Search results for 'truth-conditional semantics' (try it on Scholar)

1000+ found
Order:
  1. Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig (2003). Outline for a Truth-Conditional Semantics for Tense. In Quentin Smith & Aleksandar Jokic (eds.), Tense, Time and Reference. MIT 49-105.
    Our aim in the present paper is to investigate, from the standpoint of truth-theoretic semantics, English tense, temporal designators and quantifiers, and other expressions we use to relate ourselves and other things to the temporal order. Truth-theoretic semantics provides a particularly illuminating standpoint from which to discuss issues about the semantics of tense, and their relation to thoughts at, and about, times. Tense, and temporal modifiers, contribute systematically to conditions under which sentences we utter are true or (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  2.  9
    Luca Gasparri (2014). Lexical Meaning in Truth-Conditional Semantics. Diametros 39:182-202.
    The paper offers a critical review of the role played by lexical meaning in the earlier stages of philosophical semantics and truth-conditional semantics. I shall address, both historically and theoretically, the relative neglect of lexical semantics within these fields, and argue that the approach to word meaning fostered in extensional frameworks is overall inconsistent with the customary assumption that truth-theoretic semantics can be considered a semantic theory proprio sensu.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  78
    Claire Horisk (2007). The Expressive Role of Truth in Truth-Conditional Semantics. Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):535–557.
    I define 'skim semantics' to be a Davidson-style truth-conditional semantics combined with a variety of deflationism about truth. The expressive role of truth in truth-conditional semantics precludes at least some kinds of skim semantics; thus I reject the idea that the challenge to skim semantics derives solely from Davidson's explanatory ambitions, and in particular from the 'truth doctrine', the view that the concept of truth plays a central explanatory role in Davidsonian theories of (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  4.  33
    N. Asher (2000). Truth Conditional Discourse Semantics for Parentheticals. Journal of Semantics 17 (1):31-50.
    It has been often argued that parentheticals, discourse adverbials and certain parts of speech like interjections do not contribute to the truth conditional content of the assertions of which they are part. In this paper I argue that many of these constructions do contribute a truth conditional content, and I propose a semantics for parentheticals and discourse adverbials that treats these constructions similarly to SDRT's treatment of presuppositions. I also point out differences between standard presupposition triggers on the one (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  5.  14
    Paul Saka (2007). The Argument From Ignorance Against Truth-Conditional Semantics. American Philosophical Quarterly 44 (2):157 - 169.
    According to orthodox semantics, to know the meaning of a sentence is to know its truth-conditions. Against this view I observe that we typically do not know the truth-conditions of the sentences we understand. We do not know the truth-conditions, for instance, of empty definite descriptions, non-declaratives, subjunctive conditionals, causal ascriptions, belief ascriptions, probability statements, figurative language, category mistakes, normative judgments, or vague statements. Appealing to tacit knowledge does not help, for the problem goes beyond our inability to articulate (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  6.  84
    H. G. Callaway (1988). Semantic Competence and Truth-Conditional Semantics. Erkenntnis 28 (1):3 - 27.
    Davidson approaches the notions of meaning and interpretation with the aim of characterizing semantic competence in the syntactically characterized natural language. The objective is to provide a truth-theory for a language, generating T-sentences expressed in the semantic metalanguage, so that each sentence of the object language receives an appropriate interpretation. Proceeding within the constraints of referential semantics, I will argue for the viability of reconstructing the notion of linguistic meaning within the Tarskian theory of reference. However, the view proposed (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  7. Deirdre Wilson (1975). Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics. Academic Press.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   13 citations  
  8.  31
    Steven E. Boër & William G. Lycan (1980). A Performadox in Truth-Conditional Semantics. Linguistics and Philosophy 4 (1):71 - 100.
    An argument is developed at some length to show that any semantical theory which treats superficially nonperformative sentences as being governed by performative prefaces at some level of underlying structure must either leave those sentences semantically uninterpreted or assign them the wrong truth-conditions. Several possible escapes from this dilemma are examined; it is tentatively concluded that such hypotheses as the Ross-Lakoff-Sadock Performative Analysis should be rejected despite their attractions.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   7 citations  
  9.  41
    Lenny Clapp (2012). Indexical Color Predicates: Truth Conditional Semantics Vs. Truth Conditional Pragmatics. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 42 (2):71-100.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  10.  75
    Nicholas Asher (1992). A Default, Truth Conditional Semantics for the Progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (5):463 - 508.
