reason. Analecta Husserliana: Phenomenology/Ontopoiesis Retrieving Geo-Cosmic Horizons of Antiquity: Logos and Life 110:14.score: 6620.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Melissa McBay Merritt (2006). Science and the Synthetic Method of the Critique of Pure Reason. Review of Metaphysics 59 (3):517-539.score: 3573.0
    Kant maintains that his Critique of Pure Reason follows a “synthetic method” which he distinguishes from the analytic method of the Prolegomena by saying that the Critique “rests on no other science” and “takes nothing as given except reason itself”. The paper presents an account of the synthetic method of the Critique, showing how it is related to Kant’s conception of the Critique as the “science of an a priori judging (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Melissa Mcbay Merritt (2007). Analysis in the Critique of Pure Reason. Kantian Review 12 (1):61-89.score: 3375.0
    The paper argues that existing interpretations of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason as an "analysis of experience" (e.g., those of Kitcher and Strawson) fail because they do not properly appreciate the method of the work. The author argues that the Critique provides an analysis of the faculty of reason, and counts as an analysis of experience only in a derivative sense.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Gabriele Gava (2013). Kant's Synthetic and Analytic Method in the Critique of Pure Reason and the Distinction Between Philosophical and Mathematical Syntheses. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (2):n/a-n/a.score: 2664.0
    This article addresses Kant's distinction between a synthetic and an analytic method in philosophy. I will first consider how some commentators have accounted for Kant's distinction and analyze some passages in which Kant defined the analytic and the synthetic method. I will suggest that confusion about Kant's distinction arises because he uses it in at least two different senses. I will then identify a specific way in which Kant accounts for this distinction when he is differentiating between mathematical (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Konstantin Pollok (2010). The 'Transcendental Method': On the Reception of the Critique of Pure Reason in Neo-Kantianism. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.score: 2421.0
  6. Stefano Bacin (2010). The Meaning of the Critique of Practical Reason for Moral Beings: The Doctrine of Method of Pure Practical Reason. In Andrews Reath & Jens Timmermann (eds.), Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide. Cambridge University Press.score: 2124.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Norman Kemp Smith (1915). Kant's Method of Composing the Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophical Review 24 (5):526-532.score: 1962.0
  8. Rogério Passos Severo (2007). A Puzzle About Incongruent Counterparts and the Critique of Pure Reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 88 (4):507–521.score: 1845.0
    Kant uses incongruent counterparts in his work before and after 1781, but not in the first Critique. Given the relevance that incongruent counterparts had for his thought on space, and their persistence in his work during the 1780s, it is plausible to think that he had a reason for leaving them out of both editions of the Critique. Two implausible conjectures for their absence are here considered and rejected. A more plausible alternative is put forth, which explains (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Sebastian Gardner (1999). Routledge Philosophy Guidebook to Kant and the Critique of Pure Reason. Routledge.score: 1657.5
    Kant's The Critique of Pure Reason is arguably the single most important philosophical work in Western philosophy. It is also one of the most difficult philosophical texts to study. This clear, straightforward guide to the Critique recasts Kant's thought in more familiar language, avoiding the technicalities that plague other secondary sources on Kant. Sebastian Gardner examines Kant's thought by contrasting two interpretive traditions--those of Strawson and Allison--while setting the Critique in the context of both pre-Kantian (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. James R. O'Shea (2012). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction and Interpretation. Acumen.score: 1605.0
    Immanuel Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason (1781) remains a landmark work of philosophy and one that most students will encounter at some point in their studies. At nearly seven hundred pages of detailed and complex argument it is a demanding and intimidating read. James O’Shea’s introduction to the Critique seeks to make it less so. Aimed primarily at students coming to the book for the first time, it provides step-by-step analysis in clear, unambiguous prose. The conceptual (...)
