Search results for 'reproduction' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Daniela Cutas & Lisa Bortolotti (2010). Natural Versus Assisted Reproduction. In Search of Fairness. Studies in Ethics, Law and Technology 4 (1).score: 18.0
    Whilst the choice of becoming a parent in the natural way is unregulated all over Europe (and proposals of regulation raise vehement objections), most European countries have (either legal or professional) regulations imposing criteria that people must satisfy if they wish to gain access to assisted reproduction and parenting. These criteria may include relationship status, age, sexual orientation, financial stability, health, and willingness to attend parenting classes. The existence of regulations in this area is largely accepted, and the objections (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Melissa Seymour Fahmy (2013). On Procreative Responsibility in Assisted and Collaborative Reproduction. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 16 (1):55-70.score: 18.0
    Abstract It is common practice to regard participants in assisted and collaborative reproduction (gamete donors, embryologists, fertility doctors, etc.) as simply providing a desired biological product or medical service. These agents are not procreators in the ordinary sense, nor do they stand in any kind of meaningful parental relation to the resulting offspring. This paper challenges the common view by defending a principle of procreative responsibility and then demonstrating that this standard applies as much to those who provide reproductive (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Marco Fabbri, Nicola Cellini, Monica Martoni, Lorenzo Tonetti & Vincenzo Natale (2013). The Mechanisms of Space‐Time Association: Comparing Motor and Perceptual Contributions in Time Reproduction. Cognitive Science 37 (4).score: 18.0
    The spatial-temporal association indicates that time is represented spatially along a left-to-right line. It is unclear whether the spatial-temporal association is mainly related to a perceptual or a motor component. In addition, the spatial-temporal association is not consistently found using a time reproduction task. Our rationale for this finding is that, classically, a non-lateralized button for performing the task has been used. Using two lateralized response buttons, the aim of the study was to find a spatial-temporal association in a (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Jacqueline A. Laing (2006). Artificial Reproduction, Blood Relatedness, and Human Identity. The Monist 89 (4):548-566.score: 18.0
    The article discusses questions on the significance of blood relatedness in the context of identity arguments about artificial reproduction (AR). Kinship, origins, and biological connections are significant to human beings. The author explains that family relationships bear on the identity of human beings. Moreover, she emphasizes that once these principles are neglected, it is possible to create people in ways that threaten significant human bonds and alienate people who are naturally related spelling loss, confusion and grief for them.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Carmel Shalev (2012). An Ethic of Care and Responsibility: Reflections on Third-Party Reproduction. Medicine Studies 3 (3):147-156.score: 18.0
    The rapid development of assisted reproduction technologies for the treatment of infertility appears to empower women through expanding their individual choice, but it is also creating new forms of suffering for them and their collaborators, especially in the context of transnational third-party reproduction. This paper explores the possibility of framing the ethical discourse around third-party reproduction by bringing attention to concerns of altruistic empathy for women who collaborate in the reproductive process, in addition to those of individualistic (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Isabel Karpin (2012). Perfecting Pregnancy: Law, Disability, and the Future of Reproduction. Cambridge University Press.score: 15.0
    Machine generated contents note: 1. Disability; 2. Risk; 3. Terminations; 4. De-selections; 5. Interpretations; 6. Futures.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Beatrice Ioan & Vasile Astarastoae (2013). Ethical and Legal Aspects in Medically Assisted Human Reproduction in Romania. Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 14 (2):4 - 13.score: 15.0
    Up to the present, there have not been any specific norms regarding medically assisted human reproduction in Romanian legislation. Due to this situation the general legislation regarding medical assistance (law no. 95/2006, regarding the Reform in Health Care System), the Penal and Civil law and the provisions of the Code of Deontology of the Romanian College of Physicians are applied to the field of medically assisted human reproduction. By analysing the ethical and legal conflicts regarding medically assisted human (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Catherine Mills (2011). Futures of Reproduction: Bioethics and Biopolitics. Springer.score: 14.0
    Issues in reproductive ethics, such as the capacity of parents to ‘choose children’, present challenges to philosophical ideas of freedom, responsibility and harm. This book responds to these challenges by proposing a new framework for thinking about the ethics of reproduction that emphasizes the ways that social norms affect decisions about who is born. The book provides clear and thorough discussions of some of the dominant problems in reproductive ethics - human enhancement and the notion of the normal, reproductive (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Shelley Day Sclater (ed.) (2009). Regulating Autonomy: Sex, Reproduction and Family. Hart.score: 14.0
    Intimacies and domestic lives -- Reproduction.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Lisa Bortolotti & Daniela Cutas (2009). Reproductive and Parental Autonomy: An Argument for Compulsory Parental Education. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 19 (ethics suppl.):5-14.score: 13.0
