Search results for 'truthlikeness' (try it on Scholar)

102 found
Order:
  1.  24
    Simon D'Alfonso (forthcoming). Belief Merging with the Aim of Truthlikeness. Synthese:1-22.
    The merging/fusion of belief/data collections in propositional logic form is a topic that has received due attention within the domains of database and AI research. A distinction can be made between two types of scenarios to which the process of merging can be applied. In the first type, the collections represent preferences, such as the voting choices of a group of people, that need to be aggregated so as to give a consistent result that in some way best represents the (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  2.  5
    Ingvar Johansson (forthcoming). In Defense of the Notion of Truthlikeness. Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie:1-11.
    The notion of truthlikeness, coined by Karl Popper, has very much fallen into oblivion, but the paper defends it. It can be regarded in two different ways. Either as a notion that is meaningful only if some formal measure of degree of truthlikeness can be constructed; or as a merely non-formal comparative notion that nonetheless has important functions to fulfill. It is the latter notion that is defended; it is claimed that such a notion is needed for both (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  3.  4
    Gustavo Cevolani (2016). Carnapian Truthlikeness. Logic Journal of the IGPL 24 (4):542-556.
    Theories of truthlikeness (or verisimilitude) are currently being classified according to two independent distinctions: that between ‘content’ and ‘likeness’ accounts, and that between ‘conjunctive’ and ‘disjunctive’ ones. In this article, I present and discuss a new definition of truthlikeness, which employs Carnap’s notion of the content elements entailed by a theory or proposition, and is then labelled ‘Carnapian’. After studying in detail the properties and shortcomings of this definition, I argue that it occupies a unique position in the (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  4.  11
    Ilkka Niiniluoto (2014). Representation and Truthlikeness. Foundations of Science 19 (4):375-379.
    Woosuk Park’s paper “Misrepresentation in Context” is a useful plea for a theory of representation with promising interaction between cognitive science, philosophy of science, and aesthetics. In this paper, I argue that such a unified account is provided by Charles S. Peirce’s semiotics. This theory puts Park’s criticism of Nelson Goodman and Jerry Fodor in context. Some of Park’s pertinent remarks on the problem of misrepresentation can be illuminated by the account of truthlikeness and idealization developed by philosophers of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  5. Simon D'Alfonso (2011). Supplementing Belief Revision for The Aim of Truthlikeness. The Reasoner 5 (9):143-144.
  6.  90
    Graham Oddie (2014). Truthlikeness. Stanford Encyclopedia.
    Truth is the aim of inquiry. Nevertheless, some falsehoods seem to realize this aim better than others. Some truths better realize the aim than other truths. And perhaps even some falsehoods realize the aim better than some truths do. The dichotomy of the class of propositions into truths and falsehoods should thus be supplemented with a more fine-grained ordering — one which classifies propositions according to their closeness to the truth, their degree of truthlikeness or verisimilitude. The logical problem (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   22 citations  
  7.  14
    Gustavo Cevolani & Gerhard Schurz (forthcoming). Probability, Approximate Truth, and Truthlikeness: More Ways Out of the Preface Paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy:1-17.
    The so-called Preface Paradox seems to show that one can rationally believe two logically incompatible propositions. We address this puzzle, relying on the notions of truthlikeness and approximate truth as studied within the post-Popperian research programme on verisimilitude. In particular, we show that adequately combining probability, approximate truth, and truthlikeness leads to an explanation of how rational belief is possible in the face of the Preface Paradox. We argue that our account is superior to other solutions of the (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  8. Ilkka Niiniluoto (1997). Reference Invariance and Truthlikeness. Philosophy of Science 64 (4):546-554.
    A holistic account of the meaning of theoretical terms leads scientific realism into serious troubles. Alternative methods of reference fixing are needed by a realist who wishes to show how reference invariance is possible in spite of meaning variance. This paper argues that the similarity theory of truthlikeness and approximate truth, developed by logicians since the mid 1970s, helps to make precise the idea of charitable theoretical reference. Comparisons to the recent proposals by Kitcher and Psillos are given. This (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  9.  29
    Carlotta Piscopo & Mauro Birattari (2010). A Critique of the Constitutive Role of Truthlikeness in the Similarity Approach. Erkenntnis 72 (3):379 - 386.
