Search results for 'self-organization' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Sort by:
  1. Andrew A. Fingelkurts, Alexander A. Fingelkurts & Carlos F. H. Neves (2013). Consciousness as a Phenomenon in the Operational Architectonics of Brain Organization: Criticality and Self-Organization Considerations. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 55:13-31.score: 240.0
    In this paper we aim to show that phenomenal consciousness is realized by a particular level of brain operational organization and that understanding human consciousness requires a description of the laws of the immediately underlying neural collective phenomena, the nested hierarchy of electromagnetic fields of brain activity – operational architectonics. We argue that the subjective mental reality and the objective neurobiological reality, although seemingly worlds apart, are intimately connected along a unified metastable continuum and are both guided by the universal (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Francis Heylighen (2010). The Self-Organization of Time and Causality: Steps Towards Understanding the Ultimate Origin. [REVIEW] Foundations of Science 15 (4):345-356.score: 240.0
    Possibly the most fundamental scientific problem is the origin of time and causality. The inherent difficulty is that all scientific theories of origins and evolution consider the existence of time and causality as given. We tackle this problem by starting from the concept of self-organization, which is seen as the spontaneous emergence of order out of primordial chaos. Self-organization can be explained by the selective retention of invariant or consistent variations, implying a breaking of the initial symmetry exhibited (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Robert C. Richardson (2001). Complexity, Self-Organization and Selection. Biology and Philosophy 16 (5):653-682.score: 240.0
    Recent work on self organization promises an explanation of complex order which is independent of adaptation. Self-organizing systems are complex systems of simple units, projecting order as a consequence of localized and generally nonlinear interactions between these units. Stuart Kauffman offers one variation on the theme of self-organization, offering what he calls a ``statistical mechanics'' for complex systems. This paper explores the explanatory strategies deployed in this ``statistical mechanics,'' initially focusing on the autonomy of statistical explanation as it applies (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Bruce H. Weber & David J. Depew (1996). Natural Selection and Self-Organization. Biology and Philosophy 11 (1):33-65.score: 240.0
    The Darwinian concept of natural selection was conceived within a set of Newtonian background assumptions about systems dynamics. Mendelian genetics at first did not sit well with the gradualist assumptions of the Darwinian theory. Eventually, however, Mendelism and Darwinism were fused by reformulating natural selection in statistical terms. This reflected a shift to a more probabilistic set of background assumptions based upon Boltzmannian systems dynamics. Recent developments in molecular genetics and paleontology have put pressure on Darwinism once again. Current work (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Bernard Feltz (ed.) (2006). Self-Organization and Emergence in Life Sciences (Synthese Library, Volume 331). Dordrecht: Springer.score: 240.0
    Historical aspects of the issue are also broached. Intuitions relative to self-organization can be found in the works of such key Western philosophical figures as Aristotle, Leibniz and Kant. Interacting with more recent authors and cybernetics, self-organization represents a notion in keeping with the modern world’s discovery of radical complexity. The themes of teleology and emergence are analyzed by philosophers of sciences with regards to the issues of modelization and scientific explanation. (publisher, edited).
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. David Kahn (2013). Brain Basis of Self: Self-Organization and Lessons From Dreaming. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 240.0
    Through dreaming a different facet of the self is created as a result of a self-organizing process in the brain. Self-organization in biological systems often happens as an answer to an environmental change for which the existing system cannot cope; self-organization creates a system that can cope in the newly changed environment. In dreaming, self-organization serves the function of organizing disparate memories into a dream since the dreamer herself is not able to control how individual memories become (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Fabian Chersi, Marcello Ferro, Giovanni Pezzulo & Vito Pirrelli (2014). Topological Self‐Organization and Prediction Learning Support Both Action and Lexical Chains in the Brain. Topics in Cognitive Science 6 (3):476-491.score: 228.0
    A growing body of evidence in cognitive psychology and neuroscience suggests a deep interconnection between sensory-motor and language systems in the brain. Based on recent neurophysiological findings on the anatomo-functional organization of the fronto-parietal network, we present a computational model showing that language processing may have reused or co-developed organizing principles, functionality, and learning mechanisms typical of premotor circuit. The proposed model combines principles of Hebbian topological self-organization and prediction learning. Trained on sequences of either motor or linguistic units, (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Iris van Rooij (2012). Self-Organization Takes Time Too. Topics in Cognitive Science 4 (1):63-71.score: 216.0
    Four articles in this issue of topiCS (volume 4, issue 1) argue against a computational approach in cognitive science in favor of a dynamical approach. I concur that the computational approach faces some considerable explanatory challenges. Yet the dynamicists’ proposal that cognition is self-organized seems to only go so far in addressing these challenges. Take, for instance, the hypothesis that cognitive behavior emerges when brain and body (re-)configure to satisfy task and environmental constraints. It is known that for certain systems (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Stanley Krippner & Allan Combs (2000). Self-Organization in the Dreaming Brain. Journal of Mind and Behavior 21 (4):399-412.score: 210.0
  10. Benjamin S. Glick (2014). Integrated Self‐Organization of Transitional ER and Early Golgi Compartments. Bioessays 36 (2):129-133.score: 210.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Srinivasan Rajaraman John G. Holden (2012). The Self-Organization of a Spoken Word. Frontiers in Psychology 3.score: 210.0
    Pronunciation time probability density and hazard functions from large speeded word naming data sets were assessed for empirical patterns consistent with multiplicative and reciprocal feedback dynamics—interaction dominant dynamics. Lognormal and inverse power-law distributions are associated with multiplicative and interdependent dynamics in many natural systems. Mixtures of lognormal and inverse power-law distributions offered better descriptions of the participant’s distributions than the ex-Gaussian or ex- Wald—alternatives corresponding to additive, superposed, component processes. The evidence for interaction dominant dynamics suggests fundamental links between the (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Ping Li, Xiaowei Zhao & Brian Mac Whinney (2007). Dynamic Self‐Organization and Early Lexical Development in Children. Cognitive Science 31 (4):581-612.score: 210.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Christopher J. May, Michelle Burgard & Imran Abbasi (2011). Teaching Complexity Theory Through Student Construction of a Course Wiki: The Self-Organization of a Scale-Free Network. Complexity 16 (3):41-48.score: 210.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Sergio Pissanetzky (2011). Emergence and Self‐Organization in Partially Ordered Sets. Complexity 17 (2):19-38.score: 210.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Mikhail Prokopenko, Fabio Boschetti & Alex J. Ryan (2009). An Information‐Theoretic Primer on Complexity, Self‐Organization, and Emergence. Complexity 15 (1):11-28.score: 210.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Núria Forns (2010). The Self‐Organization of Genomes. Complexity 15 (5):34-36.score: 210.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Carlos Gershenson & Nelson Fernandez (2012). Complexity and Information: Measuring Emergence, Self‐Organization, and Homeostasis at Multiple Scales. Complexity 18 (2):29-44.score: 210.0
    No categories
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Jinyun Ke, James W. Minett, Ching‐Pong Au & William S.‐Y. Wang (2002). Self‐Organization and Selection in the Emergence of Vocabulary. Complexity 7 (3):41-54.score: 210.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Hossein Mobahi, Majid Nili Ahmadabadi & Babak Nadjar Araabi (2006). Swarm Contours: A Fast Self-Organization Approach for Snake Initialization. Complexity 12 (1):41-52.score: 210.0
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Clément Moulin-Frier, Sao M. Nguyen & Pierre-Yves Oudeyer (2014). Self-Organization of Early Vocal Development in Infants and Machines: The Role of Intrinsic Motivation. Frontiers in Psychology 4.score: 210.0
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Ricard V. Solé (2010). Genome Size, Self‐Organization and DNA's Dark Matter. Complexity 16 (1):20-23.score: 210.0
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Ralph D. Ellis (1999). Why Isn't Consciousness Empirically Observable? Emotion, Self-Organization, and Nonreductive Physicalism. Journal of Mind and Behavior 20 (4):391-402.score: 198.0
  23. Daniéle Bourcier & Gérard Clergue (1999). From a Rule-Based Conception to Dynamic Patterns. Analyzing the Self-Organization of Legal Systems. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7 (2-3):211-225.score: 194.0
    The representation of knowledge in the law has basically followed a rule-based logical-symbolic paradigm. This paper aims to show how the modeling of legal knowledge can be re-examined using connectionist models, from the perspective of the theory of the dynamics of unstable systems and chaos. We begin by showing the nature of the paradigm shift from a rule-based approach to one based on dynamic structures and by discussing how this would translate into the field of theory of law. In order (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Ralph D. Ellis (2000). Consciousness, Self-Organization, and the Process-Substratum Relation: Rethinking Nonreductive Physicalism. Philosophical Psychology 13 (2):173-190.score: 192.0
    Knowing only what is empirically knowable can't by itself entail knowledge of what consciousness "is like." But if dualism is to be avoided, the question arises: how can a process be completely empirically unobservable when all of its components are completely observable? The recently emerging theory of self-organization offers resources with which to resolve this problem: Consciousness can be an empirically unobservable process because the emotions motivating attention are experienced only from the perspective of the one whose phenomenal states (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Henri Atlan (2011). Selected Writings on Self-Organization, Philosophy, Bioethics, and Judaism. Fordham University Press.score: 192.0
    Self-organization -- Organisms, finalisms, programs, machines -- Spinoza -- Judaism, determinism, and rationalities -- Fabricating the living -- Ethics.
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Meng-Hsiang Hsu & Feng-Yang Kuo (2003). The Effect of Organization-Based Self-Esteem and Deindividuation in Protecting Personal Information Privacy. Journal of Business Ethics 42 (4):305 - 320.score: 192.0
    In this research we apply the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) to study decisions related to information privacy protection. A TPB-based model was proposed to investigate whether organization-based self-esteem and perceived deindividuation can be employed to measure the strength of the perceived behavioral control construct. In addition, we examined if the addition of a causal path linking subjective norms to attitudes and another causal path linking organization-based self-esteem to subjective norms enhanced our research model's predicting power. Our study shows that (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Bernadette Bensaude-Vincent (2009). Self-Assembly, Self-Organization: Nanotechnology and Vitalism. [REVIEW] NanoEthics 3 (1):31-42.score: 180.0
    Over the past decades, self-assembly has attracted a lot of research attention and transformed the relations between chemistry, materials science and biology. The paper explores the impact of the current interest in self-assembly techniques on the traditional debate over the nature of life. The first section describes three different research programs of self-assembly in nanotechnology in order to characterize their metaphysical implications: (1) Hybridization (using the building blocks of living systems for making devices and machines) ; (2) Biomimetics (making artifacts (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Randall Whitaker, Self Organization, Autopoiesis, and Enterprises.score: 180.0
    'Self organization' is a popular theme in current studies of human social activity, enterprises, and information technology (IT). This document introduces one well developed theory of self organization (autopoietic theory) and discusses its application to enterprises and their management.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. J. B. Edelmann & M. J. Denton (2007). The Uniqueness of Biological Self-Organization: Challenging the Darwinian Paradigm. Biology and Philosophy 22 (4):579-601.score: 180.0
    Here we discuss the challenge posed by self-organization to the Darwinian conception of evolution. As we point out, natural selection can only be the major creative agency in evolution if all or most of the adaptive complexity manifest in living organisms is built up over many generations by the cumulative selection of naturally occurring small, random mutations or variants, i.e., additive, incremental steps over an extended period of time. Biological self-organization—witnessed classically in the folding of a protein, or (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Nicolas Glade (forthcoming). On the Nature and Shape of Tubulin Trails: Implications on Microtubule Self-Organization. Acta Biotheoretica.score: 180.0
    Abstract Microtubules, major elements of the cell skeleton are, most of the time, well organized in vivo, but they can also show self-organizing behaviors in time and/or space in purified solutions in vitro. Theoretical studies and models based on the concepts of collective dynamics in complex systems, reaction–diffusion processes and emergent phenomena were proposed to explain some of these behaviors. In the particular case of microtubule spatial self-organization, it has been advanced that microtubules could behave like ants, self-organizing by (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. J. T. Ismael (2011). Self-Organization and Self-Governance. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 41 (3):327-351.score: 180.0
    The intuitive difference between a system that choreographs the motion of its parts in the service of goals of its own formulation and a system composed of a collection of parts doing their own thing without coordination has been shaken by now familiar examples of self-organization. There is a broad and growing presumption in parts of philosophy and across the sciences that the appearance of centralized information-processing and control in the service of system-wide goals is mere appearance, i.e., an (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Peter C. M. Molenaar & Han L. J. van der Maas (2000). Neural Constructivism or Self-Organization? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):783-784.score: 180.0
    Three arguments are given to show that neural constructivism lacks an essential ingredient to explain cognitive development. Based on results in the theory of adaptive signal analysis, adaptive biological pattern information and self-organization in nonlinear systems of information processing, it is concluded that neural constructivism should be further extended to accommodate the occurrence of phase transitions generating qualitative development in the sense of Piaget.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. János Szentágothai (1993). Self-Organization: The Basic Principle of Neural Functions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 14 (2).score: 180.0
    Recent neurophysiological observations are giving rise to the expectation that in the near future genuine biological experiments may contribute more than will premature speculations to the understanding of global and cognitive functions. The classical reflex principle — as the basis of neural functions — has to yield to new ideas, like autopoiesis and/or self-organization, as the basic paradigm in the framework of which the essence of the neural can be better understood. Neural activity starts in the very earliest stages (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. Christian Fuchs (2002). Some Implications of Anthony Giddens' Works for a Theory of Social Self-Organization. Emergence 4 (3):7-35.score: 180.0
    (2002). Some Implications of Anthony Giddens' Works for a Theory of Social Self-Organization. Emergence: Vol. 4, No. 3, pp. 7-35. doi: 10.1207/S15327000EM0403-03.
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Sylvie Geisendorf (2009). The Economic Concept of Evolution: Self-Organization or Universal Darwinism? Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (4):377-391.score: 180.0
    Somewhat surprisingly, evolutionary economists are far from agreeing upon the economic concept of evolution. The debate revolves around the question whether the mechanisms of variation, selection and retention are general principles of evolutionary processes, also valid in economics, or if economic evolution can be described by self-organization. The paper argues that self-organization is a useful concept, but has not yet fulfilled the aspiration to describe economic evolution as an endogenous process. In self-organization models important aspects, like novelty (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Carl N. Johnson & Melanie Nyhof (2006). Transcendental Self-Organization. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (5):478-478.score: 180.0
    Bering makes a good case for turning attention to an organized system that provides the self with transcendental meaning. In focusing on the evolutionary basis of this system, however, he overlooks the self-organizing properties of cognitive systems themselves. We propose that the illusory system Bering describes can be more generally and parsimoniously viewed as an emergent by-product of self-organization, with no need for specialized “illusion by design.”.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Robert E. Page & Sandra D. Mitchell (1990). Self Organization and Adaptation in Insect Societies. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:289 - 298.score: 180.0
    Division of labor and its associated phenomena have been viewed as prime examples of group-level adaptations. However, the adaptations are the result of the process of evolution by natural selection and thus require that groups of insects once existed and competed for reproduction, some of which had a heritable division of labor while others did not. We present models, based on those of Kauffman (1984) that demonstrate how division of labor may occur spontaneously among groups of mutually tolerant individuals. We (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. A. O. Barut (1987). Irreversibility, Organization, and Self-Organization in Quantum Electrodynamics. Foundations of Physics 17 (6):549-559.score: 180.0
    QED is a fundamental microscopic theory satisfying all the conservation laws and discrete symmetries C, P, T. Yet, dissipative phenomena, organization, and self-organization occur even at this basic microscopic two-body level. How these processes come about and how they are described in QED is discussed. A possible new phase of QED due to self-energy effects leading to self-organization is predicted.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. John Collier, Fundamental Properties of Self-Organization.score: 180.0
    In these notes I want to address some issues concerning self-organization that seem to me to apply generally from the micro-physical through the biological and social to the cosmological. That is, they are a part of the general theory of self-organization. I prefer to distinguish the theory of selforganization from the analysis of the concept of self-organization (which Maturana claims is oxymoronic, since there is no self that organizes1). General usage gives us something to which the term (...)
