Linked bibliography for the SEP article "Discourse Representation Theory" by Bart Geurts |
This is an automatically generated and experimental page
If everything goes well, this page should display the bibliography of the aforementioned article as it appears in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, but with links added to PhilPapers records and Google Scholar for your convenience. Some bibliographies are not going to be represented correctly or fully up to date. In general, bibliographies of recent works are going to be much better linked than bibliographies of primary literature and older works. Entries with PhilPapers records have links on their titles. A green link indicates that the item is available online at least partially.
This experiment has been authorized by the editors of the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. The original article and bibliography can be found here.
- Asher, N. 1986. “Belief in Discourse Representation Theory”. Journal of Philosophical Logic 15: 127-189. (Scholar)
- –––. 1989. “Belief, acceptance and belief reports”. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 19: 321-361. (Scholar)
- Asher, N. and A. Lascarides. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Scholar)
- Barwise, J. 1987. “Noun phrases, generalized quantifiers and anaphora”. In P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1-30. (Scholar)
- Beaver, D. 1997. “Presupposition”. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, pp. 939-1008. (Scholar)
- –––. 2001. Presupposition and Assertion in Dynamic Semantics, CSLI Publications, Stanford. (Scholar)
- –––. 2002. “Presupposition in DRT”. In D. Beaver, L. Casillas-Martinez, B. Clark and S. Kaufmann (eds.), The Construction of Meaning, CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
- Beaver, D. and H. Zeevat, 2007. “Accommodation”. In G. Ramchand and C. Reiss (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, OUP. (Scholar)
- Blackburn, P. and J. Bos. 2005. Representation and Inference for Natural Language. A First Course in Computational Semantics, CSLI Publications (Scholar)
- Chierchia, G. 1994. “Intensionality and context change”. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 141-168. (Scholar)
- Chomsky, N. 1986. Barriers, Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 13, Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Dever, J. 1999. “Compositionality as methodology”. Linguistics and Philosophy 22: 311-326. (Scholar)
- Evans, G. 1980. “Pronouns”. Linguistic Inquiry 11. Pp. 337-436. (Scholar)
- Fauconnier, G. 1984. Espaces Mentaux. Paris: Editions de Minuit. (Scholar)
- –––. 1985. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: MIT Press. (Scholar)
- Geach, P.T. 1962. Reference and Generality. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. Second edition 1968. (Scholar)
- Geurts, B. 1999. Presuppositions and Pronouns. Elsevier, Oxford. (Scholar)
- –––. 2002. “Donkey business”. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 129-156. (Scholar)
- Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof 1989. “Dynamic Montague Grammar”. In Kálmán, L. and L. Pólos, eds., Logic and Language. Akadémiai, Budapest. (Scholar)
- –––. 1991. “Dynamic Predicate Logic”. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 39-100. (Scholar)
- Heim, I. 1982. The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts, Amherst. (Scholar)
- –––. 1990. “E-type pronouns and donkey anaphora”. Linguistics and Philosophy 13: 137-178.
- Hintikka, J. 1962. Knowledge and Belief: An Introduction to the Logic of the Two Notions, Cornell University Press. (Scholar)
- Janssen, T. M. V. 1997. “Compositionality”, in J. Van Benthem & A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, Amsterdam and MIT Press, Cambridge, , p417-473, 1997. (Scholar)
- Kamp, H. 1981. “A theory of truth and semantic representation”. In: J.A.G. Groenendijk, T.M.V. Janssen, and M.B.J. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Mathematical Centre Tracts 135, Amsterdam. Pp. 277-322.
