Search results for 'quantum entanglement' (try it on Scholar)

999 found
Sort by:
  1. Andreas Hüttemann (2005). Explanation, Emergence and Quantum-Entanglement. Philosophy of Science 72 (1):114-127.score: 240.0
    This paper tries to get a grip on two seemingly conflicting intuitions about reductionism in quantum mechanics. On the one hand it is received wisdom that quantum mechanics puts an end to ‘reductionism’. Quantum-entanglement is responsible for such features of quantum mechanics as holism, the failure of supervenience and emergence. While I agree with these claims I will argue that it is only part of the story. Quantum mechanics provides us with thorough-going reductionist explanations. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Elizabeth Miller (2013). Quantum Entanglement, Bohmian Mechanics, and Humean Supervenience. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 92 (3):1-17.score: 240.0
    David Lewis is a natural target for those who believe that findings in quantum physics threaten the tenability of traditional metaphysical reductionism. Such philosophers point to allegedly holistic entities they take both to be the subjects of some claims of quantum mechanics and to be incompatible with Lewisian metaphysics. According to one popular argument, the non-separability argument from quantum entanglement, any realist interpretation of quantum theory is straightforwardly inconsistent with the reductive conviction that the complete (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Thilo Hinterberger & Nikolaus Stillfried (2013). The Concept of Complementarity and its Role in Quantum Entanglement and Generalized Entanglement. Axiomathes 23 (3):443-459.score: 222.0
    The term complementarity plays a central role in quantum physics, not least in various approaches to defining entanglement and the conditions for its occurrence. It has, however, been used in a variety of ways by different authors, denoting different concepts and relationships. Here we describe and clarify some of them and analyze the role they play with respect to the phenomenon of entanglement. Based on these considerations we discuss the recently proposed system-theoretical generalization of the concepts (...) and complementarity (Atmanspacher et al. in Found Phys 32(3):379–406, 2002; von Lucadou et al. in J Conscious Stud 14(4):50–74, 2007; Filk and Römer in Axiomathes 21(2):211–220, 2011; Walach and Von Stillfried in Axiomathes 21(2): 185–209, 2011). We hope that a clarification regarding the specific meaning of these terms can be useful to the growing engagement with this interesting hypothesis and its critical investigation. (shrink)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Thilo Hinterberger & Nikolaus von Stillfried (2013). The Concept of Complementarity and its Role in Quantum Entanglement and Generalized Entanglement. Axiomathes 23 (3):443-459.score: 222.0
    The term complementarity plays a central role in quantum physics, not least in various approaches to defining entanglement and the conditions for its occurrence. It has, however, been used in a variety of ways by different authors, denoting different concepts and relationships. Here we describe and clarify some of them and analyze the role they play with respect to the phenomenon of entanglement. Based on these considerations we discuss the recently proposed system-theoretical generalization of the concepts (...) and complementarity (Atmanspacher et al. in Found Phys 32(3):379–406, 2002; von Lucadou et al. in J Conscious Stud 14(4):50–74, 2007; Filk and Römer in Axiomathes 21(2):211–220, 2011; Walach and Von Stillfried in Axiomathes 21(2): 185–209, 2011). We hope that a clarification regarding the specific meaning of these terms can be useful to the growing engagement with this interesting hypothesis and its critical investigation. (shrink)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Luke Fenton-Glynn & Thomas Kroedel (2013). Relativity, Quantum Entanglement, Counterfactuals, and Causation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science:axt040.score: 212.0
    We investigate whether standard counterfactual analyses of causation (CACs) imply that the outcomes of space-like separated measurements on entangled particles are causally related. Although it has sometimes been claimed that standard CACs imply such a causal relation, we argue that a careful examination of David Lewis’s influential counterfactual semantics casts doubt on this. We discuss ways in which Lewis’s semantics and standard CACs might be extended to the case of space-like correlations. 1 Introduction2 Measurement Outcomes and Counterfactual Analyses of Causation3 (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. P. Schust, M. Mattes & M. Sorg (2004). Quantum Entanglement in Relativistic Three-Particle Systems. Foundations of Physics 34 (1):99-167.score: 210.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Towards A. Possible Explanation Of Quantum (1999). The Creation, Discovery, View: Towards a Possible Explanation of Quantum Reality. In Maria Luisa Dalla Chiara (ed.), Language, Quantum, Music. 105.score: 210.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Michael E. Cuffaro, On the Necessity of Entanglement for the Explanation of Quantum Speedup.score: 192.0
