Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Rule Consequentialism" by Brad Hooker |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Adams, R. M, 1976, “Motive Utilitarianism”, Journal of Philosophy 73: 467–81. (Scholar)
- Arneson, R., 1999a, “Human Flourishing versus Desire Satisfaction”, Social Philosophy & Policy 16: 113–42. (Scholar)
- Arneson, R., 1999b, “Egalitarianism and Responsibility”, Journal of Ethics 3: 225–47. (Scholar)
- Arneson, R., “Sophisticated Rule Consequentialism: Some Simple Objections”, Philosophical Issues 15: 235–251. (Scholar)
- Attfield, R., 1995, Value, Obligation and Meta-ethics (Amsterdam: Rodopi BV Editions). (Scholar)
- Austin, J., 1832, The Province of Jurisprudence Determined. (Scholar)
- Audi, R., 2001, “A Kantian Intuitionism”, Mind 110: 601–35. (Scholar)
- Audi, R., 2004, The Good in the Right: A Theory of Intuition and Intrinsic Value (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press). (Scholar)
- Bales, R. E, 1971, “Act-Utilitarianism: Account of Right-making Characteristics or Decision-making Procedure?”American Philosophical Quarterly 8: 257–65. (Scholar)
- Barrow, R., 1991, Utilitarianism: A Contemporary Statement (Aldershot: Edward Elgar). (Scholar)
- Berkeley, G., 1712, Passive Obedience, or the Christian Doctrine of Not Resisting the Supreme Power, Proved and Vindicated upon the Principles of the Law of Nature. Reprinted in D. H. Monro (ed.), A Guide to the British Moralists (London: Fontana, 1972), pp. 217–27. (Scholar)
- Brand-Ballard, J., 2007, “Why One Principle?” Utilitas 19: 220–42. (Scholar)
- Brandt, R. B., 1959, Ethical Theory (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall). (Scholar)
- Brandt, R. B., 1963, “Toward a Credible Form of Utilitarianism”, in H.-N. Castañeda and G. Nakhnikian, eds., Morality and the Language of Conduct (Detroit: Wayne State University Press), pp. 107–43. (Scholar)
- Brandt, R. B., 1967, “Some Merits of One Form of Rule-Utilitarianism”, University of Colorado Studies in Philosophy, pp. 39–65. Reprinted in Brandt 1992: 111–36. (Scholar)
- Brandt, R. B., 1979, A Theory of the Good and the Right (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Brandt, R. B., 1983, “Problems of Contemporary Utilitarianism: Real and Alleged”, in N. Bowie, ed., Ethical Theory in the Last Quarter of the Twentieth Century, pp. 81–105 (Indianapolis: Hackett). (Scholar)
- Brandt, R. B., 1988, “Fairness to Indirect Optimific Theories in Ethics”, Ethics 98: 341–60. Reprinted in Brandt 1992: 137–57. (Scholar)
- Brandt, R. B., 1989, “Morality and its Critics”, American Philosophical Quarterly 26: 89–100. Reprinted in Brandt 1992: 73–92. (Scholar)
- Brandt, R. B., 1992, Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights (New York: Cambridge University Press). (Scholar)
- Brandt, R. B., 1996, Facts, Values, and Morality (New York: Cambridge University Press). (Scholar)
- Brink, D., 1989, Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics (New York: Cambridge University Press). (Scholar)
- Card, R., 2007, “Inconsistency and the Theoretical Commitments of Hooker's Rule-consequentialism”, Utilitas 19: 243–58. (Scholar)
- Carson, T., 1991, “A Note on Hooker's ‘Rule Consequentialism’”, Mind 100: 117–21. (Scholar)
- Crisp, R., 1992, “Utilitarianism and the Life of Virtue”, Philosophical Quarterly 42: 139–60. (Scholar)
- Crisp, R., 1997, Mill on Utilitarianism (London: Routledge). (Scholar)
- Crisp, R., 2000, “Griffin's Pessimism”, in Crisp and Hooker (eds.), pp. 115–28. (Scholar)
- Crisp, R. and B. Hooker (eds.) 2000, Well-Being and Morality: Essays in Honour of James Griffin (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Ebertz, R., 1993, “Is Reflective Equilibrium a Coherentist Model?”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 23: 193–214. (Scholar)
- Eggleston, B., 1997, “Conflicts of Rules in Hooker's Rule-consequentialism”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 37. (Scholar)
