10 found
Sort by:
Disambiguations:
Robin O. Andreasen [9]Robin Andreasen [1]
  1. Robin O. Andreasen (2008). The Concept of Race in Medicine. In Michael Ruse (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology. Oxford University Press.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Christa Acampora, Anita Allen, Andrew Altman, Paul Anand, Scott Anderson, Robin Andreasen, Scott Arnold, Birmingham Elizabeth Ashford, Kim Atkins & Ludvig Beckman (2007). Recognition of Reviewers. Journal of Social Philosophy 38 (4):507-510.
  3. Robin O. Andreasen (2007). Biological Conceptions of Race. In Mohan Matthen & Christopher Stephens (eds.), Philosophy of Biology. Elsevier. 455--481.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Robin O. Andreasen (2005). Institutional Sexism. Journal of Philosophical Research 30 (Supplement):147-163.
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Robin O. Andreasen (2005). The Meaning of 'Race'. Journal of Philosophy 102 (2):94 - 106.
  6. Ann E. Cudd & Robin O. Andreasen (eds.) (2005). Feminist Theory: A Philosophical Anthology. Blackwell Pub..
  7. Robin O. Andreasen (2004). The Cladistic Race Concept: A Defense. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 19 (3):425-442.
    Many contemporary race scholars reject the biological reality of race.Elsewhere I have argued that they have been too quick to do so. Part ofthe reason is that they have overlooked the possibility that races canbe defined cladistically. Since the publication of the cladistic raceconcept, a number of questions and objections have been raised. My aimin this paper is to address these objections.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Robin O. Andreasen & Milo J. Aukerman (2002). The Human Genome Project: A Reply to Rosenberg. [REVIEW] Biology and Philosophy 17 (5):673-678.
    In this paper we discuss the scientific value of the human genome project. To what extent is the data obtained by sequencing the entire human genome useful in the gene dicovery process? Responding to Alex Rosenberg' skepticism about the value of such data, we maintain that brute sequence data is much more useful than he suggests.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Robin O. Andreasen (2000). Race: Biological Reality or Social Construct? Philosophy of Science 67 (3):666.
    Race was once thought to be a real biological kind. Today the dominant view is that objective biological races don't exist. I challenge the trend to reject the biological reality of race by arguing that cladism (a school of classification that individuates taxa by appeal to common ancestry) provides a new way to define race biologically. I also reconcile the proposed biological conception with constructivist theories about race. Most constructivists assume that biological realism and social constructivism are incompatible views about (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Robin O. Andreasen (1998). A New Perspective on the Race Debate. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (2):199-225.
    In the ongoing debate concerning the nature of human racial categories, there is a trend to reject the biological reality of race in favour of the view that races are social constructs. At work here is the assumption that biological reality and social constructivism are incompatible. I oppose the trend and the assumption by arguing that cladism, in conjunction with current work in human evolution, provides a new way to define race biologically. Defining race in this way makes sense when (...)
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation