Search results for 'philosophy of neuroscience' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. John Bickle, Pete Mandik & Anthony Landreth, The Philosophy of Neuroscience. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
    Over the past three decades, philosophy of science has grown increasingly “local.” Concerns have switched from general features of scientific practice to concepts, issues, and puzzles specific to particular disciplines. Philosophy of neuroscience is a natural result. This emerging area was also spurred by remarkable recent growth in the neurosciences. Cognitive and computational neuroscience continues to encroach upon issues traditionally addressed within the humanities, including the nature of consciousness, action, knowledge, and normativity. Empirical discoveries about brain (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  2.  79
    Carsten Held, Markus Knauff & Gottfried Vosgerau (eds.) (2006). Mental Models and the Mind: Current Developments in Cognitive Psychology, Neuroscience, and Philosophy of Mind. Elsevier.
    "Cognitive psychology," "cognitive neuroscience," and "philosophy of mind" are names for three very different scientific fields, but they label aspects of the same scientific goal: to understand the nature of mental phenomena. Today, the three disciplines strongly overlap under the roof of the cognitive sciences. The book's purpose is to present views from the different disciplines on one of the central theories in cognitive science: the theory of mental models. Cognitive psychologists report their research on the representation and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  3. A. Goldman (2006/2008). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford University Press.
    People are minded creatures; we have thoughts, feelings and emotions. More intriguingly, we grasp our own mental states, and conduct the business of ascribing them to ourselves and others without instruction in formal psychology. How do we do this? And what are the dimensions of our grasp of the mental realm? In this book, Alvin I. Goldman explores these questions with the tools of philosophy, developmental psychology, social psychology and cognitive neuroscience. He refines an approach called simulation theory, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   183 citations  
  4. Ian Gold & Daniel Stoljar (1999). A Neuron Doctrine in the Philosophy of Neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):809-830.
    It is widely held that a successful theory of the mind will be neuroscientific. In this paper we ask, first, what this claim means, and, secondly, whether it is true. In answer to the first question, we argue that the claim is ambiguous between two views–one plausible but unsubstantive, and one substantive but highly controversial. In answer to the second question, we argue that neither the evidence from neuroscience itself nor from other scientific and philosophical considerations supports the controversial (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  5.  78
    Michel Weber & Anderson Weekes (eds.) (2010). Process Approaches to Consciousness in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Philosophy of Mind. State University of New York Press.
    This collection opens a dialogue between process philosophy and contemporary consciousness studies. Approaching consciousness from diverse disciplinary perspectives—philosophy, psychology, neuroscience, neuropathology, psychotherapy, biology, animal ethology, and physics—the contributors offer empirical and philosophical support for a model of consciousness inspired by the process philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead (1861–1947). Whitehead’s model is developed in ways he could not have anticipated to show how it can advance current debates beyond well-known sticking points. This has trenchant consequences for epistemology (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  6.  32
    Susan Stuart (2009). Alvin I. Goldman, Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Mindreading. [REVIEW] Minds and Machines 19 (2):279-282.
    Alvin I. Goldman, Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Mindreading Content Type Journal Article Pages 279-282 DOI 10.1007/s11023-009-9142-x Authors Susan Stuart, University of Glasgow Humanities Advanced Technology and Information Institute 11 University Gardens Glasgow G12 8QQ Scotland, UK Journal Minds and Machines Online ISSN 1572-8641 Print ISSN 0924-6495 Journal Volume Volume 19 Journal Issue Volume 19, Number 2.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  7.  12
    Juan José Sanguineti (2015). Trends in Philosophy of Mind and Philosophy of Neuroscience. In P. A. Gargiulo H. L. Mesones (ed.), Psychiatry and Neuroscience. Bridging the Divide. Springer 23-37.
    This paper presents current trends in philosophy of mind and philosophy of neuroscience, with a special focus on neuroscientists dealing with some topics usually discussed by philosophers of mind. The aim is to detect the philosophical views of those scientists, such as Eccles, Gazzaniga, Damasio, Changeux, and others, which are not easy to classify according to the standard divisions of dualism, functionalism, emergentism, and others. As the variety of opinions in these fields is sometimes a source of (...)
