Search results for 'pragmatics' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Marco Mazzone (2011). Schemata and Associative Processes in Pragmatics. Journal of Pragmatics 43 (8):2148-2159.score: 21.0
    The notion of schema has been given a major role by Recanati within his conception of primary pragmatic processes, conceived as a type of associative process. I intend to show that Recanati’s considerations on schemata may challenge the relevance theorist’s argument against associative explanations in pragmatics, and support an argument in favor of associative (versus inferential) explanations. More generally, associative relations can be shown to be schematic, that is, they have enough structure to license inferential effects without any appeal (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. D. A. Cruse (2004). Meaning in Language: An Introduction to Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.score: 18.0
    A comprehensive introduction to the ways in which meaning is conveyed in language. Alan Cruse covers semantic matters, but also deals with topics that are usually considered to fall under pragmatics. A major aim is to highlight the richness and subtlety of meaning phenomena, rather than to expound any particular theory. Rich in examples and exercises, Meaning in Language provides an invaluable descriptive approach to this area of linguistics for undergraduates and postgraduates alike.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Christopher Gauker (2008). Zero Tolerance for Pragmatics. Synthese 165 (3):359–371.score: 18.0
    The proposition expressed by a sentence is relative to a context. But what determines the content of the context? Many theorists would include among these determinants aspects of the speaker’s intention in speaking. My thesis is that, on the contrary, the determinants of the context never include the speaker’s intention. My argument for this thesis turns on a consideration of the role that the concept of proposition expressed in context is supposed to play in a theory of linguistic communication. To (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Brendan S. Gillon (2008). On the Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Synthese 165 (3):373 - 384.score: 18.0
    This paper addresses two questions: what is the distinction between semantics and pragmatics? And why is this distinction important? These questions are discussed in light of the central explanatory goal of linguistics and in relation to the phenomenon of context sensitivity, as illustrated by relational words with implicit arguments and by so-called quantifier domain restriction. It is concluded that context sensitivity is, in the former case, grammatical or lexical and, in the latter case, neither.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Zoltán Gendler Szabó (ed.) (2005). Semantics Vs. Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.score: 18.0
    Leading scholars in the philosophy of language and theoretical linguistics present brand-new papers on a major topic at the intersection of the two fields, the distinction between semantics and pragmatics. Anyone engaged with this issue in either discipline will find much to reward their attention here. Contributors: Kent Bach, Herman Cappelen, Michael Glanzberg, Jeffrey C. King, Ernie Lepore, Stephen Neale, F. Recanati, Nathan Salmon, Mandy Simons, Scott Soames, Robert J. Stainton, Jason Stanley, Zoltan Gendler Szabo.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Juan Barba (2007). Formal Semantics in the Age of Pragmatics. Linguistics and Philosophy 30 (6):637-668.score: 18.0
    This paper aims to argue for two related statements: first, that formal semantics should not be conceived of as interpreting natural language expressions in a single model (a very large one representing the world as a whole, or something like that) but as interpreting them in many different models (formal counterparts, say, of little fragments of reality); second, that accepting such a conception of formal semantics yields a better comprehension of the relation between semantics and pragmatics and of the (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Karen S. Lewis (2012). Discourse Dynamics, Pragmatics, and Indefinites. Philosophical Studies 158 (2):313-342.score: 18.0
    Discourse dynamics, pragmatics, and indefinites Content Type Journal Article Pages 1-30 DOI 10.1007/s11098-012-9882-y Authors Karen S. Lewis, Department of Philosophy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA Journal Philosophical Studies Online ISSN 1573-0883 Print ISSN 0031-8116.
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Alessandro Capone (2013). On the Tension Between Semantics and Pragmatics. RASK: International Journal of Language and Communication 37:5-38.score: 18.0
    Loci of pragmatic intrusion signal the tension between semantics and pragmatics. -/- .