    In this paper we argue that society should make available reliable information about parenting to everybody from an early age. The reason why parental education is important (when offered in a comprehensive and systematic way) is that it can help young people understand better the responsibilities associated with reproduction, and the skills required for parenting. This would allow them to make more informed life-choices about reproduction and parenting, and exercise their autonomy with respect to these choices. We do (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Hallvard Lillehammer (2009). Reproduction, Partiality, and the Non-Identity Problem. In M. A. Roberts & D. T. Wasserman (eds.), Harming Future Persons.score: 12.0
    Much work in contemporary bioethics defends a broadly liberal view of human reproduction. I shall take this view to comprise (but not to be exhausted by) the following four claims.1 First, it is permissible both to reproduce and not to reproduce, either by traditional means or by means of assisted reproductive techniques such as IVF and genetic screening. Second, it is permissible either to reproduce or to adopt or otherwise foster an existing child to which one is not biologically (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Jacqueline A. Laing (2005). Artificial Reproduction, the 'Welfare Principle', and the Common Good. Medical Law Review 13:328-356.score: 12.0
    This article challenges the view most recently expounded by Emily Jackson that ‘decisional privacy’ ought to be respected in the realm of artificial reproduction (AR). On this view, it is considered an unjust infringement of individual liberty for the state to interfere with individual or group freedom artificially to produce a child. It is our contention that a proper evaluation of AR and of the relevance of welfare will be sensitive not only to the rights of ‘commissioning parties’ to (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Stellan Welin (2004). Reproductive Ectogenesis: The Third Era of Human Reproduction and Some Moral Consequences. Science and Engineering Ethics 10 (4).score: 12.0
    In a well known story Derek Parfit describes a disconnection between two entities that normally (in real life) travel together through space and time, namely your personal identity consisting of both mind and body. Realising the possibility of separation, even if it might never happen in real life, new questions arise that cast doubt on old solutions. In human reproduction, in real life, at present the fetus spends approximately nine months inside the pregnant woman. But, we might envisage other (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Anne Donchin (2011). In Whose Interest? Policy and Politics in Assisted Reproduction. Bioethics 25 (2):92-101.score: 12.0
    This paper interprets the British legislative process that initiated the first comprehensive national regulation of embryo research and fertility services and examines subsequent efforts to restrain the assisted reproduction industry. After describing and evaluating British regulatory measures, I consider successive failures to control the assisted reproduction industry in the US. I discuss disparities between UK and US regulatory initiatives and their bearing on regulation in other countries. Then I turn to the political and social structures in which the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. David S. Oderberg, Artificial Reproduction, the 'Welfare Principle', and the Common Good.score: 12.0
    This article challenges the view most recently expounded by Emily Jackson that ‘decisional privacy’ ought to be respected in the realm of artificial reproduction (AR). On this view, it is considered an unjust infringement of individual liberty for the state to interfere with individual or group freedom artificially to produce a child. It is our contention that a proper evaluation of AR and of the relevance of welfare will be sensitive not only to the rights of ‘commissioning parties’ to (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Ramani Leathard (2012). Book Review: Islam and New Kinship: Reproductive Technology and the Shariah in Lebanon (Fertility, Reproduction and Sexuality Series) . Morgan Clarke Berghahn Books. 262 Pages. Hardback. ISBN 978-1845454326. RRP: £50.00. [REVIEW] Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (2):247-248.score: 12.0
  17. Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta & Annemiek Richters (2008). Embodied Subjects and Fragmented Objects: Women's Bodies, Assisted Reproduction Technologies and the Right to Self-Determination. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4).score: 12.0
    This article focuses on the transformation of the female reproductive body with the use of assisted reproduction technologies under neo-liberal economic globalisation, wherein the ideology of trade without borders is central, as well as under liberal feminist ideals, wherein the right to self-determination is central. Two aspects of the body in western medicine—the fragmented body and the commodified body, and the integral relation between these two—are highlighted. This is done in order to analyse the implications of local and global (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Evelyn Fox Keller (1987). Reproduction and the Central Project of Evolutionary Theory. Biology and Philosophy 2 (4):383-396.score: 12.0
    In much of the discourse of evolutionary theory, reproduction is treated as an autonomous function of the individual organism — even in discussions of sexually reproducing organisms. In this paper, I examine some of the functions and consequences of such manifestly peculiar language. In particular, I suggest that it provides crucial support for the central project of evolutionary theory — namely that of locating causal efficacy in intrinsic properties of the individual organism. Furthermore, I argue that the language of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Hongxing Chen (2010). Reproduction, Familiarity, Love, and Humaneness: How Did Confucius Reveal “Humaneness”? Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5 (4):506-522.score: 12.0
    This article draws out the subtle connections among the various sorts of categories— sheng 生 (reproduction), qin 亲 (familiarity), ai 爱 (love), and ren 仁 (humaneness) —focusing on the following: Confucius found the original significance of reproduction to be sympathy between males and females, and upon further study he found it extended to the.affinity of blood relations, namely familiarity. From familiarity he came to understand love that one generates and has for people and things beyond one’s blood relations, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Matt James (2012). Book Review: Assisting Reproduction, Testing Genes: Global Encounters with New Biotechnologies. Daphna Birenbaum-Carmeli and Marcia C. Inhorn (Eds) Berghahn Books, 2009. 256 Pages. Hardback. ISBN 978-1845-456252. RRP: £58.00. [REVIEW] Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 16 (2):242-244.score: 12.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Anne Donchin (2009). Toward a Gender-Sensitive Assisted Reproduction Policy. Bioethics 23 (1):28-38.score: 12.0
