Online research in philosophy

• Home
• New items
  • All new items
  • Books
  • Journal articles
  • Manuscripts
• Browse by area
  • All Categories
  • Metaphysics and Epistemology
    • Epistemology
    • Metaphilosophy
    • Metaphysics
    • Philosophy of Action
    • Philosophy of Language
    • Philosophy of Mind
    • Philosophy of Religion
    • M&E, Misc
  • Value Theory
    • Aesthetics
    • Applied Ethics
    • Meta-Ethics
    • Normative Ethics
    • Philosophy of Gender, Race, and Sexuality
    • Philosophy of Law
    • Social and Political Philosophy
    • Value Theory, Miscellaneous
  • Science, Logic, and Mathematics
    • Logic and Philosophy of Logic
    • Philosophy of Biology
    • Philosophy of Cognitive Science
    • Philosophy of Computing and Information
    • Philosophy of Mathematics
    • Philosophy of Physical Science
    • Philosophy of Social Science
    • Philosophy of Probability
    • General Philosophy of Science
    • Philosophy of Science, Misc
  • History of Western Philosophy
    • Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy
    • Medieval and Renaissance Philosophy
    • 17th/18th Century Philosophy
    • 19th Century Philosophy
    • 20th Century Philosophy
    • History of Western Philosophy, Misc
  • Philosophical Traditions
    • African/Africana Philosophy
    • Asian Philosophy
    • Continental Philosophy
    • European Philosophy
    • Philosophy of the Americas
    • Philosophical Traditions, Miscellaneous
  • Philosophy, Misc
    • Philosophy, Introductions and Anthologies
    • Philosophy, General Works
    • Philosophy, Miscellaneous
  • Other Academic Areas
    • Natural Sciences
    • Social Sciences
    • Cognitive Sciences
    • Formal Sciences
    • Arts and Humanities
    • Professional Areas
    • Other Academic Areas, Misc
• Browse journals
• Discussions
  • All
  • Philosophy
  • In my forums
  • In the profession
  • About PhilPapers
  • Paper discussions
• Sign in
  • Sign in
  • Register
  • I've forgotten my password
• Submit material
  • Submit a book or article
  • Upload a bibliography
  • Personal pages we track
  • Archives we track
  • Information for publishers
• Help & more
  • Introduction
  • Frequently Asked Questions
  • Editor's Guide
  • The Categorization Project
  • For Publishers
  • For Archive Admins
  • Contact us
  • PhilPapers Surveys
  • API
  • Bargain Finder
  • About PhilPapers

• Bach, K., (1987). Thought and Reference. Oxford: Oxford University press. (Scholar)
• Bach, K., (2000). “Quantification, Qualification, and Context: A Reply to Stanley and Szabo,” Mind and Language 15, 262-283. (Scholar)
• Barwise, J. and R. Cooper (1981). “Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language,” Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159-219. (Scholar)
• Block, N., and R. Stalnaker (1999). “Conceptual Analysis, Dualism and the Explanatory Gap”, The Philosophical Review, 108, 1-46. [Preprint available online.] (Scholar)
• Breheny, R, (1999). Context Dependence and Procedural Meaning: The Semantics of Definites. Ph.D thesis, Department of Linguistics, University College, London. (Scholar)
• Brown, M., (1992). “‘On Denoting’ Updated,” Acta Analytica 8, 7-32. (Scholar)
• Burge, T., (1980). “Truth and Singular Terms.” In M. Platts (ed.) Reference, Truth and Reality: Essays on the Philosophy of Language. London: Routledge & Keegan Paul, 167-181. (Scholar)
• Chastain, C., (1975)., “Reference and Context.” In K. Gunderson (ed.), Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science VII—Language, Mind and Knowledge. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
• Chalmers, D., (2004). “The Foundations of Two-Dimensional Semantics.” in M. Garcia-Carpintero & J. Macia, (eds) Two-Dimensional Semantics: Foundations and Applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Preprint available online.] (Scholar)
• Chalmers, D., (2002). “The Components of Content.” In D. Chalmers (ed.) Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press. [Preprint available online.] (Scholar)
• Cooper, R., (1979). “The Interpretation of Pronouns.” In F. Heny and H. Schnelle (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, vol. 10: Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table. New York: Academic Press, 61-92. (Scholar)