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Arthur Sullivan (2013). Multiple Propositions, Contextual Variability, and the Semantics/Pragmatics Interface. Synthese 190 (14):2773-2800.score: 18.0
    A ‘multiple-proposition (MP) phenomenon’ is a putative counterexample to the widespread implicit assumption that a simple indicative sentence (relative to a context of utterance) semantically expresses at most one proposition. Several philosophers and linguists (including Stephen Neale and Chris Potts) have recently developed hypotheses concerning this notion. The guiding questions motivating this research are: (1) Is there an interesting and homogenous semantic category of MP phenomena? (2) If so, what is the import? Do MP theories have any relevance to important (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Alessandro Capone (2013). The Pragmatics of Indirect Reports and Slurring. In , Perspectives on Linguistic Pragmatics. Springer. 153-184.score: 18.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Jonathan Berg (2012). Direct Belief: An Essay on the Semantics, Pragmatics, and Metaphysics of Belief. De Gruyter Mouton.score: 18.0
    Jonathan Berg argues for the Theory of Direct Belief, which treats having a belief about an individual as an unmediated relation between the believer and the individual the belief is about. After a critical review of alternative positions, Berg uses Grice's theory of conversational implicature to provide a detailed pragmatic account of substitution failure in belief ascriptions and goes on to defend this view against objections, including those based on an unwarranted "Inner Speech" Picture of Thought. The work serves as (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Frederic Goubier & Nausicaa Pouscoulous (2011). Virtus Sermonis and the Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction. Vivarium 49 (1-3):214-239.score: 18.0
    Late medieval theories of language and contemporary philosophy of language have been compared on numerous occasions. Here, we would like to compare two debates: that between the nature of Virtus sermonis , on the medieval side—focusing on a statute published in 1340 by the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris and its opponents—and, on the contemporary side, the on-going discussion on the semantics-pragmatics distinction and how the truth-value of an utterance should be established. Both the statute and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Charles Sayward (1974). The Received Distinction Between Pragmatics, Syntax and Semantics. Foundations of Language 11:97-104.score: 18.0
    The distinction between pragmatics, semantics, and syntax, at least as traditionally construed, is argued to be defective in various respects.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Marina Sbisà, Jan-Ola Östman & Jef Verschueren (eds.) (2011). Philosophical Perspectives for Pragmatics. John Benjamins Pub. Co..score: 18.0
    Introduction Marina Sbisà University of Trieste 1. Pragmatics and philosophy It is well known that pragmatics – like many branches of the social and even ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Louise Cummings (2005). Pragmatics: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. L. Erlbaum Associates.score: 18.0
    The first truly multidisciplinary text of its kind, this book offers an original analysis of the current state of linguistic pragmatics. Cummings argues that no study of pragmatics can reasonably neglect the historical and contemporary influences on this.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Colin B. Grant (2010). Beyond Universal Pragmatics: Studies in the Philosophy of Communication. Peter Lang.score: 18.0
    The explicit ambition of this collection is to move `beyond' the Universal Pragmatics of Jurgen Habermas.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. George W. Watson & Robyn Berkley (2009). Testing the Value-Pragmatics Hypothesis in Unethical Compliance. Journal of Business Ethics 87 (4):463 - 476.score: 18.0
    We test conformity-related values applying the value-pragmatics hypothesis by evaluating how personal values related to compliance moderate the relationships between situational factors and unethical decisions. We examine the direct and indirect effects of the values of traditionalism, conformity, and stimulation, as they combine with the situational factors of rewards and punishments in the person–situation interaction model. We find strong support for the value-pragmatics view of ethical decision making and further build support for the person–situation interaction model.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Guy Politzer & Laura Macchi (2000). Reasoning and Pragmatics. Mind and Society 1 (1):73-93.score: 18.0
    Language pragmatics is applied to analyse problem statements and instructions used in a few influential experimental tasks in the psychology of reasoning. This analysis aims to determine the interpretation of the task which the participant is likely to construct. It is applied to studies of deduction (where the interpretation of quantifiers and connectives is crucial) and to studies of inclusion judgment and probabilistic judgment. It is shown that the interpretation of the problem statements or even the representation of the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Ana Maria Mora-Marquez (2011). Pragmatics in Peter John Olivis Account of Signification of Common Names. Vivarium 49 (1-3):150-164.score: 18.0
