Search results for 'self-organization' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Bernard Feltz (ed.) (2006). Self-Organization and Emergence in Life Sciences (Synthese Library, Volume 331). Dordrecht: Springer.score: 90.0
    Historical aspects of the issue are also broached. Intuitions relative to self-organization can be found in the works of such key Western philosophical figures as Aristotle, Leibniz and Kant. Interacting with more recent authors and cybernetics, self-organization represents a notion in keeping with the modern world’s discovery of radical complexity. The themes of teleology and emergence are analyzed by philosophers of sciences with regards to the issues of modelization and scientific explanation. (publisher, edited).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Andrew A. Fingelkurts, Alexander A. Fingelkurts & Carlos F. H. Neves (forthcoming). Consciousness as a Phenomenon in the Operational Architectonics of Brain Organization: Criticality and Self-Organization Considerations. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals.score: 90.0
    In this paper we aim to show that phenomenal consciousness is realized by a particular level of brain operational organization and that understanding human consciousness requires a description of the laws of the immediately underlying neural collective phenomena, the nested hierarchy of electromagnetic fields of brain activity – operational architectonics. We argue that the subjective mental reality and the objective neurobiological reality, although seemingly worlds apart, are intimately connected along a unified metastable continuum and are both guided by the universal (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Stanley Krippner & Allan Combs (2000). Self-Organization in the Dreaming Brain. Journal of Mind and Behavior 21 (4):399-412.score: 75.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Ralph D. Ellis (1999). Why Isn't Consciousness Empirically Observable? Emotion, Self-Organization, and Nonreductive Physicalism. Journal of Mind and Behavior 20 (4):391-402.score: 69.0
  5. Ralph D. Ellis (2000). Consciousness, Self-Organization, and the Process-Substratum Relation: Rethinking Nonreductive Physicalism. Philosophical Psychology 13 (2):173-190.score: 66.0
    Knowing only what is empirically knowable can't by itself entail knowledge of what consciousness "is like." But if dualism is to be avoided, the question arises: how can a process be completely empirically unobservable when all of its components are completely observable? The recently emerging theory of self-organization offers resources with which to resolve this problem: Consciousness can be an empirically unobservable process because the emotions motivating attention are experienced only from the perspective of the one whose phenomenal states (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Henri Atlan (2011). Selected Writings on Self-Organization, Philosophy, Bioethics, and Judaism. Fordham University Press.score: 66.0
    Self-organization -- Organisms, finalisms, programs, machines -- Spinoza -- Judaism, determinism, and rationalities -- Fabricating the living -- Ethics.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent (2009). Self-Assembly, Self-Organization: Nanotechnology and Vitalism. Nanoethics 3 (1):31-42.score: 60.0
    Over the past decades, self-assembly has attracted a lot of research attention and transformed the relations between chemistry, materials science and biology. The paper explores the impact of the current interest in self-assembly techniques on the traditional debate over the nature of life. The first section describes three different research programs of self-assembly in nanotechnology in order to characterize their metaphysical implications: (1) Hybridization (using the building blocks of living systems for making devices and machines) ; (2) Biomimetics (making artifacts (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Francis Heylighen (forthcoming). The Self-Organization of Time and Causality: Steps Towards Understanding the Ultimate Origin. Foundations of Science.score: 60.0
    Possibly the most fundamental scientific problem is the origin of time and causality. The inherent difficulty is that all scientific theories of origins and evolution consider the existence of time and causality as given. We tackle this problem by starting from the concept of self-organization, which is seen as the spontaneous emergence of order out of primordial chaos. Self-organization can be explained by the selective retention of invariant or consistent variations, implying a breaking of the initial symmetry exhibited (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Randall Whitaker, Self Organization, Autopoiesis, and Enterprises.score: 60.0
    'Self organization' is a popular theme in current studies of human social activity, enterprises, and information technology (IT). This document introduces one well developed theory of self organization (autopoietic theory) and discusses its application to enterprises and their management.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Robert C. Richardson (2001). Complexity, Self-Organization and Selection. Biology and Philosophy 16 (5).score: 60.0
    Recent work on self organization promises an explanation of complex order which is independent of adaptation. Self-organizing systems are complex systems of simple units, projecting order as a consequence of localized and generally nonlinear interactions between these units. Stuart Kauffman offers one variation on the theme of self-organization, offering what he calls a ``statistical mechanics'' for complex systems. This paper explores the explanatory strategies deployed in this ``statistical mechanics,'' initially focusing on the autonomy of statistical explanation as it applies (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Bruce H. Weber & David J. Depew (1996). Natural Selection and Self-Organization. Biology and Philosophy 11 (1):33-65.score: 60.0
    The Darwinian concept of natural selection was conceived within a set of Newtonian background assumptions about systems dynamics. Mendelian genetics at first did not sit well with the gradualist assumptions of the Darwinian theory. Eventually, however, Mendelism and Darwinism were fused by reformulating natural selection in statistical terms. This reflected a shift to a more probabilistic set of background assumptions based upon Boltzmannian systems dynamics. Recent developments in molecular genetics and paleontology have put pressure on Darwinism once again. Current work (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. J. B. Edelmann & M. J. Denton (2007). The Uniqueness of Biological Self-Organization: Challenging the Darwinian Paradigm. Biology and Philosophy 22 (4):579-601.score: 60.0
    Here we discuss the challenge posed by self-organization to the Darwinian conception of evolution. As we point out, natural selection can only be the major creative agency in evolution if all or most of the adaptive complexity manifest in living organisms is built up over many generations by the cumulative selection of naturally occurring small, random mutations or variants, i.e., additive, incremental steps over an extended period of time. Biological self-organization—witnessed classically in the folding of a protein, or (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. J. T. Ismael (2011). Self-Organization and Self-Governance. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (3):327-351.score: 60.0
    The intuitive difference between a system that choreographs the motion of its parts in the service of goals of its own formulation and a system composed of a collection of parts doing their own thing without coordination has been shaken by now familiar examples of self-organization. There is a broad and growing presumption in parts of philosophy and across the sciences that the appearance of centralized information-processing and control in the service of system-wide goals is mere appearance, i.e., an (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Peter C. M. Molenaar & Han L. J. van der Maas (2000). Neural Constructivism or Self-Organization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):783-784.score: 60.0
    Three arguments are given to show that neural constructivism lacks an essential ingredient to explain cognitive development. Based on results in the theory of adaptive signal analysis, adaptive biological pattern information and self-organization in nonlinear systems of information processing, it is concluded that neural constructivism should be further extended to accommodate the occurrence of phase transitions generating qualitative development in the sense of Piaget.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. János Szentágothai (1993). Self-Organization: The Basic Principle of Neural Functions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (2).score: 60.0
    Recent neurophysiological observations are giving rise to the expectation that in the near future genuine biological experiments may contribute more than will premature speculations to the understanding of global and cognitive functions. The classical reflex principle — as the basis of neural functions — has to yield to new ideas, like autopoiesis and/or self-organization, as the basic paradigm in the framework of which the essence of the neural can be better understood. Neural activity starts in the very earliest stages (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. John Collier, Fundamental Properties of Self-Organization.score: 60.0
    In these notes I want to address some issues concerning self-organization that seem to me to apply generally from the micro-physical through the biological and social to the cosmological. That is, they are a part of the general theory of self-organization. I prefer to distinguish the theory of selforganization from the analysis of the concept of self-organization (which Maturana claims is oxymoronic, since there is no self that organizes1). General usage gives us something to which the term (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Nicolas Glade (forthcoming). On the Nature and Shape of Tubulin Trails: Implications on Microtubule Self-Organization. Acta Biotheoretica.score: 60.0
    Abstract Microtubules, major elements of the cell skeleton are, most of the time, well organized in vivo, but they can also show self-organizing behaviors in time and/or space in purified solutions in vitro. Theoretical studies and models based on the concepts of collective dynamics in complex systems, reaction–diffusion processes and emergent phenomena were proposed to explain some of these behaviors. In the particular case of microtubule spatial self-organization, it has been advanced that microtubules could behave like ants, self-organizing by (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. E. Bernard-Weil (1995). Self-Organization and Emergence Are Some Irrelevant Concepts Without Their Association with the Concepts of Hetero-Organization and Immergence. Acta Biotheoretica 43 (4).score: 60.0
    There are many reasons for questioning the relevance of the concepts of self-organization (SO) and emergence. By studying three types of SO, respectively related to ontogeny, phylogeny and formalized models, we show that we always have to suppose an associated hetero-organization and preconceived immergence, unconsciously present in the authors mind. In order to understand how these unusual couples are working, they must be considered as agonistic antagonistic couples. Heteroorganization and immergence put constraints on the system so that SO and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Carl N. Johnson & Melanie Nyhof (2006). Transcendental Self-Organization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):478-478.score: 60.0
    Bering makes a good case for turning attention to an organized system that provides the self with transcendental meaning. In focusing on the evolutionary basis of this system, however, he overlooks the self-organizing properties of cognitive systems themselves. We propose that the illusory system Bering describes can be more generally and parsimoniously viewed as an emergent by-product of self-organization, with no need for specialized “illusion by design.”.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Robert E. Page & Sandra D. Mitchell (1990). Self Organization and Adaptation in Insect Societies. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:289 - 298.score: 60.0
    Division of labor and its associated phenomena have been viewed as prime examples of group-level adaptations. However, the adaptations are the result of the process of evolution by natural selection and thus require that groups of insects once existed and competed for reproduction, some of which had a heritable division of labor while others did not. We present models, based on those of Kauffman (1984) that demonstrate how division of labor may occur spontaneously among groups of mutually tolerant individuals. We (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. R. I. Damper (1998). Self-Learning and Self-Organization as Tools for Speech Research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):262-263.score: 60.0
    Locus equations offer promise for an understanding of at least some aspects of perceptual invariance in speech, but they were discovered almost fortuitously. With the present availability of powerful machine learning algorithms, ignorance-based automatic discovery procedures are starting to supplant knowledge-based scientific inquiry. Principles of self-learning and self-organization are powerful tools for speech research but remain somewhat under-utilized.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Sylvie Geisendorf (2009). The Economic Concept of Evolution: Self-Organization or Universal Darwinism? Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (4):377-391.score: 60.0
    Somewhat surprisingly, evolutionary economists are far from agreeing upon the economic concept of evolution. The debate revolves around the question whether the mechanisms of variation, selection and retention are general principles of evolutionary processes, also valid in economics, or if economic evolution can be described by self-organization. The paper argues that self-organization is a useful concept, but has not yet fulfilled the aspiration to describe economic evolution as an endogenous process. In self-organization models important aspects, like novelty (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. L. Leydesdorff (forthcoming). Radical Constructivism and Radical Constructedness: Luhmann's Sociology of Semantics, Organizations, and Self-Organization. Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):85-92.score: 60.0
    Context: Using radical constructivism, society can be considered from the perspective of asking the question, “Who conceives of society?” In Luhmann’s social systems theory, this question itself is considered as a construct of the communication among reflexive agents. Problem: Structuration of expectations by codes operating in interhuman communications positions both communicators and communications in a multi-dimensional space in which their relations can be provided with meaning at the supra-individual level. The codes can be functionally different and symbolically generalized. Method: More (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Peter Jörg Plath (2009). Self-Organization and Identity Links Between Theories. In Wolfgang Wildgen & Barend van Heusden (eds.), Metarepresentation, Self-Organization and Art. Peter Lang.score: 60.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Stanley N. Salthe (forthcoming). Modeling Self -Organization. Semiotics:14-23.score: 60.0
    Foremost among the tasks facing a semiotically-informed modeling of natural open systems is the recognition and representation of self-organization. This forces attention on process, time, and energetics to complement the conventional semiotic bias toward structure, space, and informatics. While self -organization might be captured in numerous operational idioms, we suggest that the fundamentally distinctive formal structures of (a) development (intrinsic predictability) and (b) evolution (unexpected change through change in contextual meaning) constitute thewarp and woof of virtually all observations on (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Wolfgang Wildgen (2009). Meta-Representation, Self-Organization and Self-Reference in the Visual Arts. In Wolfgang Wildgen & Barend van Heusden (eds.), Metarepresentation, Self-Organization and Art. Peter Lang.score: 60.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Helena Knyazeva (2003). Self-Reflective Synergetics. Systems Research and Behavioral Science 20 (1):53-64.score: 54.0
    An attempt to critically analyse the claims of the theory of self-organization of complex systems (synergetics) to the interdisciplinary generalizations and the universal efficacy of its models is made in the paper. The grounds for transfer of synergetic models to different disciplinary fields are under discussion. It is argued that synergetics is a mental scheme or a heuristic approach to exploring the complex behaviour of systems, rather than a universal key to solving concrete scientific problems. The prospects for development (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Ralph D. Ellis (ed.) (2000). The Caldron of Consciousness: Motivation, Affect and Self-Organization. John Benjamins.score: 51.0
  29. Liane Gabora, Self-Other Organization: Why Early Life Did Not Evolve Through Natural Selection.score: 51.0
    The improbability of a spontaneously generated self-assembling molecule has suggested that life began with a set of simpler, collectively replicating elements, such as an enclosed autocatalytic set of polymers (or autocell). Since replication occurs without a self-assembly code, acquired characteristics are inherited. Moreover, there is no strict distinction between alive and dead; one can only infer that an autocell was alive if it replicates. These features of early life render natural selection inapplicable to the description of its change-of-state because they (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Roberto Serra (ed.) (1986). Introduction to the Physics of Complex Systems: The Mesoscopic Approach to Fluctuations, Non Linearity, and Self-Organization. Pergamon.score: 51.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. Iris van Rooij (2012). Self-Organization Takes Time Too. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):63-71.score: 48.0
    Four articles in this issue of topiCS (volume 4, issue 1) argue against a computational approach in cognitive science in favor of a dynamical approach. I concur that the computational approach faces some considerable explanatory challenges. Yet the dynamicists’ proposal that cognition is self-organized seems to only go so far in addressing these challenges. Take, for instance, the hypothesis that cognitive behavior emerges when brain and body (re-)configure to satisfy task and environmental constraints. It is known that for certain systems (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Richard Johns, Self-Organisation in Dynamical Systems: A Limiting Result.score: 48.0
    Self organization, or “order for free”, is an important (and expanding) area of inquiry. Self-organized structures occur in many contexts, including biology. While these structures may be intricate and impressive, there are some limitations on the kinds of structure than can self-organize, given the dynamical laws. (William Paley pointed out, for example, that a watch cannot be produced by “the laws of metallic nature”.) In this paper I will demonstrate that certain fundamental symmetries in the laws of physics constrain self (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Michael J. Behe (2000). Self-Organization and Irreducibly Complex Systems: A Reply to Shanks and Joplin. Philosophy of Science 67 (1):155-162.score: 48.0
    Some biochemical systems require multiple, well-matched parts in order to function, and the removal of any of the parts eliminates the function. I have previously labeled such systems "irreducibly complex," and argued that they are stumbling blocks for Darwinian theory. Instead I proposed that they are best explained as the result of deliberate intelligent design. In a recent article Shanks and Joplin analyze and find wanting the use of irreducible complexity as a marker for intelligent design. Their primary counterexample is (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Wolfgang Wildgen & Barend van Heusden (eds.) (2009). Metarepresentation, Self-Organization and Art. Peter Lang.score: 48.0
    This book is about the interrelationship between nature, semiosis, metarepresentation and (self-)consciousness, and the role played by metarepresentation in ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Scott J. Reynolds (2003). Perceptions of Organizational Ethicality: Do Inflated Perceptions of Self Lead to Inflated Perceptions of the Organization? Journal of Business Ethics 42 (3):253 - 266.score: 48.0
    Scholars have suggested that the tendency for an individual to perceive him- or herself as more ethical than others might influence the individual''s perceptions of his or her organization''s ethics. The purpose of this study is to consider if and/or when such a relationship exists. A thorough consideration of the nature of perceptions of relative ethicality suggests that a positive self-bias would negatively influence perceptions of organizational ethicality. The results of an empirical study involving working managers and employees of a (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Thomas S. Smith & Gregory T. Stevens (1996). Emergence, Self-Organization, and Social Interaction: Arousal-Dependent Structure in Social Systems. Sociological Theory 14 (2):131-153.score: 48.0
    The understanding of emergent, self-organizing phenomena has been immensely deepened in recent years on the basis of simulation-based theoretical research. We discuss these new ideas, and illustrate them using examples from several fields. Our discussion serves to introduce equivalent self-organized phenomena in social interaction. Interaction systems appear to be structured partly by virtue of such emergents. These appear under specific conditions: When cognitive buffering is inadequate relative to the levels of stress persons are subjected to, anxiety-spreading has the potential of (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Richard Sternberg (1996). The Role of Constrained Self-Organization in Genome Structural Evolution. Acta Biotheoretica 44 (2).score: 48.0
    A hypothesis of genome structural evolution is explored. Rapid and cohesive alterations in genome organization are viewed as resulting from the dynamic and constrained interactions of chromosomal subsystem components. A combination of macromolecular boundary conditions and DNA element involvement in far-from-equilibrium reactions is proposed to increase the complexity of genomic subsystems via the channelling of genome turnover; interactions between subsystems create higher-order subsystems expanding the phase space for further genetic evolution. The operation of generic constraints on structuration in genome evolution (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Pavel N. Prudkov (2003). Connectionism, ACT-R, and the Principle of Self-Organization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):616-617.score: 48.0
    The target article is based upon the principle that complex mental phenomena result from the interactions among some elementary entities. Connectionist nodes and ACT-R's production rules can be considered as such entities. However, before testing against Newell's macro-criteria, self-organizing models must be tested against criteria relating to the properties of their elementary entities. When such micro-criteria are considered, they separate connectionism from ACT-R and the comparison of these theories against Newell's Tests is hardly correct.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. B. Courtin, A. -M. Perault-Staub & J. -F. Staub (1995). Spatio-Temporal Self-Organization of Bone Mineral Metabolism and Trabecular Structure of Primary Bone. Acta Biotheoretica 43 (4).score: 48.0
    A nonlinear two-variable reaction-diffusion model of bone mineral metabolism, built from an overall self-oscillatory compartmental model of calcium metabolism in vivo, has been studied for its ability to generate spatial and spatio-temporal self-organizations in a two-dimensional space. Analytical and numerical results confirm the theoretical properties previously described for this kind of model. In particular, it is shown that, for a given set of reactional parameter values and certain values of the ratio of the two diffusion coefficients, there exists a set (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Iván Oliva (2012). Life, cognition and culture: charting processes of self-eco-organization. Cinta de Moebio (43):40-49.score: 48.0
    This paper proposes an initial epistemological course related to the notions of life, cognition, and culture from the fundamental elements of the complexity theory and, specifically, related to the notion of self-eco-organization. With these, we pretend to search isomorphic or transverse properties to all these notions; emphasizing the ideas of complexity, autonomy and dependence. El presente trabajo propone un derrotero epistemológico preliminar en torno a las nociones de vida, cognición y cultura, desde la base de algunos elementos de la teoría (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Erik Rietveld (2008). The Skillful Body as a Concernful System of Possible Actions: Phenomena and Neurodynamics. Theory & Psychology 18 (3):341-361.score: 45.0
    For Merleau-Ponty,consciousness in skillful coping is a matter of prereflective ‘I can’ and not explicit ‘I think that.’ The body unifies many domain-specific capacities. There exists a direct link between the perceived possibilities for action in the situation (‘affordances’) and the organism’s capacities. From Merleau-Ponty’s descriptions it is clear that in a flow of skillful actions, the leading ‘I can’ may change from moment to moment without explicit deliberation. How these transitions occur, however, is less clear. Given that Merleau-Ponty suggested (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Helena Knyazeva & Sergei Kurdyumov (2001). Nonlinear Synthesis and Co-Evolution of Complex Systems. World Futures 57 (3):239-261.score: 45.0
    Today a change is imperative in approaching global problems: what is needed is not arm-twisting and power politics, but searching for ways of co-evolution in the complex social and geopolitical systems of the world. The modern theory of self-organization of complex systems provides us with an understanding of the possible forms of coexistence of heterogeneous social and geopolitical structures at different stages of development regarding the different paths of their sustainable co-evolutionary development. The theory argues that the evolutionary channel (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. David Aubin (2008). 'The Memory of Life Itself': Bénard's Cells and the Cinematography of Self-Organization. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 39 (3):359-369.score: 45.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Hermann Haken & Helena Knyazeva (2000). Arbitrariness in Nature: Synergetics and Evolutionary Laws of Prohibition. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 31 (1):57-73.score: 45.0
    The philosophical consequences of synergetics, the interdisciplinary theory of evolution and self-organization of complex systems, are being drawn in the paper. The idea of discreteness of evolutionary paths is in the focus of attention. Although the future is open, and there are many alternative evolutionary paths for complex systems, not any arbitrary (either conceivable or desirable) evolutionary path is feasible in a given system. There are discrete spectra of possible evolutionary paths which are determined exclusively by inner properties of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Karl H. Pribram (ed.) (1994). Origins: Brain and Self-Organization. Lawrence Erlbaum.score: 45.0
    The result of the second Appalachian conference on neurodynamics, this volume focuses on the problem of "order," its origins, evolution, and future.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Alicia Juarrero Roqué (1985). Self-Organization: Kant's Concept of Teleology and Modern Chemistry. The Review of Metaphysics 39 (1):107 - 135.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. Ralph D. Ellis & Natika Newton (eds.) (2000). The Caldron of Consciousness: Motivation, Affect and Self-Organization--An Anthology. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.score: 45.0
    CHAPTER 1 Integrating the Physiological and Phenomenological Dimensions of Affect and Motivation Ralph D. Ellis Clark Atlanta University A neglected but ...
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Inna Semetsky (2005). From Design to Self-Organization, Or: A Proper Structure for a Proper Function. Axiomathes 15 (4).score: 45.0
    It is suggested that Charles Sanders Peirce's triadic semiotics provides a framework for a diagrammatic representation of a sign's proper structure. The action of signs is described at the logical and psychological levels. The role of (unconscious) abductive inference is analyzed, and a diagram of reasoning is offered. A series of interpretants transform brute facts into interpretable signs thereby providing human experience with value or meaning. The triadic structure helps in de-mystifying the relations between Penrose's three worlds when the latter (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Christian Fuchs (2002). Some Implications of Anthony Giddens' Works for a Theory of Social Self-Organization. Emergence 4 (3):7-35.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. David Batten, Stanley Salthe & Fabio Boschetti (2008). Visions of Evolution: Self-Organization Proposes What Natural Selection Disposes. Biological Theory 3 (1):17-29.score: 45.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  51. Helena Knyazeva (2005). Figures of Time in Evolution of Complex Systems. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 36 (2):289 - 304.score: 45.0
    Owing to intensive development of the theory of self-organization of complex systems called also synergetics, profound changes in our notions of time occur. Whereas at the beginning of the 20th century, natural sciences, by picking up the general spirit of Einstein's theory of relativity, consider a geometrization as an ideal, i.e. try to represent time and force interactions through space and the changes of its properties, nowadays, at the beginning of the 21st century, time turns to be in the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  52. Akop P. Nazaretyan (2005). Fear of the Dead as a Factor in Social Self-Organization. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35 (2):155–169.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  53. Rainer Beer (1989). The Productivity of Nature. Schelling's Natural Philosophy and the New Paradigm of Self-Organization in the Sciences. Philosophy and History 22 (1):16-18.score: 45.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  54. Hugo Letiche (2000). Self-Organization, Action Theory, and Entrainment. Emergence 2 (2):58-71.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  55. Helena Knyazeva (1999). The Synergetic Principles of Nonlinear Thinking. World Futures 54 (2):163-181.score: 45.0
    In order to develop further the methods of scenario building and to facilitate the paths towards desirable and sustainable futures, we cannot do without a nonlinear evolutionary thinking. The theory of self-organization of complex systems, called also synergetics, is a scientific basis for such a thinking, the main principles of which are under consideration in the paper. Synergetics provides us with the knowledge of constructive principles of coevolution of the complex social systems, coevolution of countries and geopolitical regions being (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  56. Bruce H. Weber (1998). Origins of Order in Dynamical Models. A Review of Stuart A. Kauffman, the Origins of Order: Self Organization and Selection in Evolution. Biology and Philosophy 13 (1).score: 45.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  57. Rocco Gangle (2007). Collective Self-Organization in General Biology: Gilles Deleuze, Charles S. Peirce, and Stuart Kauffman. Zygon 42 (1):223-240.score: 45.0
  58. Philip Anderson & Jack Cohen (1999). Reviews: Coping with Uncertainty, Insights From the New Sciences of Chaos, Self-Organization, and Complexity, Uri Merry. [REVIEW] Emergence 1 (2):106-108.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  59. Francisco Biasdie & Mario Sergio Rocha (1999). Information Self-Organization and Consciousness—Towards a Holoinformational Theory of Consciousness. World Futures 53 (4):309-327.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  60. Niels Henrik Gregersen (1999). Autopoiesis: Less Than Self-Constitution, More Than Self-Organization: Reply to Gilkey, Mcclelland and Deltete, and Brun. Zygon 34 (1):117-138.score: 45.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  61. Scott C. Hammond & Matthew L. Sanders (2002). Dialogue as Social Self-Organization: An Introduction. Emergence 4 (4):7-24.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  62. B. Thierry (1997). Adaptation and Self-Organization in Primate Societies. Diogenes 45 (180):39-71.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  63. Arturo Carsetti (2003). Rational Perception and Self-Organization of Forms. Axiomathes 13 (3-4):459-470.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  64. Ignazio Masulli (1993). Towards a Theory of Self-Organization of Natural and Social Systems: The Theory of Form. World Futures 38 (1):139-148.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  65. Elpida S. Tzafestas (2006). Fluidity, Adaptivity, and Self-Organization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (2):140-141.score: 45.0
    I propose a neuroscience and animat research-inspired model and a thought experiment to test the hypothesis of a developmental relation between fluid and crystallized intelligence. I propose that crystallized intelligence is the result of well-defined activities and structures, whereas fluid intelligence is the physiological catalytic adaptation mechanism responsible for coordinating and regulating the crystallized structures. We can design experiments to reproduce exemplified normal and anomalous phenomena, especially disorders, and study possible cognitive treatments. (Published Online April 5 2006).
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  66. Gary Backhaus (2000). The Caldron of Consciousness: Motivation, Affect and Self-Organization--An Anthology. Amsterdam: J Benjamins.score: 45.0
  67. Daniéle Bourcier & Gérard Clergue (1999). From a Rule-Based Conception to Dynamic Patterns. Analyzing the Self-Organization of Legal Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3).score: 45.0
    The representation of knowledge in the law has basically followed a rule-based logical-symbolic paradigm. This paper aims to show how the modeling of legal knowledge can be re-examined using connectionist models, from the perspective of the theory of the dynamics of unstable systems and chaos. We begin by showing the nature of the paradigm shift from a rule-based approach to one based on dynamic structures and by discussing how this would translate into the field of theory of law. In order (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  68. Joseph E. Earley (1981). Self-Organization and Agency. Process Studies 11 (4):242-258.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  69. Ralph D. Ellis & Natika Newton (eds.) (2000). The Caldron of Consciousness: Motivation, Affect and Self-Organization- An Anthology. Advances in Consciousness Research. John Benjamins.score: 45.0
  70. Maria Gonzales, Mariana Broens, Willem Haselager & Ettore (2005). Self-Organization and Life: A Systemic Approach. Manuscrito 28 (2).score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  71. Erich Jantsch (1975). Design for Evolution: Self-Organization and Planning in the Life of Human Systems. G. Braziller.score: 45.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  72. L. A. Leydesdorff (1995). The Challenge of Scientometrics: The Development, Measurement, and Self-Organization of Scientific Communications. Dswo Press, Leiden University.score: 45.0
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  73. Gerhard Roth & Helmut Schwegler (1990). Self-Organization, Emergent Properties and the Unity of the World. Philosophica 46.score: 45.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  74. Abraham Rudnick (forthcoming). What is a Psychiatric Disability? Health Care Analysis:1-9.score: 45.0
    This article aims to clarify the notion of a psychiatric disability. The article uses conceptual analysis, examining and applying established definitions of (general) disability to psychiatric disabilities. This analysis reveals that disability as inability to perform according to expectations or norms is related to impairment as deviation from the (statistical) norm, while disability as inability to achieve (personal) goals is related to impairment as deviation from the (personal) ideal. These two views of impairment and disability are distinct from the (...) view of impairment as disrupted self-creation or disrupted self-repair and of disability as disrupted whole person self-compensation (in relation to an impairment). All these three views of disability pertain to psychiatric disability. Although there is nothing necessarily psychiatric about psychiatric disability other than the psychiatric impairment related to it, the life course and life circumstances typical of many people with (severe) psychiatric disorders may lead to disability and may thus confer some (psychiatric) specificity on this disability. This analysis may facilitate research on specific psychiatric disabilities and a broader scope for psychiatric rehabilitation. (shrink)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  75. Richard Johns, Spontaneous Self-Organisation: A Limiting Result.score: 40.0
    The term “spontaneous self-organisation” (SSO for short) is used to describe the emergence of an object or structure “by itself” within a dynamical system. While usage of the term will no doubt vary somewhat, in this paper I will take it to have three key features: 1. The appearance of the object does not require a special, “fine-tuned” initial state. 2. There is no need for interaction with an external system. 3. The object is likely to appear in a reasonably (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  76. John Collier, Self-Organisation, Individuation and Identity.score: 40.0
    Self-organisation is a process by which larger scale order is formed in a system through the promotion of fluctuations at a smaller scale via processes inherent in the system dynamics, modulated by interactions between the system and its surroundings. The self in self-organisation presents certain problems: 1) What is the self that organises? 2) Why is it a self? 3) What is it for a process to be inherent to the system dynamics? 4) What does it mean for interactions with (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  77. Nicolas Glade, Jacques Demongeot & James Tabony (2002). Numerical Simulations of Microtubule Self-Organisation by Reaction and Diffusion. Acta Biotheoretica 50 (4).score: 40.0
    This article addresses the physical chemical processes underlying biological self-organisation by which a homogenous solution of reacting chemicals spontaneously self-organises. Theoreticians have predicted that self-organisation can arise from a coupling of reactive processes with molecular diffusion. In addition, the presence of an external field, such as gravity, at a critical moment early in the process may determine the morphology that subsequently develops. The formation, in-vitro, of microtubules, a constituent of the cellular skeleton, shows this type of behaviour. The preparations spontaneously (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  78. George Székely (2000). Self-Organisation or Reflex Theory? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (4):549-550.score: 40.0
    Neuromodelling is one of the techniques of modern neurosciences. The “at a distance” type of triadic synapse is probably the prevailing form of impulse transmission in many parts of the brain. If the genetically controlled cell-to-cell neuronal interconnections are abandoned, self-organisation may be the mechanism of structure formation in the brain. This assumption weakens the position of the reflex arc as the basic functional unit of nervous activities.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  79. Lindsay McShane & Peggy Cunningham (2012). To Thine Own Self Be True? Employees' Judgments of the Authenticity of Their Organization's Corporate Social Responsibility Program. Journal of Business Ethics 108 (1):81-100.score: 39.0
    Despite recognizing the importance of developing authentic corporate social responsibility (CSR) programs, noticeably absent from the literature is consideration for how employees distinguish between authentic and inauthentic CSR programs. This is somewhat surprising given that employees are essentially the face of their organization and are largely expected to act as ambassadors for the organization’s CSR program (Collier and Esteban in Bus Ethics 16:19–33, 2007 ). The current research, by conducting depth interviews with employees, builds a better understanding of how employees (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  80. Christopher Vasillopulos (1988). Heroism, Self-Abnegation and the Liberal Organization. Journal of Business Ethics 7 (8):585 - 591.score: 39.0
    Chester Barnard's classic, The Functions of the Executive, is premised on an Aristotelean conception of human nature. This reliance ramifies throughout his analysis of the cooperative basis of human organizations. Perhaps its most important manifestation appears in his definition of willing cooperation as self-abnegation. For by so removing cooperation from its utilitarian and contractarian assumptions, he avoids the well known criticisms of those assumptions while retaining his fundamental liberalism. Put positively, self-abnegation informs Barnard's liberalism with an heroic dimension. This, in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  81. Allan Combs, David Kahn & Stanley Krippner (2000). Dreaming and the Self-Organizing Brain. Journal of Consciousness Studies 7 (7):4-11.score: 39.0
  82. Georg Theiner (2011). Review of John Bolender (2010). The Self-Organizing Social Mind. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews.score: 39.0
  83. David Jones & John Culliney (1999). The Fractal Self and the Organization of Nature: The Daoist Sage and Chaos Theory. Zygon 34 (4):643-654.score: 36.0
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  84. Andrew A. Fingelkurts, Alexander A. Fingelkurts & Carlos F. H. Neves (2010). Natural World Physical, Brain Operational, and Mind Phenomenal Space-Time. Physics of Life Reviews 7 (2):195-249.score: 33.0
    Concepts of space and time are widely developed in physics. However, there is a considerable lack of biologically plausible theoretical frameworks that can demonstrate how space and time dimensions are implemented in the activity of the most complex life-system – the brain with a mind. Brain activity is organized both temporally and spatially, thus representing space-time in the brain. Critical analysis of recent research on the space-time organization of the brain’s activity pointed to the existence of so-called operational space-time in (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  85. Helena Knyazeva (1998). The Synergetic View of Human Creativity. Evolution and Cognition 4 (2):145-155.score: 33.0
    The heuristic value of synergetic models of evolving and self-organizing complex systems as well as their application to epistemological problems is shown in this paper. Nonlinear synergetic models turn out to be fruitful in comprehending epistemological problems such as the nature of human creativity, the functioning of human intuition and imagination, the historical development of science and culture. In the light of synergetics creative thinking can be viewed as a selforganization and self-completion of images and thoughts, filling up gaps in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  86. Wolfgang Tschacher & Christian Scheier (1996). The Perspective of Situated and Self-Organizing Cognition in Cognitive Psychology. Communication and Cognition-Artificial Intelligence 13 (2-3):163-189.score: 33.0
  87. Jan de Leede, André H. J. Nijhof & Olaf A. M. Fisscher (1999). The Myth of Self-Managing Teams: A Reflection on the Allocation of Responsibilities Between Individuals, Teams and the Organisation. Journal of Business Ethics 21 (2-3).score: 32.0
    Concepts that include the participation and empowerment of workers are becoming increasingly important nowadays. In many of these concepts, the formal responsibility is delegated to teams. Does this imply that the normative responsibility for the actions of teams is also delegated? In this article we will reflect on the difference between holding a person accountable and bearing responsibility. A framework is elaborated in order to analyse the accountability and responsibility of teams. In this framework, the emergence of a collective mind, (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  88. Palmyre M. F. Oomen (2003). On Brain, Soul, Self, and Freedom: An Essay in Bridging Neuroscience and Faith. Zygon 38 (2):377-392.score: 30.0
    The article begins at the intellectual fissure between many statements coming from neuroscience and the language of faith and theology. First I show that some conclusions drawn from neuroscientific research are not as firm as they seem: neuroscientific data leave room for the interpretation that mind matters. I then take a philosophical-theological look at the notions of soul, self, and freedom, also in the light of modern scientific research (self-organization, neuronal networks), and present a view in which these theologically (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  89. Andrew A. Fingelkurts & Alexander A. Fingelkurts (2004). Making Complexity Simpler: Multivariability and Metastability in the Brain. International Journal of Neuroscience 114 (7):843 - 862.score: 30.0
    This article provides a retrospective, current and prospective overview on developments in brain research and neuroscience. Both theoretical and empirical studies are considered, with emphasis in the concept of multivariability and metastability in the brain. In this new view on the human brain, the potential multivariability of the neuronal networks appears to be far from continuous in time, but confined by the dynamics of short-term local and global metastable brain states. The article closes by suggesting some of the implications of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  90. Valeria Giardino (2006). Arturo Carsetti • Seeing, Thinking and Knowing: Meaning and Self-Organisation in Visual Cognition and Thought • Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers, • 2004 • Hardback £97.00 • Isbn: 1402020805. [REVIEW] British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):623-625.score: 30.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  91. Graham Oppy, Review of Dean L. Overman (1997) a Case Against Accident and Self-Organisation New York: Rowman & Littlefield. [REVIEW]score: 30.0
    To judge from the dust-jacket, this book has received a considerable amount of praise--and not just from the usual suspects. In particular, the publishers seem keen to promulgate the view that there is widespread support for the claim that Overman makes a clear, compelling, and well-argued case for the conclusions which he wishes to defend. However, it seems to me that those cited on the dust-jacket--Pannenberg ("lucid and sobering arguments"), Polkinghorne ("scrupulously argued"), Nicholi ("compelling logic and carefully reasoned argument"), Kaita (...)
