Search results for 'professor Howard, Don' (try it on Scholar)

90 found
Sort by:
  1. E. W. Whittle (1974). The Seven Against Thebes Howard Don Cameron: Studies on the Seven Against Thebes of Aeschylus. (Studies in Classical Literature, 8.) Pp. 108. The Hague: Mouton, 1971. Paper, Fl. 22. [REVIEW] The Classical Review 24 (01):18-19.score: 140.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Martin Carrier, Don Howard & Janet A. Kourany (2008). The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited. University of Pittsburgh Press.score: 129.0
    ISBN-13: 978-0-8229-4317-4 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8229-4317-4 (cloth : alk. paper) 1. Science — Philosophy. 2. Science — Social aspects. 3. Values. 4. Science and civilization. I. Carrier, Martin. II. Howard, Don, professor. III. Kourany ...
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Griffin Trotter (1999). Response to “Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Don't Use the Wrong Cases” by Howard Brody and “Commentary: Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Are the Cases Wrong?” by L.J. Schneiderman (CQ Vol 7, No 3). [REVIEW] Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 8 (04):527-537.score: 126.0
    In a recent issue of CambridgeQuarterlyofHealthcareEthics, Howard Brody and Lawrence Schneiderman offer contrasting opinions about how to apply the concept of in medicine. Brody holds that are those in which it is reasonably certain that a given intervention when applied for the purpose of attaining a specific clinical goal. To determine which actions are futile, Brody prescribes a division of labor. Patients (or patient surrogates) are charged with choosing the goals of treatment while physicians are charged with determining whether specific (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Miriam Solomon (2008). Review of Martin Carrier, Don Howard, Janet Kourany (Eds.), The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (6).score: 120.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Arri Eisen & Roberta M. Berry (2002). The Absent Professor: Why We Don't Teach Research Ethics and What to Do About It. American Journal of Bioethics 2 (4):38 – 49.score: 120.0
    Research ethics education in the biosciences has not historically been a priority for research universities despite the fact that funding agencies, government regulators, and the parties involved in the research enterprise agree that it ought to be. The confluence of a number of factors, including scrutiny and regulation due to increased public awareness of the impact of basic research on society, increased public and private funding, increased diversity and collaboration among researchers, the impressive success and speed of research advances, and (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Phillip Catton (2003). Don Howard and John Stachel (Eds), Einstein: The Formative Years, 1879–1909. The Einstein Studies Series, Volume. [REVIEW] Metascience 12 (1):71-74.score: 120.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Jay Foster (2010). Martin Carrier, Don Howard and Janet Kourany, Eds. The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited Reviewed By. Philosophy in Review 30 (3):169-172.score: 120.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Alan R. Perreiah & professor Howard, Don (1982). History of Logic. Journal of the History of Philosophy 20 (1):101-106.score: 87.0
  9. Don Howard, Bas van Fraassen, Otávio Bueno, Elena Castellani, Laura Crosilla, Steven French & Décio Krause (2011). The Physics and Metaphysics of Identity and Individuality. Metascience 20 (2):225-251.score: 52.0
    The physics and metaphysics of identity and individuality Content Type Journal Article DOI 10.1007/s11016-010-9463-7 Authors Don Howard, Department of Philosophy and Graduate Program in History and Philosophy of Science, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA Bas C. van Fraassen, Philosophy Department, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94132, USA Otávio Bueno, Department of Philosophy, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL 33124, USA Elena Castellani, Department of Philosophy, University of Florence, Via Bolognese 52, 50139 (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Jamee Gresley, Heidi Wallace, Julie M. Hupp & Sara Staats (2009). Heroes Don't Cheat: An Examination of Academic Dishonesty and Students' Views on Why Professors Don't Report Cheating. Ethics and Behavior 19 (3):171-183.score: 42.0
    Some students do not cheat. Students high in measures of bravery, honesty, and empathy, our defining characteristics of heroism, report less past cheating than other students. These student heroes also reported that they would feel more guilt if they cheated and also reported less intent to cheat in the future than nonheroes. We find general consensus between students and professors as to reasons for the nonreporting of cheating, suggesting a general impression of insufficient evidence, lack of courage, and denial. Suggested (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Frances Howard-Snyder (2008). Damned If You Do; Damned If You Don't! Philosophia 36 (1):1-15.score: 36.0