    The recent case of the UK woman who lost her legal struggle to be impregnated with her own frozen embryos, raises critical issues about the meaning of reproductive autonomy and the scope of regulatory practices. I revisit this case within the context of contemporary debate about the moral and legal dimensions of assisted reproduction. I argue that the gender neutral context that frames discussion of regulatory practices is unjust unless it gives appropriate consideration to the different positions women and (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Stephen Gill & Isabella Bakker (2006). New Constitutionalism and the Social Reproduction of Caring Institutions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (1):35-57.score: 12.0
    This essay analyzes neo-liberal economic agreements and legal and political frameworks or what has been called the “new constitutionalism,” a governance framework that empowers market forces to reshape economic and social development worldwide. The article highlights some consequences of new constitutionalism for caring institutions specifically, and for what feminists call social reproduction more generally: the biological reproduction of the species; the reproduction of labor power; and the reproduction of social institutions and processes associated with the creation (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2004). A Woman's Choice? On Women, Assisted Reproduction and Social Coercion. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (1):81 - 90.score: 12.0
    This paper critically discusses an argument that is sometimes pressed into service in the ethical debate about the use of assisted reproduction. The argument runs roughly as follows: we should prevent women from using assisted reproduction techniques, because women who want to use the technology have been socially coerced into desiring children - and indeed have thereby been harmed by the patriarchal society in which they live. I call this the argument from coercion. Having clarified this argument, I (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Stephen Wilkinson (2010). Choosing Tomorrow's Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction. OUP Oxford.score: 12.0
    To what extent should parents be allowed to use reproductive technologies to determine the characteristics of their future children? And is there something morally wrong with parents who wish to do this? Choosing Tomorrow's Children provides answers to these (and related) questions. In particular, the book looks at issues raised by selective reproduction, the practice of choosing between different possible future persons by selecting or deselecting (for example) embryos, eggs, and sperm. -/- Wilkinson offers answers to questions including the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Mairi Levitt (2004). Assisted Reproduction: Managing an Unruly Technology. Health Care Analysis 12 (1):41-49.score: 12.0
    Technology is unruly because it operates in a social context where it is shaped by institutions, organisations and individuals in ways not envisaged when it was first developed. In the UK assisted reproductive technology has developed from strictly circumscribed beginnings as a treatment for infertility within the NHS, to a service which is more often offered by commercial clinics and purchased by clients who are not necessarily infertile. The article considers the process by which assisted reproductive technology has been created (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Rebecca Collins (2005). Posthumous Reproduction and the Presumption Against Consent in Cases of Death Caused by Sudden Trauma. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (4):431 – 442.score: 12.0
    The deceased's prior consent to posthumous reproduction is a common requirement in many common law jurisdictions. This paper critically evaluates four arguments advanced to justify the presumption against consent. It is argued that, in situations where death is caused by sudden trauma, not only is there inadequate justification for the presumption against consent, but there are good reasons to reverse the presumption. The article concludes that the precondition of prior consent may be inappropriate in these situations.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Katrien de Graeve (2010). The Limits of Intimate Citizenship: Reproduction of Difference in Flemish-Ethiopian 'Adoption Cultures'. Bioethics 24 (7):365-372.score: 12.0
    The concept of 'intimate citizenship' stresses the right of people to choose how they organize their personal lives and claim identities. Support and interest groups are seen as playing an important role in the pursuit of recognition for these intimate choices, by elaborating visible and positive cultures that invade broader public spheres. Most studies on intimate citizenship take into consideration the exclusions these groups encounter when negotiating their differences with society at large. However, much less attention is paid to the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Gavril Acălugăriţei (1986). Classification of Types of Ontogenetic Reproduction. Acta Biotheoretica 35 (1-2).score: 12.0
    The object of this paper is to present an original classification of ontogenetic reproduction. The main general criterion used is the degree and type of phylogenetic differentiation. In relation to this criterion, criteria are given for the classification of the fundamental types of ontogenetic reproduction and for the classification of the types of ontogenetic generation cycles. Between the fundamental types of ontogenetic reproduction and the types of ontogenetic generation cycles there is a hierarchical relationship which shows that (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Pierre Auger, Ali Moussaoui & Gauthier Sallet (forthcoming). Basic Reproduction Ratio for a Fishery Model in a Patchy Environment. Acta Biotheoretica.score: 12.0