    Translate
      Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. John Bickle (ed.) (2009). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press.
    The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience is a state-of-the-art collection of interdisciplinary research spanning philosophy (of science, mind, and ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  9. John Bickle (2005). Precis of Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. [REVIEW] Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4 (3):231-238.
    This book precis describes the motives behind my recent attempt to bring to bear “ruthlessly reductive” results from cellular and molecular neuroscience onto issues in the philosophy of mind. Since readers of this journal will probably be most interested in results addressing features of conscious experience, I highlight these most prominently. My main challenge is that philosophers (even scientifically-inspired ones) are missing the nature and scope of reductionism in contemporary neuroscience by focusing exclusively on higher-level cognitive (...), and ignoring the discipline's cell-physiological and molecular-biological core. (shrink)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  10.  47
    Huib L. de Jong & Maurice K. D. Schouten (2005). Ruthless Reductionism: A Review Essay of John Bickle's Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account. [REVIEW] Philosophical Psychology 18 (4):473-486.
    John Bickle's new book on philosophy and neuroscience is aptly subtitled 'a ruthlessly reductive account'. His 'new wave metascience' is a massive attack on the relative autonomy that psychology enjoyed until recently, and goes even beyond his previous (Bickle, J. (1998). Psychoneural reduction: The new wave. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.) new wave reductionsism. Reduction of functional psychology to (cognitive) neuroscience is no longer ruthless enough; we should now look rather to cellular or molecular neuroscience at the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  11
    Axel Seemann (ed.) (2012). Joint Attention: New Developments in Psychology, Philosophy of Mind, and Social Neuroscience. The MIT Press.
    Academic interest in the phenomenon of joint attention -- the capacity to attend to an object together with another creature -- has increased rapidly over the past two decades. Yet it isn't easy to spell out in detail what joint attention is, how it ought to be characterized, and what exactly its significance consists in. The writers for this volume address these and related questions by drawing on a variety of disciplines, including developmental and comparative psychology, philosophy of mind, (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  12. Patricia Smith Churchland, The Impact of Neuroscience on Philosophy.
    Philosophy, in its traditional guise, addresses questions where experimental science has not yet nailed down plausible explanatory theories. Thus, the ancient Greeks pondered the nature of life, the sun, and tides, but also how we learn and make decisions. The history of science can be seen as a gradual process whereby speculative philosophy cedes intellectual space to increasingly wellgrounded experimental disciplines—first astronomy, but followed by physics, chemistry, geology, biology, archaeology, and more recently, ethology, psychology, and neuroscience. Science (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  13.  17
    Philipp Koralus (2016). Can Visual Cognitive Neuroscience Learn Anything From the Philosophy of Language? Ambiguity and the Topology of Neural Network Models of Multistable Perception. Synthese 193 (5):1409-1432.
    The Necker cube and the productive class of related stimuli involving multiple depth interpretations driven by corner-like line junctions are often taken to be ambiguous. This idea is normally taken to be as little in need of defense as the claim that the Necker cube gives rise to multiple distinct percepts. In the philosophy of language, it is taken to be a substantive question whether a stimulus that affords multiple interpretations is a case of ambiguity. If we take into (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14. Karen Arnold, James Bogen, Ingo Brigandt, Joe Cain, Paul Griffiths, Catherine Kendig, James Lennox, Alan C. Love, Peter Machamer, Jacqueline Sullivan, Gianmatteo Mameli, Sandra Mitchell, David Papineau, Karola Stotz & D. M. Walsh, Titles and Abstracts for the Pitt-London Workshop in the Philosophy of Biology and Neuroscience: September 2001.
    Titles and abstracts for the Pitt-London Workshop in the Philosophy of Biology and Neuroscience: September 2001.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  15. John Bickle (ed.) (2013). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience. Oxford University Press Usa.
    The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy and Neuroscience is a state-of-the-art collection of interdisciplinary research spanning philosophy and current neuroscience. Containing chapters written by some of the most prominent philosophers working in this area, and in some cases co-authored with neuroscientists, this volume reflects both the breadth and depth of current work in this exciting field. Topics include the nature of explanation in neuroscience; whether and how current neuroscience is reductionistic; consequences of current research on (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  15
    Edward M. Hundert (1989). Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Neuroscience: Three Approaches to the Mind: A Synthetic Analysis of the Varieties of Human Experience. Oxford University Press.
