Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Consequentialism" by Walter Sinnott-Armstrong |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Adams, R.M., 1976. “Motive Utilitarianism”, Journal of Philosophy, 73: 467–81. (Scholar)
- Bales, R. E., 1971. “Act-utilitarianism: account of right-making characteristics or decision-making procedures?”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 8: 257–65. (Scholar)
- Bayles, M. (ed.), 1968. Contemporary Consequentialism, Garden City, NY; Doubleday. (Scholar)
- Bennett, J., 1989. “Two Departures from Consequentialism”, Ethics, 100: 54–66. (Scholar)
- –––, 1995. The Act Itself, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Bentham, J., 1843. Rationale of Reward, Book 3, Chapter 1, in The Works of Jeremy Bentham, J. Bowring (ed.), Edinburgh: William Tait. (Scholar)
- Bentham, J., 1961. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation, Garden City: Doubleday. Originally published in 1789. (Scholar)
- Bradley, B., 2005. “Virtue Consequentialism”, Utilitas, 17: 282–298. (Scholar)
- Bradley, B., 2006. “Against Satisficing Consequentialism”, Utilitas, 18: 97–108. (Scholar)
- Brandt, R., 1979. A Theory of the Good and the Right, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992. Morality, Utilitarianism, and Rights, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Brink, D., 1986. “Utilitarian Morality and the Personal Point of View”, Journal of Philosophy, 83: 417–38. (Scholar)
- –––, 1989. Moral Realism and the Foundations of Ethics, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2006. “Some Forms and Limits of Consequentialism”, in The Oxford Handbook of Ethical Theory, D. Copp (ed.), Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Broome, J., 1991. Weighing Goods, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Carritt, E. F., 1947. Ethical and Political Thinking, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Chang, R., 1997. Incommensurability, Incomparability, and Practical Reason, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Chappell, T., 2001. “Options Ranges”, Journal of Applied Philosophy, 18 (2): 107–118. (Scholar)
- Cummiskey, D., 1996. Kantian Consequentialism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Darwall, S. (ed.), 2003. Consequentialism, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Driver, J., 2001a. Uneasy Virtue, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 2001b. Character and Consequentialism, Special Issue of Utilitas, 13 (2). (Scholar)
- Feldman, F., 1986. Doing the Best We Can, Boston: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997. Utilitarianism, Hedonism, and Desert, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2004. Pleasure and the Good Life: Concerning the Nature, Varieties, and Plausibility of Hedonism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Foot, P., 1967. “Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect”, Oxford Review, 5: 28–41. (Scholar)
- –––, 1983. “Utilitarianism and the Virtues”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 57 (2): 273–83. Revised in Mind, 94 (1985): 196–209. (Scholar)
- Frey, R. G. (ed.), 1984. Utility and Rights, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Geach, P., 1956. “Good and Evil”, Analysis, XVII (2): 33–42. (Scholar)
- Frey, R. G. (ed.), 1984. Utility and Rights, Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Gert, B., 2005. Morality: Its Nature and Justification, New York: Oxford University Press, revised edition. (Scholar)
- Goodin, R. E., 1995. Utilitarianism as a Public Philosophy, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Griffin, J., 1986. Well-Being, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Hare, R. M., 1963. Freedom and Reason, London: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981. Moral Thinking, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Harsanyi, J. C., 1977. “Morality and the Theory of Rational Behavior”, Social Research, 44 (4): 623–56. Reprinted in Sen and Williams 1982. (Scholar)
- –––, 1978. “Bayesian Decision Theory and Utilitarian Ethics”, The American Economic Review, 68: 223–8. (Scholar)
- Hart, H. L. A., and Honoré, T., 1985. Causation in the Law, Second Edition. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Hooker, B., 2000. Ideal Code, Real World, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Hooker, B., Mason, E., and Miller, D. E., 2000. Morality, Rules, and Consequences, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
- Howard-Snyder, F., 1994. “The Heart of Consequentialism”, Philosophical Studies, 76: 107–29. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996. “A New Argument for Consequentialism? A Reply to Sinnott-Armstrong”, Analysis, 56: 111–115. (Scholar)