  11.  85
    Ernest Lepore, Truth Conditional Semantics and Meaning.
  12.  31
    Finn Collin & Anders Engstrøm (2001). Metaphor and Truth-Conditional Semantics: Meaning as Process and Product. Theoria 67 (1):75-92.
  13.  19
    William G. Lycan (1989). Logical Constants and the Glory of Truth-Conditional Semantics. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 30 (3):390-400.
  14.  6
    William Demopoulos (1982). The Rejection of Truth-Conditional Semantics by Putnam and Dummett. Philosophical Topics 13 (1):135-153.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  5
    Peter Lamarque (1976). Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics.Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics. [REVIEW] Philosophical Quarterly 26 (105):379.
  16. R. L. V. Hale (1977). Presuppositions and Non‐Truth‐Conditional Semantics. Philosophical Books 18 (1):34-39.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17. Claire Horisk (2005). The Surprise Argument for Truth-Conditional Semantics. Protosociology 21.
    No categories
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18. Chris Murphy (1979). WILSON, D., "Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics". [REVIEW] Australasian Journal of Philosophy 57:183.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19. P. Smith (1977). WILSON, D. "Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics". [REVIEW] Mind 86:627.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  20. Asher Nicholas (2000). Truth Conditional Discourse Semantics for Parentheticals. Journal of Semantics 17 (1).
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  9
    Lorenzo Rossi (forthcoming). Adding a Conditional to Kripke’s Theory of Truth. Journal of Philosophical Logic:1-45.
    Kripke’s theory of truth, 690–716; 1975) has been very successful but shows well-known expressive difficulties; recently, Field has proposed to overcome them by adding a new conditional connective to it. In Field’s theories, desirable conditional and truth-theoretic principles are validated that Kripke’s theory does not yield. Some authors, however, are dissatisfied with certain aspects of Field’s theories, in particular the high complexity. I analyze Field’s models and pin down some reasons for discontent with them, focusing on the meaning of the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  22.  57
    Ralph DiFranco (2015). Do Racists Speak Truly? On the Truth‐Conditional Content of Slurs. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 4 (1):28-37.
    Slurs denigrate individuals qua members of certain groups, such as race or sexual orientation. Most theorists hold that each slur has a neutral counterpart, i.e., a term that references the slur's target group without denigrating them. According to a widely accepted view, which I call ‘Neutral Counterpart Theory’, the truth-conditional content of a slur is identical to the truth-conditional content of its neutral counterpart. My aim is to challenge this view. I argue that the view fails with respect (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  23.  57
    Tim Fernando (2001). A Type Reduction From Proof-Conditional to Dynamic Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (2):121-153.
    Dynamic and proof-conditional approaches to discourse (exemplified by Discourse Representation Theory and Type-Theoretical Grammar, respectively) are related through translations and transitions labeled by first-order formulas with anaphoric twists. Type-theoretic contexts are defined relative to a signature and instantiated modeltheoretically, subject to change.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  24.  93
    Alexis Burgess (2011). Mainstream Semantics + Deflationary Truth. Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (5):397-410.
    Recent philosophy of language has been profoundly impacted by the idea that mainstream, model-theoretic semantics is somehow incompatible with deflationary accounts of truth and reference. The present article systematizes the case for incompatibilism, debunks circularity and “modal confusion” arguments familiar in the literature, and reconstructs the popular thought that truth-conditional semantics somehow “presupposes” a correspondence theory of truth as an inference to the best explanation. The case for compatibilism is closed by showing that this IBE argument fails (...)
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  25. Melvin Fitting (1977). Belnap Nuel D. Jr. Restricted Quantification and Conditional Assertion. Truth, Syntax and Modality, Proceedings of the Temple University Conference on Alternative Semantics, Edited by Leblanc Hugues, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, Vol. 68, North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam and London 1973, Pp. 48–75. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 42 (2):314.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  26. Agustin Vicente (2015). The Green Leaves and the Expert: Polysemy and Truth-Conditional Variability. Lingua 157:54-65.
    Polysemy seems to be a relatively neglected phenomenon within philosophy of language as well as in many quarters in linguistic semantics. Not all variations in a word’s contribution to truth-conditional contents are to be thought as expressions of the phenomenon of polysemy, but it can be argued that many are. Polysemous terms are said to contribute senses or aspects to truth-conditional contents. In this paper, I will make use of the notion of aspect to argue that some (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  27.  14
    Eric Swanson (2016). The Application of Constraint Semantics to the Language of Subjective Uncertainty. Journal of Philosophical Logic 45 (2):121-146.
    This paper develops a compositional, type-driven constraint semantic theory for a fragment of the language of subjective uncertainty. In the particular application explored here, the interpretation function of constraint semantics yields not propositions but constraints on credal states as the semantic values of declarative sentences. Constraints are richer than propositions in that constraints can straightforwardly represent assessments of the probability that the world is one way rather than another. The richness of constraints helps us model communicative acts in essentially (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  28.  20
    Stanley Peters (1979). A Truth-Conditional Formulation of Karttunen's Account of Presupposition. Synthese 40 (2):301-316.
    Karttunen's seminal 1973 article Presuppositions of compound sentences, lays the groundwork for the elegant and fruitful theory of this subject which he subsequently presented in (1974). In (1973, pp. 185–8), however, he fallaciously argued that the regularities he discovered concerning the behavior of and, or, and if ... then in English cannot be embodied in any three-valued logic giving a truth-functional interpretation to these connectives. The present paper refutes Karttunen's argument by exhibiting an interpretation with the desired properties, and shows (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   9 citations  
  29.  35
    Frank Döring (1997). The Ramsey Test and Conditional Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (4):359-376.
    Proponents of the projection strategy take an epistemic rule for the evaluation of English conditionals, the Ramsey test, as clue to the truth-conditional semantics of conditionals. They also construe English conditionals as stronger than the material conditional. Given plausible assumptions, however, the Ramsey test induces the semantics of the material conditional. The alleged link between Ramsey test and truth conditions stronger than those of the material conditional can be saved by construing conditionals as ternary, rather than binary, (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  30.  6
    Douglas J. Wulf (2009). Two New Challenges for the Modal Account of the Progressive. Natural Language Semantics 17 (3):205-218.
    The progressive in English appears to be inherently modal, due to what Dowty (Word meaning and Montague grammar: The semantics of verbs and times in generative semantics and in Montague’s PTQ, 1979) terms the imperfective paradox. In truth-conditional accounts, the literal truth of a clause with the modal progressive hinges on the possibility of the described outcome. The clause’s truth under such accounts has also been tacitly assumed to describe its felicitous use. Two challenges for this strategy (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  31.  47
    Peter Milne (2012). Indicative Conditionals, Conditional Probabilities, and the “Defective Truth-Table”: A Request for More Experiments. Thinking and Reasoning 18 (2):196 - 224.
    While there is now considerable experimental evidence that, on the one hand, participants assign to the indicative conditional as probability the conditional probability of consequent given antecedent and, on the other, they assign to the indicative conditional the ?defective truth-table? in which a conditional with false antecedent is deemed neither true nor false, these findings do not in themselves establish which multi-premise inferences involving conditionals participants endorse. A natural extension of the truth-table semantics pronounces as valid numerous inference patterns (...)
    Translate
      Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  32.  47
    Regine Eckardt (2012). Hereby Explained: An Event-Based Account of Performative Utterances. [REVIEW] Linguistics and Philosophy 35 (1):21-55.
    Several authors propose that performative speech acts are self-guaranteeing due to their self-referential nature (Searle 1989; Jary 2007). The present paper offers an analysis of self-referentiality in terms of truth conditional semantics, making use of Davidsonian events. I propose that hereby can denote the ongoing act of information transfer (more mundanely, the utterance) which thereby enters the meaning of the sentence. The analysis will be extended to cover self-referential sentences without the adverb hereby. While self-referentiality can be integrated in (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  33. Kit Fine (2014). Truth-Maker Semantics for Intuitionistic Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (2-3):549-577.