    The aim of this paper is to present a reconstruction of Olivi's account of signification of common names and to highlight certain intrusion of pragmatics into this account. The paper deals with the question of how certain facts, other than original imposition, may be relevant to determine the semantical content of an utterance, and not with the question of how we perform actions by means of utterances. The intrusion of pragmatics into Olivi's semantics we intend to point out (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Marcelo Dascal (1983). Pragmatics and the Philosophy of Mind. J. Benjamins.score: 18.0
    This volume deals with the relation between pragmatics and the philosophy of mind.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Anton Benz (2012). Errors in Pragmatics. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 21 (1):97-116.score: 18.0
    In this paper we are going to show that error coping strategies play an essential role in linguistic pragmatics. We study the effect of noisy speaker strategies within a framework of signalling games with feedback loop. We distinguish between cases in which errors occur in message selection and cases in which they occur in signal selection. The first type of errors affects the content of an utterance, and the second type its linguistic expression. The general communication model is inspired (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Zoltan Szabo (ed.) (2005). Semantics Versus Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.score: 18.0
    Leading scholars in the philosophy of language and theoretical linguistics present brand-new papers on a major topic at the intersection of the two fields, the distinction between semantics and pragmatics. Anyone engaged with this issue in either discipline will find much to reward their attention here. Contributors: Kent Bach, Herman Cappelen, Michael Glanzberg, Jeffrey C. King, Ernie Lepore, Stephen Neale, F. Recanati, Nathan Salmon, Mandy Simons, Scott Soames, Robert J. Stainton, Jason Stanley, Zoltan Gendler Szabo.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Noel Burton-Roberts (ed.) (2007). Pragmatics. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 18.0
    This contribution to Palgrave's 'Advances' series addresses a wide range of issues that have arisen in post-Gricean pragmatic theory, in chapters by distinguished authors. Among the specific topics covered are scalar implicatures, lexical semantics and pragmatics, indexicality, procedural meaning, the semantics and pragmatics of negation. The volume includes both defences and critiques of Relevance Theory and of Neo-Gricean Pragmatics.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Talmy Givón (1989). Mind, Code, and Context: Essays in Pragmatics. L. Erlbaum Associates.score: 18.0
    Scholars concerned with the phenomenon of mind have searched through history for a principled yet non-reductionist approach to the study of knowledge, communication, and behavior. Pragmatics has been a recurrent theme in Western epistemology, tracing itself back from pre-Socratic dialectics and Aristotle's bio- functionalism, all the way to Wittgenstein's content-dependent semantics. This book's treatment of pragmatics as an analytic method focuses on the central role of context in determining the perception, organization, and communication of experience. As a bioadaptive (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Ken Turner (ed.) (1999). The Semantics/Pragmatics Interface From Different Points of View. Elsevier.score: 18.0
    This volume examines explicitly the question of how the semantics and pragmatics of a number of expressions might be responsibly discussed. In the past, the temptation has been for the expressions in question to be discussed either in terms of the semantics, or in terms of the pragmatics, but extremely rarely in terms of both. This book shows how revealing analyses for this interface can be provided for the expressions in question. In specially commissioned chapters from leading authors, (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Alessandro Capone (2013). The Pragmatics of Pronominal Clitics and Propositional Attitudes. Intercultural Pragmatics 10 (3):459-485.score: 17.0
    pronominal clitics, pragmatics and propositional attitudes.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Sam Alxatib, Peter Pagin & Uli Sauerland (2013). Acceptable Contradictions: Pragmatics or Semantics? A Reply to Cobreros Et Al. [REVIEW] Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (4):619-634.score: 16.0
    Naive speakers find some logical contradictions acceptable, specifically borderline contradictions involving vague predicates such as Joe is and isn’t tall. In a recent paper, Cobreros et al. (J Philos Logic, 2012) suggest a pragmatic account of the acceptability of borderline contradictions. We show, however, that the pragmatic account predicts the wrong truth conditions for some examples with disjunction. As a remedy, we propose a semantic analysis instead. The analysis is close to a variant of fuzzy logic, but conjunction and disjunction (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Fabrizio Amerini (2011). Pragmatics and Semantics in Thomas Aquinas. Vivarium 49 (1-3):95-126.score: 16.0
    Thomas Aquinas's account of the semantics of names is based on two fundamental distinctions: the distinction between a name's mode of signifying and the signified object, and that between the cause and the goal of a name's signification, i.e. that from which a name was instituted to signify and that which a name actually signifies. Thomas endows names with a two-layer signification: names are introduced into language to designate primarily conceptions of extramental things and secondarily the particular extramental things referred (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Paul Dimmock & Torfinn Thomesen Huvenes (forthcoming). Knowledge, Conservatism, and Pragmatics. Synthese:1-31.score: 16.0