- Foot, P., 2000, Natural Goodness (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Gaut, B., 1993, “Moral Pluralism”, Philosophical Papers 22: 17–40. (Scholar)
- Gaut, B., 1999, “Ragbags, Hard Cases, and Moral Pluralism”, Utilitas 11: 37–48. (Scholar)
- Gaut, B., 2002, “Justifying Moral Pluralism”, in P. Stratton-Lake (ed.), Ethical Intuitionism (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 137–60. (Scholar)
- Gert, B., 1998, Morality (New York: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Griffin, J., 1986, Well-Being: Its Meaning, Measurement and Moral Importance (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Hare, R. M., 1981, Moral Thinking (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Harrison, J, 1953, “Utilitarianism, Universalisation, and Our Duty To Be Just”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 53: 105–34. (Scholar)
- Harrod, R., 1936, “Utilitarianism Revised”, Mind 45: 137–56. (Scholar)
- Harsanyi, J., 1953, “Cardinal Utility in Welfare Economics and in the Theory of Risk-Taking”, Journal of Political Economy 61: 434–5. (Scholar)
- Harsanyi, J., 1955, “Cardinal Welfare, Individualistic Ethics, and Interpersonal Comparisons of Utility”, Journal of Political Economy 63: 309–21. (Scholar)
- Harsanyi, J., 1977, “Rule Utilitarianism and Decision Theory”, Erkenntnis 11: 25–53. (Scholar)
- Harsanyi, J., 1982, “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behaviour”, in A. Sen and B. Williams, eds., pp. 39–62. (Scholar)
- Harsanyi, J., 1993, “Expectation Effects, Individual Utilities, and Rational Desires”, in Hooker 1993: 115–26. (Scholar)
- Haslett, D. W., 1987, Equal Consideration: A Theory of Moral Justification (Newark, Del.: University of Delaware Press). (Scholar)
- Haslett, D. W., 1994, Capitalism With Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Haslett, D. W., 2000, “Values, Obligations, and Saving Lives”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller, (eds.), pp. 71–104. (Scholar)
- Hill, T. E., Jr., 2005, “Assessing Moral Rules: Utilitarian and Kantian Perspectives”, Philosophical Issues 15: 158–178. (Scholar)
- Hodgson, D. H., 1967, Consequences of Utilitarianism (London: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Hooker, B., ed., 1993, Rationality, Rules, and Utility: New Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Richard Brandt (Boulder, CO: Westview Press). (Scholar)
- Hooker, B., 2000, Ideal Code, Real World: A Rule-consequentialist Theory of Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Hooker, B., 2003, Review of Mulgan's Demands of Consequentialism, Philosophy 78: 289–96. (Scholar)
- Hooker, B., 2005, “Reply to Arneson and McIntyre”, Philosophical Issues 15: 264–81. (Scholar)
- Hooker, B., 2006, “Feldman, Rule-consequentialism, and Desert”, in K. McDaniel, J. Raibley, R. Feldman, and M. J. Zimmerman (eds.), The Good, the Right, Life and Death: Essays in Honor of Fred Feldman (Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing, 2006), pp. 103–14. (Scholar)
- Hooker, B., 2007, “Rule-consequentialism and Internal Consistency: A Reply to Card”, Utilitas 19: 514–9. (Scholar)
- Hooker, B. and Fletcher, G., 2008, “Variable versus Fixed-rate Rule-utilitarianism”, Philosophical Quarterly, 58. (Scholar)
- Hooker, B., Mason, E., and Miller, D., eds., 2000, Morality, Rules, and Consequences, (Edinburgh University Press, Rowman and Littlefield). (Scholar)
- Hospers, J., 1972, Human Conduct, Problems of Ethics (New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.). (Scholar)
- Hursthouse, R., 1999, On Virtue Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Hursthouse, R., 2002, “Virtue Ethics vs Rule-Consequentialism” Utilitas 14: 41-53. (Scholar)
- Johnson, C., 1991, Moral Legislation (New York: Cambridge University Press). (Scholar)
- Kagan, S., 1989, The Limits of Morality (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Kagan, S., 1998, Normative Ethics (Boulder, CO: Westview Press). (Scholar)