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Kenneth R. Westphal (2010). The Critique of Pure Reason and Analytic Philosophy. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.score: 1597.5
    This paper critically examines three key works of analytic Kantianism: C. I. Lewis, Mind and the World Order (1929), P. F. Strawson, The Bounds of Sense (1966) and Wilfrid Sellars, Science and Metaphysics (1968), focusing on their very different approaches to Kant’s Transcendental Deduction.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Immanuel Kant (2004). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Present Itself as a Science: With Two Early Reviews of the Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford University Press.score: 1575.0
    This accessible and practical edition of Kant's best introduction to his own work is designed especially for students. Assuming no prior knowledge of the Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics, esteemed scholar Gunter Zoller provides an extensive introduction that covers Kant's life, the origin and reception of the Prolegomena, the organization of the work, its principal arguments, and its philosophical significance. Detailed notes, a chronology, a glossary, an annotated bibliography, and two reviews of the Critique of Pure Reason--which (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Jay F. Rosenberg (2005). Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason. Oxford University Press.score: 1567.5
    Jay Rosenberg introduces Immanuel Kant's masterwork, the Critique of Pure Reason, from a "relaxed" problem-oriented perspective which treats Kant as an especially insightful practicing philosopher, from whom we still have much to learn, intelligently and creatively responding to significant questions that transcend his work's historical setting. Rosenberg's main project is to command a clear view of how Kant understands various perennial problems, how he attempts to resolve them, and to what extent he succeeds. At the same time (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Immanuel Kant (2004). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections From the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.score: 1567.5
    This new, revised edition of Kant's Prolegomena, the best introduction to the theoretical side of his philosophy, presents his thought clearly through careful attention to his original language. Also included are selections from the Critique of Pure Reason, which fill out and explicate some of Kant's central arguments (including famous sections of the Schematism and Analogies), and in which Kant himself explains his special terminology. The first reviews of the Critique, to which Kant responded in the (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Brian Chance (2014). Kant and the Discipline of Reason. European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4).score: 1563.0
    Kant's notion of ‘discipline’ has received considerable attention from scholars of his philosophy of education, but its role in his theoretical philosophy has been largely ignored. This omission is surprising since his discussion of discipline in the first Critique is not only more extensive and expansive in scope than his other discussions but also predates them. The goal of this essay is to provide a comprehensive reading of the Discipline that emphasizes its systematic importance in the first Critique. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Dennis Schulting & Christian Onof (forthcoming). Space as Form of Intuition and as Formal Intuition. On the Note to B160 in Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophical Review 124 (1).score: 1560.0
    In his argument for the possibility of knowledge of spatial objects, in the Transcendental Deduction of the B-version of the Critique of Pure Reason, Kant makes a crucial distinction between space as ‘form of intuition’ and space as ‘formal intuition.’ The traditional interpretation regards the distinction between the two notions as reflecting a distinction between indeterminate space and determinations of space by the understanding respectively. By contrast, a recent influential reading has argued that the two notions can (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Aaron M. Griffith (2012). Perception and the Categories: A Conceptualist Reading of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. European Journal of Philosophy 20 (2):193-222.score: 1545.0
    Abstract: Philosophers interested in Kant's relevance to contemporary debates over the nature of mental content—notably Robert Hanna and Lucy Allais—have argued that Kant ought to be credited with being the original proponent of the existence of ‘nonconceptual content’. However, I think the ‘nonconceptualist’ interpretations that Hanna and Allais give do not show that Kant allowed for nonconceptual content as they construe it. I argue, on the basis of an analysis of certain sections of the A and B editions of the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Lawrence Pasternack (2001). The Ens Realissimum and Necessary Being in the Critique of Pure Reason. Religious Studies 37 (4):467-474.score: 1537.5
    Just prior to The Critique of Pure Reason's examination of the various arguments for God's existence, Kant discusses the conceptual relationship between the idea of an ens realissimum and that of a necessary being. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate the extent to which this discussion informs his claim that the cosmological argument depends upon the ontological argument.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Francisco Iracheta Fernández (2012). Practical and Transcendental Freedom in the Critique of Pure Reason. Ideas Y Valores 61 (150):91-125.score: 1537.5
    Se problematiza la conexión entre la libertad práctica y trascendental en la Crítica de la razón pura. La intención es explicitar las dificultades que enfrenta Kant al relacionar estos sentidos de libertad dentro del marco de la filosofía crítica. Por lo general, los intérpretes entienden la relación entre estos dos sentidos de libertad como ontológica o como conceptual. Se quiere mostrar que ninguna de estas interpretaciones alcanza a superar los presuntos dogmatismos racionalista y empirista que, en conformidad con Kant, sustentan (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Guenter Zoeller (1993). Main Developments in Recent Scholarship on the Critique of Pure Reason. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 53 (2):445-466.score: 1537.5
