Search results for 'tropes' (try it on Scholar)

459 found
Sort by:
See also:
Bibliography: Tropes in Metaphysics
  1. Bence Nanay (2012). Perceiving Tropes. Erkenntnis 77 (1):1-14.score: 24.0
    There are two very different ways of thinking about perception. According to the first one, perception is representational: it represents the world as being a certain way. According to the second, perception is a genuine relation between the perceiver and a token object. These two views are thought to be incompatible. My aim is to work out the least problematic version of the representational view of perception that preserves the most important considerations in favor of the relational view. According to (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  2. Tuomas E. Tahko (2013). Tropes: Properties, Objects, and Mental Causation. By Douglas Ehring. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 63 (251):379-382.score: 24.0
    Book review of 'Tropes: Properties, Objects, and Mental Causation' (2011, OUP). By DOUGLAS EHRING.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  3. Uriah Kriegel (2005). Tropes and Facts. Metaphysica 6:83-90.score: 24.0
    The notion that there is a single type of entity in terms of which the whole world can be described has fallen out of favor in recent Ontology. There are only two serious exceptions to this. Factualists (Skyrms 1981, Armstrong 1997) hold that the world can be fully described in terms of facts. Trope theorists (Williams 1953, Campbell 1981, 1990) hold that it can be fully described in terms of tropes. Yet the relationship between facts and tropes remains (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  4. Friederike Moltmann (2013). Tropes, Bare Demonstratives, and Apparent Statements of Identity. Noûs 47 (2):346-370.score: 24.0
    Philosophers who accept tropes generally agree that tropes act as the objects of reference of nominalizations of adjectives, such as 'Socrates’ wisdom' or 'the beauty of the landscape'. This paper argues that tropes play a further important role in the semantics of natural language, namely in the semantics of bare demonstratives like 'this' and 'that' in what in linguistics is called identificational sentences.
    Direct download (10 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  5. Friederike Moltmann (2012). Tropes, Intensional Relative Clauses, and the Notion of a Variable Object. In Aloni Maria, Kimmelman Vadim, Weidman Sassoon Galit, Roloefson Floris, Schulz Katrin & Westera Matthjis (eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Amsterdam Colloquium 2011. Springer.score: 24.0
    NPs with intensional relative clauses such as 'the impact of the book John needs to write' pose a significant challenge for trope theory (the theory of particularized properties), since they seem to refer to tropes that lack an actual bearer. This paper proposes a novel semantic analysis of such NPs on the basis of the notion of a variable object. The analysis avoids a range of difficulties that an alternative analysis based on the notion of an individual concept would (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  6. Vassilios Livanios (2007). Tropes, Particularity, and Space-Time. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 38 (2):357 - 368.score: 24.0
    Several difficulties, concerning the individuation and the variation of tropes, beset the initial classic version of trope theory. K. Campbell (Abstract particulars, Oxford, Basil Blackwell, 1990) presented a modified version that aims to avoid those difficulties. Unfortunately, the revised theory cannot make the case that one of the fundamental tropes, space-time, is a genuine particular.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  7. Douglas Ehring (2011). Tropes: Properties, Objects, and Mental Causation. OUP Oxford.score: 24.0
    Properties and objects are everywhere. We cannot take a step without walking into them; we cannot construct a theory in science without referring to them. Given their ubiquitous character, one might think that there would be a standard metaphysical account of properties and objects, but they remain a philosophical mystery. Douglas Ehring presents a defense of tropes--properties and relations understood as particulars--and of trope bundle theory as the best accounts of properties and objects, and advocates a specific brand of (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  8. Daniel Giberman (2014). Tropes in Space. Philosophical Studies 167 (2):453-472.score: 24.0
    Tropes are particular features of concrete objects. Properties—the extensions of predicates—are primitive resemblance classes of tropes. Friends of tropes have been criticized for failing to answer three questions. First, are there fundamental items other than tropes? Second, what criteria determine whether some tropes are all and only the features of some one object? Third, can trope classes be formed adequately using only primitive resemblance? Trading on the spatiotemporal status of tropes, this essay offers new (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  9. Friederike Moltmann (forthcoming). States Versus Tropes. Comments on C. Anderson and M. Morzycki: 'Degrees as Kinds'. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.score: 24.0
    In their paper ‘Degrees as Kinds’, Anderson and Morzycki, demonstrate how certain constructions in a range of languages treat kinds, manners, and degrees alike. Their proposal is to identify degrees with kinds of states and they consider states to be interchangeable with tropes. In these comments, I will raise some issues about the interchangeability of (concrete) states and tropes as well as the category of concrete states as well as Anderson and Morzycki's analysis of the comparative.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  10. Johannes Persson (2005). Tropes as Mechanisms. Foundations of Science 10 (4):371-393.score: 24.0
    This paper is an attempt to further our understanding of mechanisms conceived of as ontologically separable from laws. What opportunities are there for a mechanistic perspective to be independent of, or even more fundamental than, a law perspective? Advocates of the mechanistic view often play with the possibility of internal and external reliability, or with the paralleling possibilities of enforcing, counteracting, redirecting, etc., the mechanisms’ power to produce To further this discussion I adopt a trope ontology. It is independent of (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  11. Simone Gozzano & Francesco Orilia (eds.) (2008). Universals, Tropes and the Philosophy of Mind. Ontos Verlag.score: 24.0
    Table of Contents; Introduction by Francesco Orilia and Simone Gozzano; Modes and Mind by John Heil; Does Ontology Matter? by Anna-Sofia Maurin; Basic Ontology, Multiple Realizability and Mental Causation by Francesco Orilia; The “Supervenience Argument”:Kim’s Challenge to Nonreductive Physicalism by Ausonio Marras and Juhani Yli-Vakkuri; Tropes’ Simplicity and Mental Causation by Simone Gozzano; Zombies from Below by David Robb; Tropes and Perception by E. Jonathan Lowe; About the authors.
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  12. Michael Anthony Istvan (2011). On the Possibility of Exactly Similar Tropes. Abstracta 6 (2):158-177.score: 24.0
    In this paper I attempt to show, against certain versions of trope theory, that properties with analyzable particularity cannot be merely exactly similar: such properties are either particularized properties (tropes) that are dissimilar to every any other trope, or else universalized properties (universals). I argue that each of the most viable standard and nonstandard particularizers that can be employed to secure the numerical difference between exactly similar properties can only succeed in grounding the particularity of properties, that is, in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  13. Friederike Moltmann (2013). On the Distinction Between Abstract States, Concrete States, and Tropes. In Claire Beyssade, Mari Alda & Del Prete Fabio (eds.), Genericity. Oxford University Press. 292-311.score: 22.0
    This paper defends a distinction between ‘abstract states’ and ‘concrete states’, following Maienborn (2005, 2007) in her account of the peculiar semantic behavior of stative verbs. The paper proposes an ontological account of the notion of an abstract state and discusses how it relates to the notion of a trope or particularized property, which has so far been neglected in the semantic literature on stative verbs.
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  14. Jiri Benovsky (2014). Tropes or Universals: How (Not) to Make One's Choice. Metaphilosophy 45 (1):69-86.score: 22.0
    This article discusses a familiar version of trope theory as opposed to a familiar version of the theory of universals, examining how these two rivals address the problem of “attribute agreement”—a problem that has been at the root of the very reason for developing these theories in the first place. The article shows that there is not much of a difference between the ways these two theories handle the problem, and in a more general way it argues that there is (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  15. Vera Tripodi (2009). Thinking Gender Categories as Tropes. Rivista di Filosofia 3 (3):347-372.score: 21.0
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  16. Friederike Moltmann (2004). Properties and Kinds of Tropes: New Linguistic Facts and Old Philosophical Insights. Mind 113 (449):1-41.score: 20.0
    Terms such as 'wisdom' or 'happiness' are commonly held to refer to abstract objects that are properties. On the basis of a greater range of linguistic data and with the support of some ancient and medieval philosophical views, I argue that such terms do not stand for objects, but rather for kinds of tropes, entities that do not have the status of objects, but only play a role as semantic values of terms and as arguments of predicates. Such ‘non-objects’ (...)
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  17. Robert K. Garcia (2014). Tropes and Dependency Profiles: Problems for the Nuclear Theory of Substance. American Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2):167-176.score: 18.0
    In this article I examine the compatibility of a leading trope bundle theory of substance, so-called Nuclear Theory, with trope theory more generally. Peter Simons (1994) originally proposed Nuclear Theory (NT), and continues to develop (1998, 2000) and maintain (2002/03) the view. Recently, building on Simons’s theory, Markku Keinänen (2011) has proposed what he calls the Strong Nuclear Theory (SNT). Although the latter is supposed to shore up some of NT’s weaknesses, it continues to maintain NT’s central tenet, the premise (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  18. Markku Keinänen (2011). Tropes – The Basic Constituents of Powerful Particulars? Dialectica 65 (3):419-450.score: 18.0
    This article presents a trope bundle theory of simple substances, the Strong Nuclear Theory[SNT] building on the schematic basis offered by Simons's (1994) Nuclear Theory[NT]. The SNT adopts Ellis's (2001) dispositional essentialist conception of simple substances as powerful particulars: all of their monadic properties are dispositional. Moreover, simple substances necessarily belong to some natural kind with a real essence formed by monadic properties. The SNT develops further the construction of substances the NT proposes to obtain an adequate trope bundle theory (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  19. Thomas Mormann (1995). Trope Sheaves. A Topological Ontology of Tropes. Logic and Logical Philosophy of Science 3:129-150.score: 18.0
    In this paper I want to show that topology has a bearing on the theory of tropes. More precisely, I propose a topological ontology of tropes. This is to be understood as follows: trope ontology is a „one-category”-ontology countenancing only one kind of basic entities, to wit, tropes. 1 Hence, individuals, properties, relations, etc. are to be constructed from tropes.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  20. Simone Gozzano (2008). Tropes' Simplicity and Mental Causation. Ontos Verlag.score: 18.0
    In this paper I first try to clarify the essential features of tropes and then I use the resulting analysis to cope with the problem of mental causation. As to the first step, I argue that tropes, beside being essentially particular and abstract, are simple, where such a simplicity can be considered either from a phenomenal point of view or from a structural point of view. Once this feature is spelled out, the role tropes may play in (...)
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  21. Jonathan Schaffer (2001). The Individuation of Tropes. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (2):247 – 257.score: 18.0
    A tropel is a particular property: the redness of a rose, the roundness of the moon. It is generally supposed that tropes are individuated by primitive quantity: this redness, that roundness. I argme that the trope theorist is far better served by individuating tropes by spatiotemporal relation: here redness, there roundness. In short, tropes are not this-suches but here-suches.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  22. Anna-Sofia Maurin (2011). An Argument for the Existence of Tropes. Erkenntnis 74 (1):69-79.score: 18.0
    That there could be ontologically complex concrete particulars is self-evidently true. A reductio may however be formulated which contradicts this truth. In this paper I argue that all of the reasonable ways in which we might refute this reductio will require the existence of at least some tropes.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  23. Kris McDaniel (2001). Tropes and Ordinary Physical Objects. Philosophical Studies 104 (3):269-290.score: 18.0
    I argue that a solution to puzzles concerning the relationship ofobjects and their properties – a version of the `bundle' theory ofparticulars according to which ordinary objects are mereologicalfusions of monadic and relational tropes – is also a solution topuzzles of material constitution involving the allegedco-location of material objects. Additionally, two argumentsthat have played a prominent role in shaping the current debate,Mark Heller's argument for Four Dimensionalism and Peter vanInwagen's argument against Mereological Universalism, are shownto be unsound given this (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  24. Friederike Moltmann (2007). Events, Tropes, and Truthmaking. Philosophical Studies 134 (3):363-403.score: 18.0
    Nominalizations are expressions that are particularly challenging philosophically in that they help form singular terms that seem to refer to abstract or derived objects often considered controversial. The three standard views about the semantics of nominalizations are [1] that they map mere meanings onto objects, [2] that they refer to implicit arguments, and [3] that they introduce new objects, in virtue of their compositional semantics. In the second case, nominalizations do not add anything new but pick up objects that would (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  25. Anna-Sofia Maurin (2002). If Tropes. Dissertation, Lund Universityscore: 18.0
    The treatise attempts to approach and deal with some of the most fundamental problems facing anyone who wishes to uphold some version of the so-called theory of tropes. Three assumptions serve as a basis for the investigation: (i) tropes (i.e. particular properties) exist, (ii) only tropes exist (that is, tropes are the only basic or fundamental kinds of entities), and (iii) a one-category trope-theory along these lines should be developed so that the tropes it postulates (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  26. Ross Cameron (2006). Tropes, Necessary Connections, and Non-Transferability. Dialectica 60 (2):99–113.score: 18.0
