Search results for 'science and religion' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
See also:
  1. Massimo Pigliucci (2014). 5 Questions on Science & Religion. In Gregg D. Caruso (ed.), 5 Questions on Science & Religion. Automatic Press. 163-170.score: 264.0
    Are science and religion compatible when it comes to understanding cosmology (the origin of the universe), biology (the origin of life and of the human species), ethics, and the human mind (minds, brains, souls, and free will)? Do science and religion occupy non-overlapping magisteria? Is Intelligent Design a scientific theory? How do the various faith traditions view the relationship between science and religion? What, if any, are the limits of scientific explanation? What are the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Graham Oppy (2012). Science, Religion, and Infinity. In The Blackwell Companion to Science and Christianity. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. 430-440.score: 240.0
    This chapter contains sections titled: * Brief History * How We Talk * Science and Infinity * Religion and Infinity * Concluding Remarks * Notes * References * Further Reading.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. George F. R. Ellis (2006). Physics, Complexity, and the Science-Religion Debate. In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oup Oxford. 751-766.score: 222.0
    Accession Number: ATLA0001712277; Hosting Book Page Citation: p 751-766.; Language(s): English; General Note: Bibliography: p 765-766.; Issued by ATLA: 20130825; Publication Type: Essay.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Mark Vernon (2007). Science, Religion, and the Meaning of Life. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 222.0
    Have evolution, science and the trappings of the modern world killed off God irrevocably? And what do we lose if we choose not to believe in him? From Newton and Descartes to Darwin and the discovery of the genome, religion has been pushed back further and further while science has gained ground. But what fills the void that religion leaves behind? This book is an attempt to look at these questions and to suggest a third way (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Del Ratzsch (2010). The Alleged Demise of Religion: Greatly Exaggerated Reports From the Science/Religion €œWars”. In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. 69--84.score: 222.0
    This chapter contains sections titled: * I Refutation: some preliminaries * II Foundations – Deep Conflict? * III Epistemic Undertows: Dissolving Rationality * IV Conflicting Mindsets * V Historical Erosion * VII Conflict and Rational Justification * VII Conclusion * Acknowledgments * Notes.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Kelly James Clark (2010). Reformed Epistemology and the Cognitive Science of Religion. In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. 500--513.score: 216.0
    This chapter contains sections titled: * Introduction * The Cognitive Science of Religion * The Internal Witness: The Sensus Divinitatis * Reformed Epistemology * Reformed Epistemology and Cognitive Science * Obstinacy in Belief * The External Witness: The Order of the Cosmos * The External Witness and the Cognitive Science of Religion * Conclusion * Notes * Bibliography.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Peter B. Todd (ed.) (2012). The Individuation of God:Integrating Science and Religion. Chiron Publications.score: 204.0
    Todd argues for the integration of science and religion to form a new paradigm for the third millennium. He counters both the arguments made by fundamentalist Christians against science and the rejection of religion by the New Atheists, in particular Richard Dawkins and his followers. Drawing on the work of scientists, psychologists, philosophers, and theologians, Todd challenges the materialistic reductionism of our age and offers an alternative grounded in the visionary work taking place in a wide (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. James H. Fetzer (2011). Evolution and Atheism: Has Griffin Reconciled Science and Religion? Synthese 178 (2):381 - 396.score: 204.0
    The distinguished theologian, David Ray Griffin, has advanced a set of thirteen theses intended to characterize (what he calls) "Neo-Darwinism" and which he contrasts with "Intelligent Design". Griffin maintains that Neo-Darwinism is "atheistic" in forgoing a creator but suggests that, by adopting a more modest scientific naturalism and embracing a more naturalistic theology, it is possible to find "a third way" that reconciles religion and science. The considerations adduced here suggest that Griffin has promised more than he can (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. K. D. Gangrade (2005). Concept of Truth in Science and Religion. Concept Pub. Co..score: 204.0
    Drawing Heavily On The Writings Of Professor D.S. Kothari And Mahatma Gandhi, This Book Analyses The Concept Of Truth In Science And Religion.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Paul Howard Ellson (2006). The Beautiful Union of Science, Philosophy, and Religion. Aasb Media.score: 204.0
    Humankind : a limited company? -- From volume to point: 1. Philosophy, 2. Religion -- Science : specialised but not special -- Cosmic hierarchies -- Consciousness -- Cognition -- In theory -- Back to Genesis -- The beautiful union.
