Linked bibliography for the SEP article "John Austin" by Brian Bix |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
Primary Sources
- Austin, John, 1832, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, W. Rumble (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995. (Scholar)
- –––, 1879, Lectures on Jurisprudence, or The Philosophy of Positive Law, two vols., R. Campbell (ed.), 4th edition, rev., London: John Murray; reprint, Bristol: Thoemmes Press, 2002. (Scholar)
Secondary Sources
- Bentham, Jeremy, 1789, An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, J. H. Burns & H.L.A. Hart (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996. (Scholar)
- –––, 1970, Of Laws in General, H.L.A. Hart (ed.), London: Athlone Press. (Scholar)
- Bix, Brian H., 2000, “On the Dividing Line Between Natural Law Theory and Legal Positivism,”Notre Dame Law Review, 75: 1613–1624. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004, “Legal Positivism,” in The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory, Martin P. Golding & William A. Edmundson (eds.), Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 29–49. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009, Jurisprudence: Theory and Context, 5th ed., London: Sweet & Maxwell. (Scholar)
- Clark, E. C., 1883, Practical Jurisprudence: A Comment on Austin, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Cliffe Leslie, T. E., 1864, “Modern Phases of Jurisprudence in England,” Westminster Review, 26: 261–76 [U.S. edition, 162: 125–132]. (Scholar)
- Cosgrove, Richard A., 1996, Scholars of the Law: English Jurisprudence from Blackstone to Hart, Chapter 4, New York: New York University Press. (Scholar)
- Cotterrell, Roger, 2003, The Politics of Jurisprudence: A Critical Introduction to Legal Philosophy, 2nd edition, London: LexisNexis. (Scholar)
- Dewey, James, 1894, “Austin's Theory of Sovereignty,” Political Science Quarterly, 9: 31–52. (Scholar)
- Duxbury, Neil, 2005, “English Jurisprudence Between Austin and Hart,” Virginia Law Review, 91: 1–91. (Scholar)
- Dworkin, Ronald, 1986, Law's Empire, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Finnis, John, 2000a, “On the Incoherence of Legal Positivism,” Notre Dame Law Review, 75: 1597–1611. (Scholar)
- –––, 2000b, “The Truth in Legal Positivism,” in The Autonomy of Law, Robert P. George (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 195–214. (Scholar)
- Hamburger, Lotte & Joseph, 1985, Troubled Lives: John and Sarah Austin, Toronto: University of Toronto Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992, Contemplating Adultery: The Secret Life of a Victorian Woman, London: Macmillan. (Scholar)
- Harris, J.W., 1977, “The Concept of Sovereign Will,” Acta Juridica (Essays in Honour of Ben Beinart, Volume II), Cape Town: Juta & Co., 1979, pp. 1–15. (Scholar)
- Hart, H.L.A., 1954, “Introduction” to John Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, H.L.A. Hart (ed.), London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, pp. vii-xxi. (Scholar)
- –––, 1958, “Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals,”Harvard Law Review, 71: 593–629. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994, The Concept of Law, 2nd edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Hobbes, Thomas, 1651, Leviathan, Richard Tuck (ed.), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. (Scholar)
- Hume, David, 1739, A Treatise of Human Nature, David Fate Norton & Mary J. Norton (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. (Scholar)
- Leiter, Brian, 2007a, “Naturalism in Legal Philosophy,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2007 Edition), URL = <http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2007/entries/lawphil-naturalism/> (Scholar)
- –––, 2007b, Naturalizing Jurisprudence, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Lobban, Michael, 1991, The Common Law and English Jurisprudence 1760–1850, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Mill, John Stuart, 1863, “Austin on Jurisprudence,” Edinburgh Review, 118 (October): 439–82 [U.S. edition, 118: 222–244]. (Scholar)
- Moles, Robert N., 1987, Definition and Rule in Legal Theory: A Reassessment of H.L.A. Hart and the Positivist Tradition, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Morison, W. L., 1982, John Austin, Stanford: Stanford University Press. (Scholar)
- Rumble, W. E., 1985, The Thought of John Austin: Jurisprudence, Colonial Reform, and the British Constitution, London: Athlone Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995, “Introduction,” in J. Austin, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined, pp. vii-xxiv. (Scholar)
- Savigny, Friedrich Karl von, 1975, On the Vocation of Our Age for Legislation and Jurisprudence, Abraham Hayward (trans.), New York: Arno Press. (Scholar)
- Schwarz, Andreas B., 1934, “John Austin and the German Jurisprudence of His Time,” Politica, 1: 178–199. (Scholar)
- Sebok, Anthony J., 1998, Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Stein, Peter, 1988, The Character and Influence of the Roman Civil Law: Historical Essays, London: The Hambledon Press. (Scholar)
- Tapper, Colin, 1965, “Austin on Sanctions,” Cambridge Law Journal, 23(2): 271–287. (Scholar)
Generated Sat May 11 03:08:58 2013
