Online research in philosophy

• Home
• New items
  • All new items
  • Books
  • Journal articles
  • Manuscripts
• Browse by area
  • All Categories
  • Metaphysics and Epistemology
    • Epistemology
    • Metaphilosophy
    • Metaphysics
    • Philosophy of Action
    • Philosophy of Language
    • Philosophy of Mind
    • Philosophy of Religion
    • M&E, Misc
  • Value Theory
    • Aesthetics
    • Applied Ethics
    • Meta-Ethics
    • Normative Ethics
    • Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality
    • Philosophy of Law
    • Social and Political Philosophy
    • Value Theory, Miscellaneous
  • Science, Logic, and Mathematics
    • Logic and Philosophy of Logic
    • Philosophy of Biology
    • Philosophy of Cognitive Science
    • Philosophy of Computing and Information
    • Philosophy of Mathematics
    • Philosophy of Physical Science
    • Philosophy of Social Science
    • Philosophy of Probability
    • General Philosophy of Science
    • Philosophy of Science, Misc
  • History of Western Philosophy
    • Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
    • Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
    • 17th/18th Century Philosophy
    • 19th Century Philosophy
    • 20th Century Philosophy
    • History of Western Philosophy, Misc
  • Philosophical Traditions
    • African/Africana Philosophy
    • Asian Philosophy
    • Continental Philosophy
    • European Philosophy
    • Philosophy of the Americas
    • Philosophical Traditions, Miscellaneous
  • Philosophy, Misc
    • Philosophy, Introductions and Anthologies
    • Philosophy, General Works
    • Philosophy, Miscellaneous
  • Other Academic Areas
    • Natural Sciences
    • Social Sciences
    • Cognitive Sciences
    • Formal Sciences
    • Arts and Humanities
    • Professional Areas
    • Other Academic Areas, Misc
• Browse journals
• Discussions
  • All
  • Philosophy
  • In my forums
  • In the profession
  • About PhilPapers
  • Paper discussions
• Sign in
  • Sign in
  • Register
  • I've forgotten my password
• Submit material
  • Submit a book or article
  • Upload a bibliography
  • Personal pages we track
  • Archives we track
  • Information for publishers
• Help & more
  • Introduction
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Editor's Guide
  • The Categorization Project
  • For Publishers
  • For Archive Admins
  • Contact us
  • PhilPapers Surveys
  • API
  • Bargain Finder
  • About PhilPapers

• Bach, K., 1994, ‘Semantic slack: what is said and more,’ in S. Tsohatzidis (ed.), Foundations of Speech-Act Theory, London: Routledge, pp. 267–291. (Scholar)
• Barker, S., 1997, ‘Material implication and general indicative conditionals,’ The Philosophical Quarterly, 47: 195–211. (Scholar)
• Berg, J., 2002, ‘Is semantics still possible?’ Journal of Pragmatics, 34: 349–359. (Scholar)
• Båve, A., 2008, ‘A pragmatic defense of Millianism’Philosophical Studies, 138: 271–289. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, Insensitive Semantics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Carnap, R., 1947, Meaning and Necessity, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Cohen, L.J., 1986, ‘How is conceptual innovation possible?’Erkenntnis, 25: 221–238. (Scholar)
• Chierchia, G., 1995, The Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition, and the Theory of Grammar, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Scholar)
• Cresswell, M., 1986, Structured Meanings, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Davidson, D., 1965, ‘Theories of meaning and learnable languages,’ Reprinted in D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001: 3–16. (Scholar)
• –––, 1970, ‘Semantics for natural languages,’ Reprinted in D. Davidson, Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001: 55–64. (Scholar)
• Davies, M., 1981, Meaning, Quantification, Necessity, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Davis, W., 2003, Meaning, Expression, and Thought, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Dever, J., 1999, ‘Compositionality as methodology,’ Linguistics and Philosophy, 22: 311–326. (Scholar)
• Dummett, M., 1973, Frege: Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Evans, G., 1982, The Varieties of Reference, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
• Fine, K., 2007, Semantic Relationism, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• von Fintel, K., 1998, ‘Quantifiers and if-clauses,’ The Philosophical Quarterly, 48: 209–214. (Scholar)