    This paper discusses the Principle of Normative Invariance: ‘An action’s moral status does not depend on whether or not it is performed.’ I show the importance of this principle for arguments regarding actualism and other variations on the person-affecting restriction, discuss and rebut arguments in favor of the principle, and then discuss five counterexamples to it. I conclude that the principle as it stands is false; and that if it is modified to avoid the counterexamples, it is gutted of any (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Howard Young (2000). Game of Circles: Conversations Between Don Quixote and Sancho. Philosophy and Literature 24 (2):377-386.score: 36.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Daniel S. Goldberg & Howard Brody (2007). Spirituality: Respect but Don't Reveal. American Journal of Bioethics 7 (7):21 – 22.score: 36.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Karin Buhmann (2012). Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't? The Lundbeck Case of Pentobarbital, the Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, and Competing Human Rights Responsibilities. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 40 (2):206-219.score: 36.0
    In 2011 it emerged that to induce the death penalty, United States authorities had begun giving injections of pentobarbital, a substance provided by Danish pharmaceutical company Lundbeck. Lundbeck's product pentobarbital is licensed for treatment of refractory forms of epilepsy and for usage as an anaesthetic, thus for a very different purpose. The Lundbeck case offers a difficult, but also interesting Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) dilemma between choices facing a pharmaceutical company to stop the distribution of a medical substance in order (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Katie Davis, Scott Seider & Howard Gardner (2008). When False Representations Ring True (and When They Don't). Social Research: An International Quarterly 75 (4):1085-1108.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Don Devault (1981). World Views on Energy, Not Entropy Entropy: A New World View Jeremy Rifkin Ted Howard. BioScience 31 (8):605-605.score: 36.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Howard Brody (1998). Bringing Clarity to the Futility Debate: Don't Use the Wrong Cases. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 7 (03):269-273.score: 36.0
    Among those who criticize the concept of a common refrain is that we really have no idea what futility means. For example, physicians seem to disagree on whether a treatment being futile means that it has a less than 5% chance of working or a 20% chance of working. If the concept is so unclear, then it seems a thin reed upon which to base a momentous ethical decision—namely, that the physician's judgment should be allowed to override the wishes of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Mike LaBossiere (2008). What Don't You Know?: Philosophical Provocations. Continuum.score: 36.0
    _ "LaBossiere brilliantly tackles many of the toughest ethical dilemmas of our times, from gender selection, cloning and sexual inequality to violence in the media and the conduct of warfare. In an age of snap judgments and stereotypes, he approaches his topics in a refreshingly open-minded fashion. His quick wit and firm knowledge of contemporary culture bring philosophy full-force into the 21st century." —Paul Halpern, Professor Of Physics, University Of The Sciences in Philadelphia and author of What's Science Ever (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Don Howard (1985). Einstein on Locality and Separability. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 16 (3):171-201.score: 28.0
  20. Don Howard, The Metaphysics of Entanglement and the Entanglement of Metaphysics.score: 28.0
    (STARS Conference, Cancún, January 2007).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Don Howard (1994). What Makes a Classical Concept Classical? Toward a Reconstruction of Niels Bohr's Philosophy of Physics. In Niels Bohr and Contemporary Philosophy. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 201--230.score: 28.0
    — Niels Bohr, 19231 “There must be quite definite and clear grounds, why you repeatedly declare that one must interpret observations classically, which lie absolute ly in thei r essenc e. . . . It must belong to your deepest conviction—and I cannot understand on what you base it.”.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Don Howard (forthcoming). Revisiting the Einstein-Bohr Dialogue. Iyyun:57.score: 28.0
    as the chief novelty in the quantum description of nature, Einstein for having found vindication in 3 relativity theory for either positivism or realism, depending upon whom one asks. Famous as is each in his own domain, they are famous also, together, for their decades-long disagreement over the future of fundamental physics, their respective embrace and rejection of quantum indeterminacy being only the most widely-known point of contention.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Don Howard, Are Elementary Particles Individuals? A Critical Appreciation of Steven French and Décio Krause's Identity in Physics: A Historical, Philosophical, and Formal Analysis.score: 28.0