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Massimo Pigliucci (2013). When Science Studies Religion: Six Philosophy Lessons for Science Classes. Science and Education 22 (1):49-67.score: 198.0
    It is an unfortunate fact of academic life that there is a sharp divide between science and philosophy, with scientists often being openly dismissive of philosophy, and philosophers being equally contemptuous of the naivete ́ of scientists when it comes to the philosophical underpinnings of their own discipline. In this paper I explore the possibility of reducing the distance between the two sides by introducing science students to some interesting philosophical aspects of research in evolutionary biology, using biological (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Emile Boutroux (1909/1970). Science & Religion in Contemporary Philosophy. Port Washington, N.Y.,Kennikat Press.score: 198.0
  13. Philip Clayton (2014). The Fruits of Pluralism: A Vision for the Next Seven Years in Religion/Science. Zygon 49 (2):430-442.score: 198.0
    This article offers a vision for work at the intersection of science and religion over the coming seven years. Because predictions are inherently risky and are more often than not false, the text first offers an assessment of the current state of the science-religion discussion and a quick survey of the last 50 years of work in this field. The implications of the six features of this vision for the future of the field are then presented (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Holmes Rolston (1987/2006). Science & Religion: A Critical Survey. Templeton Foundation Press.score: 198.0
    This acclaimed book is back in print with a new introduction by its award-winning author.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Alvin Plantinga (2010). Science and Religion: Why Does the Debate Continue? In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. 299--316.score: 198.0
    This chapter contains sections titled: * 1 Science and Secularism * 2 Evolution * Acknowledgment * Notes * References.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Alan Padgett (2010). Overcoming the Problem of Induction: Science and Religion as Ways of Knowing. In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. 862--883.score: 198.0
    This chapter contains sections titled: * The Problem of Induction * Reid’s Common-Sense Realism * Tradition and Reason in the Principles of Informal Inference * Back to the Rationality of Religion * Notes * Bibliography.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. V. G. Bhide (1982). "I" in Science, Religion, and Everyday Life: Rishabhadas Ranka Memorial Lectures 1979. Board of Extra-Mural Studies, University of Poona.score: 198.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Hyung S. Choi, David F. Siemens & Shirley E. Williams (eds.) (2001). Naturalism: Its Impact on Science, Religion and Literature. Canyon Institute for Advanced Studies.score: 198.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Richard De Smet, Jean de Marneffe & Job Kozhamthadam (eds.) (1997). Interrelations and Interpretation: Philosophical Reflections on Science, Religion, and Hermeneutics in Honour of Richard De Smet, S.J. And Jean De Marneffe, S.J. [REVIEW] Intercultural Publications.score: 198.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. George F. R. Ellis (2004). The Science & Religion Dialogue. International Society for Science and Religion.score: 198.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. D. S. Kothari (1978). Some Thoughts on Science & Religion. Shri Raj Krishen Jain Charitable Trust.score: 198.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Kuruvila Pandikattu (ed.) (2008). Dancing to Diversity: Science-Religion Dialogue in India. Serials Publications.score: 198.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Ramakrishnan Srinivasan (2010). Science, Religion, and Philosophy: Towards a Synthesis. Citadel.score: 198.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Helen De Cruz (2014). Cognitive Science of Religion and the Study of Theological Concepts. Topoi 33 (2):487-497.score: 192.0
    The cultural transmission of theological concepts remains an underexplored topic in the cognitive science of religion (CSR). In this paper, I examine whether approaches from CSR, especially the study of content biases in the transmission of beliefs, can help explain the cultural success of some theological concepts. This approach reveals that there is more continuity between theological beliefs and ordinary religious beliefs than CSR authors have hitherto recognized: the cultural transmission of theological concepts is influenced by content biases (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Robert T. Pennock (2011). Can't Philosophers Tell the Difference Between Science and Religion? Demarcation Revisited. Synthese 178 (2):177-206.score: 192.0