    Of the many and varied applications of quantum information theory, perhaps the most fascinating is the sub-field of quantum computation. In this sub-field, computational algorithms are designed which utilise the resources available in quantum systems in order to compute solutions to computational problems with, in some cases, exponentially fewer resources than any known classical algorithm. While the fact of quantum computational speedup is almost beyond doubt, the source of quantum speedup is still a matter of (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Florian Hulpke, Uffe V. Poulsen, Anna Sanpera, Aditi Sen, Ujjwal Sen & Maciej Lewenstein (2006). Unitarity as Preservation of Entropy and Entanglement in Quantum Systems. Foundations of Physics 36 (4):477-499.score: 192.0
    The logical structure of Quantum Mechanics (QM) and its relation to other fundamental principles of Nature has been for decades a subject of intensive research. In particular, the question whether the dynamical axiom of QM can be derived from other principles has been often considered. In this contribution, we show that unitary evolutions arise as a consequences of demanding preservation of entropy in the evolution of a single pure quantum system, and preservation of entanglement in the evolution (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Gregg Jaeger (2012). Generalized Quantum Probability and Entanglement Enhancement Witnessing. Foundations of Physics 42 (6):752-759.score: 192.0
    It has been suggested (cf. Sinha et al. in Science 329:418, 2010) that the Born rule for quantum probability could be violated. It has also been suggested that, in a generalized version of quantum mechanical probability theory such as that proposed by Sorkin (Mod. Phys. Lett. A 9:3119, 1994) there might occur deviations from the predictions of quantum probability in cases where more than two paths are available to a self-interfering system. These would lead to additional contributions (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. John W. Clark, Hessam Habibian, Aikaterini D. Mandilara & Manfred L. Ristig (2010). Aspects of Entanglement in Quantum Many-Body Systems. Foundations of Physics 40 (9-10):1200-1220.score: 192.0
    Knowledge of the entanglement properties of the wave functions commonly used to describe quantum many-particle systems can enhance our understanding of their correlation structure and provide new insights into quantum phase transitions that are observed experimentally or predicted theoretically. To illustrate this theme, we first examine the bipartite entanglement contained in the wave functions generated by microscopic many-body theory for the transverse Ising model, a system of Pauli spins on a lattice that exhibits an order-disorder magnetic (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. William K. Wootters (2012). Entanglement Sharing in Real-Vector-Space Quantum Theory. Foundations of Physics 42 (1):19-28.score: 192.0
    The limitation on the sharing of entanglement is a basic feature of quantum theory. For example, if two qubits are completely entangled with each other, neither of them can be at all entangled with any other object. In this paper we show, at least for a certain standard definition of entanglement, that this feature is lost when one replaces the usual complex vector space of quantum states with a real vector space. Moreover, the difference between the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Michael Esfeld (2004). Quantum Entanglement and a Metaphysics of Relations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (4):601-617.score: 180.0
    This paper argues for a metaphysics of relations based on a characterization of quantum entanglement in terms of non-separability, thereby regarding entanglement as a sort of holism. By contrast to a radical metaphysics of relations, the position set out in this paper recognizes things that stand in the relations, but claims that, as far as the relations are concerned, there is no need for these things to have qualitative intrinsic properties underlying the relations. This position thus opposes (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. John Earman (forthcoming). Some Puzzles and Unresolved Issues About Quantum Entanglement. Erkenntnis:1-35.score: 180.0
    Schrödinger (Proc Camb Philos Soc 31:555–563, 1935) averred that entanglement is the characteristic trait of quantum mechanics. The first part of this paper is simultaneously an exploration of Schrödinger’s claim and an investigation into the distinction between mere entanglement and genuine quantum entanglement. The typical discussion of these matters in the philosophical literature neglects the structure of the algebra of observables, implicitly assuming a tensor product structure of the simple Type I factor algebras used in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Dagmar Bruß & Chiara Macchiavello (2003). On the Entanglement Structure in Quantum Cloning. Foundations of Physics 33 (11):1617-1628.score: 174.0
    We study the entanglement properties of the output state of a universal cloning machine. We analyse in particular bipartite and tripartite entanglement of the clones, and discuss the “classical limit” of infinitely many output copies.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Tomasz Bigaj (2006). Non-Locality and Possible Worlds. A Counterfactual Perspective on Quantum Entanglement. Ontos Verlag.score: 164.0