• Fischer, E., 2000, Linguistic Creativity: Exercises in ‘Philosophical Therapy’, Dordrecht: Kluwer. (Scholar)
• Fodor, J., 1991, ‘Why meaning (probably) isn't conceptual role,’ Mind and Language, 6: 329–343. (Scholar)
• –––, 1996, ‘The pet fish and the red herring: why concepts aren't prototypes,’ Cognition, 58: 243–276. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998a, ‘There are no recognitional concepts — not even RED,’ in In Critical Condition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 35–47. (Scholar)
• –––, 1998b, ‘There are no recognitional concepts — not even RED, Part 2: The plot thickens,’ In In Critical Condition, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 49–62. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001a, ‘Language, thought and compositionality,’ Mind and Language, 16: 1–15. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001b, ‘Why compositionality won't go away: Reflections on Horwich's “Deflationary” Theory,’ Ratio, 14: 350–368. (Scholar)
• Fodor, J. and E. Lepore, 1992, Holism: A Shopper's Guide, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• –––, 2002, The Compositionality Papers, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Fodor, J., and Pylyshyn, Z., 1988, ‘Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critique,’ Cognition, 28: 3–71. (Scholar)
• Frege, G., 1884, The Foundations of Arithmetic, Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press, 1980. (Scholar)
• –––, 1891, ‘On the law of inertia,’ reprinted in B. McGuiness (ed.), Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, 1984: 123–138. (Scholar)
• –––, 1892, ‘On concept and object,’ reprinted in B. McGuiness (ed.), Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, 1984: 182–194. (Scholar)
• –––, 1906a, ‘Foundations of geometry/II,’ reprinted in B. McGuiness (ed.), Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, 1984: 293–340. (Scholar)
• –––, 1906b, ‘Introduction to logic,’ in Hermes et al. (eds.), Posthumous Writings, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1979: 185–196. (Scholar)
• –––, 1914, ‘Logic in mathematics,’ in Hermes et al. (eds.), Posthumous Writings, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1979: 201–250. (Scholar)
• –––, 1914?, ‘Letter to Jourdain,’ in G. Gabriel et al. (eds.), Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1980: 78–80. (Scholar)
• –––, 1923, ‘Compound thoughts,’ reprinted in B. McGuiness (ed.), Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, Oxford: Blackwell, 1984: 390–406. (Scholar)
• Gazdar, G., Klein E., Pullum G., and Sag I., 1985, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Geach, P., 1965, ‘Logical procedures and the identity of expressions,’ Reprinted in Logic Matters, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1980, pp. 108–115. (Scholar)
• Grandy, R., 1990, ‘Understanding and compositionality,’ in J. A. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 4: Action Theory and Philosophy of Mind, Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Publishing Co.: 557 – 572. (Scholar)
• Groenendijk J. and M. Stokhof, 1990, ‘Dynamic Montague Grammar,’ in L. Kálmán et al. Proceedings of the 2^nd Symposium on Logic and Language, Budapest: Akadémiai Kiadó, 3–48. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic,’ Linguistics and Philosophy, 14: 39–100. (Scholar)
• Heim , I., 1982, The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Garland Publishing Inc., 1988. (Scholar)
• Hendrix, H., 2001, ‘Compositionality and model-theoretic interpretation,’ Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 10: 29–48. (Scholar)
• Higginbotham, J., 1985, ‘On semantics,’ Linguistic Inquiry, 16: 547–593. (Scholar)
• –––, 1986, ‘Linguistic theory and Davidson's program in semantics,’ in E. Lepore (ed.), Truth and Interpretation: Perspectives on the Philosophy of Donald Davidson, Oxford: Blackwell: 29–48. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, ‘Conditionals and compositionality,’ in J. Hawthorne (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 17: 181–194. (Scholar)
• –––, 2007, ‘Some consequences of compositionality,’ in G. Ramchand and C. Reiss (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces , Oxford: Oxford University Press: 425–444. (Scholar)
• Hintikka, J., 1981, ‘Theories of truth and learnable languages,’ in S. Kanger and S. Öhman (eds.), Philosophy and Grammar, Dordrecht: Reidel: 37–58. (Scholar)
• Hintikka, J. and G. Sandu, 1997, ‘Game-theoretical semantics,’ in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam: Elsevier. 361–410. (Scholar)
• Hodges, W., 1998, ‘Compositionality is not the problem,’ Logic and Logical Philosophy, 6: 7–33. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, ‘Formal features of compositionality,’ Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 10: 7–28. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012,‘Formalizing between meaning and syntax,’ in M. Werning, W. Hinzen, and E. Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 245–261. (Scholar)
• Horwich, P., 1997, ‘The composition of meanings,’ Philosophical Review, 106: 503–533. (Scholar)
• Husserl, E., 1913, Logische Untersuchungen II/1, Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. (Scholar)
• Janssen, T. M. V., 1983, Foundations and Applications of Montague Grammar, Amsterdam: Mathematisch Centrum. (Scholar)
• –––, 1997, ‘Compositionality,’ in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, Amsterdam: Elsevier. 417–473. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, ‘Frege, contextuality and compositionality,’ Journal of Logic, Language, and Information, 10: 115–136. (Scholar)
• Jacobson, P., 2002, ‘The (dis)organization of grammar: 25 years,’ Linguistics & Philosophy, 25: 601–626. (Scholar)
• Jacobson, P., 2012, ‘Direct compositionality,’ in M. Werning, W. Hinzen, and E. Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 109–128. (Scholar)
• Johnson, K., 2004, ‘On the systematicity of language and thought,’ Journal of Philosophy, 101: 111–139. (Scholar)
• Johnson, K., 2006, ‘On the nature of reverse compositionality,’ Erkenntnis, 64: 37–60. (Scholar)
• Kamp, H., 1981, ‘A theory of truth and semantic representation,’ in J. Groenendijk and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Natural Language, Amsterdam: Amsterdam Centre: 277–322.
• Kamp, H. and B. Partee, 1995, ‘Prototype theory and compositionality,’ Cognition, 57: 129–191. (Scholar)
• Kaplan, D., 1977, ‘Demonstratives. An Essay on the Logic, Metaphysics, and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals,’ reprinted in J. Almog, J. Perry and H. K. Wettstein (eds.), Themes from Kaplan, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989, pp. 481–565. (Scholar)
• Kazmi, A. and F. J. Pelletier, 1998, ‘Is compositionality formally vacuous?’ Linguistics and Philosophy, 21: 629–633. (Scholar)
• Kratzer, A., 1986, ‘Conditionals,’ Chicago Linguistic Society, 22: 1–15. (Scholar)
• Lahav, R., 1989, ‘Against compositionality: the case of adjectives,’ Philosophical Studies, 57: 261–279. (Scholar)
• Larson, R. and G. Segal, 1995, Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Leitgeb, H., 2005, ‘Hodges' theorem does not account for determinacy of translation: A reply to Werning,’ Erkenntnis, 62: 411–425. (Scholar)
• Lewis, D., 1970, ‘General semantics,’ Reprinted in Philosophical Papers. Vol. 1, Oxford: Oxford University Press: 189–229. (Scholar)
• –––, 1975, ‘Adverbs of quantification,’ Reprinted in Papers in Philosophical Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 5–20. (Scholar)
• –––, 1980, ‘Index, context, and content,’ Reprinted in Papers in Philosophical Logic, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 21–44. (Scholar)
• Martin R. L., 1994, The Meaning of Language, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Montague, R., 1970, ‘Universal Grammar,’ Reprinted in R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy, New Haven : Yale University Press, 1974: 222–246. (Scholar)
• Nunberg G., I. A. Sag and T. Wasow, 1994, ‘Idioms,’ Language, 70: 491–538. (Scholar)
• Pagin, P., 2003, ‘Communication and strong compositionality,’ Journal of Philosophical Logic, 32: 287–322. (Scholar)
• –––, 2005, ‘Compositionality and context,’ in G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 303–348. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, ‘Communication and the complexity of semantics,’ in M. Werning, W. Hinzen, and E. Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 510–529. (Scholar)
• Pagin, P. and F. J. Pelletier., 2007, ‘Context, content, and composition,’ in G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Contex-Sensitivity and Semantic Minimalism, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 25–62. (Scholar)
• Pagin, P. and D. Westerståhl, 2010a, ‘Compositionality I: Definitions and Variants,’ Philosophy Compass, 5: 250–264. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010b, ‘Compositionality II: Arguments and Problems,’ Philosophy Compass, 5: 265–282. (Scholar)