- Hurka, T., 1993. Perfectionism, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001. Virtue, Vice, and Value, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Hutcheson, F., 1965. A System of Moral Philosophy, Selection in Selby-Bigge (1965). Originally published in 1755. (Scholar)
- Jackson, F., 1991. “Decision-Theoretic Consequentialism and the Nearest and Dearest Objection”, Ethics, 101: 461–82. (Scholar)
- Jamieson, D., 2005. “When Utilitarians Should be Virtue Theorists”. Utilitas, 19 (02):160-. (Scholar)
- Jamieson, D., and Elliot, R., 2009. “Progressive Consequentialism”. Philosophical Perspectives, 23: 241–251. (Scholar)
- Kagan, S., 1989. The Limits of Morality, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1998. Normative Ethics, Boulder: Westview. (Scholar)
- Kupperman, J. J., 1981. “A Case for Consequentialism”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 18: 305–13. (Scholar)
- Lyons, D., 1965. Forms and Limits of Utilitarianism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- McCloskey, H. J., 1965. “A Non-Utilitarian Approach to Punishment”, Inquiry, 8: 239–55. (Scholar)
- McNaughton, D., and Rawling, P., 1991. “Agent-Relativity and the Doing-Happening Distinction”, Philosophical Studies, 63: 167–85. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992. “Honoring and Promoting Values”, Ethics, 102: 835–43. (Scholar)
- Mill, J. S., 1861. Utilitarianism, edited with an introduction by Roger Crisp. New York: Oxford University Press, 1998. (Scholar)
- Moore, G. E., 1903. Principia Ethica, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1912. Ethics, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Mulgan, T., 2001. The Demands of Consequentialism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Murphy, L., 2000. Moral Demands in Nonideal Theory, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Norcross, A., 1997. “Comparing Harms: Headaches and Human Lives”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 26: 135–67. (Scholar)
- Nozick, R., 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia, New York: Basic Books. (Scholar)
- Nussbaum, Martha C., 2000. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach, New York: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Parfit, D., 1984. Reasons and Persons, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P., 1984. “Satisficing Consequentialism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 58: 165–76. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 1993. Consequentialism, Aldershot: Dartmouth. (Scholar)
- –––, 1997. “The Consequentialist Perspective” in Three Methods of Ethics, by M. Baron, P. Pettit, and M. Slote. Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P., and Brennan, G., 1986. “Restrictive Consequentialism”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 64: 438–55. (Scholar)
- Pettit, P., and Smith, M., 2000. “Global Consequentialism” in Hooker et al, pp. 121–33. (Scholar)
- Portmore, Douglas W., 2001. “Can an Act-Consequentialist Theory be Agent-Relative?” American Philosophical Quarterly, 38: 363–77. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003. “Position-Relative Consequentialism. Agent-Centered Options, and Supererogation”, Ethics, 113: 303–32. (Scholar)
- Railton, P., 1984. “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 13: 134–71. Reprinted in Railton 2003. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003. Facts, Values, and Norms: Essays toward a Morality of Consequence, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Rawls, J., 1955. “Two Concepts of Rules”, Philosophical Review, 64: 3–32. (Scholar)
- –––, 1971. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Regan, D., 1980. Utilitarianism and Cooperation, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Roberts, M. A., 2002. “A New Way of Doing the Best That We Can: Person-Based Consequentialism and the Equality Problem”, Ethics, 112, 2: 315–50. (Scholar)
- Ross, W. D., 1930. The Right and the Good, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Sayre-McCord, G., 2001. “Mill's ‘Proof’ of the Principle of Utility: A More than Half-Hearted Defense”, in Moral Knowledge, E. F. Paul, F. D. Miller, and J. Paul (eds.), New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 330–60. (Scholar)
- Scanlon, T. M., 1982. “Contractualism and Utilitarianism”, in Sen and Williams (eds.) 1982. (Scholar)
- Scarre, G., 1996. Utilitarianism, London: Routledge. (Scholar)
- Scheffler, S., 1982. The Rejection of Consequentialism, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Revised edition 1994. (Scholar)