    This book uses the formal semantics of counterfactual conditionals to analyze the problem of non-locality in quantum mechanics. Counterfactual conditionals enter the analysis of quantum entangled systems in that they enable us to precisely formulate the locality condition that purports to exclude the existence of causal interactions between spatially separated parts of a system. They also make it possible to speak consistently about alternative measuring settings, and to explicate what is meant by quantum property attributions. The book (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Harald Atmanspacher (2002). Weak Quantum Theory: Complementarity and Entanglement in Physics and Beyond. [REVIEW] Foundations of Physics 32 (3):379-406.score: 156.0
    The concepts of complementarity and entanglement are considered with respect to their significance in and beyond physics. A formally generalized, weak version of quantum theory, more general than ordinary quantum theory of physical systems, is outlined and tentatively applied to two examples.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Alisa Bokulich & Gregg Jaeger (eds.) (2010). Philosophy of Quantum Information and Entanglement. Cambridge University Press.score: 156.0
    "Entanglement can be understood as an extraordinary degree of correlation between states of quantum systems - a correlation that cannot be given an explanation ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. John Stachel (1997). Feynman Paths and Quantum Entanglement: Is There Any More to the Mystery? In Robert S. Cohen, Michael Horne & John Stachel (eds.), Potentiality, Entanglement and Passion-at-a-Distance. Kluwer Academic Publishers. 245--256.score: 156.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Frederick M. Kronz (1991). Quantum Entanglement and Nonideal Measurements: A Critique of Margenau's Objections to the Projection Postulate. Synthese 89 (2):229 - 251.score: 152.0
    I defend the projection postulate against two of Margenau's criticisms. One involves two types of nonideal measurements, measurements that disturb and measurements that annihilate. Such measurements cannot be characterized using the original version of the projection postulate. This is one of the most interesting and powerful objections to the projection postulate since most realistic measurements are nonideal, in Margenau's sense. I show that a straightforward generalization of the projection postulate is capable of handling the more realistic kinds of measurements considered (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Michael Dickson (2007). Review of Tomasz F. Bigaj, Non-Locality and Possible Worlds: A Counterfactual Perspective on Quantum Entanglement. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2007 (7).score: 150.0
  22. Jeffrey Bub, Quantum Entanglement and Information. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 150.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Vincent Lam (2013). The Entanglement Structure of Quantum Field Systems. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 27 (1):59 - 72.score: 150.0
    This article discusses the peculiar features of quantum entanglement and quantum non-locality within the algebraic approach to relativistic quantum field theory (RQFT). The debate on the ontology of RQFT is considered in the light of these well-known but little discussed features. In particular, this article examines the ontic structural realist understanding of quantum entanglement and quantum non-locality and its contribution to this debate.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Douglas M. Snyder (2009). Haunted Quantum Entanglement. Foundations of Physics 19:679-704.score: 150.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Leah Henderson (2002). Measuring Quantum Entanglement. In. In T. Placek & J. Butterfield (eds.), Non-Locality and Modality. Kluwer. 137--152.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. C. Ribeiro (forthcoming). Love-in-Idleness: Quantum Entanglement Dreamscapes. Technoetic Arts.score: 150.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. J. P. Singh (2009). Quantum Entanglement Through Quaternions. Apeiron 16 (4):491.score: 150.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Rob Clifton (2002). The Subtleties of Entanglement and its Role in Quantum Information Theory. Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2002 (3):S150-S167.score: 144.0
    My aim in this paper is a modest one. I do not have any particular thesis to advance about the nature of entanglement, nor can I claim novelty for any of the material I shall discuss. My aim is simply to raise some questions about entanglement that spring naturally from certain developments in quantum information theory and are, I believe, worthy of serious consideration by philosophers of science. The main topics I discuss are different manifestations of (...) nonlocality, entanglement-assisted communication, and entanglement thermodynamics. (shrink)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Eliano Pessa & Giuseppe Vitiello (2003). Quantum Noise, Entanglement and Chaos in the Quantum Field Theory of Mind/Brain States. Mind and Matter 1 (1):59-79.score: 144.0
    We review the dissipative quantum model of the brain and present recent developments related to the role of entanglement, quantum noise and chaos in the model.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Michele Caponigro & Enrico Giannetto (2012). Epistemic Vs Ontic Classification of Quantum Entangled States? Discusiones Filosóficas 13 (20):137 - 145.score: 144.0