    Steven French and Décio Krause have written what bids fair to be, for years to come, the definitive philosophical treatment of the problem of the individuality of elementary particles in quantum mechanics and quantum field theory. The book begins with a long and dense argument for the view that elementary particles are most helpfully regarded as non-individuals, and it concludes with an earnest attempt to develop a formal apparatus for describing such non-individual entities better suited to the task than our (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Don Howard (2004). Who Invented the “Copenhagen Interpretation”? A Study in Mythology. Philosophy of Science 71 (5):669-682.score: 28.0
    What is commonly known as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, regarded as representing a unitary Copenhagen point of view, differs significantly from Bohr's complementarity interpretation, which does not employ wave packet collapse in its account of measurement and does not accord the subjective observer any privileged role in measurement. It is argued that the Copenhagen interpretation is an invention of the mid‐1950s, for which Heisenberg is chiefly responsible, various other physicists and philosophers, including Bohm, Feyerabend, Hanson, and Popper, having (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Don Howard (1990). Einstein and Duhem. Synthese 83 (3):363 - 384.score: 28.0
    Pierre Duhem's often unrecognized influence on twentieth-century philosophy of science is illustrated by an analysis of his significant if also largely unrecognized influence on Albert Einstein. Einstein's first acquaintance with Duhem's La Théorie physique, son objet et sa structure around 1909 is strongly suggested by his close personal and professional relationship with Duhem's German translator, Friedrich Adler. The central role of a Duhemian holistic, underdeterminationist variety of conventionalism in Einstein's thought is examined at length, with special emphasis on Einstein's deployment (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Alan W. Richardson & Don Howard (2003). The Contexts of Philosophy of Science. Perspectives on Science 11 (1):1-2.score: 28.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Don Howard, Einstein and the Development of Twentieth-Century Philosophy of Science.score: 28.0
    What is Albert Einstein’s place in the history of twentieth-century philosophy of science? Were one to consult the histories produced at mid-century from within the Vienna Circle and allied movements (e.g., von Mises 1938, 1939, Kraft 1950, Reichenbach 1951), then one would find, for the most part, two points of emphasis. First, Einstein was rightly remembered as the developer of the special and general theories of relativity, theories which, through their challenge to both scientific and philosophical orthodoxy made vivid the (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Don Howard, And I Shall Not Mingle Conjectures and Certainties: Einstein on the Principle Theories-Constructive Theories Distinction.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Don Howard (2006). Lost Wanderers in the Forest of Knowledge: Some Thoughts on the Discovery-Justification Distinction. In Jutta Schickore & Friedrich Steinle (eds.), Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction. Springer. 3--22.score: 28.0
    Neo-positivism is dead. Let that imperfect designation stand for the project that dominated and defined the philosophy of science, especially in its Anglophone form, during the fifty or so years following the end of the Second World War. While its critics were many,1 its death was slow, and some think still to find a pulse.2 But die it did in the cul-de-sac into which it was led by its own faulty compass.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Don Howard, Einstein, Kant, and the Origins of Logical Empiricism.score: 28.0
    more on the history of the Vienna Circle and its allies, see Coffa 1991; Friedman 1983; Hailer 1982, 1985; Kraft 1950; and Proust 1986, 1989). Without question, however, the crucial, formative, early intellectual experience of at least Schlick, Reichenbach, and Carnap, the experience that did most to give form and content to their emergent philosophies of science, was their engagement with relativity theory. Thus, after a few early writings on more general philosophical themes, Schlick first caught the attention of a (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Don A. Howard, Einstein's Philosophy of Science. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Don Howard (2007). Reduction and Emergence in the Physical Sciences: Some Lessons From the Particle Physics and Condensed Matter Debate. In Nancey C. Murphy & William R. Stoeger (eds.), Evolution and Emergence: Systems, Organisms, Persons. Oxford University Press. 141--157.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Don Howard, Physics as Theodicy.score: 28.0