• Chomsky, N., (1975). “Questions of Form and Interpretation.” Linguistic Analysis 1, 75-109. (Scholar)
• Davies, M., (1981). Meaning, Quantification, Necessity. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul. (Scholar)
• Davies, M. and Humberstone, L. (1980). “Two Notions of Necessity.” Philosophical Studies 38, 1-30. (Scholar)
• Devitt, M., (1981). Designation. New York: Columbia University Press. (Scholar)
• Devitt, M., (2003). “The Case for Referential Descriptions.” In A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays on Definite and Indefinite Descriptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Devitt, M., and K. Sterelny. (1999). Language and Reality: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language, 2^nd edition. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Diesing, M., (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Donnellan, K. S., (1966). “Reference and Definite Descriptions,” Philosophical Review 77, 281-304. (Scholar)
• Donnellan, K. S., (1978). “Speaker Reference, Descriptions, and Anaphora.” In P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press, 47-68. (Scholar)
• Dummett, M., (1973). Frege: Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Dummett, M., (1981). The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy. London: Duckworth. (Scholar)
• Eluguardo, R., (2002). “The Predicate View of Proper Names.” In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13-53. (Scholar)
• Enç, M., (1986). “Towards a Referential Analysis of Temporal Expressions.” Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 405-426. (Scholar)
• Evans, G. (1973). “The Causal Theory of Names,”Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. vol 47, 187-208. (Scholar)
• Evans, G., (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Everett, A., and T. Hofweber (eds.), (2001). Empty Names, Fiction and the Puzzles of Non-Existence. Stanford: CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
• Fara, D.G., (2001). “Descriptions as Predicates.” Philosophical Studies 102, 1-42. Published under the name “Delia Graff.” (Scholar)
• von Fintel, K., (in press). “Would You Believe It? The King of France is Back! (Presupposition and Truth-Value Intuitions).” In A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays on Definite and Indefinite Descriptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Fodor, J.D., and I. Sag, (1982). “Referential and Quantificational Indefinites,” Linguistics and Philosophy 5, 355-398. (Scholar)
• French, P., and H. Wettstein (eds.), (2001). Midwest Studies in Language XXV: Figurative Language. Oxford: Blackwell's. (Scholar)
• Geach, P., (1962). Reference and Generality. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
• Grice, H. P., (1961). “The Causal Theory of Perception.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Suppl. Vol. 35, 121-52. (Scholar)
• Grice, H. P., (1975). “Logic and Conversation,” in J. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.) Syntax and Semantics, Vol 3: Speech Acts, New York: Academic Press. (Scholar)
• Grice, H. P., (1981). “Presupposition and Conversational Implicature,” in P. Cole (ed.) Radical Pragmatics, New York: Academic Press, 183-198. (Scholar)
• Heim, I., (1982).The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Scholar)
• Heim, I., (1990). “E-Type pronouns and Donkey Anaphora.” Linguistics and Philosophy 13, pp. 137-178. (Scholar)
• Higginbotham, J., (1987). “Indefiniteness and Predication.” In E. Reuland and A. ter Meulen (eds), The Representation of (In)definiteness. Cambridge: MIT Press, 43-70. (Scholar)
• Higginbotham, J., (1988). “Contexts, Models, and Meaning: A Note on the Data of Semantics.” In R. Kempson (ed.), Mental Representations: The Interface between Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 29-48. (Scholar)
• Higginbotham, J., and R. May: 1981, “Questions, Quantifiers and Crossing.” The Linguistic Review 1, 51-79. (Scholar)
• Hornsby, J., (1976). “Proper Names: A Defense of Burge,” Philosophical Studies 30, 227-234. (Scholar)
• Hornsby, J., (1977). “Singular Terms in Contexts of Propositional Attitude,” Mind 86, 31-48. (Scholar)