    No categories
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. E. Bernard-Weil (1995). Self-Organization and Emergence Are Some Irrelevant Concepts Without Their Association with the Concepts of Hetero-Organization and Immergence. Acta Biotheoretica 43 (4).score: 180.0
    There are many reasons for questioning the relevance of the concepts of self-organization (SO) and emergence. By studying three types of SO, respectively related to ontogeny, phylogeny and formalized models, we show that we always have to suppose an associated hetero-organization and preconceived immergence, unconsciously present in the authors mind. In order to understand how these unusual couples are working, they must be considered as agonistic antagonistic couples. Heteroorganization and immergence put constraints on the system so that SO and (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. R. I. Damper (1998). Self-Learning and Self-Organization as Tools for Speech Research. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):262-263.score: 180.0
    Locus equations offer promise for an understanding of at least some aspects of perceptual invariance in speech, but they were discovered almost fortuitously. With the present availability of powerful machine learning algorithms, ignorance-based automatic discovery procedures are starting to supplant knowledge-based scientific inquiry. Principles of self-learning and self-organization are powerful tools for speech research but remain somewhat under-utilized.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  42. Philip Anderson & Jack Cohen (1999). Reviews: Coping with Uncertainty, Insights From the New Sciences of Chaos, Self-Organization, and Complexity, Uri Merry. [REVIEW] Emergence 1 (2):106-108.score: 180.0
    (1999). Reviews: Coping with Uncertainty, Insights from the New Sciences of Chaos, Self-Organization, and Complexity, Uri Merry. Emergence: Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 106-108.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Stanley N. Salthe (1988). Modeling Self -Organization. Semiotics:14-23.score: 180.0
    Foremost among the tasks facing a semiotically-informed modeling of natural open systems is the recognition and representation of self-organization. This forces attention on process, time, and energetics to complement the conventional semiotic bias toward structure, space, and informatics. While self -organization might be captured in numerous operational idioms, we suggest that the fundamentally distinctive formal structures of (a) development (intrinsic predictability) and (b) evolution (unexpected change through change in contextual meaning) constitute thewarp and woof of virtually all observations on (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. Francisco Biasdie & Mario Sergio Rocha (1999). Information Self-Organization and Consciousness—Towards a Holoinformational Theory of Consciousness. World Futures 53 (4):309-327.score: 180.0
    (1999). Information self‐organization and consciousness—towards a holoinformational theory of consciousness. World Futures: Vol. 53, No. 4, pp. 309-327.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. L. Leydesdorff (2012). Radical Constructivism and Radical Constructedness: Luhmann's Sociology of Semantics, Organizations, and Self-Organization. Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):85-92.score: 180.0
    Context: Using radical constructivism, society can be considered from the perspective of asking the question, “Who conceives of society?” In Luhmann’s social systems theory, this question itself is considered as a construct of the communication among reflexive agents. Problem: Structuration of expectations by codes operating in interhuman communications positions both communicators and communications in a multi-dimensional space in which their relations can be provided with meaning at the supra-individual level. The codes can be functionally different and symbolically generalized. Method: More (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Kyungrock Paik & Praveen Kumar (2008). Emergence of Self-Similar Tree Network Organization. Complexity 13 (4):30-37.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. M. Thieullen (2009). Self Organization and Evolution in Mathematical Models. In Maryvonne Gérin & Marie-Christine Maurel (eds.), Origins of Life: Self-Organization and/or Biological Evolution? Edp Sciences. 37--46.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Ignazio Masulli (1993). Towards a Theory of Self-Organization of Natural and Social Systems: The Theory of Form. World Futures 38 (1):139-148.score: 180.0
    (1993). Towards a theory of self‐organization of natural and Social systems: The theory of form. World Futures: Vol. 38, Theoretical Achievements and Practical Applications of General Evolutionary Theory, pp. 139-148.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Anders Michelsen (2007). Autotranscendence and Creative Organization: On Self-Creation and Self-Organization. Thesis Eleven 88 (1):55-75.score: 180.0
    This article discusses the issue of social and cultural ‘autotranscendence’ - self-production, creativity - in the debates on self-organization. The point of departure is Cornelius Castoriadis’s idea of ‘self-creation’. First, a schisma between mechanical and ontological modeling is indicated and used to introduce the idea of a ‘creative organization’. This is further discussed in relation to Jean-Pierre Dupuy’s concept of social ‘autotranscendence’ by ‘complex methodological individualism’, with particular respect to the incomprehension of the social. Following Johann P. Arnason’s treatment (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  50. Dimitris Stassinopoulos, Per Bak & Preben Alstrøm (1994). Self-Organization and Pavlov's Dogs. A Simple Model of the Brain. In Karl H. Pribram (ed.), Origins: Brain and Self-Organization. Lawrence Erlbaum. 172.score: 180.0
    No categories
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 1000