- –––. 1990. “Prolegomena to a structural account of belief and other attitudes”. In C. A. Anderson and J. Owens (eds). Propositional Attitudes: The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 27-90. (Scholar)
- –––. 1995. “Discourse Representation Theory”, in: J. Verschueren, J.-O. Östman & J. Blommaert (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics, Benjamins, pp. 253-257. (Scholar)
- –––. 2001. “The Importance of Presupposition”, in Rohrer, C., Roßdeutscher, A. and H. Kamp, eds., Linguistic Form and its Computation, CSLI Publications. (Scholar)
- –––. 2001. “Computation and Justification of Presuppositions”. In M. Bras & L. Vieu (eds.) Semantic and Pragmatic Issues in Discourse and Dialogue, Elsevier. (Scholar)
- Kamp, H. and U. Reyle. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Kluwer, Dordrecht. (Scholar)
- –––. 1996. “A Calculus for First Order Discourse Representation Structures”. Journal of Logic, Language, and Information pp. 297-348. (Scholar)
- Kamp, H. and A. Roßdeutscher, 1994. “DRS-Construction and Lexically Driven Inference”, Theoretical Linguistics 20, pp. 165-235. (Scholar)
- Kanazawa, M. 1994. “Weak vs. strong readings of donkey sentences and monotonicity inference in a dynamic setting”. Linguistics and Philosophy 17: 109-158. (Scholar)
- Karttunen, L. 1974. “Presupposition and linguistic context”. Theoretical Linguistics 1: 181-194. (Scholar)
- Krahmer, E. 1998. Presupposition and Anaphora, CSLI Lecture Notes Series, Number 89, CSLI Publications Stanford, CA. (Scholar)
- Krifka, M. 1996. “Pragmatic Strengthening in Plural Predications and Donkey Sentences”, in T. Galloway and J. Spence (eds.), Proceedings from Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) VI, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, pp. 136-153. (Scholar)
- Kripke, S.A. 2009. “Presupposition and anaphora: remarks on the formulation of the projection problem”. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 367-386. (Scholar)
- Maier, E. 2010. “Presupposing acquaintance: a unified semantics for de dicto, de re and de se belief reports”. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 429-474. (Scholar)
- Montague, R. 1970. “Universal grammar”, Theoria 36, 373-398. (Scholar)
- Muskens, R. 1996. “Combining Montague Semantics and Discourse Representation”, Linguistics and Philosophy, 19:143-186. (Scholar)
- Neale, Stephen. 1990. Descriptions, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. (Scholar)
- Partee, B. H. 1973. “Some Structural Analogies between Tenses and Pronouns in English”, The Journal of Philosophy 70:601-609. (Scholar)
- –––. 1984. “Nominal and Temporal Anaphora”, Linguistics and Philosophy 7.3. Pp. 243-286. (Scholar)
- Rooth, M. 1987. “Noun Phrase Interpretation in Montague Grammar, File Change Semantics, and Situation Semantics”. In P. Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, Reidel, Dordrecht, 237-268. (Scholar)
- Saurer, W. 1993. “A natural deduction system for discourse representation theory”. Journal of Philosophical Logic, 22:249-302.
- Stalnaker, R. 1974. “Pragmatic Presuppositions”. In Milton K. Munitz and Peter K. Unger, eds., Semantics and Philosophy. New York: New York University Press. (Scholar)
- –––. 1998. “On the representation of context”, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 7(1):3-19. (Scholar)
- Thomason, R.H. 1974. Formal philosophy: selected papers of Richard Montague. Yale University Press, New Haven. (Scholar)
- van der Sandt, R.A. 1992. “Presupposition projection as anaphora resolution”. Journal of Semantics 9: 333-377. (Scholar)
- van Eijck, J., 2006. “Discourse representation theory”. In: K. Brown (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics (2nd edition), Elsevier. (Scholar)
- van Eijck, J. and H. Kamp. 1997. “Representing discourse in context”. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science, 179-237. (Scholar)
- van Genabith J., H. Kamp, and U. Reyle, to appear. “Discourse Representation Theory”, in D. Gabbay (ed.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic (second edition), Springer. (Scholar)
- van Leusen, N. 2007. Description Grammar for Discourse. Ph.D. thesis, University of Nijmegen. (Scholar)
- van Leusen, N. and R. Muskens 2003. “Construction by description in discourse representation”. In J. Peregrin (ed.), Meaning, the Dynamic Turn, Elsevier. 21(4). (Scholar)
- Zeevat, H. 1984. “Belief”. In Landman F. and F. Veltman (eds.), Varieties of Formal Semantics, Foris, Dordrecht. Pp. 405-425. (Scholar)
- –––. 1989a. “Realism and definiteness”. In: G. Chierchia, B. H. Partee, and R. Turner (eds.), Properties, Types and Meaning, Vol. 2. Kluwer, Dordrecht. Pp. 269-297. (Scholar)
- –––. 1989b. “A compositional approach to Discourse Representation Theory”. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 95-131. (Scholar)
- –––. 1992. “Presupposition and Accommodation in Update Semantics”, Journal of Semantics 9: 379-412. (Scholar)
- –––. 1996. “A Neoclassical Analysis of Belief Sentences”. In: Proceedings of the 10th Amsterdam Colloquium. ILLC, University of Amsterdam, part III, p. 723-742. (Scholar)
Generated Fri May 3 00:33:25 2013