- Kagan, S., 1999, “Equality and Desert”, in Pojman and McLeod (eds.): 298–314. (Scholar)
- Kagan, S., 2000, “Evaluative Focal Points”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller, (eds.), pp. 134–55. (Scholar)
- Kamm, F., 2002, “Owing, Justifying, Rejecting: Thomas Scanlon's What We Owe to Each Other”, Mind 111: 323–54. (Scholar)
- Lang, G., 2004, “A Dilemma for Objective Act-Utilitarianism”, Politics, Philosophy and Economics, forthcoming. (Scholar)
- Law, I., 1999, “Rule-consequentialism's Dilemma”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 2: 263–76. (Scholar)
- Lawlor, R., 2004,“Hooker's Ideal Code and the Sacrifice Problem”, Social Theory and Practice 30. (Scholar)
- Levy, S., 2000, “The Educational Equivalence of Act and Rule Utilitarianism”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller, (eds.), pp. 27–39. (Scholar)
- Lewis, D., 1972, “Utilitarianism and Truthfulness”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 50: 17–19. (Scholar)
- Lyons, D., 1965, Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Lyons, D., 2000, “The Moral Opacity of Utilitarianism”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller, (eds.), pp. 105–120. (Scholar)
- Mabbott, J. D., 1953, “Moral Rules”, Proceedings of the British Academy 37: 97–117, esp. 107–117. (Scholar)
- Mill, J. S., 1861, Utilitarianism. (Scholar)
- McIntyre, A., 2005, “The Perils of Holism: Brad Hooker's Ideal Code, Real World”, Philosophical Issues 15: 252–263. (Scholar)
- McNaughton, P. and Rawling, P., 1998, “On Defending Deontology”, Ratio 11: 37–54. (Scholar)
- Montague, P., 2000, “Why Rule Consequentialism Is Not Superior to Ross-Style Pluralism”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller, (eds.), pp. 203–11. (Scholar)
- Moore, A., 2007, “Ethical Theory, Completeness & Consistency”, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 10: 297–308. (Scholar)
- Moore, G. E., 1903, Principia Ethica (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). (Scholar)
- Moore, G. E., 1912, Ethics (London: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Mulgan, T., 2001, The Demands of Consequentialism (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Mulgan, T., 2006, Future People (Oxford: Oxford University Press), chs. 2, 6. (Scholar)
- Norcross, A., 2002, “Contractualism and Aggregation”, Social Theory and Practice 28: 303–14. (Scholar)
- Overvold, M., 1980, “Self-interest and the Concept of Self-sacrifice”, Canadian Journal of Philosophy 10: 105–18. (Scholar)
- Overvold, M., 1982, “Self-interest and Getting What You Want”, The Limits of Utilitarianism, eds. H.B. Miller and W.H. Williams (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press), pp. 186–94. (Scholar)
- Parfit, D., 1984, Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Parfit, D., 1997, “Equality and Priority”, Ratio 10: 202–21. (Scholar)
- Parfit, D., 2003, “Justifiablity to Each Person”, Ratio 16: 368–90. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P., 1991, “Consequentialism”, in Companion to Ethics, edited by Peter Singer (Oxford: Blackwell Publishers) pp. 230–40. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P., 1994, “Consequentialism and Moral Psychology”, International Journal of Philosophical Studies 2: 1–17. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P., 1997, “The Consequentialist Perspective”, in M. Baron, P. Pettit, and M. Slote, Three Methods of Ethics (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers), pp. 92–174. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P. and G. Brennan, 1986, “Restrictive Consequentialism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64: 438–55. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P. and Michael Smith, 2000, “Global Consequentialism”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller, (eds.), pp. 221–33. (Scholar)
- Plato, c 380BC, The Republic.