    The similarity approach stands as a significant attempt to defend scientific realism from the attack of the pessimistic meta-induction. The strategy behind the similarity approach is to shift from an absolute notion of truth to the more flexible one of truthlikeness. Nonetheless, some authors are not satisfied with this attempt to defend realism and find that the notion of truthlikeness is not fully convincing. The aim of this paper is to analyze and understand the reasons of this dissatisfaction. (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  10. Graham Oddie (1986). The Poverty of the Popperian Program for Truthlikeness. Philosophy of Science 53 (2):163-178.
    The importance for realism of the concept of truthlikeness was first stressed by Popper. Popper himself not only mapped out a program for defining truthlikeness (in terms of falsity content and truth content) but produced the first definitions within this program. These were shown to be inadequate. But the program lingered on, and the most recent attempt to revive it is that of Newton-Smith. His attempt is a failure, not because of some minor defect or technical flaw in (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  11.  7
    Simon D’Alfonso (2016). Belief Merging with the Aim of Truthlikeness. Synthese 193 (7):2013-2034.
    The merging/fusion of belief/data collections in propositional logic form is a topic that has received due attention within the domains of database and AI research. A distinction can be made between two types of scenarios to which the process of merging can be applied. In the first type, the collections represent preferences, such as the voting choices of a group of people, that need to be aggregated so as to give a consistent result that in some way best represents the (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  12.  83
    Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla (2000). Truthlikeness, Rationality and Scientific Method. Synthese 122 (3):321-335.
    I. A. Kieseppä''s criticism of the methodological use of the theory of verisimilitude, and D. B. Resnik''s arguments against the explanation of scientific method by appeal to scientific aims are critically considered. Since the notion of verisimilitude was introduced as an attempt to show that science can be seen as a rational enterprise in the pursuit of truth, defenders of the verisimilitude programme need to show that scientific norms can be interpreted (at least in principle) as rules that try to (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  13. Ilkka Niiniluoto (2005). Abduction and Truthlikeness. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):255-275.
    This paper studies the interplay between two notions which are important for the project of defending scientific realism: abduction and truthlikeness. The main focus is the generalization of abduction to cases where the conclusion states that the best theory is truthlike or approximately true. After reconstructing the recent proposals of Theo Kuipers within the framework of monadic predicate logic, I apply my own notion of truthlikeness. It turns out that a theory with higher truthlikeness does not always (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  14.  75
    Eric Barnes (1995). Truthlikeness, Translation, and Approximate Causal Explanation. Philosophy of Science 62 (2):215-226.
    D. Miller's demonstrations of the language dependence of truthlikeness raise a profound problem for the claim that scientific progress is objective. In two recent papers (Barnes 1990, 1991) I argue that the objectivity of progress may be grounded on the claim that the aim of science is not merely truth but knowledge; progress thus construed is objective in an epistemic sense. In this paper I construct a new solution to Miller's problem grounded on the notion of "approximate causal explanation" (...)
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  15.  35
    Gustavo Cevolani & Luca Tambolo (2013). Truth May Not Explain Predictive Success, but Truthlikeness Does. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 44 (4):590-593.
    In a recent paper entitled “Truth does not explain predictive success” , Carsten Held argues that the so-called “No-Miracles Argument” for scientific realism is easily refuted when the consequences of the underdetermination of theories by the evidence are taken into account. We contend that the No-Miracles Argument, when it is deployed within the context of sophisticated versions of realism, based on the notion of truthlikeness , survives Held’s criticism unscathed.
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  16.  40
    Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla (2000). Truthlikeness, Rationality and Scientific Method. Synthese 122 (3):321 - 335.
    I. A. Kieseppä's criticism of the methodological use of the theory of verisimilitude, and D. B. Resnik's arguments against the explanation of scientific method by appeal to scientific aims are critically considered. Since the notion of verisimilitude was introduced as an attempt to show that science can be seen as a rational enterprise in the pursuit of truth, defenders of the verisimilitude programme need to show that scientific norms can be interpreted (at least in principle) as rules that try to (...)
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  17.  79
    Gerhard Schurz (2005). Bayesian H-D Confirmation and Structuralistic Truthlikeness: Discussion and Comparison with the Relevant-Element and the Content-Part Approach. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):141-159.
    In this paper it is shown that, in spite of their intuitive starting points, Kuipers' accounts lead to counterintuitive consequences. The counterintuitive results of Kuipers' account of H-D confirmation stem from the fact that Kuipers explicates a concept of partial (as opposed to full) confirmation. It is shown that Schurz-Weingartner's relevant-element approach as well as Gemes' content-part approach provide an account of full confirmation that does not lead to these counterintuitive results. One of the unwelcome results of Kuipers' account of (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  18.  52
    I. A. Kieseppä (1996). Truthlikeness for Hypotheses Expressed in Terms of N Quantitative Variables. Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (2):109 - 134.