    Abstract We present a dynamical model of a multi-site fishery. The fish stock is located on a discrete set of fish habitats where it is catched by the fishing fleet. We assume that fishes remain on fishing habitats while the fishing vessels can move at a fast time scale to visit the different fishing sites. We use the existence of two time scales to reduce the dimension of the model : we build an aggregated model considering the habitat fish densities (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Vern Baxter & A. V. Margavio (2011). Honor, Self and Social Reproduction. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (2):121-142.score: 12.0
    Honor is a difficult field of inquiry that deserves systematic attention from social scientists. Honor is an internalized concern for recognition and approval that links reputation with conduct and helps sustain existing patterns of social selection and evaluation. The paper argues that scholars are remiss that consider the field of honor obsolete or a residual category left over from the transition to modern forms of social organization. A modern conception of honor is identified in the relationship of a reflexive self (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Etienne Kouokam, Pierre Auger, Hassan Hbid & Maurice Tchuente (forthcoming). Effect of the Number of Patches in a Multi-Patch SIRS Model with Fast Migration on the Basic Reproduction Rate. Acta Biotheoretica.score: 12.0
    We consider a two-patch epidemiological system where individuals can move from one patch to another, and local interactions between the individuals within a patch are governed by the classical SIRS model. When the time-scale associated with migration is much smaller than the time-scale associated with infection, aggregation methods can be used to simplify the initial complete model formulated as a system of ordinary differential equations. Analysis of the aggregated model then shows that the two-patch basic reproduction rate is smaller (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Alexander R. Cohen (2007). Truly Human Reproduction. Journal of Philosophical Research 32:305-313.score: 12.0
    For two million years, members of Homo sapiens (and the species from which it emerged) have shaped to their purpose almost everything they found in nature. Yet we are still reproducing by sex. This is a poor method of conceiving human beings, because it surrenders many of the future child’s characteristics to luck. Both parents and children are better off the more parents control their children’s genotypes. The emerging technologies that enable this do not reduce free will and will not (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Norman M. Ford (2012). Catholicism and Human Reproduction: An Historical Overview. Australasian Catholic Record, The 89 (1):49.score: 12.0
    Ford, Norman M Throughout history Catholics held the commonly accepted views of the times regarding human reproduction, and these views changed as advances were made in scientific knowledge. Hence, it would be best to begin with Aristotle's views on human reproduction.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Samuel Gorovitz (1985). Engineering Human Reproduction: A Challenge to Public Policy. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 10 (3):267-274.score: 12.0
    New prospects for technologically aided human reproduction require the development of a public policy concerning the setting of limits to reproductive autonomy and to research on human embryos. Previous American efforts to clarify policy on such matters have been ignored by the executive branch; there is a need for Congressional action to initiate the requisite processes of debate and policy formation. Keywords: human reproduction, public policy, persons, in vitro fertilization, embryo transfer, reproductive autonomy CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us What's this?
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Thomas Søbirk Petersen (2004). A Woman's Choice? – On Women, Assisted Reproduction and Social Coercion. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 7 (1):81-90.score: 12.0
    This paper critically discusses an argument that is sometimes pressed into service in the ethical debate about the use of assisted reproduction. The argument runs roughly as follows: we should prevent women from using assisted reproduction techniques, because women who want to use the technology have been socially coerced into desiring children - and indeed have thereby been harmed by the patriarchal society in which they live. I call this the argument from coercion. Having clarified this argument, I (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Margrit Shildrick (2004). Reconfiguring the Bioethics of Reproduction. Philosophy in the Contemporary World 11 (1):77-85.score: 12.0
    The paper contends that, despite critiquing certain aspects of modernist thought feminist bioethics has become stuck in its own inadequate paradigms that pay insufficient attention to either the theoretical insights of postmodernism, or to the capacities of biotechnology in the postmodern era to disrupt prior certainties. In the face of an incalculable expansion of both theoretical and material possibilities, feminist bioethicists working in the field of reproduction have remained largely unwilling to reconfigure notions such as embodiment, subjectivity, agency, and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Amanda R. Clarke (2011). Beyond Reproduction: Women's Health, Activism, and Public Policy. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2).score: 12.0
    In the current political climate, understanding women’s health is necessary to achieve progressive and equitable health care reform. Women access the healthcare system more frequently and in greater numbers than men, and are more likely to vote at the polls.1 Yet politicians, corporations, activists, and patients continue to disagree on the scope and definition of women’s health. In her book Beyond Reproduction: Women’s Health, Activism, and Public Policy, Karen L. Baird offers a retrospective analysis of the women’s health movement (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Patrizia Calefato (2009). Language in Social Reproduction. Sign Systems Studies 37 (1-2):43-80.score: 12.0