    In this book Hundert proposes a new, unified view of the mind, one that integrates the insights of philosophers, psychologists, and neuroscientists. Through a detailed discussion of major theories from these and related disciplines, he gradually reveals links between what were previously unconnected approaches to human thought and experience.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  18
    Alvin I. Goldman (2009). Précis of "Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading". Philosophical Studies 144 (3):431 - 434.
    This article focuses on, and critiques, Goldman's view that third-person mind-reading is grounded in first-person introspection. It argues, on the contrary, that first-person awareness of propositional attitude events is always interpretative, resulting from us turning our mind-reading abilities upon ourselves.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  18.  12
    Lisa Bortolotti & Rachel Gunn (2015). Philip Gerrans The Measure of Madness: Philosophy of Mind, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Delusional Thought. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axv032.
    Review of Phil Gerrans' book on delusions, The Measure of Madness.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  19.  8
    Valtteri Arstila & Dan Lloyd (eds.) (2014). Subjective Time: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Temporality. The MIT Press.
    Our awareness of time and temporal properties is a constant feature of conscious life. Subjective temporality structures and guides every aspect of behavior and cognition, distinguishing memory, perception, and anticipation. This milestone volume brings together research on temporality from leading scholars in philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience, defining a new field of interdisciplinary research. The book's thirty chapters include selections from classic texts by William James and Edmund Husserl and new essays setting them in historical context; contemporary philosophical accounts (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20.  21
    Carl F. Craver & David M. Kaplan (2011). Towards a Mechanistic Philosophy of Neuroscience. In Steven French & Juha Saatsi (eds.), Continuum Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Continuum 268.
  21.  42
    Gabriel Vacariu, (Updated April 2016) Gabriel Vacariu The UNBELIEVABLE Similarities Between My Ideas (Philosophy, Physics, Cognitive Neuroscience 2005-2008) and Ideas of Other People (2011-2015).
    The UNBELIEVABLE similarities between my ideas (philosophy, philosophy of mind, cognitive neuroscience, quantum mechanics, and physics, mainly from 2005 to 2008) and the ideas of other people (from 2011 to 2015) (updated March 2016): Content: Introduction: The EDWs perspective in my article from 2005 and my book from 2008; Chapter 1 Philosophy (of mind): Did David Ludwig (2015, Philosophy, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands) plagiarize MANY of my ideas?; Chapter 2 Philosophy: Did Markus Gabriel plagiarize (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  82
    Ian Gold & Daniel Stoljar (1999). A Neuron Doctrine in the Philosophy of Neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 22 (5):809-830.
    It is widely held that a successful theory of the mind will be neuroscientific. In this paper we ask, first, what this claim means, and, secondly, whether it is true. In answer to the first question, we argue that the claim is ambiguous between two views--one plausible but unsubstantive, and one substantive but highly controversial. In answer to the second question, we argue that neither the evidence from neuroscience itself nor from other scientific and philosophical considerations supports the controversial (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  23.  7
    Lisa Bortolotti & Rachel Gunn (forthcoming). Philip Gerrans the Measure of Madness: Philosophy of Mind, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Delusional Thought. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axv032.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24. Alvin L. Goldman (2008). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. OUP Usa.
    People are minded creatures; we have thoughts, feelings and emotions. More intriguingly, we grasp our own mental states, and conduct the business of ascribing them to ourselves and others without instruction in formal psychology. How do we do this? And what are the dimensions of our grasp of the mental realm? In this book, Alvin I. Goldman explores these questions with the tools of philosophy, developmental psychology, social psychology and cognitive neuroscience. He refines an approach called simulation theory, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Alvin I. Goldman (2006). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. OUP Usa.
    In this study, Goldman argues that simulation is intensively used in mindreading tasks, from recognizing emotion in faces to assigning conceptual contents to thoughts. Psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and philosophy are applied to questions of third- and first- person mindreading, as well as mental concepts, moral psychology and other topics in social cognition.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26.  19
    Olivier Houdé (ed.) (2004). Dictionary of Cognitive Science: Neuroscience, Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, Linguistics, and Philosophy. Psychology Press.