    The paper is a critical discussion of scholarship on the "Critique of Pure Reason" published during the past ten years. The emphasis is on Anglo-American authors. I identify and discuss three main trends in the field: a shift from the general discussion of transcendental arguments to the analysis and evaluation of particular proofs in Kant; a renewed interest in the doctrine of transcendental idealism and the distinction between things in themselves and appearances; and the emergence of an (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Daniel Dahlstrom (2010). The Critique of Pure Reason and Continental Philosophy: Heidegger's Interpretation of Transcendental Imagination. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.score: 1537.5
  22. Paul Guyer (ed.) (2010). The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.score: 1530.0
    Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, first published in 1781, is one of the landmarks of Western philosophy, a radical departure from everything that went before and an inescapable influence on all philosophy since its publication. This Companion is the first collective commentary on this work in English. The seventeen chapters have been written by an international team of scholars, including some of the best-known figures in the field as well as emerging younger talents. The first two (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Desmond Bell, Studies in the Dissolution of Classical Epistemology : The Role of Philosophical Critique in an Age of Sociological Reason and Historical Method.score: 1522.5
    What is the relation between philosophical analysis and sociological method? Sociology has traditionally looked to Philosophy to provide either an indubitable epistemic foundation for its practices or alternatively to legislate invariant criteria of scientificity which might guide the social sciences in questions of methodology. But has Philosophy itself such an autonomy from the developing knowledge domains of the different sciences,natural and social? A structural analysis of philosophic discourse in the twentieth century reveals as a key element of recent philosophic'al (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Houston Smit (1999). The Role of Reflection in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 80 (2):203–223.score: 1515.0
    There are two prevailing interpretations of the status which Kant accorded his claims in the Critique of Pure Reason: 1) he is analyzing our concepts of cognition and experience; 2) he is making empirical claims about our cognitive faculties. I argue for a third alternative: on Kant's account, all cognition consists in a reflective consciousness of our cognitive faculties, and in critique we analyze the content of this consciousness. Since Strawson raises a famous charge of incoherence (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Rolf-Peter Horstmann (2010). The Reception of the Critique of Pure Reason in German Idealism. In Paul Guyer (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.score: 1515.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Colin McLear (forthcoming). Two Kinds of Unity in the Critique of Pure Reason. Journal of the History of Philosophy.score: 1392.5
    I argue that Kant’s distinction between the cognitive roles of sensibility and understanding raises a question concerning the conditions necessary for objective representation. I distinguish two opposing interpretive positions—viz. Intellectualism and Sensibilism. According to Intellectualism all objective representation depends, at least in part, on the unifying synthetic activity of the mind. In contrast, Sensibilism argues that at least some forms of objective representation, specifically intuitions, do not require synthesis. I argue that there are deep reasons for thinking that Intellectualism is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Philip Dwyer (2010). Necessity and Possibility: The Logical Strategy of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 48 (3):402-403.score: 1350.0
    This book is a foray into the thorny interpretive issue of what to make of Kant's so-called "Metaphysical Deduction" of the categories. As with many of the arguments in the first Critique, the claim of the Metaphysical Deduction is easier to make out than its argument. The claim is that by some or other reference to "general logic," one may obtain a "transcendental logic," i.e., a justification (or "deduction") of the categories (of the understanding) necessary to the (very) possibility (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. P. F. Strawson (1975). The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Distributed by Harper & Row, Barnes & Noble Import Division.score: 1280.0
  29. H. W. Cassirer (1954/2002). Kant's First Critique: An Appraisal of the Permanent Significance of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Routledge.score: 1275.0
    First published in 2002. Routledge is an imprint of Taylor & Francis, an informa company.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Immanuel Kant (1982). Critique of Pure Reason: Concise Text in a New, Faithful, Terminologically Improved Translation Exhibiting the Structure of Kant's Argument in Thesis and Proof. Scientia.score: 1275.0
  31. Immanuel Kant (2007/1991). Critique of Pure Reason. In Elizabeth Schmidt Radcliffe, Richard McCarty, Fritz Allhoff & Anand Vaidya (eds.), Late Modern Philosophy: Essential Readings with Commentary. Blackwell Pub. Ltd..score: 1245.0
    One of the cornerstone books of Western philosophy, Critique of Pure Reason is Kant's seminal treatise, where he seeks to define the nature of reason itself and builds his own unique system of philosophical thought with an approach known as transcendental idealism. He argues that human knowledge is limited by the capacity for perception and attempts a logical designation of two varieties of knowledge: a posteriori, the knowledge acquired through experience; and a priori, knowledge not derived (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Jill Vance Buroker (2006). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press.score: 1245.0
    In this new introductory textbook to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, Jill Vance Buroker explains the role of this first Critique in Kant's Critical project and offers a line-by-line reading of the major arguments in the text. She situates Kant's views in relation both to his predecessors and to contemporary debates, explaining his Critical philosophy as a response to the failure of rationalism and the challenge of skepticism. Paying special attention to Kant's notoriously difficult vocabulary, she (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Eric Watkins (ed.) (2009). Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: Background Source Materials. Cambridge University Press.score: 1245.0