    In this paper I examine whether the Humean denial of necessary connections between wholly distinct contingent existents poses problems for a theory of tropes. In section one I consider the substance-attribute theory of tropes. I distinguish first between three versions of the non-transferability of a trope from the substratum in which it inheres and then between two versions of the denial of necessary connections. I show that the most plausible combination of these views is consistent. In section two (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  27. Arda Denkel (1997). On the Compresence of Tropes. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (3):599-606.score: 18.0
    Once we assume that objects are bundles of tropes, we want to know how the latter cohere. Are they held together by a substratum, are they linked by external relations or do they cling to one another by internal relations? This paper begins by exploring the reasons for eliminating the first two suggestions. Defending that the third option can be made plausible, it advances the following thesis: Maintaining that tropes are held in a compresence by appropriately qualified internal (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  28. Peter Alward (2008). Mopes, Dopes, and Tropes. Dialogue 47 (1):53-64.score: 18.0
    ABSTRACT: A popular strategylor resolving Kim 's exclusion problem is to suggest that mental and physical property tropes are identical despite the non-identity of the mental and physical properties themselves. I argue that mental and physical tropes can be identified without losing the dispositional character of mentality only if a dual-character hypothesis regarding the intrinsic characters of tropes is endorsed. But even with this assumption, the causaI efficacy of the wrong dispositions is secured.RÉSUMÉ: On résout habituellement le (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  29. Crawford Spence & Ian Thomson (2009). Resonance Tropes in Corporate Philanthropy Discourse. Business Ethics 18 (4):372-388.score: 18.0
    This paper explores corporate charitable giving disclosures in order to question the extent to which corporations can claim that their philanthropy activities are charitable at all. Exploration of these issues is carried out by means of a tropological analysis that focuses on the different linguistic tropes within the philanthropy disclosures of 52 companies, namely metaphor and synecdoche. The results reveal a number of complex and contradictory things. Primarily, the master metaphor of 'altruism' projected by the corporate disclosures is ideologically (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  30. Käthe Trettin (2007). Tropes and Relations. The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 12:155-159.score: 18.0
    A straightforward ontological account would be one which acknowledges relations as real beings, and that means, according to the scholastic tradition, as universals. The realist move in this sense which has been re-established within contemporary analytical ontology at least since Russell's early theory, is, however, not the only possible way to take relations seriously. In my paper I shall argue that there is much room for the ontological reconstruction of relations, even if one does not accept universals. The background for (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  31. M. J. Garcia-Encinas (2009). Tropes for Causation. Metaphysica 10 (2):157-174.score: 18.0
    Tropes, as distinguished from other possible kinds of entities such as universals, states of affairs, events and bare particulars, are best-suited to play the role of causal relata.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  32. Peter Alward (2008). Mopes, Dopes, and Tropes: A Critique of the Trope Solution to the Problem of Mental Causation. Dialogue 47 (01):53-.score: 18.0
    ABSTRACT: A popular strategylor resolving Kim 's exclusion problem is to suggest that mental and physical property tropes are identical despite the non-identity of the mental and physical properties themselves. I argue that mental and physical tropes can be identified without losing the dispositional character of mentality only if a dual-character hypothesis regarding the intrinsic characters of tropes is endorsed. But even with this assumption, the causaI efficacy of the wrong dispositions is secured.RÉSUMÉ: On résout habituellement le (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  33. Alfredo González Ruibal (ed.) (2013). Reclaiming Archaeology: Beyond the Tropes of Modernity. Routledge.score: 18.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  34. M. A. Istvan Jr (2012). Concerning the Possibility of Exactly Similar Tropes. Abstracta 6 (2):158-177.score: 18.0
    In this paper I attempt to show, against certain versions of trope theory, that properties with analyzable particularity cannot be merely exactly similar: such properties are either particularized properties (tropes) that are dissimilar to every any other trope, or else universalized properties (universals). I argue that each of the most viable standard and nonstandard particularizers that can be employed to secure the numerical difference between exactly similar properties can only succeed in grounding the particularity of properties, that is, in (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  35. Paul Noordhof (1998). Do Tropes Resolve the Problem of Mental Causation? Philosophical Quarterly 48 (191):221-26.score: 17.0
    Direct download (9 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  36. Marianne Garin (2013). Tropes et polysémie dans les Fragments d'Héraclite. Du feu dans les mondes aux feux dans les mots. Methodos 13.score: 17.0
    Cet article est né d'une double constatation, la première inspirée par l'étude du corpus d'Héraclite d'Éphèse, auteur ionien du 6ème siècle av. J.-C. dont il nous reste largement plus d'une centaine de Fragments considérés comme littéraux et censément extraits d'une œuvre dont la forme et l'ordonnance sont à ce jour inconnues, la seconde par la lecture des commentaires et interprétations qu'en proposent les spécialistes. C'est en effet en remarquant la variété des approches appliquées par les scientifiques pour parvenir à une (...)