    I propose a new semantics for intuitionistic logic, which is a cross between the construction-oriented semantics of Brouwer-Heyting-Kolmogorov and the condition-oriented semantics of Kripke. The new semantics shows how there might be a common semantical underpinning for intuitionistic and classical logic and how intuitionistic logic might thereby be tied to a realist conception of the relationship between language and the world.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  34.  22
    François Recanati (2010). Truth-Conditional Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
    This book argues against the traditional understanding of the semantics/pragmatics divide and puts forward a radical alternative. Through half a dozen case studies, it shows that what an utterance says cannot be neatly separated from what the speaker means. In particular, the speaker's meaning endows words with senses that are tailored to the situation of utterance and depart from the conventional meanings carried by the words in isolation. This phenomenon of ‘pragmatic modulation’ must be taken into account in theorizing (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   28 citations  
  35. Robert C. Cummins (2002). Truth and Meaning. In Joseph Keim-Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & David Shier (eds.), Meaning and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics. Seven Bridges Press 175-197.
    D O N A L D D AV I D S O N’S “ Meaning and Truth,” re vo l u t i o n i zed our conception of how truth and meaning are related (Davidson    ). In that famous art i c l e , Davidson put forw a rd the bold conjecture that meanings are satisfaction conditions, and that a Tarskian theory of truth for a language is a theory of meaning for that language. (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  36.  65
    Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig (2007). Donald Davidson's Truth-Theoretic Semantics. Clarendon Press.
    The work of Donald Davidson (1917-2003) transformed the study of meaning. Ernie Lepore and Kirk Ludwig, two of the world's leading authorities on Davidson's work, present the definitive study of his widely admired and influential program of truth-theoretic semantics for natural languages, giving an exposition and critical examination of its foundations and applications.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  37.  1
    F. Parlamento (2014). Truth-Value Semantics and Functional Extensions for Classical Logic of Partial Terms Based on Equality. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 55 (3):383-395.
    We develop a bottom-up approach to truth-value semantics for classical logic of partial terms based on equality and apply it to prove the conservativity of the addition of partial description and selection functions, independently of any strictness assumption.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  38. Ernest Lepore & Kirk Ludwig (2009). Donald Davidson's Truth-Theoretic Semantics. Oxford University Press Uk.
    The work of Donald Davidson transformed the study of meaning. Ernie Lepore and Kirk Ludwig, two of the world's leading authorities on Davidson's work, present the definitive study of his widely admired and influential program of truth-theoretic semantics for natural languages, giving an exposition and critical examination of its foundations and applications.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39. Nate Charlow (2014). Logic and Semantics for Imperatives. Journal of Philosophical Logic 43 (4):617-664.
    In this paper I will develop a view about the semantics of imperatives, which I term Modal Noncognitivism, on which imperatives might be said to have truth conditions (dispositionally, anyway), but on which it does not make sense to see them as expressing propositions (hence does not make sense to ascribe to them truth or falsity). This view stands against “Cognitivist” accounts of the semantics of imperatives, on which imperatives are claimed to express propositions, which are then enlisted (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   6 citations  
  40. Robyn Carston (2004). Truth-Conditional Content and Conversational Implicature. In Claudia Bianchi (ed.), The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Csli 65--100.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  41.  12
    Kristen Syrett & Todor Koev (2015). Experimental Evidence for the Truth Conditional Contribution and Shifting Information Status of Appositives. Journal of Semantics 32 (3):525-577.
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  42. Ernie Lepore & Kirk Ludwig (2005). Donald Davidson: Meaning, Truth, Language, and Reality. Oxford University Press Uk.
    Ernest Lepore and Kirk Ludwig present the definitive critical exposition of the philosophical system of Donald Davidson. Davidson's ideas had a deep and broad influence in the central areas of philosophy; he presented them in brilliant essays over four decades, but never set out explicitly the overarching scheme in which they all have their place. Lepore's and Ludwig's book will therefore be the key work, besides Davidson's own, for understanding one of the greatest philosophers of the twentieth century.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  43.  41
    Frederic Goubier & Nausicaa Pouscoulous (2011). Virtus Sermonis and the Semantics-Pragmatics Distinction. Vivarium 49 (1-3):214-239.