    This paper focuses on the semiotic foundations of sociolinguistics. Starting from the definition of “sociolinguistics” given by the philosopher Adam Schaff, the paper examines in particular the notion of “critical sociolinguistics” as theorized by the Italian semiotician Ferruccio Rossi-Landi. The basis of the social dimension of language are to be found in what Rossi-Landi calls “social reproduction” which regards both verbal and non-verbal signs. Saussure’s notionof langue can be considered in this way, with reference not only to his Course (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Michael Glassman (2001). Replication or Reproduction?: Symbiogenesis as an Alternative Theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (3):537-538.score: 12.0
    This commentary takes issue with the idea that replication is a “fundamental element” in natural selection. Such an assumption is based on a traditional, mechanistic view of evolution. A symbiogenetic theory of evolution offers an alternative to traditional theories, emphasizing reproduction and qualitative development rather than replication and quantitative development. The issues raised by the symbiogenetic alternative may be extended to discussions of behavioral development.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. J. T. Manning & D. P. E. Dickson (1986). Environmental Change, Mutational Load and the Advantage of Sexual Reproduction. Acta Biotheoretica 35 (3).score: 12.0
    There is evidence that asexual reproduction has a long-term disadvantage when compared to sexual reproduction. This disadvantage is usually assumed to arise from the more efficient incorporation of advantageous mutations by sexual populations. We consider here the effect on asexual and sexual populations of changes in the fitness of harmful mutations. It is shown that the re-establishment of equilibrium following environmental change is generally faster in sexual populations, and that the mutational load experienced by the sexual population can (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Carolyn McLeod (2002). Self-Trust and Reproductive Autonomy. MIT Press.score: 10.0
    The power of new medical technologies, the cultural authority of physicians, and the gendered power dynamics of many patient-physician relationships can all inhibit women's reproductive freedom. Often these factors interfere with women's ability to trust themselves to choose and act in ways that are consistent with their own goals and values. In this book Carolyn McLeod introduces to the reproductive ethics literature the idea that in reproductive health care women's self-trust can be undermined in ways that threaten their autonomy. Understanding (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Lisa Bortolotti & John Harris (2005). Embryos and Eagles: Symbolic Value in Research and Reproduction. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 15 (01).score: 10.0
    On both sides of the debate on the use of embryos in stem cell research, and in reproductive technologies more generally, rhetoric and symbolic images have been evoked to influence public opinion. Human embryos themselves are described as either “very small human beings” or “small clusters of cells.” The intentions behind the use of these phrases are clear. One description suggests that embryos are already members of our community and share with us a right to life or at least respectful (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Anne Pollock (2003). Complicating Power in High-Tech Reproduction: Narratives of Anonymous Paid Egg Donors. Journal of Medical Humanities 24 (3/4):241-263.score: 10.0
    This paper is informed by my own participant observation and uses my own ethnography which included conducting in-depth interviews with anonymous paid egg donors and observing a listserv for women considering, pursuing, or having completed egg donation, to illustrate the way that power operates at this particular site of the reproductive center in postmodernity. After outlining who the consumers and providers of eggs are, I will use Foucault's concepts of biopower, disciplinary power, and normativity to describe how anonymous paid egg (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Denys deCatanzaro & Emily Spironello (1998). Of Mice and Men: Androgen Dynamics in Dominance and Reproduction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (3):371-371.score: 10.0
    In the animal literature, the concept of dominance usually links status in intermale encounters with differential reproductive success. Mazur & Booth effectively review the human literature correlating testosterone with intermale competition, but more profound questions relating this to male–female dynamics have yet to be addressed in research with humans.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Peter J. Richersonb, Influences on Communication About Reproduction: The Cultural Evolution of Low Fertility.score: 10.0
    The cultural norms of traditional societies encourage behavior that is consistent with maximizing reproductive success but those of modern post-demographic transition societies do not. Newson et al (2005) proposed that this might be because interaction between kin is relatively less frequent in modern social networks. Assuming that people’s evaluations of reproductive decisions are influenced by a desire to increase their inclusive fitness, they will be inclined to prefer their kin to make fitness-enhancing choices. Such a preference will encourage the emergence (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Mark Greene (2009). Choosing Future People: Reproductive Technologies and Identity. In Vardit Ravitsky, Autumn Fiester & Arthur L. Caplan (eds.), The Penn Center Guide to Bioethics. Springer Publishing Company.score: 10.0
    Reproductive technologies do not allow us to choose future people, but they do change who will exist. Confusion arises because of the different senses in which ”identity’ is used in ethical debate. I distinguish qualitative, cultural, and numerical identity. Reproductive choices do impact the qualitative features of children in ways that affect wellbeing, both directly and indirectly via cultural identification. I explain how the nonidentity problem makes it difficult to say what, if anything, is wrong with risky reproductive choices, and (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Jacqueline A. Laing (2000). New Reproductive Technologies Are Morally Problematic. In James Torr (ed.), Medical Ethics. Greenhaven Press.score: 10.0
    A short article examining the problems of the fertility industry, commodifying human life and allowing unaccountable third parties to create children in ways that undermine their identity by way of donor conception, human cloning and artificial reproductive techniques.