• Partee, B., 1984, ‘Compositionality,’ in F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Dordrecht: Foris: 281–312. (Scholar)
• –––, 1995, ‘Lexical semantics and compositionality,’ D. Osherson (ed.), An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Vol. 1, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press: 311–360. (Scholar)
• Patterson, D., 2005, ‘Learnability and compositionality,’ Mind and Language, 20: 326–352. (Scholar)
• Pelletier, F. J., 1994, ‘The principle of semantic compositionality,’ Topoi, 13: 11–24. (Scholar)
• –––, 2001, ‘Did Frege believe in Frege's Principle?’ Journal of Logic, Language, and Information 10: 87–114. (Scholar)
• –––, 2003, ‘Context-dependence and compositionality,’ Mind and Language, 18: 148–161. (Scholar)
• Pietroski, P., 2005, Events and semantic architecture, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Pietroski, P., 2012, ‘Semantic monadicity and conceptual polyadicity,’ in M. Werning, W. Hinzen, and E. Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 129–148. (Scholar)
• Platts, M., 1979, Ways of Meaning, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
• Quine, V., 1960, Word and Object, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Recanati, F., 2004, Literal Meaning, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Recanati, F., 2012, ‘Flexibility and context-dependence,’ in M. Werning, W. Hinzen, and E. Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 175–191. (Scholar)
• Robbins, P., 2001, ‘What compositionality still can do,’ Philosophical Quarterly, 51: 328–336. (Scholar)
• Robbins, P., 2005, ‘The myth of reverse compositionality’ Philosophical Studies, 125: 251–275. (Scholar)
• Sainsbury, M., 2001, ‘Two ways to smoke a cigarette’ Ratio, 14: 386–406. (Scholar)
• Salmon, N., 1986, Frege's Puzzle, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Schiffer, S., 1987, The Remnants of Meaning, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• –––, 1991, ‘Does Mentalese have a compositional semantics?’ in B. Loewer and G. Rey (eds.), Meaning in Mind: Fodor and his Critics, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Searle, J., 1980, ‘The background of meaning’ in F. Kiefer and M. Bierwisch (eds.), Speech-Act Theory and Pragmatics, Dordrecht: Reidel. (Scholar)
• Soames, S., 2005, ‘Naming and asserting,’ in Z. G. Szabó (ed.), Semantics vs. Pragmatics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 356–382. (Scholar)
• Stainton, R., 2003, Words and Thoughts, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Stanley, J. and Z. G. Szabó, 2000, ‘On quantifier domain restriction,’ Mind and Language, 15: 219–261. (Scholar)
• Szabó, Z. G., 2000a, Problems of Compositionality, New York: Garland. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000b, ‘Compositionality as supervenience,’ Linguistics and Philosophy, 23: 475–505. (Scholar)
• –––, 2000c, ‘Adjectives in context,’ in I. Kenesei and R. Harnish (eds.), Perspectives on Semantics, Pragmatics, and Discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 119–146. (Scholar)
• –––, 2004, ‘Review of J. Fodor and E. Lepore The Compositionality Papers,’ Mind 113: 340–344. (Scholar)
• –––, 2008, ‘Structure and Conventions.‘Philosophical Studies, 137: 399–408. (Scholar)
• –––, 2010, ‘The Determination of Content,’ Philosophical Studies, 148: 253–272. (Scholar)
• Werning, M., 2004, ‘Compositionality, context, categories and the indeterminacy of translation,’ Erkenntnis, 60: 145–178. (Scholar)
• Werning, M., 2005, ‘Right and wrong reasons for compositionality,’ M. Werning (ed.), The Compositionality of Meaning and Content. Volume 1: Foundational Issues, Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag: 285–309. (Scholar)
• Westerståhl, D., 1998, ‘On mathematical proofs of the vacuity of compositionality,’ Linguistics and Philosophy, 21: 635–643. (Scholar)
• –––, 2012, ‘Compositionality in Kaplan-style semantics,’ in M. Werning, W. Hinzen, and E. Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 192–219. (Scholar)
• Zadrozny, W., 1994, ‘From compositional to systematic semantics,’ Linguistics and Philosophy, 17: 329–342. (Scholar)
• Zeevat, H., 1989, ‘A compositional approach to Discourse Representation Theory,’ Linguistics and Philosophy, 12: 95–131. (Scholar)
• Zimmermann, T. E., 2012, ‘Compositionality problems and how to solve them,’ in M. Werning, W. Hinzen, and E. Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 81–106. (Scholar)

Generated Wed May 22 23:27:44 2013