    A translation of the renowned French reference book, Vocabulaire de sciences cognitives , the Dictionary of Cognitive Science presents comprehensive definitions of more than 120 terms. The editor and advisory board of specialists have brought together 60 internationally recognized scholars to give the reader a comprehensive understanding of the most current and dynamic thinking in cognitive science. Topics range from Abduction to Writing, and each entry covers its subject from as many perspectives as possible within the domains of psychology, artificial (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27. Alvin I. Goldman (2006). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford University Press Usa.
    People are minded creatures; we have thoughts, feelings and emotions. More intriguingly, we grasp our own mental states, and conduct the business of ascribing them to ourselves and others without instruction in formal psychology. How do we do this? And what are the dimensions of our grasp of the mental realm? In this book, Alvin I. Goldman explores these questions with the tools of philosophy, developmental psychology, social psychology and cognitive neuroscience. He refines an approach called simulation theory, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  28. Alvin I. Goldman (2008). Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology, and Neuroscience of Mindreading. Oxford University Press Usa.
    People are minded creatures; we have thoughts, feelings and emotions. More intriguingly, we grasp our own mental states, and conduct the business of ascribing them to ourselves and others without instruction in formal psychology. How do we do this? And what are the dimensions of our grasp of the mental realm? In this book, Alvin I. Goldman explores these questions with the tools of philosophy, developmental psychology, social psychology and cognitive neuroscience. He refines an approach called simulation theory, (...)
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  29. Bickle John, Mandik Peter & Anthony Landreth (2007). The Philosophy of Neuroscience. In Thaddeus Metz (ed.), Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30. Nathaniel F. Barrett (2011). Process Approaches to Consciousness in Psychology, Neuroscience, and Philosophy of Mind. American Journal of Theology and Philosophy 32 (2):197-200.
    I imagine that many readers of AJTP will find it hard to get excited about a new collection of essays about consciousness from the process perspective, no matter how good it is purported to be, because they are bored with the so-called "problem of consciousness" and uninterested in playing the role of the choir for what looks like a lot of old-fashioned Whiteheadian preaching. But in fact this book was conceived with the intention to do much more than preach to (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  31.  16
    Marina Paola Banchetti-Robino & Jean Pierre Noël Llored (2016). Reality Without Reification: Philosophy of Chemistry’s Contribution to Philosophy of Mind. In Grant Fisher Eric Scerri (ed.), Essays in the Philosophy of Chemistry. Oxford University Press 83-110.
    In this essay, we argue that there exist obvious parallels between questions that inform philosophy of chemistry and the so-called hard problem of consciousness in philosophy of mind. These include questions regarding the emergence of higher-level phenomena from lower-level physical states, the reduction of higher-level phenomena to lower-level physical states, and 'downward causation'. We, therefore, propose that the 'hard problem' of consciousness should be approached in a manner similar to that used to address parallel problems in philosophy (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32.  49
    M. R. Bennett (2003). Philosophical Foundations of Neuroscience. Blackwell Pub..
    In this work, two distinguished figures from neuroscience and philosophy present a detailed critical survey of the philosophical foundations of cognitive ...
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   89 citations  
  33. Eric Scerri & Andrea I. Woody (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience-Philosophy of Chemistry-Putting Quantum Mechanics to Work in Chemistry: The Power of Diagrammatic Representation. Philosophy of Science 67 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  34. Peter Godfrey-Smith (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience-The Developmental Systems Perspective in the Philosophy of Biology-Explanatory Symmetries, Preformation, and Developmental Systems Theory. Philosophy of Science 67 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  35. Peter Godfrey-Smith & Kim Sterelny (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience-The Developmental Systems Perspective in the Philosophy of Biology-Development, Evolution, and Adaptation. Philosophy of Science 67 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  36. Peter Godfrey-Smith & James Griesemer (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience-The Developmental Systems Perspective in the Philosophy of Biology-Development, Culture, and the Units of Inheritance. Philosophy of Science 67 (3).