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Christine Overall (1987). Ethics and Human Reproduction: A Feminist Analysis. Allen & Unwin.score: 10.0
    This book should be essential reading for anyone interested in the new reproductive technologies, biomedical ethics, and women's health.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Debra Satz, Feminist Perspectives on Reproduction and the Family. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.score: 9.0
  50. Cathryn Bailey (2007). We Are What We Eat: Feminist Vegetarianism and the Reproduction of Racial Identity. Hypatia 22 (2):39-59.score: 9.0
    : In this article, Bailey analyzes the relationship between ethical vegetarianism (or the claim that ethical vegetarianism is morally right for all people) and white racism (the claim that white solipsistic and possibly white privileged ethical claims are imperialistically or insensitively universalized over less privileged human lives). This plays out in the dreaded comparison of animals with people of color and Jews as exemplified in the PETA campaign and the need for human identification (or solidarity) with animals in ethical vegetarianism. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. Michael Lynch (1991). Science in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction: Moral and Epistemic Relations Between Diagrams and Photographs. Biology and Philosophy 6 (2):205-226.score: 9.0
    Sociologists, philosophers and historians of science are gradually recognizing the importance of visual representation. This is part of a more general movement away from a theory-centric view of science and towards an interest in practical aspects of observation and experimentation. Rather than treating science as a matter of demonstrating the logical connection between theoretical and empirical statements, an increasing number of investigations are examining how scientists compose and use diagrams, graphs, photographs, micrographs, maps, charts, and related visual displays. This paper (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. Nick Peim (2007). Walter Benjamin in the Age of Digital Reproduction: Aura in Education: A Rereading of 'the Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction'. Journal of Philosophy of Education 41 (3):363–380.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. Alison Bailey & Jacquelyn N. Zita (2007). The Reproduction of Whiteness: Race and the Regulation of the Gendered Body. Hypatia 22 (2):vii-xv.score: 9.0
    Historically critical reflection on whiteness in the United States has been a long-standing practice in slave folklore and in Mexican resistance to colonialism, Asian American struggles against exploitation and containment, and Native American stories of contact with European colonizers. Drawing from this legacy and from the disturbing silence on "whiteness" in postsecondary institutions, critical whiteness scholarship has emerged in the past two decades in U.S. academies in a variety of disciplines. A small number of philosophers, critical race theorists, postcolonial theorists, (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  54. John Harris (2004). Sexual Reproduction Is a Survival Lottery. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (01).score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  55. Bouchard Frédéric (2011). Darwinism Without Populations: A More Inclusive Understanding of the “Survival of the Fittest”. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (1):106-114.score: 9.0
    Following Wallace’s suggestion, Darwin framed his theory using Spencer’s expression “survival of the fittest”. Since then, fitness occupies a significant place in the conventional understanding of Darwinism, even though the explicit meaning of the term ‘fitness’ is rarely stated. In this paper I examine some of the different roles that fitness has played in the development of the theory. Whereas the meaning of fitness was originally understood in ecological terms, it took a statistical turn in terms of reproductive success throughout (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  56. Claudia Jáuregui (2006). Auto-Affection and Synthesis of Reproduction. Kant-Studien 97 (3):369-381.score: 9.0
    The Kantian notion of ‘affection’ is indeed problematic and obscure. In so far as the subject is finite and does not create the object of knowledge, the latter must always be somehow given. The passive faculty of sensibility makes it possible for the object to appear. But this receptive character of the subject correlates to some affection. Something affects us, and our sensibility receives this affection under the pure forms of space and time. The question that immediately arises is what (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  57. David Archard (2011). Choosing Tomorrow's Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction – By Stephen Wilkinson. Journal of Applied Philosophy 28 (1):101-104.score: 9.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  58. Sophia M. Connell (2000). Aristotle and Galen on Sex Difference and Reproduction: A New Approach to an Ancient Rivalry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (3):405-427.score: 9.0
  59. Julian Savulescu & John Harris (2004). The Creation Lottery: Final Lessons From Natural Reproduction: Why Those Who Accept Natural Reproduction Should Accept Cloning and Other Frankenstein Reproductive Technologies. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (01).score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  60. Rebecca Bennett (2008). Is Reproduction Women's Business? How Should We Regulate Regarding Stored Embryos, Posthumous Pregnancy, Ectogenesis and Male Pregnancy? Studies in Ethics, Law, and Technology 2 (3).score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  61. Marc Ereshefsky & Makmiller Pedroso (2013). Biological Individuality: The Case of Biofilms. Biology and Philosophy 28 (2):331-349.score: 9.0
    This paper examines David Hull’s and Peter Godfrey-Smith’s accounts of biological individuality using the case of biofilms. Biofilms fail standard criteria for individuality, such as having reproductive bottlenecks and forming parent-offspring lineages. Nevertheless, biofilms are good candidates for individuals. The nature of biofilms shows that Godfrey-Smith’s account of individuality, with its reliance on reproduction, is too restrictive. Hull’s interactor notion of individuality better captures biofilms, and we argue that it offers a better account of biological individuality. However, Hull’s notion (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  62. Michael Wreen (1985). The Restoration and Reproduction of Works of Art. Dialogue 24 (01):91-.score: 9.0