    Provides English translations of texts that form the essential background to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Kant Immanuel (1998). Critique of Pure Reason ; Translated and Edited by Paul Guyer, Allen W. Wood. Cambridge.score: 1245.0
    This entirely new translation of Critique of Pure Reason by Paul Guyer and Allan Wood is the most accurate and informative English translation ever produced of this epochal philosophical text. Though its simple, direct style will make it suitable for all new readers of Kant, the translation displays a philosophical and textual sophistication that will enlighten Kant scholars as well. This translation recreates as far as possible a text with the same interpretative nuances and richness as the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Michelle Greer (1999). Kant and the Capacity to Judge; Sensibility and Discursivity in the TranscendentaI Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 37 (2):372-374.score: 1230.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Charles J. Rieck (1965). Kant's Theory of Mental Activity, a Commentary on the Transcendental Analytic of the Critique of Pure Reason (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 3 (2):283-284.score: 1230.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Immanuel Kant (2003). Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: With Two Early Reviews of the Critique of Pure Reason. OUP Oxford.score: 1230.0
    Two hundred years after his death, Kant remains one of the most important modern philosophers. The Prolegomena is the ideal introduction to Kant's unique account of the nature human knowledge, according to which we actively shape the world as we know it. -/- This new edition of Kant's own summary of his philosophy is designed specially for students. Guenter Zoeller assumes no prior knowledge of the Prolegomena and provides an extensive and comprehensive introduction which explores Kant's life, the origin and (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Eric Entrican Wilson (2008). Accessing Kant: A Relaxed Introduction to the Critique of Pure Reason (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 649-650.score: 1222.5
  39. Kenneth R. Westphal (1995). Does Kant's Metaphysical Foundations of Natural Science Fill a Gap in the Critique of Pure Reason? Synthese 103 (1):43 - 86.score: 1222.5
    In 1792 and 1798 Kant noticed two basic problems with hisMetaphysical Foundations of Natural Science (MAdN) which opened a crucial gap in the Critical system as a whole. Why is theMAdN so important? I show that the Analogies of Experience form an integrated proof of transeunt causality. This is central to Kant's answer to Hume. This proof requires explicating the empirical concept of matter as the moveable in space, it requires the specifically metaphysical principle that every physical event has an (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Paul Guyer (1984). Review: Pippin, Kant's Theory of Form: An Essay on the Critique of Pure Reason. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 22 (3):377-382.score: 1222.5
  41. Hugo Eduardo Herrera (2010). Salomon Maimon's Commentary on the Subject of the Given in Immanuel Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Review of Metaphysics 63 (3):593-613.score: 1222.5
    The article approaches Salomon Maimon’s reinterpretation of the notions of the thing in itself and the given within the framework of criticism. For Maimon they do not refer to a transcendence that is directly unattainable by knowledge. In this attempt, he tries to explain the given on the basis of the action of constitutive understanding. With this, he triggers the passage from transcendental Kantian philosophy to the idealism of Fichte. Nonetheless, his position faces the subsequent problem of explaining how the (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Richard E. Aquila (1992). The Subject as Appearance and as Thing in Itself in the Critique of Pure Reason: Reflections in the Light of the Role of Imagination and Apprehension. In Phillip D. Cummins & Guenter Zoeller (eds.), Minds, Ideas, and Objects: Essays in the Theory of Representation in Modern Philosophy. Ridgeview Publishing Company.score: 1222.5
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Alfredo Ferrarin (1997). Review of G. Tonelli, Kant's "Critique of Pure Reason" Within the Tradition of Modern Logic. Journal of the History of Philosophy 35 (3):472-474.score: 1215.0
  44. Paul J. J. M. Bakker, Johannes M. M. H. Thijssen, Samantha Frost & Palo Alto (2008). Altman, Matthew C. A Companion to Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2008. Pp. Xviii+ 232. Paper, $30.00. Baker, Lynne Rudder. The Metaphysics of Everyday Life: An Essay in Practical Realism. Cambridge-New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007. Pp. Xv+ 253. Cloth, $85.00. [REVIEW] Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (3):495-98.score: 1215.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Kwang-Sae Lee (1989). Two Interpretations of the Structure of the Mathematical Antinomies of the Critique of Pure Reason. In. In Gerhard Funke & Thomas M. Seebohm (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Kant Congress. Center for Advanced Research in Phenomenology & University Press of America. 11--21.score: 1207.5
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. David W. Tarbet (1968). The Fabric of Metaphor in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. Journal of the History of Philosophy 6 (3):257-270.score: 1200.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Stephen A. Erickson (1969). The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason (Review). Journal of the History of Philosophy 7 (3):335-338.score: 1200.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Béatrice Longuenesse (1998). Kant and the Capacity to Judge: Sensibility and Discursivity in the Transcendental Analytic of the "Critique of Pure Reason&Quot;. Princeton University Press.score: 1185.0
    "Kant and the Capacity to Judge" will prove to be an important and influential event in Kant studies and in philosophy.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Matt McCormick (2005). Kant's Theory of Mind in the Critique of Pure Reason's Subjective Deduction. Journal of Value Inquiry 39 (3):353–381.score: 1177.5
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Mark Fisher & Eric Watkins (1998). Kant on the Material Ground of Possibility: From "The Only Possible Argument" to the "Critique of Pure Reason". Review of Metaphysics 52 (2):369 - 395.score: 1177.5
1 — 50 / 1000