    In the 2005 Kitzmiller v Dover Area School Board case, a federal district court ruled that Intelligent Design creationism was not science, but a disguised religious view and that teaching it in public schools is unconstitutional. But creationists contend that it is illegitimate to distinguish science and religion, citing philosophers Quinn and especially Laudan, who had criticized a similar ruling in the 1981 McLean v. Arkansas creation-science case on the grounds that no necessary and sufficient demarcation (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Willem B. Drees (2004). Where to Look for Guidance? On the Nature of "Religion and Science". Zygon 39 (2):367-378.score: 192.0
    . For moral guidance we human beings may be tempted to turn toward the past (scripture, tradition), toward present science, or toward future consequences. Each of these approaches has strengths and limitations. To address those limitations, we need to consider how these various perspectives can be brought together—and “religion and science” is an area in which this may happen. That makes the question of where to look for guidance potentially a central one for religion and science, (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Michael Naas (2009). Miracle and Machine: The Two Sources of Religion and Science in Derrida's "Faith and Knowledge". Research in Phenomenology 39 (2):184-203.score: 192.0
    This essay attempts to lay out the three principal theses of Jacques Derrida’s 1994-1995 “Faith and Knowledge,‘ Derrida’s most sustained but also most challenging work on the nature of religion and the relationship between religion and science. After demonstrating through these three theses that religion and science not only share a common source-or have a common genesis-but are in what Derrida calls an autoimmune relationship to one another, the essay puts these theses to the test (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Gregg Caruso (2014). Science and Religion: 5 Questions. Automatic Press/VIP.score: 192.0
    Are science and religion compatible when it comes to understanding cosmology (the origin of the universe), biology (the origin of life and of the human species), ethics, and the human mind (minds, brains, souls, and free will)? Do science and religion occupy non-overlapping magisteria? Is Intelligent Design a scientific theory? How do the various faith traditions view the relationship between science and religion? What, if any, are the limits of scientific explanation? What are the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Matthew Walhout (2010). Looking to Charles Taylor and Joseph Rouse for Best Practices in Science and Religion. Zygon 45 (3):558-574.score: 192.0
    People discussing science and religion usually frame their conversations in terms of essentialist assumptions about science, assumptions requiring the existence (but not the specification) of criteria according to which science can be distinguished from other forms of inquiry. However, criteria functioning at a level of generality appropriate to such discussions may not exist at all. Essentialist assumptions may be avoided if science is understood within a broader context of human practices. In a philosophy of practices, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. William Desmond, John Steffen & Koen Decoster (eds.) (2001). Beyond Conflict and Reduction: Between Philosophy, Science, and Religion. Leuven University Press.score: 192.0
    INTRODUCTION Much attention has been devoted to the different tensions and conflicts between science and religion in the modern age. ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Taede A. Smedes (2014). Emil Brunner Revisited: On the Cognitive Science of Religion, the Imago Dei, and Revelation. Zygon 49 (1):190-207.score: 192.0
    This article aims at a constructive and argumentative engagement between the cognitive science of religion (CSR) and philosophical and theological reflection on the imago Dei. The Swiss theologian Emil Brunner argued that the theological notion that humans were created in the image of God entails that there is a “point of contact” for revelation to occur. This article argues that Brunner's notion resonates quite strongly with the findings of the CSR. The first part will give a short overview (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Willem B. Drees (2013). Islam and Bioethics in the Context of “Religion and Science”. Zygon 48 (3):732-744.score: 192.0
    This paper places “Islam and bioethics” within the framework of “religion and science” discourse. It thus may be seen as a complement to the paper by Henk ten Have () with which this thematic section in Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science opens, which places “Islam and bioethics” in the context of contemporary bioethics. It turns out that in Zygon there have been more submitted articles on Islam and bioethics than on any other Islam-related topic. This (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. John Hedley Brooke & Ian Maclean (eds.) (2005). Heterodoxy in Early Modern Science and Religion. Oxford University Press.score: 192.0