  37. Peter Godfrey-Smith & Susan Oyama (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience-The Developmental Systems Perspective in the Philosophy of Biology-Causal Democracy and Causal Contributions in Developmental Systems Theory. Philosophy of Science 67 (3).
  38. Manfred D. Laubichier & Kenneth F. Schaffner (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience-The Organism in Philosophical Focus-Behavior at the Organismal and Molecular Levels: The Case of C. Elegans. Philosophy of Science 67 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Manfred D. Laubichier & Jack A. Wilson (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience-The Organism in Philosophical Focus-Ontological Butchery: Organism Concepts and Biological Generalizations. Philosophy of Science 67 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40. Manfred D. Laubichier, Manfred D. Laubichler & Gunter P. Wagner (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience-The Organism in Philosophical Focus-Organism and Character Decomposition: Steps Towards an Integrative Theory of Biology. Philosophy of Science 67 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. Manfred D. Laubichier & Rachel A. Ankeny (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience-The Organism in Philosophical Focus-Fashioning Descriptive Models in Biology: Of Worms and Wiring Diagrams. Philosophy of Science 67 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. J. R. Smythies (1993). The Impact of Contemporary Neuroscience and Introspection Psychology on the Philosophy of Perception. In Edmond Leo Wright (ed.), New Representationalisms: Essays in the Philosophy of Perception. Brookfield: Avebury 205--31.
  43. Andrew Wayne & Gordon N. Fleming (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience-Conceptual Foundations of Field Theories in Physics-Reeh-Schlieder Meets Newton-Wigner. Philosophy of Science 67 (3).
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Andrew Wayne & Sunny Y. Auyang (2000). Philosophy of Biology, Psychology, and Neuroscience-Conceptual Foundations of Field Theories in Physics-Mathematics and Reality: Two Notions of Spacetime in the Analytic and Constructionist Views. Philosophy of Science 67 (3).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  14
    Ian Gold (2003). Philosophy of Neuroscience. In L. Nadel (ed.), Encyclopedia of Cognitive Science. Nature Publishing Group
  46. Stephen Asma, Jaak Panksepp, Rami Gabriel & Glennon Curran (2012). Philosophical Implications of Affective Neuroscience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 19 (3-4):6-48.
    These papers are based on a Symposium at the COGSCI Conference in 2010. 1. Naturalizing the Mammalian Mind 2. Modularity in Cognitive Psychology and Affective Neuroscience 3. Affective Neuroscience and the Philosophy of Self 4. Affective Neuroscience and Law.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  5
    David Skrbina (2013). Process Approaches To Consciousness In Psychology, Neuroscience, And Philosophy Of Mind by Michel Weber And Anderson Weekes, Eds. Process Studies 41 (2):358-362.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  2
    Paolo Tripodi (2013). Conceptual Mediation: Philosophy Between the History of Physiology and Contemporary Neuroscience. History of European Ideas 40 (4):1-12.
    In the 1780s the anatomist Vincenzo Malacarne discussed the possibility of testing experimentally whether experience can induce significant changes in the brain. Malacarne imagined taking two littermate animals and giving intensive training to one while the other received none, then dissecting their brains to see whether the trained animal had more folds in the cerebellum than the untrained one. This experimental design somewhat anticipated one used 180 years later by Mark R. Rosenzweig at the University of California, Berkeley. This paper (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. William P. Bechtel (1988). Philosophy of Mind: An Overview for Cognitive Science. Lawrence Erlbaum.
    Specifically designed to make the philosophy of mind intelligible to those not trained in philosophy, this book provides a concise overview for students and researchers in the cognitive sciences. Emphasizing the relevance of philosophical work to investigations in other cognitive sciences, this unique text examines such issues as the meaning of language, the mind-body problem, the functionalist theories of cognition, and intentionality. As he explores the philosophical issues, Bechtel draws connections between philosophical views and theoretical and experimental work (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   120 citations  
  50.  20
    N. Gangopadhyay (2011). Alvin I. Goldman * Simulating Minds: The Philosophy, Psychology and Neuroscience of Mindreading. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 62 (2):437-441.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 1000