• Jackson, F., (1998). “Reference and Description Revisited.” In J. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 12: Language, Mind, and Ontology, Oxford: Blackwell, 201-218. [Preprint available online.] (Scholar)
• Kadmon, N., (1990). “Uniqueness.” Linguistics and Philosophy 13, pp. 273-324. (Scholar)
• Kamp, H., (1984). “A Theory of Truth and Semantic Interpretation,” in J. Groenendijk et al., (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Natural Language, Amsterdam Centre. Reprinted in J. Groenendijk et.al., (eds.), Truth, Interpretation, and Information, Dordrecht: Foris, 1-43. (Scholar)
• Kamp, H., and U. Reyle, (1993). From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. (Scholar)
• Kanazawa, M., (2001). “Singular Donkey Pronouns are Semantically Singular.” Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 383-403. (Scholar)
• Keenan, E. and Y. Stavi., (1986). “A Semantic Characterization of Natural Language Determiners.” Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 253-326. (Scholar)
• Kim, J., (1970). “Events and Their Descriptions: Some Considerations.” In N. Rescher (ed.), Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 199-215. (Scholar)
• King, J., (1987). “Pronouns, Descriptions, and the Semantics of Discourse.” Philosophical Studies 51, 341-62. (Scholar)
• King, J., (1988). “Are Indefinite Descriptions Ambiguous?” Philosophical Studies 53, 417-440. (Scholar)
• Kempson, R., (1975). Presupposition and The Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Kratzer, A., (1995), “Scope or pseudoscope? Are there wide scope indefinites”, in F. Hamm and A. von Stechow (eds.), proceedings of Recent Developments in the Theory of Natural Language, Universitäat Täubingen. (Scholar)
• Kratzer, A., (1989). “An Investigation of the Lumps of Thought,” Linguistics and Philosophy 12, pp. 607-653. (Scholar)
• Krifka, M., (1996). “Pragmatic Strengthening in Plural Predicates and Donkey Sentences.” In T. Galloway and J. Spence (eds.), Proceedings of SALT VI, Ithaca: Cornell University. (Scholar)
• Kripke, S., (1977). “Speaker Reference and Semantic Reference,” in French, Uehling, and Wettstein (eds.), Contemporary Perspectives in the Philosophy of Language, Minneapolis: University of Minnestoa Press, 6-27. (Scholar)
• Kripke, S., (1980). Naming and Necessity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (Scholar)
• Kroon, F., (1987). “Causal Descriptivism,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 65, 1-17. (Scholar)
• Kroon, (1989). “Circles and Fixed Points in Description Theories of Reference,” Noûs 23, 373-392. (Scholar)
• Lappin, S., (1989). “Donkey Pronouns Unbound,” Theoretical Linguistics 15, 263-286. (Scholar)
• Larson, R., and G. Segal, (1995). Knowledge of Meaning. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Lasersohn, P., (1993). “Existence Presuppositions and Background Knowledge.” Journal of Semantics 10, 112-122. (Scholar)
• Lepore, E., (2003). “An Abuse of Context in Semantics: The Case of Incomplete Definite Descriptions.” In A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays on Definite and Indefinite Descriptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Lewis, D., (1975). “Adverbs of Quantification.” In E. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 3-15. (Scholar)
• Lewis, D., (1979). “Scorekeeping in a Language Game,” Journal of Philosophical Logic 8, 339-359. (Scholar)
• Lewis, D., (1984). “Putnam's Paradox,” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, 221-236. (Scholar)
• Linsky, B., (1992). “The Logical Form of Descriptions” (Critical Notice of Stephen Neale's Descriptions), Dialogue 31: 677-83. (Scholar)
• Linsky, B., (2002). “Russell's Logical Form, LF, and Truth Conditions.” In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 391-408. (Scholar)
• Loar, B., (1976). “The Semantics of Singular Terms,” Philosophical Studies 30, 353-377. (Scholar)
• Ludlow, P., (1994). “Conditionals, Events, and Unbound Pronouns,” Lingua e Stile 29, 3-20. (Scholar)
• Ludlow, P., (1999). Semantics, Tense, and Time: an Essay in the Metaphysics of Natural Language. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Ludlow, P., (2001) “Metaphysical Austerity and the Problems of Temporal and Modal Anaphora,” in J. Tomberlin (ed.) Philosophical Perspectives 15: Metaphysics. Atascadero: Ridgeview Press. (Scholar)