    In 1972, one of Michelangelo's earliest and best-known Pietàs was attacked by an evident lunatic. Fifteen times it was struck with a ninepound hammer; the Madonna's arm was broken in several places, her nose was knocked off, and her eye and veil were badly chipped. Immediately after the assault, and before knowing precisely what was needed to be replaced, the Director of the Vatican Museum, Redig de Campos, decided that integral restoration was called for.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  63. T. V. Barchunova (2003). The Selfish Gender, or the Reproduction of Gender Asymmetry in Gender Studies. Studies in East European Thought 55 (1):3-25.score: 9.0
    Gender discrimination can be overt anddeliberate. It can be covert and indeliberate.In the latter case it is called `asymmetry'.The gender studies community aims to reveal andeliminate any forms of gender asymmetry.However, insufficient methodological andtheoretical reflection implies the reproductionof gender asymmetry throughout genderstudies.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  64. Terrence W. Deacon (2006). Reciprocal Linkage Between Self-Organizing Processes is Sufficient for Self-Reproduction and Evolvability. Biological Theory 1 (2):136-149.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  65. Thomas Teufel (2011). Wholes That Cause Their Parts: Organic Self-Reproduction and the Reality of Biological Teleology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 42 (2):252-260.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  66. Andrew Coles (1995). Biomedical Models of Reproduction in the Fifth Century BC and Aristotle's Generation of Animals. Phronesis 40 (1):48-88.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  67. Lane Beckes & Jeffry A. Simpson (2009). Attachment, Reproduction, and Life History Trade-Offs: A Broader View of Human Mating. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32 (1):23-24.score: 9.0
  68. D. Browne (2011). Choosing Tomorrow's Children: The Ethics of Selective Reproduction * By Stephen Wilkinson. Analysis 71 (3):605-607.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  69. Y. Denier (2010). From Brute Luck to Option Luck? On Genetics, Justice, and Moral Responsibility in Reproduction. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (2):101-129.score: 9.0
    The structure of our ethical experience depends, crucially, on a fundamental distinction between what we are responsible for doing or deciding and what is given to us. As such, the boundary between chance and choice is the spine of our conventional morality, and any serious shift in that boundary is thoroughly dislocating. Against this background, I analyze the way in which techniques of prenatal genetic diagnosis (PGD) pose such a fundamental challenge to our conventional ideas of justice and moral responsibility. (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  70. Molly Havard & David Magnus (2011). Sexless Reproduction: A Status Symbol. American Journal of Bioethics 11 (3):1-1.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  71. John C. Waller (2001). Ideas of Heredity, Reproduction and Eugenics in Britain, 1800–1875. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (3):457-489.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  72. M. S. (2000). Aristotle and Galen on Sex Difference and Reproduction: A New Approach to an Ancient Rivalry. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 31 (3):405-427.score: 9.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  73. LeRoy Walters (1996). Current and Future Issues in Assisted Reproduction. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (4):383-387.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  74. Susan M. Wolf (ed.) (1996). Feminism & Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction. Oxford University Press.score: 9.0
    Bioethics has paid surprisingly little attention to the special problems faced by women and to feminist analyses of current health care issues other than ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  75. John J. Haldane (1992). An Embarrassing Question About Reproduction. Philosophical Psychology 5 (4):427-431.score: 9.0
    Standard objections to dualism focus on problems of individuation: what, in the absence of matter, serves to diversify immaterial items? and interaction: how can material and immaterial elements causally affect one another? Given certain ways of conceiving mental phenomena and causation, it is not obvious that one cannot reply to these objections. However, a different kind of difficulty comes into view when one considers the question of the origin of the mental. Here attention is directed upon the case of intentionality. (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  76. Patrick Maynard (1989). Talbot's Technologies: Photographic Depiction, Detection, and Reproduction. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47 (3):263-276.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  77. David Robert Cole (2010). The Reproduction of Philosophical Bodies in Education with Language. Educational Philosophy and Theory 42 (8):816-829.score: 9.0
    This paper articulates a feminist poststructural philosophy of education by combining the work of Luce Irigaray and Michel Foucault. This acts as an underpinning for a philosophy of desire (McWilliam, 1999) in education, or as a minor philosophy of education where multiple movements of bodies are enacted through theoretical methodologies and research. These methods include qualitative analysis and critical discourse analysis; where the conjunction Irigaray-Foucault is a paradigm for dealing with educational phenomena. It is also a rigorous materialism (Braidotti, 2005) (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  78. Joachim Dagg (2012). The Paradox of Sexual Reproduction and the Levels of Selection: Can Sociobiology Shed a Light? Philosophy and Theory in Biology 4.score: 9.0