    On Saturday, August 26, 1893, thirteen-year-old Edith Low Babson was swimming in her favorite swimming hole on the Annisquam river in her home town of Gloucester, Massachusetts. Though she was a strong swimmer, something went wrong, and she drowned. A tragedy like all such. But this drowning had unusual consequences. Edith’s older brother was Roger W. Babson, who grew up to become one of America’s most prominent businessmen of the early twentieth century. A statistician, prolific author, philanthropist, founder of Babson (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Don Howard, “No Crude Surfeit”: A Critical Appreciation of the Reign of Relativity.score: 28.0
    Such are those thick & gloomie shadows dampe Oft seene in charnel vaults, & sepulchers, Lingering, & sitting by a new made grave, As loath to leave the bodie that it lov'd, & link’t it selfe by carnall sensualtie To a degenerate, & degraded state.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Don Howard (1998). Astride the Divided Line: Platonism, Empiricism, and Einstein's Epistemological Opportunism. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 63:143-164.score: 28.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Don Howard (2000). Preface. Philosophy of Science 67 (S1):ix.score: 28.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Don A. Howard (2003). Two Left Turns Make a Right: On the Curious Political Career of North American Philosophy of Science at Midcentury. In Logical Empiricism in North America. University of Minnesota Press.score: 28.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Don Howard (1985). Antipositivist Theories of the Sciences. Review of Metaphysics 39 (2):377-378.score: 28.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Don Howard (1979). Commoner on Reductionism. Environmental Ethics 1 (2):159-176.score: 28.0
    Barry Commoner has argued that the environmental failure of modern technology is due in large part to the reductionistic character ofmodern science, especially its biological component where the reductionist approach has triumphed in molecular biology. I claim, first, that Commoner has confused reduction in the sense of the reduction of one theory to another with what is better called analysis, or the strategy of breaking a whoie into its parts in order to understand the properties of the whole, this latter (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Don Howard & Arthur Schopenhauer (1997). A Peek Behind the Veil of Maya. In John Earman & John Norton (eds.), The Cosmos of Science. University of Pittsburgh Press. 87--152.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Don Howard (2010). Let Me Briefly Indicate Why I Do Not Find This Standpoint Natural" : Einstein, General Relativity, and the Contingent a Priori. In Michael Friedman, Mary Domski & Michael Dickson (eds.), Discourse on a New Method: Reinvigorating the Marriage of History and Philosophy of Science. Open Court. 333--355.score: 28.0
  42. Don Howard (1991). Review Essay. Synthese 86 (1):123-141.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. David Wiggins, George Sherman Union, Mara Beller, Don Howard, Evelyn Fox Keller, Scott Gilbert, Margaret Morrison, Michael Dickson & Alisa Bokulich (2002). Boston Colloquium for Philosophy of Science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 33:207-211.score: 28.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Abhay Ashtekar, Jürgen Renn, Don Howard, Abner Shimony & S. Sarkar (eds.) (2002). Revisiting the Foundations of Relativistic Physics. Festschrift in Honour of John Stachel. Kluwer.score: 28.0
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Jane Azevedo, John Forge, Alan MacKay-Sim, Merry Maisel & Don Howard (1998). Biomedical Research, Methodology, and the Moral Sense. Metascience 7 (2):237-272.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Michael Dickson, Don Howard, Scott Tanona, Mathias Frisch, Eric Winsberg, Arnold Koslow, Paul Teller, Ronald N. Giere, Mary S. Morgan & Mauricio Suárez (2004). 1. Preface Preface (P. Vii). Philosophy of Science 71 (5).score: 28.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Don Howard (1999). Preface. Philosophy of Science 66 (S1):vii.score: 28.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Don A. Howard, A Brief on Behalf of Bohr.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    |
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Don A. Howard (2006). Albert Einstein como filósofo da ciência. Critica.score: 28.0
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Don Howard (1989). Holism, Separability, and the Metaphysical Implications of the Bell Experiments. In James T. Cushing & Ernan McMullin (eds.), Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory. University of Notre Dame Press. 224--253.score: 28.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 90