- ––– (ed.), 1988. Consequentialism and Its Critics, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Schneewind, Jerome, 1990. Moral Philosophy from Montaigne to Kant, New York: Cambridge University Press, 2002. (Scholar)
- Selby-Bigge, L. A. (ed.), 1965. British Moralists, New York: Dover. (Scholar)
- Sen, A., 1979. “Utilitarianism and Welfarism”, Journal of Philosophy, 76: 463–89. (Scholar)
- –––, 1982. “Rights and Agency”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, 11 (1): 3–39. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985. “Well-Being, Agency, and Freedom”, Journal of Philosophy, 82 (4): 169–221. (Scholar)
- –––. 2002. Rationality and Freedom, Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
- Sen, A., and Williams, B. (eds.), 1982. Utilitarianism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Shaw, W. H., 1999. Contemporary Ethics: Taking Account of Utilitarianism, Malden: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- Sidgwick, H., 1907. The Methods of Ethics, Seventh Edition. London: Macmillan. First Edition 1874. (Scholar)
- Singer, M., 1977. “Actual Consequence Utilitarianism”, Mind, 86: 67–77. (Scholar)
- Singer, P., 1974. “Sidgwick and Reflective Equilibrium”, Monist, 58: 490–517. (Scholar)
- –––, 1993. Practical Ethics, Second Edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Sinnott-Armstrong, W., 1988. Moral Dilemmas, Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
- –––, 1992. “An Argument for Consequentialism”, Philosophical Perspectives, 6: 399–421. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001. “What is Consequentialism? A Reply to Howard-Snyder”, Utilitas, 13 (3): 342-9. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003a. “For Goodness' Sake”, Southern Journal of Philosophy, 41 (Supplement): 83–91. (Scholar)
- –––, 2003b. “Gert Contra Consequentialism” in Rationality, Rules, and Ideals, W. Sinnott-Armstrong and R. Audi (eds.), New York: Rowman and Littlefield. (Scholar)
- –––, 2005. “You Ought to be Ashamed of Yourself (When you Violate an Imperfect Moral Obligation)”, Philosophical Issues, 15: 193–208. (Scholar)
- –––, 2009. “How strong is this obligation? An argument for consequentialism from concomitant variation”, Analysis, 69: 438–442. (Scholar)
- Skorupski, J., 1995. “Agent-Neutrality, Consequentialism, Utilitarianism … A Terminological Note,” Utilitas, 7: 49–54. (Scholar)
- –––, 1999. Ethical Explorations, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Slote, M., 1984. “Satisficing Consequentialism”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 58: 139–63. (Scholar)
- –––, 1985. Common-Sense Morality and Consequentialism, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Smart, J. J. C., 1956. “Extreme and Restricted Utilitarianism”, The Philosophical Quarterly, 6: 344–54. (Scholar)
- –––, 1973. “An Outline of a System of Utilitarian Ethics” in Utilitarianism: For and Against, by J.J.C. Smart and B. Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–74. (Scholar)
- Smart, R. N., 1958. “Negative Utilitarianism”, Mind, 67: 542–3. (Scholar)
- Sosa, D., 1993. “Consequences of Consequentialism”, Mind, 102 (405): 101–22. (Scholar)
- Sprigge, T. L. S., 1965. “A Utilitarian Reply to Dr. McCloskey”, Inquiry, 8: 264–91. (Scholar)
- –––, 1988. The Rational Foundations of Ethics, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. (Scholar)
- Sumner, L. W., 1987. The Moral Foundations of Rights, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- –––, 1996. Welfare, Happiness, and Ethics, Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Scholar)
- Sverdlik, Steven, 2011. Motives and Rightness, Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Tannsjo, Torbjorn, 1998. Hedonistic Utilitarianism, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. (Scholar)
- Thomson, J. J., 1976. “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem”, The Monist, 59: 204–17. (Scholar)
- –––, 1994. “Goodness and Utilitarianism”, Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 67 (4): 7–21. (Scholar)
- –––, 2001. Goodness and Advice, Amy Gutmann (ed.), Princeton; Princeton University Press. (Scholar)
- Unger, P., 1996. Living High and Letting Die, New York: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
- Williams, B., 1973. “A Critique of Utilitarianism” in Utilitarianism: For and Against, by J.J.C. Smart and B. Williams. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 77–150. (Scholar)
- –––, 1981. “Persons, Character, and Morality”, in B. Williams, Moral Luck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
Generated Sun May 19 05:09:29 2013