    The group selection controversy largely focuses on altruism (e.g., Wilson 1983; Lloyd 2001; Shavit 2004; Okasha 2006, 173ff; Borrello 2010; Leigh 2010; Rosas 2010; Hamilton and Dimond in press). Multilevel selection theory is a resolution of this controversy. Whereas kin selection partitions inclusive fitness into direct and indirect components (via influencing the replication of copies of genes in other individuals), multilevel selection considers within-group and between-group components of fitness (Gardner et al. 2011; Lion et al. 2011). Two scenarios of multilevel (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  79. Michael D. Bayles (1977). Genetic Equality and Freedom of Reproduction: A Philosophical Survey. Journal of Value Inquiry 11 (3):186-207.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  80. Daniela Cutas (2008). On a Romanian Attempt to Legislate on Medically Assisted Human Reproduction. Bioethics 22 (1):56–63.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  81. Jacques Testart (1995). The New Eugenics and Medicalized Reproduction. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4 (03):304-.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  82. Diane B. Paul & Benjamin Day (2008). John Stuart Mill, Innate Differences, and the Regulation of Reproduction. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 39 (2):222-231.score: 9.0
  83. Justin E. H. Smith (ed.) (2006). The Problem of Animal Generation in Early Modern Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.score: 9.0
    This book examines the early modern science of generation, which included the study of animal conception, heredity, and fetal development. Analyzing how it influenced the contemporary treatment of traditional philosophical questions, it also demonstrates how philosophical presuppositions about mechanism, substance, and cause informed the interpretations offered by those conducting empirical research on animal reproduction. Composed of cutting-edge essays written by an international team of leading scholars, the book offers a fresh perspective on some of the basic problems in early (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  84. L. Michelle Baker (2008). Before Reproduction: The Distortion of Generation. Philosophia 36 (3):299-312.score: 9.0
    Jean Baudrillard has posited a theory of ‘the precession of simulacra’, arguing that it is no longer possible to tell the difference between an image and the meaning it purports to represent because technology allows the image to precede its meaning. Christa Wolf, while researching Cassandra: A Novel and Four Essays (1984), traveled to Greece and discovered the ways in which language in the rational, Western model of civilization has been distorted. Both Baudrillard and Wolf are disturbed by the ways (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  85. Paul Draper (1991). Hume's Reproduction Parody of the Design Argument. History of Philosophy Quarterly 8 (2):135 - 148.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  86. Lucy Green (2005). Musical Meaning and Social Reproduction: A Case for Retrieving Autonomy. Educational Philosophy and Theory 37 (1):77–92.score: 9.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  87. L. Bernier (2004). Reproductive and Therapeutic Cloning, Germline Therapy, and Purchase of Gametes and Embryos: Comments on Canadian Legislation Governing Reproduction Technologies. Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (6):527-532.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  88. John A. Robertson (1988). Procreative Liberty and the State's Burden of Proof in Regulating Noncoital Reproduction. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 16 (1-2):18-26.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  89. Benjamin Humphrey Smart (1842/2004). Beginnings of a New School of Metaphysics: A Facsimile Reproduction with an Introduction by Dino Buzzetti ; with Early Reviews of the Book and B.H. Smart's 'a Letter to Dr. Whately'. [REVIEW] Scholars' Fasimiles & Reprints.score: 9.0
  90. Stuart J. Murray (2007). Care and the Self: Biotechnology, Reproduction, and the Good Life. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 2 (1):6-.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  91. Leslie Bender (1997). Feminism & Bioethics: Beyond Reproduction. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 25 (1):58-61.score: 9.0
  92. C. J. (2001). Ideas of Heredity, Reproduction and Eugenics in Britain, 1800-1875. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C 32 (3):457-489.score: 9.0
    In this paper I begin by arguing that there are significant intellectual and normative continuities between pre-Victorian hereditarianism and later Victorian eugenical ideologies. Notions of mental heredity and of the dangers of transmitting hereditary 'taints' were already serious concerns among medical practitioners and laymen in the early nineteenth century. I then show how the Victorian period witnessed an increasing tendency for these traditional concerns about hereditary transmission and the integrity of bloodlines to be projected onto the level of national health. (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  93. R. Ruyer (1964). The Mystery of Reproduction and the Limits of Automatism. Diogenes 12 (48):53-69.score: 9.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  94. Anita LaFrance Allen (1997). Book Review: Joan Callahan. Reproduction, Ethics, and the Law. Bloomington, In: Indiana University Press, 1995 and Laura Purdy. Reproducing Persons: Issues in Feminist Bioethics. And Kathy Rudy. Beyond Pro-Life and Pro-Choice. [REVIEW] Hypatia 12 (4):202-211.score: 9.0
  95. R. R. Baker & G. A. Parker (1973). The Origin and Evolution of Sexual Reproduction Up to the Evolution of the Male-Female Phenomenon. Acta Biotheoretica 22 (2).score: 9.0
  96. Barbara Stock (2001). John Harris and Soren Holm, Eds., The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice, and Regulation:The Future of Human Reproduction: Ethics, Choice, and Regulation. Ethics 112 (1):159-161.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  97. Richard A. McCormick (1996). Human Reproduction: Dominion and Limits. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (4):387-392.score: 9.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  98. Ingmar Persson & Julian Savulescu (2009). Actualizable Potential, Reproduction, and Embryo Research: Bringing Embryos Into Existence for Different Purposes or Not at All. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 19 (01):51-.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  99. B. Solberg (2009). Getting Beyond the Welfare of the Child in Assisted Reproduction. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (6):373-376.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  100. V. Fineschi (2005). The New Italian Law on Assisted Reproduction Technology (Law 40/2004). Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (9):536-539.score: 9.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 100 / 1000