    In this brief paper, starting from recent works, we analyze from conceptual point of view this basic question: can be the nature of quantum entangled states be interpreted ontologically or epistemologically? According to some works, the degrees of freedom (and the tool of quantum partitions) of quantum systems permit us to establish a possible classification between factorizable and entangled states. We suggest, that the "choice" of degree of freedom (or quantum partitions), even if mathematically justified introduces (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Rob Clifton & Hans Halvorson (2001). Entanglement and Open Systems in Algebraic Quantum Field Theory. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 32 (1):1-31.score: 144.0
    Entanglement has long been the subject of discussion by philosophers of quantum theory, and has recently come to play an essential role for physicists in their development of quantum information theory. In this paper we show how the formalism of algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT) provides a rigorous framework within which to analyse entanglement in the context of a fully relativistic formulation of quantum theory. What emerges from the analysis are new practical and theoretical (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Francesco De Martini (2011). Entanglement and Quantum Superposition of a Macroscopic-Macroscopic System. Foundations of Physics 41 (3):363-370.score: 144.0
    Two quantum Macro-states and their Macroscopic Quantum Superpositions (MQS) localized in two far apart, space-like separated sites can be non-locally correlated by any entangled couple of single-particles having interacted in the past. This novel “Macro-Macro” paradigm is investigated on the basis of a recent study on an entangled Micro-Macro system involving N≈105 particles. Crucial experimental issues as the violation of Bell’s inequalities by the Macro-Macro system are considered.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Walter von Lucado & H. Romer (2007). Synchronistic Phenomena as Entanglement Correlations in Generalized Quantum Theory. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (4):50-74.score: 144.0
    Synchronistic or psi phenomena are interpreted as entanglement correlations in a generalized quantum theory. From the principle that entanglement correlations cannot be used for transmitting information, we can deduce the decline effect, frequently observed in psi experiments, and we propose strategies for suppressing it and improving the visibility of psi effects. Some illustrative examples are discussed.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Giovanni Valente (2010). Can Entanglement Be Destroyed by Any Local Operation in Relativistic Quantum Field Theory? Philosophy of Science 77 (5):1029-1041.score: 144.0
    This article investigates the nature of entangled correlations in algebraic quantum field theory (AQFT). We define a notion of local disentanglement, expressing the possibility of destroying entanglement by means of local operations. Contrary to the case of ordinary quantum mechanics, local disentanglement cannot be achieved in general in relativistic quantum field theory. However, we show that if the split property holds, there exists a local operation that can destroy entanglement between spacelike-separated quantum field systems.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Chen-Pang Yeang (2011). Engineering Entanglement, Conceptualizing Quantum Information. Annals of Science 68 (3):325-350.score: 144.0
    Summary Proposed by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen (EPR) in 1935, the entangled state has played a central part in exploring the foundation of quantum mechanics. At the end of the twentieth century, however, some physicists and mathematicians set aside the epistemological debates associated with EPR and turned it from a philosophical puzzle into practical resources for information processing. This paper examines the origin of what is known as quantum information. Scientists had considered making quantum computers and employing (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. F. Herbut (2008). On EPR-Type Entanglement in the Experiments of Scully Et Al. I. The Micromaser Case and Delayed-Choice Quantum Erasure. Foundations of Physics 38 (11):1046-1064.score: 138.0
    Delayed-choice erasure is investigated in two-photon two-slit experiments that are generalizations of the micromaser experiment of Scully et al. (Nature 351:111–116, 1991). Applying quantum mechanics to the localization detector, it is shown that erasure with delayed choice in the sense of Scully, has an analogous structure as simple erasure. The description goes beyond probabilities. The EPR-type disentanglement, consisting in two mutually incompatible distant measurements, is used as a general framework in both parts of this study. Two simple coherence cases (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Patrick Suppes & Stephan Hartmann (2010). Entanglement, Upper Probabilities and Decoherence in Quantum Mechanics. In M. Suaráz et al (ed.), EPSA Philosophical Issues in the Sciences: Launch of the European Philosophy of Science Association. Springer. 93--103.score: 132.0