• Ludlow, P., and S. Neale, (1991). “Indefinite Descriptions: In Defense of Russell,” Linguistics and Philosophy 14, pp. 171-202. (Scholar)
• Ludlow, P. and G. Segal, (2003). “On a Unitary Semantical Analysis for Definite and Indefinite Descriptions.” In A. Bezuidenhout and M. Reimer (eds.) Descriptions and Beyond: An Interdisciplinary Collection of Essays on Definite and Indefinite Descriptions. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Lycan, W., (1984). “A Syntactically Motivated Theory of Conditionals,” in French, Euhling, and Wettstein (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy IX. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Scholar)
• Mandelbaum, D., (1994). Syntactic Conditions on Saturation. PhD thesis, Graduate Faculty in Linguistis, CUNY Graduate Center. (Scholar)
• Marcus, R., (1948). “Modality and Description,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 13, 31-37. Reprinted in Modalities: Philosophical Essays. New York: Oxford University Press, 1993. (Scholar)
• Meinong, A., (1904). “Uber Gegenstandstheorie.” Translated as “The Theory of Objects,” in R. Chisolm, ed., Realism and the Background of Phenomenology. New York: Free Press, 1960. (Scholar)
• McDowell, J., (1977). “On the Sense and Reference of Proper Names,” Mind 86, 159-185. (Scholar)
• Neale, S., (1990). Descriptions. Cambridge: MIT Press Books. (Scholar)
• Neale, S., (2000a). “On a Milestone of Empiricism.” In P. Kotatko and A. Orenstein (eds.) Knowledge, Language and Logic: Questions for Quine. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 237-346. (Scholar)
• Neale, S., (2000b). “On Being Explicit: Comments on Stanley and Szabo, and on Bach.” Mind and Language 15, 284-294. (Scholar)
• Neale, S., (2002). “Abreviation, Scope, Ontology.” In G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds.), Logical Form and Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 13-53. (Scholar)
• Nelson, M., (2002) “Descriptivism Defended,” Noûs 36: 3, 408-35. (Scholar)
• Parsons, T., (1978). “Pronouns as Paraphrases.” Manuscript, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Scholar)
• Parsons, T., (1980). Nonexistent Objects. New Haven: Yale University Press. (Scholar)
• Prior, A. N., (1967). Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Recanati, F., (1986). “Contextual Dependence and Definite Descriptions,” Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society 87, 57-73. (Scholar)
• Reimer, M., (1992). “Incomplete Descriptions.” Erkenntnis 37, 347-63. (Scholar)
• Reimer, M., (1998). “Quantification and Context.” Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 95-115. (Scholar)
• Reimer, M., (1998). “Donnellan's Distinction/Kripke's Test,” Analysis 58, 89. (Scholar)
• van Rooy, J., (2001). “Exhaustivity in Dynamic Semantics: Referential and Descriptive Pronouns,” Linguistics and Philosophy 24, 621-657. (Scholar)
• Reinhart, T. (1997), “Quantifier-Scope: How labor is divided between QR and choice functions”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 20, 335-397. (Scholar)
• Russell, B., (1905). “On Denoting,” Mind 14, pp. 479-493. (Scholar)
• Russell, B., (1910-11). “Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description,” Proceedings of the Aristotelean Society. Reprinted in Mysticism and Logic, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1917, and New York: Doubleday, 1957. (Scholar)
• Russell, B., (1919). Introduction to Mathematical Philosophy, London: George Allen and Unwin. (Scholar)
• Russell, B., (1957). “Mr. Strawson on Referring.” Mind 66, 385-89. (Scholar)
• Salmon, N., (1982). “Assertion and Incomplete Descriptions.” Philosophical Studies 42, 37-45. (Scholar)
• Searle, J., (1958). “Proper Names.” Mind 67, 166-173. (Scholar)
• Searle, J., (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
• Sellars, W., (1954). “Presupposing.” Philosophical Review 63, 197-215. (Scholar)
• Sennet, A., (2002). “An Ambiguity Test for Definite Descriptions.” Philosophical Studies 111, 81-95. (Scholar)
• Sharvy, Richard (1980). “A More General Theory of Definite Descriptions,” The Philosophical Review 89, 607 - 623. (Scholar)
• Shiffer, S., (1978). “The Basis of Reference.” Erkenntnis 13, 171-206. (Scholar)
• Smiley, T.J., (1981). “The Theory of Descriptions.” Proceedings of the British Academy 67, 331-337. (Scholar)