    The separation of science and religion in modern secular culture can easily obscure the fact that in sixteenth- and seventeenth-century Europe ideas about nature were intimately related to ideas about God. Readers of this book will find fresh and exciting accounts of a phenomenon common to both science and religion: deviation from orthodox belief. How is heterodoxy to be measured? How might the scientific heterodoxy of particular thinkers impinge on their religious views? Would heterodoxy in (...) create a predisposition towards heterodoxy in science? Might there be a homology between heterodox views in both domains? Such major protagonists as Galileo and Newton are re-examined together with less familiar figures in order to bring out the extraordinary richness of scientific and religious thought in the pre-modern world. (shrink)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Sean Esbjörn-Hargens & Ken Wilber (2006). Toward a Comprehensive Integration of Science and Religion: A Postmetaphysical Approach. In Philip Clayton & Zachory Simpson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. 523--546.score: 192.0
    Accession Number: ATLA0001712251; Hosting Book Page Citation: p 523-546.; Physical Description: diag ; Language(s): English; General Note: Bibliography: p 544-546.; Issued by ATLA: 20130825; Publication Type: Essay.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Phillip H. Wiebe (2006). Religious Experience, Cognitive Science, and the Future of Religion. In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oup Oxford. 503-522.score: 192.0
    Accession Number: ATLA0001712249; Hosting Book Page Citation: p 503-522.; Language(s): English; General Note: Bibliography: p 519-522.; Issued by ATLA: 20130825; Publication Type: Essay.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. W. B. Provine (2006). Evolution, Religion, and Science. In Philip Clayton & Zachory Simpson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. 667--80.score: 192.0
    Accession Number: ATLA0001712266; Hosting Book Page Citation: p 667-680.; Language(s): English; General Note: Bibliography: p 679-680.; Issued by ATLA: 20130825; Publication Type: Essay.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. John Hedley Brooke (2006). Contributions From the History of Science and Religion. In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oup Oxford. 293-310.score: 192.0
    Accession Number: ATLA0001712198; Hosting Book Page Citation: p 293-310.; Language(s): English; General Note: Bibliography: p 307-310.; Issued by ATLA: 20130825; Publication Type: Essay.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Lisa L. Stenmark (2006). Going Public: Feminist Epistemologies, Hannah Arendt, and the Science and Religion Discourse. In Philip Clayton (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oup Oxford. 821-835.score: 192.0
    Accession Number: ATLA0001712286; Hosting Book Page Citation: p 821-835.; Language(s): English; General Note: Bibliography: p 835.; Issued by ATLA: 20130825; Publication Type: Essay.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. M. Brierley (2006). The Potential of Panentheism for Dialogue Between Science and Religion. In Philip Clayton & Zachory Simpson (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science. Oxford University Press. 635--651.score: 192.0
    Accession Number: ATLA0001712263; Hosting Book Page Citation: p 635-651.; Language(s): English; General Note: Bibliography: p 647-651.; Issued by ATLA: 20130825; Publication Type: Essay.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Salman Hameed (2012). Walking the Tightrope of the Science and Religion Boundary. Zygon 47 (2):337-342.score: 192.0
    AbstractIslam's Quantum Question by Nidhal Guessoum offers a sophisticated approach to reconciling the results of modern science with Islamic tradition. The book provides a valuable critique of existing literature on Islam and science and advocates the promotion of good science and science education in the Muslim world. A central tension in the book revolves around Guessoum's efforts to promote a version of theistic science, while at the same establishing a clear boundary for science and (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Alan Padgett (2010). Science and Religion in Western History: Models and Relationships. In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. 847--861.score: 192.0
    This chapter contains sections titled: * An Overview of Historical Approaches * Simplicity, Complexity, Modesty * Historical Developments * Recent Developments * Contemporary Proposals * Notes * Bibliography.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Philip Hefner (2014). Ralph Burhoe: Reconsidering the Man and His Vision of Yoking Religion and Science. Zygon 49 (3):629-641.score: 192.0