    Late medieval theories of language and contemporary philosophy of language have been compared on numerous occasions. Here, we would like to compare two debates: that between the nature of Virtus sermonis , on the medieval side—focusing on a statute published in 1340 by the Faculty of Arts of the University of Paris and its opponents—and, on the contemporary side, the on-going discussion on the semantics-pragmatics distinction and how the truth-value of an utterance should be established. Both the statute and (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44. Steven Gross (2005). The Biconditional Doctrine: Contra Kölbel on a “Dogma” of Davidsonian Semantics. Erkenntnis 62 (2):189-210.
    Should a theory of meaning state what sentences mean, and can a Davidsonian theory of meaning in particular do so? Max Kölbel answers both questions affirmatively. I argue, however, that the phenomena of non-homophony, non-truth-conditional aspects of meaning, semantic mood, and context-sensitivity provide prima facie obstacles for extending Davidsonian truth-theories to yield meaning-stating theorems. Assessing some natural moves in reply requires a more fully developed conception of the task of such theories than Kölbel provides. A more developed conception is (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45.  37
    Daniel Rothschild (2015). Conditionals and Propositions in Semantics. Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):781-791.
    IntroductionThe project of giving an account of meaning in natural languages goes largely by assigning truth-conditional content to sentences. I will call the view that sentences have truth-conditional content propositionalism as it is common to identify the truth-conditional content of a sentence with the proposition it expresses. This content plays an important role in our explanations of the speech-acts, attitude ascriptions, and the meaning of sentences when they appear as parts of longer sentences. Much work in philosophy (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  46.  40
    Stefano Predelli (2011). Sub-Sentential Speech and the Traditional View. Linguistics and Philosophy 34 (6):571-588.
    This essay argues that cases of apparently sub-sentential speech, such as Charles’ utterance of ‘a world famous topologist’ in the presence of a suitably salient woman, are unproblematic from the viewpoint of the Traditional View of meaning and truth-conditions. My argument is grounded on the distinction between different senses of ‘truth-conditions’ in double-index semantics, and on an understanding of semantic inputs as constraints on logical forms. Given these conceptual resources, I argue that an utterly traditional understanding of the relationships (...)
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47.  42
    Geoff Georgi (2015). A Propositional Semantics for Substitutional Quantification. Philosophical Studies 172 (5):1183-1200.
    The standard truth-conditional semantics for substitutional quantification, due to Saul Kripke, does not specify what proposition is expressed by sentences containing the particular substitutional quantifier. In this paper, I propose an alternative semantics for substitutional quantification that does. The key to this semantics is identifying an appropriate propositional function to serve as the content of a bound occurrence of a formula containing a free substitutional variable. I apply this semantics to traditional philosophical reasons for interest (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48.  14
    Stephen Barker (forthcoming). Figurative Speech: Pointing a Poisoned Arrow at the Heart of Semantics. Philosophical Studies:1-18.
    I argue that figurative speech, and irony in particular, presents a deep challenge to the orthodox view about sentence content. The standard view is that sentence contents are, at their core, propositional contents: truth-conditional contents. Moreover, the only component of a sentence’s content that embeds in compound sentences, like belief reports or conditionals, is the propositional content. I argue that a careful analysis of irony shows this view cannot be maintained. Irony is a purely pragmatic form of content that (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49.  2
    Dale Jacquette (forthcoming). Semantics and Pragmatics of Referentially Transparent and Referentially Opaque Belief Ascription Sentences. Philosophia:1-23.
    This essay takes a critical look at Jonathan Berg’s theory of direct belief. Berg’s analysis of the concept of direct belief is considered insightful, but doubts are raised concerning his generalization of the purely extensional truth conditional semantics of direct belief ascription sentences to the truth conditional semantics of all belief ascription sentences. Difficulties are posed that Berg does not discuss, but that are implied by the proposal that the truth conditional semantics of belief ascription sentences generally (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. Scott Soames (2008). Why Propositions Cannot Be Sets of Truth-Supporting Circumstances. Journal of Philosophical Logic 37 (3):267 - 276.
    No semantic theory satisfying certain natural constraints can identify the semantic contents of sentences (the propositions they express), with sets of circumstances in which the sentences are true–no matter how fine-grained the circumstances are taken to be. An objection to the proof is shown to fail by virtue of conflating model-theoretic consequence between sentences with truth-conditional consequence between the semantic contents of sentences. The error underlines the impotence of distinguishing semantics, in the sense of a truth-based theory of (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
1 — 50 / 1000