• Smullyan, A., (1947). “Review of Quine's ‘The Problem of Interpreting Modal Logic’,” Journal of Symbolic Logic 12, 139-141. (Scholar)
• Smullyan, A., (1948). “Modality and Description.” Journal of Symbolic Logic 13, 483-545. (Scholar)
• Soames, S., (1976). A Critical Examination of Frege's Theory of Presupposition and Contemporary Alternatives. PhD thesis, MIT Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. (Scholar)
• Soames, S., (1986). “Incomplete Definite Descriptions,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 27, 349-375. (Scholar)
• Soames, S. (2002). Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Scholar)
• Soames, S., (2003). “The Two-Dimensionalist Attempt to Revive Descriptivism.” Msc., Princeton University, Dept. of Philosophy. (Scholar)
• Sosa, D., (1996). Representing Thoughts and Language. PhD thesis, Princeton University Department of Philosophy. (Scholar)
• Sosa, D., (2001). “Rigidity in the Scope of Russell's Theory,” Noûs 35, 1-38. (Scholar)
• Sperber, D., and D. Wilson, (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Stalnaker, R. (1978) “Assertion” in Syntax and Semantics: Pragmatics, Vol 9. P. Cole (ed.) Academic Press (Scholar)
• Stalnaker, R. (1990) “Narrow Content” in C. A. Anderson and J. Owens (eds.), Propositional Attitudes: The role of content in logic, language and mind, Stanford: CSLI, 131-146. (Scholar)
• Stanley, J., (1997). “Names and Rigid Designation.” In B. Hale and C. Wright (eds.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Blackwell Press, 555-585. (Scholar)
• Stanley, J., (1997b). “Rigidity and Content.” In R. Heck (ed.), Language, Thought, and Logic: Essays in Honor of Michael Dummett. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 131-156. (Scholar)
• Stanley, J., (2000). “Context and Logical Form.” Linguistics and Philosophy 23, 391-434. (Scholar)
• Stanley, J., (2002). “Making it Articulated.” Mind and Language 17, 149-68. (Scholar)
• Stanley, J. and Z. Szabo, (2000). “On Quantifier Domain Restriction.” Mind and Language 15, 219-61. (Scholar)
• Stanley, J., and T. Williamson (1995). “Quantifiers and Context-Dependence.” Analysis 55, 291-5. (Scholar)
• Strawson, P. F., (1950). “On Referring,” Mind, 59, 320-334. (Scholar)
• Strawson, P.F., (1952). Introduction to Logical Theory. London: Methuen. (Scholar)
• Strawson, P.F., (1959). Individuals. London: Methuen. (Scholar)
• Strawson, P.F., (1964). “Identifying Reference and Truth-Values,” Theoria 3, 96-118. (Scholar)
• Szabo, Z., (2000). “Descriptions and Uniqueness.” Philosophical Studies 101, 29-57. (Scholar)
• Thomason, R., (1990). “Accomodation, Meaning, and Implicature: Interdisciplinary Foundations for Pragmatics.” In P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. Pollack (eds) Intentions in Communication. Cambridge: MIT Press, 325-363. (Scholar)
• Wettstein, H., (1981). “Demonstrative Reference and Definite Descriptions,” Philosophical Studies 40, 241-257. (Scholar)
• Wiggins, D., (1965). “Identity Statements.” In R.J.Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy 2^nd edition. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. (Scholar)
• Williams, E., (1983). “Semantic vs. Syntactic Categories,” Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 423-446. (Scholar)
• Wilson, G., (1978). “On Definite and Indefinite Descriptions,” The Philosophical Review 87, 48 - 76. (Scholar)
• Wilson, N. (1959). “Substances without Substrata,” Review of Metaphysics 12, 521-539. (Scholar)
• Yoon, Y., (1996). “Total and Partial Predicates and the Weak and Strong Interpretations,” Natural Language Semantics 4, 217-236. (Scholar)
• Winter, Y., (1997). “Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites.” Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 399-467. [Preprint available online.] (Scholar)
• Zalta, E., (1983). Abstract Objects: an Introduction to Axiomatic Metaphysics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. (Scholar)
• Zalta, E., (1988). Intensional Logic and the Metaphysics of Intensionality. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
• Zvolensky, Z. (1997). “Definite Descriptions: What Frege got Right and Russell Didn't.” Aporia 7, 1-16. (Scholar)

Generated Sun May 19 01:23:59 2013