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  92. Siegfried Maser (1989). Evolution as Higher Development of the Consciousness. On the Intentional Preconditions of Material Self-Organisation. Philosophy and History 22 (2):153-153.score: 30.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  93. Hermann Haken & Helena Knyazeva (2000). Synergetik: Zwischen Reduktionismus Und Holismus. Philosophia Naturalis 37 (1):21-44.score: 30.0
    Die philosophischen Folgerungen der Synergetik, einer interdisziplinären Theorie der Evolution und Selbstorganisation komplexer nichtlinearer Systeme, werden in diesem Artikel zur Diskussion gestellt. Das sind der weltanschauliche Sinn des Begriffs von der „Nichtlinearität“, die konstruktive Rolle des Chaos in der Evolution, eine neue Vorstellung von diskreten Spektren evolutionärer Wege in komplexen Systemen, die Prinzipien des Aufbaus von komplexem evolutionärem Ganzen, der Integration von komplexen Strukturen, die sich mit verschiedenen Geschwindigkeiten entwickeln, die Methoden des nichtlinearen Managements komplexer Systeme. Die Synergetik entdeckt allgemeingültige (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  94. Carl Gillett (2010). Strong Emergence as a Defese of Non-Reductive Physicalism. Principia 6 (1):89-120.score: 30.0
    Jaegwon Kim, and others, have recently posed a powerful challenge to both emergentism and non-reductive physicalism by providing arguments that these positons are committed to an untenabie combination of both 'upward' and 'dounward' determination. In section 1, I illuminate how the nature of the realization relation underlies such skeptical arguments However, in section 2, I suggest that such conclusions involve a confusion between the implications of physicalism and those of a related thesis in 'Completeness of Physics' (CoP). I show tht (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  95. Siegfried J. Schmidt (2010). The Self-Organisation of Human Communication. In Colin B. Grant (ed.), Beyond Universal Pragmatics: Studies in the Philosophy of Communication. Peter Lang.score: 30.0
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  96. Jenann Ismael (2006). Saving the Baby: Dennett on Autobiography, Agency, and the Self. Philosophical Psychology 19 (3):345-360.score: 27.0
    Dennett argues that the decentralized view of human cognitive organization finding increasing support in parts of cognitive science undermines talk of an inner self. On his view, the causal underpinnings of behavior are distributed across a collection of autonomous subsystems operating without any centralized supervision. Selves are fictions contrived to simplify description and facilitate prediction of behavior with no real correlate inside the mind. Dennett often uses an analogy with termite colonies whose behavior looks organized and purposeful to the external (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  97. Amelie Oksenberg Rorty (1972). Belief and Self-Deception. Inquiry 15 (1-4):387-410.score: 27.0
    In Part I, I consider the normal contexts of assertions of belief and declarations of intentions, arguing that many action-guiding beliefs are accepted uncritically and even pre-consciously. I analyze the function of avowals as expressions of attempts at self-transformation. It is because assertions of beliefs are used to perform a wide range of speech acts besides that of speaking the truth, and because there is a large area of indeterminacy in such assertions, that self-deception is possible. In Part II, I (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  98. Robert Clowes (2007). A Self-Regulation Model of Inner Speech and its Role in the Organisation of Human Conscious Experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 14 (7):59-71.score: 26.0
    This paper argues for the importance of inner speech in a proper understanding of the structure of human conscious experience. It reviews one recent attempt to build a model of inner speech based on a grammaticization model (Steels, 2003) and compares it with a self-regulation model here proposed. This latter model is located within the broader literature on the role of language in cognition and the inner voice in consciousness. I argue that this role is not limited to checking the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  99. Sharmila Savarimuthu, Maryam Purvis, Martin Purvis & Bastin Tony Roy Savarimuthu (forthcoming). Gossip-Based Self-Organising Agent Societies and the Impact of False Gossip. Minds and Machines:1-23.score: 26.0
    The objective of this work is to demonstrate how cooperative sharers and uncooperative free riders can be placed in different groups of an electronic society in a decentralised manner. We have simulated an agent-based open and decentralised P2P system which self-organises itself into different groups to avoid cooperative sharers being exploited by uncooperative free riders. This approach encourages sharers to move to better groups and restricts free riders into those groups of sharers without needing centralised control. Our approach is suitable (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  100. Ehud Lamm (2010). Genes Versus Genomes: The Role of Genome Organization in Evolution. Dissertation, Tel Aviv Universityscore: 24.0
    Recent and not so recent advances in our molecular understanding of the genome make the once prevalent view of the genome as a passive container of genetic information (i.e., genes) untenable, and emphasize the importance of the internal organization and re-organization dynamics of the genome for both development and evolution. While this conclusion is by now well accepted, the construction of a comprehensive conceptual framework for studying the genome as a dynamic system, capable of self-organization and adaptive behavior is (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 100 / 1000