    A qualitative theory of truthlikeness, based on a family of quantitative measures, is developed for hypotheses that are concerned with the values of a finite number of real-valued quantities. Representing hypotheses by subsets of $R^{n}$ , I first show that a straightforward application of the basic ideas of the similarity approach to truthlikeness does not work out for hypotheses with zero n-dimensional Lebesgue measure. However, it is easy to give a counterpart for the average measure preferred by Pavel (...)
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  19.  19
    Ilkka Niiniluoto (1982). Truthlikeness for Quantitative Statements. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1982:208 - 216.
    The most elaborate recent accounts of truthlikeness (verisimilitude) apply this notion primarily to generalizations in first-order languages with qualitative predicates. This paper outlines a new approach to the definition of truthlikeness for quantitative statements, including singular statements (point estimation), interval statements (interval estimation), and quantitative laws. In the case of laws, the basic issue is reduced to the topological problem of measuring the distance between two real-valued functions. The solution of this problem makes it possible to define also (...)
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  20. Eric Christian Barnes (1990). Beyond Truthlikeness: Toward a Linguistically Invariant Theory of Scientific Progress. Dissertation, Indiana University
    In the 1970's a problem arose for the viability of Popper's truthlikeness project. The problem, in short, was that all plausible measures of the truthlikeness of scientific theories were language dependent. This dissertation is primarily concerned to provide a substitute notion that can do the work 'verisimilitude' was intended to do without suffering from linguistic relativity. It is argued that the notion of 'knowledge', or 'knowledgelikeness', can suffice in this regard. ;Chapter One seeks to convince the reader that (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  21.  8
    Ilkka Niiniluoto (1989). Truthlikeness. Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):297-300.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   69 citations  
  22.  16
    Theo A. F. Kuipers (ed.) (1987). What is Closer-to-the-Truth?: A Parade of Approaches to Truthlikeness. Rodopi.
    INTRODUCTION When Karl Popper published in' his definition of closer-to-the- truth this was an important intellectual event, but not a shocking one. ...
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   10 citations  
  23. Thomas Mormann (2006). Truthlikeness for Theories on Countable Languages. In Ian Jarvie, Karl Milford & David Miller (eds.), Karl Popper: A Centenary Assessment vol. 3.
  24.  24
    Ilkka Niiniluoto (2010). Theory Change, Truthlikeness, and Belief Revision. In M. Dorato M. Suàrez (ed.), Epsa Epistemology and Methodology of Science. Springer 189--199.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   2 citations  
  25.  61
    Ilkka Niiniluoto (1978). Truthlikeness: Comments on Recent Discussion. Synthese 38 (2):281 - 329.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   11 citations  
  26.  24
    Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (1992). Truthlikeness Without Truth: A Methodological Approach. Synthese 93 (3):343-372.
    In this paper, an attempt is made to solve various problems posed to current theories of verisimilitude: the problem of linguistic variance; the problem of which are the best scientific methods for getting the most verisimilar theories; and the question of the ontological commitment in scientific theories. As a result of my solution to these problems, and with the help of other considerations of epistemological character, I conclude that the notion of 'Tarskian truth' is dispensable in a rational interpretation of (...)
    No categories
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  27. I. A. Kieseppä (1996). Truthlikeness for Multidimensional, Quantitative Cognitive Problems.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  28. Ilkka Niiniluoto (1979). Degrees of Truthlikeness: From Singular Sentences to Generalisations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (4):371-376.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  29.  73
    David Pearce (1983). Truthlikeness and Translation: A Comment on Oddie. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34 (4):380-385.
    Direct download (8 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  30.  40
    Ilkka Niiniluoto (2002). 10 Truthlikeness and Economic Theories. In Uskali Mäki (ed.), Fact and Fiction in Economics: Models, Realism and Social Construction. Cambridge University Press 214.