    No categories
    Translate to English
    | Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  37. Matteo Morganti (2009). Tropes and Physics. Grazer Philosophische Studien 78 (1):185--205.score: 16.0
    Th is paper looks at quantum theory and the Standard Model of elementary particles with a view to suggesting a detailed empirical implementation of trope ontology in harmony with our best physics.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  38. Timothy Pawl (2012). Transubstantiation, Tropes and Truthmakers. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):71-96.score: 16.0
    Abstract. This article addresses a difficult case at the intersection of philosophical theology and truthmaker theory. I show that three views, together, lead to difficulties in providing truthmakers for truths of contingent predication, such as that the bread is white. These three views are: the Catholic dogma of transubstantiation, a standard truthmaker theory, and a trope (or accident) view of properties. I present and explain each of these three views, at each step noting their connections to the thought of St. (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  39. Jerrold Levinson (2006). Why There Are No Tropes. Philosophy 81 (4):563-580.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  40. Richard Cross (2005). Relations, Universals, and the Abuse of Tropes. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 79 (1):53–72.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  41. Douglas Ehring (1997). Lewis, Temporary Intrinsics and Momentary Tropes. Analysis 57 (4):254–258.score: 15.0
  42. Peter Forrest, Sets As Mereological Tropes.score: 15.0
    Either from concrete examples such as tomatoes on a plate, an egg carton full of eggs and so on, or simply because of the braces notation, we come to have some intuitions about the sorts of things sets might be. (See Maddy 1990.) First we tend to think of a set of particulars as itself a particular thing.. Second, even after the distinction between settheory and mereology has been carefully explained we tend to think of the members of a set (...)
    Translate to English
    | Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  43. Keith Campbell (2008). Review of Simone Gozzano, Francesco Orilia (Eds.), Tropes, Universals and the Philosophy of Mind: Essays at the Boundary of Ontology and Philosophical Psychology. [REVIEW] Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2008 (8).score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  44. S. C. Gibb (2012). Tropes: Properties, Objects and Mental Causation * by Douglas Ehring. Analysis 72 (4):850-851.score: 15.0
    Direct download (11 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  45. Herbert Hochberg (1992). Troubles with Tropes. Philosophical Studies 67 (2):193 - 195.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  46. Michael Kaplan (2010). The Rhetoric of Hegemony: Laclau, Radical Democracy, and the Rule of Tropes. Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (3):253-283.score: 15.0
    The work of Ernesto Laclau (both with and without his occasional collaborator, Chantal Mouffe) has exerted considerable influence in rhetorical studies over the past two decades. Emerging alongside the so-called epistemic and cultural turns, the project of "critical rhetoric" and cognate endeavors have found in Laclau a revision of Gramsci's hegemony thesis that places discursive—and thus, evidently, rhetorical—operations at the center of politics, culture, and social processes generally. While Raymie McKerrow's seminal essay (1989) drew on Laclau and Mouffe to outline (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  47. André Fuhrmann (1991). Tropes and Laws. Philosophical Studies 63 (1):57 - 82.score: 15.0
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  48. Max Kistler (2003). Laws of Nature, Exceptions and Tropes. Philosophia Scientiae 7 (2):189-219.score: 15.0
    Direct download  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
  49. Daryn Lehoux (2003). Tropes, Facts, and Empiricism. Perspectives on Science 11 (3):326-345.score: 15.0
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    My bibliography  
     
    Export citation  
1 — 50 / 459