    The apparent contextual variability exhibited by ‘knows’ and its cognates—brought to attention in examples like Keith DeRose’s Bank Case—poses familiar problems for conservative forms of invariantism about ‘knows’. The paper examines and criticises a popular response to those problems, one that involves appeal to so-called ‘pragmatic’ features of language. It is first argued, contrary to what seems to have been generally assumed, that any pragmatic defence faces serious problems with regard to our judgments about retraction. Second, the familiar objection that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Matt Lutz (2013). The Pragmatics of Pragmatic Encroachment. Synthese:1-24.score: 16.0
    The goal of this paper is to defend Simple Modest Invariantism (SMI) about knowledge from the threat presented by pragmatic encroachment. Pragmatic encroachment is the view that practical circumstances are relevant in some way to the truth of knowledge ascriptions—and if this is true, it would entail the falsity of SMI. Drawing on Ross and Schroeder’s recent Reasoning Disposition account of belief, I argue that the Reasoning Disposition account, together with Grice’s Maxims, gives us an attractive pragmatic account of the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Kent Bach (1999). The Semantics Pragmatics Distinction: What It is and Why It Matters. In K. Turner (ed.), The Semantics-Pragmatics Interface From Different Points of View. Elsevier. 65--84.score: 15.0
    The distinction between semantics and pragmatics is easier to apply than to explain. Explaining it is complicated by the fact that many conflicting formulations have been proposed over the past sixty years. This might suggest that there is no one way of drawing the distinction and that how to draw it is merely a terminological question, a matter of arbitrary stipulation. In my view, though, these diverse formulations, despite their conflicts, all shed light on the distinction as it is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. François Récanati (1987). Meaning and Force: The Pragmatics of Performative Utterances. Cambridge University Press.score: 15.0
    Its point of departure is a refutation of two views central to the work of speech-act theorists such as Austin & Searle: that speech acts are essentially ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Igor Douven (2010). The Pragmatics of Belief. Journal of Pragmatics 42 (1):35-47.score: 15.0
    This paper argues that pragmatic considerations similar to the ones that Grice has shown pertain to assertability pertain to acceptability. It further shows how this should affect some widely held epistemic principles. The idea of a pragmatics of belief is defended against some seemingly obvious objections.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Charles Sayward (1975). Pragmatics and Indexicality. Pragmatics Microfiche 1 (4):D5-D11.score: 15.0
    A conception of pragmatics distinguishes pragmatics from semantics proper in terms of indexicality: semantics is conceived as the quest for a truth definition for languages without indexical expressions; pragmatics is conceived as a quest for a truth definition for languages with indexical expressions. I argue that indexicality is not a feature that can be used to capture anything like what Morris and Carnap had in mind.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Jonas Åkerman (2009). A Plea for Pragmatics. Synthese 170 (1):155 - 167.score: 15.0
    Let intentionalism be the view that what proposition is expressed in context by a sentence containing indexicals depends on the speaker’s intentions. It has recently been argued that intentionalism makes communicative success mysterious and that there are counterexamples to the intentionalist view in the form of cases of mismatch between the intended interpretation and the intuitively correct interpretation. In this paper, I argue that these objections can be met, once we acknowledge that we may distinguish what determines the correct interpretation (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. A. J. B. Fugard, Niki Pfeifer & B. Mayerhofer (2011). Probabilistic Theories of Reasoning Need Pragmatics Too: Modulating Relevance in Uncertain Conditionals. Journal of Pragmatics 43:2034–2042.score: 15.0
    According to probabilistic theories of reasoning in psychology, people's degree of belief in an indicative conditional `if A, then B' is given by the conditional probability, P(B|A). The role of language pragmatics is relatively unexplored in the new probabilistic paradigm. We investigated how consequent relevance a ects participants' degrees of belief in conditionals about a randomly chosen card. The set of events referred to by the consequent was either a strict superset or a strict subset of the set of events (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. David S. Schwarz (1979). Naming and Referring: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Singular Terms. De Gruyter.score: 15.0
    I. Introduction As I sketched in my Preface, what frames this discussion is the opposition between the conceptual and the objective approaches to the ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Marco Mazzone (2009). Pragmatics and Cognition: Intentions and Pattern Recognition in Context. International Review of Pragmatics 1 (2):321-347.score: 15.0
    The importance of intention reading for communication has already been emphasized many<br>years ago by Paul Grice. More recently, the rich debate on “theory of mind” has convinced many<br>that intention reading may in fact play a key role also in current, cognitively oriented theories of<br>pragmatics: Relevance Th eory is a case in point. On a close analysis, however, it is far from clear<br>that RT may really accommodate the idea that intention reading drives comprehension. Here<br>I examine RT’s diffi culties with that (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Kjell Johan Sæbø (2007). Focus Interpretation in Thetic Statements: Alternative Semantics and Optimality Theory Pragmatics. [REVIEW] Journal of Logic, Language and Information 16 (1):15-33.score: 15.0