- Railton, P., 1984, “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality”, Philosophy and Public Affairs 13: 174–31. (Scholar)
- Raz, J., 2003, “Numbers, With and Without Contractualism”, Ratio 16: 346–367. (Scholar)
- Rawls, J., 1951, “Outline for a Decision Procedure in Ethics”, Philosophical Review 60: 177–97. (Scholar)
- Rawls, J., 1955, “Two Concepts of Rules”, Philosophical Review 64: 3–32. (Scholar)
- Rawls, J., 1971, A Theory of Justice (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). (Scholar)
- Ridge, M., 2006, “Introducing Variable-Rate Rule-Utilitariansim”, Philosophical Quarterly 56: 242–53. (Scholar)
- Riley, J., 2000, “Defending Rule Utilitarianism”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller, (eds.), pp. 40–69. (Scholar)
- Ross, W. D, 1930, The Right and the Good (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Ross, W. D, 1939, Foundations of Ethics (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Sayre-McCord, G., 1986, “Coherence and Models for Moral Theorizing”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 18: 170–90. (Scholar)
- Sayre-McCord, G., 1996, “Coherentist Epistemology and Moral Theory”, in W. Sinnott-Armstrong and M. Timmons (eds.), Moral Knowledge? (New York: Oxford University Press), pp. 137–59. (Scholar)
- Scanlon, T. M., 1982, “Contractualism and Utilitarianism”, in A. Sen and B. Williams (eds.), Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 103–28. (Scholar)
- Scanlon, T. M., 1998, What We Owe to Each Other (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press). (Scholar)
- Sen, A., and B. Williams, eds., 1982, Utilitarianism and Beyond (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). (Scholar)
- Shaw, W., 1993, “Welfare, Equality, and Distribution: Brandt from the Left”, in Hooker 1993, (ed.), 165–87. (Scholar)
- Shaw, W., 1999, Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism (Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishers). (Scholar)
- Shaw, W., 2000, “Between Act and Rule: The Consequentialism of G. E. Moore”, in Hooker, Mason, and Miller, (eds.), pp. 6–26. (Scholar)
- Sidgwick, H., 1907, Methods of Ethics, seventh edition (London: Macmillan). (Scholar)
- Singer, M., 1955: “Generalization in Ethics”, Mind 64: pp. 361–75. (Scholar)
- Singer, M., 1961, Generalization in Ethics (New York: Knopf). (Scholar)
- Singer, P., 1972, “Is Act-utilitarianism Self-defeating?” Philosophical Review 81: 94-104. (Scholar)
- Smart, J. J. C., 1956, “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism”, Philosophical Quarterly 6: 344–54. (Scholar)
- Smart, J. J. C., 1973, “Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics” in J. J. C. Smart and Bernard Williams, Utilitarianism: For and Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 3–74. (Scholar)
- Sorensen, R., 1996, “Unknowable Obligations”, Utilitas 7: 247–71. (Scholar)
- Stratton-Lake, P., 1997, “Can Hooker's Rule-Consequentialist Principle Justify Ross's Prima Facie Duties?”, Mind 106: 151–58. (Scholar)
- Streumer, B., 2003, “Can Consequentialism Cover Everything?”, Utilitas 15: 237–47. (Scholar)
- Suikkanen, J., 2008, “A Dilemma for Rule-consequentialism”, Philosophia (forthcoming). (Scholar)
- Temkin, L., 1993, Inequality (Oxford: Oxford University Press). (Scholar)
- Toulmin, S., 1950, The Place of Reason in Ethics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). (Scholar)
- Urmson, J. O., 1953, “The Interpretation of the Moral Philosophy of J. S. Mill”. Philosophical Quarterly 10: 33–9. (Scholar)
- Urmson, J. O., 1975, “A Defence of Intuitionism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 75: 144–52. (Scholar)
- Williams, B., 1973, “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, in J. J. C. Smart and B. Williams, Utilitarianism: For & Against (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 77–150. (Scholar)
- Williams, B., 1982, “The Point of View of the Universe: Sidgwick and the Ambitions of Ethics”, The Cambridge Review (7 May); reprinted in Williams 1995: 153–71. (Scholar)
- Williams, B., 1995, Making Sense of Humanity and Other Essays (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press). (Scholar)
Generated Fri May 3 00:39:59 2013