    Ralph Wendell Burhoe was a leading figure in relating religion and science in the second half of the twentieth century. His autodidactic style and character as a public intellectual resulted in a vision that is comprehensive in its concern for the salvation of society. He does not fit easily into academic frameworks, even though he has been influential upon scholars who work in academia. This article discusses some conundrums posed by his work. There are also brief presentations of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Gregory R. Peterson (2014). On McCauley's Why Religion is Natural and Science is Not: Some Further Observations. Zygon 49 (3):716-727.score: 192.0
    Robert McCauley's Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not provides a summary interpretive statement of the standard model in cognitive science of religion, what I have previously called the HADD + ToM + Cultural Epidemiology model, along with a more general argument comparing religious cognition to scientific thinking and a novel framework for understanding both in terms of the concept of the maturationally natural. I here follow up on some observations made in a previous paper, (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Karl E. Peters (2014). The Changing Cultural Context of the Institute on Religion in an Age of Science and Zygon. Zygon 49 (3):612-628.score: 192.0
    Since Zygon: Journal of Religion and Science was founded 49 years ago and since one of its co-publishers, the Institute on Religion in an Age of Science (IRAS), was founded 60 years ago, there have been significant developments in their various cultural contexts—in science, in religion, in culture, in academia, and in the science and religion dialogue. This article is a personal remembrance and reflection that compares the context of IRAS in 1954 (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. James A. Van Slyke (2014). Religion is Easy, but Science is Hard … Understanding McCauley's Thesis. Zygon 49 (3):696-707.score: 192.0
    Robert N. McCauley's new book Why Religion Is Natural and Science Is Not (2011) presents a new paradigm for investigating the relationship between science and religion by exploring the cognitive foundations of religious belief and scientific knowledge. McCauley's contention is that many of the differences and disagreements regarding religion and science are the product of distinct features of human cognition that process these two domains of knowledge very differently. McCauley's thesis provides valuable insights into (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Bernardo Cantens (2006). Peirce on Science and Religion. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 59 (2):93 - 115.score: 186.0
  47. John Hick (2007). The New Frontier of Religion and Science: Religious Experience, Neuroscience, and the Transcendent. Palgrave Macmillan.score: 186.0
    This is the first major response to the new challenge of neuroscience to religion. There have been limited responses from a purely Christian point of view, but this takes account of eastern as well as western forms of religious experience. It challenges the prevailing naturalistic assumption of our culture, including the idea that the mind is either identical with or a temporary by-product of brain activity. It also discusses religion as institutions and religion as inner experience of (...)
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Varadaraja V. Raman (2010). Changing Landscape in Science-Religion Dialogues. Zygon 45 (1):177-192.score: 180.0
    One peculiarity of the broad theme of science-religion dialogues is that while it has been growing significantly, it seems to be moving farther and farther away from its goal of establishing bridges and understandings between the two enterprises. This essay explores this unhappy situation, with particular reference to the works of two scholars who have been critical of some of the pioneer theologians and have suggested some radically new approaches to the issues.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Attila Grandpierre (2003). On the Fundamental Worldview of the Integral Culture: Integrating Science, Religion, and Art: Part One. World Futures 59 (6):463 – 483.score: 180.0
    In the present essay the author suggests that the main reason why history failed to develop societies in harmony with Nature, including our internal nature as well, is that we failed to evaluate the exact basis of the factor ultimately governing our thoughts. We failed to realize that it is the worldview that ultimately governs our thoughts and through our thoughts, our actions. In this work we consider the ultimate foundations of philosophy, science, religion, and art, pointing out (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Ernest William Barnes (1933). Scientific Theory and Religion: The World Described by Science and its Spiritual Interpretation. Cambridge [Eng.],The University Press.score: 180.0
1 — 50 / 1000