    Broad focus (or informational integration or nonautonomy) is lexically and contextually constrained, but these constraints are not well understood. On a standard theory of focus interpretation, the presupposition of a broad focus is verified whenever those of two narrow foci are. I argue that to account for cases where two narrow foci are preferred, it is necessary to assume that broad focus competes with two narrow foci and implicates the opposite of what they presuppose. Central constraints on thetic statements are (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Geoffrey N. Leech (1980). Explorations in Semantics and Pragmatics. Benjamins.score: 15.0
    INTRODUCTION The four papers in this book are slightly revised and updated versions of papers I wrote in the period 1973-77, while I was coming to terms ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Roger Lindsay (1996). Cognitive Technology and the Pragmatics of Impossible Plans — A Study in Cognitive Prosthetics. AI and Society 10 (3-4):273-288.score: 15.0
    Do AI programs just make it quicker and easier for humans to do what they can do already, or can the range of do-able things be extended? This paper suggests that cognitively-oriented technology can make it possible for humans to construct and carry out mental operations, which were previously impossible. Probable constraints upon possible human mental operations are identified and the impact of cognitive technology upon them is evaluated. It is argued that information technology functions as a cognitive prosthetic enhancing (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Colin T. Schmidt (1996). The Person-Machine Confrontation: Investigations Into the Pragmatics of Dialogism. [REVIEW] AI and Society 10 (3-4):315-332.score: 15.0
    Erroneously attributing propositional attitudes (desires, beliefs...) to computational artefacts has become internationally commonplace in the public arena, especially amongst the new generation of non-initiated users. Technology for rendering machines “user-friendly” is often inspired by interpersonal human communication. This calls forth designers to conceptualise a major component of human intelligence: the sense ofcommunicability, and its logical consequences. The inherentincommunicability of machines subsequently causes a shift in design strategy. Though cataloguing components of bouts between person and machine with Speech Act Theory has (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Mary Besemeres & Anna Wierzbicka (2003). Pragmatics and Cognition: The Meaning of the Particle Lah in Singapore English. Pragmatics and Cognition 11 (1):3-38.score: 15.0
    In this paper we try to crack one of the hardest and most intriguing chestnuts in the field of cross-cultural pragmatics and to identify the meaning of the celebrated Singaporean particle lah ¿ the hallmark of Singapore English. In pursuing this goal, we investigate the use of lah and seek to identify its meaning by trying to find a paraphrase in ordinary language which would be substitutable for lah in any context. In doing so, we try to enter the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Alessandro Capone (2010). Between Scylla and Charibdis: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Attitudes 'de Se'. Intercultural Pragmatics 7 (3):471-503.score: 15.0
    'de se' attitudes and pragmatic intrusion. A critique of Higginbotham (2003).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Herman Cappelen (2007). Semantics and Pragmatics: Some Central Issues. In Gerhard Preyer & Georg Peter (eds.), Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: New Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics. Oxford University Press. 3--24.score: 15.0
    Introduction to Context-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism: Essays on Semantics and Pragmatics, 2007, Oxford University Press, (eds. Preyer and Peter).
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Alessandro Capone (2013). The Role of Pragmatics in (Re)Constructing the Rational Law-Maker. Pragmatics and Cognition 21 (2):399-414.score: 15.0
    The recent debate on pragmatics and the law has found ways to circumvent an important distinction, originally drawn by Dascal and Wróblewski (1991), between the historical law-maker, the current law-maker, and the ideal/rational law-maker.1 By insisting on the relationship between the rational law-maker and contextualism and textualism (see Manning 2005, 2006), I want to redress this fault in current discussions. In this paper, I start with general considerations on pragmatics, intentionality in ordinary conversation, and intentionality in the context (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. P. Denis (ed.) (2006). Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference: Issues at the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Cascadilla Proceedings Project.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. J. A. G. Groenendijk, Dick de Jongh & M. J. B. Stokhof (eds.) (1986/1987). Foundations of Pragmatics and Lexical Semantics. Providence, Ri, Usa,Foris Publications ;.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Katarzyna Jaszczolt & Ken Turner (eds.) (1996). Contrastive Semantics and Pragmatics. Pergamon.score: 15.0
    v. 1. Meanings and representations -- v. 2. Discourse strategies.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. R. M. Martin (1959/1974). Toward a Systematic Pragmatics. Westport, Conn.,Greenwood Press.score: 15.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000