  31.  34
    Ilkka Niiniluoto (2007). Idealization, Counterfactuals, and Truthlikeness. In Jerzy Brzeziński, Andrzej Klawiter, Theo A. F. Kuipers, Krzysztof Łastowski, Katarzyna Paprzycka & Piotr Przybysz (eds.), The Courage of Doing Philosophy: Essays Dedicated to Leszek Nowak. Rodopi 103--122.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  32. I. Niiniluoto (1998). Truthlikeness: The Third Phase'. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49:1-31.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  33.  51
    David Miller (1972). The Truth-Likeness of Truthlikeness. Analysis 33 (2):50 - 55.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   5 citations  
  34. Ilkka Niiniluoto (1994). Truthlikeness Misapplied: A Reply to Ernest W. Adams. Synthese 101 (2):291 - 300.
    Direct download (6 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  35.  49
    R. D. Rosenkrantz (1980). Measuring Truthlikeness. Synthese 45 (3):463 - 487.
    Direct download (4 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   4 citations  
  36.  62
    Ilkka Niiniluoto (1986). Truthlikeness and Bayesian Estimation. Synthese 67 (2):321 - 346.
  37.  16
    Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (1992). Truthlikeness Without Truth: A Methodological Approach. Synthese 93 (3):343 - 372.
    In this paper, an attempt is made to solve various problems posed to current theories of verisimilitude: (1) the (Miller's) problem of linguistic variance; (2) the problem of which are the best scientific methods for getting the most verisimilar theories; and (3) the question of the ontological commitment in scientific theories. As a result of my solution ot these problems, and with the help of other considerations of epistemological character, I conclude that the notion of Tarskian truth is dispensable in (...)
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   3 citations  
  38.  76
    Jesús P. Zamora Bonilla (2005). Truthlikeness with a Human Face: On Some Connections Between the Theory of Verisimilitude and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):361-369.
    Verisimilitude theorists (and many scientific realists) assume that science attempts to provide hypotheses with an increasing degree of closeness to the full truth; on the other hand, radical sociologists of science assert that flesh and bone scientists struggle to attain much more mundane goals (such as income, power, fame, and so on). This paper argues that both points of view can be made compatible, for (1) rational individuals only would be interested in engaging in a strong competition (such as that (...)
    Direct download (3 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  39.  65
    Theo A. F. Kuipers (1997). Comparative Versus Quantitative Truthlikeness Definitions: Reply to Thomas Mormann. [REVIEW] Erkenntnis 47 (2):187-192.
    Direct download (7 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  40.  56
    Roger D. Rosenkrantz (1975). Truthlikeness: Comment on David Miller. Synthese 30 (1-2):193 - 197.
    Direct download (5 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  41. David Pearce (1989). Review: Ilkka Niiniluoto, Truthlikeness. [REVIEW] Journal of Symbolic Logic 54 (1):297-300.
    Translate
      Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography   1 citation  
  42.  15
    Theo A. F. Kuipers (2005). Confirmation and Truthlikeness: Reply to Gerhard Schurz. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):160-166.
  43.  2
    Ilkka Niiniluoto (1997). Theoretical Reference and Truthlikeness. In Julian Nida-Rümelin & Georg Meggle (eds.), Analyomen 2, Volume I: Logic, Epistemology, Philosophy of Science. De Gruyter 439-452.
    Direct download  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  44.  1
    Carlotta Piscopo & Mauro Birattari (2010). A Critique of the Constitutive Role of Truthlikeness in the Similarity Approach. Erkenntnis 72 (3):379-386.
    No categories
    Direct download (2 more)  
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  45. Graham Oddie (1987). Truthlikeness and the Convexity of Propositions. In Kuipers T. (ed.), What is Closer-to-the-Truth. Rodopi 197-217.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  46. Graham Oddie (2008). Truthlikeness and Value. In Pihlstrom S. (ed.), Approaching Truth: Essays in Honour of Ilkka Niiniluoto. College Publications 225-40.
    Translate
     
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  47. Jesús Zamora Bonilla (2005). Truthlikeness with a Human Face: On Some Connections Between the Theory of Verisimilitude and the Sociology of Scientific Knowledge. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83:361-369.
    Verisimilitude theorists assume that science attempts to provide hypotheses with an increasing degree of closeness to the full truth; on the other hand, radical sociologists of science assert that flesh and bone scientists struggle to attain much more mundane goals . This paper argues that both points of view can be made compatible, for rational individuals only would be interested in engaging in a strong competition if they knew in advance the rules under which their outcomes are to be assessed, (...)
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  48. Graham Oddie (forthcoming). Truth and Truthlikeness. In Glanzberg M. (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Truth. Oxford University Press
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  49. Graham Oddie (1987). The Picture Theory of Truthlikeness. In Kuipers T. (ed.), What is Closer-to-the-Truth. Rodopi 25-46.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
  50. G. L. Pandit (1988). Science and Truthlikeness. Journal of the Indian Council of Philosophical Research 5.
     
    Export citation  
     
    My bibliography  
1 — 50 / 102