    Quantum mechanical entangled configurations of particles that do not satisfy Bell’s inequalities, or equivalently, do not have a joint probability distribution, are familiar in the foundational literature of quantum mechanics. Nonexistence of a joint probability measure for the correlations predicted by quantum mechanics is itself equivalent to the nonexistence of local hidden variables that account for the correlations (for a proof of this equivalence, see Suppes and Zanotti, 1981). From a philosophical standpoint it is natural to ask (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Diederik Aerts (2014). Quantum and Concept Combination, Entangled Measurements, and Prototype Theory. Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (1):129-137.score: 132.0
    We analyze the meaning of the violation of the marginal probability law for situations of correlation measurements where entanglement is identified. We show that for quantum theory applied to the cognitive realm such a violation does not lead to the type of problems commonly believed to occur in situations of quantum theory applied to the physical realm. We briefly situate our quantum approach for modeling concepts and their combinations with respect to the notions of “extension” and (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Karen Michelle Barad (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press.score: 132.0
  40. J. Bub (2000). Indeterminacy and Entanglement: The Challenge of Quantum Mechanics. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 51 (4):597-615.score: 126.0
    I explore the nature of the problem generated by the transition from classical to quantum mechanics, and I survey some of the different responses to this problem. I show briefly how recent work on quantum information over the past ten years has led to a shift of focus, in which the puzzling features of quantum mechanics are seen as a resource to be developed rather than a problem to be solved.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Gunter Mahler (2004). The Partitioned Quantum Universe: Entanglement and the Emergence of Functionality. Mind and Matter 2 (2):67-89.score: 126.0
    Given that the world as we perceive it appears to be predominantly classical, how can we stabilize quantum effects? Given the fundamental description of our world is quantum mechanical, how do classical phenomena emerge? Answers can be found from the analysis of the scaling properties of modular quantum systems with respect to a given level of description. It is argued that, depending on design, such partitioned quantum systems may support various functions. Despite their local appearance these (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Itamar Pitowsky, Range Theorems for Quantum Probability and Entanglement.score: 126.0
    We consider the set of all matrices of the form pij = tr[W (Ei ⊗ Fj)] where Ei, Fj are projections on a Hilbert space H, and W is some state on H ⊗ H. We derive the basic properties of this set, compare it with the classical range of probability, and note how its properties may be related to a geometric measures of entanglement.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Gregg Jaeger & Sahotra Sarkar (2003). Coherence, Entanglement, and Reductionist Explanation in Quantum Physics," . In A. Ashtekar et al (ed.), Revisiting the foundations of relativistic physics. 523--542.score: 126.0
    The scope and nature of reductionist explanation in quantum physics is analyzed, with special attention being paid to the situation in quantum physics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Eric Winsberg (2003). Quantum Life: Interaction, Entanglement, and Separation. Journal of Philosophy 100 (2):80 - 97.score: 122.0
    Violations of the Bell inequalities in EPR-Bohm type experiments have set the literature on the metaphysics of microscopic systems to flirting with some sort of metaphysical holism regarding spatially separated, entangled systems. The rationale for this behavior comes in two parts. The first part relies on the proof, due to Jon Jarrett [2] that the experimentally observed violations of the Bell inequalities entail violations of the conjunction of two probabilistic constraints. Jarrett called these two constraints locality and completeness. We prefer (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Travis Norsen (2011). Review of Alisa Bokulich, Gregg Jaeger (Eds.), Philosophy of Quantum Information and Entanglement. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (2).score: 120.0
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Trevor Pinch (2012). Pulling Apart the Quantum's Entanglement with the Counter Culture: How Fysiks Became Physics. [REVIEW] Metascience 21 (3):601-606.score: 120.0
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Lisa M. Dolling (2009). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. By Karen Barad. Hypatia 24 (1):212-218.score: 120.0
  48. H. Atmanspacher, H. Romer & H. Wallach (2006). Weak Quantum Theory: Formal Framework and Selected Applications. Weak Quantum Theory: Complementarity and Entanglement in Physics and Beyond. Foundations of Physics 32:379-406.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Robert S. Cohen, Michael Horne & John Stachel (eds.) (1997). Potentiality, Entanglement, and Passion-at-a-Distance: Quantum Mechanical Studies for Abner Shimony. Kluwer Academic Publishers.score: 120.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 999